Posting subsequent debits/credits for ERS items
All,
In an effort to stop manual invoices from being created for ERS items, I've tested the OMRM configuration of message M8 225.
In my testing if this message is set to an ERROR - subsequent debits/credits cannot be posted against the line item. It will allow the subsequent debit/credit if it is set to a WARNING.
Is there another way to manage subsequent debits/credits for ERS items that may have been incorrectly priced at the time of GR so that I can keep message M8 225 as an ERROR?
Thanks
Sandra
The solution we will go with on this is to make the message M8 225 an information message which forces a pop-up window when the user tries to enter the invoice. A pop-up window does not prevent an invoice from being posted but it is better than what it was and we can post subsequent debits/credits.
Similar Messages
-
Value Credits for Stock Items - is this a viable solution? (Drop Ship Whs)
Hi all
I seem to have a solution for a long standing problem and have tested it but not tried it for real so was interested in your comments. It uses a drop ship warehouse to achieve the result but I donu2019t want to implement on site if it might also be doing things that I am unaware of. It all started off with some testing of drop ship warehouses, which I think is pretty poor functionality in B1, extract from my report below:
"The disadvantages of SAP drop ship functionality all centre around the fact that it does not generate stock movements. You lose audit trail and some reports that users may rely on eg stock usage. Also because there is no stock movement the item cost is not updated (ave or FIFO). This also means that you do not get a cost of sale on the sales order or invoice, if you have set the GP Base Price to item cost, and no COS in sales analysis. The sales invoice journal generated also does not post COS, just sales, but note that as there is still no stock transaction it can be invoiced before the PO receipt or invoice. And as the purchase receipt does not generate a stock transaction there is no journal and therefore no accrual (GRNI). The AP invoice just posts an expense to P&L but only when the supplier invoice is received. So it screws stock movements, item cost, sales analysis, P&L, BS accruals and there is little in the way of control."
However, this set me thinking about using it for value credits, report extract as below:
I realised whilst I was testing that the drop ship warehouse could be used very effectively to deliver a solution for something that has caused me much grief over the years. When you use the drop ship warehouse stock movements are never generated. Consider a customer who has been overcharged for goods and requires a credit. Historically, the advice has always been to issue a u201Cserviceu201D credit against a GL code because an u201Citemu201D credit document would book stock back into the warehouse and reduce the reported quantity of goods sold, which is not required. The downside of the service credit is that whilst GL postings may be OK sales analysis is now incorrect. But using a drop ship warehouse on the credit note line we get a document against the itemcode, stock is not updated and the credit value does appear in sales analysis as well as GL. Perfect! So we could create a warehouse, marked as a drop ship warehouse but clearly labelled as u201CVALUE CREDITS ONLYu201D, to be used for this purpose
What does anybody think about this solution - are there any downsides?
Thanks
BruceHi Bruce,
Your understanding of Drop Ship is mostly correct. The proposal sounds good. The main point of the Drop Ship function would be no stock involved. You really do not need to label it is bad or poor. It is only useful for people who need it. If you could utilize the function for your goal, go for it.
Thanks,
Gordon -
Hi friend,
i am having a problem while posting the excise invoice for imported item.
previously the entry was correct. and cenvat clearing account (CVD) (2401009) was being picked up at the time of J1iex .
then somebody interfered in the system and change d to other G/l (2401004). as a result last month all entry went wrong in other G/l.
again i corrected the settings for ETT-GRPO and Subtran type IP. again system is picking the same G/l 2401004.
can any body tell me any reason for that, or some other ETT is responsible for that.Hello,
Check CVD G/L account in Company code settings and the same G/L account is available in "G/L accounts per excise transaction"
Here if you set the correct G/L account then system will take correct G/L account while J1IEX if subtransaction type IP
Regards
Mahesh Naik -
I just noticed that my account has been debited for equivalent of usd99.99 for an item Gizmonauts, overflowing chest of crystals, the seller is backflip studios. whats this item all about? how can i get a refund?
dougiedc wrote:
It boggles the mind. The Verizon store on L Street downtown Washington, D.C. cannot access my Verizon account. They can only sell cellphones then it's up to me to contact Verizon on my own to get the hook up. I even asked "Are you Verizon employes? Is this a vendor store or is it really a Verizon owned and operated store?" The answer "Yes, we are Verizon employes, yes this is a Verizon owned and operated store" ...
Yes, it indeed boggles the mind. I'm of course referring to the fact that your post concerns Verizon Wireless products and services. This forum is dedicated exclusively to Verizon Communications services. As you probably know, Verizon Wireless and Verizon Communications operate as separate companies.
