Post A/c entries for JIN1 or JIN2 without FBKP setting

Hi all,
I want to post value of sales tax(JIN1 OR JIN2) values at Billing(VF01) without Automatic setting of FBKP.
Means to say I want to post above values with help of assiging a/c keys (MW3 & MWS) in Sales Pricing procedure and corresponding entries in VKOA with GL Account.
But while saving Billing(VF01) system is displaying ERROR "Error in account determination: table T030K key ECOA MW3." , because I have remove GL against MW3 in FBKP and assigned in VKOA.
Pls suugest the solution/config. in detail.
Thanks in advance,
Raju

Hi
You have to maintain the above condition types in tax procedure and maintain the account keys in TAX PROCEDUR and donot maintain in PRICING PROCEDURE. Also ensure that you have maintained respective G/L account in OB40 and not in VKOA..
Regards
MBS

Similar Messages

Offsetting entry for stock posting (GBB)

Hi
I want to know the practical application( where this comes) of posting entry for 'Offsetting entry for stock posting (GBB)' It will be appreciable if explained with example
regards
B Shar

Following are the possible scenarios;
o   Offsetting entry for stock posting (GBB)
    Offsetting entries for stock postings are used in Inventory
    Management. They are dependent on the account grouping to which each
    movement type is assigned. The following account groupings are
    defined in the standard system:
    -   AUA:     for order settlement
    -   AUF:     for goods receipts for orders (without account
        assignment)
             and for order settlement if AUA is not maintained
    -   AUI:     Subsequent adjustment of actual price from cost center
        directly
             to material (with account assignment)
    -   BSA:     for initial entry of stock balances
    -   INV:     for expenditure/income from inventory differences
    -   VAX:     for goods issues for sales orders without
             account assignment object (the account is not a cost
        element)
    -   VAY:     for goods issues for sales orders with
             account assignment object (account is a cost element)
    -   VBO:     for consumption from stock of material provided to
        vendor
    -   VBR:     for internal goods issues (for example, for cost
        center)
    -   VKA:     for sales order account assignment
             (for example, for individual purchase order)
-   VKP:     for project account assignment (for example, for
    individual PO)
-   VNG:     for scrapping/destruction
-   VQP:     for sample withdrawals without account assignment
-   VQY:     for sample withdrawals with account assignment
-   ZOB:     for goods receipts without purchase orders (mvt type
    501)
-   ZOF:     for goods receipts without production orders
         (mvt types 521 and 531)

SEM BCS - Block Posting and Data Entry

Hi Everybody,
I have a scenario to share with you:
I do not want to make any postings other that automatic roll up of P&L into rollup accounts like Retained earnings. What will be the effect If I enable the functionality "Block Posting and Data Entry" for these accounts?
Please share your views.
Thanks
RJ

According to my understanding and experience, this option is useful to refrain the local users from posting on the opening movement type => this opening position should be be calculated by the system during the carry forward only. The exception is the period of the system initialization, i-e the first closing period in BCS, where the opening MT can be impacted by anyone, on all Posting Levels.
This assumption also means that the central users (i-e users who perform the "top" consolidation activities) shall not be impacted by this option : they are thus allowed to modify this MT during cons group change activities (PL02, 12, 22) and top conso adjustements (PL30), whatever the period.

Error while posting to Tax Journal Entry for sales and use tax

Hi,
I am trying to post a journal entry (FB50) to cleanup and correct the liability on our sales and use tax. All lines are giving warnings and messages.Give me a suggestion on how to get it to post . Or if needed, another solution to correcting the balances in the sales and use taxes.
But the entry to a/c # 226530 is giving an information message but still wouldnu2019t save.
The Error message is
Enter the tax base amounts for account 226400 in company codeAFCO
Message no. F5A375
Diagnosis
You are posting directly to a tax account. Enter the tax base amounts per item using the function "Tax Amounts".
Kindly help me how to fix the above issue.
Thanks
Suvarna

You may want to check out the following notes... they may shed some light on your problem.
681930 - Posting on tax account possible w/o specific. of base amount
1090096 - FB60 / MIRO - Checking direct tax after change (F5A375)
944978 - FB60 / MIRO - check of direct tax after change

