Price difference allocation of m-type '301'

Dear all,
for certain material, we using m-type '301-TF transfer plnt to plnt' to transfer the stock from one plant to another one. however, after price determination and revalution consumption, price difference can not allocate to these items(CKM3) .
would anyone help me?
thanks,
Ben

Hi Ben Wu,
Do not know how you processed CKMLCP. Anyway the alternative way to test this is select only one material for which stock transfers happened...
Step 1) run CKMF - Allow Material Price Determination
        2) run CKMH - Determine Material Prices (Single-Level)
        3) run CKMG - Allow Closing Entries
        4) run CKMI - Post Closing
From the first two step itself you can analyse whether the price determination considers the price difference. If so proceed to run 3rd and 4th step.
Then check CKM3 it would be fine.
Regards,
Velumani

Similar Messages

  • Movement type 301

    Can anyone tell me what is the difference between the movement types 301 and 641. When is it not possible to use the movement type 301 for stock transfer between plants?
    Thanks in advance
    Tara

    Hello,
    Movement Type 301 - Transfer posting plant to plant in one step
    The quantity is transferred from unrestricted-use stock in the issuing plant to unrestricted-use stock in the receiving plant.
    Movement Type 641 - Goods issue for a stock transport order (Two step process)
    The quantity is transferred using delivery from unrestricted-use stock of the issuing plant to stock in transit of the receiving plant.
    I have not used 641 but if it is 2 step then
    in 1st step u need to issue the goods from suppling plant to the reciving plant & as it is 2 step then the stocks are going to be in reciving plant transit
    then again u have to use the tcode for the reciving of stock and probably movemnt type is going to be 643 to recive the goods at reciving plant
    Reward points if helpful,
    Regards,
    Archit

  • Allocation of Price Difference

    Dear Experts,
    I am working for a cement industry. One of our Semi Finished material is Clinker which we will be using against production of cement and we sell clinker also.
    The price control for Clinker is maintained as standard in system (150). There are 10 process orders for Clinker (5000 TO) and against each process order I have Variance totalling to 10000.
    So the actual cost of 5000 TO should be = 150 * 5000 + 10000
                                                                      = 750000 + 10000
                                                                      = 760000
    In my Production order Price Difference GL I can find the Production order variance 10000 + variance due to change in price
    Production order Price Difference GL = 10000 + 2500
                                                                = 12500
    The total production of Clinker is 5000 TO.
    I have sold 1500 TO, 2500 Issued against process order and 1000 TO in my stock.
    All has gone at standard price i.e 150 / To
    I would like to know how I can allocate the production order variance of 10000 against Goods Sold, Goods Issued, Closing Stock.
    Is there any way system will give me the allocation chart. Please help.
    Thanks.

    Hi
    You can use KKO0 reports to see variance per cost component...
    Map each of these act types to a separate cost como in OKTZ... Assign this cost comp in OKN0 and choose Mat Grup = Product Group
    Then run KKRV to collect the data followed by KKO0
    Ajay M

  • How to determine price difference account for 301 MT?

    I know that 309 movement type is used for tranferring a material to another material . If the prices of two materials are different, price difference will go into transferring account determined by transaction key AUM.
    301 movement type is used for transferring material A from plant 1000 to plant 2000. Suppose a scenerio:
    plant 1000, material A, standard price 115,
    plant 2000, material A, standard price 100,
    so, if I use MB1B to do a transfer posting, the  accounting entry must be:
    Dr: stock posting account    100
         price difference account   15
       Cr: stock posting account   115
    What I doubt is, in this scenerio, How to determine this price difference account in OMJJ and OBYC? It is also determined by transction key AUM like 309?
    Hope you can help. Thanks.

    I have checked that price difference account of 309 MT is also determined by AUM. But, from SAP documentation, AUM is described like this:  "This transaction is used for transfer postings from one material to another if the complete value of the issuing material cannot be posted to the value of the receiving material. " So I think that AUM is is used for transferring one material to another material, not used for transferring a material from one plant to another plant.  It is different therotically, I think. but, in practice, 301 and 309 both use AUM for price difference account.
    THis is my doubt.