If you need help for a Verizon wireless product or service, it's best to direct questions to the Verizon Wireless forums. You can reach them by clicking on "Wireless" (either here or at the top of the page).
Good luck and I sincerely hope you get your issue resolved. -
Cancellation of ERS Invoice for return Items
Hi all,
How to cancel the ERS Invoice for Return Item POs?
For normal items, we used to post a GR with 122 movement type and run the MRRL. But for Return Item POs we are unable to do that. Is there any other way?
Rgds, MallikPlease see the below help from SAP
The system determines the invoice amount for this ordering transaction from the prices entered in the order, the terms of payment, the tax information and the delivery quantity entered in the goods receipt.
Credit memos can also be created using ERS: if an invoice has already been posted for a goods receipt and goods have since been returned, the system automatically generates a credit memo for the returned quantity during the next ERS run. -
No control line for line item - error while posting bd to accounting
Hi all,
Billing document showing err "no control line for line item" while posting to accounting doc.Sales document is complete no in completion logs.
Previous errr: g/l missing for line item" in order incompletion after maintaining company code for customer, then refresh the g/l missing for line item is no more logs and showing the error "no control line for line item" while posting bd to accts.
Please help
Regards
anushHello Anush,
if the company data of the payer was not created when the sales order has been created, then the system could not create the correct records in table VBREVK. Once the company data has been maintained the VBREVK records could be corrected by re-saving the sales, but only if no billing document exists.
In your case you already created the billing document.
Please try these step:
1. reverse billing document
2. run VA02 add a blank char to PO number, save
3. create new billing document
Best regards,
Ivano. -
Report for Posting Rule details for Functions/items
Hello
Is there a standard program in SAP to take a report or listing of extract in MS Excel of the posting rule details configuration settings in SAP-JVA. I am fairly certain there is a program to extract the details in Excel but I am not sure what is the name of that program and how to use it. I appreciate any ABAP programmer or expert can guide me how to go about this listing.
ThanksHi Raghavendra,
In order to do postings in JVA, we create posting methods and under that Posting method we have to create and configure posting rules. Under the posting method, there are SAP JVA processes or functions and function items that are used to create the posting rules. The posting rules details are specified for each function and function item combination and involve the specification of Recovery indicator along with posting keys, SE indicator and billing indicator.
I am not convinced that the standard codes in my system for posting keys, recovery indicators and billing indicators are exactly the same as the default settings and I need to check it along with the posting rule details.
Please see the screenshots attached to give you an idea. I am looking for an ABAP program or report program to take out a listing of these posting rules details from the system.
Spro - JVA - Posting rules fig 0
Posting method / Posting rules screen - fig 1
Posting rule item codes for function CCOP
Posting rule details for function/item CCOP/AC -
How to mention posting keys for line items in IDOCS for fb01 posting
Hi all ,
I am using IDOCS for fb01 posting with posting keys 15 and posting keys 40 for line items .The data is in legacy file . I am using IDOC <b>ACC_GL_POSTING_01</b> for posting . Is there any way that I can mention the posting keys in the segment parameters of the IDOC.If there is anyone who have done fb01 posting with IDOCS,please help me with the code .Please treat the question as urgent .
Thanks in advanceHi Arshad,
There is no fecility to enter Posting keys explicitly.. It is determined automaticall by the Credit/Debit amounts u enter in GL data in the segments E1BPACGL08 and E1BPACCR08 and also it depends on the Customer and Vendor no.
Sreedhar -
My user has posted invoice in FB01 For Venor but its shows as cleared items
Dear experts
My user has posted invoice in FB01 For Vendor but its shows as cleared items in G/L and Vendor line items.
can you please give your suggestion on same
Thanks and Regards
vamsi
Edited by: asuvamsi on Feb 7, 2010 1:07 PMHi,
Most possible causes for your issue..
1) Your GL account might not created with Open Item Management, even that GL account is B/S account.
2) No vendor invoice will be created as cleared items automatically, may be someone might have cleared that invoice with anohter payment document.
Please verify correctly.
Thanks,
Srinu -
I purchased a song from iTunes but it will not play in iTunes or on my nano. When I attempt to play it, a get asked for my account and pw. When these are provided, I get asked for them again. Is there a way to get my purchased song to play or get my account credited for this purchase?
ThanksWhich os are you using on your computer?
-
Posting a partial payment for customer receipts with full amount
Hi,
Is there a way by which I can post the full amount of the invoice as a partial
receipt (that is without clearing the open items but at the same time linking the invoice and the amount). If I use F-28 the system clears the line item if the partial payment amount equals the invoice amount.
