Po match with receipts

hi all
i have a doubt
the accounts ppl are not able to match PO with receipt for a particular PO
when i checked
that particular PO has invoice match option to PO
this PO is for two items but in POabc super user-receiving-receipts -only one item has been received
the supplier set up is invoice match option to Receipts
so they should be able to do the match right
kindly guide

Hi
i have changed supplier setting Controlinvoice match option to PO(it was receipts initially)
and have asked the accounts ppl to do the matching and let me know so i can reverse the setting of supplier back to original.

Similar Messages

  • Receipt Qty in AP invoice does not match with actual receipt qty.

    Hello everyone,
    I am facing an issue in oracle Payables module. When we match invoice with receipt while preparing invoices, Quantity received shown in the Receipt quantity block in invoice window does not match with actual receipt quantity of that item. Due to this difference user is not able to book the invoice. Please help me to resolve this issue.
    Thanks,
    Himanshu Gupta

    Exactly. What i mean is in the invoice window, There is a block called reciept quantity shown in the lower part. The received quantity displayed in that block is more the actual quantity being recieved. (when we see the recieving transactions). is this a bug?
    thanks for your reply, awaiting your response......
    Himanshu Gupta

  • GR Value is not matching with PO Value while posting good receipt.

    Hi Experts,
    My client has raised the PO with accounts assignment category K (COST CENTRE) with material description.
    but he has received invoice receipt before good receipt.while invoice receipt he has entered wrong value for some qty as per PO intially and cancelled that wrong entry.
    I have gone through original & cancelled invoice document accounting entries. below is entries:
    Original invoice document accounting entries:
    GR/IR Clearing account: Debited
    Vendor account: Credited
    during cancelling the above document it should be vendor acc is debited and GR/IR account is credited but in the system below entries taken place
    Cancelled invoice document accounting entries:
    Vendor account : Debited
    GR/IR Account : Credited
    Consumption Account : Credited
    Why consumption acc taken place here. pls help what are the possibilitis....
    these entries affecting good receipt value means while taking goods receipt for some qty out of full qty value is not matching with PO value.
    but while cancelling the  GR documents system taking correct values as per PO. Please help.
    Kindly help in this regards
    Regards
    Mohan

    Hi,
    Check the Credit Memo document whether G/L tab is there & whether any G/L account is entered ?
    I think instead of cancelling the MIRO document they might have posted a vendor credit memo manually by specifying a consumption GL.
    Thanks & Regards,

  • Quantity good receipt not match with the PO/ BOM quantity ( material subcon

    Dear Expert,
    When I did the first MIGO for material subcontracting the quantity is exactly the same (match)  with the PO and BOM,
    but when I did the second MIGO, the quantity is not the same anymore. There is variant between MIGO and the PO quantity
    what is the problem, and why does it happen?
    if can please do reply me as soon as possible
    Thanks
    Pauline

    Hi Pauline,
    What do you think of exactly? Component quantity or the quantity of the main item (F-30 material)?
    Please describe your problem more exactly (if possible trough an example) as well as the steps you did.
    remark:
    I would suggest that you should post such question in MM forum (your chance would be higher to get answer):
    SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
    Regards,
    Csaba

  • Inventory Valuated Stock Value is not matching with R/3

    Dear Friends,
    we are in a big mess.Needed your help urgently
    We are in sap netweaver 2004s.We are implementing the standard business content only for one of our client.We have loaded the Inventory data into BW by following "How to handle the Inventory Management" document.
    We have loaded the inventory data into 0IC_C03 using standard transferrules and update rules.
    The sequence we followed as:
    IN R/3
    Filled the setup tables for during the posting free time(non-business hours)
    Stock intialization
    Material Movements
    Evaluations
    IN BW
    We had loaded the data into only 0IC_C03 cube using standard update rules(no changes done)
    2LIS_03_BX-Generate intial stock with no marker update unchecked
    2LIS_03_BF-Full update with no marker update checked
    2LIS_03_UM-Full update with no marker update checked
    When we compared the data between R/3 and BW they are many materials "Valuated Stock Value" is not matching with R/3.For some materials value is matching with R/3 but for some other materials its not matching with R/3.Some materials are showing the negative figures for Valuated Stock Value.
    But the valuated quantity value is exactly matching with R/3 for all the materials.
    We have tryed to many ways in the past 10 days to find out the solution.We have followd the notes 589024 and implemented the formula.But no luck so far.
    Needed your help..Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
    Please help us with your inputs.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Soujanya

