Problem with accounts that has dots

We have this problem after migrating from tiger server.
If user has secondary uid with dot
(for example primary uid for john smith is johnsmith and secondary john.smith)
and tries to login using POP(with IMAP everything is OK) then system(CYRUS)
creates new blank mailbox john^smith.
So user don't get any error and can't receive mail because new messages located in mailbox johnsmith.
Removing dot from login solves the problem.
Is there any way to solve the problem because 10.4 does not have this issue.

forgot to mention, problem occurs only when logging to pop using uid alias that has dot(f.e. j.smith)

Similar Messages

I have problem with account that i can't make update or buy from app store There is massage appear in my payment page that i must contact with i tunes support to complete this transaction Please help me to fixe this problem as soon possible Hany hassan 00

I have problem with account that i can't make update or buy from app store
There is massage appear in my payment page that i must contact with i tunes support to complete this transaction
Please help me to fixe this problem as soon possible
Hany hassan
0096597617317
0096596677186
Thank you

You need to Contact iTunes Support...
Apple Support iTunes Store Contact Us

Problem with OracleParameter that has default value

I created Oracle procedure, that has parameters with default value (v_min_salary and v_max_salary)
create or replace procedure JOB_EDIT (
v_job_id in jobs.job_id%type,
v_job_title in jobs.job_title%type,
v_min_salary in jobs.min_salary%type:=null,
v_max_salary in jobs.max_salary%type:=null
is
begin
And when I run it from C# code I receive OracleException: "ORA-01008: not all variables bound" :
OracleConnection conn = null;
OracleTransaction tran=null;
try {
conn = new OracleConnection( ...here my connection string ... );
string strCmd = "begin job_edit(:v_job_id, :v_job_title, :v_min_salary, :v_max_salary); end;";
OracleCommand cmd = new OracleCommand(strCmd, conn);
cmd.Parameters.Add(new OracleParameter(":v_job_id", OracleType.VarChar, 10)).Value = jobRow.JOB_ID;
cmd.Parameters.Add(new OracleParameter(":v_job_title", OracleType.VarChar, 35)).Value = jobRow.JOB_TITLE;
// When I worked with Sql Server I did not add parameters with deafult value
// What I must to do with parameters v_min_salary and v_max_salary ?
conn.Open();
cmd.Transaction = tran = conn.BeginTransaction();
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
tran.Commit();
catch (OracleException ex) {
// here OracleException: "ORA-01008: not all variables bound"
tran.Rollback();
catch (Exception ex) {
tran.Rollback();
finally {
conn.Close();
What I must to do with parameters v_min_salary and v_max_salary ?

For best chances of getting a reply, you may want to post it to ODP.NET forum (ODP.NET

Flash player problems with PDF that has multi-media content (voice recordings).

Hi - I created a presentation in Presenter 9 that contains audio recordings, published it as a pdf and sent it to my client's offices all over the U.S., as well as Japan, Belgium, Germany, South America and France. No one has had an issue viewing/hearing the presentation except one office, located in California. When they try to open it, they get the following message:
"To view the flash technololgy content in this pdf file, please install the required version of flash player."
Because of the message, and the fact that everyone else can open the presentation, I think the issue is related to the version of Flash Player the CA office is using, and that it is not a "Presenter" problem. The operating system and software details are as follows:
Windows 7 Pro SP1, 64-bit
Internet Explorer 11.0.13, 32-bit
Adobe Reader XI Version 11.0.09
Acrobat 9 Pro Version 9.0.0
Adobe Flash Player 15 ActiveX
I would welcome any advice you might have. This is difficult for me to troubleshoot as I am not having the problem, my client is.
Thanks -
Susan

Pat -
Thank you so much for your response. I will give it a try.
Best regards,
Susan
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Pat Willener <[email protected]>

My itunes account was set up under an email account that has been deleted. I started a new itunes account but have the same device as with the old account. How do i keep my music thats on my ipod touch from being deleted when i sync it to my new account?

My itunes account was set up under an email account that has been deleted. I started a new i tunes account but have the same device as with the old account. How do i keep my music thats on my ipod touch from being deleted whin i sync it to itunes after purchasing new music?

