Problem when I active update rule

Hi experts,
I have the following problem;
I have created updtes rules, but when I try active, change, display or delete the system tell me :
Infobject is not contained in the infocube.
Could you help me, please?
Thank you.

Hi,
The objects you are mapping in the update rule is deleted by you or someone else while you were creating update rule.
Start RSA1 again so that data targets will be refreshed, check the mapping and try to activate again.
Kams

Similar Messages

"Error when activating update rule" after changing ODS key

Hi Gurus,
I have problem when transporting in productive system an existing ODS & the update rule linked. The message is : "Error when activating update rule".
This is when i move one field from the key to a simple field of the ODS.
Before transporting requests, i deleted data in the ODS by right-click on ODS --> Request tab --> select the request --> click on delete....
I don't understand because i did the same in Qual environment and everything is OK : transport request & ODS loading...
Please help.....

Hello,
Please try to check/perform the following steps:
1- You must ensure for the update rule have mapping between infosources
   and ODS/CUBEs correct, this means that also these objects need
   to be of the same version in the source system of the transport as in
   target system.
2- Please ensure all infoobjects in the cube are active.Please
   reactivate all the objects again in source system.
3- Ensure all infoobjects are found in the communication structure.
4- Please try to collect the update rule via BW transport connection
   with the grouping option "only necessary objects" and then transport
   those objects again.
Could you please reactivate the infocube and its update rules again
and then create a new transport for this infocube and transport it
again.
Best regards,
Paula Csete

Error when activating update rules

Hi ,
0RT_C36 cube shows --- stock per weeek (ocalweek)
My requirement is on daily wise .
So i copy the standard one 0RT_C36 and add the 0cal day.In update rule 0calweek has the reference feild posting date For 0calday i mapped with the same feild posting date . Error has occured when activating the update rule . Error is' No component exists whith the feild sid_calweek_f.
Regards
chakra

Hi,
The Automatic conversion in the update rules helps us map 0CALDAY of Info source to 0CALWEEK of the cube. So it is not a problem with this mapping.
These type of problem occurs especially when we copied update rules. So what we have to do is checking all mappings for corectness in the mapping.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

Error when activating update rule

HI BI Expert,
The original transfer rule for 2LIS_11_VAITM was deleted accidently and I created new one and mapped with the existing infosource. The system always generates the following error at the time of transport to another client.
Error when activating update rule D1GOAPD9O0P9CFOY8KBSOUDFA
Activation of the update rules for ZO_SOP_1 ZT_SOP_SALO_ITM
IC=ZO_SOP_1 IS=ZT_SOP_SALO_ITM error when checking the update rules.
Would you kindly be able to suggest me what steps I need to take so as to correct this issue?
Thanks.

Hi,
When you say that update rule was accidently deleted, was that attached to transport request and transported to your QA & PRD at that time.
Because it may happen that, your old rules are still there in QA & PRD and the new rules are failing to overwrite that.
If it is the case, then you may have to open the client for QA & PRD and delete the existing update rule (doesnt sound good practice though), and then create a fresh update rule and transport.
Rgds,
Vikram.
Rgds,
Vikram.

Error when activating update rule after transporting to QA

Hi,
When we transport Info cubes and update rules along with Process chains. There are the following errors in Transport request(XXXXXXXX).
1. Error when activating update rule 22HSFD3ZMALU46LS0R8PRF2MW
IC=ZSDPCXY2 IS=2LIS_11_VAITM error when checking the update rules
2. Error when activating update rule 7NT4WIDPDCN2ERFDRXIGH95PM
IC=ZSDPCXY2 IS=2LIS_12_VCHDR error when checking the update rules
and etc.
Then we activated and saved all the erroneous update rules in another tranport request(YYYYYYYY) and again we transported alongwith the previous transport request(XXXXXXXX).
The last request(YYYYYYYY)was successfully tranported and still there are same errors in TR(XXXXXXXX).
Quick answers will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Vijay

