Problem in account determination_Intercompany billing

Dear Expert,
i am facing account determination problem in intercompany billing.
at the time of invoicing end customer billing system showing account determination error but in intercompany invoice
system not giving any error & document is posted properly.
error is Account 310100001 requires an assignment to a CO object
regards
ajit

You controlling object, i.e., cost center/element is missing.
Either you can default Cost Center into cost element using transaction KA02 under the Default account assignment tab in order this error to be discontinued.....later you can allocate cost to different cost center if wanted...
Or take the assistance of your FICO guy for this. As this totally depends on, where business wants to report this kind of expenses,If this is COPA then change FSG or else post to remaining appropriate cost objects like cost center,internal order etc.
For further assistance refer following link:
Account "XXXXX" requires an assignment to a CO object
Account 5248654 requires an assignment to a CO object---Message no. KI235
Thanks & Regards
JP

Similar Messages

Problem in Save the Billing Document

Hi,
We have a problem while saving the Billing Document i.e.
Document 83034087 saved (error in account determination)
Message no. VF051
when we saw it;s Revenue accounts, found there -
Condition type............Message.................Description
ZM05............................121.......................No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFI
Access     Message     Description
08     121     No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFI
10     121     No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFI
20     121     No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFI
30     121     No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFI
40     121     No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFI
50     121     No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFI
Plz guide...

Hello Anil.Sap321,
Your problem has to do with ACCOUNT DETERMINATION.
Step 1: Check which account determination procedure is assigned to your billing type i.e. SPRO>SD>Basic Functions> Account Assignment/Costing>Revenue Account Determination>Define and Assign Account Determination
HINT: normally, this is KOFI00 in standard sap
Step 2: Check the Condition Types in your account determination in the control data in the same path as in step 1 for the Definition (e.g. KOFI, KOFK)
Step 3: Check your accesses e.g. for KOFI (this should correspond to your VKOA tables). Here, you can see the sequence in which your accounts are determined. Plus, at field level you can see where the data are taken from and then you can check your master data etc. during troubleshooting.
Step 4: Identify in which combination your G/L should be in and you or your FI counterpart should configure the G/L in the designated VKOA table (transaction VKOA).
TIP: To know which G/L account you need to input, you need the help of Financial guys as different companies have their different set of G/Ls or Chart of Accounts.
Step 5: When this is configured in your VKOA, you can re-test. Look at your Revenue Account determination analysis to see if your "access" in which you made your VKOA entry is successfully read during account determination.
NOTE: The G/L you or your FI contact have configured must exist in the Company Code involved in your accounting process.
Good luck and let me know if this helps you,
Eva

Is Verizon unwilling or unable to fix problem with Account Owner(s)

