Position Assignment.

Hi,
I have a scenario where in employee is working on deputation and assigned to a position in the working org unit. But for all positions report, seniority, promotions,  we should consider his position in the base division(not at deputed org unit). Please let me know how can we link original position.
Regards,
Karunakar

Hi,
You have to segregate 2 areas: OM (assignment) and PY (posting).
For OM solution can be as previously suggested to use alternative relationship OR you can assign employee to more than one position in IT0001. To do that you have to run respective action and you will see "ASSIGNEMNT" option that allows to create secon relationship with the employee. Only core/initial relationship will be stored in IT0001, while second one you will only see in IT1001.
For PY (posting), if you use PY module in your system, you should use IT0027 that allows to replace during posting process Cost Center from IT0001 with alternative Cost Center.
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Is there any report where we can see more then one position assigned to emp

    Hi
    Is there any report where we can see more then one position assigned to employee.
    Basically requirement is that some of employees got assigned two positions by mistake, so I want to know the standard report to find out such employees.
    Thanks & Regards
    Rajesh

    Hi,
    Use RHSTRU00 report with object type P and evaluation path P_S_S_C.
    Regards,
    Dilek

  • FM for fetching positions assigned to a BP.

    Hi,
    I need to get the positions assigned to a BP and also users assigned to one particular position of BP.
    Which FM should be used?
    Thanks and Regards
    Shilpi

    Hi shilpi ,
    You can try FM RH_STRUC_GET to get the positions as well as users assigned to the position.
    Hope this will help you.

  • How can I get the position assigned to the user in CRM .

    Hi all ,
    How can we get the positions to which a  user is assigned as a holder in CRM .
    Thanks ,
    Naval bhatt .

    Hi,
         Use the PPM toolkit class CL_CRM_PPM_UM_TOOLKIT. You can use the method You can use the method GET_ASSIGNMENTS_OF_USER which returns positions held by an user(user name).  You may also find the method GET_POSITION_OF_USER useful. It accepts username and the organization ID and will return the positions held by the user under that organization.
      This class always uses the current plan (01). If you want otherwise, you can use the FM RH_STRUC_GET. As to how this FM should be used, look inside the above said methods.
    Regards,
    Arun Prakash
    Edited by: Arun Prakash Karuppanan on May 11, 2010 11:40 AM

  • Is there a BAPI to do SAP HR position assignment to BASIS User

    I am trying to automate the Basis user's assignment to SAP HR position through my .Net client program.
    For this i need to figure out a way. for example calling a BAPI from my client code to do this assignment.
    Any one knows if there exist a BAPI to do this assignment.
    Thanks

    Hi Vinay
    Will you please explain more? <i>What is "the Basis user's assignment"?</i> Can you give an actual example?
    *--Serdar

  • Positions assigned to Org Units

    Dear Consultants,
    There are some designations / Positions (like Clerk / Assistant etc) common in more than one departments. How can we assign it in System?? When we assign any designation to the second department, the first assignment is delimited automatically.
    can we specify that a person is working in a specific org unit? I think it is determined upon the Position.
    Regards
    Bindumadhav
    9869028264

    Hi Bindumadhav,
    Expecting that you are still looking out for replies, let me clarify one thing.
    The Positions that you have mentioned here (like Clerk / Assistant etc) are not Positions, but Jobs. Jobs generally tell you what kind of activity is involved, whereas positions are specific individual employee assignments. You can create a Job and use that to Describe various positions. But each of these positions can Belong to one Org Unit (Department) only.
    Kindly revert back if you require further clarification.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Leena

  • Position Assignment to 1610(US) triggers a Transport Request.

    Hi Seniors,
    i have a problem here that when i create the position through action PP03 as per the OM action setting,when  i go to 1610 Job Attributes USA,it triggers a Transport Request which is unwanted,it does not permitte me to save the data and does not let me go to the 1613 infotype(WC Attributes for JOB).
    The job has already been assigned 1610 and the same job assignment has been done to the position.I have gone through the previous posts and have got to know that it hits the table V_T5U29 and tabl T528B,but sm30 T528B doesnot exits in dictionary.
    I have to maintain the Job with 1610 assignment & the position with 1610 & 1613 among with other INFOTYPES.The action that i have created for position,i have already assigned 1610 & 1613 in sequence but the transport request is unwanted as of now.
    Its causing probelm in DEV & QA for which i am not been able to create new positions.
    Can any body help me out with this problem.
    Edited by: srssaphr09 on Mar 29, 2011 7:46 PM

    Hi Peeyosh,
    Can you tell me how did you achieved.I do have a same Scenario.
    I thought in following way to achieve the btransport of individual calendars.
    I have included the Transport thru SCAL in a Workbench Request.
    I went on to SE10 and double clicked on the Workbench Request in chnage Mode.
    Then i double clicked over the tables.
    THOC ,THOCD , THOCI ,THOCS ,THOL ,THOLU,THOCT ,THOLT .
    Then in each i limited with the Required Calendars,public Holidays to be transported.
    Like i have entered the Calendar id's.
    Do you think this is right approach.I havent tested this option yet.
    Can you anyone suggest me on this.
    Regards,
    Nachy

  • Delimiting positions assigned to a Org Unit

    Hi Everyone,
    HAPPY NEW YEAR!
    I have delimited a organisational unit through PPOME. Now I want to delimit all the positions ( vacant as well as filled positions) associated with that particular org unit.
    Is there any T-Code or program where I can delimit all the positions together or I have to delimit all the positions manually. Please let me know.

