PO Creation referring PREQ

I have following requirements:
1) PO should not be created without the PREQ. Means all purchase order should be created only through PREQ reference. No direct PO creation should be allowed.
2) PO qty should not be greater than the PREQ qty.
I set the message type 06 076 to error. The text of this message displayed is " materials of PREQ 1234 is already ordered in full"
Actually the quantity is not ordered, purchase department is only increasing the qty. The system should give the right message for example similar to "qty exceeding from the PREQ qty"
I searched in SE91 but could not identify any other message. pl suggest what is the right message type for this case or this is the only message type used in this scenario.
Request you to help

Hi,
you can achieve the 1st requirement easily.
to have the restriction for PO creation and always refer you need to create authorization object and assign that to the users.
to create this goto t-code OMET and give the name for this object and make sure that the check box w/o reference is unchecked.
the path is IMG>>MM>>Puchasing>>authorization management>>define functional authorizations.
regards,
Adwait Bachuwar

Similar Messages

  • PReq for Sales Order

    Hi,
    We process quite a number of customer orders for materials not maintained in MARA.
    For this we use one generic HAWA material which receives all specific data on sales order item (description, sales price, etc.)
    This third-party sales order item triggers the creation of PReq.
    Unfortunately we have to enter again manualy on pop-up window (ME51) the contents of several fields already entered just few seconds before on VA01 previous screens.
    Do you know of any "light" (i.e. SAP standard-friendly) solution to my "carry-on" problem?

    Hi,
    Thanks for having looked at my request.
    Sorry but I have thought that it would be enough just to mention HAWA material type.
    So for more clear ideas please consider my third-party selling process is as follows:
    1. VA01 - create sales order item with material Z000010 (HAWA type), enter material description, enter sales price PB00, enter (cost) value and fixed vendor (in pop-up PReq creation screen).
    2. ME21N - create purchase order item with reference to PReq created at step 1.
    Is it more clear now?

  • Creating credit memo request - V1 498 / missing order quantity

    Hi Experts,
    could any of You pls help me with a credit memo creation issue?
    I credit memo needed to be created based on invoice, so configuration  and copy control is done as usual, but I have a failure during CR order creation referring to an invoice F2.
    I got an error message: V1 498 - Credit  already exist for item... - and no qty is transferred to new document
    I have gone thought the threads on Forum, but none of the suggested solution was appropriate to solve the issue:
    - the document flow is updated in copy control ,
    - I can no remove the schedule line flag at VOV7 - the order qty will be missed but target qty is used, and end up incompletition (VU 019 error messge), so billing is faile
    - completition control set as B at VOV7,
    Still have the problem
    Could any of You pls help me - answers will be appreciated.

    V1 498 - Credit already exist for item...
    What the above message means is that lines items have already been used as reference for the creation of credit memo request(s).
    Create a new sales order, delivery and billing document. Then create credit memo request with reference to this new billing document and test.
    In VTAF copy control, at item level, field "Pos./neg. quantity" dictates how the quantity in the source document is affected by copy control.
    PS - I tried to create credit memo with reference to billing document (F2), there were no issues there. Therefore I am taking that the issue is with credit memo request (copied with ref to billing document F2)

  • Relase strategy characteristic with several material groups

    Dear Experts,
    Actually I'm implementing the MM Module, 6.00 version and I have the following issue:
    I created the release strategy Purchase Order, with these characteristics:
    - Material group
    - Net total purchase order
    - Plant
    The error consists in the Material Group characteristic don't run with several Material Groups. It seems that it could be possible only with one Material Group.
    If you know how I could work the characteristics with several material groups, pleas tell me.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Adriana Corredor
    MM SAP Consultant

    Hello, Adriana,
    it isn't clear what you mean by "characteristic don't run with several Material Groups":
    - is it that you cannot enter multiple values in classification? Then check whether you chosed "Multiple Values" in "Value assignment" subscreen of characteristics maintenance, transaction CT04;
    - is it that your release strategy isn't assigned to PREQ with several items with different MATKL values? It is neccessary to realize that if you use the coverall release of PREQ (which I guess you are using), the values of items has to be "summarized" (for purpose of release strategy assignment) into structure CEBAN "Communication Release Strategy Determination: Requisition"; the release strategy classification are then evaluated against this structure; if there is any field which differs for items, it is passed to structure CEBAN as empty; so either you have to have release strategy with MATKL empty, or you can modify the CEBAN content by enhancement M06B0001 "Changes to communication structure for release of requisitions", or you can prevent creation of PREQ with certain not-allowed combination of MATKL via user-exit or badi;
    Kind Regards
    TomT

