Posting 100% VAT

Has any managed to post VAT/TAX through a standard GL journal and manage to get the VAT to show as deductable on the Tax Return. I am trying to find a way of claiming back VAT from purchase previously posted at full cost due to no VAT evidence. Two problems I am having are, getting the amount to show as deductable and getting a journal to allow a posting with 100% VAT with a zero posting to the expense or tax account. E.G.
AB
40 to expense with tax code 100% VX at 17.50
50 to expense at 17.50
or
AB
50 to expense at 17.50
40 to tax account with zero value and 17.50 tax value
Neither option work.

Hello Adam,
We had the same problem and also didn't find a solution for it in SAP.
We now use a work around for this situation. We don't use a tax code in the posting and post it manually to the G/L tax account.
For reporting, we have to keep this account in mind everytime the tax return (RFUMSV00) is executed.
Regards,
Johan

Similar Messages

  • Posting multiple VAT lines through BAPI

    At my customer we are importing vendor invoices from a third party system into SAP. For this we use BAPI "BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE1"
    The third party system also calculates the TAX amounts. Therefore, we need to be able to post multiple VAT lines for one invoice line item. This has to do with the fact that we have deductible and non deductible taxes. To do this we would like to use the TAXDATA Table from the BAPI. However, when we post multiple lines here for one Tax Code, we get an error for duplicates in RBTX.
    Has anyone ever dealt with this problem before? How can we post multiple tax lines for a single invoice tax line, either using the above BAPI or using a workaround. I do have to mention that using the BAPI for the initial posting is needed since we have to do with certain Dutch legislation that can only be handled using this BAPI.
    Regards,
    Sjaak van den Berg

    I guess u need to add
    POSCHEDULEX-PO_ITEMX = X.
    before appending the table Parameter POSCHEDULEX
    One for each append statement on table internal table POSCHEDULEX
    Regards
    Alok Pathak

  • How to post 100 records from R3 to file in XI

    Hi,
       Can any one explain me how to post 100 from R3 using RFC sender adapter to flat file.
    thanks
    dhanush.

    hi
    Follow this link it is helpfull to you.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/advancedsearch?query=howtopost100fromR3usingRFCsenderadaptertoflatfile&cat=sdn_all
    IDOC/EDI/ALE
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e698aa90-0201-0010-7982-b498e02af76b
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/18dfe590-0201-0010-6b8b-d21dfa9929c9
    Regards,
    Santosh
    Message was edited by:
            Venkata Santosh Kumar Boddu

  • Posting to VAT at Good receipt stage(MIGO Stage)

    <b>We have following scenario:</b>
    At the time of goods receipt, VAT should flow to VAT interim account.
    At the time of invoice verification, the same VAT should flow to VAT receivable account.
    <b>The entries will be:</b>
    <i>For receipt:</i>
    Stock A/C           Dr   5000
    VAT Interim A/C  DR    100 
                 To GR/IR Account  5100
    <i>For Invoice Verification:</i>
    GR/IR Account         5100
    VAT Receivable A/C    100
               To Vendor A/c        5100
                To VAT Interim A/C  100
    <b>Can you please help for configuring this scenario</b>

    Hi,
    VAT a/c is not hit at the time of GR, but at the time of posting vendor invoice
    Invoice posting
    VAT a/c debit (Trans key for VAT condition type in OB40)
    Vendor a/c credit
    Rgds
    sunfico

  • How to post 100 records from R3 to JDBC

    Hi,
      I want to post the 100 records from R3 to XI using RFC adapter synchronously, from xi to JDBC synchronously. how can we implement this scenario.
    thanks.

    Hi,
    See this link,
    Here is an example of mapping for synch JDBC.
    /people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/09/16/xi-how-to-on-jdbc-receiver-response
    /people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/05/21/jdbc-stored-procedures
    Also go thru these links:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/2e/96fd3f2d14e869e10000000a155106/content.htm
    /people/alessandro.berta/blog/2005/10/04/save-time-with-generalized-jdbc-datatypes
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/4d/8c103e05df2e4b95cbcc68fed61705/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Akshay Jamgaonkar.
    Reward points if find useful.
    null

  • Wrong GL posting to VAT condition

    Hi Gurus
    Recently we had defined new posting Key  and the same was assigned to VAT condition in Pricing proceedure and necessary new GL accounts assigned in OBYC
    Still the postings were getting posted to old GL account only
    Can any one help where I had gone wrong?
    Thanks in advance
    SAS

