Port 443 and 80 are blocked in FolderShare

Hi,
I'm using FolderShare to sync my iMac with a WinXP laptop, but it only works one-way. The Mac dosn't accept any connections from the laptop.
In the settings for FolderShare i can see that port 443 and 80 are blocked. I have tried port forwarding these ports to my static ip, but it dosn't work on the mac. FolderShare support says that this a mac problem, so i guess i have to open these ports somehow. Can you help?
I don't have the OSX firewall enabled.

No, it really shouldn't be the router, if you're both on the same side. Except...it seems that this foldershare might be using a proxy to work its magic.
(check router for any firewall settings, and disable them during this testing.)
I was able to make this work on a mac>PC and PC>mac on the same side of the router, but the folderShare settings test also told me that ports were blocked. (it still worked)
You know...I would probably start file sharing, and possibly web sharing. I have both those enabled on my little mini-mac. Enable those in the sharing tab, leave the firewall alone for now.

Similar Messages

Ichat is not working. tried using port 443 and still does not work

ichat not working. tried using port 443 and i stay on for about 45 seconds then it disconnects. Can you help?

HI,
Can you tell me the make and model of your routing device.
The 10 Second error message is caused by a break in the connection.
This could be the Wifi being dropped (if you are using WiFi) due to interference from other nearby routers.
It can be dues to setting or features of the router and if the experience has changed that could be due to a speed increase in your internet service.
If you are using Ethernet and having this issue it is much more likely to be a setting/feature issue.
Examples.
Netgears. These have a separate WAN set up page that lists either DoS or SPI as one of the things that can be Enabled or Disabled.
Linksys. If your model has a Security tab and this has Firewall then DoS and SPI are port of this.
Netopia devices Tend to have a 4 level Firewall which DoS and SPI are part of the two highest settings.
DoS = Denial Of Service and is a Threshold based "Protection" Feature.
it judges whether too much data is being sent to you (it was designed originally to stop people overloading Web Servers (many people, many refreshes).
iChat can outstrip the setting with most Internet Connections in most part of the world. (In fact iChat can send more data than most Video Streaming sites)
One thing you can do that may get around this is to reduce the Bandwidth used in iChat (iChat Menu > Preferences > Video Section > Bandwidth Limit drop down)
Try 500kbps
10:07 PM Wednesday; November 23, 2011
Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"
 iMac 2.5Ghz 5i 2011 (Lion 10.7.2)
 G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
 MacBookPro 2Gb (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)
 Mac OS X (10.6.8),
"Limit the Logs to the Bits above Binary Images."  No, Seriously

Stratus tunneling over ports 443 and/or 80

Would it be possible to have Stratus listen on ports 443 and
80; and would Flash Player 10 indeed fall back to those ports, as
with FMS?
I am dealing with a customer who has difficulty opening 1935
due to corporate policies.
I have no information about port 10000+. Hopefully they pose
no problem.
Kind Regards,
Frans

The older RTMP operates over TCP port 1935 and falls back to
tunneling over 443 and/or 80.
The newer RTMFP uses UDP and requires the ability to make
outbound connections to 1935 and also higher port numbers in order
to establish a server connection.
Running over port 443 and 80 UDP wouldn't help, the firewall
is likely configured to open up TCP 443 (HTTPS) and TCP 80 (HTTP)
while still blocking UDP.
If your application needs to work in the presence of
UDP-blocking firewalls (and note that we do several things to get
through them, if they do allow internally-initiated UDP sessions),
you'll need to code your own fallback to a TCP protocol like RTMP
or HTTP.