Hi Vijay,
Next time you would have transport only (YYYYYYYY). Transport Request (XXXXXXX) was not required to be moved.
Normally Update Rule gets deactivated in QA when any changes to the CUbe/ODS are moved.
Thus either you can transport transport request for only active update rule to QA or activate your UR directly in QA system in case you have authorization to do that.
Regards,
Rohini

Error when activating update rules for R/3 training and event management

hi all,
when iam trying to activate update rules for training and event management cube it is giving fallowing error."IC=0PE_C01 IS=0HR_PE_1 error when checking the update rules
Message no. RSAU461".
please guide me how to solve this issue.
thanks & regards
Vamshi D Krishna

Hi Vamsi,
Have you followed the following document to implement HR ?
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a0780530-bf03-2b10-d5ad-e9e8a53def23

Error while activating update rule in Inventory

I was working with migration of datasource 2LIS_03_BF from 3.x to 7.0 in MM module.
Recieved an error while activating update rule 0RT_C17 2LIS_03_BF in Inventory module.
When I checked the routine ,it shows the following error.
Errror:E:The Dictionary structure or table "/BI0/PMAT_SALES" is either not active or does not exist.
I am not usre how to resolve this.
Kindly reply asap.

1. Activate the master data infoobject for 0MAT_SALES at info object level of RSA1
2. Replicate and Activate the data source once again by using the program > SE38 : RS_TRANSTRU_ACTIVATE_ALL
3. Then try to migrate you datasource and activate you update rules.
it may help you
Regards.
Rambabu

I'm getting this problem when trying to update my iphone 3gs it says that the iphone software could not be contacted and I went on youtube got some advise to go into my hard drive to fix the error I have nothing in my host file please help me if you can

I'm getting this problem when trying to update my iphone 3gs it says that the iphone software could not be contacted and I went on youtube got some advise to go into my hard drive to fix the error I have nothing in my host file please help me if you can this is all new to me.

Read this: iOS 4: Updating your device to iOS 5 or later
... oh I think it is a 3gs or a 3
This makes a difference. What does it say in Settings > General > About?

Performance problem when running a personalization rule

We have a serious performance problem when running a personalization rule.
The rule is defined like this:
Definition
Rule Type: Content
Content Type: LoadedData
Name: allAnnouncements
Description: all announcements of types: announcement, deal, new release,
tip of the day
If the user has the following characteristics:
And when:
Then display content based on:
(CONTENT.RessourceType == announcement) or (CONTENT.RessourceType == deal)
or (CONTENT.RessourceType == new release) or (CONTENT.RessourceType == tip
of the week)
and CONTENT.endDate > now
and CONTENT.startDate <= now
END---------------------------------
and is invoked in a JSP page like this:
<%String customQuery = "(CONTENT.language='en') && (CONTENT.Country='nl'
|| CONTENT.Country='*' ) && (!(CONTENT.excludeIds like '*#7#*')) &&
(CONTENT.userType ='retailer')"%>
<pz:contentselector
id="cdocs"
ruleSet="jdbc://com.beasys.commerce.axiom.reasoning.rules.RuleSheetDefinitio
nHome/b2boost"
rule="allAnnouncements"
sortBy="startDate DESC"
query="<%=customQuery%>"
contentHome="<%=ContentHelper.DEF_DOCUMENT_MANAGER_HOME%>" />
The customQuery is constructed at runtime from user information, and cannot
be constructed with rules
administration interface.
When I turn on debugging mode, I can see that the rule is parsed and a SQL
query is generated, with the correct parameters.
This is the generated query (with the substitutions):
select
WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.DOCUMENT_SIZE,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.VERSION,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.AUTHOR,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.CREATION_DATE,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.LOCKED_BY,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.MODIFIED_DATE,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.MODIFIED_BY,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.DESCRIPTION,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.COMMENTS,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.MIME_TYPE
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT
WHERE
((((WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'announcement'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'deal'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'new release'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = ''
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'tip of the week'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'press release'
AND (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'endDate'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE > '2001-10-22 15:53:14.768'
AND (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'startDate'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE <= '2001-10-22 15:53:14.768'
AND ((WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'language'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'en'
AND ((WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'Country'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'nl'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'Country'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = '*'
AND NOT (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'excludeIds'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE LIKE '%#7#%' ESCAPE '\'
AND (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'userType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'retailer'
At this moment, the server makes the user wait more than 10 min for the
query to execute.
This is what I found out about the problem:
1)When I run the query on an Oracle SQL client (We are using Oracle 8.1.7.0)
, it takes 5-10 seconds.
2)If I remove the second term of (CONTENT.Country='nl' ||
CONTENT.Country='*' ) in the custom query,
thus retricting to CONTENT.Country='nl', the performance is OK.
3)There are currently more or less 130 records in the DB that have
Country='*'
4)When I run the page on our QA server (solaris), which is at the same time
our Oracle server,
the response time is OK, but if I run it on our development server (W2K),
response time is ridiculously long.
5)The problem happens also if I add the term (CONTENT.Country='nl' ||
CONTENT.Country='*' )
to the rule definition, and I remove this part from the custom query.
Am I missing something? Am I using the personalization server correctly?
Is this performance difference between QA and DEV due to differences in the
OS?
Thank you,
Luis Muñiz