A forum or Google search reveals several customers unhappy with how Verizon treats the account owners... count me as one. I'm sure there are many more customers who were equally unhappy but just accept Verizon's incompetence and complete the unnecessary gymnastics of un-registering accounts and then re-registering with a new username.
PROBLEM:
There are numerous scenarios that can cause a My Verizon account to have the Account Owner be listed with an incorrect telephone number. In my case, I had an account with AT&T and 3 additional numbers associated. As each account expired, I transferred the numbers to Verizon. The first account transferred was my 14yr old son. I registered a My Verizon account for management (my name & my userid) and eventually added the additional numbers, however, the Account Owner's phone number is listed as my son's cell.
Over the past 2 years (since I migrated to Verizon), I've had small problems with account notifications and other information being text to my son's cell. I've called numerous times and customer service says it's corrected, but eventually the problems return. Recently, I upgraded my phone and started using some new services like Backup Assistant and the fact that the Account Owner is associated with an incorrect number has caused even more trouble.
I simply want to keep my existing username for My Verizon and correct the cell phone number associated as the Account Owner. This should be extremely simple.
VERIZON'S SOLUTION:
"We can't do it". "Our systems don't allow us to make this change".
The Customer Service Department (or Lack of Customer Service Department) tells me that since they can't or are unwilling to do the necessary changes, their only solution is to force their customer to do their work. They will un-register the account and I can register again. There is no concern for the preferences of an existing customer (almost 3 years); there is no concern for the inconvenience caused to an existing customer who spends hundreds of dollars each month and thousands of dollars each year (I currently have 2 separate accounts with Verizon, 4 phones on my problem account and 4 phones on another for a total of 8 phones with data plans... do the math); there is no concern that I will now have to use a completely different username one that is no longer uniform with my other accounts; there is no concern that I will have to change any and all services that reference My Verizon. Quite simply... Verizon Wireless shows their Account Owners that they have no concern for us.
PROPER SOLUTION:
I have almost 25 years of Information Technology experience and over 3 years working with Call Centers (similar to Verizon's Customer Service), which explains in part why I find this so frustrating... the fix for this is SIMPLE!!! The real problem is that Verizon simply doesn't care enough to fix it because we are existing customers and not new customers.
Without going into specifics (nor could I since I don't have access to their systems), data for the My Verizon portal is contained within modifiable databases. These relational databases will be tied to other systems and other databases, but a modification of this type would just require that the portal be allowed to make the update to the appropriate field(s) within the appropriate database(s). If direct access is not attainable because of their design, it is still not too difficult to write an additional process to accommodate this change. These types of things are done everyday.
More importantly, even if Verizon was unable or unwilling to make these programming changes... I have no doubt that if Customer Service has an escalation process to their I.T. Department that a programmer with access to the application(s) and/or database(s) could easily make the change directly and almost immediately.
CONCLUSION:
Until now, my experience with Verizon has been mostly positive even to the point of recommending the carrier to friends and family. I've found their coverage area to meet my needs and the data speeds to be more than satisfactory. However, Verizon needs to remember that cellular service has essentially become a commodity and that customer retention is often based on other things than simply providing dial tone. With a monthly cell phone expense that rivals a car payment, I would think that Verizon would be more than willing to accommodate such a simple request to maintain a satisfied customer.
If you too are one of the many customers having issue with modifying the Account Owner, just resolve yourself that it appears Verizon is unwilling to make the simple correction to the My Verizon portal to satisfy our request.