  • SRM Classic - Automatic PO creation in R/3 only for PReqs based on catalogs

    Dear Experts,
    in SRM 7.0 Classic Scenario, i am facing the following question w.r.t. automatic PO creation on the R/3 side:
    Is it possible to have automatic PO creation in R/3 only for those purchase requisition items, that are based on shopping cart items from a third party punch out catalog?
    The idea is, that the requisitioner on the SRM EBP side shops in a catalog. Once the the SC is approved and the purchase requisition is created in the R/3 system, automatically a PO should be created based on that PReq. This would save the time for the buyer, who do not need to pay attention to this document, because the purchase from the catalog guarantees the buyer, that the already pre-agreed conditions are getting applied.
    But PReqs that are based on Free Text shopping cart EBP items must not be taken into account for the automatic PO creation.
    Is there a way to distinguish between the catalo-based and the non-catalog based PReq positions?
    Thank you.

    Hello Ashutosh,
    thank you very much for that idea!
    I would have the following question w.r.t. to such configuration:
    If i configure that the PO creation for complete SC should happen for a certain purchasing group, would it be somehow possible to arrange that when a Catalog item is put into the shopping cart, that only that certain purchasing group gets defaultet? (the idea behind this is, to leave the free text shopping carts to already known purchasing groups and to keep the purchase requisition as the backend object for this configuration. And additionally to create new purchasing groups, that should be linked to the catalog purchases and to POs as the backend objects).
    Thanks again for the help!

  • Creation of SDEB instead of PReq

    Hi Guys
    I have a concern in MRP results. I am getting SDEB elements instead of PReqs. for externally procured product.
    I understand that MRP will give SDeb (purchase proposal) if MRP execution date is out of opening date and start date of the requirement. However in my case as given below:
    Requirement 1:
    Requirement Date: 30 Oct 2011, Sunday
    GR Time=0
    Opening period=0
    Planned del time = 7
    and MRP date = 23 Jul 2011
    So I expected the MRP should say SDeb, But it showed: Preq on 25 Oct 2011, Tuesday
    Requirement 2: (Same Material, same MRP execution)
    Requirement Date: 29 Jul 2012, Sunday
    GR Time=0
    Opening period=0
    Planned del time = 7
    and MRP date = 23 Jul 2011
    MRP Result: SDeb on 24 Jul 2012, Tuesday
    Also note that the Planning calendar has only Tuesdays in it (not sure if this impacts the decision of SDeb vs Pur Req)
    Can you guys please suggest why is system behaving in this fashion.
    Thanks in advance
    -Rahul

    Hi
    I think you used the parameter 'Create purchase req.' as    2 (Create purchase requisition in the openning period).
    In this case, if the delivery date calculated (e.g. requiement date - lead time like planned delivery tiem) fall in the openning period (The end date of the openning period = current date + openning period of the scheudling margin key) then the purchase requistiion will be created otherwise the planned order will be created. Howver if the openning period of schedule margin key is zero as your case, no purchase requisition can be created as the end date of the openning period cannot be determined.
    You may maintain the enough long time of opennin period to cover the proposals created.
    Or you'd better run mrp with creation indicator 1.
    Furthermore, please note that there is one customization which has higher priority for the creation indicator than the one of initial screen of MRP running transactions.
    Customization: OPPQ, go to the plant, click the button 'Creation indicator' there you would see the same parameters.
    Leon
    Regards.

  • Creation of PO with referance to PR

    Hi,
    I have one requirement,
    Creation of PO with referance PR,but the condition is
    1.It should take the qty from PR
    2.Price should from PIR
    3.This requirement is specific to one Document type ,PR has been created fro MRP and then need to convert the PR to PO.
    I tried with Functional authorization,it is working fine but it is having effect on other document types also.
    Can you please suggest me is there any User Exit available for this.
    Thanks In Advance.
    Jagadish

    Hi
    First configure Release Statergy such that All PR's generated from MRP should be converted into PO  with out Release Procedure  and Other manually generated PRs should be converted in to PO after Release Procedure only......( For that you have to create Doc.type as a one charecter....Table: CEBAN...Field: BSART  and MRP generated PRs should have one document type and Other manually created PRs should have diff. Doc. type)
    Then follow the below steps..
    1)In Material Master,Purchasing view....you maintain Purchasing Group and Check Auto PO Check Box.
    2)In Vendor Master,Purchasing Date view Maintain Purchasing group and check Auto PO Check Box..
    3)Maintain Proper  PIR with Valid Conditions
    Then after creation of PR from MRP...assign source for the PRs IN ME57..
    If you configure release Statergy  such that PRs generated thro MRP need not under go Release procedure ....then go to T.Code: ME59  and convert all PRs in to PO...
    In this way without having any user exit you can solve your problem...We are doing in this way only..
    Reward if useful
    Regards
    S.Baskaran