    Hi
    As far as i know you cannot delimit a position created.
    We need to close the position status from open to close for the position to be delimited automatically.
    If we try to delimit the position by entering a date the system will overwrite the previous one and create a new position from the next date of the delimited date.
    Ravee
    +91.99206.33669

  • OM- Positions Assignment

    Hi,
    We all know that a position can be occupied  by many persons without exceeding 100%.
    I have a scenario that to create an OM structure with 500+ emps in a particular org unit. If suppose i need to create 50+ operators in engineering and production dept. etc. How to go about it
    Is it mandatory create all 500+ position or any other way it can be handled...l
    Rgds
    Saravanan

    Hi,
    it is always advisable to use 1 person per position.It is important because positions are linked to jobs and if tomorrow you have to implement PD module then this will create a lot of issues.
    So create the number of positions as per your requirement.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks
    Ranjeeta

  • Assign Chief Position to custom OM Object Business Unit

    Hello
    Is it recommended or doable to assign chief position via 012 relationship to the top most custom object Business  Unit. Currently the  chief position relationships is for Org Units. We would like to keep Chief Position to OU, also if possible to create similar 012 relationship to Business Unit. Since Business Unit will have one-to-many relationship with Regions, need is to identify chief position for the Business Unit for reporting purposes.
    Evaluation path for Business Unit - Region - OU - Position - Person.
    Thank you.

    yes, in om structure it will be seen as top most OM object business unit (top most)  region --> o.u. --> position --> person. Can I use 012 relationship of position assigned to top most business unit and keep 012 position relationship to OU.?
    Narrowing down. Currently, chief position relationship is assigned to top OU that is tied to region 1:1 relationship. Now with the new top most custom object business unit has many regions. So need to identify top most region tied to business unit via 012 position.
    Is it possible and how?

  • 1 PERNER to be assigned to 2 Position-India Payroll

    Hi,
    I have this scenario from the client where a QA-GM hold 2 positions of Quality Assurance Manager & Quality Controll manager.
    I have INDIA Payroll to be run.when i hire the person 0001 i have hired the QA MGR position as primary position assignment,what about QC Manager position i am wondering how to go about assigning the QC position to the GM as well & what are the possible impact i am going to face at the time of payroll run.the percentage distribution would be QA MGR-60% & QC MGR-40 % for 3 to 4 months.
    Can i expect to have some knowledge sharing on the same,how to go about the same.
    I need to update the client on this .
    Edited by: srssaphr09 on May 11, 2011 7:25 AM

    Hi,
    I can only think this is a problem with the DHCP scopes or something?
    Are the phones getting their leases from the router or from another source as this may explain why rebooting it didn't help?
    Also, what version of code are you using on the router?
    Please rate useful posts..

  • Using Rule 168, SWX_GET_MANAGER and Chief Position

    We have enabled standard SAP Travel Workflow WS20000040 - Approve Trip.   We are not currently using OM relationships A002 (Reports Line to) or B002 (Is Line Supervisor of).   We currently identify the Line Manager of the employee using the Chief Position designation A 012 and would like to use this for Trip approvals in lieu of building all of these additional relationships.
    Rule 168 is bound to the workflow.  According to the documentation associated with the rule, it seems that the rule should work with either the A002 or A012 relationship.  However, we only seem to be getting a superior identified when relationship A002/B002 exists.  
    Are there additional configuration or parameter settings that we might need to consider to make the manager (agent) determined properly exclusively with the Chief Position assignment?
    Thanks for  any guidance you can provide.
    Regards,
    Edited by: Bruce Hull on Jul 24, 2008 5:37 PM
    Edited by: Bruce Hull on Jul 24, 2008 5:37 PM
    Edited by: Bruce Hull on Jul 24, 2008 7:29 PM

    What I found through trial and error is that rule 168 does indeed evaluate the A012 relationship by default with no change in the standard evaluation path.  In our testing system, the "Chief" postion was not properly assigned.  Once this was resolved, the workflow works properly.
    As a side note, I also learned that you must have the parameter WFLOW VAPOS set for the rule to properly look up the organizational structure when a position (and chief) are vacant.

