Polish payroll issue: FP/FGSP

Hi Anyone,
I'm in the process of applying three OSS notes for Poland payroll.
The OSS note of my concern is #1323028.  This note required three
prerequisites; 1297363, 1316576, and 1317569. I have susscessfully
applied note 1316576.  Note 1317569 rejected because it was expecting
the prerequisite note 1297363.
In January of this year, I applied OSS note 1298110. Note 1298110
specifically states "In case you have not yet applied the note 1297363,
it is enough to import the above mentioned transport because it
contains the full and corrected ABAP coding of the legal change
described in note 1297363."  Note 1297363 also issues a caution and
refers to note 1298110.
Now, as a result of only applying 1298110, the subsequent notes 1316576
and 1323028 are not accepted due to the prerequisite discrepancy.

Hi,
The way you described the issue, seems that you have correctly applied OSS notes. Though, the OSS note 1298110 mention about full and corrected ABAP code which you applied and still facing an issue.
1. Can you check, if the latest version for the same oss note 1298110 is released by SAP (SAP does that very often, if they have missed somthing in previous version of same oss note.)
2. If point number 1 is satisfied, then it is advised that to write to SAP and explain the issue. It can be issue form SAP side.
Thank you,
Abhay

Similar Messages

  • Payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563

    Hi Payroll Experts,
    I have a payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563 (October PY Run)
    When i m runnning the Current month Payroll(October PY Run), Total Earning - total deductions are not matching with Net Pay. later i came to know that the system creates the WT /561 and deducts from the Net Pay.
    But as per the Employee Payment Details , there is no recovery required from the employee for the past one year. But even then the system creates the WT /561. and deducts the same from NET Pay.
    The followng are the WT details
    IN - Period
    OCT 2011
         /101 Total gross amount     118,897.00
         /110 Net payments/deductions     76,070.00-
         /550 Statutory net pay     95343
         /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     37,692.00-
         /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment      37,692.00-
         /559 Bank transfer                                                   34,317.00
         /560 Net pay     37,218.00
         /563 Claim from previous month     5,609.00
    FOR Period
    Sept- Oct
         /101 Total gross amount     49,213.00
         /110 Net payments/deductions      31,721.00-
         /550 Statutory net pay     41,529.00
         /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     14,591.00
         /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment     23,101.00-
         /553 Recalc.diff.to last payr.     37,692.00
         /559 Bank transfer                                                   14,591.00
         /560 Net pay     14,591.00
         /561 Claim     5,609.00
    I request  some body to  throw siome light on the same.

    Hi Experts,
    Thanks for everyone for replying to my query ,
    I have a doubt that If you check the WTs /551 and /552  in the IN PRD, the negative sign is coming for both the WTs
    Is it correct?
    And also, Assume that there may be a master data changes like Bank details and other deduction Wts happened in the month of Aug and now i m going to run the payroll for the month of Nov,
    some of the employees having differences in the Net Pay, Eventhough the employee is having sufficient balances.
    So how do i handle this issue
    IS ther any way to solve this differences?
    Please Let me know how to solve this issue.
    Thanks

  • Acrobat SDK 9.1 - custom plugin - Polish Characters issue

    Hi,
    I hope any of you will be able to help me out as we are having small issue.  We are developing a plug-in that will digitally sign only XML prior to posting via webservice. This plug-in is developed for Adobe Reader 9.1 and we are using Adobe Acrobat SDK 9.1 to develop it.  This plug-in needs to support Polish characters, so the plug-in will be compiled with _UNICODE directive.  We are running into a Polish Character issue where Polish Characters are not being displayed in the plug-in popup.  Would you be able to tell us how is the Acrobat SDK dealing with this (as it is using std:string and not any type of wide string format), what type of params will get simple functions (like AVAlertNote).
    We are also using the JS bridge to export data from the fdf form (using exportXFAData).
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!
    Thank you,
    Jan Kropiwnicki

    You should be using ASText objects when working with Unicode.

