UK Payroll Issue

Hi
I am facing issue in SAP HR Payroll for UK employee.
One employee was hired on 7th July 2014. He was not paid salary in july, his retro was executed in august so he got july's salary in august.
But again he got salary in september also.
Please suggest how would i trace that why the employee has been paid twice.
thanks & Regards
Shikha Bhatt

When you say his salary paid twice ? How are you saying that by checking /560 if July payroll log is executed in the month of september it doesnt mean he is being paid twice
if possible paste the RT results for the month of September

Similar Messages

Payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563

Hi Payroll Experts,
I have a payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563 (October PY Run)
When i m runnning the Current month Payroll(October PY Run), Total Earning - total deductions are not matching with Net Pay. later i came to know that the system creates the WT /561 and deducts from the Net Pay.
But as per the Employee Payment Details , there is no recovery required from the employee for the past one year. But even then the system creates the WT /561. and deducts the same from NET Pay.
The followng are the WT details
IN - Period
OCT 2011
     /101 Total gross amount     118,897.00
     /110 Net payments/deductions     76,070.00-
     /550 Statutory net pay     95343
     /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     37,692.00-
     /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment      37,692.00-
     /559 Bank transfer                                                   34,317.00
     /560 Net pay     37,218.00
     /563 Claim from previous month     5,609.00
FOR Period
Sept- Oct
     /101 Total gross amount     49,213.00
     /110 Net payments/deductions      31,721.00-
     /550 Statutory net pay     41,529.00
     /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     14,591.00
     /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment     23,101.00-
     /553 Recalc.diff.to last payr.     37,692.00
     /559 Bank transfer                                                   14,591.00
     /560 Net pay     14,591.00
     /561 Claim     5,609.00
I request some body to throw siome light on the same.

Hi Experts,
Thanks for everyone for replying to my query ,
I have a doubt that If you check the WTs /551 and /552 in the IN PRD, the negative sign is coming for both the WTs
Is it correct?
And also, Assume that there may be a master data changes like Bank details and other deduction Wts happened in the month of Aug and now i m going to run the payroll for the month of Nov,
some of the employees having differences in the Net Pay, Eventhough the employee is having sufficient balances.
So how do i handle this issue
IS ther any way to solve this differences?
Please Let me know how to solve this issue.
Thanks

Ireland Payroll - Issue in Tax Refund for Leavers

Hello Payroll Experts,
Greetings!
We are having problems for 2 of our Ireland Based Employees.
The Below is the step wise details of the issue:
=> Employee has left the Organisation in the month of 21st October'08.
=> The Seperation Action for the employee only has been made only after
the completion of October Month's Payroll, hence the employee has been
paid until 31st October '08.
=> While running the November Month Payroll, this employee has been
picked by the payroll again & the system is calculating the Retro and
have given the wrongly calculated days back (21st Oct - 31st Oct'08).
=> Even the Pension refund has been given.
=> But the TAX is not getting RECALCULATED (Tax Refund).
Could you please help us to find out why this issue is happening.
Thank you in Advance
Best Regards
Vijay

Hi,
I am facing a problem in professional tax. some employees transferred from non-tax area to tax area, for them the tax is not deducting. where to check?
Please help me.
Chandra
Hi Chandra,
Please check the following tables:
V_7IN0P_PTX
v_t7inp1
v_t7inp3
v_t7inp4
Important : Also check whether when the employee is moving from non ptax region to ptax region then the prorated amount of the ptax region is soming under ptax limit or the amount is under nil limit.
Along with the above also check, IT0588 subtype 0003 for PTax.
Regards,
ARNAV...
Edited by: ARNAV... on Mar 6, 2010 8:11 AM

UK Payroll Issue for terminated emp.

