Problem with vat in invoice

Hi all
I have the following situation in one of my invoice
Payer: DOMESTIC
Bill to: DOMESTIC
Sold to: FOREIGN
In our company only domestic customer need to pay vat
When i produce the invoice it came out with VAT ; 0.00
As I know what determine the content of the invoice came from the bill to.
despite this I get invoice with vat 0
Please your help
Thanks
Eyal

Hi Eyal,
There are some settings you should control in order for us to give you a precise answer.
During sales order processing, the system copies the tax classification from the tax information stored in the :
          - customer master record of the payer, if the payer is different from the sold-to party and the sales tax identification number is maintained for the payer.
          - ship to party, if the sales tax identification number of the ship-to party is maintained.
          - sold-to party, if none of the criteria for the payer or the ship-to party are met.
During pricing, the system calculates any relevant taxes by      taking the following factors into account:
          - The tax classification of the customer (KNVI-TAXKD) and the material
          - The country keys of the customer and the delivering plant (basically the 2 digits for the country of the plant and the payer)
After this you should control their combination (material master + customer master) in VK12 for condition type MWST - select the access sequence you're using and check the values of the condition type + validity periods.
If everything looks ok, you should check in the sales order /billing pricing determination analysis (go to the pricing tab and bellow click in the button pricing analysis and check which access sequence did the system determined for the condition type MWST.
Hope this helped....let me know.
Best regards,
Alcides Fialho

Similar Messages

Problem with VAT

Dear All,
I have to show both Sales Price and VAT in same ALV grid, i, e using tcode VK13, I have to show this. Users use VK13
condition type(KSCHL)- VKP0 to see the sales price(KBETR) values and
 ZVT1 to see VAT(KBETR) values.
But they dont want to use radio buttons now, they need to see both the Sales Price and VAT in same grid. I tried several ways. But the problem here i found is Sales Price uses table A073 for getting Condition record no(KNUMH), where VAT uses table A004 for getting Condition record no(KNUMH). But the table KONP holds both Sales Price and VAT in KBETR,based on KNUMH. I am unable to marge this two tables. The selection parameters will be - Sales Org(VKORG), Distribution Channel(VTWEG), Material no(MATNR), Valid on(DATAM). Plz give me some idea.
With regards,
Roslaine.

Hi Rosaline,
I copy a coding to get the data of percentage of VAT (in my case for Spain, check in tcode FTXP the parameters for your country) as a sample for your coding.
data: clasif_mt like mlan-taxm1,
 clasif_cl like knvi-taxkd,
 percentage like konp-kbetr.
select single taxm1 into clasif_mt from mlan
 where matnr = p_matnr
 and aland = 'ES'.
select single taxkd into clasif_cl from knvi
 where kunnr = p_kunnr
 and aland = 'ES'
 and tatyp = 'MWST'. "your SD condition (VK13)
select * from a002
 into table i_a002
 where kappl = 'V'
 and kschl = 'MWST'
 and aland = 'ES'
 and taxk1 = clasif_cl
 and taxm1 = clasif_mt.
delete i_a002 where datbi < pp_fecha.
read table i_a002 index 1. "??? debug it and see the data
select single * from konp
 where knumh = i_a002-knumh.
percentage = konp-kbetr / 10.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

Problem with posting vendor invoice (MRHR) due to posting period

Hello,
Good day.
Recently, due to the closing of posting period 12 2006, a new posting period was created for 2006 to reconcile some unproccessed posting for that year. This posting period 13 2006 was created in FI (OB52).
Unfortunatley, even though posting period 13 2006 is available. When creating a vendor invoice (MRHR) with reference to PO, specifying the posting perio 13 2006 would create an error message
"Allowed posting periods: 01 2007 / 12 2006 / 12 2006"
I debuged the program and tracked down the source in the table MARV, which seesm to be maintained in the transaction code OMSY.
However, when I tried to change the data for the company code a message would apperar
"The company code <ccode> can no longer be initialized"
I also tried tcode MMRV and allowed posting to previous period, but that didnt work.
What actions do you guys suggest so that the Vendor Invoice/Invoice Verification can be posted in period 13? Thanks and good day.

Thanks very much, i'll check it when my internet is stable. Unfortunatley the earthquake in Taiwan messed up our internet
Award points once I see it!
If there are any other tips that may prove useful please feel free to post them.

Problem with posting parked invoices

We created a few vendor invoices through MIRO and parked them. When we tried to post these invoices using FBV0, the system gives us an error message saying the Document does not net to zero. All the invoices have the same error message. We checked the documents and they all balance to zero. Has anybody encountered the same issue? Thank you.