    Hi Sudheer,
    No We haven't implemented this note.
    In start routine we already have the first start routine in the note.
    INSERT BEGIN
      loop at DATA_PACKAGE.
        if DATA_PACKAGE-stockcat eq 'V' or
           DATA_PACKAGE-stocktype eq 'V'.
          delete DATA_PACKAGE.
        endif.
      endloop.
    if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
      ABORT = 0.
    INSERT END
    We should comment the above start routine and follow the remaining section as below?
    ==========================================================
    Notes:
    However, if you want a report of these consumption values, proceed as follows:
    1. Do not use the start routine listed above.
    2. Create two new key figures (cumulative values):
       1. Material consumption value (ZVERWERT, for example) with unit 0BASE_UOM
       2. Material consumption quantity (ZVERMENGE, for example) with unit 0LOC_CURRCY
    3. Include these in the InfoCube definition.
    4. Update these key figures from 2LIS_03_BF as follows:
    -> material consumption value:
    IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '100'   "Other Issues
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '101'   "Returns / Vendor
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '104'   "Material Transfer
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '105'   "Stock Adjustment InvD
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '106'   "Stock Adjustment Other
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '110' ) "Issues from Stock
                                                "Transfers
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-bwapplnm EQ 'MM'
    only movements which are relevant for stock control
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
       AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
    result value of the routine
        RESULT = -1 * COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
    if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
        RETURNCODE = 0.
    ELSEIF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '000'   "Other Receipts
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '001'   "Goods Receipt/Vendor
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '004'   "Material Transfer/"Receipt
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '005'   "Stock Adjustment InvD
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '006'   "Stock Adjustment Other
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '010' ) "Receipt from Stock
                                                "Transfer
    only movements which are relevant for stock control
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
       AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
    result value of the routine
        RESULT = COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
    if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
        RETURNCODE = 0.
      ELSE.
    if the returncode is not equal zero, the result will not be updated
        RETURNCODE = 4.
      ENDIF.
    if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
      ABORT = 0..
    -> material consumption quantity:
    The code is the same, but COMM_STRUCTURE-cpquabu replaces COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
    -> The characteristic value calculation is the same for the other key figures.
    5. Update these key figures from the 2LIS_03_UM in the same way.
    =======================================================

  • Non Matched PO receipts

    Hello All,
    I need to develop a query for "Non Matched PO receipts" with the fo;;woing columns
    Supplier Code
    Spplier Name
    quantity received (NOT MATCHED)
    unit price
    currency
    exchange rate
    receiving date
    payment term (assigned to PO)
    so i have wrtiten the following query but it is not returing data is my query correct
    select pv.vendor_type_lookup_code Supplier_code,
    pv.vendor_name Supplier_name,
    rsl.quantity_received,
    aida.unit_price,
    aida.Exchange_rate,
    aia.invoice_currency_code,
    att.name Payment_term
    from AP_Invoices_All aia,
    aP_invoice_distributions_all aida,
    PO_vendors pv,
    AP_TERMS_TL att,
    rcv_transactions rt,
    rcv_shipment_lines rsl
    where aia.vendor_id=pv.vendor_id
    and aia.invoice_id=aida.invoice_id
    and aida.po_distribution_id is null
    and aia.terms_id=att.term_id
    and aida.rcv_transaction_id = rt.transaction_id
    and rt.shipment_line_id = rsl.shipment_line_id
    Thanks,
    Kumar