IP Virtual Host w/SSL serving on port 80 and 443

We have an OS 10.3.8 system and we've configured several virtual hosts using the system admin panel. One IP has several hosts on it. We have a seperate IP with one virtual host on it since it is running SSL. I have it configured for port 443 and I have all the security certificates installed OK. The site operates correctly over HTTPs. If I try to access it with standard HTTP I get a service not available error (which makes sense since server admin sets the config files to port 443 ... not 80).
The only way I can get it to work is to add another virual host in server admin running on that IP at port 80. Unfortunately, that means it will be logged seperately (which I don't really want it to do). What do I need to change to get a single virtual host on a specific IP to respond correctly to both 443 and 80 using the file layout generated by server admin (I can modify them manually)?
Thanks in advance ...
Tom

>The only way I can get it to work is to add another virual host in server admin running on that IP at port 80.
That's correct. That's how you run a site as both HTTP and HTTPS - they're two sites.
> Unfortunately, that means it will be logged seperately
Why? You can set both sites to use the same log file and their hits will be combined in a single file.
> What do I need to change to get a single virtual host on a specific IP to respond correctly to both 443 and 80 using the file layout generated by server admin (I can modify them manually)?
You can't, but if your issue is the logging, my answer above should take care of that.

Remote Connectivity Analyzer opens port 443 successfully but fails.."Net. conn. not available"

Trying to set up a client with external access. I just got their Edge off the domain and in the DMZ, and supposedly the appropriate firewall ports are opened. They have a RP running IIS ARR.
Microsoft Remote Connectivity Analyzer (testconnectivity.Microsoft.com) does the following for three tests:
1. When I do Lync Server Remote Connectivity Test and choose Autodiscover, it is able to open port 443 and it validates the cert. But it says "Operation failed because the network connection was not available".
2. When I do the same Lync Server Remote Connectivity Test and manually enter the Access Edge service FQDN and choose port 5061, it is able to resolve the name in DNS but it then fails testing TCP port 5061 with "The specified port is either blocked,
not listening, or not producing the expected response".
3. When I do the Lync Autodiscover Web Service Remote Connectivity Test, it fails when trying to open port 443 on the Lyncdiscover URL.
So, that seems to indicate to me that port 443 might be open on the Edge but not the Reverse Proxy, since that's where the autodiscover URL points. And it seems 5061 is not open but 443 is on the Edge. What else could I check on the Edge to get
443 working?
Thanks for the help and sorry for any vague information. Any help is appreciated!
Brandon

Okay, I can now telnet to lyncdiscover.mydomain.dom on port 443 successfully, and I can telnet to sip.mydomain.com on 5061 successfully.
Now when I do the remote connectivity test:
Using Autodiscover to detect server settings, I get "Operation failed because the network connection was not available". It opens port 443 fine it looks like.
Manually choosing lync.mydomain.com as the FQDN and port 5061, I get "The endpoint was unable to register. See the ErrorCode for specific reason". Response code is 504 and response message is Server Time-out
Doing the Lync Autodiscover Web Service Remote Connectivity Test I get "HTTP 403 error was received because ISA server denied the specified URL".
Looks to me like a rule might not be set right on the firewall if ISA is denying the connection, right?(they are using TMG on a server running Server 2008 as the firewall). I can't ping the reverse proxy from the firewall (but I can ping the Edge).
What else can I check?
Thanks for all the help so far, I really appreciate it.
Brandon

Non SSL website on port 443

Hi, I have a non-SSL website running on port 443. When I access this website using Chrome or IE it works just fine, but Firefox can't seem to accept what I have done. All browsers on the same machine and using the same web proxy.
I access the website as http://xyz:443.
Just a bit of background info as to why I need this. Where I work I can only access ports 443 and 80 via the web proxy. I have two distinct websites running on a couple of devices at home behind a very config-wise limited router which has ports 80 and 443 redirected to these hosts. There is no way for me to setup two port forward rules on port 80 to two different devices. I cannot setup SSL on either of the websites.
Regardless of options that could exist to overcome my particular issue, I would like to check if you guys know how to make Firefox work with a website running on port 443 whilst not having a certificate assigned to it.
Firefox 32.0.3
Error message:
The connection was reset
The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading.
The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments.
If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network connection.
If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.

What type of ssl are you running? [https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2014/10/14/the-poodle-attack-and-the-end-of-ssl-3-0/]
You can somehow remove the Strict-Transport-Security header or if there is a feature that forced encryption but by default https uses 443 for encryption. I do not know if this is possible.

