Po match with receipts
hi all
i have a doubt
the accounts ppl are not able to match PO with receipt for a particular PO
when i checked
that particular PO has invoice match option to PO
this PO is for two items but in POabc super user-receiving-receipts -only one item has been received
the supplier set up is invoice match option to Receipts
so they should be able to do the match right
kindly guide
Hi
i have changed supplier setting Controlinvoice match option to PO(it was receipts initially)
and have asked the accounts ppl to do the matching and let me know so i can reverse the setting of supplier back to original.
Similar Messages
-
Receipt Qty in AP invoice does not match with actual receipt qty.
Hello everyone,
I am facing an issue in oracle Payables module. When we match invoice with receipt while preparing invoices, Quantity received shown in the Receipt quantity block in invoice window does not match with actual receipt quantity of that item. Due to this difference user is not able to book the invoice. Please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Himanshu GuptaExactly. What i mean is in the invoice window, There is a block called reciept quantity shown in the lower part. The received quantity displayed in that block is more the actual quantity being recieved. (when we see the recieving transactions). is this a bug?
thanks for your reply, awaiting your response......
Himanshu Gupta -
GR Value is not matching with PO Value while posting good receipt.
Hi Experts,
My client has raised the PO with accounts assignment category K (COST CENTRE) with material description.
but he has received invoice receipt before good receipt.while invoice receipt he has entered wrong value for some qty as per PO intially and cancelled that wrong entry.
I have gone through original & cancelled invoice document accounting entries. below is entries:
Original invoice document accounting entries:
GR/IR Clearing account: Debited
Vendor account: Credited
during cancelling the above document it should be vendor acc is debited and GR/IR account is credited but in the system below entries taken place
Cancelled invoice document accounting entries:
Vendor account : Debited
GR/IR Account : Credited
Consumption Account : Credited
Why consumption acc taken place here. pls help what are the possibilitis....
these entries affecting good receipt value means while taking goods receipt for some qty out of full qty value is not matching with PO value.
but while cancelling the GR documents system taking correct values as per PO. Please help.
Kindly help in this regards
Regards
MohanHi,
Check the Credit Memo document whether G/L tab is there & whether any G/L account is entered ?
I think instead of cancelling the MIRO document they might have posted a vendor credit memo manually by specifying a consumption GL.
Thanks & Regards, -
Quantity good receipt not match with the PO/ BOM quantity ( material subcon
Dear Expert,
When I did the first MIGO for material subcontracting the quantity is exactly the same (match) with the PO and BOM,
but when I did the second MIGO, the quantity is not the same anymore. There is variant between MIGO and the PO quantity
what is the problem, and why does it happen?
if can please do reply me as soon as possible
Thanks
PaulineHi Pauline,
What do you think of exactly? Component quantity or the quantity of the main item (F-30 material)?
Please describe your problem more exactly (if possible trough an example) as well as the steps you did.
remark:
I would suggest that you should post such question in MM forum (your chance would be higher to get answer):
SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Regards,
Csaba -
Inventory Valuated Stock Value is not matching with R/3
Dear Friends,
we are in a big mess.Needed your help urgently
We are in sap netweaver 2004s.We are implementing the standard business content only for one of our client.We have loaded the Inventory data into BW by following "How to handle the Inventory Management" document.
We have loaded the inventory data into 0IC_C03 using standard transferrules and update rules.
The sequence we followed as:
IN R/3
Filled the setup tables for during the posting free time(non-business hours)
Stock intialization
Material Movements
Evaluations
IN BW
We had loaded the data into only 0IC_C03 cube using standard update rules(no changes done)
2LIS_03_BX-Generate intial stock with no marker update unchecked
2LIS_03_BF-Full update with no marker update checked
2LIS_03_UM-Full update with no marker update checked
When we compared the data between R/3 and BW they are many materials "Valuated Stock Value" is not matching with R/3.For some materials value is matching with R/3 but for some other materials its not matching with R/3.Some materials are showing the negative figures for Valuated Stock Value.
But the valuated quantity value is exactly matching with R/3 for all the materials.
We have tryed to many ways in the past 10 days to find out the solution.We have followd the notes 589024 and implemented the formula.But no luck so far.
Needed your help..Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
Please help us with your inputs.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
SoujanyaHi Sudheer,
No We haven't implemented this note.
In start routine we already have the first start routine in the note.
INSERT BEGIN
loop at DATA_PACKAGE.
if DATA_PACKAGE-stockcat eq 'V' or
DATA_PACKAGE-stocktype eq 'V'.
delete DATA_PACKAGE.
endif.
endloop.
if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
ABORT = 0.