The scenario here is a PDC received from the customer. I would like to post the credit to the customer account as a partial payment and debit a special GL account for PDC received. For finding out the customer ageing I shall not use the credit (as the PDC has not yet materialised). This can be done by posting the PDC entry using a different document type and excluding it from the selection criteria. At the same time customer account statements should be sent to him/her after considering the PDCs received (the assignment field will contain the invoice number and therefore can be summed). Only when the PDC is deposited and cleared do I want to clear the partial payment (if the amounts match) using the assignment field. The Cheques due on any date can be obtained from the Special GL account.
Or can anyone think of a better way to solve the issue.
1. PDCs should be credited to the customer account when it is received.
2. The users know about the invoices pertaining to the PDCs only at the time of posting the PDCs and not during the time it is deposited into the bank. Therefore the linking should be done at the receipt of PDC stage itself and not later.
3. Customer account statements have to be sent after considering the PDCs.
4. A/R information system should not consider the PDCs received to the customer account.
5. I should be able to quickly choose the cheques I want to deposit and transfer it to the Incoming Bank Account.
Any help will be appreciated with points (and lots of them )
Rgds
Shivram.Hi
I would suggest you treat the PDC as a noted item which is only for statistical purpose. You can post the PDC cheque to the customer account through transaction code F-38 which will post as noted item in the customer account. If you want to analyse the age-wise outstanding from the customer exclude the noted item. You can enter the invoice no for which payment is received in the assignment column which will be useful for sorting purpose. If you want to know what are the cheques to be deposited for the day, you can take the same by selecting the due on date from the customer accounts using the noted item indicator. By using this indicator the credit management for the customer can also be done.
After depositing the cheque, reverse the statistical posting and make fresh posting as debiting Bank a/c and crediting customer account.
Hope it will help you to some extent.
Regards,
K Lakshmanan -
Posting Subsequent Debit via EDI(MIRO)
Hello All,
Any idea how to post the subsequent debit or credit via EDI using transaction code MIRO. We were able to post invoice/credit memo through EDI but not subsequent debit/credit.
Advance thanks for the reply.
Thanks
MPHi
Posting of subsequent debit and subsequent credit is not possible using EDI for invoice verification.
When you transmit invoice information via EDI, you
Cannot create subsequent debits
Cannot settle planned delivery costs
Cannot post with varying purchase order units of measure
Cannot post invoices for blocked purchase order items
Please check the link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/44/f50abcea3b11d194dc0000e83dd751/frameset.htm
Thanks & Regards
Kishore -
"BFOD_A" Table update (FI Subsequent BA/PC Adjustment: Customer Items)
Hi Friends,
I have posted a payment document 120001 in company code please see the below entry.
Itm PK Account Account short text Assignment Tx Amount
1 40 12519002 GL 20081117 25,330.98
2 40 12519002 GL 20081117 1,225,915.04
3 40 12519002 GL 20081117 9,417.00
4 50 12519002 GL 20081117 -2,541.67
5 4 1072698 Customer CC REFUND 3,060.00
6 40 12519002 GL 20081117 1,354.97
7 17 1000368 Customer -4,933.66
8 17 1005152 Customer -512.26
9 17 1024054 Customer -3,971.08
10 50 10703001 GL 14007930912008.00 1,251,764.35
11 50 10703002 GL 14007930912008.00 -1,354.97
but the same documet updated in table BFOD_A (FI Subsequent BA/PC Adjustment: Customer Items) with diffrent values in customer.
for example 1072698 customer accounted was debited with document value :3060.00
but in the BFOD_A table updated with debit( 606260.43)and credit (603260.43) with diffrent values but the balance was document value (3060.00) .
1072698 120001 doc value -
3060.00
1076698 120001 Doc value in BFOD_A : Dr : 606260.43
1076698 120001 Doc value in BFOD_A : Cr : 603260.43
The BFOD_A table Dr and cr vaue equl to document value : 3060.00 ( 606260.43 - 603260.43)
Can you please let me know how this table BFOD_A (FI Subsequent BA/PC Adjustment: Customer Items) updating with debit and credit diffrent values not the document value. the debit and credit variation is original document value.
Please explain on this, i will assign full points to you.
BFOD_A table updated with below detail for same document with diffrent values in customer accounts.
CoCd DocumentNo Year Itm BknIm G/L Customer D/C Amount LC
100 120001 2008 5 1 12501000 1072698 S 606,260.43
100 120001 2008 5 2 12501000 1072698 H 603,200.43
100 120001 2008 7 1 12501000 1000368 H 977,478.05
100 120001 2008 7 2 12501000 1000368 S 972,544.39
100 120001 2008 8 1 12501000 1005152 H 101,491.17
100 120001 2008 8 2 12501000 1005152 S 100,978.91
100 120001 2008 9 1 12501000 1024054 H 786,767.54
100 120001 2008 9 2 12501000 1024054 S 782,796.46closed
-
Posting Subsequent Credit Using BAPI: BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE
Hi,
I need to post subsequent credits using BAPI: BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE.
