PO and PIR price, Infoupdate, deletion indicator......

Hello friends of MM,
I have a strange situation.. There is an inforecord in the system, correct validity, correct PB00 condition, the price is taken in the PO. (even there is a PO created with different price, updated the price history of the PIR). So far so good.
If I split the validity and set for the current validity a deletion indicator for PB00 condition (the only existing condition), the price is still adopted, without any messages, into PO price!!!
If I mark for deletion PB00 for all the rest periods, the PIR price is still adopted in the PO!!!!
Only after mark for deletion the PIR on Purch.org. level, things come to their place.
All my efforts are just to try to set the system not to adopt the price from the last PO, if there is no current valid PIR price.....

Thanks,  Sap: IN!
It turns out that it is just a misunderstanding! While I was testing, a colleague of mine has created a PO with the same material and so the last PO price was not the one I was expecting - the system is taking the last PO price correctly, although referring in the condition table to the current conditions form the PO (which were marked for deletion).... A coincidence, which took several hours of my life
Going to my task - to forbid price adoption from last PO - I set message 06219 "Net price for item & adopted from last document" to be error, but:
1) It turns out it is displayed only in case I put manually a price in the PO, different form the last PO price and the system overwrites it; it is not displayed when system adopts the price, without any manual entry before that
2) Even I set the message category to Error, I still get it Warning, although in F4 help it is written that this is settable and not hardcoded....
Any ideas?

Similar Messages

  • Mass delete scheduling agreement and PIR

    Dear SAP Experts,
    1. My company is first time Run the MRP so i have maintain the material master MRP 1,2,3,4 tab based on the requirement.
        Currently having many old Scheduling agreements / PO is their so i am get the open goods receipt list from ME2L - based on the selection    parameter.
      I have checked the list and note the many scheduling agreement no.
      So what is the for mass delete scheduling agreement / PO ( STO, normal PO,Import PO )
      I have also try MEMASSSA - Mass delete scheduling agreement, i am select the SA item level , Copy the Agreement no, select the deletion indicator, execute and save.
    But after i have seen the list it is not updated the deletion indicator L, it is not working properly.
    Kindly share the another t.code or any other way for mass delete SA / PO 
    Thanks,
    Umapathy

    Dear Uma,
    Please check this thread. may be it can help you.  Mass deletion of PO

  • Future price not deleted after cost run

    Hi all,
    If a material master has the future price maintained on the Accounting 1 view, then it is picked up in the next cost estimate that is created.
    Costing strategy is Future price, Price from PIR, Standard cost.
    However, I have been told that once the Cost estimate has been created, the future price is deleted from the material master. In this way the cost accountant can delay the release of a new standard price to avoid large re-valuations.
    The future price is not being deleted following our cost run, can anyone advise on this?
    Thanks
    Phil.

    Future prices will not delete when a cost estimate is released.  If the Future Price is ACTIVATED (no cost estimate involved) then the Future price field will clear because it is "rolled forward"  in the same manner that a Marked cost estimate is rolled forward to the Released Cost Estimate, leaving the field Future Planned Price on Costing 2 blank.
    Be very careful with CKME - it will activate future prices and release future planned cost estimates, but it does not stop and show you what is about to be activated or released and the financial impact.   We wrote a custom transaction that had CKME report what it is going to do, so we have a chance to review the infomation.

  • Set deletion indicator on unsuccessful RFQs

    Dear Everyone,
    Essentially, the criteria for marking the deletion indicator in unsuccessful RFQs are:
    1/ quotations are not maintained for these RFQs; net price is zero.
    2/ deadline for the submission of the quotation had expired. The fields EKPO-MAHN1, EKPO-MAHN2 & EKPO-MAHN3 are also verified to see if reminders are required to be sent after the quotation deadline. If required, then the RFQs are not appropriate candidates for now.
    3/ if the above criteria is met, a further verification check is made amongst the RFQs with the same collective number to see if any of the RFQs are having quotations maintained, that is, the net price is not zero. One of the quotations (having the same collective number and accepted by the business) will have a quotation comment of “AB1’ or ‘AB2’ and this will be used as a basis for rejecting (updating the rejection indicator) the rest.
    4/ a report program is preferred. It should have key selection criteria like Quotation deadline [select-options], RFQ # [selection-options], quotation deadline [parameter], collective number [parameter – * wildcard acceptable],
    Could anybody please provide solution for this will be appreciated?
    Thanks in advance
    Ravi

