Price conditions available in contract (MM)

Hi,
I created a new price condition and it is not available in tha match code in contract (ME32K).
How can I customize which condition are available in the contract ? Does it depend on the category of the condition ???
Thank you for your help,
Laetitia

Dear Laetitia,
a) Please check if this condition type "Manual Pricing" set as allow
b)Please check if you have include this condition type in your pricing procedure.
Transaction SPRO:
MM->Purchasing
->condition
-> Define Price Determination Process
-> Define calculation schemas
Regards,
ian, Wong Loke Foong

Similar Messages

  • How to update multiple Price conditions in FM CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN

    Hi All,
          need to update multiple price conditions in a contract Thru FM CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN.
    please see the piece of code that am using...
      am able to update single price condition...but not able to populate 2 or more .......i,e..ADD A Condition
    i,e...DATA : ls_cond TYPE prct_cond_external_input,
           lt_cond TYPE prct_cond_external_input_t.
    DATA : ls_con TYPE PRCT_COND_DU,
           lt_con TYPE PRCT_COND_DU_TAB.
    Create Condition Type
    *ls_con-KNUMV = lv_header_guid.
    *ls_con-KPOSN = lv_item_guid.
    ls_con-stunr  = '134'.
    IF Y EQ 1.
      ls_con-ZAEHK = '001'.
    ELSE.
       ls_con-ZAEHK = '002'.
    *ENDIF.
    *ls_con-kschl = 'ZFP1'.
    **ls_cond-waers = 'CNY'.
    *ls_con-kbetr = '0.00'.
    *ls_con-kpein = '1'.
    ls_cond-kschl = 'ZFP1'.
    ls_cond-waers = 'CNY'.
    ls_cond-kbetr = '0'.
    ls_cond-kpein = '1'.
    ls_cond-knumh = lv_item_guid .
    CLEAR ls_Price_doc.
    ls_Price_doc-ref_guid = lv_item_guid.
    ls_Price_doc-ref_kind = 'A'.
    IF Y EQ 1.
    ls_Price_doc-ref_handle = '000000001'.
    ELSE.
      ls_Price_doc-ref_handle = '000000002'.
    ENDIF.
    *ls_price_doc-PRIC_COND[] = lt_cond[].
    *INSERT ls_con into table ls_price_doc-PRIC_COND.
    INSERT ls_cond into table ls_price_doc-COND_ADD.
    INSERT ls_price_doc INTO TABLE lt_price_doc.
    ls_input_fields-ref_guid    = lv_item_guid.
    ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'KNUMH'.
    INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
    ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'KPOSN'.
    INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
    ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'KSCHL'.
    INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
    ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'KPEIN'.
    INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
    ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'STUNR'.
    INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
    ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'ZAEHK'.
    INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
    ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'WAERS'.
    INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
    ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'KBETR'.
    INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
    CLEAR ls_input_fields.
    Ls_input_fields-ref_guid    = lv_item_guid.
    ls_input_fields-ref_kind    = 'B'.
    ls_input_fields-objectname  = 'PRIDOC'.
    *ls_input_fields-logical_key = '0001'.
    ls_input_fields-field_names = lt_input_field_names.
    INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
    CLEAR ls_input_fields.
    CLEAR ls_Price_agreement.
    Clear ls_cond.
    I kept this under code. loop, for item records.....
    Though the internal table lt_price_doc. is holding all the records, it is updating only one record. can you any one pls guide me ,

    This example works fine for me. Modify it according to your needs...
    Price
                  IF it_item-value IS NOT INITIAL.
                    ls_cond-kschl = 'PR00'. " add price
                    ls_cond-kbetr = it_item-value.
                    ls_cond-waers = st_head-currency.
                    INSERT ls_cond INTO TABLE ls_pridoc_com-cond_add.   
                    index_2 = 1.
                    CLEAR: ls_cond.
                  ENDIF.
    Discount
                  IF it_item-discount IS NOT INITIAL.
                    ls_cond-kschl = 'ZPPP'. " add discount
                    wa_procent_calc = it_item-discount * 10.
                    ls_cond-kbetr = wa_procent_calc."it_item-discount.
                    ls_cond-waers = '%'."st_head-currency.
                    INSERT ls_cond INTO TABLE ls_pridoc_com-cond_add.   
                    index_2 = 1.
                    CLEAR: ls_cond, wa_procent_calc.
                  ENDIF.
                  IF index_2 = 1.
                    ls_pridoc_com-ref_handle = counter.
                    ls_pridoc_com-ref_kind = 'B'.
                    INSERT ls_pridoc_com INTO TABLE gt_pridoc_com.
                    CLEAR: index_2,ls_pridoc_com.
                  ENDIF.

