PO release on User ID  Basis

Can I set the Po release Strategy on User Id Basis??
Which field should be taken into consideration in CEKKO Table.

I am sorry Rahul , without checking i quoted wrong field..
nyways have u checked USRN1
regards
Yogesh

Similar Messages

  • My JNI codes get NoSuchMethodException when release to user

    My JNI codes run well in my development environment(JBuilder7), but when they release to user, they get java.lang.NoSuchMethodException. The error generates when the C++ code try to call the java side method.
    The release package was built by my colleague. And I found that they obfuscate my codes after the normal build work.
    So I wonder is this the reason I got NoSuchMethodException ?
    Thanks in advance!

    Yes. I have figured out that it is the obfuscator causes the problem.
    I have spent too much time and energy in sloving the problem, so I think it might be worthwhile to write down what I have learned and let others avoid the same pitfall.
    A common trick played by obfuscate is to change the method and variable, so that a line of code that once said:
    draw(imageList.get(i));
    may change to
    a(b.a(c));
    When my c++ code try to call the java-side code using GetMethodID(..."draw"...) or GetStaticMethodID(..."draw"...), it will, of course, cause the NoSuchMethodException
    After I skipping obfuscating the Java classes called by the c++ codes, the problem solves.
    Thank you very much

  • ESYU: Planner Workbench Release process가 다른 user로부터 planned orders를 release

    Purpose
    Materials Requirement Planning - Version: 11.5.9 to 12.1
    Information in this document applies to any platform.
    11.5.9 ~ R12 version:
    두 명의 users가 MRP Planner Workbench에서 Release를 위해 records updating을 진행하는 경우, 두 명 중 한명만이 update 후 실제로 release를
    submit 했으나 두 명 user의 모든 records가 release 되어 버린다.
    User1은 자신의 Planned Orders 만을 release 할 수 있고, User2 또한 자신의 저장된 Planned Orders 만을 release 해야 한다.
    STEPS:
    1. User 1이 MRP Planned Workbench로 log
    2. User 1은 특정 planner code를 위한 current planned order recommendations 을 찾는다.
    3. User 2가 MRP Planned Workbench로 log
    4. User 2가 특정 planner code를 위한 current planned order recommendations 을 찾는다.
    5. User1은 All for Release를 선택
    6. User2도 All for Release를 선택
    7. User1은 checking process를 끝낸 후 저장
    8. User2는 아직 checking process를 끝내지 못해 save를 아지 않은 상태로 남아 있다.
    9. User1이 [Release] button을 선택
    10. User1이 [Release] button을 선택시 User1과 User2에 의해 저장되거나 check 된 모든 planned order recommendations이 Work in Process와
    Puchasing modules로 released 되어 버림
    Cause
    이 issue의 원인은 현재 MRP planning의 경우 expected functionality 이다.
    MRP Workbench Release process는 모든 planner에 의해 check 되거나 저장된 모든 planned orders를 항상 release 한다.
    Bug 891669 : Enhancement Request
    PLANNER'S WORKBENCH SHOULD RELEASE ORDERS BASED ON PLANNER NAME NOT BY BATCH
    It is explained that this is current functionality in the following rejected Enhancement Request:
    Bug 891669 : PLANNER'S WORKBENCH SHOULD RELEASE ORDERS BASED ON PLANNER NAME NOT BY BATCH
    Solution
    Solution을 적용하기 위해 아래 steps을 실행:
    1. 모든 planner에 의해 check 되거나 저장된 모든 planned orders가 [Release] button에 의해 항상 release 되는것은 현재 MRP Workbench
    Release process에서는 correct functionality 이다.
    2. ASCP Planning의 경우엔 Planner/User에 의해 Release process가 아래 option에 의해 처리 가능하다.
    -- profile MSC:Released Only By User
    -- Standard MRP에서는 이 option은 사용할 수 없고 고려되지 않는다.
    Reference
    Note 311053.1