    Dear,
    The system sets this status when you release the order, provided that the Order record required indicator is set in the order type-dependent parameters (see Customizing for Process Order)....
    This setting is there in SPRO....
    Production Planning for Process Industries - Process Order-Master Data-Order-Define Order type Dependent parameters...
    In this you set the option Order record Required....
    Requirements are that the process orders are settled, associated PI sheets, inspection lots and any linked purchase orders are complete.
    Following are prerequisites for closing a process order
    1 The order must have the status Released (REL) or Technically completed (TECO)
    2 The order balance must be 0
    3 There can be no open purchase requisitions, purchase orders.
    4 There can be no future change records from confirmation processes.
    .Now Calculate Overheads using Tcode : KGI2 - Individual Processing
    CO43 - Collective Processing
    Step to be follow,
    1.Calculate WIP using Tcode : KKAX - Individual Processing
    KKAO - Collective Processing
    2.Calculate Variance by using Tcode : KKS2 - Individual Processing
    KKS1 - Collective Processing
    3.Finally do the settlement of Order in Tcode : KO88 - Individual Processing
    CO88 - Collective Processing
    Please refer this thread also,
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=17422319&messageID=5934846
    The transaction COA5 (Archive Administration Preprocessing).
    This will allow you to set the deletion flag
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Is there any way to put deletion indicator on sales order

    Hi All
    We are using MTO assembly order concept in our environment. Every sales order item will automatically create a production order. And there were thousands of productions orders which does not have any deletion indicator on them. So when I am running product costing jobs on these production orders, the jobs are running for ever. If I can put a deletion indicator on the production order then my jobs will run faster. To my knowledge, I cannot put the deletion indicator on the assembly order directly and it has to come from Sales order. I do not want to physically delete sales order-But I want to put some kind of deletion indicator on the sales order which will put a deletion indicator on the production order.Is ther any way of doing that?
    Thnaks in adavnce for looking into this

    Hi Michael
    Does the rejection of a line item have any impact on any other scenarios after delivery doc and billing doc wass created?. My manager seems to be doubdtful abt this approach .... does all the companies follow this scenario?.
    Note 308513 says-Deletion indicator should be kept for all the old production orders, but it does not say anything abt the assembly order.

  • Deletion Indicator cannot be unset" error message in PO

    Hi Experts!
    I have a PO in which I deleted a line item, which has been invoice verified, delivered, etc.  Now when I choose to unblock/undelete the line item, it give me error message:  "Deletion Indicator cannot be unset".  Is this a major problem or can it be fixed.  Any information would be greatly appreciated.  Urgent!  Thank you for your time!
    Best Regards,
    WC

    Hi,
    I would say that system should prevent you to delete a line item po with a GR and or invoice entered. For me it should be a bug.
    Now you have done the line item deletion, inconsistency may occur...
    Did you try first to uncheck the final invoice indicator in the PO ?
    Did you check OSS note 1023130 ?
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • PO Deletion indicator cannot be unset

    Hi,
    We want to change a material based Unit of measure from PC to EA, but the material has an open PO.
    1. We delete the PO item first with tcode ME22N then change the Material master (tcode MM02), change the based uom from PC to EA. done.
    2. Then go back to UNDELETE the PO item (ME22N), the following error message is displayed "Deletion indicator cannot be unset".
    How to resolve this error, we need to undelete the PO item after the material's has been changed.?? Urgent.