  • Ireland Payroll - Issue in Tax Refund for Leavers

    Hello Payroll Experts,
    Greetings!
    We are having problems for 2 of our Ireland Based Employees.
    The Below is the step wise details of the issue:
    => Employee has left the Organisation in the month of 21st October'08.
    => The Seperation Action for the employee only has been made only after
    the completion of October Month's Payroll, hence the employee has been
    paid until 31st October '08.
    => While running the November Month Payroll, this employee has been
    picked by the payroll again & the system is calculating the Retro and
    have given the wrongly calculated days back (21st Oct - 31st Oct'08).
    => Even the Pension refund has been given.
    => But the TAX is not getting RECALCULATED (Tax Refund).
    Could you please help us to find out why this issue is happening.
    Thank you in Advance
    Best Regards
    Vijay

    Hi,
    I am facing a problem in professional tax. some employees transferred from non-tax area to tax area, for them the tax is not deducting. where to check?
    Please help me.
    Chandra
    Hi Chandra,
    Please check the following tables:
    V_7IN0P_PTX
    v_t7inp1
    v_t7inp3
    v_t7inp4
    Important : Also check whether when the employee is moving from non ptax region to ptax region then the prorated amount of the ptax region is soming under ptax limit or the amount is under nil limit.
    Along with the above also check, IT0588 subtype 0003 for PTax.
    Regards,
    ARNAV...
    Edited by: ARNAV... on Mar 6, 2010 8:11 AM

  • UK Payroll Issue for terminated emp.

    HI Experts.
    Im facing a problem with payroll process. I did termination action for an employee.  He was paid in September but I made him a leaver from 31.08.08 so that the system will reverse automatically the entry for September.  When running the payroll, its giving the error message below, that an employee is getting a negative taxable pay due to the reversal.
    It is showing following error in log.
    5  PIT   GGDN      NOAB      Interpret NI retro changes                                 
                        5  Processing           U                                                                               
    U  Termination in operation ERROR                                               
                               20090751                                                                               
    GGDN*/121< 0       ERROR     #NEXTR A   *   "NEGATI VE TAXABLE  PAY, INAC T  
                               Basic entry in IT :                                                          
           Processing at End of Selection
    Regards.
    Sam

    Is this issue in the live production system? Person left in August, but you only became aware of it in November?I am not too sure what can be done in this case, Schema GRET works for us only if retro is restricted to one period i.e if you are running November payroll, it should only retro for October.
    If you facing this issue in test system try running October payroll using schema GRET. I will think about this some more in the meantime.

  • UK Payroll Issue :Gross Wage Type /101 missing from RT

    Hi,
    We are facing an issue for some of the employees wherein Gross wage
    type /101 is not being generated when payroll is run .In place of /101 , /A01 wage type
    is getting created.
    This issue is being faced by employees whose claims were entered in
    March ( Payroll Period 12 2008) to be paid in April ( Payroll Period 01
    2009)
    If anybody knows ,please let me know why its happening like that .
    Thanks in advance.
    Anupama