HI Experts.
Im facing a problem with payroll process. I did termination action for an employee. He was paid in September but I made him a leaver from 31.08.08 so that the system will reverse automatically the entry for September. When running the payroll, its giving the error message below, that an employee is getting a negative taxable pay due to the reversal.
It is showing following error in log.
5 PIT   GGDN      NOAB      Interpret NI retro changes
                    5 Processing           U
U Termination in operation ERROR
                           20090751
GGDN*/121< 0       ERROR     #NEXTR A   *   "NEGATI VE TAXABLE PAY, INAC T
                           Basic entry in IT :
       Processing at End of Selection
Regards.
Sam

Is this issue in the live production system? Person left in August, but you only became aware of it in November?I am not too sure what can be done in this case, Schema GRET works for us only if retro is restricted to one period i.e if you are running November payroll, it should only retro for October.
If you facing this issue in test system try running October payroll using schema GRET. I will think about this some more in the meantime.

UK Payroll Issue :Gross Wage Type /101 missing from RT

Hi,
We are facing an issue for some of the employees wherein Gross wage
type /101 is not being generated when payroll is run .In place of /101 , /A01 wage type
is getting created.
This issue is being faced by employees whose claims were entered in
March ( Payroll Period 12 2008) to be paid in April ( Payroll Period 01
2009)
If anybody knows ,please let me know why its happening like that .
Thanks in advance.
Anupama

