Price difference generated after GR reversal

Hi Gurus,
Issue: Price difference generated after GR reversal
Here we have confirmed an operation of a Production order & few minutes later cancelled the same.But after the cancellation it is found that some amount is always hitting to price difference account.
Can u pls tell me why such thing are happening?
Is it normal or some setting is missed in configuration?
Thanks & Regards,
Gouranga

Thanks for ur reply.
But the Price control indicator is Standard Price (S) & settlement has not been done befor cancelling the same.
Pls guide if any other reason is there.
Thanks
Gouranga

Similar Messages

  • Expense for the price difference by reversing entry of goods

    Hi Experts,
    There is an Expense for the price difference by reversing entry of goods.   Conceptually is this correct?
    Thanks in advance.
    José Luis

    Hi 
    Price difference during reversal of GR may be correct due to the change in price between GR & reversal.
    It depends on price control whether S-Std price or V-Moveing average price in the Material Master accounting view.
    Karthik

  • Price difference after return of saled goods.

    Hi gurus,
    Please help me to solve one scenario.
    I sale X material for Y price to my customer.But due to some problem if he returns my material.
    If I want to take that material in stock again for Z price that will be less than price Y, then what should I do.
    i.e.Suppose sale price-100 Rs and I want retun price should be -90 Rs.
    How would I handle this price difference.
    Pl help.
    Regards,
    rb

    Hi Bruce,
    Thanks for your reply.
    Can this will change my material price having price control "V".
    Because I don't want to change my material price.
    Waiting for your reply.
    Regards,
    rb

  • Price Difference GL significance

    Hi experts,
    Please clear my doubt at the time of FG scrapping which GL a/c should get hit.
    Price differnce a/c  OR  Loss on scrapping of FG a/c should get debited.
    To FG Inventory a/c
    Now if the above FG after scrapping is generated as scrap-by product to be used in production as raw material what should be the entry.
    What is the significance of PRD a/c.
    Regards,
    Divraj

    If the FG is scrapped
    Dr Loss on scrapping of FG a/c
    Cr FG a/c
    If you are converting the FG into another form
    Dr FG By product
    Dr Loss on scrapping of FG a/c(If the by product value is low)
    Cr FG a/c
    Price difference is, when you receive debit/credit note for the goods from the vendor, if the respective goods are available then price differece posted to Inventory account, if the inventory is already consumed or sold then price difference goes to price difference account.
    Rgds
    Murali. N

  • Price difference in MAP material

    Hi,
       I am taking a material which is managed Batch wise and split valuation is active, while valuation type is moving average price.
    when doing the goods issue for the material, it is hitting the entry in Price difference account..
    But when I am reversing the same GI document, it does not hit the Price Difference account. It loads the Price difference on inventory.
    but requirement is that, during reversal of goods issue it should post the PRD account by whatever amount was posted in PRD account during Goods Issue.
    Please help me out, how to solve this. By any means, can we post the entry in PRD when material is managed by MAP.
    Thanks,
    Varun

    Hi,
      Material A is batch managed with split valuation active. In the material master valuation type  MAP is maintained.
    When doing the Good Receipt of this material with quantity 1, with 475 $, MAP changes to 475$ for newly generated batch valuation.
    When doing the Goods Issue at 300$ with quantity 1, inventory account is credited by 300$, and 175$ is debited to Gain/loss account.
    When reversing this GI document, material account is debited by 475$. But my requirement is that, it should debit material account by 300$ only and 175$ should be credited to Gain/loss account.
    Hope, now I am able to clear my requirement.
    Thanks,
    Varun