Port 443 used by another web site

All was working well with my evaluation of 2012E. I was able to log on the the access anywhere website. Now the service stopped working and if I try to start the "default website" I get an error message that another website may be using port 443
and it will not start. I checked the bindings on all the stock sites and none used 443 except the default site. I am able to vpn to the server with no issues. I tried messing with the Cert and that did not help. I have probably tweaked things trying to fix
it that has made it worse. I can see nothing else using 443. I read about the folder share issue but the service is not on the service list. I would like to be able to turn back the clock but that option is not available.
Thanks, Ckshan

In PowerShell run this:
Import-Module WebAdministration
Get-ChildItem IIS:\Sites
Post back the result.
Robert Pearman SBS MVP
itauthority.co.uk |
Title(Required)
Facebook |
Twitter |
Linked in |
Google+

PrintSetting, ColorManagement, PrintOption, ExtensionSetting, are blocked

PrintSetting, ColorManagement, PrintOption, ExtensionSetting, are blocked in Aperture. I noticed in Word i can use these settings for the paper i am useing and Aperture will not hold these settings. I have an Epson R1800 and have downloaded the latest drivers and the latest updates for Aperture on my 2006 Macbook with intel duocore. I believe the problem is in Aperture and not Epson. The newest driver from Epson is for the duocore so this should work. I am not sure why these settings are not blocked in some programs and are blocked in other programs like aperture? Any ideas out there?
Jivan

Hi Jivan,
Have you tried this ??
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=302821
Hope it helps.
Merry Christmas
Chris

Linksys WRT300N Open port 443, Lease Time

Hello. Definite Newbie here.
I have my router's IP address up on my browser and I was wondering how to open port 443 and to make my "Lease time" at its maximum. Can someone help me?
Thanks in advance.
Erik

pen an Internet Explorer browser page on a computer hard wired to the router...In the address bar type - 192.168.1.1...Leave the Username blank & in Password use admin in lower case...
Once you login to the setup page of your Router, under the setup tab below change the DHCP Client lease time from to 0 to any number to increase the lease time.
Then click on the "Application and Gaming" tab and below click on the sub tab "Port Forwarding" and below in the Application name type any name and then in the Start Port and End Port type the Port number and select the Protocol and input the IP address on which you want to Forward the Port and check the box and click on save settings..
You can follow this link and it will help you in forwarding the port on your router.

One site does not load on iPad/iPhone when only few port like 80, 443 and 53 are allowed

Hi All,
I have a router which does port blocking allows access through certain ports only. The allowed port list include 80,8080,443 and 53 however I cannot seem to be able to connect to www.argos.co.uk using safari on iPad and iPhone. Both runs iOs 8.3. Access to other sites works without any problem.
Access to www.argos.co.uk site works fine when accessed through Android or Windows devices through the same router. Any idea what could be the problem ?

I can replicate this problem on a number of other sites!
If I lock the router to just use the main ports like 80, 8080, 443 & 53 and use an Apple device to view www.diy.com or www.boots.com the sites take 10 times longer to load than when the router has all its ports open. I have tried a MacBook, iPad and iPhone with Safari and another browser.
If I do the same tests using Microsoft or Android devices the sites load quickly with the routers ports locked on unlocked.
Does this suggest that Apple are relying on non essential ports for web traffic?

Ports 500 and 4500 are blocked

Sometime in the past week, Verizon started blocking ports 500 and 4500. This shuts down VOIP. The Verizon agents I spoke to about this told me the only solution available would require my paying between $49 and $140 in order to get access to Expert DSL Technical Support. I find this policy disappointing.

I understand ports 500 and 4500 to be for VPN, not VOIP?
Either way, they should not be blocking ports out. Unless the ports are known dangerous ports.
Other carriers (primarily DSL) are starting to block these services. My personal opinion is so they can charge business rates for home users who may occasionally connect to workplaces securely.
Just another poor business decision on their part.

How can I set up a WD My Cloud with my Airport Extreme - I can't get it to open ports 80 and 443?