INSERT END
We should comment the above start routine and follow the remaining section as below?
==========================================================
Notes:
However, if you want a report of these consumption values, proceed as follows:
1. Do not use the start routine listed above.
2. Create two new key figures (cumulative values):
1. Material consumption value (ZVERWERT, for example) with unit 0BASE_UOM
2. Material consumption quantity (ZVERMENGE, for example) with unit 0LOC_CURRCY
3. Include these in the InfoCube definition.
4. Update these key figures from 2LIS_03_BF as follows:
-> material consumption value:
IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '100' "Other Issues
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '101' "Returns / Vendor
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '104' "Material Transfer
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '105' "Stock Adjustment InvD
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '106' "Stock Adjustment Other
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '110' ) "Issues from Stock
"Transfers
AND COMM_STRUCTURE-bwapplnm EQ 'MM'
only movements which are relevant for stock control
AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
result value of the routine
RESULT = -1 * COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
RETURNCODE = 0.
ELSEIF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '000' "Other Receipts
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '001' "Goods Receipt/Vendor
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '004' "Material Transfer/"Receipt
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '005' "Stock Adjustment InvD
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '006' "Stock Adjustment Other
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '010' ) "Receipt from Stock
"Transfer
only movements which are relevant for stock control
AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
result value of the routine
RESULT = COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
RETURNCODE = 0.
ELSE.
if the returncode is not equal zero, the result will not be updated
RETURNCODE = 4.
ENDIF.
if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
ABORT = 0..
-> material consumption quantity:
The code is the same, but COMM_STRUCTURE-cpquabu replaces COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
-> The characteristic value calculation is the same for the other key figures.
5. Update these key figures from the 2LIS_03_UM in the same way.
======================================================= -
Hello All,
I need to develop a query for "Non Matched PO receipts" with the fo;;woing columns
Supplier Code
Spplier Name
quantity received (NOT MATCHED)
unit price
currency
exchange rate
receiving date
payment term (assigned to PO)
so i have wrtiten the following query but it is not returing data is my query correct
select pv.vendor_type_lookup_code Supplier_code,
pv.vendor_name Supplier_name,
rsl.quantity_received,
aida.unit_price,
aida.Exchange_rate,
aia.invoice_currency_code,
att.name Payment_term
from AP_Invoices_All aia,
aP_invoice_distributions_all aida,
PO_vendors pv,
AP_TERMS_TL att,
rcv_transactions rt,
rcv_shipment_lines rsl
where aia.vendor_id=pv.vendor_id
and aia.invoice_id=aida.invoice_id
and aida.po_distribution_id is null
and aia.terms_id=att.term_id
and aida.rcv_transaction_id = rt.transaction_id
and rt.shipment_line_id = rsl.shipment_line_id
Thanks,
KumarHi,
Whenever you need help on this forum, post:
(1) The version of Oracle (and any other relevant software) you're using
(2) A little sample data (just enough to show what the problem is) from all the relevant tables
(3) The results you want from that data
(4) Your best attempt so far
Executable SQL statements (like "CREATE TABLE AS ..." or "INSERT ..." statements) are best for (2).
If you can present your problem using commonly available tables (for example, tables in scott schema, or views in the data dictionary), then you can omit (2).
Formatted tabular output is okay for (3). Type {code} before and after the tabular text, to preserve spacing.
You've already done (4), but it would be better if you could use {code} tags around that, too: it's hard to read without any formatting. -
How to close PO after fully matched with invoice only
Hi,
We wan't to use 3-way match, but when an invoice is fully matched with the po we want
the status of the po gets closed. Now it's still open untill you do a receipt for the po.
We need the QTY REC matchinghold to send the invoices for approval if the
receipts is not available before the invoice is matched with the po.
How can I set this up?you are correct. That functionality is not available in iprocurement
Refer note:
The Initial Quantity Received Satisfies the Receipt Closing Tolerance (Doc ID 168495.1)
An Enhancement request is already logged:
16438982 - ABILITY TO RECEIVE ITEMS IN IPROCUREMENT AFTER PO IS CLOSED -
PO : Invoice value in ME23N is not matching with 2LIS_02_SCL field BWGEO
Hi Expert,
1) Invoice value in ME23N tcode is not matching with datasource 2LIS_02_SCL field BWGEO in item level
for few item BWGEO field contain the data with tax but for few item the value is not coming correctly.
2) The value is not matching for that particular item which has same material document in other Item level.
eg. PO(eg 60000XXXXX) if item 1 has invoice value with tax is 1300+52 and its material doc is XXXX1234. if same material doc XXXX1234 is present in
item 2 for another invoice of same material invoice value with tax is 1200+48. In that case the value which is coming in
BWGEO field is 1300 only.