  • Price difference-when process change

    Hi,
    Presently in costing sheet there are two continuous processes, both are considered as SFG (semi finished goods). The SFG 1 material in first process is the BOM part of the second process SFG 3 material. Both process has different cost centres, overheads and cost elements.
    Now the second process of SFG material takes more than 9 months. So want to show this WIP under maturation stock, as separate stock under new SFG 2 material, with some value addition (considered as activity). This new process related SFG 2 material BOM will contains the first process SFG 1 material. And this new SFG 2 material code will be the part of BOM of the last process SFG 3 material.
    Now there are 2 issues we are facing.
    1st query:
    In quality server after transporting the request from Development, Price difference account is generated while production of the 3rd Process SFG 3 material.
    Production made for 1000 AL Qty (Base Qty of BOM 1000 AL and Costing lot size 1000 AL ) and in the entry we are getting the Price difference entry as shown below.
    Dr. Inventory SFG3 - 105,897.43
    Cr. Incr/Decr/Cons SFG 3 - 105,900.00
    Cr. Price difference - 2.57
    Cr. Inventory SFG2 - 94,550.00
    Dr. Incr/Decr/Cons SFG2 - 94,550.00
    Standard cost of SFG 3 for 1000 AL is 105,897.43 and Standard cost of SFG 2 for 1000 AL is 94,550.00
    May i know why the price difference account is picked up while doing the production of existing material SFG 3, when there is no such difference in development server. And no Price difference account in Quality server before introducing the new process?
    Regards
    Vinu.

    hi

  • Price difference on cancellation of production order confirmation

    Hi,
    We are having a material which is maintained at price control "S". We have created a production order for the material. In due course of business, we did confirmation for say 100 pcs of the material. However, immediatly on confirmation, we realized that we do not need to do the confirmation & hence we did the cancellation of the production order confirmation using CO13.
    On doing the production order confirmation cancellation, we observed that the system has posted some amount to "price difference account"
    We also observed that once in a while this kind of entries do get posted.
    It is requested to please let us know in why system is behaving this way?
    We have checked SAP Note no 216080 "Price difference when reversing GI for S-Priced material" & SAP Note no 215980 'Price difference during GR for the production order". However we are not convinced that these could be the reason for the price difference.
    Thanking you in anticipation
    Regards
    Santosh Kumar Agarwal

    Hi,
    Yes, you are correct in the understanding that the system creates quants in 914 when the production order confirmation is cancelled. But, it does not generate any TR or TO in the background to post the stock back into the original storage type.
    Can we not use the put away strategies so that the system determines where to place the material? My query is that despite all the configurations for automatic TO creation and confirmation for movement type 262, it does not generate a TO (or TR) in the background when a production order confirmation is cancelled using CO13.
    However, if I manually post a material using MB1A for 261 movement type and reverse it using 262, it generates a TO and confirms it as per the setting in configuration.
    The same thing does not work when we run it through PP (CO11N and then CO13).
    Any suggestions on how to approach this and where to check for missing configurations?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Gaurishankar

  • Price differences and GR/IR

    Hi
    A question on price differences.
    We currently post our price differences at goods receipt (PO price - Std price).
    And secondly at invoice receipt (PO price - Actual price)
    In order to be able to analyze easier, we want to post goods receipts always against standard price.
    At invoice receipt the full price differences should be posted then.
    Does anyone know if and how this setting is possible in SAP ?
    Thanks.

    Unfortunately, I'm not sure if this can be done.  I just wanted to point out that you may wish to reconsider doing this as some of your receipts would not have variances recognized until a month or so after the original goods receipt.  If the terms are net 30 (or whatever), the invoice would not be paid for 30 days and the variance wouldn't be recorded until the invoice is paid.  The idea behind using the PO Expected Price is to book the amount as close to 'actual' as possible upon receipt of the goods.

  • Price Difference Account being hit while making AP credit Memo

    Hello Experts,
    Price Difference Account is being hit while creating AP Credit Memo. I am creating an independent AP Credit Memo (i.e. without any base document). After posting A/P Credit Memo when I look at the Journal Entry it shows 99.43% of amount goes to Price Difference Account and the rest 0.57% goes to Stock account.
    Help required please.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Edited by: Shahzad Nazir on Jan 19, 2011 5:54 PM

    Hi Nazir,
    This entry may have resulted because once you created the GRPO say for item A, the stock would have been consumed in production. And once you created Invoice and after that when you created credit memo, the system could not find the stock so it posted the difference in price difference account. Please run inventory posting list of the items in grpo to check the same.
    Thanks,
    Joseph