  • Price condition determination for purchasing contract(ME31K)

    Hi Experts,
         It is possible to apply  price condition determination in purchasng contract(ME31K)?  We had maintain the price condition for below keys: WBS/Material number and this condition record work well in purchase order. But I hope that this condition record is applied in pruchasing contract when we create contract by ME31K. Plz kindly give me a suggestion.
    So I want to check the condition dtermination is whether fullfil my requirement. If we can not use the price condition determination to get the net price, then we only go for user-exit to get it.
    Thank you very much in advance.

    >
    Gangrong Chen wrote:
    > Hi Experts,
    >  
    >      It is possible to apply  price condition determination in purchasng contract(ME31K)?  We had maintain the price condition for below keys: WBS/Material number and this condition record work well in purchase order. But I hope that this condition record is applied in pruchasing contract when we create contract by ME31K. Plz kindly give me a suggestion.
    >
    > So I want to check the condition dtermination is whether fullfil my requirement. If we can not use the price condition determination to get the net price, then we only go for user-exit to get it.
    >
    > Thank you very much in advance.
    Why not, in me31k, click on condition button on toolbar for item conditions and for header conditions, click on menu bar path HEADER>CONDITIONS and maintain your conditions accordingly.

  • Report for Service price conditions in contracts esp. validity periods

    Hi all
    I need a report that will show validity periods against price conditions for services in a contract. Can't find anything through the menus, SAP Help, Google.
    Is there something as standard or will I need to cobble something together? The report needs to display conditions and validity periods by service / contract.
    Any ideas?
    Regards
    David

    Hi
    Thanks for those, I had already found and tried a couple of those transaction. For some reason, those transactions aren't returning any results. I can get results if I branch into the 'Conditon info' screen, but unfortunately in this case the actual service numbers aren't quoted.
    Regards
    David

  • SRM Local Contracts - Price Conditions

    Hi,
    We are trying to extract the price conditions from the SRM Local Contract line items, with the Condition Type, Valid From, Valid To, Amount, Price Unit, Unit.  This is to allow us to track the changes in contract prices.
    If you have any experience of this, or know which SRM tables we need to be extracting from it would be greatly appreciated!  We already have the Contract Header and Line information from CRMD_ORDERADM_H, CRMD_ORDERADM_I, BBP_PDHGP and BBP_PDIGP.  Where are the conditions stored?  And are there any extractors planned for this in the future?  It would be very useful standard content.
    Thanks.

    Hi
    Few BADIs to refer using SE18 Transaction (Please read standard documentation provided by SAP on them )
    BBP_IMS_CONTACT                Changes the Contract for the E-Mail
    BBP_CTR_INIT_UP                Contracts and GOAs to SRM
    BBP_CHANGE_SF_CTR    Change Smart Form for Contract Output              
    BBP_CND_UI_CTRL      BBP Conditions: UI Control                         
    BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE    Exit when Creating a Contract in the Backend System
    BBP_CTR_INIT_UP      BAdI to upload Contracts and GOAs to SRM           
    BBP_CTR_MAIL_BADI    BAdI for Changes Regarding Sending Mails           
    BBP_CTR_MASS_BADI    Implementation of Mass Change Parameters           
    BBP_CTR_STAT         BAdI to enable changes in the contract status      
    BBP_PROCESS_CTR      Process Smart Form with Changed Interface          
    BBP_QA_REDETERM_CTR  Redefine the Contract to be Used (Quota Arrangement)
    <b>Please go through these links -></b>
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/58/2a8442a07b0e53e10000000a155106/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/6d/1e8442a07b0e53e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/fd/dc804258544b76e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    Regards
    - Atul

  • PO price condition tied to a contract

    Hi,
    I have a scenario wherein I have to put in a PO price condition like freight against a different vendor which is not an issue.  However, the freight charges are actually covered by a contract and I would like to have the capability to link the PO freight condition against the said freight contract.  This is to allow me to monitor contract spend and do other contract management/reporting activities.  Has anyone have any ides on how this can be done?  Am on version 4.6C.  Thanks...

    Hi Ramesh!
    The currency rate should be used when converting the PB00 value from EUR currency to the local currency in tab Conditions at position level (the PO has as currency RON and the price condition PB00 has as currency EUR). The system will use this value (the converted value) also in GR as in IR.
    Thanks.