  • Is there a way to stop creation of invoice that refers delivery items with

    Dear Friends
    I have items in delivery with qty 0 ( this is required for IDOC processing )
    The Invoice was also created with 0 qty  with refrerence to the Delivery,
    is there a way to stop creation of invoice that refers delivery items with zero qty.
    Rgds
    Ravi

    Hi,
    Check the copy control settings in t.code VTFL.
    Go to item details. Check the field routine assigned in copying requirements.
    Copy this routine in t.code VOFM and add further logic to check quantity is not equal to zero, then this new routine in the copying requirements field. Check with ABAP'er.
    Regards,

  • Item Category N (non-stock item) in BOM creation - Preq Generation

    Hi All
    I have a material component that is planned in APO and not in ECC6. We would like to keep the one BOM for the finished good. Problem is that when we perform the backflush in ECC6, the system wants to backflush the material and causes errors due to missing stock.
    So I assigned the material as a non stock item in the BOM but the system will auto generate  a purchase requisitions for Non stock bom components (item category N) when the process order is created. It is possible to turn off the auto creation of the purchase req for non stock bom components? 
    I have tried the following:
    - Explosion type in item data, created new key with 'Switch off planning' indicator set in system configuration
    - created new 'Z' item category with inventory management de-selected
    Both approaches causes system error: Puchase data of material in not maintained
    I also tried leaving as a stock item with the bulk material indicator selected in the item data. This does not work as the cif will then exclude the component when data is transferred to APO
    Funny enough, the system does not generate a purchase req for non stock bom items when using Repetitive Manufacturing. Any help will be greatly appreciated
    kind regards
    Grant brockelbank

    Hello Vivek
    Thank you for your response
    The item is a non stock item. I do not want this item to be backflushed at all. This can be achieved using the 'N' non stock item category but the problem is that the system will attempt to generate a purchase requisition when the process order is created.
    I do not want the system to generate a purchase req in ECC6 as this item is a planning material that is planned in APO (used for medium to long term planning in a simulation version). We are hoping to use the one Bom for ECC6 and APO planning. The generation of the purchase reqs is a bit of a waste as we will never convert them and there is potential to cause issues for purchasing.
    Any other thoughts?
    Thanks again for your help
    kind regards
    Grant

  • Bapi for PO creation with reference to Purchase Requisition - PReq

    Can any one let me know if there is any BAPI to Create PO with reference to PReq. I know we can easily write a BDC for ME21 but... is there a similar functionality via BAPI's ?

    Try
    BAPI_PO_CREATE1
    check its documentation in SE37 for detail documentation..
    Enjoy SAP.
    Pankaj Singh

  • PO creation from One Purchase Requisition

    Dear all;
    In standard SAP We can create multiple PO from A single PReq ,though the full quantity of PReq is taken first time of PO creation .Is there any restriction that After full use PReq quantity no one can use the same PReq for further PO creation.
    Thanking You;
    Regards;
    Joydeep Mukherjee

    Dear Joydeep,
    In contrast to a purchase requisition, it is possible to create more than one PO in reference to a RFQ.
    A RFQ only gives information about the price for which can be ordered from a vendor. The system does therefore not reject you from ordering again from the same vendor with the best conditions.
    Once you create a PO with reference to an RFQ, if the quantity in PR to which the RFQ is refering is exhausted,
    the user is prevented from creating further PO only with reference to the PR. But the user can create Purchase orders refering to a RFQ as long as the validity period of the RFQ is still valid.
    Regards,
    ian, Wong Loke Foong

  • Creation of a Marketing Profile Set based on the standard CRM_MKTTG_BP_BIRTHDATE Infoset thru the WebUI Segment Builder

