Post Transaction Notice
Hello guys,
I have just probed the new SBO_SP_PostTransactionNotice functionality which comes with SBO 2007A version (or SBO 2005 A EhP 2).
It is very useful, if you want to build advanced functionalities, for instance calling an external program which will add transactions in the system (using DI API or DI Server). This is not possible with SBO_SP_TransactionNotification as you will conflict with SBO inner work (system transaction which is not yet commited/rollbacked)
Unfortunately, I have noticed that it is not possible to run simple queries (SELECT) in SBO_SP_PostTransactionNotice as we can do with SBO_SP_TransactionNotice. This is a pity as this is so handy! I was wondering why is this forbidden (as I can't see how doing it could be a possible threat to the system).
Has anybody found a way around this limitation?
Regards,
Cyril
Dear Cyril,
The documentation regarding the SBO_SP_TransactionNotification procedure
can be found in the following link:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e991e2b9-0901-0010-0395-ef5268b00aaf
It is also possible to download documentation regarding the DI Event
Service, a .NET library that leverages on SBO_SP_TN and provides an
easier and safer way of getting notified on changes in the Database. It
can be found in:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/53cefa6a-0a01-0010-cd8e-e7c189cb6519
Regards
Arshdeep
Similar Messages
-
Maintain number range interval 01 for posting change notices
Hi,
I am doing transfer posting using movement type 321 (quality to unrestricted) for one material.While posting i am getting error"Maintain number range interval 01 for posting change notices" Message no. L0015
WM is active for this material and doing this movement for one plant which is newly created in system.Wil you please advice for which document type i had to maintain number range.Please inform SPRO path / Transaction to be used to make required changes.
Thanks & Regards
AtharvaMaintain number range for posting change in tcode OMLW
-
The relevant posting transaction can be found in Table T030A.
Dear friends,
In BSX, i hav maintained in following way
Valuation Modif: 0001
Valuation Class: 4011
GL acct: 22401100
& In WRX, following way i hav maintained
Valuation Modif: 0001
Valuation Class: 4011
GL acct: 18729001 dr &cr
Then also im getting error while doing MIGO...
Account determination for entry NIF6 BSX ____ ___ 4011 not possible
Message no. M8147
Diagnosis
The system did not find an account for this transaction. This means that the account determination for key NIF6 BSX ____ ___ 4011 is not maintained in MM Customizing (Valuation). The key is made up of:
Chart of account
Transaction key (= Posting transaction)
Valuation grouping code
Account grouping code
Valuation class
System Response
The system cannot update a G/L account for this transaction. You cannot post the transaction.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
If you have the authorization, check the Account determination in Customizing for Valuation.
Proceed
Note
The relevant posting transaction can be found in Table T030A.
Pls help
regards
nitinDear friends,
Assign the valuation group to the company code, then it worked but again another error came..
Account determination for entry NIF6 EIN not possible
Message no. M8147
Diagnosis
The system did not find an account for this transaction. This means that the account determination for key NIF6 EIN is not maintained in MM Customizing (Valuation). The key is made up of:
Chart of account
Transaction key (= Posting transaction)
Valuation grouping code
Account grouping code
Valuation class
System Response
The system cannot update a G/L account for this transaction. You cannot post the transaction.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
If you have the authorization, check the Account determination in Customizing for Valuation.
Proceed
Note
The relevant posting transaction can be found in Table T030A. -
How to clear open posting change notices (Movt type 309)
Hi,
I want to clear the open PCN's created with mov type 309 (Posting change, general) being shown in LL01.
All these posting change quantity are positive. I am not able to nullify them because there is no stock of those materials.
Whenever I try to create a TO from LU04, the system is unable to take a storage type because of no stock.
Whenever I try to change the PCN;s status to :U", the system says that the souce data and dest data is same (both sloc's are same).
Please suggest an alternative to clear these PCN's.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
GauravHi,
Pls check the below.
-Any open transfer orders for the posting change notice exists,once they confirmed the PCN will be cleared.
-Use LU02 to set a deletion status on the PCN.
Posting change notices can be created for same sloc's but the stock category of the source and destination will be different i.e. unretstirced to quality, unrestriced to blocked etc ....
Hope this helps you.
Rgds,
Kris. -
Error in CJ88 Posting transaction is not possible (value date not allowed)
When i try CJ88 with a wbs element, it shows the following error :
Posting transaction is not possible (value date not allowed)
Message no. AA 478
Diagnosis
A retirement was already posted on the asset 000022400733 0041 on 20091231. Based on the value date 20091231 of the transaction, this transaction should have been included in the calculation of values for the retirement.
System Response
The transaction is rejected.
Procedure
Check the value date of the transaction.
In need to put year 2009 in date of the transaction, but it isnt posible. ¿Why? I dont know very much about asset accounting...Hi
It is not allowing for WBS element final settlement, because of your asset already retairement was done.
By best suggetion is, You will create the new WBS element and transfer the all cost line items from old WBS element to new WBS element, then you will try to settlement for another asset in CJ88.
I hope it will use for you.