  • Price difference types

    Hi all,
    I want to know all the cases for which the difference amount hits the price diff account.
    for Eg. if the amount (1000 Rs) in PO and Invoice amount is (1500 Rs) then the difference amount (500 Rs) will hit the price difference account.
    Regards,
    Shruti.

    hi shruti
    in sap we have two types of price control
    1)Standard price
    2)Moving average price
    Suppose if u use price control as standard in MMR. if there is any variance in price, difference amount will post to PRD account
    Suppose if u use price control as Moving average  in MMR. if there is any variance in price, difference amount will post to Stock  account
    1)create mmr with standard price.> create PO > Migo > MIRO in invoice receipts change the amount goto simulate tab
    Income - price variances if the price is less.
    if the IR price is less than GR price its income
    Loss - price variances if the price is more. 
    if the IR price is more than GR price its loss
    2)create mmr with moving average price.> create PO > Migo > MIRO in invoice receipts change the amount goto simulate tab
    in this case variances  will post to stock account only
    regard
    avinash

  • Price difference invoice allocation to items

    If a customer sends a price difference invoice and when we  are entering it in the system we want to allocate this value to the reference invoice items based on their values how should we do it?
    For example:
    There was a preeceding invoice
    material A  2  pieces   10 EURO=20 EURO
    Material B 4 peices 20 EURO=80 Euro
    So total value is 100 in this invoice.
    Then customer realizes that this value is too much and they ask for payment by a price difference invoice. This price difference invoice value is 20 Euro. This invoice does not include items just this 20 Euro value.
    When entering it to the system the preeceding invoice is selected. But how will this 20 euro rice difference will be distributed to the items in the preeceding invoice ?
    For material A it should be 4 and for material b it should be 16 if we distribute it based on value.
    For material A it should be 6 and for material b it should be 14 if we distribute it based on quantity.
    How can I do it in the system?
    Thanks,

    Hi Sevdada
    You need to set up approriate conditions to create the credit memo request according to your business requirements.
    You've laid out the two options, but you haven't said which one the business has decided on - value based or quantity based.
    James

  • Could anyone tell what's diff between mvt type 301 and 647?

    Hi,
    Since there has 301 already why still need 647??
    What's the difference???
    Thanks!!!
    Would be better tell some detail regarding the movement type useage and difference in different module...
    Thank you very much

    Hi,
    Movement type 301 is used to transfer material from a storage location in one plant to a storage location in a different plant. The value of the material is transferred at the moving average price of the issuing plant.
    Movement 301 needs to be used each time material is moved from plant to plant. Normally both plants would be within the same agency and the physical distance not great when this movement type is used.
    A goods issue for a stock transport order with delivery in Shipping is posted using movement types 641, 643, 645, or 647.
    647 Goods issue for a stock transport order in one step
    (Shipping)
    Unlike movement type 641 when a goods issue is posted using movement type 647, a goods receipt line (movement type 101) is generated automatically in the receiving plant. If a purchase order item is flagged as a returns item in the stock transport order, you can post the goods receipt of the returns in the issuing plant with movement type 677.
    For more knowledge in Movement type check out this
    http://forum.saptechies.com/viewtopic.php?p=7505&sid=ee37f12564fc1c8aa9e5e131a5f402d9
    Reward if this helps you
    Regards
    AK

  • Change Multi-Level Price Difference Process Category

    Hello ML Gurus,
    We have a situation
    Our I2P team has certain process orders that are recursive -- header material the same as component.  (These are NOT rework order types, but standard process order type PR01).  In the beginning, they posted GR as process category "Receipts", and GI as process category "Consumption". This resulted in cyclical error during CKMLCP.  When we cut off connections and ran, it left a huge price difference as "Not Allocated".
    To circumvent this problem, I2P used a BADI to change the process category for the consumption to "Receipts".  Everything was ok, until the monthend.  When we do the Multi-Level Price Determination, the price difference gets posted to Consumption only, and since the original consumption is moved to "Receipts", the entire price difference is now "Not Allocated".
    We think we can fix this by changing the process category for the multi-level price difference to "Receipts" also.
    Is there a way to do it?  Any BADI, User Exit, Enhancement -- anything?
    Also, this is not a pretty design....do you have a suggestion for improving the overall process?  We used to have a Product Cost Collector and post these consumption and then settle them monthly, but we lost traceability for the batches so we cannot and do not use them.
    Appreciate your help.
    Cheers,
    TD