  • Price conditions from Info Record to PO

    Hi,
    While creating PO, Price conditions flow from Purch.info record.
    My requirement is => In the Item detail Conditions Tab, the price should not be available for editing (i.e.it should be in display mode) at end user level. If we need to modify the Amount against any condition it should be done only in info record only.
    How to address this requirement.
    Regards,
    Baskar

    Hi,
    1. Go to SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Authorization Management > Define Function Authorizations for Buyers > Function Authorizations: Purchase Order > Here "New Entries" and define Function Authorization Key as "01" and give description.
    OR use T. Code - OMET
    Here under "General parameters" subscreen,
    Activate "Display conditions" indicator and assign Field selection as "$DE1", do not select "Enter conditions"
    In "Possible ref. objects", select "W/o reference" otherwise reference documents (for e.g. PR, RFQ, etc...) for PO creation will become mandatory.
    2. Now go to SU01 > Enter User ID > Parameters Tab > Here for Parameter ID EFB i.e. Function Authorization: Purchase Order, maintain value "01" and check in PO field selection will get applied for that user.
    Now check in PO, Conditions will become in display mode.

  • Price Difference in Sub contracting

    Hi all,
    I have a question on price difference on sub-contracting.  The issue is, there is a sub contracting PO for Rs.100 for 10 units.  GR is done for 100 units.  Before the IR is done, there is a change in the PO price to Rs.60.  Further of the 10 units which was received, 6 units have been issued out.  Now the stock in hand is only 4 units.  As there is a price change, the difference in the price to the extent of the stock availability is posted to Stock account  (40/10*4 = 16) and the balance of price difference (for non-availability of stock) *shoud  be*  posted to price difference account.
    Wanted to confirm  from where is the price difference account is picked up for sub contract?  Whether it is the GL account given in PRD or FRL in OBYC settings.
    Also please throw light on how to stop the changing the price after GR and before IR.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Narasimhan.J

    Hi Kishore,
    Thanks for replying.  Yes, we use MAP only.
    I  created a test scenario and changed the GL accounts at Transaction FRL - External activitiy in OBYC settings and could see that the GL account specified in the FRL is picked up to post the price difference.
    To the extent of stock availablility it is posted to the FG account and  rest is posted to the GL account  specified in Transaction FRL in OBYC setting.
    Regards
    Narasimhan.J

  • Price Condition Depending of Material Master Record

    Helllo Experts, I have an issue with a price condition on a price procedure  the user wants to be able to mantain the price condition manually only if the material used at item level of sales order is equal to one of 3 sku´s.
    This Price condition can not be mantained on VK12 because it´s calculated manually depending of several factors.
    For Example, let´s say the Material ID´s are  1122, 1123 and 1124 and the price condition is ZY01.
    If the Mateial ID used at item level of sales document, the manual condition ZY01 shouldn´t be shown to the user only if the material used is equal to 1122, 1123 or 1124
    To solve this issue I was thinking to use at price procedure the field requirement and use a pricing routine as  "2" Item with pricing and edit the routine. the Material used at item level of sales document
    I´m not quire sure this is going to work, And what´s the name of the field I should use to get that
    Any Suggestion how to adress this  issue is welcome.

    Hello, I create my own condition table to include material field, also a new access sequence has been created, to link this table on field material I only can specify one material number, I capture there my material for wich I want this price condition work, but when I create a Contract on VA41 using the material included on my price condition, I´m able to mantain the amount, but the same happen when I try to use another material number not included on my access sequence.

  • Manual price condition (%) in order creation (using ABAP)