    Objective: Creation of a Marketing Profile Set based on the standard CRM_MKTTG_BP_BIRTHDATE Infoset thru the WebUI Segment Builder.
    Problems: Standard CRM_MKTTG_BP_BIRTHDATE Infoset DOES NEVER RETURN ANY RESULTS on the segmentation builder of the WebUI client (no matter the filter you specify).
    Other cases:  However if we create a new Data source with data "Extraction from Query" (transaction RS02) based on this standard CRM_MKTTG_BP_BIRTHDATE Infoset and we test the functionality using transaction RSA3, IT DOES RETURN RESULTS (using the same filters as in the segmentation builder)! Of course the segmentation builder works with other attribute lists.
    NEW: IF WE DON’T ESPECIFY ANY SEGMENTATION BASE IN THE PROFILE GROUP, IT DOES RETURN RESULTS!!! (GO TO THE END OF THE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS)
    Steps followed:
    Review Standard Infoset CRM_MKTTG_BP_BIRTHDATE (Transaction SQ02).Review Data Reading Program code: do we have to change the standard code? We have only remove the "BREAK-POINT" statement.
    Creation of a Data source based on the standard CRM_MKTTG_BP_BIRTHDATE Infoset (Transaction CRMD_MKTDS).
    Creation of an Attribute List based on that standard Data source and selection the Birth date as a filter in the Attribute list (Transaction CRMD_MKTDS).
    On the segment builder of the WebUI set any filter (Example: “TODAY”).
    Steps in detail:
    Review Standard Infoset CRM_MKTTG_BP_BIRTHDATE
    SQ02.
    (Image deleted)
    Review Data Reading Program code (Code attached)
    (Image deleted)
    Creation of a Data source based on the standard CRM_MKTTG_BP_BIRTHDATE Infoset
    Data source: Transaction: SPRO – Customer Relationship Management - Marketing – Segmentation - Maintain Data Sources and Attribute Lists: CRMD_MKTDS
    Create Data Source
    (Image deleted)
    Infoset: CRM_MKTTG_BP_BIRTHDATE.
    Business Partner Field: CRMT_MKTTG_IS_BIRTHDATE-PARTNER_GUID
    (Image deleted)
    Result:
    (Image deleted)
    Attribute List
    Creation of the Attribute List
    (Image deleted)
    Assign Data Source:
    (Image deleted)
    Selection of the Birth date as a filter in the Attribute list:
    (Image deleted)
    Result:
    (Image deleted)
    Segment builder of the WebUI:
    Access to WebUI with marketing role.
    Create Segment:
    Creation of Profile Set
    Graphical modeler
    Create Filter: We have already tried many different filters (we already seen notes referring to this matter).
    Example1: “today”
    Count target group. Here I would like to stand out that once you click on the “Count” option, immediately it shows 0 results. In other words, it doesn’t process any information. With other attribute lists it takes some time to process, no matter the filter or the attribute list you use. However if we create a new Data source with data "Extraction from Query" (transaction RS02) based on this standard CRM_MKTTG_BP_BIRTHDATE Infoset and we test the functionality using transaction RSA3, IT DOES RETURN RESULTS (with “today” filter and other)! So it seems that the problem has to do with the segment builder, not the Infoset.
    Result: it never return any results no matter the filter you specify.
    Other cases:
    Creation of a new Data source with data "Extraction from Query" where you enter the name of your new query
    Creation of a Data source based on the standard CRM_MKTTG_BP_BIRTHDATE Infoset
    Standard Infoset CRM_MKTTG_BP_BIRTHDATE:
    We fill the form and select “Extraction from Query”:
    Press SAVE and define which fields will be available for selection and which of them will be visible.
    RSA3: Extractor checker in order to test the Data source:
    We specify the Data source:
    IT DOES RETURN RESULTS:
    ALV Grid:
    NEW: It seems that it has to do with the Segmentation Basis selected in the creation of a Profile Set, because if we do not select any, it does return results. But we need to create this Profile Set based on a particular Segmentation Basis called BS Usuarios Registrados.
    Segment builder – Profile Set of the WebUISegmentation Basis: we leave it in blanc.
    Graphical modeler
    Create Filter: We have already tried many different filters (we already seen notes referring to this matter).
    Example1: “today”
    Count target group.
    Result: IT DOES RETURN RESULTS!!! àConclusion: the problem is the Segmentation Basis
    Define Segmentation Basis:
    Transaction: SPRO – Customer Relationship Management - Marketing – Segmentation – Classic Segmentation - Define Segmentation Basis.BS Usuarios Registrados:
    Define Reports for Creating Segmentation Bases
    Transaction: SPRO – Customer Relationship Management - Marketing – Segmentation – Classic Segmentation - Define Reports for Creating Segmentation BasesZMK_UTL_MGR_SITES_UREG
    Define Usage for Segments:
    Transacción: SPRO – Customer Relationship Management - Marketing – Segmentation – General Settings - Define Usage for Segments.ZBS_UR à02 Segmentatión Basis
    Attribute List:Category:
    There is no Category 02 Segmentatión Basis!!! Why?? Why is not posible to select Category 02 Segmentation Basis in the creation of the Attribute List???
    Usage ID
    NEW: It seems that it has to do with the Segmentation Basis selected in the creation of a Profile Set, because if we do not select any, it does return results. But we need to create this Profile Set based on a particular Segmentation Basis called BS Usuarios Registrados. Why is not posible to select Category 02 Segmentation Basis in the creation of the Attribute List???

