Problem with purchase order history

Hi,
i have the following problem
I create a service purchase order for the quantity of 36000 and amount of 1350 (0.0375 per unit)
Step 1:
I entered a service entry sheet:
quatity: 17800
Value: 667.5
The system create a 101 for the amount of 667.5. Then i reversed the entry service trough movement 102 and i deleted the service entry sheet.
Step 2:
I repeated the step 1 but  for the quantity of 17500 and the amount of 656.25.
Step 3: Finally i entered a service entry sheet for the quantity of 9000 and the amount of 337.5 (9000*0.0375)
An error ocurred on the purchase order history. The lerf (service entry sheet, appear for the total amount of the PO: 1350 and the WE 101 for the amount of the service entry sheet: 337.5 (9000*0.0375)
I want to know why the system entered the service entry sheet for the total value (360000.0375) when i did it just for 337.5 (90000.0375)
Thanks in advance for your help.
Enzo.

Thanks, but i dont understand what your are trying to explaim me
The problem is when I enter a Service entry sheet trough ML81N the system should generate a 101 for the same value. It doesn´t happend.
In purchase order, the service entry sheet is for the amount of the Lerf created but the 101 (should generate automatically) is for the total of the purchase order.
I dont know why its happend
Thanks in advance for your help
Enzo

Similar Messages

  • Problem with purchase orders and cancelling order lines

    Hi,
    We have a problem with purchase orders and cancelling order lines. For example we have created PO no. 4300291277:
    We have made a GR 5000186897 on 03.09.2010 amount 1.920 and tried to cancel it with GR 5000208866, but it takes the invoice amount 1.724 instead of 1.920. What is the correct way to undo this orders, so we cancel the 1.920 and not the 1.724?
    Please help me, your help will be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Najma.

    hi,
    You have to cancel the IR first...and then do cancel the GR...
    yes, there will be diff. in the price(if the price changes in bwtn)..if no changes in the price , the price will taken as old one..
    Process:
    1. Cancel IR
    2. Then cancel GR..
    3. then go the PO and try to delete the line item..
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Problem with Purchase orders

    Hi, all!
    Please help me,
    We have SRM 5.0 the Extended Classic Scenario, from shopping cart through Carry out Sourcing we create the purchase order (PO) then purchase order replicated to the backend system. When I'm creating the purchase order I delete the one item of a five item in the PO through Delete Pushbutton then to hold the PO after that to order the PO. In the Application Monitors Backend application to give a process error: Item 0002 does not exist.
    Best regards,
    Guzal.

    Hi
    <b>Please go through this -></b>
    PO not getting created in the backend
    <u>Please check OSS note 1052999, OSS Note 1035220</u>
    Re: Problem with SRM Service PO's
    Re: SRM PO Deletion
    <u>I think that deleting line item PO is not enough. All PO has to be deleted. Make sure that PR or SC history does not contain any follow on document else system will interpret this a close PR or SC.</u>
    <b>PO Status not set to Deletion</b>
    PO status not set to Deletion
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Problem with Purchase Order receipt - Urgent

    Hi all,
    Scenario - A purchase order with a six items has been released, four items have been recieved, fifth item was deleted & sixth item is packing & forwarding charges.
    Problem - A change was done in the Mtl master for the packing & forwarding charges to ensure that a GR is not required for this item, but the same is not being reflected, as a query of Open PO's still shows this PO as open with the item packing & forwarding not received. How to resolve this?
    Vivek

    Stephen & Seema,
       From your inputs i did get some picture, but here is more details about the problem am facing, maybe you can help me out with this,
    The item packing & forwarding chgs has been declared as a material & in the BD-1 view of the Mtl Master, the General Item Category Grp has been set as 'Service w/o Dlvy' & this is causing the GR not to be ticked in the PO & hence it still says item yet to receive. I subsequently changed the status of Gen Itm Category to 'Service w/o Dlvy Confimration' & this ticks the GR. But the issue is, since the change in Material Master is done after the PO release, it is not changing the status in that PO.
    And the query i am runing to check the open PO's is a customised query developed using SQ01.
       Hope you are clear of my problem now & let me know what i can do

  • Problem with purchase order release strategy

    Hi Guru's
        i am dealing with problem of  service purchase order release strategy , when i making the service  po ,  i am not giving any over fulfillment tolerance  ,  after release & making Service entry sheet of PO ,   when i go to the change mode and change
      over fulfillment tolerance say 90%  , system allow me to make , and not applying release  strategy again  ,  so  there can be a miss use of this Scenario ,  so is there any possibility that release strategy , will appear again when change the tolerance ,
    0r  any other idea from your side , to avoid this ,
      your suggestions are really always helpful to me ,  please guide me for this also
    Thanks & regards
    Neha