I have the same problem (deleted email account). I think I mistakenly set up an account when I was buying an Apple product online, not realizing that it would be the same ID as my iTunes.
What is the way to actually contact Apple?
I have been clicking around in circles for hours! Will I have to pay them to resolve this? I don't have any products still have applecare . . .

•Install Photoshop Elements with an account that has administrative privileges

I will be upgrading to photoshop elements 12 and read that it was necessary to install photoshop elements with an account that has administrative privileges. I'm not sure how to do this.

Waltard wrote:
I guess I’m wondering if I upgrade to photoshop elements 12 whether the problem will continue with 12
There is no problem with any of the PSE versions. I have used version 10, version 11 and version 12 in trial mode and I didn't see any problems with any of them.
Your case is unique in that you have only one user account on the machine and so by default that account has all the privileges of an Administrator.
also, you don't need to uninstall anything; Version 10 and version 12 can work from your one machine. they are installed on separate folders so don't worry about having old version on your machine.
Just go ahead and install version 12. You can download a trial version of PSE12 and it has all the features and functions of the boxed version that you can buy from Amazon or some big name stores. After installing the trial version, you can use it for 30 days and by that time you will have made up your mind whether 12 is better for your need. If you like it, all you need to do is to buy the boxed version and use the serial number to activate what is already on your machine. You don't need to re-install it using the DVDs in the box.
Hope this helps.

I have a online form created with my paid account that has just stopped working.

I have a online form created with my paid account that has been working for months that just started displaying a message that starts "This form was easily created for FREE with FormsCentral. See how..." The inline frame that it shows up in has also changed to be very small. The form is set to open in FormsCentral and shows the message and inline frame size when I choose preview. What's up?

Checked when I got back in to work today and everything is working as it should. All of our online forms were screwed up yesterday, but are working this morning. I know this won't help anyone in the future, but just wanted to follow-up.

HT3702 i signed in with an account that has a 6.99 dollar purchased app and pressed install but i got billed for it it should of been free

i signed in with an account that has a 6.99 dollar purchased app and pressed install but i got billed for it it should of been free

We won't know until you try the procedure. The reset will not affect the content of the iPod.
Stedman

Is Verizon unwilling or unable to fix problem with Account Owner(s)

A forum or Google search reveals several customers unhappy with how Verizon treats the account owners... count me as one. I'm sure there are many more customers who were equally unhappy but just accept Verizon's incompetence and complete the unnecessary gymnastics of un-registering accounts and then re-registering with a new username.
PROBLEM:
There are numerous scenarios that can cause a My Verizon account to have the Account Owner be listed with an incorrect telephone number. In my case, I had an account with AT&T and 3 additional numbers associated. As each account expired, I transferred the numbers to Verizon. The first account transferred was my 14yr old son. I registered a My Verizon account for management (my name & my userid) and eventually added the additional numbers, however, the Account Owner's phone number is listed as my son's cell.
Over the past 2 years (since I migrated to Verizon), I've had small problems with account notifications and other information being text to my son's cell. I've called numerous times and customer service says it's corrected, but eventually the problems return. Recently, I upgraded my phone and started using some new services like Backup Assistant and the fact that the Account Owner is associated with an incorrect number has caused even more trouble.
I simply want to keep my existing username for My Verizon and correct the cell phone number associated as the Account Owner. This should be extremely simple.
VERIZON'S SOLUTION:
"We can't do it". "Our systems don't allow us to make this change".
The Customer Service Department (or Lack of Customer Service Department) tells me that since they can't or are unwilling to do the necessary changes, their only solution is to force their customer to do their work. They will un-register the account and I can register again. There is no concern for the preferences of an existing customer (almost 3 years); there is no concern for the inconvenience caused to an existing customer who spends hundreds of dollars each month and thousands of dollars each year (I currently have 2 separate accounts with Verizon, 4 phones on my problem account and 4 phones on another for a total of 8 phones with data plans... do the math); there is no concern that I will now have to use a completely different username one that is no longer uniform with my other accounts; there is no concern that I will have to change any and all services that reference My Verizon. Quite simply... Verizon Wireless shows their Account Owners that they have no concern for us.
PROPER SOLUTION:
I have almost 25 years of Information Technology experience and over 3 years working with Call Centers (similar to Verizon's Customer Service), which explains in part why I find this so frustrating... the fix for this is SIMPLE!!! The real problem is that Verizon simply doesn't care enough to fix it because we are existing customers and not new customers.
Without going into specifics (nor could I since I don't have access to their systems), data for the My Verizon portal is contained within modifiable databases. These relational databases will be tied to other systems and other databases, but a modification of this type would just require that the portal be allowed to make the update to the appropriate field(s) within the appropriate database(s). If direct access is not attainable because of their design, it is still not too difficult to write an additional process to accommodate this change. These types of things are done everyday.
More importantly, even if Verizon was unable or unwilling to make these programming changes... I have no doubt that if Customer Service has an escalation process to their I.T. Department that a programmer with access to the application(s) and/or database(s) could easily make the change directly and almost immediately.
CONCLUSION:
Until now, my experience with Verizon has been mostly positive even to the point of recommending the carrier to friends and family. I've found their coverage area to meet my needs and the data speeds to be more than satisfactory. However, Verizon needs to remember that cellular service has essentially become a commodity and that customer retention is often based on other things than simply providing dial tone. With a monthly cell phone expense that rivals a car payment, I would think that Verizon would be more than willing to accommodate such a simple request to maintain a satisfied customer.
If you too are one of the many customers having issue with modifying the Account Owner, just resolve yourself that it appears Verizon is unwilling to make the simple correction to the My Verizon portal to satisfy our request.