Hello,
Please refer SAP
Note 896610 - FBV0: Posting not possible due to minor difference
Note 561559 - FBV0: Subsequent note to note 510026 (II)
Regards,
Ravi

Problem with output in Invoice

Hi,
I have an output ZXXX which should come when invoice is created using VF04 tcode.It is coming for some invoices properly but for some other invoices it is not coming but when i open that invoice in change mode(VF02) and press the save button then output is coming.
Please let e know the reason or solution for this.
Thanks
Regards
Shoban

Hi,
You need to check you output determination configuration in SPRO.
Sales & Distribution -> Basic Functions -> Output Control -> Output Determination
You need to know how is determined your ZXXX output. Then you need to investigate why some invoices do not get this output. It is well documented so just read SAP documentation.
Cheers

Strange Problem with Forms (Smart Forms)

I have lately been experiencing a strange problem with standard forms in the system. We have WebAS640 / ECC5.0 System. Soon after the initial run of patches, most forms in the system are showing the character '#' in place of formatted texts.
I have searched the internet and most forums, but have not found a solution. Since this is the standard forms that i am talking about (unmodified and untouched) so i assumed this had something to do with our patch levels. However that is only an assumption.
In particular i am having problem with the billing invoice type RD00, form name: LB_BIL_INVOICE. I have traced the problem to this much. The form shows the expected text, where no character format is applied to it. And where ever there is some character format, it just shows a string of hashes ('#'). The style being used by this form is LO_STYLE.
I am also listing my patch levels in case that helps.
SAP_BASIS     640             0014
SAP_ABA             640             0014
ST-PI             003C_640     0001
PI_BASIS     2004_1_640     0006
SAP_BW             350             0012
SAP_HR             500             0005
SAP_APPL     500             0006
PI             2004_1_500     0004
EA-IPPE             300             0004
EA-RETAIL     500             0005
EA-PS             500          0005
EA-HR             500          0005
EA-GLTRADE     500          0005
EA-FINSERV     500          0005
EA-DFPS      500          0005
EA-APPL      500           0005
Hope somebody can help in regard

Hi Ashan!
Interesting problem. You are seeing replacement characters, because assigned font(size) is not installed (somewhere, SAP or printer).
But since this is completely standard, open an OSS-request - maybe it's not as fast as SDN, but I'm sure you will get a qualified answer (and solution).
Regards,
Christian

Problem with MM invoice

I found a problem in the amount of a MM invoice Item.
Two similar items have different amounts in Purchase order history and I am trying to understand why does this happen, considering that the referred items have the same material number, price, quantity.
When creating the invoice document, the VAT Code is calculated to each item. The VAT values are rounded and inflicted in the last item of the purchase document.
EXAMPLE : Item n-3: PO net price x (1 + VAT code) = 149,94 x 1,23 = 184,4262 u2248 184,43
 Rouding = 184,43 - 184,4262 = 0,0038
 Item n-2: PO net price x (1 + VAT code) = 149,94 x 1,23 = 184,4262 u2248 184,43
 Rouding = 184,43 - 184,4262 = 0,0038
 Item n-1: PO net price x (1 + VAT code) = 149,94 x 1,23 = 184,4262 u2248 184,43
 Rouding = 184,43 - 184,4262 = 0,0038
 Item n: PO net price x (1 + VAT code) = 149,94 x 1,23 = 184,4262 + (0,0038 *3) = 184,44
Is there any way to control this situation?
thank you!!
Best regards,
André

Hi
Please go through the following SAP OSS Notes ->
Note 1052883 Performance problems in the SUS invoice
1049853 SUS invoice: Missing tax check
1013293 Too many tax codes in the SUS invoice
1004936 No control data when printing SUS invoice
995167 Tax display in SUS credit memo is incorrect
988883 Error BBP_TAX 005 in SUS invoice
984332 Misleading message for count status in an SUS invoice
983259 SUS credit memo with error in meta BAPI call
980413 Payment status tray not visible for credit memos
982151 Error in payment status in a SUS invoice
Note 946275 SRM-SUS: Invoice for blanket purchase order not possible
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Document splitting: vendor invoice with VAT cannot be posted because of tax