  • While posting MIRO price difference account is not determimg for price vari

    Hi Sapients,
    Please solve the production issue which we have faced yesterday while doing month end closing
    In one P.O 4 items are there,User has posted entries in below sequence
    Material type is TRADING GOODS
    1)first MIRO with QTY 10 @100$ each,Later
    2)MIGO has done with QTY 10 @100$
    Raw Material account -
    1000$
    to GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
    1000$
    2)User has reverse the MIRO transaction with QTY 10 @ 100$ each.(with refer to step1)
    3)Finally he post MIRO with QTY 10 @ 90$ each, so here ther is no qty variance has come only price variance has come, so when posting the difference is not going to price difference and the entry is paasing like this
    GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
    900$
    TO Vendor 900$
    If u see in step 2 GR/IR having 1000$, but in step 3 while MIRO posting GR/IR as 900$ so for the remaing balance 100$ not going to price variance .I Belive the entry in step will be like this
    GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
    1000$
    TO Vendor 900$
    TO Price difference 100$.
    Kindly give solution why it is not going to price difference it was happening only for item 2 & 3 only for 40 iem it is posting correctly to price difference account.Please advice me why system behavig differently for each item.
    Thanks & Regards
    YSR

    Hi Padmasri,
    Thanks for your explanation. Ok. if the price is maintained in S, does that mean the price difference would get posted only to PRD. In other words, if price indicator is V, is that the only time when the price difference gets posted to stock account. In case if there is no sufficient stock or if there is negative stock at that time, that's when the amount would get posted to stock loss or gain account. Please suggest if I've understood the concept right.
    Hi,
    The PRD will trigger when the standard price maintained in the material mater record is different from the price in MIGO . The other chance is the material is maintained with MAP and MIRO done before GR ,The value of the quntity (not available in stock )
    will get posted to PRD. I hope this will resolve your issue. Thanking you
    You had suggested: The other chance is the material is maintained with MAP and MIRO done before GR ,The value of the quntity (not available in stock ) will get posted to PRD. I hope this will resolve your issue.
    You are right: I forgot to mention that the price indicator is V. The other point is we purchase the materials from an internal vendor, as and when the materials are dispatched from the main storehouse in Sri Lanka, there is an advice that is created in the system and that is interfaced and parked in the system. However, normally until the GR is done IV will not happen. But there could be a chance, as the advice gets created within 24 hours. However the material to reach the godown in our warehouse will take more than 24 hours as the goods have to be shipped from SL, so IV is possible before GR.
    Regards,
    Soujanya

  • Price Difference Account - ML force OK

    We have to force ok Material ledger Job for previous period after period has been closed. For whatever reason user did not include valuation area in the material ledger and based on SAP Note 361236 we forced for that particular plant.
    When we ran single level it usually post to " Finsished Goods Invent - Std" account , however in this case it posted to price difference account.
    Can anyone help to understand how/why  it picked different account for single level/multi level?
    Will it cause any impact for subsequent periods for valuation area that is Material Legder forced ok?
    which account keys do I need check for the Material ledgeger posting in automatic account assignments?
    Anyhelp or insights will be greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Mohan

    Hi Mohan ,
    Please reveiw SAP Note 908737 - Post Closing in Material Ledger .. which will clarify your doubts and answer your query..
    Account Determination is very well explained here..
    All of your answers will be in the note.. For any further clarifications.. please revert back..
    Regards
    Sarada

  • Price Difference GL During MIRO

    We have  a scenario where we receive Invoice for a material (with MAP) after some time of GR for e.g., 10 to 15 days of GR. Mean while we consume some of the stocks already received. When we post invoice (MIRO) with some price changes to PO price, system checks the stock overview and posts the proportionate amount to Material account and Price Difference account (PRD), which is a standard behavior of SAP. But, we dont want the amount to be posted to PRD. We want to post the entire amount to material account only.
    Can anybody suggest the workaround solution for this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Bharathi