For remote internet access to the WD My Cloud Mirror, I have been advised that ports 80 and 443 must be open in order to reach the WDMyCloudMirror. My Motorola Gateway (Surfboard SB6141) is connected directly to my Airport Extreme (WAN port) which is in turn connected to the WDMyCloudMirror (all by ethernet cables). I do not have FULL instructions on how to properly manually configure the Airport Extreme to open the ports. I have tried an earlier posting which provides many of the steps, but not all of the required information is included (how to determinge the IP address to be assigned, etc.). I did the best I could with the information given, but the test using "YouGetSignal" showed the ports as still closed and attemps to reach the WDMyCloudMirror by the internet failed as well (of course). The WDMyCloudMirror has enough Apple "stuff" included in it (software, I suspect) that an Apple legal acceptance is required for its set-up, yet Western Digital Tecnical Support is unable (or unwilling?) to help with this aspect of its configuration required to work within the Airport Extreme environment. I have returned the WD My Cloud Mirror to Amazon as "not able to work", but I have not given up the hope that I can eventually get the ports open so that I can get this cloud device, or one similar, to permit remote internet access.

Port Forwarding.....or Port Mapping....as Apple calls it is a difficult and complex configuration method for most users. Because there are so many variables involved in this type of setup, it is not possible to provide a step by step guide that will work for everyone with all devices.
It is possible that a setup guide exists for the the WD drive and AirPort Extreme, but you will have to go looking for it on the Internet. Even if you find one, it may not be tailored to your specific situation or needs.
Sometimes, you can do everything right....at least according to someone's article or "how to" guide, and things still will not work correctly.
In situations like this, when you really don't know what to do, you need to enlist the aid of an IT pro, who will know what to do based on your particular products and unique circumstances. Sometimes....they won't be able to get things working either due to particular circumstances.
But, before you do this, I would strongly recommend that you use a Static IP address for your Internet connection with your ISP. If you do not have this now, contact them to ask them if they offer this type of connection. Expect to pay more for this type of service, of course.

VNICs (both uplinks and VM's vNIC) are blocked on N5K DVS after upgrading to ESXi 5.1

Hello Gents,
I cought into weird situation after upgrade VMware ESXi 5.0 to 5.1 on UCS C200M2. Before upgrade I have had server with configured static adapter-fex VNICS and floating/dynamic vm-fex interfaces working perfectly in DirectPathIO mode for VMs. Initial deployment was done according Cisco N5K VM-fex operation guide for   NX-OS 5.1(3)N1(1). There were vCenter 5.1, 2xN5K and 2xC200M with ESXi 5.0 integrated so that N5K DVS was brought to vCenter and hosts could be added to DVS. One of C200M2 (still on ESXi5.0) has no problem while operating VM-Fexs and adapter-fexs while part of its uplinks are on VSS and othe part on DVS (in fact there are none VMs on VSS, so all the workloads use DVS).
But upgraded C200M cannot operate with DVS correctly: any vmks, vm networks, VMs connected to DVS lose network connectivity.
Attached picture illustrates diag of connectivity status (uplinks/ets are blocked).
VEM are fresh and running:
~ # vem status -v
Package vssnet-esxmn-next-release
Version 4.2.1.2.2.1a.0-3.1.1
Build 1
Date Sat Sep 28 18:47:14 PDT 2013
VEM modules are loaded
Switch Name      Num Ports   Used Ports Configured Ports MTU     Uplinks
vSwitch0         128         6           128               1500    vmnic0,vmnic1
DVS Name         Num Ports   Used Ports Configured Ports MTU     Uplinks
N5KDVS-1         256         14          256               1500    vmnic3,vmnic2
VEM Agent (vemdpa) is running
~ #
~ # esxcli software vib list | grep cisco
cisco-vem-v162-esx             4.2.1.2.2.1a.0-3.1.1                Cisco     PartnerSupported 2013-11-11
Do anybody have an idea why it is going wrong?

Of course they exist.There is unpatched server with ESXi 5.0 near upgraded server and it works perfectly.
Finally I downgraded server to ESXi5.0 again and VM-FEX functionality restored.