Hi Surya,
Folowing is the log for employee not getting claims.
/101 Total gross                                                       633.52
/105 Working net                                                       475.08
/111 EE's Pensio                                                       633.52
/121 Taxable pay                                                       617.38
/124 Pre-tax ded                                                        35.94-
/131 NIable pay                                                        633.52
/132 Regular NIa                                                       633.52
/141 Arrestable                                                        493.78
/211 Salary relv                                                       633.52
/212 Salary relv                                                       653.32
/302 Employer NI                                                        25.64
/501 Tax paid                                                          123.60
/550 Statutory n                                                       475.08
/552 Retro. net                                                         18.70
/559 Bank transf              01                                       493.80
/560 Amount paid                                                       493.80
/5A4 Sal.AWE bas                                                        19.80
/5C2 Retro arstb                                                        18.70
/5T2 Retro.taxbl                                                        18.70
/5T4 Retro.preta                                                         1.10-
/700 WT plus ER                                                        659.16
/840 Diff.curr.f01                                   1.77
/851 Total hours                                   103.18
/P20 Tax-free pe                                                        34.84
/V03 Net Pay fro                  V 03                                   0.02
/V41 ME: arrest.                                                         0.02
/VNS ME: NI paid                             25.64   2.00              653.34
/VT3 ME:Taxable                                                          0.02
/VT4 ME:Tax Paid
9001 Local Gover                                                        34.84
9101 Local Gover          0002    O 02                                 126.07
9201 LG Tax Free                                                        34.84
9N39 Cost dist.o          0002                                          25.64
9NZ3 Cost dist o          0002    O 02                                  25.64
9P01 Cost dist.o                                                       126.07
3 /001 Main Hourly01                       62,173.06
3 /002 WTD under 501                       71,026.95
3 /003 WTD over 5y01                       72,617.95
3 /004 Schools Spe01                       71,250.13
3 /005 Valuation b01                            6.25
3 /010 Daily Rate 01                       204361.29
3 /011 Daily Rate 01                       204361.29
3 /012 Daily Rate 01                       204361.29
3 /013 Daily Rate 01                       204361.29
3 /250 Salary summ                                                       633.52
3 /251 Basic Annua01                                                   7,602.24
3 /252 Total Annua01                                                   7,602.24
3 1000 Basic Pay (01                                                     633.52
Following is the log for employee getting claims
/105 Working net                                                     2,761.26
/111 EE's Pensio                                                     3,166.86
/121 Taxable pay                                                     2,028.22
/131 NIable pay                                                      3,166.86
/133 Irregular N                                                     3,166.86
/141 Arrestable                                                      1,622.62
/211 Salary relv                                                     3,166.86
/212 Salary relv                                                     2,028.22
/501 Tax paid                                                          405.60
/550 Statutory n                                                     2,761.26
/551 Stat.net re                                                     3,166.86-
/552 Retro. net                                                      2,028.22
/553 Recalc.diff                                                     3,166.86-
/5A1 Sal.AWE bas                                     1.00
/5A3 Sal.AWE bas                                                     3,166.86-
/5A4 Sal.AWE bas                                                     2,028.22
/5C1 Arstble ern                                                     3,166.86-
/5C2 Retro arstb                                                     2,028.22
/5T1 Txbl.pay re                                                     3,166.86-
/5T2 Retro.taxbl                                                     2,028.22
/700 WT plus ER                                                      3,166.86
/840 Diff.curr.f01                                   2.80
/851 Total hours                                   162.80
/A01 Total gross                                                     3,166.86
/V01 Net Pay on                                                      1,622.62
3 /001 Main Hourly01                       190940.93
3 /002 WTD under 501                       218132.27
3 /001 Main Hourly01                       190940.93
3 /002 WTD under 501                       218132.27
3 /003 WTD over 5y01                       223018.42
3 /004 Schools Spe01                       218817.70
3 /005 Valuation b01                           19.19
3 /010 Daily Rate 01                       990267.74
3 /011 Daily Rate 01                       990267.74
3 /012 Daily Rate 01                       990267.74
3 /013 Daily Rate 01                       990267.74
3 /250 Salary summ                                                     3,069.83
3 /251 Basic Annua01                                                  36,837.96
3 /252 Total Annua01                                                  36,837.96
3 1270 Notional Ba01                                                   3,069.83
3 3715 Claim WTD >01                       223018.42 142.00            3,166.86
I have also got this info.
Retroaction and End of Year
Purpose
If you need to use retroaction over end of year, for example when overtime entered in period 12 is to be paid in period 1, or backdated pay increases applied in the new tax year are to start in the previous tax year, you can do this without this changing any statutory balances in the previous tax year.
Process Flow
If you make any changes over end of year that trigger retroaction, this will not affect the statutory balances in the previous tax year.
However, a change that affects total gross, for example, will be recorded and summed into a wage type called /A01 (Total Gross). The /A01 value will feed a wage type called /Z01 (Total Gross), which will be passed across to the new tax year, ensuring that any retro differences will only affect statutory cumulatives in the new tax year, but will not compromise period 12 statutory cumulatives that may already have been used for end of year reporting.
The following wage types were introduced to enable retroaction over end of year:
u2022     /A01
u2022     /A12
u2022     /AMP
u2022     /AP0
u2022     /AP1
u2022     /ASP
u2022     /Z01
u2022     /Z12
u2022     /ZMP
u2022     /ZP0
u2022     /ZP1
u2022     /ZSP
Thanks and Regards,
Anupama

UK Payroll Issue : Tax Adjustment Wage Type E501

Hi,
We are facing an issue when inputting Tax adjustment wage type E501 to adjust previous year's tax retroactively.
When we enter wage type E501 with tax adjustment amount in IT0015 for the period 12 2008 ( March) and run payroll for current period ( May 2009) The remuneration Statement shows weird results.
For example :
For an employee we entered Wagetype E501 with amount +£20.00 with a date of 31/3/09 in May. The pay has been calculated and the tax due to be deducted in May is £568.60. The payslip shows £588.60 (£568.60 + -£20.00) and it also shows £588.60 for a retrospective pay period (*) this figure should not appear at all. Again the payslip does not balance but it would if the correct tax amount of £568.60 only showed on the payslip.
E501 is purely an adjustment to the Year to Date cumulatives it is not a deduction (or refund) to the employee and therefore should not affect the payslip.
UK Payroll gurus please help me sort out this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Anupama