    Hi VB,
    Can you check if your material is having the coreect Valuation Class assigned.
    In OBYC can you again cross check if the Valuation Class in pointing to your new VAT
    Automatic G/L account determination is evaluated as follows, Initially system check for the Chart of Accounts at which the corresponding G/L accounts are maintained, then system check for the corresponding Valuation area and for valuation grouping code if any.
    Once system determines the valuation area, it checks for valuation class through material type and account category reference. After identifying the valuation class, system check for the business transaction and hence for its value string. Exclusively for GBB, PRD and KON system check for account modifiers and then to postings keys. There by system posts to corresponding G/L accounts.
    Please check on the above logic lines
    thx,
    MJ

  • Switzerland 100% VAT

    Hello,
    Our local subsidiary in Switzerland is telling us the way VAT
    calculation is done in SAP isn't working well according to Swiss law
    for a particular case : When the custom administration is invoicing
    VAT, they should not be able to book directly on VAT account despite
    the fact that the final booking is Vendor to Vat.
    Do you have any idea about it ?
    Many thanks in advance,
    Michel.

    Hi Micheal
    What do you do in the end to solve this issue.
    Best regards, Leo

  • In an accounting entry vat line should post with different exchange rate how to do that.

    In specific jurisdictions invoices in foreign currency should also show
    exchange rate and translated VAT amount in local currency. The required
    exchange rate may change by country, although often the central bank
    rate is required to post the VAT amount. and  BASE AMT to be posted in  'M'(MOR) rate
    So base amount and vat amount will be converted with 2 different
    exchange rate types respectively.
    below accounting entry should generate.
                                                GBP        EUR    
    DR CUst                              100          111.11          0.9 MOR
    Cr   Revenue                          90          100               0.9 MOR  
    Cr   VAT                                10          12.50            0.8 ECB 
    Dr   Exchange rate diff                          1.39
    how should we proceed to develop the solution for this.
    Thanks
    kartik

    In specific jurisdictions invoices in foreign currency should also show
    exchange rate and translated VAT amount in local currency. The required
    exchange rate may change by country, although often the central bank
    rate is required to post the VAT amount. and  BASE AMT to be posted in  'M'(MOR) rate
    So base amount and vat amount will be converted with 2 different
    exchange rate types respectively.
    below accounting entry should generate.
                                                GBP        EUR    
    DR CUst                              100          111.11          0.9 MOR
    Cr   Revenue                          90          100               0.9 MOR  
    Cr   VAT                                10          12.50            0.8 ECB 
    Dr   Exchange rate diff                          1.39
    how should we proceed to develop the solution for this.
    Thanks
    kartik

  • VAT should post based on PO date or GR date not based on MIRO posting date

    Hi,
    Based on posting date in Invoice(MIRO) & condition record validity period, VAT is calculated & posting on invoice posting.
    Condition record for VAT condition type with tax code(T9):
    01.01.2011 to 31.01.2011-------> 4%
    01.02.2011 to 28.02.2011------->12%
    01.03.2011 to 31.03.2011------->14.5%
    PO created and GR done on February & invoive done on March and syatem calculated VAT amount perfactly based on validity period maintained in condition recod and invoice posted.
    But requirement is  system should post invoice VAT amount as mentioned in the PO ( based on PO date) or GR date to post during Invoice posting in MIRO
    Regards,
    Biju K

    Hi,
    Any other input?
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Posting VAT only invoices

    Hi Experts,
    Please help me post VAT only invoices.
    I would like to post the invoices only with VAT amount and to see the same in VAT report.
    Can anybody has come across these type of situations, if then please help me.
    Regards

    Dear Eric,
    Actually I need to post the VAT only invoice containing only VAT amount, say at the time of actual invoice posting by mistake less VAT has been charged, now the balance VAT amount needs to be posted.
    How can we post and it should be reflected in the VAT amount column in the report S_ALR_87012356 - SAP minimal variant.
    Hope you understand what exactly I want to post......
    Thanks