    Hi,
    Basically single level price determination calculates periodic unit price based prices differences for that material alone is considered
    Multilevel price determination considers its own differences as well those of the input materials.
    Hence single level price determination is a prerequisite for multilevel determination
    Ganesan

  • While posting MIRO price difference account is not determimg for price vari

    Hi Sapients,
    Please solve the production issue which we have faced yesterday while doing month end closing
    In one P.O 4 items are there,User has posted entries in below sequence
    Material type is TRADING GOODS
    1)first MIRO with QTY 10 @100$ each,Later
    2)MIGO has done with QTY 10 @100$
    Raw Material account -
    1000$
    to GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
    1000$
    2)User has reverse the MIRO transaction with QTY 10 @ 100$ each.(with refer to step1)
    3)Finally he post MIRO with QTY 10 @ 90$ each, so here ther is no qty variance has come only price variance has come, so when posting the difference is not going to price difference and the entry is paasing like this
    GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
    900$
    TO Vendor 900$
    If u see in step 2 GR/IR having 1000$, but in step 3 while MIRO posting GR/IR as 900$ so for the remaing balance 100$ not going to price variance .I Belive the entry in step will be like this
    GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
    1000$
    TO Vendor 900$
    TO Price difference 100$.
    Kindly give solution why it is not going to price difference it was happening only for item 2 & 3 only for 40 iem it is posting correctly to price difference account.Please advice me why system behavig differently for each item.
    Thanks & Regards
    YSR

    Hi Padmasri,
    Thanks for your explanation. Ok. if the price is maintained in S, does that mean the price difference would get posted only to PRD. In other words, if price indicator is V, is that the only time when the price difference gets posted to stock account. In case if there is no sufficient stock or if there is negative stock at that time, that's when the amount would get posted to stock loss or gain account. Please suggest if I've understood the concept right.
    Hi,
    The PRD will trigger when the standard price maintained in the material mater record is different from the price in MIGO . The other chance is the material is maintained with MAP and MIRO done before GR ,The value of the quntity (not available in stock )
    will get posted to PRD. I hope this will resolve your issue. Thanking you
    You had suggested: The other chance is the material is maintained with MAP and MIRO done before GR ,The value of the quntity (not available in stock ) will get posted to PRD. I hope this will resolve your issue.
    You are right: I forgot to mention that the price indicator is V. The other point is we purchase the materials from an internal vendor, as and when the materials are dispatched from the main storehouse in Sri Lanka, there is an advice that is created in the system and that is interfaced and parked in the system. However, normally until the GR is done IV will not happen. But there could be a chance, as the advice gets created within 24 hours. However the material to reach the godown in our warehouse will take more than 24 hours as the goods have to be shipped from SL, so IV is possible before GR.
    Regards,
    Soujanya

  • Price difference in MAP material

    Hi,
       I am taking a material which is managed Batch wise and split valuation is active, while valuation type is moving average price.
    when doing the goods issue for the material, it is hitting the entry in Price difference account..
    But when I am reversing the same GI document, it does not hit the Price Difference account. It loads the Price difference on inventory.
    but requirement is that, during reversal of goods issue it should post the PRD account by whatever amount was posted in PRD account during Goods Issue.
    Please help me out, how to solve this. By any means, can we post the entry in PRD when material is managed by MAP.
    Thanks,
    Varun

    Hi,
      Material A is batch managed with split valuation active. In the material master valuation type  MAP is maintained.
    When doing the Good Receipt of this material with quantity 1, with 475 $, MAP changes to 475$ for newly generated batch valuation.
    When doing the Goods Issue at 300$ with quantity 1, inventory account is credited by 300$, and 175$ is debited to Gain/loss account.
    When reversing this GI document, material account is debited by 475$. But my requirement is that, it should debit material account by 300$ only and 175$ should be credited to Gain/loss account.
    Hope, now I am able to clear my requirement.
    Thanks,
    Varun

  • Sales invoice Price difference

    Hi gurus,
    Please help me to solve this  scenario.
    I sale 10 units  material for 100 each  price to my customer.
    But due to some problem if he returns my material. When we Replace the material there is a Price Difference.
    Now we are using Moving Average Price.
    now I want to sale that material  again for 90 each price that will be less than price 100.
    The main issue is: “ I can not change the (financial postings)invoice price when I replace the goods, this is legal requirement here”
    How would I handle this price difference.
    Please help.
    Regards,
    George

    Hi George,
                  You can maintain different pricing procedure for returns and assign that Pricing procedure in the transaction OVKK with the combination of Sales Area + return Document pricing procedure+Custpmer pricing procedure.
    Maintain condition records for the condition types through VK11
    I  hope It will solve your problem.
    Regards,
    Murali.