Stock is increased and FI entry is posted in statistical GR for third party

Hello
I was trying to activate the functionalty for statistical GR in third party but STUCK due to following issues. For enabling this functionaltity I have checked "Goods Reciept" and "GR Non-Valuated" check in "Delivery tab" of PO.
1. After creating Statistical GR through MIGO (101), stock has been posted in plant. I was expecting no movement in Stock .
2. I was hoping there should not be in FI posting but FI entry is posted through statistical GR .
We are using third party process from many years but without statistical GR. Requirement from client is to post statistical GR without FI entry and no stock should be updated. Please advise if anyone has idea on this.
FYI--We have item category TAS and schedule line category CS in customisation. Also advise if above two settings in PO are enought to turn ON the statistical GR functionality.
Thanks for your help.
Regards
Arvind

Thanks AKPT for reply
As advised , pleae find enclosed screens for OMS2, PO and FI entry. FI entry might be wrong as while posting MIGO ..I was getting error "WE etnry is missing in table YFTFI_SUBST236 and I maintained some dummy GL accounts.
Regards
Arvind

Unable to capture & post the bill of entry for cvd & additional duty

Dear cons
In case of Import Pos CVD and additional duty is getting inventorised and GR/IR-CVD is getting credited as the time of GR.Whereas CVD and additional duty is a cenvatable tax and should be accounted at the time of Excise posting.Also we are not able to capture and post the Bill of entry for CVD and Additional duty.

Hi..........
Pls ensure tht u hve done the configurations in Logistics General - Tax on Goods Movements.
And also ensure the u hve assigned the G/L account for CVD.
Still if u hve the prob let me know.
Regards
Durga

How to post a acquisition entry in Dep area 30 (for Non Leading ledger)

How to post a acquisition entry in Dep area 30 (for Non Leading ledger N1)
In our scenario, following configuring is being set up:
1 Book depreciation IAS/IFRS 1 0L
30 LOCAL 3 N1
51 Property Tax 0
60 DELTA 6 N1

Hi Saurabh,
Create a new custom transaction type by coping existing TTYPE 100 and restrict the transaction type which allow posting for dep.area 30 and do posting in FB01L by selecting ledger group.
Regards,
Mukthar

Offsetting Entry for Inventory Posting

Hi ,
While Working on Automatic Postings - Offsetting Entry for Inventory Posting
can any one explain me what are all General modification ,valuation modification entries made ?
What are all General Valuation Class applicable for GBB Entries & give me the G / L account details where the entries will be posted
Please give me solution on this
Thanks & Regards,
Pioneer

Refer belo link this may give some idea
http://d.yimg.com/kq/groups/54256/740187646/name/SAP_FI_MM_SD_integration_20090615.pdf

Park and Post management review step for manual journal entries

We are implementing SAP and want to discuss the best way to automate in SAP a high dollar/value (maybe $100K and above) "park and post" management review step for posting manual journal entries. I believe SAP does not offer dollar/value limits as standard functionality for defining a park & post process. If this correct, what have you seen from your other clients using SAP park & post? Is there a different way to get where we want without customizing a workflow or generating a new transaction set?

Hi you could limit the authorisation for the users only to park and then a responsible person could review it and post. You can set a tolerance limit for customers and vendors.

OBYC : Offsetting entry for stock posting (GBB) , VAX/ VAY

Dear Sapients,
Could you please tell me the difference of the account grouping VAX and VAY for GBB(Offsetting entry for stock posting)
SAP helps says:
VAX: for goods issues for sales orders without
account assignment object (the account is not a cost element)
VAY:for goods issues for sales orders with
account assignment object (account is a cost element)
But truly i still did not understand, could you pls explaing.
In my current scenario system asked me to maintain an entry for VAY, when we are trying to reverse a delivery(inter company) created for PO.
Thanks and Regards
Ravi

Dear Ravikanth
Account grouping code VAX is relevant when the sales order item does not carry costs and revenues. If the sales order item carries costs and revenues, account grouping code VAY is used.
Thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Efibootmgr & gummiboot replaced UEFI entry for Windows Boot Manager