    Hi
    Another process, though manual would be, to activate the Material Tab in MIRO. There after, what ever, quantity is available in stock you can pass a debit or credit to material. However, it is not the suggested correct way as MAP will not be in propotion to existing stock quantity.
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

  • Price Difference in Sub contracting

    Hi all,
    I have a question on price difference on sub-contracting.  The issue is, there is a sub contracting PO for Rs.100 for 10 units.  GR is done for 100 units.  Before the IR is done, there is a change in the PO price to Rs.60.  Further of the 10 units which was received, 6 units have been issued out.  Now the stock in hand is only 4 units.  As there is a price change, the difference in the price to the extent of the stock availability is posted to Stock account  (40/10*4 = 16) and the balance of price difference (for non-availability of stock) *shoud  be*  posted to price difference account.
    Wanted to confirm  from where is the price difference account is picked up for sub contract?  Whether it is the GL account given in PRD or FRL in OBYC settings.
    Also please throw light on how to stop the changing the price after GR and before IR.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Narasimhan.J

    Hi Kishore,
    Thanks for replying.  Yes, we use MAP only.
    I  created a test scenario and changed the GL accounts at Transaction FRL - External activitiy in OBYC settings and could see that the GL account specified in the FRL is picked up to post the price difference.
    To the extent of stock availablility it is posted to the FG account and  rest is posted to the GL account  specified in Transaction FRL in OBYC setting.
    Regards
    Narasimhan.J

  • Issue Price Difference Acct. in JE of goods return

    Dear all,
    There is issue in price difference account(Defined as Material Purchase Gain A/c in warehouse)
    in good return journal entry,
    Eloborating problem : User booking subcontracting grpo for qty 1470.024 with price also for 1470.024,
    JE for GRPO is Sub Contracting Charges A/c Dr to Sub Contracting Charges Clearing A/c Cr.
    ie.,
    Sub Contracting Charges a/c Dr -11,92,189.46
    Sub Contracting Charges Clearing A/c Cr -11,92,189.46
    Now they partially do good return for qty 811 with price 1470.024,
    JE for  Goods return is
    Material Purchase Gains A/c Dr -11,78,900.46 
    Sub Contracting Charges a/c Dr -13,289
    Sub Contracting Charges Clearing A/c Cr -11,92,189.46
    Actually sub contracting charges a/c should have been debited to 11,92,189.46,
    Why it is hitting Material purchase gains a/c ?
    Pl clarify it.
    Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on May 21, 2009 3:26 PM

    Hai!
    As per my understanding,
    Stock Acc always in Asset Draw, Price Diff Acc in Expense Draw.
    For Example..
    1.I am purchasing a item of 10 qty each 1 rupee through GRPO.
    2.It will post a JE like stock acc INR 10 Debit and GRNI Acc 10 Credit.
    3.After that i have transfered my 5 qty to some other warehouse.
    4.I am booking a AP invoice with that GRPO as base, now i have changed my price to 2 rupee.
    5.It will post a JE like stock acc INR 5(51 which like in warehouse) debit, GRNI Acc INR 10 debit, price Diff Acc INR 5 Debit (51 go as expence) and Vendor INR 20 Credit.
    Regards,
    Thanga Raj.K

  • Price difference allocation of m-type '301'

    Dear all,
    for certain material, we using m-type '301-TF transfer plnt to plnt' to transfer the stock from one plant to another one. however, after price determination and revalution consumption, price difference can not allocate to these items(CKM3) .
    would anyone help me?
    thanks,
    Ben

    Hi Ben Wu,
    Do not know how you processed CKMLCP. Anyway the alternative way to test this is select only one material for which stock transfers happened...
    Step 1) run CKMF - Allow Material Price Determination
            2) run CKMH - Determine Material Prices (Single-Level)
            3) run CKMG - Allow Closing Entries
            4) run CKMI - Post Closing
    From the first two step itself you can analyse whether the price determination considers the price difference. If so proceed to run 3rd and 4th step.
    Then check CKM3 it would be fine.
    Regards,
    Velumani

Maybe you are looking for