  • UserIdentityStores Creation fails in case large number at User Search Base

    ou=users1,o=test contains 300 000 users.
    ou=users2,o=test contains 10 users.
    ou=users3,o=test contains 10 users.
    If i create UserIdentityStores with ou=users1, OAM shows fails "
    Failed to connect to User Identity Store.
    URL or Credentials specified are invalid.
    No entries were found under the User Search Base : username with attribute : ou=users1,o=test.
    If i create UserIdentityStores with ou=users2, OAM shows successfully"
    If i create UserIdentityStores with ou=users3, OAM shows successfully"
    Configuration:
    * User Name Attribute : username
    * User Search Base : ou=users1,o=test
    User Filter Object Classes : sso
    * Group Search Base : cn=sso-group,o=test
    This is ODSEE:
    o=test
    -- ou=users2
    ---- username=123
    ---- username=456
    -- ou=users3
    ---- username=abc
    ---- username=123
    -- ou=users4
    -- cn=sso-group
    -- ou=users1
    Is it a bug with OAM when users1 had too much DN inside. I stuck 2 weeks at this step. Any advices is apprecited.
    Thank you!

    Thanks.
    Yes, I know of that 100 column limitation.  But notice that I had 79 columns. Also, it doesn't mention the fact that you can display a certain amount a column, but you are then not able to use the search bar fully.
    "One interactive report per page.
    100 columns can be seen using report columns. You can edit additional columns using Tree view or paginating through Report Column Attributes.
    1,000,000 rows per column heading filter (if no custom LOV is specified in the column attributes).
    You can edit additional columns using Tree view or paginating through Report Column Attributes."
    So the issue that I have is a non documented issue, unless I'm missing something.

  • How to obtain list of user ids base on licensedata assigned?

    Hello all,
    I would like to generate user list base on the licensedata assigned to the user ids (we want to know how many users for each of the license data we assigned to the users), how do i do that? Can please provide me a clear steps to perform the action mentioned? Your help/replies are very much appreciated!
    Thank you.
    regards,
    wei how

    Hi,
    If you have maintained the contractual user type in SU01 for all users then you can go to usmm> user measurement there you will be able to see the user with the license type assigned.
    If contractual user is not maintained in SU01 it will show as TEST user in default in usmm user measurement.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Balaji.S

  • How to Release the user

    Dear All
    Kindly help me out to release/unlock  the user .
    Message is user is locked.
    Thanks and Regards
    Alok Nigam

    Dear Alok,
    Goto tcode SU01-->give user name and click unlock or Ctrl+F5.
    If you want to unlock mass user at a time goto tcode SU10-->give all the users name and click unlock or Ctrl+F5.
    PS: Provided you have the authorization of Tcodes SU01 or/and or SU10.Ask your Basis guys.
    Regards,
    Ashutosh
    Edited by: ashutosh singh on Aug 20, 2008 6:16 AM

  • Need a report on credit release with user name whos has released

    Hi All,
    Need a report with following details:
    1.2. Sales order punched by-user name who has created.
    2. User name who has released sales order from credit block.
    3. release Date and time of order released.
    Please suggest. As I could not find any standard report.
    what tables should I join to get the report.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards,
    Mskgnt

    hI
    >
    > Need a report with following details:
    >
    > 1.2. Sales order punched by-user name who has created.
    You can get the user name from table VBAK-ERNAM Pass the sales order number in to VBAK-VBELN
    > 2. User name who has released sales order from credit block.
    > 3. release Date and time of order released.
    From the report RSSCD100 enter the object class as VERKBELEG and T code as VKM3 and execute
    Or You can use the table CDHDR
    User Name CDHDR-username and for release date and time
    CDHDR-UDATE
    CDHDR-UTIME
    REGARDS
    PrashanthI
    Edited by: Prashanth@SD on Nov 9, 2010 8:03 AM

  • PO Release strategy User Exit  if value is Reduced

    Hi,
    I need to write a user exit to trigger the release strategy in Purchase order even if the value is "Reduced".
    As you may be knowing releases will only be triggered if the value is increased according to standard SAP functionality.
    So to trigger the release stratgey even if the value of PO is reduced some one suggested me user exit "M06E0004" Program :ZXM06U22.I guess we need to define a new characteristic called "URSC1".But cannot make out how really i can achieve this.
    Can any one please guide,if you have worked on it earlier.
    Thanks.