I'm not 100% sure that I follow your reasoning, so please correct me if I misstate your opinions. I've numbered them so it will be easier to identify any mistakes I make.
1. Not allowing a user, customer service representative, or any Verizon representative to change the cell phone number associated with the Account Owner to another cell phone number on the same account is a security risk.
I'm not suggesting that I be allowed to change the name, social security number, or any other pertinent details related to establishing the original account. All the information pertaining to who is responsible for the bill remains the same with the single exception that the current associated cell phone number be changed to another number already listed on the account. In what possible manner is this a security risk? Frankly if the ability was enabled and someone either by mistake or incompetence made such a change the impact would simply be what I'm currently experiencing (inconvenience). Since in this hypothetical situation the ability to change this value is enabled, the "inconvenience" would easily be re-mediated by returning the value to its original state.
Furthermore, if there is some "security risk" that I'm over looking then an organization that is concerned about providing quality customer service would create procedures to accommodate customer requests and meet security requirements. Let's use a bank (with an obvious security vulnerability) and debit cards as an example. If I lose my debit card, I cannot go to my computer and print out a temporary debit card (very user friendly, but not secure). Some banks will allow you to go online and cancel the lost debit card while requesting a new one to be mailed to the address you have on file (user friendly and mostly secure). To solve this same problem at other banks might require you to go into the office and sign a form cancelling the lost debit card and confirming the address to mail you a new one (less user friendly, but highly secure). The Verizon equivalent, is me requesting that I add an existing bank account to my online banking and being told "We can't do it". However, because the bank cares so much about keeping me as a customer... they will delete my account, allow me to create another, possibly losing my historical data, have me change my username that I've been using for years, spend time adding all my online bill payments... all for the pleasure of staying their customer and getting to use their services as they should have been designed.
2. Making a software change that would allow users or CSR's to associate a different cell phone number on the account to the current Account Owner would be difficult and require downtime.
You give some time expounding this thought and I'm unaware of your web, application, and/or database experience... but I will try to address your concerns later. However, let's assume that you are correct and these changes will be difficult ("taking weeks to months"). The purpose of my post was whether Verizon was unwilling or unable to accommodate this customer request. You seem to be agreeing that Verizon is unwilling to make these changes, or at the very least, feel that Verizon has decided that the time and expense involved is of more importance than correcting an issue impacting their customers. I personally find the later equally disheartening as this has been an issue for many customers (you yourself mention experiencing the problem) and has been well documented through previous forum and Internet posts. Even by your estimations, if they had taken previous customer complaints seriously... this would have been fixed by now. Once again it seems the obvious answer is that Verizon may not consider customer service as an important factor as I do.
As far as your technology issues, I agree that more than a web page change would be required. I do take issue with comparing the change of a distributed application (operating system) that must be designed to support enumerable hardware components to the work required to makes changes to a web portal with a back-end in-house database. You could write an entire book detailing the differences between these two scenarios as they have very little in common, but I'll try to keep it focused to your points.
Coding
Coding an Operating System that must run on literally a multitude of hardware configurations and support an unending diversity of applications is an incredible endeavor and really never a finished product. Changes to an OS are constantly being made and the developers must consider hardware and software that they are not intimately familiar and occasionally even deal with 3rd parties to facilitate changes.