Hi Surya,
Thanks for the reply.
I have checked and found out that subschema ZNTO ( GNTO) contains ZEOY(GEOY) and this is how it looks. Please let me know if any changes are to be made to the PCR .
ZEOY Adjustment to results table RT
      E101 /101 adjustment
      E112 /112 adjustment
      E121 /121 adjustment
      E501 /501 adjustment
        ADDWTE*    RT   Results table
        ADDWTE/501 RT   Results table
      E505 /505 adjustment
      E506 /506 adjustment
      ECSL /CSL EOY Adjustment
      EP20 /P20 adjustment
      EP21 /P21 adjustment
      ESPY /SPY adjustment
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Anupama

Payroll issue with Teachers

Hi
Wondering if anyone has come across this issue.
Currently we use a 3rd party application for processing Payroll (not Oracle Payroll).
We are currently being advised that for Teacher pension records to be correct, if that person takes flexible retirement or changes job - because of their basis of service - they have to get a completely new employee record - i.e a new employee number. Thus currently in HR we are having to terminate and then re-create the employee, leading to a lot of extra work and also making the data in the system look odd as the same person can have 3 or 4 employee records.
I guess I'm wondering what other places do with Teachers (if any local authority types are on here who deal with this)?
Cheers
Martin

The function REMWR writes the results of function REMIT to the respective tables in a TemSe file. This is only performed at the end of the evalaution schema processing.
This function should only be used in evaluation schema X500 (according to the respective country). Since it is not carried out for each personnel number but at the end of the selection procedure.
Check this and also are you getting some error in that. If yes then let us know, else try to debug the funtion with the help of abaper.
Edited by: praveen.hcm on May 10, 2011 6:12 PM

Payroll Issues in Net payment

Dear Experts,
Business Scenario
The employee is on leave for 2 months (paid leave)in that 2 months loan should not deduct. 3rd month he came back and the laon amount should be deduct .
So,In Master Data for IT45 maintained record for those 2months in "Condition" amount=0 and for the next month onwards maintained regular installment payment which he has to pay.
When I am running payroll for the 3rd month am getting Loan Type Error as below
Error with a loan wage type
A loan wage type in table RT should be deducted, however the
however the remaining net amount was too small
Wage type /LRP
Please lower the loan repayment in infotype 0045
Choose an amount that can be deducted
while running simulation for 4th Month their is no Error in Payroll Log But for the 3rd Month "NET PAYMENT" is showing as Zero in Payslip and not showing in RT table also
Note: This Net Payment issue for the 3rd Month is not only to the above scenario Employee it is not showing for ALL EMPLOYEES.
Kindly help me in resolving this issue as this is Very Very High, your immediate response is highly Appreciable
Regards,
Rao.

Dear....
Please check that u press the calendar button to regenerate the last payment date and also check that repayment plan in IT0045
another thing check IT0078, what will be shown there????.
After that run one by one payroll for the months you have no deduction of loan and check is there any loan deduction or not.
What you have to do for skipping loan payment is copy the current loan and make the repayment amount zero, i hope u did the same but in the last split u have to recalculate the payment date.

Polish payroll issue: FP/FGSP

Hi Anyone,
I'm in the process of applying three OSS notes for Poland payroll.
The OSS note of my concern is #1323028. This note required three
prerequisites; 1297363, 1316576, and 1317569. I have susscessfully
applied note 1316576. Note 1317569 rejected because it was expecting
the prerequisite note 1297363.
In January of this year, I applied OSS note 1298110. Note 1298110
specifically states "In case you have not yet applied the note 1297363,
it is enough to import the above mentioned transport because it
contains the full and corrected ABAP coding of the legal change
described in note 1297363." Note 1297363 also issues a caution and
refers to note 1298110.
Now, as a result of only applying 1298110, the subsequent notes 1316576
and 1323028 are not accepted due to the prerequisite discrepancy.