    Hi Eric,
    Sorry...mmr means material master record...
    1. Reset the BUoM from the new one to the old one
    1a) undelete the POs
    1b) use the mmr with original BUoM (that was reset in 1a) )
    or (reset the BUoM and undelete the POs and) create a new material master with desired BUoM and use this (instead of the original material master with new BUoM if the deleted POs are not OK for you).
    2. Keep the mmr with new BUoM with the delted PO items. As I know you can delete a PO item if GR/IR balance is OK for it so I think it shouldn't be problem.
    2a) If you want to get rid of partially delivered PO items >
    2a1) reste the BUoM from new one to the original
    2a2) undelete the partially delivered POs
    2a3) reduce the qty of these PO items to achieve that the should completely delivered and after that delete them
    2a4) set the new BUoM for your mmr
    2a5) create new PO items instead of the before reduced PO items with proper qty (with the mmr that has the new BUoM).
    BR
    Csaba

  • Scheduling agreement condition type default deletion indicator in backend system

    Dear team,
    our business process is that-
    In SRM system scheduling agreement is created. once its approved from SRM in Backend ECC R3 system the same is getting replicated.
    But in few of the cases its been obserbved that the condition pricing is flowing but with deletion indicator selected by default.
    I have checked the IDOC for the same but there is no value found flowing from SRM to ECC.
    Even searched for the same Material & same vendor in some cases only observed with deletion indicator.
    For entire scheduling agreement the deletion conditions are updating that is for all line item in scheduling agreement.
    There is no info record exists.
    Appreciate if anyone can throw some light over this.

    Appa K wrote:
    Even searched for the same Material & same vendor in some cases only observed with deletion indicator.
    What is the special cases ?
    I hope you are using time dependent condition for you SA document type.
    Check is it fetching from last PO or SA ?
    What is happening, when you are trying to create SA manually via ME31L for the same material and vendor?

  • PR to PO with deletion indicator problem

    Hello,
    I need to one e.g. in conversion process. I have 3 line items and created PR with that.
    Now after creation of PR marked deletion indicator on second line item and save the PR. Now after release when i convert
    this from PR to PO i am not getting proper results. I want to know whether system will be able to create PO for line item 1 and line item 3 and ignore line item 2? . Also i want that both 1 and 3 line items should be one PO, no searate PO should be issued.
    How can we achieve this.
    Thanks
    Himanshu

    Hi Himanshu ,
    By adopting the PR to the PO via the shopping cart button all marked documets of the overview are copied onto the overview.
    As a workaround you could control the selection of PR, you could select the 'open only' checkbox in the selection screen in
    the overview. Then the deleted items should not appear on the overview and therefore will not be adopted to the purchase order.  Another option is to use the 'deletion indicator' in the variant for purchase requistion therfore excluding the
    deleted items in your selection.
    Kind regards,
    Lorraine

  • Set deletion indicator in purchase requisition account assignment

    Hi Guys,
    Can you please help we with the solution to set deletion indicator in purchase requisition account assignment or close purchase requisition. A purchase requisition of $3.600.000,00 was created through Project system Network-External Processing and it has 2 duplicate network activities and $2.246.577,20 was converted to purchase order then $1,353,423 became the network remaining order plan. A purchase order service entry sheet was accepted and the invoice was created. Now Iu2019m experiencing problem when Iu2019m trying to change WBS element and Network system status to TECO in order to remove the remaining order plan of $1,353,423. Iu2019m getting error message number:06411 the procedure I have follow to correct the error is to reduce quantities in the account assignment item and delete superfluous account assignment by setting deletion in each case but I cannot do that because the fields are grey
    Regards
    Sandile

    Hi,
    please check first if the report ZMO_CORRECT_EBKN  from note 739004  can correct the problem.
    I would like to recommend you to check also the note 796973 whether the correction is avalilable in your coding, it should solve the issue.
    In case the problem still persists, please open a ticket to get help from the primary support in area MM-SRV.
    Regards,
    Edit

  • I've lost Norton toolbar, I've lost my printer connection, and your toolbar doesn't have any of the new features you hyped on it - and I've lost any indicator of the security level of a given page, critical!

    How could you foist Firefox 4 off on us without warning about the problems? At least some of your complainants told me how I could get back to v. 3.16, I have saved it and will try to re-install over this.
    I have Windows XP on a 3-year-old computer with fully updated Norton Security. I tried to upgrade to this because all of a sudden you were not supporting the e-banking site that gives me my bank statements. And because I trusted you to do good.