I am working in 7.0 system for AFS specific. My whole transaction is in INR.
Thanks and Regards
Lalit KumarPlease review the information below from one of our deverlopers
- it may explain the behaviour you are seeing on your system:
When posting a GOODS RECEIPT for a DELTA UPLOAD process you only will
have the information regarding the GOODS RECEIPT values (XMCEKET-WEMNG
and XMCEKET-WEWRT) and not the invoice values (XMCEKET-REMNG and
XMCEKET-REWRT).
When posting an INVOICE for a DELTA UPLOAD process you only will
have the information regarding the INVOICE values (XMCEKET-REMNG
and XMCEKET-REWRT) and not the GOODS RECEIPT values (XMCEKET-WEMNG and
XMCEKET-WEWRT).
The DELTA INIT process is different, because for this process, all
information about posted documents against a purchasing order need to
processed again and this means that all documents related to an order
(invoices, goods receipt, deliver costs, goods issue, etc)
are read from database and rebuild one by one in the same process, and
of course this information in available.
When posting an invoice, the goods receipt information is not
available because of the following reasons:
1 - System standard fields.
In datasource 2LIS_02_SCL, there is only
fields BWMNG - that represents quantity, BWGEO and BWGEO that
represent values. The information under these fields are dependent
from the information of field BWVORG (BW transaction key). This field
determines whether these values are from a purchasing order, goods
receipt or an invoice. You never have a missing information, but when
you want to get goods receipt values, you need to check where the
BWVORG correspond to goods receipt process and not invoice.
2 - Performance
There are documents as purchasing orders and schedule agreements that
are opened for years in some customer system (it may not be your case),
where goods receipt and invoices have been posted during all this time.
Every time that a new document is posted in order to built the
cancellation sentence (ROCANCEL = X) and in order to add the new
value in the old, system need to process all previous posted documents,
and this means processing time. For this reason when posting invoices
only previous documents that are invoices are taken into account and
not goods receipt.
The delta fields, DBWMNG and DBWGEO, are the difference between the
purchasing order quantity and values and the goods receipt quantity
and values, then is natural that this information is only available
when processing a goods receipt and not when processing an invoice.
I'm sorry if this is not the system behavior that you are expecting,
but this is the normal standard behavior and this is really necessary
because of the system performance when dealing with documents that
have a long order history.
Hope this information is useful for you
Best Regards
Barry -
Dear All,
I have to develop a report for "Matched PO receipts" with the following columns:
Receipt Date
Receipt Number
PO Number
Supplier Code
Supplier Name
Amount
Please look at this query, Could this solved my problem?
select to_char(rt.transaction_date,'yyyy-mm-dd')rct_date
,rsh.receipt_num rct_number
,pha.segment1 po_number
,rsh.vendor_id
,pv.vendor_name
,pvsa.vendor_site_code vendor_site
,sum(rt.amount_billed)amount
from rcv_transactions rt
,rcv_shipment_lines rsl
,rcv_shipment_headers rsh
,po_headers_all pha
,po_vendors pv
,po_vendor_sites_all pvsa
,po_distributions_all pda
,ap_invoice_distributions_all aida
where rt.shipment_line_id = rsl.shipment_line_id
and rsl.shipment_header_id = rsh.shipment_header_id
and rt.po_header_id = pha.po_header_id
and rsh.vendor_id = pvsa.vendor_id
and rsh.vendor_site_id = pvsa.vendor_site_id
and pvsa.vendor_id = pv.vendor_id
and rt.po_header_id = pda.po_header_id
and pda.po_distribution_id = aida.po_distribution_id
and rt.transaction_id = aida.rcv_transaction_id
and to_char(rt.transaction_date ,'yyyy/mm/dd')||' 00:00:00' between :p_date_from and :p_date_to
and rt.organization_id = :p_unit
group by to_char(rt.transaction_date,'yyyy-mm-dd')
,pha.segment1
,rsh.receipt_num
,rsh.vendor_id
,pv.vendor_name
,pvsa.vendor_site_code
order by 1,to_number(rsh.receipt_num)Hi,
Instead of taking the amount billed from rcv_transactions, you can take this value from ap_invoice_distributions_all. The query looks good, but what about the performance of this query?
Regards,
Jyoti -
Error : Profit Center does not match with Business Area. Message no. ZGLTFI
Hi Everyone,
Error occurs when doing inbound PGR. Processed done so far are the following:
Normal PO created & released.
Inbound created
Transfer order created and confirmed.