In MIRO transaction we get option to select transaction (Invoice/Credit Memo/Subsequent Debit/Subsequent Credit).
But in case of BAPI I am not able to find such field. At headerdata there is one field INVOIC_IND to determine whether the system posts a credit memo or an invoice.
How can we post Subsequent Credit using this BAPI?
Regards,
UmeshHi,
For the BAPI below is the structure mapping.
<b>BAPI Structurename Field Value Value Description
Headerdata</b>
DOC_DATE 02/08/2005
INVOICE_IND X Post Invoice
PSTNG_DATE 02/08/2005
COMP_CODE 5010 Hospira Inc.
CURRENCY/ CURRENCY_ISO USD United States Dollar
GROSS_AMOUNT 100.0000
DOC_TYPE RE PO Invoice
REF_DOC_NO 1 Billing document no
EXCH_RATE 1.00000
CALC_TAX_IND X
HEADER_TXT header text
<b>Item Data</b>
INVOICE_DOC_ITEM 000001 Invoice Document no
PO_NUMBER 4500125768 PO No
PO_ITEM 1 PO item no
ITEM_AMOUNT 100.0000
QUANTITY 10.000
PO_UNIT EA Each
REF_DOC 5000000007 Goods Receipt No
REF_DOC_YEAR 2005 GR year
REF_DOC_IT 0001 Goods Receipt item no
TAX_CODE I0 AP, not relevant to tax
ITEM_TEXT Text
<b>Note:</b>For standard purchase order(Po's start with 45*****) it wont allow you to create without Goods Receipt. U can create an invoice without a Good receipt for only intercompany purchase orders.
If this is useful, pls reward with points.
Regards,
savitha -
POSTING ERROR-MESSAGE POSTING BALANCE NOT CLEARED FOR THE PERIOD 2/2008A
Hi
I have a problem in payroll posting. While posting for one employee's persn number rejected and gave a message as Posting Balance not cleared for the period 2/2008A. To come out of the problem I changed the Payroll status record using pu03 changed the Erliest Retro date as 01.06.2008. Again tried to post but not posted again same Message displayed. After changing the Erliest Retro record I have not run the payroll for the particular employee. Is it required to run the payroll for the employee after changing the status in PU03. Request to guide on this
Thanks
EKP YadavHi there
The posting may be out of balance for the employee because their credits dont equal their debits...
Do a test posting for the employee with the log on, this will tell you what amounts are being posted - and should give you an inidcation of where the balance is not cleared...
Yes, you would have to re-run the employee if you'd changed the retro date in PU03, but I dont think that will fix your posting problem....Should the employee have retroe'd?
From what I have seen, just changing the control record doesn't usually fix an out-of balance..there is usually another reason....eg wagetype incorrectly posting to the wrong number of accounts....or a missing wagetype on the employee (eg bank details...no /559 for the net pay to go to).
Cheers
Mary
Maybe you are looking for
-
How can I set Mail to show only one email at a time
Mail will group emails based on subject or sender and then I keep losing or missing emails because they get buried in a thread. Sometimes under another persons name! I'm old and easily confused. I just want one email per line. No grouping. Can't seem
-
BAPI/FM to Change Payment Terms ZTERM of FI Invoice
Hi, I am trying to chnage Payment Terms(BSEG-ZTERM) using FM FI_DOCUMENT_CHANGE and FM FI_ITEMS_MASS_CHANGE but none of these FM is working. For FI_DOCUMENT_CHANGE it is giving error "You cannot change Payment Terms(ZTERM) and inFM FI_ITEMS_MASS_CHAN
-
Optimized for Retina Display settings?
Are their settings to optimize a book for the new iPad retina display? At this moment, the updated applications still functions as if the resolution is 1024x768. Perhaps I a missing some new option somewhere?
-
Can't get TP-Link Tl-WN321G Wlan-USB-Stick to work.
I've recenetly bought the mentioned USB-Wlan-Stick as I thought that it was well supported in Linux, however, I can't get it to work. Any help would be appreciated I've installed rt73-cvs from the AUR, rt2x00-rt71w-fw form Core (rt73-cvs depends on t
-
Unable to extend temp segment by 8 in tablespace
I get tablespace error when I delete a table like delete * from table1 where acces_date > sysdate The table contains more than 10,00,00,000 rows. Why this error occurs and how to stop this error from occuring? Thanks.