    Gentlemen,
    Any Ideas....!!!

  • Items released automatically first come basis

    We are using FIFO method in SAP 2005B.  I need  to release the open items automatically first come first basis and don't allow to select the newly  arrived items when the old one exists.  Those who have an answer give me a solution immediately.

    Thanks for replying.  I know that.  But I need to release the items in the received orderwise only. Is it possible?
    For Ex.  I received X items  is 10 qty on 29.06.09 @ 15.00
                 I received X items is  5 qty on 30.06.09   @ 20.00
                 I am issuing 2 items from 5 qty which is received on 30.06.09 instead of 10 qty which is received on 29.06.09.
                 How It is correct to select an item?  Can u explain that?

  • Release strategy: User should release only with his highest release code

    Hello,
    Because of personel absences we want to configure the release strategy so that:
    User A or user B releases in the normal case the first level of a PO (with release code 01).
    User C (Manager) releases after release code 01 with release code 02.
    User A is deputy of user C. In this case user B will release with code 01 and user A will release with code 02.
    Because user A can use depending of the case release code 01 or 02 (C deputy) it must be avoided that user B sets release code 01 and 02 for the same purchase order.
    Do you know about a solution for this issue
    Br
    Manuel

    Dear W1N,
    But the systems knows that A released with code 01 and when A tries to release  with code 02 the system knows that the same person of release code 01 is trying with release code 02.
    <b>The aim is to avoid the second release from the same person and not to automate the release strategy.</b>
    In such a case A has to cancel the release for code 01 (ME28) and wait until B is reachable to do the release of code 01.
    When C is absent A knows that his task is to release code 02.
    Is this check really not possible?
    Best regards
    Manuel

  • PR Release with user decision

    Hi Experts,
                       I have done PR Release WorkFlow and it is working fine and i am also using RSWUWFML2 program to send the workitem to external mail so that on clicking the shortcut it takes to the release screen. But they further need an enhancement of only button (like user decision ).
    How can i replace PR release screen with user decision step type . In user decision i am not able to pass release code in standard activity.
    1) Release
    2) cancel
    3) Reset
    Regards,
    Hari

    If I'm right, you are trying to replace the approval activity with a std decision step. If yes, then there is no need to pass on the release code to this decision step, the rel code is passed on to the WF as std, now once the user clicks on approve, the approve branch will become effective now add a bck grd activity to release the PR using std FM's. similarly apply for the other branches.
    Regards, IA

  • PO release strategy user exit

    Hi Experts,
    This is regarding the PO Release strategy.
    I have implemented user exit u2018EXIT_SAPLEBND_002u2019 for filling User defined field i_cekko-usrc1 based on PO line item net values for PO release strategy.
    Our function consultant defined characteristic on this field and created at the release strategy.
    My code in the user exit:
    i_cekko-usrc1 = 'X'.
    e_cekko = i_cekko.
    It is triggering the user exit and setting the  USRC1 to u2018Xu2019. But it is not triggering the release strategy.
    Do I need fill any additional fields?
    Thank you for your help in advance.
    Regards,
    Soujanya

    Gentlemen,
    Any Ideas....!!!

  • SAP Standard Workflow for PR Release (with user exit)

    Hi SAP WF Gurus,
    Good day!
    I just wanted to check with you if you have ever used a user exit in the activation of the standard workflow for PR (overall ( release. What we have is a two0step approval process wherein each level has a proxy/alternate approver. We used the available user exit to accommodate this customer requirement since the standard release would only allow us to define 1 approver as a prerequisite for the next level. We were able to execute this on the first level approval; however, we observed that the workflow is not anymore triggered (i.e. does not send work items to agents) for the level 2 release. My questions therefore are:
    1. How to set up SWEC? I already executed SWELS and SWEL to check if the events are being created and event linkage is automatically deactivated after running into an error regarding the binding...My initial SWEC setup is for BANF BUS2105 RELEASED On Change. I am assuming that since the workflow was released from the first level, this should be the starting point
    2. How to rectify the binding error? I already executed automatic binding in the WF header for the start events but still face it
    Your inputs/comments are most welcome
    Regards,
    DeLo