    Hi Neha,
    A reset of the release strategy only takes place if
    -  the changeability of the release indicator is set to '4' in
       case of a purchase requisition and '4' or '6' in case of
       another purchasing document (purchase order, request for
       quotation, contract, scheduling agreement),
    -  the document is still subject to the previous release
       strategy,
    -  the new TOTAL NET ORDER VALUE is higher than the old one.
    The total net order value is linked to CEKKO-GNETW for a purchase order,
    CEBAN-GSWRT for a purchase requisition item-wise release and CEBAN-GFWRT
    for a purchase requisition overall release.
    If you have maintained a Tolerance for value changes during release
    (V_161S-TLFAE), the release strategy is reset when the value of the
    document is higher than the percentage you have specified and if the
    document is still subject to the previous release strategy.
    Review the SAP note 365604 and 493900 for more
    information about Release strategy.
    Regards,
    Ashwini.

  • Problem with Purchase Order

    Hello friends,
    I have a problem during creating a PO also PO requisition. During my work, the system is reporting this error message:
    "Budget for all Years under year-based commitment update of value type Purchase order".
    I thing the problem is caused by some wrong year end closing activities or by the budget.
    I am hopeless. Thanks for your help,
    Charlie

    Hi Charlie,
    What is missing is either the budget for the WBS element or Cost Object on which the PO is being raised has not been loaded into SAP and if it has been loaded, it is probably not released yet. Therefore, you would have to get in touch with your Finance Department for them to load and release the budget via Investment Management(IM) module(if used by your company).
    Once the plan is loaded, use transaction code <b>IM34</b> to rollup the plan. Next, use transaction code <b>S_ALR_87012812</b> to check the result of your rollup. Use transaction code <b>IM32</b> to copy the view across so that you can see the Annual view. Then use transaction code <b>IM52</b> to distribute to Level 2 WBS and <b>CJ30</b> from Level 2 to Level 3. Finally, use transaction code <b>CJ32</b> to release the budget. You can then run report <b>CN41</b> to look at the overall picture of the budget and the released amount.
    It is after this has been completed that you can now start raising PO on the cost objects.
    I hope the above helps.
    Do not forget to award the points please.
    Regards,
    Jacob

  • Problem with Purchase Order Smartform

    Hi All,
    I have a problem with SRM PO form.
    I have 2 PO Layouts 1 is for NA(North America) and 2 is for UK. In config the NA PO is configured for all mediums(Print, Mail And FAX).
    Using the BADI 'BBP_OUTPUT_CHANGE' I am overwriting config form (NA) with UK form. IF I preview the form in portal I can able to see the UK form for UK purchase orders. If I try to send a mail I am still getting the old form i.e NA form which is assigned in Config as an attachment in mail.
    Is anybody got the same issue? Please help me to sort out this issue..
    Thanks,
    Usman.

    Hi Sanjeev,
    Thanks for answere. Conditional triggering in SPRO is not useful, We have tried this option also.
    I am not doing first preview and next sendinq the mail. Doing only one action at atime.
    The BADI which u mentioned is not there(bbp_output_change_sf). I am using this BADI 'bbp_output_change'.
    Thanks,
    Usman Sued
    Edited by: Usman Syed on Mar 13, 2009 8:40 AM
    Edited by: Usman Syed on Mar 13, 2009 8:40 AM

  • Problem with Purchase Order creation with Random numbers .

    Hi Experts
    Currently i am facing an issue with Bapi BAPI_PO_CREATE1 to create Purchase order with random numbers for example items 1, 3,5.
    Please let me know the settings .
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi Neha,
    A reset of the release strategy only takes place if
    -  the changeability of the release indicator is set to '4' in
       case of a purchase requisition and '4' or '6' in case of
       another purchasing document (purchase order, request for
       quotation, contract, scheduling agreement),
    -  the document is still subject to the previous release
       strategy,
    -  the new TOTAL NET ORDER VALUE is higher than the old one.
    The total net order value is linked to CEKKO-GNETW for a purchase order,
    CEBAN-GSWRT for a purchase requisition item-wise release and CEBAN-GFWRT
    for a purchase requisition overall release.
    If you have maintained a Tolerance for value changes during release
    (V_161S-TLFAE), the release strategy is reset when the value of the
    document is higher than the percentage you have specified and if the
    document is still subject to the previous release strategy.
    Review the SAP note 365604 and 493900 for more
    information about Release strategy.
    Regards,
    Ashwini.

  • Problem with Purchase Order / Dealer

    Hello,
    I have a problem on the dealer on a purchase order.
    I have a PO containing severals items, if I delete one of them. I obtain the message on the portal : 'Enter no more than one partner of type Dealer' .
    The dealer is still identical on every items (deleted or not), and there is a display error (the function 'Dealer' appear once, and appears a second time without the first column).
    Does anybody have the same problem? How can I fix it?
    Thank you for the answer.