I'm not 100% sure that I follow your reasoning, so please correct me if I misstate your opinions. I've numbered them so it will be easier to identify any mistakes I make.
1. Not allowing a user, customer service representative, or any Verizon representative to change the cell phone number associated with the Account Owner to another cell phone number on the same account is a security risk.
I'm not suggesting that I be allowed to change the name, social security number, or any other pertinent details related to establishing the original account. All the information pertaining to who is responsible for the bill remains the same with the single exception that the current associated cell phone number be changed to another number already listed on the account. In what possible manner is this a security risk? Frankly if the ability was enabled and someone either by mistake or incompetence made such a change the impact would simply be what I'm currently experiencing (inconvenience). Since in this hypothetical situation the ability to change this value is enabled, the "inconvenience" would easily be re-mediated by returning the value to its original state.
Furthermore, if there is some "security risk" that I'm over looking then an organization that is concerned about providing quality customer service would create procedures to accommodate customer requests and meet security requirements. Let's use a bank (with an obvious security vulnerability) and debit cards as an example. If I lose my debit card, I cannot go to my computer and print out a temporary debit card (very user friendly, but not secure). Some banks will allow you to go online and cancel the lost debit card while requesting a new one to be mailed to the address you have on file (user friendly and mostly secure). To solve this same problem at other banks might require you to go into the office and sign a form cancelling the lost debit card and confirming the address to mail you a new one (less user friendly, but highly secure). The Verizon equivalent, is me requesting that I add an existing bank account to my online banking and being told "We can't do it". However, because the bank cares so much about keeping me as a customer... they will delete my account, allow me to create another, possibly losing my historical data, have me change my username that I've been using for years, spend time adding all my online bill payments... all for the pleasure of staying their customer and getting to use their services as they should have been designed.
2. Making a software change that would allow users or CSR's to associate a different cell phone number on the account to the current Account Owner would be difficult and require downtime.
You give some time expounding this thought and I'm unaware of your web, application, and/or database experience... but I will try to address your concerns later. However, let's assume that you are correct and these changes will be difficult ("taking weeks to months"). The purpose of my post was whether Verizon was unwilling or unable to accommodate this customer request. You seem to be agreeing that Verizon is unwilling to make these changes, or at the very least, feel that Verizon has decided that the time and expense involved is of more importance than correcting an issue impacting their customers. I personally find the later equally disheartening as this has been an issue for many customers (you yourself mention experiencing the problem) and has been well documented through previous forum and Internet posts. Even by your estimations, if they had taken previous customer complaints seriously... this would have been fixed by now. Once again it seems the obvious answer is that Verizon may not consider customer service as an important factor as I do.
As far as your technology issues, I agree that more than a web page change would be required. I do take issue with comparing the change of a distributed application (operating system) that must be designed to support enumerable hardware components to the work required to makes changes to a web portal with a back-end in-house database. You could write an entire book detailing the differences between these two scenarios as they have very little in common, but I'll try to keep it focused to your points.
Coding
Coding an Operating System that must run on literally a multitude of hardware configurations and support an unending diversity of applications is an incredible endeavor and really never a finished product. Changes to an OS are constantly being made and the developers must consider hardware and software that they are not intimately familiar and occasionally even deal with 3rd parties to facilitate changes.
The change I'm advocating has a web component which would be replicated throughout their web server topology, however, these are items that Verizon's developers deal with routinely (if not daily). There are a very limited number of 3rd party concerns (a few different browsers, IE, Chrome, Mozilla & a disparate platforms such as PC, tablet, phone). A little research in the benefits of web portals (and cloud computing) verses distributed applications will clearly outline the drastic differences. A simple illustrative question (though maybe not a completely fair analogy) is how many people do you know who can code an operating system and how many people get on GoDaddy and create their own web pages. I'm not trying to insinuate that anyone who knows a little HTML can make the web portal changes, however, this isn't a difficult project for an experienced developer.
The bigger issues and ones that I alluded to in my original post are the changes that would be required to Verizon's back-end databases. The changes that would need to be made mostly likely involve multiple databases and assuming they are using a typical relational database design might require changes to key fields, adding new databases/tables, and exhaustive integrity checks. This isn't something that an average user could sit down and accomplish in an hour, however, these are simply the routine day-to-day duties of any professional database developer.
Again I reiterate... this change simply involves allowing someone (either a user, CSR, or other Verizon agent) to readily change an index record or records that correlates Account Owner to cell phone number. In terms of database management this should be simple.
Debugging & Deployment
The debugging/testing of changes made to an Operating System are amazingly complex for all the aforementioned reasons. The deployment of such changes is even more complex in that you've got to develop the mechanism to push these changes out to the entirety of the user community. I'll address deployment (or as you said dispersal) of this change because it's the easiest... quite simply there isn't one. The benefit of having a centralized web portal like My Verizon is that users come to you, not the other way around, and any change made will immediately be accessible by the user community. There is a deployment aspect in that My Verizon doesn't exist on a single web server, but again this is just the typical topology for a portal of this size and not relevant to our discussion. Debugging/Testing is an important aspect of any change and certainly Verizon has this methodology in place, however, I'll reiterate that this change should not be complex and shouldn't require extensive testing. We've also already discussed the fact that any debugging/testing only has to take place on a limited number of platforms.
Downtime
If adding the ability to change the relationship of the Account Owner to an associated cell phone number requires any downtime... the person responsible for Verizon's Development, Beta, and Production environments should be fired. There is simply no way this is even a possible concern. I've dealt with many companies with far less resources than Verizon and I assure you that changes of this nature would never require down time. I'm sure they have staff in place whose sole responsibility is to work on their continuity plan. This is a non issue.
Other Carriers
You can't possibly know how all carriers operate, though you may have some past experience with other companies. I would contend (and maybe I'm too optimistic) that a company with a focus on customer satisfaction when made aware of complaints and/or limitations in their service would seek to rectify the issue. It's quite possible that whatever other company you are referencing has fixed this issue if indeed it was similar... especially since I've hopefully bolstered my opinion that the resolution is not overly complicated.
Would you mind telling me if you deleted your 2 original comments to my post before I had an opportunity to answer? The reason I ask is that last night another user (jimfitzgerald) had posted a comment and I replied. He later posted a 2nd comment and while writing my response... all the posts were removed (his 2 posts, my reply, and your 2 posts). I'm curious if this was just a user withdrawal (though I really wish my response had remained in the thread), if there was some sort of technical issue with these forums last night, or if my response was deleted for cause by Verizon or other admin. Thanks!