    Dear community members,
    I could use some help on a problem I have encountered while creating a sales order (in the CRM system) using ABAP programming, the details are given hereunder:
    I have two manual price conditions used to set a possible discount, one using a straight value and one using a percentage:
    1. When the order is generated using the value (let us say 100€) it cointains the correct price condition.
    2. On the other hand, when the order is generated using percentages (i.e. 10%), it is created without explicit errors or warnings but with no price condition in it.
    For the latter case I have checked the IPC logs (from transaction SM53) finding this error message:
    Message: Condition cannot be processed manually
    --> com.sap.spe.pricing.transactiondata.exc.ManualChangeNotAllowedException: Condition YSCP cannot be processed manually
    at com.sap.spe.pricing.transactiondata.impl.PricingCondition.changeConditionRate(Ljava/math/BigDecimal;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/math/BigDecimal;Ljava/lang/String;)V(PricingCondition.java:3124)
    at com.sap.spe.pricing.transactiondata.impl.HeaderCondition.changeConditionRate(Ljava/math/BigDecimal;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/math/BigDecimal;Ljava/lang/String;)V(HeaderCondition.java:387)
    at com.sap.spe.pricing.transactiondata.impl.PricingDocument.addHeaderCondition(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/math/BigDecimal;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/math/BigDecimal;Ljava/lang/String;C)Lcom/sap/spe/pricing/transactiondata/IHeaderCondition;(PricingDocument.java :1472)
    at com.sap.spe.document.rfc.AddPricingConditions.handleDocRequest()V(AddPricingConditions.java:131)
    at com.sap.spe.document.rfc.DocHandlerAdapter.handleRequest()V(DocHandlerAdapter.java:72)
    at com.sap.spe.base.util.jco.HandlerAdapter.handleRequest(Lcom/sap/vmc/RFCContainer/Call;)V(HandlerAdapter.java:117)
    at com.sap.vmc.remserver.RFCDispatcher.handleRequest2(Lcom/sap/conn/jco/JCoFunction;)V(RFCDispatcher.java:995)
    at com.sap.vmc.remserver.RFCDispatcher.handleRequest(Lcom/sap/conn/jco/JCoFunction;)V(RFCDispatcher.java:746)
    at com.sap.conn.jco.rt.VMCServer.dispatchRequest(Lcom/sap/conn/jco/JCoFunction;)V(VMCServer.java:911)
    at com.sap.conn.jco.rt.MiddlewareJavaRfc$JavaRfcServer.dispatchRequest(Lcom/sap/conn/jco/rt/ServerWorker;Ljava/lang/String;)V(MiddlewareJavaRfc.java:3415)
    at com.sap.conn.jco.rt.MiddlewareJavaRfc$JavaRfcServer.listen(Lcom/sap/conn/jco/rt/ServerWorker;)V(MiddlewareJavaRfc.java:2468)
    at com.sap.conn.jco.rt.VMCServer.listen()V(VMCServer.java:766)
    at com.sap.conn.jco.rt.VMCServer.run()V(VMCServer.java:689)
    at com.sap.vmc.remserver.RfcServer.run()V(RfcServer.java:376)
    at java.lang.Thread.startup(Z)V(Thread.java:1954)
    I have already debugged FM CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN but to no avail, maybe I just missed something and I can assure that the customizing is correct and aligned between the systems and both the conditions are set to be processed manually.
    At this point, since the condition is applied when the commit is yet to be done I wonder whether it is possible to apply a discount percentage on prices which are yet to be generated, it would be illogical to do so and then again while using a straight value (which does not require a calculation) the order is correctly generated.
    Furthermore when I add the conditions in an order (from both the GUI and the WUI) the table IT_PRIDOC is alway empty, even if CT_INPUT_FIELD is populated.
    I know that there are similar posts here in SCN but sadly I was not able to find a solution so any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance for any replies given,
    Alessandro.

    Dear Padma,
    apologies for my late reply. I also thought it should be possible to use a percentage but I was not sure.
    Sadly the debugging did not bring about any positive result.
    I also tried to make a second CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN call after the system generated all the pricing conditions but that also did not work.
    There is one thing that caught my attention though:
    - YSCV (fixed amount): still no problem at all (passed to KBETR);
    - YSCP (percent): if I assign a value to KWERT or if I leave all the fields empty, the condition is created in the sales order but it is always set to 0%. However, if I try to assign it to KBETR, I always get the message: "Condition YSCP cannot be processed manually".
    I made some attempts with the customizing, for example adding the condition to the "easy entries" or playing with the options of "Create Condition Types" (always aligning the systems) without getting positive output.
    I am beginning to think that it could be an IPC-related problem (which is not my area of expertise... yet).
    Alessandro.

  • User exit for Price Conditions in VA02 (update,insert or delete conditions)

    Hi folks. I would like to know if anyone of you has already worked with transaction VA02...I need a user exit, which could be capable to: Erase, Update and Insert new Price Conditions.
    Scenario: The user will not enter into the Price Conditions Tab. He will only make some modifications to the document via VA02 and when he saves the document, then the user exit should update, erase or include new conditions based on some logic that the user exit will implement. does anyone know a user exit for this particular case, please !
    Thanks in advance.

    HI,
    Check this.
    V60F0001                                SD Billing plan (customer enhancement) diff. to billing plan 
    V46H0001                                SD Customer functions for resource-related billing           
    V45W0001                                SD Service Management: Forward Contract Data to Item         
    V45S0004                                Effectivity type in sales order                              
    V45S0003                                MRP-relevance for incomplete configuration                   
    V45S0001                                Update sales document from configuration                     
    V45P0001                                SD customer function for cross-company code sales            
    V45L0001                                SD component supplier processing (customer enhancements)     
    V45E0002                                Data transfer in procurement elements (PRreq., assembly)     
    V45E0001                                Update the purchase order from the sales order               
    V45A0004                                Copy packing proposal                                        
    V45A0003                                Collector for customer function modulpool MV45A              
    V45A0002                                Predefine sold-to party in sales document                    
    V45A0001                                Determine alternative materials for product selection        
    SDTRM001                                Reschedule schedule lines without a new ATP check                                                                               
    Business Add-in                                                                               
    BADI_SD_SCH_GETWAGFZ                    Scheduling Agreement: Read WAGFZ from S073                   
    BADI_SD_V46H0001                        SD Customer functions for resource-related billing           
    Regards
    Rajendra