  • New number of posts bug(?) + question; no #100, and total # of posts vary

    New number of posts bug(?) + question; no number 100, and total number of posts vary
    Intrigued by Tuttle's new attempt to join Niel's old habit to keep his own total number of posts count, I went and start counting my posts since the New Discussions. Because I saved my latest Old Discussions Post-and-Points info, I can see what are the previously-still-online ones (the pre- 14-Nov-2005 01:31 GMT ones), and I know exactly what was my "real" total number of posts before 14-Nov-2005 (2446).
    My New Discussions posts number however, is quite uncertain.
    Firstly, when I use the "My Posts" link on the right, then clicking on and on on the "Next" link,
    my "Viewing 91-100 of 586 -- Pages" shows 91-99 instead of 91-100
    (= should show 10 posts, shows 9 posts)
    then I go on clicking Next Next Next, and I see the same missing counts happen elsewhere:
    my posts number 100, 259, 260, 370, 390, 520, 558, 559, 560, 578, 579, and 580 are missing too.
    Note that I wouldn't bother doing all this, and I would have thought it's just very old posts that are automatically deleted like in the Old Discussions,
    BUT,
    the problem is that when I choose to see all my posts together on the same page
    (by using the start=0&range=600 suffix in the URL)
    I get a total number of posts that is different (570).
    A third way to quickly see all posts without having to load too big page
    (using the start=0&range=300 suffix in the URL then only one "Next" click)
    shows yet another, different again, number of total posts (573).
    And my "official" total number of posts is (586).
    Dear HOSTS,
    - If this can be used as a bug report to fix a counting problem, glad to help.
    - If there is no bug, I have two(+) questions then:
    1) Was my post number 100 deleted?
    (should be around 27-Nov-2005 18:00 GMT)
    Also:
    I thought the Total Posts number that we see in "My Public Profile" or under the avatar in each post (586), was only the number of posts still online.
    - if it is the case, then there are no automatically deleted old posts anymore?
    - if old posts are automatically deleted like before, this number should vary?
    - if it doesn't vary (it just grows by one per new post), AND at the same time old posts are actually automatically deleted,
    it has to show the "real" total number of posts then,
    (as it is now, a total starting from the Old-Discussions-still-online-posts, it makes no sense),
    that is,
    the total posts in the New Discussions PLUS the total posts since first registration in the Old Discussions.
    So,
    2) What does it show exactly?
    Thanks again for all the great work!
    Axl
    220? 221?

    Thank you Andreas,
    Your confirmation about the "post #100 bug" does help.
    "As for your other missing posts - I guess Tuttle's assessment that they might be deleted is probably right..."
    Yes, that makes sense and that's what I'm trying to figure in my OP, but then,
    after I posted my "#221/2667 post" (11-Dec-2005 21:51 GMT), my originally missing #
    259, 260, 370, 390, 520, 558, 559, 560, 578, 579, and 580
    should have become
    260, 261, 371, 391, 521, 559, 560, 561, 579, 580, and 581
    right? (forget the #100: this one we know for sure it's a bug)
    Or if the software counts them from the first (now that would have been a good start) instead of starting from the most recent,
    they should become
    258, 259, 369, 389, 519, 557, 558, 559, 577, 578, and 579
    Well, that's not what happened. Now the missing # are
    259, 260, 370, 390, 400, 520, 559, 560, 570, 579, and 580
    (in addition to the same #100) (#558 and 578 not missing anymore).
    As you can see, there is no logic:
    It doesn't work as a simple numerotation of StillOnlinePosts, no matter the order
    (otherwise there would simply be a straight count from 1 to 575 (=587-12).
    It looks indeed like it shows which old posts are being automatically deleted. That the numbers are quite the same would simply show that the old posts dates were so close, of course they are deleted (six months later) almost at the same time,
    BUT,
    if it was the case, there would never be LESS deleted posts between two StillOnlinePosts, like it happens for example between my StillOnlinePosts #557 and #561.
    Please note: of course I stick to the same method to make all my counts. Not manually modifying the URL, just using the default Next-Next-Next- clicking...
    Modifying URL would add yet more differences in the differences!..
    Dear Hosts,
    Too bad it doesn't help looking yourself at my "My Posts", as everything changes each time I'm adding a reply somewhere.
    Perhaps a good way to troubleshoot this would be to start from a very simple basis:
    --> "name" the posts with a number, starting from the oldest.
    This way, for example my "#1" post (11-Dec-2005 21:51 GMT in this thread) would be named "221" in the New Discussions, or "2667" if you start from my Registration date.
    At the moment, it is very difficult to figure what fault comes from the "#100 post bug" and what fault comes from another possible counting bug...
    Then the New Discussions "fluctuating" refreshing delay too, possibly messes the counts...
    Thanks!
    Axl
    223/2669