BT Vision Account and Billing

If you need help with a BT Vision account or bill we have lots of billing information available online. This covers topics such as billing details, payment options and updating your details.
Retired BTCare Community Manager - StephanieG and SeanD are your new Community Managers
If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

Hi Folks,
I am tidying up our sticky threads so have decided to archive a few more. The links of the Sticky threads that I am archiving can be found below, just encase you want to view these again.
New IP Channels - 28-02-2014
System update on June 23rd - Problems with accessing or playing on demand programmes - 20-06-2014
System update on June 24th - Problems playing On Demand programmes - 20-06-2014
Temporary issue with BBC iPlayer - Issue resolved - 21-07-2014
Problems receiving local TV Channels - 24-02-2014
Sky Sports 5 launch on Vision+ box - 11-08-2014
National Freeview Retune - 3rd September 2014 - ‎01-09-2014
BT Vision - Fresh New Look - 11-09-2014
ITV Retune on Monday 2nd February - 30-01-2015
Cheers
Sean
BTCare Community Manager
If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
We are sorry that we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)

Have suddenly lost ability to connect to internet. Account and bills up to

I have suddenly lost ability to connect to the internet, include itunes and App Store. Account and bills up to up date. ANy assistance appreciated

I am having this problem as well. In the last week or two, my calendars haven't been syncing properly. Nothing goes updates to my main computer from the phone. Then in the last few days I could only access the internet sporadically, today not at all. No map showing in the gps, safari doesn't work, no weather... It says 'Safari could not open the page because the server stopped responding'. The 3G wheel is spinning and shows that there is service.
I reset my phone completely a couple of days ago, reset history/cache, etc in settings, have turned it off and on, etc with no change.

HT3552 I have been trying to download apps from the app store and every time it tells me there is a problem with my previous billing and direct me to put in new billing information and every time i do that it still will not let me download any apps.

I have been trying to download apps from the app store and every time it tells me there is a problem with my previous billing and direct me to put in new billing information and every time i do that it still will not let me download any apps.

Have a look here > http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1646

I have problem with account that i can't make update or buy from app store There is massage appear in my payment page that i must contact with i tunes support to complete this transaction Please help me to fixe this problem as soon possible Hany hassan 00

I have problem with account that i can't make update or buy from app store
There is massage appear in my payment page that i must contact with i tunes support to complete this transaction
Please help me to fixe this problem as soon possible
Hany hassan
0096597617317
0096596677186
Thank you

You need to Contact iTunes Support...
Apple Support iTunes Store Contact Us

Problem with Printing the Billing date...

Hi Experts...
Here im facing the problem in printing the billing date.
The scenario is as follows.
The posting date of Billing is 10.10.2008
The document date of Billing is also 10.10.2008.
At the time of printing the Billing document it is taking another date otherthan 10.10.2008,where it should be 10.10.2008.
What modifications should i do to rectify the problem.
Please advice.
Regards,
Y P.

Prasad,
Ask your ABAPer do debug and find out what date (Table-Field) is used in the Invoice Output program. You will know the reason and if you think that the date being used is incorrect, you can ask your ABAPer to change it to VBRK-FKDAT which is the billing date.
Chandan

Authorization problem with VF01 "Create Billing Documents"

Dear All,
We face following problem with VF01 "Create Billing Documents".
Transaction: VF01
User: Joe
Authorization of Joe:
     VKORG Sales Organization: A, B (authorization object V_VBRK_VKO)
     FKART Billing Type: 1, 2 (authorization object V_VBRK_FKA)
The objective for Joe:
   Joe is qualified to create bills in
      sales org A only for billing type 1 and in
      sales org B only for billing type 2.
   Joe should not be able to create bills for
      sales org A with billing type 2 and in
      sales org B with billing type 1.
How can we solve this problem?
We already searched for userexits without any success.
Any help or ideas are very appreciated.
Regards
Markus Wilhelm
Project Manager ERP

Dear,
There are standard authority-checks based on Sales organization (authorisation object V_VBRK_VKO) and/or Billing type (V_VBRK_FKA).
An option would be to create a new billing type, define specific authorisations and use the new billing type for these documents.
The bad thing is that you would also need a special (new) sales order type, because the billing document type is unique per sales order.
So maybe it is easier to have a different sales organization.
Another option would be to create a new authorization object and check it in the billing documents.
If you wish, you could modify program LV60A005 & LV60A006.
Then you might check various user/customer exits.
Some functions to check: EXIT_SAPLV60A_001/002,
EXIT_SAPLV60B_001 - 008, EXIT_SAPLV60B_010 - 011.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

TS3297 @My account when billing in new card,they told me to contact ITunes store support to complete my transaction...where should I go?