TLDR
I am now in Windows 7 and dual boot with Arch is working fine.
But before I update Arch, I would like to understand what happened, as in why adding an efibootmgr entry for Arch replaced/deleted the Windows Boot Manager entry although I followed the BG.
The status of my UEFI boot menu was, before the installation of Arch:
Windows Boot Manager
AHCI HDJ... (hard drive 1)
AHCI ST... (hard drive 2)
While working through the BG, I decided to use gummiboot=> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Be … #Gummiboot. So:
pacman -S gummiboot
gummiboot install
pacman -S efibootmgr
gummiboot install
[some error ocurred, as mentioned in red box]
efibootmgr -c -L "Gummiboot" -l /EFI/gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi
nano /boot/loader/entries/arch.conf
title Arch Linux
linux /vmlinuz-linux
initrd /initramfs-linux.img
options root=/dev/sdb3 ro
[CTRL + X, Y, Enter]
exit
umount /mnt/{boot,home,}
reboot
I then saw a new list of the UEFI boot order:
Gummiboot
AHCI HDJ... (hard drive 1)
AHCI ST... (hard drive 2)
Chose Gummiboot and it brought up a gummiboot menu with entries
Arch Linux
Windows Boot Manager
EFI Shell something
Selected Arch Linux and it went to a message something along "boot device ' ' not found" and I was in a shell which was, I think, rootfs.
I rebooted via the button on my desktop and out the Arch Linux USB drive back. After mounting the partitions:
gummiboot remove
efibootmgr
[0000: Windows Boot Manager
[0001: Arch Linux
[0002: AHCI HDJ...
[0003: AHCI ST...
exit
umount /mnt/{boot,home,}
reboot
Now I booted into a black screen with white text which said something "Reboot and select proper Boot device"
=> Inserted Win 7 64-bit DVD, repaired the boot sector. Rebooted, saw I had these entries again:
Windows Boot Manager
AHCI HDJ... (hard drive 1)
AHCI ST... (hard drive 2)
The boot into Windows worked fine. Rebooted, chrooted into my install again and:
efibootmgr
[0000: Arch Linux
[0001: Windows Boot Manager
[0003: AHCI HDJ...
[0003: AHCI ST...
efibootmogr -b 0 -B
Then I used the EFISTUB method:
efibootmgr -c -L "Arch Linux" -l /vmlinuz-linux -u "root=/dev/sdb3 ro initrd=/initramfs-linux.img"
efibootmgr
[0000: Windows Boot Manager
[0001: Arch Linux
[0002: AHCI HDJ...
[0003: AHCI ST...
exit
umount /mnt/{boot,home,}
reboot
On reboot, 'Windows Boot Manager' was again replaced by 'Arch Linux'.
=> Inserted Win 7 64-bit DVD, repaired the boot sector.
Rebooted, I have now Windows Boot Manager + Arch Linux and dual boot works now.
My questions:
What is going on with efibootmgr replacing/deleting the Windows entry? Is there something wrong with my UEFI menu?
In connection with 1., I would like to sync the EFISTUB Kernel (wiki entry) before I run pacman -Syu. Can I do that now?
Can I uninstall gummiboot now?
Last edited by jones (2013-07-11 12:30:55)

