Problem with Sales BOM

Hello All,
The problem is related to Sales BOM where in the Item Category Group we maintain ERLA and the free item gets populated with the main item in the sales order with a different item category and the pricing is shown as statistical.
Now I want the system to show any error message or stop the next proceeding whenever the stock of the free item alongwith the main item or viceversa is not available or if there is any partial availability in case of free item & main item or viceversa.
Please suggest how to configure this or if any routine or user-exit need to be maintained for this.
Thanks & Regards
Priyanka Mitra

hi
check the Sale order User Exit and code your logic and make use of it

Similar Messages

3rd Part Dropship Scenario with Sales BOM

Hi
We have a 3rd Party Dropshipment scenario with Sales BOM with susequent Debit
Characteristics of Sales BOM
Sales BOM is created
Header Material is Valuated but non-inventorised (Accounting and costing view should exist)
Component Material is Valuated and inventorised
In Sales order, Pricing is done at the header material not at the components level
During Billing we get the COGS for the header material (cost coming from VPRS)
No VPRS exist at component level instead we have copy of VPRS just to capture the value in COPA for our reporting
Process
1. Sales Order created with Sales BOM exploded in sales order.
2. At the Item level Purchase requisition is created.
3. PR for the components is converted to PO
4. Vendor Delivers the components to Customer.
5. Statistical GR done in our system.
6. Invoicing is done in MIRO
7. We directly do the Billing. Billing is created at header level. Revenue and COGS is reported at Header level only.
We are stuck when we are doing the Subsequent Debit (can be for any unplanned cost). For Susequent Debit we are not able to report differential COPA at header level.
Normally whenever you do subsequent debit in case of 3rd party dropship for normal material, COPA document automatically attached to Billing. This is happening because of the behaviour of VPRS condition type. In our case VPRS only exists at header level and not at component level but replenishment is for components. Subsequent debit is also happening at component level. We need it to be reported at header level.
We need some solution to this.
Please advise
Regards
Neeraj
Edited by: NEERAJ BHARDWAJ on Dec 2, 2011 5:12 AM

Hi Raj,
Please clarified your requirement here, you mention that you wanted to valuated COGS at actual cost of PO? That sound more like actual costing here and what is the reason for this requirement?
Is this MTO with variant configuration?
If this is MTO with VC, Yes - we do cost Sales Order and here is the brief steps:-
Price Control S
a) Sales Order Creation - Normally when you save this will be costed and marked automatically. Note that condition type EK02 will represent the cost here
b) Run MRP based on Sales Order requirement which resulting planned orders, PR, etc
c) Convert PR-PO, Planned Order -> Production Order
d) Confirmations, GR on PO which valuated according to the SCE Costing in step a)
e) PGI will be based on the GR value on step d) which is also your SCE Costing
f) Any variance between PO and SCE need to be settle.
Thanks,
Ong Yang Lim

Problem with sales order and Service order

Dear Guru's
We have a real problem with sales orders and service orders and how we treat these. For a project that uses a WBS, it's not a problem to manipulate SAP to give us a list of shortages (orders with no or limited supply) for each order, but for some reason our after sales orders and our service orders do not work this way.
Thanks and Regards,
Deethya.

CLOSED

Rules-based GATP with sales BOM

Hi,
with reference to the following thread which asks the same question, but although in "answered" status, actually contains no answer to the final question...
GATP Question
We are investigating the possibility of using GATP with rules-based ATP to propose a sourcing plant. The result of this is of course a subitem in the sales order.
My question is, is there any restriction to using the sales BOM with rules-based ATP? We use the sales BOM currently to insert the packaging items into the sales order. From a previous project, I have in the back of my mind that there was a restriction in this respect, and that with the subitem from the GATP result, it was not possible to explode the sales BOM.
I cannot find what I recall to be the explicit SAP-help statement in this respect. Anybody with experience in this?
Regards,
Douglas

The current situation is as follows:
We have the saleable product A in plants X and Y, with a sales BOM in each of the plants, for the packaging items B and C. When product A is entered in the sales order in, say, plant X, the sales BOM is exploded and items B and C are inserted into the sales order. ATP is done in R/3, and if there is no availability in X, then the plant can be manually changed to Y, but each of the subitems from the sales BOM must also be manually changed to Y.
Desired to be situation:
We implement GATP, with a rule to subsitute plant X with plant Y in the event that plant X has no stock. So the desired system response is: enter item A in the sales order with plant X, GATP subsitutes plant X with plant Y and generates a subitem for product A in plant Y. Now the sales BOM is exploded for the new subitem, generating the further subitems for B and C, also in plant Y.
Is this possible?