Regards
PVCPVC -
Clearing posting change notices
Hi All,
I'm trying to close out posting change notices manually by marking the status as U through LU02. Not able to create TO and clear this as the stock is no longer available and these are very old ones.
The problem is that the source and destination data are the same and its throwing an error.
Can you suggest any ways to clear these open posting changes
Regards,
AshwinSap provided corrrection program to clear the posting change notices.Develop this program in your system then check.We are using 4.6c version.
To set the posting change in question to processed (U), please
implement the following correction program in your system.
1) Create program 'ZLTEST00' with type '1' and application 'L' with the
following code:
report zltest00.
tables: lubu.
parameters: w-no like lubu-lgnum, "warehouse number
post-no like lubu-ubnum, "posting change notice
status like lubu-statu, "status
update. "update
select single * from lubu where lgnum = w-no
and ubnum = post-no.
write: / lubu-lgnum,
lubu-ubnum,
'Status old >', lubu-statu,
'Status new >', status.
if update ne space.
update lubu set statu = status
where lgnum = w-no
and ubnum = post-no.
if sy-subrc = 0.
write: / 'Update posting change notice'.
else.
write: / 'No update posting change notice'.
endif.
else.
write: / 'No update posting change notice'.
endif.
To run above correction program:
1) You have to indicate warehouse number, posting change number and the
status which you want to set in the posting change.
2) Without including the UPDATE-parameter, the program only shows the
posting change, or
3) When you mark the parameter UPDATE then the posting change will be
changed. -
ABUMN-error "Posting transaction is not possible (Value date not allowed)"
Hi,
When we are trying to transfer asset within company code thru Tcode ABUMN, we are getting a error as
"Posting transaction is not possible (Value date not allowed)"
What actually we are doing is we are trying to transfer the previous year asset for example say 01.04.2007 assets on today.
the Parameters are as below
Document date :26.03.2008
Posting Date :26.03.2008
Asset value date is 01.04.2007.
Then the system is throwing an error and not alloing to post the previous year transfers.
Can any one help me out.
Cheers
SriHi,
I think, if you give old asset value date, system will give you the error. This may be because, you are trying to transfer the assets with old values, means in your examble the dep. from the 01.04.2007 to 29.02.2008 whould have been charged.
So, give the current year date means any date from 01.01.2008 to till date.
If you read F1 help for the value date column, it states,
Asset value date
The asset value date is the value date for Asset Accounting. It can deviate from the posting and document date and be in posting periods already closed for Financial Accounting. However, the posting year and asset value date year must be the same.
Since the asset value date can have a direct influence on the amount of depreciation, the system creates a default value when it can. You can specify in Customizing how the the default asset value date is determined by the system.
Hope it helps
Saravanan.A -
Hi,
I need to understand how SAP posts transactions (posting logic) that ultimately end up in the trial balance (FMUSFGA table). I figure developers will probably know this.
I need to know the fields (and tables) that together govern how SAP posts transactions. If there are transactions that are used to configure automatic posting processes to the G/L in SAP, I need to know the transaction codes. If there is a process document that describes this in detail, could someone send it to me? << Personal information removed >>.
Thanks,
Kevin
Moderator message - Cross post locked
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Dec 2, 2009 9:44 AMAn update function module has been called for posting the document, it is POST_DOCUMENT
Mode of the update is synchronous
program name : SAPMF05A
Include name : MF05AFF0_FCODE_BEARBEITUNG
if you analyze the source code in the Function Module POST_DOCUMENT, append statements are being used for updating the database.
Edited by: jeevitha krishnaraj on Mar 23, 2010 12:24 PM -
HT1491 Why Does it Take Several Business Days to Post Transactions to my Account?
Please repsond to the following email address:
[email protected]
This is my main email address.
I find my IPhone a little difficult to read/send emails.
I find that iTunes takes several business days to Post transactions.
The transaction shows Pending for 4+ days and on day 5, shows Posted.
I have a debit card tied to my checking account at my bank.
My bank has my funds tied-up for 5 days!
You guys don't get the money and I do not have access to those funds in the mentime.
Do you offer Apple Credit Cards?
Or offer a way I can use PayPal to immediately transfer funds to iTunes?
Thanks.
ScottThe time is takes a carrier to approve unlocking is totally up to that carrier. Apple has no say in the matter. A carrier has zero incentive to unlock any phone, so it's not at all uncommon for them to drag their feet.
Regards. -
Hi
process for purchased material is to have it come into Storage Location XXX. Once the usage decision is done in QA32 the materials are then transferred to the correct location as defined in material master. but They do this using MB1B 311 and they are always getting the 922 issues.
Please asssitHi
Negative stocks are there in Storage type 922 because you have transfered the material through 311 mvmt before completing the posting change.
As per process, usage decision have to be made in QA32 and stock to be transfered to Unrestricted from Quality stock in same QA32. Here system will generate one posting change notice. Transfer this Posting change in to TO and confirm the same. Then make 311 mvmt to transfer the material say for example from receiving Storage Location to Warehouse storage location
Regards
Shantha Kumar -
Error while posting transaction to Internal order
Hi
We tried to make a transactions to the internal order, having available amount and we have posted the transaction less than the available amount yet received a yellow error message that the internal order budget almost exhausted. We checked the internal order budget it transaction KO22 and our prospective booking fit to the budget. But still we were unable to post because of the internal order budget. We could only solve to increase the budget with a bigger amount so we could reprocess the file. Why is it always that the report shows budget is available but we are unable to post due to insufficient funds. Only on adding more funds we are able to post the transactions.