henrik wrote:So in light of your post, I decided to ditch EFISTUB + gummiboot and try out GRUB. Thanks for clearing it up a bit. Which is what confuses me a great deal more, as GRUB/gummiboot obviously do not meddle with Microsoft's EFI files. Right?
EFI relies on two things to boot:
Boot loader program files on the ESP (or occasionally elsewhere).
NVRAM entries pointing to the boot loader files.
Your own problems seem to be with the NVRAM entries, not with the boot loader files themselves. Unfortunately, managing those NVRAM entries has proven to be problematic because of bugs in specific EFI implementations, bugs in efibootmgr and other tools that manipulate the NVRAM entries, poor documentation, and other factors.
To answer your question, though, no boot loader should mess with another's files. Such things can happen, though. The number of bugs that cause Microsoft's boot loader (EFI/Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi) to be treated deferentially have provoked some tools to use it as a target location for other boot loaders. (Ubuntu's Boot Repair tool does this in a rather overzealous way. So does my own rEFInd installer script, but only under certain narrow circumstances.) Also, the EFI/BOOT/bootx64.efi file is a special case; it's the fallback bootloader that's used when NVRAM entries are missing or don't work, and various boot loader installation procedures place copies in that location, so it can be overwritten and could contain just about anything.
However, the whole thing happened again with GRUB. So I did the whole "repairing Boot problems" with the Windows DVD rescue thingy again and deleted all non-Microsoft files from the EFI partition, /dev/sda1.
Then I formatted / (root) and installed arch again and followed the Beginners' Guide which suggest mounting /dev/sda1/ to /mnt/boot (in contrast to the GRUB entry where the ESP should be mounted to /mnt/boot/efi).
I strongly advise against doing a complete re-installation just to overcome a boot loader problem. Instead, figure out what the problem is and fix it. Doing a complete re-installation is not likely to fix anything, and depending on precisely how you do it, you could end up with a more complex problem. The reason is that the re-installation is not likely to erase the NVRAM entries from the old installation, so you could find that you've got additional stray NVRAM entries. If you do happen to fix the problem by re-installing (say, because you selected a different installation option), you're not likely to know what changed to fix the problem, so you could end up in the same boat should you need to re-install again in the future.
But it did not show this line
Found Windows 7 (loader) on /dev/sda1
... how come??
I've given up trying to understand GRUB's configuration scripts. You could try creating an entry manually by editing /etc/grub.d/40_custom; or you could forget about using the GRUB scripts and create a hand-crafted grub.cfg; or you could forget about using GRUB at all. I'm not a fan of GRUB, so my personal choice is the final one.
So for all the headache and time ... should I delete the EFI partition and recreate it maybe? I think it's possible using the Windows 7 DVD.
But somehow using efibootmgr on my UEFI list somehow invalidated the Windows entry.
Reviewing your posts, it seems that you want to use the EFI stub loader directly, but you're having problems with that because when you add it to the NVRAM entries, Windows drops off your boot manager's boot options. The obvious solution to this problem is to forget about adding the EFI stub loader directly to the NVRAM entries, and instead add a boot manager that can handle either a Linux kernel or the Windows boot loader. (IMHO, this is the superior solution anyhow; I disagree with the Arch wiki's emphasis on using the EFI stub loader "raw.") It seems you were trying to do this with GRUB but had problems booting Windows. Earlier you tried gummiboot but had problems booting Linux. My suggestion is to either go back to gummiboot and fix its problem or try rEFInd. The "device not found" error you reported with gummiboot is usually caused by either a missing (or incorrectly-specified) initrd file or by an incorrectly-specified "root=" option passed to the kernel. Check those possitilities, and if you need help, report what happens in more detail. If necessary, take a digital photo of the screen and post it here. (Make sure it's legible, though!)
You can try rEFInd with minimal disk by using a CD-R or USB flash drive image. Boot with that and your NVRAM and ESP won't be affected at all. If you can get rEFInd working from the flash drive, you can then install it to your hard disk and it should continue working. Note that you probably won't be able to boot Linux directly from rEFInd with your current configuration without adding a "root=" specification to the kernel command line. You can do this by hitting F2 or Insert twice rather than launching Linux by pressing Enter. Alternatively, you can create a refind_linux.conf file in the directory that holds your kernel. That file's contents are described in the rEFInd documentation.