  • Price condition display in VA01 and VA02

    Hi Friends,
    In our organization, we want that some of the users could not change the price conditions in t. code VA01 and VA02.
    Please help us.
    Thanks
    Ganesh

    Dear Tiwari,
    As Lakshmipathi mentioned, if you want to restrict the access to all users, then goto V/06; there you uncheck the value field.
    If you wan to restrict the access to specific users, then make use of the authorization objects available in the Tcode SU21 (preferably, V_KONH_VKS). or create the custom one; check with your basis team and your ABAPer to do the same.
    thanks
    Venkatesh SP

  • Enhancing Price Conditions to PO

    Hi Experts,
    I am working on a requirement on PO Price Conditions. It is required to update the price condition of PO according to certain customer fields on the PO line items. I have tried several BAdi with no luck.
    BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI - cannot actually change the document
    BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI - does not offer the price condition information
    BPP_DOC_SAVE_BADI - worse, just provide the document GUI
    tried to use some other function modules (condadd*), but no luck as well.
    those are internal function modules and are coupled with some global variants/checkings
    Anyone has experience on this ?
    Any advice ? Many Thanks.
    Yours,
    Chun Fai

    Thanks Jay,
    I have done a debugging with the function module "BBP_PD_PO_UPDATE".
    However, i found that the function module does not process the price condition at all.
    Internal tables for price documents are always empty.
    Even when a condition is added using the screen control, the price document is not available as well.
    Values manually updated during debug does not take any effect.
    The document information is not full available. (e.g. the header GUID, etc)
    Certainly we can call other function modules to obtain such document informations (BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL, BBP_PD_PO_ITEM_GETDETAIL)
    However, I am doubtful as to
    1. whether the function module can handle the information as proposed
    2. whether price document creation, etc, "backend" operations are required if no condition pre-exists
    3. whether there are other side effects
    At the meantime, I am still looking forward to solutions around BAdi, in order to keep the complexity and side effects to a minimum. Enhancement framework has more or less side effects on the existing system functions.
    PS: the price condition function modules i mentioned in the first message are "PRC_PD_ITEM_ADD_COND",  "PRC_PD_ITEM_CHANGE_COND" and  "PRC_PD_ITEM_DELETE_COND".
    Any other experience or recommendations?
    Many thanks.
    Yours,
    Chun Fai

  • Price conditions in bid.

    Hi all,
    I have a simple question: it is possible to deactivate the range of validity in the price conditions of a bid.
    The price conditions is available for the vendor if the flag USE_CONDITIONS is set in the bid invitations, but I have to insert two price conditions with the same range of dates.
    Best regards,
    Norberto.

    Hi Muthu,
    Yes, i can. I have simulated the creation of on PO via me21n with the same conditions, and all works fine.
    Just to be clearer.
    The case that raise the issue was the follwing:
    SRM - Bid Offer
    1 Line item:
    Gross amount 15,17
    Discount %: 25%
    Then the PO is created in R/3 and we find the following:
    Gross Amount: 11,38
    Discount %: 25%
    Final price: 8,54
    The final price calculated is wrong, because the discount has been apllied two times.
    I hope this help to clarify the issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Valentino

  • Price conditions download problem

    Hi!
    I have a problem with downloading to CRM price conditions. I have some price objects (DNL_COND_A002, DNL_COND_A003...) in R3AM1 with yellow light. They stuck in queue with SYSFAIL. In SMW01 for specific BDoc I have message:
    Target table CNCCRMPRSAP002 is not actively available
    There is no active target table for an application for usage A.
    Error when carrying out initial download.
    Objects:
    DNL_CUST_CND
    DNL_CUST_PRC
    DNL_CUST_FGD
    were downloaded correctly.
    I've tried to find table CNCCRMPRSAP002 in CRM but it doesn't exists. Please help!
    Best regards
    P

    Hi Piotr,
    You could think of generating the adapter object in transaction SMOGGEN.
    and also check the table CNCCRMPRSAP002 is activated in CRM system,then upload the adapter object.
    I hope, this could help you...
    Regarsd,
    Saurabh

Maybe you are looking for