    Hi Surya,
    Folowing is the log for employee not getting claims.
    /101 Total gross                                                       633.52
    /105 Working net                                                       475.08
    /111 EE's Pensio                                                       633.52
    /121 Taxable pay                                                       617.38
    /124 Pre-tax ded                                                        35.94-
    /131 NIable pay                                                        633.52
    /132 Regular NIa                                                       633.52
    /141 Arrestable                                                        493.78
    /211 Salary relv                                                       633.52
    /212 Salary relv                                                       653.32
    /302 Employer NI                                                        25.64
    /501 Tax paid                                                          123.60
    /550 Statutory n                                                       475.08
    /552 Retro. net                                                         18.70
    /559 Bank transf              01                                       493.80
    /560 Amount paid                                                       493.80
    /5A4 Sal.AWE bas                                                        19.80
    /5C2 Retro arstb                                                        18.70
    /5T2 Retro.taxbl                                                        18.70
    /5T4 Retro.preta                                                         1.10-
    /700 WT plus ER                                                        659.16
    /840 Diff.curr.f01                                   1.77
    /851 Total hours                                   103.18
    /P20 Tax-free pe                                                        34.84
    /V03 Net Pay fro                  V 03                                   0.02
    /V41 ME: arrest.                                                         0.02
    /VNS ME: NI paid                             25.64   2.00              653.34
    /VT3 ME:Taxable                                                          0.02
    /VT4 ME:Tax Paid
    9001 Local Gover                                                        34.84
    9101 Local Gover          0002    O 02                                 126.07
    9201 LG Tax Free                                                        34.84
    9N39 Cost dist.o          0002                                          25.64
    9NZ3 Cost dist o          0002    O 02                                  25.64
    9P01 Cost dist.o                                                       126.07
    3 /001 Main Hourly01                       62,173.06
    3 /002 WTD under 501                       71,026.95
    3 /003 WTD over 5y01                       72,617.95
    3 /004 Schools Spe01                       71,250.13
    3 /005 Valuation b01                            6.25
    3 /010 Daily Rate 01                       204361.29
    3 /011 Daily Rate 01                       204361.29
    3 /012 Daily Rate 01                       204361.29
    3 /013 Daily Rate 01                       204361.29
    3 /250 Salary summ                                                       633.52
    3 /251 Basic Annua01                                                   7,602.24
    3 /252 Total Annua01                                                   7,602.24
    3 1000 Basic Pay (01                                                     633.52
    Following is the log for employee getting claims
    /105 Working net                                                     2,761.26
    /111 EE's Pensio                                                     3,166.86
    /121 Taxable pay                                                     2,028.22
    /131 NIable pay                                                      3,166.86
    /133 Irregular N                                                     3,166.86
    /141 Arrestable                                                      1,622.62
    /211 Salary relv                                                     3,166.86
    /212 Salary relv                                                     2,028.22
    /501 Tax paid                                                          405.60
    /550 Statutory n                                                     2,761.26
    /551 Stat.net re                                                     3,166.86-
    /552 Retro. net                                                      2,028.22
    /553 Recalc.diff                                                     3,166.86-
    /5A1 Sal.AWE bas                                     1.00
    /5A3 Sal.AWE bas                                                     3,166.86-
    /5A4 Sal.AWE bas                                                     2,028.22
    /5C1 Arstble ern                                                     3,166.86-
    /5C2 Retro arstb                                                     2,028.22
    /5T1 Txbl.pay re                                                     3,166.86-
    /5T2 Retro.taxbl                                                     2,028.22
    /700 WT plus ER                                                      3,166.86
    /840 Diff.curr.f01                                   2.80
    /851 Total hours                                   162.80
    /A01 Total gross                                                     3,166.86
    /V01 Net Pay on                                                      1,622.62
    3 /001 Main Hourly01                       190940.93
    3 /002 WTD under 501                       218132.27
    3 /001 Main Hourly01                       190940.93
    3 /002 WTD under 501                       218132.27
    3 /003 WTD over 5y01                       223018.42
    3 /004 Schools Spe01                       218817.70
    3 /005 Valuation b01                           19.19
    3 /010 Daily Rate 01                       990267.74
    3 /011 Daily Rate 01                       990267.74
    3 /012 Daily Rate 01                       990267.74
    3 /013 Daily Rate 01                       990267.74
    3 /250 Salary summ                                                     3,069.83
    3 /251 Basic Annua01                                                  36,837.96
    3 /252 Total Annua01                                                  36,837.96
    3 1270 Notional Ba01                                                   3,069.83
    3 3715 Claim WTD >01                       223018.42 142.00            3,166.86
    I have also got this info.
    Retroaction and End of Year 
    Purpose
    If you need to use retroaction over end of year, for example when overtime entered in period 12 is to be paid in period 1, or backdated pay increases applied in the new tax year are to start in the previous tax year, you can do this without this changing any statutory balances in the previous tax year.
    Process Flow
    If you make any changes over end of year that trigger retroaction, this will not affect the statutory balances in the previous tax year.
    However, a change that affects total gross, for example, will be recorded and summed into a wage type called /A01 (Total Gross). The /A01 value will feed a wage type called /Z01 (Total Gross), which will be passed across to the new tax year, ensuring that any retro differences will only affect statutory cumulatives in the new tax year, but will not compromise period 12 statutory cumulatives that may already have been used for end of year reporting.
    The following wage types were introduced to enable retroaction over end of year:
    u2022     /A01
    u2022     /A12
    u2022     /AMP
    u2022     /AP0
    u2022     /AP1
    u2022     /ASP
    u2022     /Z01
    u2022     /Z12
    u2022     /ZMP
    u2022     /ZP0
    u2022     /ZP1
    u2022     /ZSP
    Thanks and Regards,
    Anupama

  • UK Payroll Issue

    Hi
    I am facing issue in SAP HR Payroll for UK employee.
    One employee was hired on 7th July 2014. He was not paid salary in july, his retro was executed in august so he got july's salary in august.
    But again he got salary in september also.
    Please suggest how would i trace that why the employee has been paid twice.
    thanks & Regards
    Shikha Bhatt