Problem with sales order consumption

Hi
I hope someone can help? I have a problem with consumption of sales orders in APO. When a sales order comes across from R/3 it doesn't consume the forecast until a later sales order comes across, then the previous one consumes forecast. So all sales orders consume forecast apart from the latest one on each material.
Many thanks
Michael

Hi Please confirm the following are right in your strategy configuration in R/3:
Strategy:         40 Planning with final assembly
Reqmts type for indep.reqmts   VSF Planning with final assembly
Reqmts class: 101
Consumption: 1 Consume planning with assembly
Planning Ind.   1 Net requirements planning
Reqmt type of customer reqmt   KSV Sales order with consumption
Requirements class             050 Warehouse consumpt.
Allocation indicat.   1 Consume planning with assembly
No MRP                  Requirement planned

Transfer Posting problem with "sales order stock type" status

Hello, i have this problem, i spend 2 days looking in the forum, but
nothing, the question is:
The SD users sell an item, and the item get the status of "sales order
stock type" in the MMBE, but at the same time, the MM user made a
trasfer posting in two steps, he take out material with transaction
MIGO, mvt 351, to another plant, but the materail was already
compromised with SD; now he cant sell the items, because he dont
realize that the material was in sales order stock type, and he already
transfer it to another plant. how can i block this? if a material in
MMBE is with "sales order stock type" status, he CANT transfer it with
351 mvt type, what config i have to make? thanks a lot!!!!
now the quantity of the unrestict use
stock is lower than the sales order, we dont want to have this issue,
thanks again
Edited by: Alex Arti on Aug 6, 2008 7:14 PM
Edited by: Alex Arti on Aug 6, 2008 7:16 PM

Hi!
Have you recently upgraded to EHP4? In this case, please, check the note 1441195. This note should solve the issue that you are reporting.
I hope this helps,
Esther.

Delivery and Invoicing of items with Sales BoM

I have created a sales Bom and all the items are excisable. After creating delivery when i copy to Outgoing excise invoice, the system does not llow me to add and i get error "There are excisable items with non cenvatable tax code"
All the items created even the components are exciseable but it doesnt allow to copy the same tax code to the components and doesn't allow to mke OEI. How can i create invoices in such case? SAP 2007B, PL10
Thanks

Hi Agranshu........
Whichever tax you are taking into the transaction please check the Tax Category in Tax Type of BED, Cess and HSCess component. I guess that is under Non Cenvat.
This error generally comes when then Tax Types are not under cenvat tax codes and we try to add the transaction for excisable commodity.............
Regards,
Rahul

GATP with Sales BOM

Hi Gurus,
We have a requirement to check ATP (GATP) when Sales BOM (order BOM) is used. I am looking for some inputs on how to setup this scenario and how to explode Sales bom.o
Appreciate your inputs.
Thanks,
BKN

Hi,
I know sales bom creates sub items in sales order and R-ATP cannot be used for sub items. Is there a possibility not explode BOM until ATP is completed for header item?
Can you someone please reply to this. It is urgent issue..
Thanks,
Niranjan

Problem with Sales Set in ECC 6.0

Hai Guys,
I am having a problem on having a Sales Set. We have two company codes.
I am creating the sales set by the following steps.
1. Create an article, (type: Sales set instead of single article) and in the Basic Data, click the components button, in the subsequent screen entered the component articles and the qty.
2. After listing that Sales set article to the desired sites, I am creating the sales set article using the movement type 317 in tcode mb1b.
3. In my inventory, the component's stocks are reduced and the stock of the Sales set article is increased.
4. Once the Sales is made for the Sales set article, and PGI is done, the system reduces the stock of the Sales stock and no changes is made to the remaining component article stocks.
Here is where I encounter the issue.
In one of the company code, this is working fine.
But in the another company code's sites, when I do the PGI for Sales Set article, the stock of the Sales Set remains the same but the component articles' stocks are reducing.
I am startled to find the unusual behavior. Does it has anything to do with the site profile or any other MM customizations?
Had anybody come across this kind of issues previously? Can anybody help me in this aspect?
Regards,
Maheshwaran. I

no replies still.. so closing

Problem With Sales order

Hi Guys
we created a Salesorder with 10 items in which the material for last item of 118 qty was got abosolute before getting deliveres and a new item was created throught back order on the next day and allocated 1 qty from 118 qty
the remaining Items and one qty conformed was deliverd and got shipped.
here my problem is
the item which i talking got stucked at that level with out making availability check for the remaining 117 qty thought there is stock for that material
and also it is disabling the feilds in the VA02 Tcode to change the status .
the one qty conformed was deliverd and shipped to cust with the othere items
below are the two lines of item in my sales order
120 8201532 118 EA START-DEV ZOBS 0 D 10/17/2006 F002
130 8201786 118 EA START-DEV ZTAN 120 D 10/17/2006 F002
can any tell me please why and where this problem occured
Thanks & Regards
Babu