Child DC cannot Replicate to Parent DC, because of connection errors. MS PortQryUI shows that ports 3268 and 3269 are not listening,

I started a support case with Microsoft to help me with raising the our domain Forest level because i received a message stating that there were Windows 2000 PDC still listed in the database. These PDCs were removed years ago. The tech saw all of the problems
i was having with domain replication so that is where he started. running the MS PortQryUI shows that ports 3268 and 3269 are not listening, (TCP port 3268 (unknown service): NOT LISTENING) when run FROM a Child domain controller against the Parent
Domain controller. Between the 2 Child domain controllers these ports are listening.
The Windows firewall is not running on any of the controllers, i removed a virus protect client from all of the servers, although i didn't enable the firewall there either, but these ports are still not listening on the Parent DC.
I need help debugging this. I am not very familiar with network sniffers so if i need to run one i'll need some guidance. This DC only has one NIC, all IP addresses are static, all servers are setup like this. All servers are in the same subnet, on the same
lan, on the same cisco switch, there shouldn't be anything blocking this port from starting.
I looked over other post that show this same problem, but they don't give a solution. If i am not using the Windows firewall why wouldn't these ports be open?
Any ideas? web searches are all over the map on trying to find the reason for this.
Bobby

Try running the below command on the DCs that you think have the ports blocked or all the DCs.
netdiag /test:ipsec /debug > c:\dcname-ipseclog.log
Open that from the C drive and see if there is anything saying block or filters.
Also, just for kicks have you disabled the firewall service on the DCs?
And just for kicks have you tried enabling firewalls ports on all the DCs? The KB is below
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555381/en-us
Step 1 - netdiag results
Step 2 - disable the firewall service on all DCs if step 1 was negative
Step 3 - enable the firewalls on all DCs per KB 555381 if step 2 doesn't work
Let us know how it goes!
If it answered your question, remember to “Mark as Answer”.
If you found this post helpful, please “Vote as Helpful”.
Postings are provided “AS IS” with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Active Directory: Ultimate Reading Collection

How to open ports 119 and 443 in my Mac?

I've been trying to use the UseNeXT software with my Mac with no success. I called their support and they told me I need to open the ports 119 and 443. I contact Apple support and they told me that is beyond their scope (???).
Can somebody help me with that? I tried to find it online, but all tutorials that i tried didn't work or are outdated.
Thanks

Hi Drew,
It probably depends on the router as to the method used to open the ports.
As I have said elsewhere in the thread the first 1024 ports are open in most router to allow things to work Out of the Box such as Mail (110, 25, 567, 569, 995, 996 and many more ) and web Browsing (port 80 mostly but secure site can use 443) FTP (21 and 22) to name some.
Port Forwarding is one way to open some of the ports for One IP (computer).
Most routers have table for doing this and this can be limited as to the number of ports included.
This Linksys pic shows how to do it for some as it allows groups based on Start and end ports. However it restricts it to one IP
DMZ is a form of Extreme Port Forwarding that opens all 65535 ports to one IP (Computer)
In both the above cases other computers (IP addresses) are excluded from using the ports.
Port Triggering doe allow multiple computers to access the same Port but requires that you know the lead - Trigger - port involved for each app.
It is limited by the table size for your particular router.
Same Router in Trigger ports for iChat 3
Most router come with UPnP nowadays.
It is an ON/Off setting that allows the apps on the computer to say which ports are needed and when.
On some you can reduce the time to live and the Hop amounts.
The ports stay open from a period of normally 30 mins after non use.
This can be changed.
It also tends to list the number of Hops (the number of devices beyond the UPnP device) that it can be heard.
My Sky Hub
I have no other router on my network but I do sometimes use Internet Sharing between two computers hence the 2 Hops.
Every other device is only one Hop away from the the router.
There are concerns that the "Advertisement" is seen upstream (internet side) as well as device downstream.
The Concern is that this could be Up to your ISP and then down to the "next" IP end user on the particular router/server at the ISP end.
I have seen no evidence of this being the case.
Hope this helps.
8:45 pm Monday; May 5, 2014
 iMac 2.5Ghz i5 2011 (Mavericks 10.9)
 G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
 MacBookPro 2Gb (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)
 Mac OS X (10.6.8),
 Couple of iPhones and an iPad

Port 443 and 80 are blocked in FolderShare

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for