Hi,
The way you described the issue, seems that you have correctly applied OSS notes. Though, the OSS note 1298110 mention about full and corrected ABAP code which you applied and still facing an issue.
1. Can you check, if the latest version for the same oss note 1298110 is released by SAP (SAP does that very often, if they have missed somthing in previous version of same oss note.)
2. If point number 1 is satisfied, then it is advised that to write to SAP and explain the issue. It can be issue form SAP side.
Thank you,
Abhay

Payroll Issue

Dear Gurus,
Please provide me with your knowledgeable input....
1st/ My question here is what is the significance & importance of Allowance Grouping in payroll-India scenario.....i have gone through the other posts but could get a clear understanding.....
2nd/ Importance of Generate Payroll period and its relationship with control record.
Can you all please put forward your views on this, i will be really thankful to you all.

Hi,
1) Answer: You can get below answer by clicking the documentation of " Define Pay Scale Groupings for Allowances"
you define pay scale groupings for allowances to differentiate between employee groups. These groupings determine which benefits apply to a particular group of employees.
Example
Consider a company Thumbtacks Pvt Ltd., with two levels of managers and three levels of regular employees. We will define allowance groupings, such that each level of managers or employees get the benefits entitled to them as per the employers policies.
To enable this :
1. Identify the different benefits each person is entitled to
2. Create groupings for each category, and assign the privileges
We can now proceed to create employee groupings starting with the top management. Working down the corporate ladder we have:
o MN01 for senior managers who receive the benefit of a company provided House, Computer, Medical Allowance, Car with a driver and an additional 5% Provident Fund (PF) contribution from the employer.
o MN02 for junior managers who receive the benefit of a company provided Medical Allowance, Car and an additional 5% PF contribution from the employer.
o EE01 for senior employees who receive the benefit of a company provided Car and Cellular
Phone.
o EE02 for junior employees who receive the benefit of a company provided Cellular Phone only.
o EE03 for office boys who receive the benefit of a lunch allowance
In a similar manner, you can create any number of 'Pay Scale Groupings for Allowance' based on the different benefits you wish to provide for your employees.
Activities
3. Enter a four digit alphanumeric value for each pay scale grouping for allowances in the AlGrp field.
4. Enter a description for the grouping in the Allowance grp desc field and save your entries.
2) Answer: You can get below answer by clicking the documentation of "Generate Payroll Periods"
you use the report RPUCTP00 (Generate Payroll Periods) to generate the date specifications for a selected period for the payroll periods that are to be valid in your system. For each period parameter that is assigned to a payroll area, the system requires the following date specifications:
o Start date and end date of each payroll period
o Payment date of each payroll period
When you execute the report RPUCTP00, the system creates these dates according to the data that you enter in the report's selection screen.
Example
You generate the payroll periods for the period parameters monthly for the years 1999 to 2004. The start and end dates of the periods should be the same as the start and end dates of the calendar months. The periods' payment dates should be three days before the end of the period.
Requirements -
In the step Check Payroll Area, which is in this section of the Implementation Guide (IMG), you have assigned a period parameter to all the payroll areas.
Standard settings -
There are no entries in the standard system.
Recommendation
Generate the payroll periods for several years in advance.
Activities -
1. In the selection screen of the report, enter the required data and run the report.
2. Check the date specifications that the system has generated for the payroll periods and the payment dates.
Further notes -
You must run the report separately for each combination of period parameter and date modifier that is assigned to a payroll period.
Bhairavareddy

HR REPORT about GET PAYROLL ISSUE!