    When you say his salary paid twice ? How are you saying that by checking /560 if July payroll log is executed in the month of september it doesnt mean he is being paid twice
    if possible paste the RT results for the month of September

  • UK Payroll Issue : Tax Adjustment Wage Type E501

    Hi,
    We are facing an issue when inputting Tax adjustment wage type E501 to adjust previous year's tax retroactively.
    When we enter wage type E501 with tax adjustment amount in IT0015 for the period 12 2008 ( March) and run payroll for current period ( May 2009) The remuneration Statement shows weird results.
    For example :
    For an employee we entered Wagetype E501 with amount +£20.00 with a date of 31/3/09 in May. The pay has been calculated and the tax due to be deducted in May is £568.60.  The payslip shows £588.60 (£568.60 + -£20.00) and it also shows £588.60 for a retrospective pay period (*) this figure should not appear at all.  Again the payslip does not balance but it would if the correct tax amount of £568.60 only showed on the payslip.
    E501 is purely an adjustment  to the Year to Date cumulatives it is not a deduction (or refund) to the employee and therefore should not affect the payslip.
    UK Payroll gurus please help me sort out this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Anupama

    Hi Surya,
    Thanks for the reply.
    I have checked and found out that subschema ZNTO ( GNTO) contains ZEOY(GEOY) and this is how it looks. Please let me know if any changes are to be made to the PCR .
    ZEOY Adjustment to results table RT
          E101 /101 adjustment
          E112 /112 adjustment
          E121 /121 adjustment
          E501 /501 adjustment
            ADDWTE*    RT   Results table
            ADDWTE/501 RT   Results table
          E505 /505 adjustment
          E506 /506 adjustment
          ECSL /CSL EOY Adjustment
          EP20 /P20 adjustment
          EP21 /P21 adjustment
          ESPY /SPY adjustment
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Anupama

  • Payroll issue with Teachers

    Hi
    Wondering if anyone has come across this issue.
    Currently we use a 3rd party application for processing Payroll (not Oracle Payroll).
    We are currently being advised that for Teacher pension records to be correct, if that person takes flexible retirement or changes job - because of their basis of service - they have to get a completely new employee record - i.e a new employee number. Thus currently in HR we are having to terminate and then re-create the employee, leading to a lot of extra work and also making the data in the system look odd as the same person can have 3 or 4 employee records.
    I guess I'm wondering what other places do with Teachers (if any local authority types are on here who deal with this)?
    Cheers
    Martin

    The function REMWR writes the results of function REMIT to the respective tables in a TemSe file. This is only performed at the end of the evalaution schema processing.
    This function should only be used in evaluation schema X500 (according to the respective country). Since it is not carried out for each personnel number but at the end of the selection procedure.
    Check this and also are you getting some error in that. If yes then let us know, else try to debug the funtion with the help of abaper.
    Edited by: praveen.hcm on May 10, 2011 6:12 PM

  • Payroll Issues in Net payment

    Dear Experts,
    Business Scenario
    The employee is on leave for 2 months (paid leave)in that 2 months loan should not deduct. 3rd month he came back and the laon amount should be deduct .
    So,In Master Data for IT45 maintained record for those 2months in "Condition" amount=0 and for the next month onwards maintained regular installment payment which he has to pay.
    When I am running payroll for the 3rd month am getting Loan Type Error as below
    Error with a loan wage type
    A loan wage type in table RT should be deducted, however the
    however the remaining net amount was too small
    Wage type /LRP
    Please lower the loan repayment in infotype 0045
    Choose an amount that can be deducted
    while running simulation for 4th Month their is no Error in Payroll Log But for the 3rd Month "NET PAYMENT" is showing as Zero in Payslip and not showing in RT table also
    Note: This Net Payment issue for the 3rd Month is not only  to the above scenario Employee it is not showing for ALL EMPLOYEES.
    Kindly help me in resolving this issue as this is Very Very High, your immediate response is highly Appreciable
    Regards,
    Rao.

    Dear....
    Please check that u press the calendar button to regenerate the last payment date and also check that repayment plan in IT0045
    another thing check IT0078, what will be shown there????.
    After that run one by one payroll for the months you have no deduction of loan and check is there any loan deduction or not.
    What you have to do for skipping loan payment is copy the current loan and make the repayment amount zero, i hope u did the same but in the last split u have to recalculate the payment date.