    It seems that the standard Infoset doesn’t work by itself with Segmentation Basis. Two SAP notes have been applied and a new Field Group has been added to the Infoset (in order to distint the Segmentation Base).
    CRMT_MKTTG_IS_BIRTHDATE-MGRGUID
    1966298: MGR_GUID is not populated correctly to infoset read program
    2007687:Segmentation InfoSet queries saved with incorrect Master Group
    For that reason we had to create a new Infoset based on the standard CRMT_MKTTG_IS_BIRTHDATE, but adding this new Field MGRGUID to the Group Fields.
    Issue solved

  • HOW TO CONTROL ON CREATION OF SALES ORDER WITH REFERENCE TO EARLIER SO?

    Dear All,
    I want to contol on creation of Sales order with reference to earlier SO?  While creation of sales order our enduser are creating sales order with reference to earlier month SO which I want to restrict. Recently I made changes in sales order like payment terms is grayed, system will atomatically pick pay terms from customer master.Now I am getting correct data also but enduser is using old SO no while creating new SO and old payment data is reflecting in fbl5n.
    I want to restrict enduser while creating new SO with ref. to old SO. Only for returns they should be able to use Billing refrence. Pl. suggest how to control the with reference to ealier SO.
    Nikhil

    Nikhil Deshpande,
          If you dont want allow create a sales order in referent to other one, just delete the copy control between these sales order type, so when the user tries to create a SO in reference to other one a message is displayed that is not possible.
    Thanks,
    Mariano.

  • Creation of a Request in OIM 11G using API's

    Hi Friends,
    I am trying to create a request using OIM 11g API's.
    I am trying to do this for EBS Responsibility resource and this resource has a request dataset has EBS-IT-Resource-Instance, application name, responsibility name, start date and security group. Please note application name, responsibility name, start date and security group are in child form.
    I am trying to populate the request dataset using the below code.
    List<RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute> entityAttrList;
    RequestBeneficiaryEntity entity = null;
    entityAttrList = new ArrayList<RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute>();
    entity = new RequestBeneficiaryEntity();
    tcITResourceInstanceOperationsIntf tcITResourceIntf = Platform.getService(tcITResourceInstanceOperationsIntf.class);
    HashMap searchcriteria = new HashMap<String, String>();
    searchcriteria.put("IT Resources.Name", "EBSHF-APPS12");
    tcResultSet resultSet = tcITResourceIntf.findITResourceInstances(searchcriteria);
    long itResourceKey=resultSet.getLongValue("IT Resources.Key");
    entityAttrList.add(this.getAttrLong("eBusiness Suite Instance Name",itResourceKey));
    entityAttrList.add(this.getAttr("Application Name","3~300"));
    entityAttrList.add(this.getAttr("Responsibility Name", "3~300~52281"));
    entityAttrList.add(this.getAttr("Security Group", "3~0"));
    entity.setEntityKey(getResourceKey("Oracle eBusiness Responsibility"));
    entity.setEntityType(RequestConstants.RESOURCE);
    entity.setEntitySubType("Oracle eBusiness Responsibility");
    entity.setEntityData(entityAttrList);
    private RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute getAttr(String name, String value)
    RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute attr = null;
    attr = new RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute(name, value, RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute.TYPE.String);
    return attr;
    private RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute getAttrLong(String name, long value)
    RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute attr = null;
    attr = new RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute(name, value, RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute.TYPE.Long);
    return attr;
    My code is working fine and a request is getting created. But when I try to open the request dataset(object form) for the newly created request, I am getting null exceptions.
    If I did not populate the fields that are in the child form application name, responsibility name and security group which are highlighted above, then I am able to view the form with the correct IT-Resource-Instance name after request creation.
    So, I am thinking I am doing something wrong while populating child form data in the request dataset.
    Can you please provide me some code snippet to populate the child using 11G API'S?