HI
i using LDB pnp to report about PY data!
i get PY data using GET PAYROLL!
one case occurs as follow:
search one person(99005500) using personid number i will get result ok!
all other condition not change! just in personid(pernr-pernr) condition, i put mass person id!
in these person, some id < 9900500, in this time, the person id 99005500 some period py data
can't display out!
i have to check period list using call method pay->read_result
                                                       IMPORTING
                                                             list = mylist. in GET PERNR !
i find mylist have different!
in first scene:
    mylist data contain all data about this person: begin with 20060110
but in last scene:
    mylist data contain data just begin with 20080804
so i think miss py data cause by mylist change !
i in SAP demo code:EXAMPLE_PNP_GET_PAYROLL i have saw:
You can use the methods of class "pay" to read and modify
the list of payroll result that is going to be processed at
the <get payroll> event. However, these method calls might
change with the next release.
CREATE OBJECT pay.
pay->LDB = 'SAPDB_MY_OWN_LDB'. "only if you copied the LDB PNP
CALL METHOD pay->read_result IMPORTING list = mylist.
"delete mylist index 2. "For example: Remove an unwanted payroll result
CALL METHOD pay->write_result EXPORTING list = mylist.
what happend in LDB PNP! how to get mylist i want?
because using CALL METHOD pay->read_result IMPORTING list = mylist. will cause error!
help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thank you advance!

Hi,
Refer this link https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/3180. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
Regards,
Flavya

Off Cycle Payroll Issue

Hi Gurus
I Ran off Cycle Payroll and got Result.
then Ran Regular payroll but the OffCycle Payroll Also running and amount is Added in net in Regular Payroll.

Dear Skindar
We have done as you mentioned only
The Scenario is
We Are going live by running April to Augest2011 live payroll and for Sep2011 We are going to Post in FI.
I.E April to Aug2011 no FI posting.
We Ran 20.04.2011 off Cycle by keeping Control Record in Exit Mode in mArch2011
Then Ran regular payroll April2011, here it is running for two periods. (Off Cycle and Regular)
Kindly advise me in this

Urgent requirement: Payroll Issue

Hi Folks!!!!
Any one help me out ...how to get sum of /701 and /q01 from results table .I need to write PCR.
when i can see /Q01 in RT table or when the system generates /Q01 in RT ???
Points will be rewarded
Thanks
Mike

This process is carried out on ordinary and adjustment payroll runs using the VERPVH function. The general process consists of the following steps:
●     The system searches for data required to carry out calculation. This data is:
○     The Employee Normal Wage (SNE) in accordance with employee payroll cycle (/0NS).
○     The Statutory Minimum Wage (VEMIN field in table T511P).
○     The T511K table constants corresponding to the RPVH payment.
○     Employee Contribution Amount (/701).
○     Company contribution amount (/702).
Example
Employee Salary:                           750,000.00
RPVH Maximum Wage:                  562,500.00
Calculation Base:                           562,500.00
Employee Deduction Amount:             5,625.00
Company Contribution Amount:   11,250.00
REWARD POINTS

Help required with payroll issue

i got an issue with Wt 9avc we have one employee on partime who is processed for maternity leave from july 2008 every thing looks fine except her avc salary sacrifice which is at 1%of her salary so can any help help me how to go forward and what steps i need to configure.
many thanks
dasari

Hi,
you can not copy function as i know. you should create a new one and copy code from the existing function to new function and modify code for the new requirement. this will be mush easier.
Çağatay

SAP HR Payroll Issue

HI Experts,
my client requirement X loans need to be configure in it0045, in the payslip each loan should appear seperately with repayment amt,total repayment amt, loan balance etc.... its a interest free loans. as i done loan configuration part in img and created each loan 4 wagetypes . how to configure these 4 wage types in loan rules.
your co-op highly appreciated, its urgent requirement for me. pls get me out from this issue..............................................
Points will be rewarded
Sunny

Hi
One way u need to write a PCR.
Inorder to get the loan amt and balance saperately, you have to maintain some dummy wage types for each loan amt and same balance.
All the loans amounts will be cummulated to /LOP WT in XlON rule, before it cummulates write a rule the amount to be sent in dummy WG created and same display it in payslip.
In the same way the balances will be cummulated in /LLP WT, do the Same process.......

UK Payroll Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for