  • Payroll Issue

    Dear Gurus,
    Please provide me with your knowledgeable input....
    1st/ My question here is what is the significance & importance of Allowance Grouping in  payroll-India scenario.....i have gone through the other posts but could get a clear understanding.....
    2nd/ Importance of Generate Payroll period and its relationship with control record.
    Can you all please put forward your views on this, i will be really thankful to you all.

    Hi,
    1) Answer:  You can get below answer by clicking the documentation of " Define Pay Scale Groupings for Allowances"
    you define pay scale groupings for allowances to differentiate between employee groups. These groupings determine which benefits apply to a particular group of employees.
    Example
    Consider a company Thumbtacks Pvt Ltd., with two levels of managers and three levels of regular employees. We will define allowance groupings, such that each level of managers or employees get the benefits entitled to them as per the employers policies.
    To enable this :
    1. Identify the different benefits each person is entitled to
    2. Create groupings for each category, and assign the privileges
    We can now proceed to create employee groupings starting with the top management. Working down the corporate ladder we have:
    o  MN01 for senior managers who receive the benefit of a company provided House, Computer,  Medical Allowance, Car with a driver and an additional 5% Provident Fund (PF) contribution from the employer.
    o  MN02 for junior managers who receive the benefit of a company provided Medical Allowance, Car and an additional 5% PF contribution from the employer.
    o  EE01 for senior employees who receive the benefit of a company provided Car and Cellular
    Phone.
    o  EE02 for junior employees who receive the benefit of a company provided Cellular Phone only.
    o  EE03 for office boys who receive the benefit of a lunch allowance
    In a similar manner, you can create any number of 'Pay Scale Groupings for Allowance' based on the different benefits you wish to provide for your employees.
    Activities
    3. Enter a four digit alphanumeric value for each pay scale grouping for allowances in the AlGrp field.
    4. Enter a description for the grouping in the Allowance grp desc field and save your entries.
    2) Answer: You can get below answer by clicking the documentation of "Generate Payroll Periods"
    you use the report RPUCTP00 (Generate Payroll Periods) to generate the date specifications for a selected period for the payroll periods that are to be valid in your system. For each period parameter that is assigned to a payroll area, the system requires the following date  specifications:
    o  Start date and end date of each payroll period
    o  Payment date of each payroll period
    When you execute the report RPUCTP00, the system creates these dates according to the data that you  enter in the report's selection screen.
    Example
    You generate the payroll periods for the period parameters monthly for the years 1999 to 2004. The start and end dates of the periods should be the same as the start and end dates of the calendar months. The periods' payment dates should be three days before the end of the period.
    Requirements -
    In the step Check Payroll Area, which is in this section of the Implementation Guide (IMG), you have assigned a period parameter to all the payroll areas.
    Standard settings -
    There are no entries in the standard system.
    Recommendation
    Generate the payroll periods for several years in advance.
    Activities -
    1. In the selection screen of the report, enter the required data and run the report.
    2. Check the date specifications that the system has generated for the payroll periods and the payment dates.
    Further notes -
    You must run the report separately for each combination of period parameter and date modifier that is assigned to a payroll period.
    Bhairavareddy

  • HR REPORT about GET PAYROLL ISSUE!

    HI
    i using LDB pnp to report about PY data!
    i get PY data using GET PAYROLL!
    one case occurs as follow:
    search  one person(99005500) using personid number i will get result ok!
    all other condition not change! just in personid(pernr-pernr) condition,  i put mass person id!
    in these person, some id < 9900500, in this time, the person id 99005500 some period py data
    can't display out!
    i have to check period list using call method pay->read_result
                                                           IMPORTING
                                                                 list = mylist. in GET PERNR !
      i find mylist have different!
    in first scene:
        mylist data contain all data about this person: begin with 20060110
    but in last scene:
        mylist data contain data just begin with 20080804
    so i think miss py data cause by mylist change !
    i in SAP demo code:EXAMPLE_PNP_GET_PAYROLL i have saw:
    You can use the methods of class "pay" to read and modify
    the list of payroll result that is going to be processed at
    the <get payroll> event. However, these method calls might
    change with the next release.
      CREATE OBJECT pay.
    pay->LDB = 'SAPDB_MY_OWN_LDB'. "only if you copied the LDB PNP
      CALL METHOD pay->read_result IMPORTING list = mylist.
    "delete mylist index 2. "For example: Remove an unwanted payroll result
      CALL METHOD pay->write_result EXPORTING list = mylist.
    what happend in LDB PNP! how to get mylist i want?
    because using CALL METHOD pay->read_result IMPORTING list = mylist. will cause error!
    help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    thank you advance!