Which is the correct report to view the budged is available and utilized.
Regards
VenkatS_ALR_87013019
-
LU04 list of posting change notices
Hi Guys,
i am new to the LU04 tcode so maybe you can help me out.
my customer has an issue in this tcode, since 2007 he has a line that cannot be delete:
Sel Date S MTy Material 1 Plnt Batch C S Open qty UoM
29.11.2007 309 xxxxxx xxxx xxxxxxx 2.400 KG
how can i delete this line?
thanks
C.Hi
In LU02 for the posting change number set the Posting change status to 'U' and save
This will get rid of the notice
I hope that this helps
Frenchy -
Good morning,
I should do a little analysis about our G/L accounts definition for transaction key PRD. What I would like to understand is how SAP configures the automatic posting procedure or, in a better way, how SAP determines which transaction keys must be used in a particular situation.
I think that these tables should be involved in the procedure:
T156SC
T156SY
T156X
T156W
Does someone have more information?
Thank you in advance.
Francesco AlborghettiDear Francesco,
Go to T.code - OBYC.
Select the posting key - PRD.
Give the concern chart of Account and go inside.
You will see Valuation modification and Valuation class assigned to GL accounts.
If you want to include the movement types into this, you need the Account modifier. If so, click rules,
select the check box of Account modifier also and save the screen first.
Then go into the trasnaction, where you will find the Account modifier will also be included. You can select the correct account modifier which is in turn assigned with the movement type.
Hope this helps.
Reward points if satisfied.
Thanks.
Augustine Ponraj. -
Transfer Posting - Transaction MB1B
Hello Friends,
Transaction - MB1B (Enter Transfer Posting)
Movement - 303 (Transfer posting plant to plant - remove from storage)
As per above transaction and Movement description, it is very clear this movement being used for Plant to Plant transfer.
Here I am having one query, in initial screen of MB1B, inputs to be given as Movement Type 303, Plant, ABC and Storage location is 001then Enter,
In second screen, there is a Receiving Plant
Suppose we have to enter other plant (other than ABC), but by mistake (knowningly / unknowingly) even we enter same plant (ABC), system is taking and after save material document is created.
Suppose system should not create (allow to save) if issuing plant as well as Receiving plants are same.
Am I correct? If correct, Please explain how to restrict this?
If I am not correct, please explain why?
Best Regards,
Vijayakumar TVNDear Mr.Jürgen L.
I am having one query here, the meaning of transfer posting shall either within a plant (between storage locations) or plant to plant. In this case, when I am choosing 303 movement - Transfer posting plant to plant - remove from storage, it should be between two plants, obviously, system should not allow receiving plant is equal to issue plant.
Could u please clarify my understanding is correct or not?
Best Regards,
Vijayakumar TVN -
AS91 - AA660 Error when trying to post transaction data
Hi,
I am getting error AA660 when migrating assets with transactions data.
I am trying to post Acq Tx 331 (say £1000) along with Unplanned Depreciation Tx 640 (say -£80).
The error implies that I have a negative NBV in all depreciation areas, even though the NBV is positive (i.e. £1000-£80).
I can circumvent the problem by setting the Negative Val Flag in each Depreciation Area for the asset, but I have a big volume of assets and this should not be happening.
Can anyone help?
Regards
DerekCheck the following notes
1) Note 723399 - Invest. support deprec./reval. area: Field XNEGA copied
2) Note 1025126 - Correct error messages from new depreciation calculation
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi
Maybe you are looking for
-
Colors look different in browser window than in InDesign or Photoshop
So, the colors look quite different (brighter) on Kuler (in my Firefox browser window), than when I download or copy the CMYK numbers exactly over to InDesign or Photoshop. In Kuler, the colors are significantly brighter and more saturated than how t
-
Finder doesn't like showing one of my external hard disks
I have seen a few threads about on the internet relating to this but no permanent solution. I recently bought an iomega 500gb MiniMax drive for use with my MacBook, it was working fine and showing in finder for a day or so and then stopped automatica
-
Service tax interim to final transfer
Dear all, I am facing the below error when i do the deferred tax transfer. Tax code SI for country IN has been deleted or incorrectly changed Message no. FS201 kindly do the needful. I find some one has told this issue is answered. Kindly let me know
-
Email Accounts settings is grayed out. What can I do?
Hi, The Email Accounts Settings has been grayed out. I cannot make any changes to my current email accounts, add new, or delete old email accounts. How can I ungray it?
-
New HDD, won't install from DVD - freezes
I have a MBP from 2009 and the hard drive went out last week. I managed to pull a backup off of it with DW 4.4 and my SATA-USB converter. The new drive arrived today, so I installed it (same drive I had, as recommended by OWC), and put in my 10.6 dis