  • Price Difference Account and Change in Stock  Account

    Hi Experts,
    What are the main differences between "Change in Stock Account" and "Price Difference Account" ?
    Can anybody plz provide me the documents which gives sequential entries from GR to Payement involving these two Accounts?
    Regds,
    Bijay

    Hi
    Change in stock is triggered when goods are delivered to stock (Fg location) thru movement type 101 - GR for an order.
    During PGI - entry posted is
    COGS                 -        Dr
    FG Inventory        -        Cr
    Just though of correcting the message posted
    If the above clarifies pls assign points as a way to say thanks

  • MM Price Difference Account

    Hi,
    Can anyone tell me the treatement of MM price difference account in Controlling. According to me we need to create it as a cost element and capture to one cost center to track the price difference account and allocate it to production cost centers by way of assessment. Is it true.Please explain me in detail.

    Hi Prasanth,
    You can create Price Difference Account as a Cost Element and you must make a default Account Assignment in OKB9. You may need to create a Cost Center for this. So, whenever some amount gets posted to this GL, automatically same value will flow to that Cost Center and you can use any allocation method to transfer that value to different Production Cost Centers.
    Pls revert back for futher explanation...
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • PO Invoice price difference handling - accounting issues

    Hi,
    I am working for a distribution company that is selling right away the goods it bought. Therefore we first receive the goods before creating a PO and then receive the invoices from our suppliers later on.
    Very often, there are differences between the PO and Invoices and as per SAP standard configuration, any price differences between PO and invoice are booked straight into cost of sales while quantity differences are kept on balance sheet level.  However, we would like to be able to treat the price and quantity differences the same way (i.e. on balance sheet level and so not directly in Cost of Goods Sold).
    Do you know if there is a way to do so?
    Also, we would like to be able to distinguish the different type of errors that resulted into differences between the PO and invoice, and create different type of errors in order later to make different reports and analyses the causes. Can we do that with the SAP MM and FI/CO functions? How?
    Thank you in advance,
    Regards,
    Vic

    Proceed with posting Invoice, System blocks the Invoice. You need to manually remove the block for further processing.

  • Price difference on cancellation of production order confirmation

    Hi,
    We are having a material which is maintained at price control "S". We have created a production order for the material. In due course of business, we did confirmation for say 100 pcs of the material. However, immediatly on confirmation, we realized that we do not need to do the confirmation & hence we did the cancellation of the production order confirmation using CO13.
    On doing the production order confirmation cancellation, we observed that the system has posted some amount to "price difference account"
    We also observed that once in a while this kind of entries do get posted.
    It is requested to please let us know in why system is behaving this way?
    We have checked SAP Note no 216080 "Price difference when reversing GI for S-Priced material" & SAP Note no 215980 'Price difference during GR for the production order". However we are not convinced that these could be the reason for the price difference.
    Thanking you in anticipation
    Regards
    Santosh Kumar Agarwal

    Hi,
    Yes, you are correct in the understanding that the system creates quants in 914 when the production order confirmation is cancelled. But, it does not generate any TR or TO in the background to post the stock back into the original storage type.
    Can we not use the put away strategies so that the system determines where to place the material? My query is that despite all the configurations for automatic TO creation and confirmation for movement type 262, it does not generate a TO (or TR) in the background when a production order confirmation is cancelled using CO13.
    However, if I manually post a material using MB1A for 261 movement type and reverse it using 262, it generates a TO and confirms it as per the setting in configuration.
    The same thing does not work when we run it through PP (CO11N and then CO13).
    Any suggestions on how to approach this and where to check for missing configurations?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Gaurishankar

Maybe you are looking for