Hello
I try to post a vendor invoice with document splitting active. I can post a document without VAT but with VAT (input tax 21%) I get the message "Posting possible only with zero balance" balance; balance on other line items is 210 EUR.
001 31       0000105675 Vendo                      1.000,00-                V4
002 40       0000601000 Purchase of consuma           500,00                 V4
003 40       0000601000 Purchase of consuma           500,00                 V4
In customizing for document splliting I have following categories assigned to the GL accounts:
100     399999     01000     Balance Sheet Account
411000     411000     05100     Taxes on Sales/Purchases
440000     441000     03000     Vendor
451000     451000     05100     Taxes on Sales/Purchases
500000     580000     01000     Balance Sheet Account
600000     699999     20000     Expense
700000     759010     30000     Revenue
The field status group of the tax gl account has following field optional: cost center, profit center, segment (on which document splitting is require)
What should I do so that the document splitting works also for the tax accounts so that they appear in the gl document?
kr
Arjan

Hi,
This problem does not seem to be of Document Splitting. When you post the document, balance of the document does not come to zero. This problem somewhat relates to Parrelel currency configured.
Please depict entire scenario. Let me know in which currency you are posting document and which transaction and what message system is shooting.
Straight solution can be you manually change the 210 EUR balance into document by clicking on more data.
Regards,
Chitnan Joshi.

VAT declaration in XML - Problem with report RFASLDPC

Hello all,
I have a problem with the report RFASLDPC. We use it to download an XML file that we generated which contains the VAT declaration.
In the report RFASDLPC, there is a FORM named QUELLFILE_PRUEFEN which stop the report and display a message : "Data file FILE_NAME is not correct".
The reason is that QUELLFILE_PRUEFEN checks (for Belgium) that the beginning of my document starts with '000000' (six times zero). But this is impossible for an XML file to begin with '000000'. An XML file must begin with "<?xml version="1.0" ?>" or a least "<".
Here is the code :
FORM QUELLFILE_PRUEFEN.
OPEN DATASET PAR_PATH FOR INPUT IN BINARY MODE.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
 MESSAGE E306 WITH PAR_PATH. ''Quellfile nicht vorhanden
ENDIF.
READ DATASET PAR_PATH INTO HLP_RECORD.
CASE PAR_FTYP.
 WHEN 'AT'. ''ASL Österreich
 IF HLP_RECORD(1) NE 'I' OR HLP_RECORD+46(2) NE 'ZM'.
 MESSAGE A185(FR) WITH PAR_PATH.
 ENDIF.
 WHEN 'BE'. ''ASL Belgien
 IF HLP_RECORD(6) NE '000000'.
 MESSAGE A185(FR) WITH PAR_PATH.
 ENDIF.
 WHEN 'ES'. ''ASL Spanien
* IF HLP_RECORD(1) NE '1' OR HLP_RECORD+104(3) NE '349'.
 IF HLP_RECORD(1) NE '1' OR HLP_RECORD+1(3) NE '349'.
 MESSAGE A185(FR) WITH PAR_PATH.
 ENDIF.
 when 'FI'.
 if hlp_record(3) ne '000'.
 MESSAGE A185(FR) WITH PAR_PATH.
 ENDIF.
ENDCASE.
CLOSE DATASET PAR_PATH.
The line :
READ DATASET PAR_PATH INTO HLP_RECORD.
Put the 128 first character of the XML file in HLP_RECORD because HLP_RECORD is defined as :
HLP_RECORD(128) TYPE C
So as I work in Belgium, it is the condition :
WHEN 'BE'. ''ASL Belgien
 IF HLP_RECORD(6) NE '000000'.
 MESSAGE A185(FR) WITH PAR_PATH.
 ENDIF.
which is checked. But this condition cleary check if the beginning of the XML is '000000' and if it is not, it stop the program.
I searched for all the SAP notes about RFASLDPC but I found none about this problem.
Did someone else have also this problem ? Did you find a way to solve this ?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Best Regards.
Gregory Pierre.

anyone has an idea ? ...

Problem with Invoice

Hi Experts,
Iam facing a problem with invoice document with batch wise . If I enter one batch it taking 2 mins to add the the invoice document.i have removed Sp transaction notification and format searches even then it is taking 2 mins. So kindly give me solution how to solve this issue.
client system Os Windows 7
Ram 4 GB
No addons connected and Lan was working without any abrupts.
Regards
Jenny

Hi Jenny,
Is this issue happen all the machines or it happens only at one specific machine?
If it is happens on a specific machine, try to reconfigure the lan settings of the machine or reinstall the B1 client.
You can check the sbo-common sevt table. this always triggered in some versions. this can cause performance issues.
I hope it helps,
János

Problem with Bulk printing of invoices using VF31.

Hi,
I tried to give bulk print of invoices using VF31, for around 200+ copies. Printing was going on but suddenly stopped after 50 copies get printed.
Situation is the same even after i retry it.
Can someone advice on the reason please.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Srikrishhna13

Issue identified and there was a problem with Network.