Luis,
I think you are working through Support on this one, so hopefully you are in good
shape.
For others who are seeing this same performance issue with the reference CM implementation,
there is a patch available via Support for the 3.2 and 3.5 releases that solves
this problem.
This issue is being tracked internally as CR060645 for WLPS 3.2 and CR055594 for
WLPS 3.5.
Regards,
PJL
"Luis Muniz" <[email protected]> wrote:
We have a serious performance problem when running a personalization
rule.
The rule is defined like this:
Definition
Rule Type: Content
Content Type: LoadedData
Name: allAnnouncements
Description: all announcements of types: announcement, deal, new release,
tip of the day
If the user has the following characteristics:
And when:
Then display content based on:
(CONTENT.RessourceType == announcement) or (CONTENT.RessourceType ==
deal)
or (CONTENT.RessourceType == new release) or (CONTENT.RessourceType ==
tip
of the week)
and CONTENT.endDate > now
and CONTENT.startDate <= now
END---------------------------------
and is invoked in a JSP page like this:
<%String customQuery = "(CONTENT.language='en') && (CONTENT.Country='nl'
|| CONTENT.Country='*' ) && (!(CONTENT.excludeIds like '*#7#*')) &&
(CONTENT.userType ='retailer')"%>
<pz:contentselector
id="cdocs"
ruleSet="jdbc://com.beasys.commerce.axiom.reasoning.rules.RuleSheetDefinitio
nHome/b2boost"
rule="allAnnouncements"
sortBy="startDate DESC"
query="<%=customQuery%>"
contentHome="<%=ContentHelper.DEF_DOCUMENT_MANAGER_HOME%>" />
The customQuery is constructed at runtime from user information, and
cannot
be constructed with rules
administration interface.
When I turn on debugging mode, I can see that the rule is parsed and
a SQL
query is generated, with the correct parameters.
This is the generated query (with the substitutions):
select
WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.DOCUMENT_SIZE,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.VERSION,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.AUTHOR,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.CREATION_DATE,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.LOCKED_BY,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.MODIFIED_DATE,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.MODIFIED_BY,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.DESCRIPTION,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.COMMENTS,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.MIME_TYPE
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT
WHERE
((((WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'announcement'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'deal'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'new release'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = ''
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'tip of the week'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'press release'
AND (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'endDate'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE > '2001-10-22 15:53:14.768'
AND (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'startDate'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE <= '2001-10-22 15:53:14.768'
AND ((WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'language'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'en'
AND ((WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'Country'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'nl'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'Country'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = '*'
AND NOT (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'excludeIds'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE LIKE '%#7#%' ESCAPE '\'
AND (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'userType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'retailer'
At this moment, the server makes the user wait more than 10 min for the
query to execute.
This is what I found out about the problem:
1)When I run the query on an Oracle SQL client (We are using Oracle 8.1.7.0)
, it takes 5-10 seconds.
2)If I remove the second term of (CONTENT.Country='nl' ||
CONTENT.Country='*' ) in the custom query,
thus retricting to CONTENT.Country='nl', the performance is OK.
3)There are currently more or less 130 records in the DB that have
Country='*'
4)When I run the page on our QA server (solaris), which is at the same
time
our Oracle server,
the response time is OK, but if I run it on our development server (W2K),
response time is ridiculously long.
5)The problem happens also if I add the term (CONTENT.Country='nl' ||
CONTENT.Country='*' )
to the rule definition, and I remove this part from the custom query.
Am I missing something? Am I using the personalization server correctly?
Is this performance difference between QA and DEV due to differences
in the
OS?
Thank you,
Luis Muñiz