Accounting Entry for Depot Excise Invoice

Hi Gurus
We make a STO from factory to depot. I have posted the depot excise invoice via J1IJ but Im unable to see the accounting entry for the excise invoice..
Im able to see the acounting entry for excise invoice for factory sales thru J1IIN..
Pls advise
Rgds..Vinz

Hi Vinz,
I would like to explore more for ur info.
When u create Excise invoice at Factory Using J1iin, accounting entries flow to the system. When u transfer it to Depot, u credit the Excise amount using MIRO and post it to RG23D ( Depot Register)
The value of the excise for which u have taken credit from ur factory would be passed on to customer now.
If you notice carefully, when u take credit of Excise entry in RG23d No accounting entry flows in the system, only value & qty gets updated to Register.
Generally, while deciding the selling price from depot u consider Basic price + Excise duty. since u are passing on the excise benefit to customer, using proforma excise invoice (transaction J1IJ)
So there is no wuestion of accounting entries.
Hey CIN Gurus.. correct me if i am haveing any misconcepts regarding this.
Hope this is clear to you now..
Reward if helpful..

Excise Tab not appearing in MIGO Screen but getting posted with EI Entry

Hi ,
I am excuting CIN ......While doing MIGO, Excise tab is not apearing nowhere in the MIGO screen but entries are being created successfuly in MIRO and posted as well, Entries ....
                                                       GR/IR Clearing A/c Dr
                                                       RG 23 BED A/c      Dr
                                                       RG 23 Ecess A/c Dr
                                                       RG 23 SHEcess A/c Dr
                                                       Vendor A/c Cr
Can any one help me and provide solution for this.
Thanks
Sukant

HI,
Check your excise group settings, in it check migo settings.
You need to mark tick in all boxes
EI capture
Post EI in MIGO
Duty differenc at GR
EI create/RG23D selection
Update RG1at MIGO
Also check in J1ID trax for the Po material chapter id is maintained.
Regards
KK

How to make entry for transit loss in the system

Hello to all,
I am having an issue with one subCon material.
Suppose,
Material A is the product required of 3000 MT Qty.
SubCon vendor have sent that qty, but there is a transit loss of 500 MT.
How to make entry for this transit loss in the system.
regards,
Anisha

correct me if i am wrong-
ur scenario is
for making material A ,
3000 MT of material B required.
but for producing A vendor uses 3500MT of B
solution : if this ia the case then u can overwrite the value of B at GRN from 3000MT to 3500MT.
OR
ur scenario is -
u require material A of 3000MT
vendor sends u 3000MT
but actualy u recieve 2500MT
and u have to pay for 3000MT as per bill
solution : if this is ur scenario then.
prerequisite-activate direct posting to G/L and material at MIRO
Path - SPRO->MM->LIV->activate direct posting to G/L and material at MIRO.
now procedure is -
step 1) do GR for 2500MT
step2) in LIV pay to vendor for 3000MT for that put 500 qty in material tab and the relavent amount.
in this way loss in transite will be book on inventory.
regards,
sujit

Posting of accounting entry related to Fixed assets

Dear All,
I have an issue as below:
We have implemented ECC 5.00 in oct,06. As part of implementation, asset management also has been implemented.
We have uploaded the asset values properly. At the same time we have posted an accouting entry through OASV to update the GL account balance.
It was observed that Fixed account and accumlated depreciation account has been posted with higher amount.
Value of the assets as per register 100,000
Less Accumulated dep.,                   10,000
Net value as per asset register          90,000
At the same time GL account balance has been posted as below
GL Account(cost of asset) :150,000
Less accumulated dep a/c     60,000
Net value as per B/s              90,000
When we compare asset register and GL balance, we could not find any difference as both are showing 90,000 only.
But when we compare cost of asset account(as per b/s) with value of the asset as per asset register we can found difference amount of 50,000.(150000-100000)
Same situation for Accumulated depreciation also. 50,000 has been posted excessivly.(60000-10000)
Now can some one tell me how to adjust the difference between asset register and b/s.
Is there any way we can get the individual balance sheet accounts to mirror the fixed asset register.
Can i post any adjustment entry through OASV as below
Accumulated dep account dr 50,000
cost of asset a/c                  50,000
Is it suggestble to post an account entry in 2006 as above.
Also let me know is there any side effects?
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Prasad

You can post this entry. This makes your recon perfect. However, it may not be advisable to post in 2006. Please find out from your finance users and try to post in the beginning of 2008, since 2007 must also be closed by now

Post A/c entries for JIN1 or JIN2 without FBKP setting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for