    Just to add:
    The error that I am encountering in the second run/cycle for the PR approval workflow is Import container contains errors (are any obligatory elements missing?)
    Basically, WS20000077 will be executed if an approval level is seen. Once the approval is made, then the workflow is also completed. However, for multiple approvers, I only get to execute successfully the first level approval. The succeeding levels are encountering errors as stated above

  • User authorization base on calculated field

    I may ask for an imposible, here my case
    we have a customer repository, where depending of the convination of values of few fields, diferent organizations are responsible of each customer (4 diferent organizations, I would call them by colours)
    in that way I thought to make four calculated fields, as isrelevant_for_organization_blue, etc... where I codify the logic behind
    (note, a customer can be relevant for more than one organization, therefore the four fields)
    and of course, the users want to only only their relevant customers, and not able to see the non-relevant
    so, the first idea, "let's maintain the authorization on the calculated field !!"
    which it come to do not work, becouse no authorization can be made on calculated fields
    second idea, "let's calculate it on import time", which even is worst idea (in case logic change, there is a need of correct the data) and it does not work neither. No calculation fields on import time ...
    any other idea arround ??
    thanks you
    (running MDM 5.5.SP6)

    what you mean  by "by using assignments" ??
    doing it manually ??
    we are loading from diferent sources via XI into MDM (XML file into the MDM folder ...)  and we would not like to codify this logic into XI. Te logic is subject to change from time to time (often I fear)
    correction to historical data when logic is changing, can be done using a calculate field and manual correcting the necesary records. But on daily/weekly bases (when we load info) it should be done someway automatically
    any ideas ??
    thansk in advance

  • Release Stratergy User in Purchase Req.

    Hi Friends,
    We are using user exit to determine the Purchase Req. Approvers. In ME52N/ME53N under the Release Strategy Tab there is a table which shows the Approver name and description against each Release code. In our case we have multiple approvers against each release code, but the system show only one against release code, Is there any way to show all the approvers there(i.e.multiple rows against each release code).
    To be precise  all I want is that  my Purchase Req. Release Strategy tab should show all the approvers along with release codes .Please advise.
    Regards
    Sapient

    Hi ,
    I think what you are looking for has little to do with the worlflow. All you want is that your Purchase Req. Release tab should show all the approvers along with release codes .
    The idea is good but is not possible using user exit or workflow . You can go in for implicit enhancement for displaying all the possible approvers in the ME54N transcation.
    How workflow can help here is by passing the relevant Work item to all the approvers.
    Regards
    Gautam
    Edited by: gautam maini on Mar 21, 2011 10:26 AM

Maybe you are looking for

  • SQL connection error ( probably ) due to Internal battery changed?

    Hi We have an application written in C# 2005 that use an Sql Server 2005 database with Windows authentication mode Our customer with Windows XP sp3 used our software for a long time without any problem but he needs to change the PC internal battery a

  • Installing Oracle Text add-in to Jdeveloper 10g...

    Hi , In the following url: http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/text/text.html the Jdeveloper's add-in for developing Text application is downloadable.... My question is: The zip file titled: "TextWizard10.1.0.3.0.1_jar.zip" for JDevelo

  • How to change iClouds account.

    HOw to change iClouds account?

  • Can't repair Imac hard drive

    tried repairing my hard drive using the disk doctor utility.  It said I needed to insert the OS disk and restart and run the Disk repair utility.  I inserted the disc but cant seem to get to the repair utility.  What am i missing?

  • Adobe Reader XI all dialog box's corrupt

    It looks like any dialog box in XI is corrupt.  This machine is windows 7 pro 32 bit OS. I have uninstalled, reinstalled, uninstalled, used Adobe cleaner on it and reinstalled rebooting each time.  I have installed Segoe font as one user had said res