The change I'm advocating has a web component which would be replicated throughout their web server topology, however, these are items that Verizon's developers deal with routinely (if not daily). There are a very limited number of 3rd party concerns (a few different browsers, IE, Chrome, Mozilla & a disparate platforms such as PC, tablet, phone). A little research in the benefits of web portals (and cloud computing) verses distributed applications will clearly outline the drastic differences. A simple illustrative question (though maybe not a completely fair analogy) is how many people do you know who can code an operating system and how many people get on GoDaddy and create their own web pages. I'm not trying to insinuate that anyone who knows a little HTML can make the web portal changes, however, this isn't a difficult project for an experienced developer.
The bigger issues and ones that I alluded to in my original post are the changes that would be required to Verizon's back-end databases. The changes that would need to be made mostly likely involve multiple databases and assuming they are using a typical relational database design might require changes to key fields, adding new databases/tables, and exhaustive integrity checks. This isn't something that an average user could sit down and accomplish in an hour, however, these are simply the routine day-to-day duties of any professional database developer.
Again I reiterate... this change simply involves allowing someone (either a user, CSR, or other Verizon agent) to readily change an index record or records that correlates Account Owner to cell phone number. In terms of database management this should be simple.
Debugging & Deployment
The debugging/testing of changes made to an Operating System are amazingly complex for all the aforementioned reasons. The deployment of such changes is even more complex in that you've got to develop the mechanism to push these changes out to the entirety of the user community. I'll address deployment (or as you said dispersal) of this change because it's the easiest... quite simply there isn't one. The benefit of having a centralized web portal like My Verizon is that users come to you, not the other way around, and any change made will immediately be accessible by the user community. There is a deployment aspect in that My Verizon doesn't exist on a single web server, but again this is just the typical topology for a portal of this size and not relevant to our discussion. Debugging/Testing is an important aspect of any change and certainly Verizon has this methodology in place, however, I'll reiterate that this change should not be complex and shouldn't require extensive testing. We've also already discussed the fact that any debugging/testing only has to take place on a limited number of platforms.
Downtime
If adding the ability to change the relationship of the Account Owner to an associated cell phone number requires any downtime... the person responsible for Verizon's Development, Beta, and Production environments should be fired. There is simply no way this is even a possible concern. I've dealt with many companies with far less resources than Verizon and I assure you that changes of this nature would never require down time. I'm sure they have staff in place whose sole responsibility is to work on their continuity plan. This is a non issue.
Other Carriers
You can't possibly know how all carriers operate, though you may have some past experience with other companies. I would contend (and maybe I'm too optimistic) that a company with a focus on customer satisfaction when made aware of complaints and/or limitations in their service would seek to rectify the issue. It's quite possible that whatever other company you are referencing has fixed this issue if indeed it was similar... especially since I've hopefully bolstered my opinion that the resolution is not overly complicated.
Would you mind telling me if you deleted your 2 original comments to my post before I had an opportunity to answer? The reason I ask is that last night another user (jimfitzgerald) had posted a comment and I replied. He later posted a 2nd comment and while writing my response... all the posts were removed (his 2 posts, my reply, and your 2 posts). I'm curious if this was just a user withdrawal (though I really wish my response had remained in the thread), if there was some sort of technical issue with these forums last night, or if my response was deleted for cause by Verizon or other admin. Thanks!