    Hi,
    Whenever you need help on this forum, post:
    (1) The version of Oracle (and any other relevant software) you're using
    (2) A little sample data (just enough to show what the problem is) from all the relevant tables
    (3) The results you want from that data
    (4) Your best attempt so far
    Executable SQL statements (like "CREATE TABLE AS ..." or "INSERT ..." statements) are best for (2).
    If you can present your problem using commonly available tables (for example, tables in scott schema, or views in the data dictionary), then you can omit (2).
    Formatted tabular output is okay for (3). Type &#123;code&#125; before and after the tabular text, to preserve spacing.
    You've already done (4), but it would be better if you could use &#123;code&#125; tags around that, too: it's hard to read without any formatting.

  • How to close PO after fully matched with invoice only

    Hi,
    We wan't to use 3-way match, but when an invoice is fully matched with the po we want
    the status of the po gets closed. Now it's still open untill you do a receipt for the po.
    We need the QTY REC matchinghold to send the invoices for approval if the
    receipts is not available before the invoice is matched with the po.
    How can I set this up?

    you are correct. That functionality is not available in iprocurement
    Refer note:
    The Initial Quantity Received Satisfies the Receipt Closing Tolerance (Doc ID 168495.1)
    An Enhancement request is already logged:
    16438982 - ABILITY TO RECEIVE ITEMS IN IPROCUREMENT AFTER PO IS CLOSED

  • PO : Invoice value in ME23N is not matching with 2LIS_02_SCL field BWGEO

    Hi Expert,
                  1) Invoice value in ME23N tcode is not matching with datasource 2LIS_02_SCL field BWGEO in item level
    for few item BWGEO field contain the data with tax but for few item the value is not coming correctly.
    2) The value is not matching for that particular item which has same material document in other Item level.
    eg. PO(eg 60000XXXXX) if item 1 has invoice value with tax is 1300+52 and its material doc is XXXX1234. if same material doc XXXX1234 is present in
    item 2 for another invoice of same material invoice value with tax is 1200+48. In that case the value which is coming in
    BWGEO field is 1300 only.
    I am working in 7.0 system for AFS specific. My whole transaction is in INR.
    Thanks and Regards
    Lalit Kumar

    Please review the information below from one of our deverlopers       
    - it may explain the behaviour you are seeing on your system: 
    When posting a GOODS RECEIPT for a DELTA UPLOAD process you only will    
    have the information regarding the GOODS RECEIPT values (XMCEKET-WEMNG   
    and XMCEKET-WEWRT) and not the invoice values (XMCEKET-REMNG and         
    XMCEKET-REWRT).                                                                               
    When posting an INVOICE for a DELTA UPLOAD process you only will         
    have the information regarding the INVOICE values (XMCEKET-REMNG         
    and XMCEKET-REWRT) and not the GOODS RECEIPT values (XMCEKET-WEMNG and   
    XMCEKET-WEWRT).                                                                               
    The DELTA INIT process is different, because for this process, all       
    information about posted documents against a purchasing order need to    
    processed again and this means that all documents related to an order    
    (invoices, goods receipt, deliver costs, goods issue, etc)               
    are read from database and rebuild one by one in the same process, and   
    of course this information in available.                                                                               
    When posting an invoice, the goods receipt information is not            
    available because of the following reasons:                                                                               
    1 - System standard fields.                                              
    In datasource 2LIS_02_SCL, there is only                                 
    fields BWMNG - that represents quantity, BWGEO and BWGEO that            
    represent values. The information under these fields are dependent       
    from the information of field BWVORG (BW transaction key). This field    
    determines whether these values are from a purchasing order, goods       
    receipt or an invoice. You never have a missing information, but when    
    you want to get goods receipt values, you need to check where the        
    BWVORG correspond to goods receipt process and not invoice.                                                                               
    2 - Performance                                                          
    There are documents as purchasing orders and schedule agreements that    
    are opened for years in some customer system (it may not be your case),  
    where goods receipt and invoices have been posted during all this time.  
    Every time that a new document is posted in order to built the           
    cancellation sentence (ROCANCEL = X) and in order to add the new         
    value in the old, system need to process all previous posted documents,  
    and this means processing time. For this reason when posting invoices    
    only previous documents that are invoices are taken into account and     
    not goods receipt.                                                       
    The delta fields, DBWMNG and DBWGEO, are the difference between the 
    purchasing order quantity and values and the goods receipt quantity 
    and values, then is natural that this information is only available 
    when processing a goods receipt and not when processing an invoice. 
    I'm sorry if this is not the system behavior that you are expecting,
    but this is the normal standard behavior and this is really necessary
    because of the system performance when dealing with documents that  
    have a long order history.                                          
    Hope this information is useful for you
    Best Regards
    Barry