I have a problem when ı want to update and restore my ipad for ios5 : an error occurred while restoring this ipad (-10), what can i do??

i have a problem when ı want to update and restore my ipad for ios5 : an error occurred while restoring this ipad (-10), what can i do??

Error -1 is not mentioned in this article about error messages during a restore process: http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3694
This one comes close:
The device could not be restored. An internal error occurred, or Error 3200: This indicates a network-connectivity or traffic issue. If you see this error, wait an hour or more and try again.
You may also check your security software settings, to make sure that iTunes can contact Apple servers during this process: iTunes for Windows: Troubleshooting security software issues

I am having problem when i am updating my iphone 4 to ios 5 ..it get update n took 50 minutes then at the end when it was processing file ...suddenly an error comes that an unknown error accurred {9006}..please help me..how will i update my iphone 4

i am having problem when i am updating my iphone 4 to ios 5 ..it get update n took 50 minutes then at the end when it was processing file ...suddenly an error comes that an unknown error accurred {9006}..please help me..how will i update my iphone 4

Error 9006: Following Troubleshooting security software frequently resolves this error. There may be third-party software installed that modifies your default packet size in Windows by inserting a TcpWindowSize entry into your Registry. Your default packet size being set incorrectly can cause this error. Contact the manufacturer of the software that installed the packet size modification for assistance.

Problems when trying to update the free version of Adobe Reader Updater 11.0.00 on Windows 8. There

Problems when trying to update the free version of Adobe Reader Updater 11.0.00 on Windows 8. There is something to fix.??

Have you tried http://ardownload.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/win/11.x/11.0.03/misc/AdbeRdrUpd11003.msp ?

Hello, I have a problem when I activated my iPhone, it says "Your iPhone could not be activated because the activation server is temporarily unavailable" and I tried wifi and iTunes ?

Hello, I have a problem when I activated my iPhone, it says "Your iPhone could not be activated because the activation server is temporarily unavailable" and I tried wifi and iTunes

opluffi9z wrote:
Hello, I have a problem when I activated my iPhone, ...
See this discussion.
https://discussions.apple.com/message/21189708

HT4623 my iphon 4s got problem when i was updating it and screen become black and there is a usb & itone icon on it it dose not work any more ..any feedback about this guys?

my iphon 4s got problem when i was updating it and screen become black and there is a usb & itone icon on it it dose not work any more ..any feedback about this guys?

Connect it to iTunes and restore it.

RSAU461, problem with activating update rules for cube 0csrv_c01

Hello,
I have added new fields to data source 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H, then changed transfer rules, added characteristics to ODS 0crm_proh, and reactivated update rules 80crm_proh. But now I have problem with second update rules for this cube named 80crm_cnfh. It is not active and all fields in it have red status, error RSAU461, and I cannot activate it.
What I should do? Should I change somehow that second source for data to my cube (change infosource, ods, rule?)
Regards
Radek

hi
As said by the Mti u have just changed the info objects in the ods and u need to map them with the specific info objects from the ods.
double click on the Update rules of the cube and go to the characteristic tab there map the newly added info objects with the IO in the ods.
Khaja

Problem when I active update rule

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for