  • Fading out of Position filed in -IT-0001

    Guys,
    Request to help me in fading out of the Position filed in IT-0001.
    In IT-0001, the POSITION filed in editable....My client wants the POSITION field to be Un editable...
    Pls give any ray on this..
    Best Regards,
    Srikanth S

    Hi Srikant,
    If position field will not be editable, then how your client is going to assign position to employee while Hiring/transfering etc....?
    Are you changing position assignment in OM side?
    If that is the case, then it can be controlled thorugh screen modification (T588M) as mentioned by others.
    Regards,
    Purnima

  • No assignment to org model in PPOME possible

    Hello,
    When I try to assign in the org model/PPOME (ECC6.0) a person to a position, the system allows that for some persons u2013 for some not. If not, the message u201CNo entry found, 5W800u201C is issued. If I would try to create the relationship A/008 via PP02, the system issues u201CValidity period of record not within validity period of P 0000XXXX, Message no. 5A039u201D.
    Can anybody please explain me whatu2019s going on?
    T770S0 is maintained in the following way:
    PLOGI ORGA X    Integration Switch: Organizational Assignment
    PLOGI PLOGI 01  Integration Plan Version / Active Plan Version
    RHINTECHECK for personell no. 0000XXXX: all 12 (time-related) records of IT0001 are wrong (error) and the report suggests:
    a. Check whether the person is marked in open processes
    --> This seems not to be the case
    b. Check your organizational assignment, either in infotype 1 or in the organizational structure in the above mentioned period.
    --> I think this is also not the problem as org unit and position (PLANS, STELL) are both empty in PA0001.
    I am new to HR-module, please explain what is missing, Thanks,
    Angie

    Hi,
    thanks for your answer. Regarding the questions:
    > How did you get the employee records into PA0001?
    The employee records were transferred from another system into my system via ALE. In the source system the records were created via an interface (I assume). In the source system OM is not used.
    > What about the emplyees that you can assign to a position? Do they have a position in PA0001?
    No, they donu2019t. All records havenu2019t a position assigned in PA0001.
    > Can you find other differences between the employees that work and the ones that don't?
    There is only one difference for the employees who donu2019t work: In PA30 on IT "org. assignment" is field personnel area two times displayed with two different values, even that it is the same field:
    On the top of the screen:             P0001-WERKS, screen number 0100.
    Section enterprise structure:     P0001-WERKS, screen number 2000.
    From PA0001-table I can see that these employees have changed their personell area in the past (in the source system). Those records were transfered into my system via ALE, too.
    > Check dates to make sure that your employee is active within the dates you try to assign him.
    The employees are active in the related period.
    Please advise. Thanks,
    Angie
    Edited by: Angie012 on Feb 14, 2011 9:48 AM

  • OM - Moving Org Unit don't change relat 002 between my Position

    Hi,
    I have a problem with my OM system,
    I have five org unit (A B C D E) everyone with one position head of own organizational unit, a b c d e.
    this is my hierarchy
    A
    (a)
         B
          (b)
              C
               (c)  
         D
          (d)
              E
               (e)
    I have this relat in HRP1001
    Org Unit     Positions
    A 002 B     a 002 b
    A 002 D     a 002 d
    B 002 C     b 002 c
    D 002 E     d 002 e
    I'm moving (with ppome transaction) org unit C with its position c, under org unit D.
    A
    (a)
         B
          (b)             
         D
          (d)
              E
               (e)
              C
               (c)
    After the moving in HRP1001, relationship between org unit has changed B 002 C (is delimited) D 002 C (is new).
    But, I don't have relationship between Position d and c (d 002 c), and relationship between position b and c (b 002 c ) is still valid!!!
    Org Unit     Positions
    A 002 B     a 002 b
    A 002 D     a 002 d
    D 002 C     b 002 c d 002 c
    D 002 E     d 002 e
    Could someone help me?
    regards
    Fede

    Hi Frederica,
    if I understand your problem correctly, I'm afraid there is a major design flaw in your OM.
    You have an Org-hierrchy with leader positions assigned to each orgunit and the "normal"positions also assigned to those orgunits. This is absolutely sufficient for the system to know, who is reporting to whom and standard reports, evaluation paths, structural auth., workflows all can be set up to work with this correctly. And this is best practise.
    BUT you also seem to be using a position hierarchy in parallel. A position hierarchy is really only meant to be a quick and chaep alternative for an Org hierarchy, if you don't want to create orgunits. There is no new information in there. It's completely redundant. And your problem is proof for why this redundancy is damaging: you get inconsitencies.
    I"ve seen this before. Whilst their might be good resons for it (I"ve never seen one), thsi is usually done by consultants, who don't understand orgmanegement or do understand that what they are doing is wrong, but rather have teh customer do double manual work with almost guaranteed inconsistencies than make an effort to properly understand struc. authorisations, reports or workflows. If you have no clue about OM, the extra position hierarchy can make some things easier.
    So, my recommendation is:
    1) check our, where the position hierarchy is used for reporting, workflow, authorisations or other things in your system
    2) replace this by the org hierarchy
    3) delete the position hierrchy (i.e. the 002 relationships between positions)

Maybe you are looking for