    Hi Bikash,
    After referring your code, i made changes in mine. Here is my updated code.
    RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute parantAttr=null;
    List<RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute> entityAttrList;
    RequestBeneficiaryEntity entity = null;
    entity = new RequestBeneficiaryEntity();
    parantAttr=this.getAttrLong("eBusiness Suite Instance Name", itResourceKey);
    RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute mid1 = new RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute();
    List <RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute> childAttributesList = new ArrayList<RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute>();
    childAttributesList.add(this.getAttr("Application Name", "3~555"));
    childAttributesList.add(this.getAttr("Responsibility Name", "3~555~22862"));
    childAttributesList.add(this.getAttr("Security Group", "3~0"));
    mid1.setChildAttributes(childAttributesList);
    mid1.setAction(RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute.ACTION.Add);
    entityAttrList = new ArrayList<RequestBeneficiaryEntityAttribute>();
    entityAttrList.add(parantAttr);
    entityAttrList.add(mid1);
    But when I try to run this, it is getting failed saying "RequestServiceException: IAM-2050033:Invalid attribute name null. No corresponding reference was found in the data set ProvisionResourceOracle eBusiness Responsibility".
    Here is my request data set for your reference.
    <AttributeReference name="eBusiness Suite Instance Name" attr-ref="eBusiness Suite Instance Name" type="Long" length="50" widget="itresource-lookup" required="true" available-in-bulk="true" itresource-type="eBusiness Suite UM"/>
    <AttributeReference available-in-bulk="true" length="10" widget="text" type="String" attr-ref="UD_EBH_RSCP" name="EBS HR Foundation User Responsibilities">
    <AttributeReference name="Application Name" attr-ref="Application Name" type="String" length="256" widget="lookup-query" available-in-bulk="true" required="true">
    <lookupQuery lookup-query="select lkv_encoded as Value,lkv_decoded as Description from lkv lkv, lku lku where lkv.lku_key=lku.lku_key and lku_type_string_key='Lookup.EBS.Application' and lkv_encoded like concat('$Form data.eBusiness Suite Instance Name', '~%')" display-field="Description" save-field="Value"/>
    </AttributeReference>
    <AttributeReference name="Responsibility Name" attr-ref="Responsibility Name" type="String" length="256" widget="lookup-query" available-in-bulk="true" required="true" primary="true">
    <lookupQuery lookup-query="select lkv_encoded as Value,lkv_decoded as Description from lkv lkv,lku lku where lkv.lku_key=lku.lku_key and lku_type_string_key='Lookup.EBS.Responsibility' and lkv_encoded like concat('$Form data.Application Name','~%')" display-field="Description" save-field="Value"/>
    </AttributeReference>
    <AttributeReference name="Security Group" attr-ref="Security Group" type="String" length="256" widget="lookup-query" available-in-bulk="true" required="true">
    <lookupQuery lookup-query="select lkv_encoded as Value,lkv_decoded as Description from lkv lkv, lku lku where lkv.lku_key=lku.lku_key and lku_type_string_key='Lookup.EBS.SecurityGroup' and lkv_encoded like concat('$Form data.eBusiness Suite Instance Name', '~%')" display-field="Description" save-field="Value"/>
    </AttributeReference>
    I am not sure why it is not referencing to the attribute. In your blog, it is saying your code is to set process form. But i am trying to create a request using API's. so, I need some code snippet to populate request dataset. Do you think, this will serve both?
    Thanks for your help.

  • Creation of Database link and access the same plus Snapshot creation

    i want talk between two oracle server. i decided to go for snapshot creation with periodical refresh. For which i am having two oracle server's with different ip address located inside our office setup.
    I have created a database link between two servers.
    first server name global
    userid scott
    password tiger
    second server name asil
    userid scott
    password tiger
    both the user have been given dba rights.
    in both the server the services and listners are all started. i gave the following command to create database link.
    from asil server
    create public database link global connect by scott identified by tiger using 'global'
    the command was successful and the link was created. Now i tried to access a table of the scott user of the global server.
    select * from emp@global;
    now it is giving error. I want to know how the link can be created and how it can be accessed. i refered the 8i online documentation and done the things based on that. i expect valuble solution from all possible persons
    null

    A reason for this problem could be that your database is configured that a database link has to have exactly the same name like the global name of the database instance it should connect to.
    Can you please provide the oracle error code / message ? With this information there might be more hints I can give you.

Maybe you are looking for