"Unable to update, log in with account that purchased app"

Hi
I get this error: "Unable to update, log in with account that purchased app" more or less, when trying to update apps on my other macbook pro. I *am* logged in with the account that purchased the apps; I ONLY purchase apps from apple's app store (iOS and MacOS) with one account and one set of banking details. I *do not* have more than one account with apple AT ALL.
Please can someone at apple remedy this bug?
It seem related to the fact that I upgraded the hard disk on the machine that is complaining; it seems to no longer recognise the machine in question. It allows me to purchase and install new apps, but NOT upgrade/update.

Ok, here's the latest update on this problem.
I tried to open an app that had been downloaded and I tried to do an in-app purchase (specifically, the FreeMemory app upgrade). Since it was a new hard disk, the computer asked me to authenticate the app against the app store; in other words, the anti-piracy thing kicked in. Then, when I gave my MAS password, the MAS asked me to verify my billing details. Thereafter, it allowed me not only to run the app and do the in-app purchase, BUT it stopped complaining about updates not being permitted with this account.
So maybe this is a bug Apple needs to pay attention to: viz., if the hard disk is new and you think the app store details are faked, ask the user to verify billing details straight away rather than leaving them in the dark as to why they think they're logged in, but they're not authenticated fully, and wondering why they can't update.
I will monitor the situation, and if any further problems come up, I will report them here, but for now, this seems to have fixed it.

Problems with accounting integration cProjects

Dear Sirs,
I have some problems with accounting integration between my cProjects 3.10 and my ECC 5.0 system. I have followed the steps in the configuration guide as good I as can. However when I create a project, and go the accounting tab I get the following error:
The project is unknown in Accounting
Message no.
DPR_FIN_GECCO006
Diagnosis
Etc..
In the Cockpit for Controlling Integration I can see the following error at the time the project is created, and a new similar error is created when the status is set to released replicated.
No company code could be determined. Message No IAOM_CPROJECTS001.
In this message there is a reference to the fact that the company code can be set in the assigned model order for CPR1. I have created such a model order with a reference to company code 0100 for CPR1. However this does not seem to do the job.
I seem to be stuck, as I have tried every possible and unpossible lead to get any further. Any input for someone with the knowhow is highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Jørgen Ruud

Hello Jørgen,
It sounds strange, normally after create a model order and assigned to the scenario CPR1, then the determination of company code should work.
logic: CPR1 -> model order -> company code
Would you please try the note 875275, if it can help.
In case that it does not help, you can eithter use the Badi method to set it hardly, or create a customer message to let SAP check it.
name of Badi DPR_FIN_GECCO_ATTR
code like following:
      ls_attribute-data_element     = space.
      ls_attribute-value            = '1000'.
      ls_attribute-field_name_orext = 'BUKRS'.
      ls_attribute-fldname_receiver = space.
      ls_attribute-struc_name_copa = space.
      ls_attribute-field_name_copa = space.
      ls_attribute-ext_attr_name    = space.
      ls_attribute-ext_attr_value   = space.
      INSERT ls_attribute INTO TABLE ct_attributes.
regards!
Zhenbo

Problem with Account determination

Hi all.
I have a problem with account determination when I change some data in Tcode VKOA.
For example:
I made changes in VKOA to determine G/L account 0000523201 and it worked it.
But in the account document the account that is displayed is different (0000501000) and I don´t know why.
I checked the Analysis Account Determination in VF03 and the system found the correct account in the access sequence, but I realized that there is a second line with the message G/L account in document 0000501000 . Where do I determine this account, or how Can I fix it ?
Thanks for any help.
Renato

Hi reanto
Check in VKOA all the G/L accounts for all the respective account keys. Also check wheather any provisional G/L account have been maintained or not. for any account key
Also check wheather twice if you have maintained for the same account key different G/L accounts
Regards
Srinath

Problem with Spaces that started with Snow Leopard

I've noticed two problems with Spaces that have arrived since switching to Snow Leopard... First, if I am in say Space 1 where I use Safari and I then want to move over to an open application, say like Excel, that I have running in Space 4, there are a number of ways to get there but one way I used to use all the time was to move down to the Dock and simply single click on the open Excel application and that would immediately switch me over to Space 4 and whatever Excel documents were already open there... Now, since switching to SL, a single click of whatever application in the Dock makes that application active in the Finder (you see its name appear in the upper left of the menu bar) but otherwise nothing happens... You then have to click a second time and then you switch over to Space 4... It's not really a double click because that implies to clicks closely spaced in time... For this, you can click once, leave the room, come back, click a second time and you will now switch to the alternate space where the open application is running... That is clearly different than it was under Leopard and I would suggest that it is a bug because there is no value in the outcome of that first click... It highlights the switched application but doesn't actually switch to it until you click a second time...
Second, and this one is worse, if you say launch Excel (which you want to open in Space 4) while you are in Space 1, Excel will open and switch over to Space 4... So far so good... But now, with Excel open over in Space 4, if you are now back and working in Space 1 and while there you use the Finder to go to some other, currently unopened, Excel file and request that it open, it should switch over to Space 4 and open that file but instead it opens it wherever you are, in the case mentioned here, in Space 1... So now you have Excel files opened both in Spaces 1 and 4... Clearly a bug... Spaces had some similar issues in a few early versions of Leopard but they eventually got it working... Now it appears Spaces has regressed somewhat in SL... I love spaces and use it all the time... Hope it gets fixed soon... thanks... bob...