INVOIC IDOC - E1EDK28 Problem with selection of multiple bank accounts

Hi SAP-Experts!
I have a problem with house banks in outgoing invoice IDOC INVOIC.
We have maintained several house banks in one company code with up to 3 different account ID's.
I was wondering why there is (in my point of view) the wrong bank account populated in one ot the IDOC segments E1EDK28.
What I found out while debugging the code which fills the internal table it012k is, that he selects only the first row from table t012k
(select * from t012k up to 1 rows).
We have already implemented the OSS notes concerning currency dependency and SEPA.
By switching the account ID sequence in sandbox system, e.g. from EUR to SEK, the program picks now the "correct" bank details.
From my Point of view this cannot be a porper logic always to pick the first entry.
Has anyone experienced that issue, too? Is there any solution for this problem (in standard).
If not, I will raise an OSS call at SAP for this.
Thanks for any thoughts!
Stefan

When you enter bank details in master, update field "Partner bank type" LFBK-BVTYP with free form value, may be currency is good choice.
During invoice entry, this field is available for update, update which bank to be used for payment of this invoice. You may build logic to populate this field, like substitution to populate currency in this field during invoice posting.
During payment, system checks value in field Partner bank type in invoice and selects corresponding bank.
Hope this helps.

MIR7...a problem with an invoice..PLEASE HELP!!!

Hi all,
i just want to create a preliminary invoice in the Tx. MIR7, but something happen with the item i want to add to the invoice and, doesnt let me create the preliminary invoice a throw the follow "error": Error in routing MRM_DRSEG_FILL(SAPLMRMH). Why the Tx. shows me that "error"?. Please help, i'm debugging the standard and i cant figure out what is the problem with the item.
Thanx in advance

Hi Mariana ,
I am facing exactly the same error.
Can you please guide as to how you solved the problem.
Regards
Suman Chakraborty

Problems with Adobe account and Adobe support!

We bought in December 2012 "Creative Cloud for teams" (10 licenses).
I have since started our problems with support Adobe that continue today: (
1. We do not receive invoices by e-mail - every month we have to ask several times adobe support on the current invoice and then wait for it a few weeks!
2. We receive e-mail confirmation with errors - confirmation of transactions on a credit card that we receive by e-mail are wrong - no part of the information.
3. No confirmation on Adobe account - on account do not have Adobe confirmation of financial operations for the month.
4. No information about the subscription on Adobe account - There is no information about subscriptions purchased
We contact every few days with Adobe and get the standard answer "please wait 2-3 business days..." ..... and nothing.
Adobe... why you're doing jokes about the business customer?

Ehhh...
Every company in Poland who buys a service or product Adobe need VAT invoice (
required document).
I have in my Adobe account information only payments for the month of December.
For this month I print the invoice (screenshot below).
But unfortunately there is no information on payments for the next month - a technical error Adobe account!
My friend also has a company and subscription and have all the information in Adobe account (screenshot below).

Problem with Intrastat handling (MEIS)

Dear SCN Members,
we have a problem with Intrastat handling:
Our company is in Great Britain (example VAT-No. GB123456789)
We have a vendor in Switzerland (no EU VAT-No.), who has a fiscal representative in Belgium (example VAT-No. BE1234567890).
Both have a separate vendor number (swiss vendor: 23176, belgian vendor: 33179).
We created a partner "WL" (Goods Supplier) in the vendor master data of the swiss vendor and assigend the belgian vendor number. The swiss vendor master data has nothing filled in the "VAT Reg. No." field (LFA1-STCEG) of the vendor master data. The belgian vendor number has the belgian VAT-No. filled in the "VAT Reg. No." field (LFA1-STCEG) of the vendor master data.
The partner "WL" is automatically taken into the purchase order header partners and is also taken into account for the goods receipt posting.
After I have posted the vendor invoice, the line is shown in transaction MEIS, but the incompletion log is always showing message no. EIP029:
The system did not find the VAT registration number of vendor 23176.
In my opinion, the VAT no. of the fiscal representative (BE1234567890) should be taken into account for the Intrastat reporting, as the swiss vendor has no VAT number. We have not yet managed to get the belgian VAT into the Intrastat report.
Could you please clarify. Thanks in advance for your help!

Hi,
Please refer the KBA: 1988909 - MEIS: Error EIP 029 "The system did not find the VAT registration number of vendor The reason and the solution is well explained in the KBA. You may change the configuration as explained in the KBA and test again.
Regards,
AKPT

Problem with vat in invoice

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for