    The new interface is only default on Windows Vista and Windows 7. To get it on Windows XP you need to hide the menu bar. To do that in the View menu select Toolbars, then click on the "Menu Bar" entry.
    If you need access to the menus you can press either Alt or F10 to temporarily display them.
    Symantec need to update their Firefox add-ons so that they are compatible with Firefox 4. They have indicated that for Norton 360 they plan to release an update to Norton 360 to support Firefox 4 in early May - http://us.norton.com/support/kb/web_view.jsp?wv_type=public_web&docurl=20100720113635EN&ln=en_US
    I do not know about the time scale for updates for other Norton products. Pending the update by Symantec, if you want to use the Norton add-ons you will need to downgrade to Firefox 3.6.
    To downgrade to Firefox 3.6 first uninstall Firefox 4, but do not select the option to "Remove my Firefox personal data". If you select that option it will delete your bookmarks, passwords and other user data.
    You can then install the latest version of Firefox 3.6 available from http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html - it will automatically use your current bookmarks, passwords etc.
    To avoid possible problems with downgrading, I recommend going to your profile folder and deleting the following files if they exist - extensions.cache, extensions.rdf, extensions.ini, extensions.sqlite and localstore.rdf. Deleting these files will force Firefox to rebuild the list of installed extensions, checking their compatibility, and reset toolbar customizations.
    For details of how to find your profile folder see https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Profiles

  • How to get the old and new statuses of CAD indicator (DRAW-CADKZ) while changing the status of document (DRAW-DOKST)?

    I want to delete the originals of document while changing the status of document based on CAD indicator status. For this I have implemented BADI DOCUMENT_STATUS01 and the method AFTER_CHANGE_STATUS. From this, the BADI is triggering whenever I am changing the document status and I can able to delete the originals. But here my requirement is to check the CAD indicator status to delete those originals. I.e. whenever the document status will change first time the CAD indicator status will also change. Based on that old and new status of CAD indicator I have to do delete operation.
    If anybody has an idea about SAP documents please help me
    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Ramesh

    First the document is exists in SAP in FR status. But when the CAD system will connect to SAP then the status is changing from ‘FR’ to ‘IN’ after that the CAD Indicator is populating from Blank to ‘X’.
    I want to know in which place the CAD indicator value is changing (any user exits available or any BADI s available when changing the CAD indicator) when connected to CAD system.

  • Issue with setting deletion indicator in PR

    Hi ,
    For a certain sales order, a dummy Purchase Requisition was created and the delivery was also created.
    There was an existing logic in exit  MV50AFZ1  to set the deletion indicator in PR when PGI has been done.
    But when the Goods Issue was done by another user id , Purchase Requistion does not have the delivery indicator set ,as this user ID has no authorization to ME52N.
    Users want to surpass this check for all users who have authorization for Goods Issue , i.e, when any user who has authorization for Goods Issue does the PGI, then the deletion indicator should be set in PR, irrespective of whether he has/has no authorization for ME52N.
    How can I achieve this?
    Is there any place where I can check the authorization for ME52N and then use some other id for PGI so that deletion indicator is automatically set?
    Awaiting response.
    Thanks,
    Neethu

    Thanks Chericheri
    So my code now reads MODIFY <internal table> FROM <work area> INDEX <table control>-current_line transporting <deletion indicator field>.
    Edited by: Brett Cunliffe on Sep 22, 2011 4:44 PM

  • Error in setting deletion indicator to PR's

    Hello all,
    As i was trying to set the Deletion indicator for the selected PR , the error msg was displayed saying * "This item only changeable via the associated production order" *
    How to proceed further??????
    please let me know the TCode of Prod Order and the Steps to be followed
    Regards,
    Preeti.P.G

    you need to select relkated order type...
    if you are getting networks then that means you have selected network type... over there...
    selct respective production order type...
    or tell me what is account assignment catagory in PR check account assignment tab tell me what is account assignment over there.. network , order, WBSE.....
    Venkatesh

  • Table for Maintenance Plan (PM) Delete Indicator..?

    Hii,
    i am developing a report, in that have to check the delete status of Maint Plan (PM). I tried finding in tables like, MPLa, MMPT, MPOS, MHIO, MHIS, even JSTO but was not able to find the delete indicator. Can u suggest the table where i can find the value.
    Thanx,
    Naveen Vishal

    Hi,
    U can look the tables Tj02t and tj30t tables where u can find the delete status of the work order.
    U can get help from the above tables.
    Thanks
    Jatender Narang

Maybe you are looking for