    Hi
    Check whether the PO is locked either in SM12 or table bbp_wflock. If so, delete the entry and try again.
    Thanks
    Suku

  • Problem with Purchase Order Form - SAPscript

    I have a custom purchase order form (Z_MEDRUCK) created using SAPscript. The address paragraph looks like this:
    ADDRESS PARAGRAPH AS
       TITLE        &LFA1-ANRED&
       NAME         &LFA1-NAME1&, &LFA1-NAME2&
       STREET       &LFA1-STRAS&
       LOCATION     &STR_SUPPL1&
       POBOX        &LFA1-PFACH& CODE &LFA1-PSTL2&
       CITY         &LFA1-ORT01&, &LFA1-ORT02&
       POSTCODE     &LFA1-PSTLZ&
       COUNTRY      &LFA1-LAND1&
       REGION       &LFA1-REGIO&
       FROMCOUNTRY  &T001-LAND1&
    ENDADDRESS
    When the Purchase Order Form is printed, if a POBOX exists, it is used instead of the STREET.  I did not write the SAPscript or any code involved with it.  I would like the POBOX to only be used if a STREET does not exist. 
    Where would the logic to use POBOX exist?  I have stepped through ME_PRINT_PO and have found nothing. Any ideas?
    Thank You.

    After the word ADDRESS, add DELIVERY.  This should make a physical street address take priority.
    ADDRESS DELIVERY PARAGRAPH AS

  • Problem with Purchase order (requisition)

    Hello friends,
    I have a problem during creating a PO also PO requisition. During my work, the system is reporting this error message:
    "Budget for all Years under year-based commitment update of value type Purchase order".
    I thing the problem is caused by some wrong year end closing activities or by the budget.
    I am hopeless. Thanks for your help,
    Charlie

    If you getting reqs against the internal order then it is related to controlling mans you have to check the settings for controlling which i have suggeted

  • Problems with Purchase order

    Hello Guys , I´m trying to create a stock transfer using a "stock transfer order" using  t-code me27 and the material is a stock material  and  has CS "Case" marked as Unit of measure for the order unit but when I try to save my purchase order it change the unit to "CAM " (CAM is another unit that I use for this material )What Can I check please?.

    Hi,
    Check the Unit of Measure in Basic data 1 and the Alternate UOM in the Additional Data.
    There should be some mismatch.
    Aktar

  • Problem with Purchase Order (PO) script

    Hi all,
    I am having a problem in my PO layout.
    In my layout when I take the print preview of the layout  for Purchasing Organization PAPL it shows me the Info record Text for only first item whereas it does not show it for other line items.
    However when I double-click on the particular line item without changing any data of the PO,  and take print preview again it shows me the info record text for the first item and the line item I double clicked.
    I am using the include statement
    /: INCLUDE &TEXT& OBJECT EKPO ID F02 LANGUAGE EN PARAGRAPH P3 to fetch the info record text.
    Here &TEXT& is PO number + Line item in concatenated form.
    Also this does not happen for any other Purchasing  Organization.
    Please help.
    Thanks
    Yatin

    Stephen & Seema,
       From your inputs i did get some picture, but here is more details about the problem am facing, maybe you can help me out with this,
    The item packing & forwarding chgs has been declared as a material & in the BD-1 view of the Mtl Master, the General Item Category Grp has been set as 'Service w/o Dlvy' & this is causing the GR not to be ticked in the PO & hence it still says item yet to receive. I subsequently changed the status of Gen Itm Category to 'Service w/o Dlvy Confimration' & this ticks the GR. But the issue is, since the change in Material Master is done after the PO release, it is not changing the status in that PO.
    And the query i am runing to check the open PO's is a customised query developed using SQ01.
       Hope you are clear of my problem now & let me know what i can do

  • Purchase Order history is not updated with Invoice number

    Hello Experts ,
    Please suggest some inputs/solution for my problem.
    Scenarios is :
    PO --> SO --> Invoice
    I am creating the invoice with the medium EDI , when I click on Save button IDOC is generated with the message " IDoc 'xxxxxxxxxxxxx' was created and forwarded for transmission " and it showing the status as 03 i.e, The IDoc was sent to an R/3 System or an external program via a transactional RFC ...but the problem is if I got to the Purchase Order history Its not updated with the Invoice number.
    What could be the problem , please suggest.

    Hi!
    I'm not sure, in which process you link PO and SO. There are some different ways, which are totally different scenarios - if you need help here, describe more detailed.
    Your invoice is probably only created with reference to SO, so check the invoice itself. In this case also the SO history should include the invoice.
    Regards,
    Christian

  • Purchase Order History not appearing for Purchase Order with service items

    A purchase order with a service item has been created.  A SES has been created and Miro transactions as well. When tcode ME2L is executed, the Purchase Order History field is blank. Any configuration missing or is there an applicable OSS note to fix  this?

    Hi,
    It is a coding error.
    Could you please check if you have applied the note 1049031 with the latest version 13?
    Regards,
    Edit

Maybe you are looking for