  • Matched PO receipts query

    Dear All,
    I have to develop a report for "Matched PO receipts" with the following columns:
    Receipt Date
    Receipt Number
    PO Number
    Supplier Code
    Supplier Name
    Amount
    Please look at this query, Could this solved my problem?
    select to_char(rt.transaction_date,'yyyy-mm-dd')rct_date
    ,rsh.receipt_num rct_number
    ,pha.segment1 po_number
    ,rsh.vendor_id
    ,pv.vendor_name
    ,pvsa.vendor_site_code vendor_site
    ,sum(rt.amount_billed)amount
    from rcv_transactions rt
    ,rcv_shipment_lines rsl
    ,rcv_shipment_headers rsh
    ,po_headers_all pha
    ,po_vendors pv
    ,po_vendor_sites_all pvsa
    ,po_distributions_all pda
    ,ap_invoice_distributions_all aida
    where rt.shipment_line_id = rsl.shipment_line_id
    and rsl.shipment_header_id = rsh.shipment_header_id
    and rt.po_header_id = pha.po_header_id
    and rsh.vendor_id = pvsa.vendor_id
    and rsh.vendor_site_id = pvsa.vendor_site_id
    and pvsa.vendor_id = pv.vendor_id
    and rt.po_header_id = pda.po_header_id
    and pda.po_distribution_id = aida.po_distribution_id
    and rt.transaction_id = aida.rcv_transaction_id
    and to_char(rt.transaction_date ,'yyyy/mm/dd')||' 00:00:00' between :p_date_from and :p_date_to
    and rt.organization_id = :p_unit
    group by to_char(rt.transaction_date,'yyyy-mm-dd')
    ,pha.segment1
    ,rsh.receipt_num
    ,rsh.vendor_id
    ,pv.vendor_name
    ,pvsa.vendor_site_code
    order by 1,to_number(rsh.receipt_num)

    Hi,
    Instead of taking the amount billed from rcv_transactions, you can take this value from ap_invoice_distributions_all. The query looks good, but what about the performance of this query?
    Regards,
    Jyoti

  • Error : Profit Center does not match with Business Area. Message no. ZGLTFI

    Hi Everyone,
    Error occurs when doing inbound PGR. Processed done so far are the following:
    Normal PO created & released.
    Inbound created
    Transfer order created and confirmed.
    When doing PGR via VL32N > click Post Goods Receipt error occurs
    Profit Center does not match with Business Area
    Message no. ZGLTFI0001031
    Checked already in KE53 the Profit Center used was assigned to the Co. Code used in the PO.
    The same Profit Center was maintained in material master.
    The Plant used was assigned to proper division and business area.
    Any other ways to check?
    Btw not only in Inbound PGR the error occurs .. also happened in MIGO and MB1C.
    Tried to do other transaction involing the material, plant and profit center all give the same error.
    Any info shared is much appreciated.
    Thank you.

    this error is not a SAP standard error, it is an own message class (ZGLTFI0001), so it must be issued from a validation or user exit.  Please find the user exit, or talk to FI Team and ask what they check

  • Imei no. does not match with the serivce providers records as we had a replacement through insurance co.  service provider will not unblock the phone

    IMEI no on this phone does not match with service providers records as a replacement was issued from Apple in an insurance claim.  The service provider Vodafone will not unlock this phone without proof of purchase which we have but the receipt does not record the EMEI no.