    Hi,
    Refer this link https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/3180. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    Regards,
    Flavya

  • Off Cycle Payroll Issue

    Hi Gurus
      I  Ran off Cycle Payroll and got Result.
      then Ran Regular payroll but the OffCycle Payroll Also running and amount is Added in net in Regular Payroll.

    Dear Skindar
      We have done as you mentioned only
    The Scenario is
    We Are going live by running April to Augest2011 live payroll and for Sep2011 We are going to Post in FI.
    I.E April to Aug2011 no FI posting.
    We Ran  20.04.2011 off Cycle by keeping Control Record in Exit Mode in mArch2011
    Then Ran regular payroll April2011, here it is running for two periods. (Off Cycle and Regular)
    Kindly advise me in this

  • Polish Character issues

    Hi,
    Our application has a JBoss server running on a Unix platorm.
    Apache is the webserver.
    My requirement is that a client user should be able to input details on to a for and on submit it will go to a third party tool and generate a PDF.
    Now the catch here is that our clients want to input polish characters.
    I installed the corresponding central european font for PDF generation and tested it out individually and that is working fine!
    I modifed the jsp to include:
    <meta HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-2">
    I have also modified the apached httpd.conf to add:
    AddDefaultCharset ISO-8859-2
    All this allows me to display the following characters on the page "&#281; &#261; &#380; � &#322; " and to input them but when submiting the generated PDF seems to relace the &#261; with a plus minus sign.
    I cant seem to paste the charaters here properly.... :( but hopefully u got the idea..
    Any clues?

    I guess that you need the html equivalents e.g. &#281; in order to see the Polish characters on the page, but you need to put the original characters back before creating the .pdf.

  • Urgent requirement: Payroll Issue

    Hi Folks!!!!
    Any one help me out ...how to get sum of /701 and /q01 from results table .I need to write PCR.
    when i can see /Q01 in RT table or when the system generates /Q01 in RT ???
    Points will be rewarded
    Thanks
    Mike

    This process is carried out on ordinary and adjustment payroll runs using the VERPVH function. The general process consists of the following steps:
    ●     The system searches for data required to carry out calculation. This data is:
    ○     The Employee Normal Wage (SNE) in accordance with employee payroll cycle (/0NS).
    ○     The Statutory Minimum Wage (VEMIN field in table T511P).
    ○     The T511K table constants corresponding to the RPVH payment.
    ○     Employee Contribution Amount (/701).
    ○     Company contribution amount (/702).
    Example
    Employee Salary:                           750,000.00
    RPVH Maximum Wage:                  562,500.00
    Calculation Base:                           562,500.00
    Employee Deduction Amount:             5,625.00
    Company Contribution Amount:   11,250.00
    REWARD POINTS

Maybe you are looking for

  • Link from one Page Group to another

    It it possible to click on a link in one page group and link to a page in another page group.

  • The iPhone 5 is terrible...want to return!!!

    I bought my iPhone 5 in December and I spent a ridiculous amount of money for it...even buying it at discount! Since then, my data has been exponential and I end up owing over a hundred dollars plus in data overage charges! I was told to turn of the

  • Setting Column Names in Dynamic Pivot Query

    Hi all, I'm having trouble setting column names in a dynamic pivot query and was wondering if someone could please help me figure out what I need to do. To help you help me, I've setup an example scenario in my hosted account. Here's the login info f

  • Sync Error (Intellisy​nc) - Need Help

    Hi, I'm using BB Desktop Software 6 and am trying to sync my BB device's calendar and contacts with my pc outlook 2007. Everytime I start sync or start to setup the sync I get an error message saying "The operation terminated unexpectedlly" in Intell

  • How to attach jpeg photo images to AI artwork

    How can I transform the perspective of a jpeg photo image and view the results in AI?  Also, how can I attach this image over another AI vector artwork?  Do I have to convert this rastor jpeg photo image to a vector image before I can do this?