Hi... I have since learned that the first paragraph of my original post where I say,
"I've noticed two problems with Spaces that have arrived since switching to Snow Leopard... First, if I am in say Space 1 where I use Safari and I then want to move over to an open application, say like Excel, that I have running in Space 4, there are a number of ways to get there but one way I used to use all the time was to move down to the Dock and simply single click on the open Excel application and that would immediately switch me over to Space 4 and whatever Excel documents were already open there... Now, since switching to SL, a single click of whatever application in the Dock makes that application active in the Finder (you see its name appear in the upper left of the menu bar) but otherwise nothing happens... You then have to click a second time and then you switch over to Space 4... It's not really a double click because that implies to clicks closely spaced in time... For this, you can click once, leave the room, come back, click a second time and you will now switch to the alternate space where the open application is running... That is clearly different than it was under Leopard and I would suggest that it is a bug because there is no value in the outcome of that first click... It highlights the switched application but doesn't actually switch to it until you click a second time... "
...that turned out to be my mistake... In another post someone pointed out that in Spaces preferences you must have checked ON the preference that says,
"When switching to an application, switch to a space with open windows for the application"...
I had been playing with a number of things trying to figure out what was going on and somewhere in the mix had switched that off... (It is on on all my other computers and I'm sure it originally was on this one too)... When I switched it back on the above described problem went away... So that was my fault...
But the second part,
"Second, and this one is worse, if you say launch Excel (which you want to open in Space 4) while you are in Space 1, Excel will open and switch over to Space 4... So far so good... But now, with Excel open over in Space 4, if you are now back and working in Space 1 and while there you use the Finder to go to some other, currently unopened, Excel file and request that it open, it should switch over to Space 4 and open that file but instead it opens it wherever you are, in the case mentioned here, in Space 1... So now you have Excel files opened both in Spaces 1 and 4... Clearly a bug... "
...is a real problem... I fired up my G4 (power pc) that runs Leopard, 10.5.8, to see whether it behaves the above way or not and it does NOT... It works as one would expect.. So at least later in Leopard, the above mentioned problem was not present but it is in this first incarnation of Snow Leopard...
To me, the utility of Spaces is all about keeping a single desktop from being cluttered with many open applications/files and to now have an application that opens in whatever space you happen to be in after it is first opened in its "correct" space sort of defeats the idea behind Spaces... I am currently trying to train myself to first hit <command><4> (my Excel space) before opening a second or subsequent Excel document to prevent it from opening somewhere where I don't want it to be...
Again, I hope Apple sees and fixes this... I did submit an "Apple feedback" item for this issue... thanks... bob..

Authorize purchased itunes store music with account that no longer exists

I recently moved my library over to another computer. Although half of my purchased music from the itunes library was purchased on a different account than the one i currently have. They were purchased on an account that has been deleted, and i therefore cannot authorize those songs with that account. I cannot play/burn or put on my ipod 928 songs that i purchased off the itunes store.
how can i authorize these songs?
Thank you for your time and attention, much appreciated.

Click here and use the form to request assistance.
(47884)

I can't figure out how to log off of my daughter's iTunes account that has been loaded to my PC. When I want to sync my iPhone, I get her data, not mine.

I can't figure out how to log off of my daughter's iTunes account that has been loaded to my PC. When I want to sync my iPhone, I get her data, not mine.

Hi, Abril_Perez17.
This may be related to a new feature embedded in iOS7 that shows all purchased music by default. Go to Settings > Music, then turn off Show All Music. See if the issue ceases once the feature has been disabled. This information is located on page 63 of the user guide below.
iPhone User Guide
Regards,
Jason H.

Problem with accounts that has dots

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for