@My account when billing in new card,they told me to contact ITunes store support to complete my transaction...where should I go?

Click here and request assistance.
(79195)

Problems with accounting integration cProjects

Dear Sirs,
I have some problems with accounting integration between my cProjects 3.10 and my ECC 5.0 system. I have followed the steps in the configuration guide as good I as can. However when I create a project, and go the accounting tab I get the following error:
The project is unknown in Accounting
Message no.
DPR_FIN_GECCO006
Diagnosis
Etc..
In the Cockpit for Controlling Integration I can see the following error at the time the project is created, and a new similar error is created when the status is set to released replicated.
No company code could be determined. Message No IAOM_CPROJECTS001.
In this message there is a reference to the fact that the company code can be set in the assigned model order for CPR1. I have created such a model order with a reference to company code 0100 for CPR1. However this does not seem to do the job.
I seem to be stuck, as I have tried every possible and unpossible lead to get any further. Any input for someone with the knowhow is highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Jørgen Ruud

Hello Jørgen,
It sounds strange, normally after create a model order and assigned to the scenario CPR1, then the determination of company code should work.
logic: CPR1 -> model order -> company code
Would you please try the note 875275, if it can help.
In case that it does not help, you can eithter use the Badi method to set it hardly, or create a customer message to let SAP check it.
name of Badi DPR_FIN_GECCO_ATTR
code like following:
      ls_attribute-data_element     = space.
      ls_attribute-value            = '1000'.
      ls_attribute-field_name_orext = 'BUKRS'.
      ls_attribute-fldname_receiver = space.
      ls_attribute-struc_name_copa = space.
      ls_attribute-field_name_copa = space.
      ls_attribute-ext_attr_name    = space.
      ls_attribute-ext_attr_value   = space.
      INSERT ls_attribute INTO TABLE ct_attributes.
regards!
Zhenbo

Problem with Account determination

Hi all.
I have a problem with account determination when I change some data in Tcode VKOA.
For example:
I made changes in VKOA to determine G/L account 0000523201 and it worked it.
But in the account document the account that is displayed is different (0000501000) and I don´t know why.
I checked the Analysis Account Determination in VF03 and the system found the correct account in the access sequence, but I realized that there is a second line with the message G/L account in document 0000501000 . Where do I determine this account, or how Can I fix it ?
Thanks for any help.
Renato

Hi reanto
Check in VKOA all the G/L accounts for all the respective account keys. Also check wheather any provisional G/L account have been maintained or not. for any account key
Also check wheather twice if you have maintained for the same account key different G/L accounts
Regards
Srinath

CAn my account be billed for a new phone

can my account be billed for a new phone

Here is Verizon's FAQ regarding Bill To Account:
https://support.verizonwireless.com/faqs/Account%20Management/billing_to_account.html
Hope it helps answer your questions.

HT1918 Hello. i'm trying to Redeem my account with a 25GBP ITunes card and it says it must be used on a UK Store Front. Can someone help as my account is billed in USDollars

Hello. i'm trying to Redeem my account with a 25GBP ITunes card and it says it must be used on a UK Store Front. Can someone help as my account is billed in USDollars

What it's telling you is correct. Gift cards are valid only in the country in which the card was issued. You cannot use an iTunes card issued in the UK in a US iTunes Store account. Give or sell the card to someone who can use it in the UK.
Regards.

Can't connect to Facebook by app in settings. Problem finding account. No problem with app on home page

Can some one help me sort problem with Facebook app in settings. When I use app message says problem finding account re-enter password after doing this message says unable to connect to server. I have no problem using Facebook app on home pages.

maybe just a temporary issue with service. Should be working now.

Problem in account determination_Intercompany billing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for