    Contact Apple http://support.apple.com/kb/HE57

  • 3-way match with paper

    Hi,
    Would like to ask if there's any documentation that suggests 3-way match (PO-GR-IR) in a computer system with the addition of paper as a best practice for checks and balances?
    Hope to hear from you soon.

    Hmm, an interesting situation. What are the quantities on your purchase orders? Are they almost always a quantity of 1? Payables should only close a purchase order when quantity billed and quantity received is GT or equal to the quantity ordered. So if you order a quantity of 10, you could match for quantity 5 on the first invoice, quantity 3 for the second invoice, and quantity 2 for the final invoice. But since you don't receive the quantity until the 3rd invoice, you cannot match on receipts, so that would be a problem.
    Maybe you need to approach this from a different angle? Maybe you should look at the prepayments ability in Payables. Typically Prepayments will be charged to a Prepayment Account (asset). Say you have a purchase order for $10,000. You prepay $5,000 up front, so basically Debit Prepayment 5,000 and Credit Cash 5,000. Same for the next prepayment level - $3,000. Then you get the ordered material received. So you want to do an invoice for $10,000. Match the invoice to the purchase order. Apply the prepayments to the purchase order. Thus you get an entry something like Debit Inventory $10,000, Credit Prepayments $8,000, and Credit Cash $2,000.
    From an accounting perspecitive, you don't show the prepayments in inventory until received, but do show a prepayment asset. Which is reflecting what you really are doing I think.
    I have never worked for anyone who has had to do prepayments, but this is an area that you may wish to investigate as a possible solution for your situation. Good luck.
    John Dickey

  • Query of 3 Way match ( Invoice-Receipt)

    Hi All,
    Can Someone please give me Matching Invoice Query (AP) / Steps for 3-way matching. I have requirement wherein I have to match Invoice with Receipt but I don't know how should i do that through coding or required steps.
    As I know I know below conditions are required for 3 way match but dont know how should I get all these individual data from AP tables.
    Invoice price <= Purchase order price
    Quantity billed <= Quantity Ordered
    Quantity billed <= Quantity received
    Can you please help me to get this information.
    Thanks.