When doing PGR via VL32N > click Post Goods Receipt error occurs
Profit Center does not match with Business Area
Message no. ZGLTFI0001031
Checked already in KE53 the Profit Center used was assigned to the Co. Code used in the PO.
The same Profit Center was maintained in material master.
The Plant used was assigned to proper division and business area.
Any other ways to check?
Btw not only in Inbound PGR the error occurs .. also happened in MIGO and MB1C.
Tried to do other transaction involing the material, plant and profit center all give the same error.
Any info shared is much appreciated.
Thank you.this error is not a SAP standard error, it is an own message class (ZGLTFI0001), so it must be issued from a validation or user exit. Please find the user exit, or talk to FI Team and ask what they check
-
IMEI no on this phone does not match with service providers records as a replacement was issued from Apple in an insurance claim. The service provider Vodafone will not unlock this phone without proof of purchase which we have but the receipt does not record the EMEI no.
Contact Apple http://support.apple.com/kb/HE57
-
Hi,
Would like to ask if there's any documentation that suggests 3-way match (PO-GR-IR) in a computer system with the addition of paper as a best practice for checks and balances?
Hope to hear from you soon.Hmm, an interesting situation. What are the quantities on your purchase orders? Are they almost always a quantity of 1? Payables should only close a purchase order when quantity billed and quantity received is GT or equal to the quantity ordered. So if you order a quantity of 10, you could match for quantity 5 on the first invoice, quantity 3 for the second invoice, and quantity 2 for the final invoice. But since you don't receive the quantity until the 3rd invoice, you cannot match on receipts, so that would be a problem.
Maybe you need to approach this from a different angle? Maybe you should look at the prepayments ability in Payables. Typically Prepayments will be charged to a Prepayment Account (asset). Say you have a purchase order for $10,000. You prepay $5,000 up front, so basically Debit Prepayment 5,000 and Credit Cash 5,000. Same for the next prepayment level - $3,000. Then you get the ordered material received. So you want to do an invoice for $10,000. Match the invoice to the purchase order. Apply the prepayments to the purchase order. Thus you get an entry something like Debit Inventory $10,000, Credit Prepayments $8,000, and Credit Cash $2,000.
From an accounting perspecitive, you don't show the prepayments in inventory until received, but do show a prepayment asset. Which is reflecting what you really are doing I think.
I have never worked for anyone who has had to do prepayments, but this is an area that you may wish to investigate as a possible solution for your situation. Good luck.
John Dickey -
Query of 3 Way match ( Invoice-Receipt)
Hi All,
Can Someone please give me Matching Invoice Query (AP) / Steps for 3-way matching. I have requirement wherein I have to match Invoice with Receipt but I don't know how should i do that through coding or required steps.
As I know I know below conditions are required for 3 way match but dont know how should I get all these individual data from AP tables.
Invoice price <= Purchase order price
Quantity billed <= Quantity Ordered
Quantity billed <= Quantity received
Can you please help me to get this information.
Thanks.I have prepared queries based on d 3-way match functionality .. Can some one please verify this, if I am missing anything here -
-- Invoice price <= Purchase order price
SELECT sum((NVL(poll.quantity, 0) - NVL(poll.quantity_cancelled, 0)) *
NVL(pol.unit_price, 0)) "PO PRICE",
sum(apd.quantity_invoiced * apd.unit_price) "INVOICE PRICE"
FROM po_headers_all poh,
po_lines_all pol,
po_line_locations_all poll,
po_distributions_all pd,
ap_invoice_distributions_all apd
WHERE poh.po_header_id = pol.po_header_id AND
pol.po_line_id = poll.po_line_id AND
poll.po_header_id = pol.po_header_id AND
poh.authorization_status = 'APPROVED' AND
poh.type_lookup_code = 'STANDARD' AND
NVL(poh.cancel_flag, 'N') = 'N' AND POL.ITEM_ID IS NOT NULL AND
apd.unit_price < pol.unit_price AND
-- AND NVL (poll.quantity, 0) > (NVL (poll.Quantity_received,0) + NVL (poll.Quantity_cancelled,0))
poll.inspection_required_flag = 'N' AND
poll.receipt_required_flag = 'Y' and
pd.po_header_id = poh.po_header_id(+) AND
poll.po_header_id = pd.po_header_id AND
pd.po_line_id = pol.po_line_id AND
pd.line_location_id = poll.line_location_id AND
apd.po_distribution_id = pd.po_distribution_id AND
POH.po_header_id = ? AND apd.po_distribution_id is not null
-- Quantity billed <= Quantity Ordered
SELECT sum(pd.quantity_ordered) "Quantity Ordered",