  • Depreciation posting Local currency 100 SGD and Group currency MYR 20000

    hi,
    i am posting depreciation for SG01(Singapore CC).System posts 100 SGD local currency and 20000 MYR  in Group currency. I maintain currecncy rates and I checked the rates are correct.Inspite of maintaining the rates correctly.sap posting 20000k as group currency.
    Sap should post 100 SGD and 300 Group currency.why system is posting the group currency as 20000.whether any config i am missing or anything i have to maintain.
    Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Thks
    cra

    Check translation ratios between SGD and MYR in TCURF table

  • Validations for VAT GL's in FB05 for posting to authorized user

    Hi Team,
    I have a problem with post transaction FB05 with transfer posting with clearing.While make a posting with VAT GL accounts system thrown an error message with authorization issue.Its related to validation existing for VAT GL accounts.
    The authorization gave to only one user to post VAT related GL transactions.When user post a document on 31-March, its working fine.But same user post a document with same ID and same GL's. But this moment system wont accept posting due to validation. I check the validation the rules wrote as,
    Pre requisites
    BSEG-HKONT IN ZVAT_ACCOUNTS  and check  SYST-UNAME IN ZVAT_USER.
    But the problem is i am not able to find the ZVAT_ACCOUNTS, SYST_UNAME and ZVAT-USER.Its not a table and T codes.My Technical people put a break point and tried to find out.But we did not find anything from program.
    Could please anybody assist. Thanks in advance
    Thanks,
    Prasad.

    Hi Prasad,
    They should be set. You can check it with GS03.
    Thanks,
    Yan

  • VAT amount to be posted in GBP currency during MIRO UK legal requirement

    hello,
    Our UK Company code has EUR as Currency key. This means that for this company code, the local currency is EUR. If it receives and pays invoices in EUR it has also to post the VAT amount in GBP shown by the vendor on his invoice according to UK VAT regulation. We need to be able to set the rate per invoice and not using the automatic one in the table for a fixed rate per month.
    Indeed, the VAT guide (VAT700) makes it clear that the suppliers must show the sterling equivalents of the Net and VAT amounts on the VAT invoice. This means that the VAT amount posted will not depend on the exchange rate set up in the system.
    In few words, we need the possibility for a EUR company code which receives an invoice in EUR to be able to post the VAT in GBP according to UK legal requirements.
    The remaining problem now is to have the exchange rate field open for manual change!
    i did go through SAP notes 776105 and 739958
    can anyone help on this
    regards
    venkatprasad

    Hi,
    I think you can resolve this by working out the exchange rate used i.e. the GBP VAT amount vs the EUR amount and store that in a document field somewhere i.e. REF KEY3 or similar. Then you would need to grab the exchange rate from the document line and use that in the VAT report (Thinking user exit). The report would then reflect the GBP VAT amount as per invoice. This is not a clean solution but as you probably know the issue is due to the EUR currency being linked to a UK company code. I think in a GBP company code, the EUR invoice would open up a field for the tax exchange rate and the issue would be solved.
    Anyway, there is probably a better way of doing the above...I just have not found one yet :-).
    Thanks
    Kris

  • Reversal of VAT at the time of allowing cash discount for incoming payment.

    Hi Gurus,
    Please guide me for the following scenario.
    Invoice posted for comp code from SD. Sale value = 100 Vat = 20 (20%) Customer to Pay =120. Cash discount will be 10% if paid with in 15days.
    Invoice on 1st May 2011
    Entry At invoice
    Customer                  DR                                                              120
    To Revenue Acct - 1000100                                                                           100
    To VAT payable Acct -2000200                                                                        20
    Customer made payment on 10th may 2011.
    The expected entry is
    Bank A/C 30000100       DR                                                         108
    Discount 40000100        DR                                                           10
    VAT Payable 2000200   DR  ((20/120)*12)                                     2
        To Customer                                                                                120
    There is acheck box at comp code global setting level (for tax and cash discount) and another at tax jurisdiction set up level.
    Is there any other set up is required apart from above set up for reversal of VAT at the time of incoming payment (as shown above).
    please guide me.
    Pranab

    Please create a Price determination schema/ Modify existing schema to calculate (subtract) Cash Discount in Nett Price and not on Gross Price.
    Assign the CAsh discount Z condition to the schema.
    You can use this in either header or item level depending upon your requirement.
    This is to be maintained in condition table MEK1

Maybe you are looking for