    I have prepared queries based on d 3-way match functionality .. Can some one please verify this, if I am missing anything here -
    -- Invoice price <= Purchase order price
    SELECT sum((NVL(poll.quantity, 0) - NVL(poll.quantity_cancelled, 0)) *
    NVL(pol.unit_price, 0)) "PO PRICE",
    sum(apd.quantity_invoiced * apd.unit_price) "INVOICE PRICE"
    FROM po_headers_all poh,
    po_lines_all pol,
    po_line_locations_all poll,
    po_distributions_all pd,
    ap_invoice_distributions_all apd
    WHERE poh.po_header_id = pol.po_header_id AND
    pol.po_line_id = poll.po_line_id AND
    poll.po_header_id = pol.po_header_id AND
    poh.authorization_status = 'APPROVED' AND
    poh.type_lookup_code = 'STANDARD' AND
    NVL(poh.cancel_flag, 'N') = 'N' AND POL.ITEM_ID IS NOT NULL AND
    apd.unit_price < pol.unit_price AND
    -- AND NVL (poll.quantity, 0) > (NVL (poll.Quantity_received,0) + NVL (poll.Quantity_cancelled,0))
    poll.inspection_required_flag = 'N' AND
    poll.receipt_required_flag = 'Y' and
    pd.po_header_id = poh.po_header_id(+) AND
    poll.po_header_id = pd.po_header_id AND
    pd.po_line_id = pol.po_line_id AND
    pd.line_location_id = poll.line_location_id AND
    apd.po_distribution_id = pd.po_distribution_id AND
    POH.po_header_id = ? AND apd.po_distribution_id is not null
    -- Quantity billed <= Quantity Ordered
    SELECT sum(pd.quantity_ordered) "Quantity Ordered",
    sum(pd.quantity_billed) "Quantity Billed"
    --sum(apd.quantity_invoiced) "Quantity billed"
    FROM po_headers_all poh,
    po_lines_all pol,
    po_line_locations_all poll,
    po_distributions_all pd,
    ap_invoice_distributions_all apd
    WHERE poh.po_header_id = pol.po_header_id AND
    pol.po_line_id = poll.po_line_id AND
    poll.po_header_id = pol.po_header_id AND
    poh.authorization_status = 'APPROVED' AND
    poh.type_lookup_code = 'STANDARD' AND
    NVL(poh.cancel_flag, 'N') = 'N' AND POL.ITEM_ID IS NOT NULL AND
    apd.unit_price < pol.unit_price
    -- AND NVL (poll.quantity, 0) > (NVL (poll.Quantity_received,0) + NVL (poll.Quantity_cancelled,0))
    and POH.po_header_id = ? and poll.inspection_required_flag = 'N' AND
    poll.receipt_required_flag = 'Y' and
    pd.po_header_id = poh.po_header_id(+) AND
    poll.po_header_id = pd.po_header_id AND
    pd.po_line_id = pol.po_line_id AND
    pd.line_location_id = poll.line_location_id and
    apd.po_distribution_id = pd.po_distribution_id and
    apd.po_distribution_id is not null
    --Quantity billed <= Quantity received
    SELECT sum(rsl.QUANTITY_RECEIVED) "Quantity received"
    from rcv_transactions rct,
    rcv_shipment_headers rsh,
    rcv_shipment_lines rsl,
    po_lines pol,
    po_line_locations pll
    where rct.po_line_location_id = pll.line_location_id and
    rct.po_line_id = pol.po_line_id and
    nvl(pol.order_type_lookup_code, 'QUANTITY') NOT IN
    ('RATE', 'FIXED PRICE') and
    rct.shipment_line_id = rsl.shipment_line_id and
    rsl.shipment_header_id = rsh.shipment_header_id and
    transaction_type = 'RECEIVE' and pol.po_header_id = ?
    order by rct.transaction_id

  • CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

    Dear Members,
    The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
    System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
    In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
    I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
    Any help/clues?
    Regards
    Satya

    Hi,
    In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
    The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
    The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
    can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
    regards
    Waman

  • 0FC_OP_01 extractor issues- DFFKKOPBW data not matching with

    Hi All
    We have an issue with the extractor 0FC_OP_01. Our business is comparing the values in
    R/3 report u2013 G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)   with the
    Open Items by GL Account report in BW .(actually these values in the BW report are coming from DFKKOPBW table in R/3) .
    But since august, the R/3 G/L account balance report is not matching with the DFKKOPBW table balances. So bottom line the extractor 0FC_OP_01 is doing something wrong when populating the DFKKOPBW table  which is causing these two reports to be out of balance
    Did anybody face this kind of issue before? Please Advise.
    FYI : We are following the same procedure to populate the DFKKOPBW table as in the below article.
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a9996115-0b01-0010-b2b2-d9de0170a425;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID0001499250DB01896329908162586522End
    Thanks
    KPK

    In my case the Cube/PSA data itself is not matching with the R/3 report data. 
    Basically we run a job in R/3 in t-code FPBW with a Date id and Indentification. This job will pull the entries from base table DFKKOP into DFKKOPBW table .Then FRom this DFKKOPBW table data is loaded into PSA/Cube.
    Here in my case the data in table DFKKOPBW itself is not matching with the R/3 report -  G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)) .
    I am following the same procedure to run the JOb in T-code FPBW to populate the DFKKOPBW table as listed in the document at the above link.  Moreover this difference in balances is occuring only starting from August ..Till July the balances in DFKKOPBW tally with the R/3report.
    Please advise ..
    Thanks
    KPK

Maybe you are looking for