sum(pd.quantity_billed) "Quantity Billed"
--sum(apd.quantity_invoiced) "Quantity billed"
FROM po_headers_all poh,
po_lines_all pol,
po_line_locations_all poll,
po_distributions_all pd,
ap_invoice_distributions_all apd
WHERE poh.po_header_id = pol.po_header_id AND
pol.po_line_id = poll.po_line_id AND
poll.po_header_id = pol.po_header_id AND
poh.authorization_status = 'APPROVED' AND
poh.type_lookup_code = 'STANDARD' AND
NVL(poh.cancel_flag, 'N') = 'N' AND POL.ITEM_ID IS NOT NULL AND
apd.unit_price < pol.unit_price
-- AND NVL (poll.quantity, 0) > (NVL (poll.Quantity_received,0) + NVL (poll.Quantity_cancelled,0))
and POH.po_header_id = ? and poll.inspection_required_flag = 'N' AND
poll.receipt_required_flag = 'Y' and
pd.po_header_id = poh.po_header_id(+) AND
poll.po_header_id = pd.po_header_id AND
pd.po_line_id = pol.po_line_id AND
pd.line_location_id = poll.line_location_id and
apd.po_distribution_id = pd.po_distribution_id and
apd.po_distribution_id is not null
--Quantity billed <= Quantity received
SELECT sum(rsl.QUANTITY_RECEIVED) "Quantity received"
from rcv_transactions rct,
rcv_shipment_headers rsh,
rcv_shipment_lines rsl,
po_lines pol,
po_line_locations pll
where rct.po_line_location_id = pll.line_location_id and
rct.po_line_id = pol.po_line_id and
nvl(pol.order_type_lookup_code, 'QUANTITY') NOT IN
('RATE', 'FIXED PRICE') and
rct.shipment_line_id = rsl.shipment_line_id and
rsl.shipment_header_id = rsh.shipment_header_id and
transaction_type = 'RECEIVE' and pol.po_header_id = ?
order by rct.transaction_id -
CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values
Dear Members,
The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
Any help/clues?
Regards
SatyaHi,
In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
regards
Waman -
0FC_OP_01 extractor issues- DFFKKOPBW data not matching with
Hi All
We have an issue with the extractor 0FC_OP_01. Our business is comparing the values in
R/3 report u2013 G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277) with the
Open Items by GL Account report in BW .(actually these values in the BW report are coming from DFKKOPBW table in R/3) .
But since august, the R/3 G/L account balance report is not matching with the DFKKOPBW table balances. So bottom line the extractor 0FC_OP_01 is doing something wrong when populating the DFKKOPBW table which is causing these two reports to be out of balance
Did anybody face this kind of issue before? Please Advise.
FYI : We are following the same procedure to populate the DFKKOPBW table as in the below article.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a9996115-0b01-0010-b2b2-d9de0170a425;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID0001499250DB01896329908162586522End
Thanks
KPKIn my case the Cube/PSA data itself is not matching with the R/3 report data.
Basically we run a job in R/3 in t-code FPBW with a Date id and Indentification. This job will pull the entries from base table DFKKOP into DFKKOPBW table .Then FRom this DFKKOPBW table data is loaded into PSA/Cube.
Here in my case the data in table DFKKOPBW itself is not matching with the R/3 report - G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)) .
I am following the same procedure to run the JOb in T-code FPBW to populate the DFKKOPBW table as listed in the document at the above link. Moreover this difference in balances is occuring only starting from August ..Till July the balances in DFKKOPBW tally with the R/3report.
Please advise ..
Thanks
KPK
Maybe you are looking for
-
my brother hooked my phone up to his computer and now it asks me to sign into his apple id when i try to download an app, how do i change it to mine? i have already signed out and back in but it wil not work
-
Aliases have disappeared from Mail and I am left with one email address!!
For no apparent reason all my email aliases have gone and I have the choice of one! Does anyone know how I can retrieve them? Thanks, Kevin
-
Why ASA creates self assigned certificate on each reboot
Hi Everyone, I noticed "By default, the security appliance has a self-signed certificate that is regenerated every time the device is rebooted. We can purchase your own certificate from vendors, such as Verisign t, or you can configure the ASA to
-
Hi, I've got a production batch processing setup where my j000 job grows to over 2Gb of memory. It doesn't seem to share with the other job queue processes. I have a setting of 10. oracle 31082 0.3 6.4 2483684 2112444 ? Ss May16 57:32 ora_j000_conp o
-
it says that i have to pay again to download it from itunes.. how can i get the game in my itunes and phone? do I accept the charges and it will be re-embersed? what should I do? I have the order confirmation number etc.