Hi,
Check up the material type of the Sales item and the availabillity checking group allocated in the material master.
Reward points if satisfied.
Thanks
Augustine Ponraj

Problem with sales order line items

hey All,
I wrote a simple test program this morning Using DI API that creates and updates orders, and I found some weird behaviour:
1. Once an order is created, if a line item is deleted off the order in B1 - the updates work fine.
2. If an item is added to the end of the order, the updates work fine.
3. If an item is added in the middle of the existing line items, the next update does weird things - it swaps prices and item keys and screws up the order total.
4. If an item code is changed to an existing item (such as changing the AddModel the actual item code), the update does weird thing, same as #3.
Has anyone experienced issues such as this? Or has anyone successfully completed an application like this that works properly?

Ok can anyone from SAP comment on this please? I have some more details if you want to duplicate this.
My simple program just creates a sales order from DI API. Then you complete step 2, 3, 4 as listed below using a Business One Client.
I then go back to my program and do some simple updates to the sales order through DI API using the SetCurrentLine method and looping over the Lines object count. Once I call the update method and go back into B1 to look at the order the DI API has updated the wrong items.
Anyone have any ideas or run into a similiar problem? We are desperate here for a fix.
Steps to duplicate
1. Create B1 sales order using DI API with 4 line items for example
2. In B1, delete a line item in the middle of the order
3. Change the first any item Code to a different item
4. Save the order in B1.
6. Run a sales order update from DI API.
7. Recall the order in B1 - the totals will be all jacked up and the prices will no longer match the items

Order creation with Sales BOM........

Hi there ,
If I maintain the MRP & work scheduling view in the material master & maintain <b>BOM with usage as <b>sales</b>.</b> Then can I create as process/production order of that material as there is no BOM with usage type production maintained in SAP........
Please enlighten me ........
Thanks
Kaushik

Kaushik,
A process/production order can be created without BOM also, so the answer is yes still you can create a production order.(You will get an additional status "NMAT" - No material).
If the usage is defined as Sales then that BOM will not get picked for Prodn/Proc order.
If the Item level details of the component is also defined "production relevant" with "Relavent to sales", then the BOM gets picked up. (This is defined in Status/Long txt tab page in component item level details).
Hope this helps...Reward your points if so,
Regards,
Prasobh

Problem regarding Sales BOM explosion in Delivery

Dear SD Gurus,
The problem is,
I've a BOM with Higher level item TAP.
when i do a partial delivery, only for the first time the BOM is getting exploded and later on whenever the user tries to create the delivery, only the header item in the BOM is displayed in the delivery. The user has to enter all the sub-items manually and also the quantity.
what must be the reason?
Please anyone try and throw some light. Its hard for the user to do so much data entry
Thanks & Regards

Hello Srikkanth,
Thanks again
but yes the check box for create delivery group is checked & also the structure group is A.
This is basically a quantity contract against which the user has cretad four release orders.
And for one order out of four user has created a partial delivery and invoice. Everything went fine until here.
Now when he wants to again create a delivery against the same order, only the header item for the BOM is displayed.
But the system is allowing to manually enter the sub-items and its quantity in the delivery and do the PGI and Invoice.
This is what i am not understanding,
and I hope you have understood the problem. Please ask me if any doubts.
Thanks

Problem with sales order stock.

Hi all,
I have stuck in one problem, please help.
We created one sales order A and after production stock is moved to that sales order.But then we created sales order B and moved stock of A to sales order B(By 413 E?). system created materail document for stock movement but stock was not transfered. we can see that stock is against sales order A only. But material document shows that stock is moved to B. then we deleted Sales order B.
Now the stck is against sales order A. when we try to do shipment systen gives error ' VALUATED STOCK BECOMES NEGATIVE.' Message No. M7 314. We have to.ship this material.
When I see the value of this stock it is showing zero.
Please advice what to do.
Thanks.
Edited by: s j on May 10, 2010 3:25 PM

Hi!
Have you recently upgraded to EHP4? In this case, please, check the note 1441195. This note should solve the issue that you are reporting.
I hope this helps,
Esther.

Problem with Sales order Credit Limit

Hi,
Ex: Customer - A
Credit Limit - 50000
While creating the sales order, if the customer exceeds the credit limit, Block the customer for creating the sales order.
How can i do this
Solution Pls
Rgds
sunfico

Hi,
Good morning and greetings,
You maintain the credit limits in FD32 and for establishing auto credit check functionalities use OVA8 and you can also specify leverage for +/- deviations...For releasing the blocked orders use VKM2.
Please reward points if found useful
Thanking you
With kindest regards
Ramesh Padmanabhan

Problem with Sales BOM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for