Problems with webmail on godaddy?

I just bought a MacMini in March and have been using godaddy.com webmail because I have a business web site there. I could not get to my email on-line kept telling me the server was not found. So, I called Godaddy, not problem with servers. Then called comcast and reset all of my Safari which is up to date. I had just recently repaired permissions. Still hangs the web mail but then it opens up, then it does not work. All other sites I go to work! Then, I just went back to permissions. Verified and saw I needed to repair a bunch of permissions! What is that all about?? Not sure why my webmail is not responding very quickly. I think it might have something to do with permissions when I did that recently?

From the Safari menu bar, select
Safari ▹ Preferences ▹ Extensions
Turn all extensions OFF and test. If the problem is resolved, turn extensions back ON and then disable them one or a few at a time until you find the culprit.
If you wish, you may be able to salvage the malfunctioning extension by uninstalling and reinstalling it. That will revert its settings to the defaults.

Similar Messages

Problems with webmail

Hello,
Since ( i think ) the last update 10.5.5 my girlfriend cannot send mails with her Webmail. it doesn't matter i've she is using Safari, Firefox or Opera. Recieving mails is no problem. Everything works fine exept sending a mail. It looks normal if she is sending one but nobody recievs her mail anymore. If she's logs in from an other computer ( Mac or Windows ) everthing is working perfect.
Is there some one having an solution? Thanks.

Try having her empty the Safari cache. Although you said it didn't work on another browser either, this seems odd.
However, I just had a problem with a web app that I had never logged into before, and it didn't work on either Firefox or Safari. They suggested I empty the cache (actually, they told me to clear the cache in Internet Explorer), and I scoffed. But, after emptying the Safari Cache, it worked. I still think it was a coincidence, and something on their end was reset.

CE 565 - Problem with webmail

Has anyone had a problem getting their content engine to cache Yahoo mail, Hotmail, etc.. My CE is fully caching everything, but after authenticating to these webmail sites, clicking on the inbox link results in a blank page. Any ideas anyone? Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Hi,
following are my answers to your questions.
1) yes if there is HTTPS you have to enable it.
2) okay
3) hmm is there realy nothing mentioned? because there needs to be a HTTP connect because other wise an error-message would be displayed
4) Could you upload the sniffer trace taken infront and behind the CE so that we can have a look at it?
In terms of your last question I think more or less every webmailer is using more or less the same technique. HTTP or https for send data to the customer. May be there are slight difference in terms of cookies, java, jsp, php, asp but that shouldn't be a problem.
Btw does the webmail page work with your testPC if you access it directly without having the CE in the game?
Kind Regards,
Joerg

Problem with webmail

Hi All,
I have just installed filemaker server on a mail server. now when a user logs into webmail they get this on the login page, then will not display any mail once signed in
Notice: Use of undefined constant SERVER_NAME - assumed 'SERVER_NAME' in /private/etc/squirrelmail/config/config.php on line 118
Notice: Use of undefined constant SquirrelMail - assumed 'SquirrelMail' in /private/etc/squirrelmail/config/config.php on line 1049
Notice: Use of undefined constant user - assumed 'user' in /private/etc/squirrelmail/config/config.php on line 1050
Notice: Use of undefined constant prefkey - assumed 'prefkey' in /private/etc/squirrelmail/config/config.php on line 1051
Notice: Use of undefined constant prefval - assumed 'prefval' in /private/etc/squirrelmail/config/config.php on line 1052
Notice: Use of undefined constant detect - assumed 'detect' in /private/etc/squirrelmail/config/config.php on line 1057

Check /etc/apache2/httpd.conf (or /etc/httpd/httpd.conf if you use apache 1.3) and disable (comment out) the PHP module installed by Filemaker and re-enable the original one). This is assuming Filemaker does not overwrite the original PHP version.
Should the original have been overwritten, try and install the latest combo updater followed by security updates. I believe it contained a PHP update. This should bring you back to where you were. You may still need to edit httpd.conf.
If later you re-install Filemaker Server, make sure you do not let it install it's own version of PHP and install only its API instead.

Problem with opening of PDF in my webmail application

I have a problem with opening a pdf file in my webmail application of my internet provider in apple safari since yesterday. When I wanted to open up a pdf file I got a pop up message to allow a connection between adobe and the webmail application which I did. Since then I can not open up a pdf file. If I go to another browser or if I use email from another internet provider I use too it works and I can open up. It seems to be a blockage of the specific combination of this webmail application and safari.
What can I do ?

Hi,
I have same requirement.
I need to cnvert smartform->pdf->send mail.
The mail is send but the attachment is corrupted.
Can you tell me what code you have written so its working in developement?

I have a problem with my Webmail, and Blackberry Tour

The Situation I have with my blackberry Tour and my Webmail is that whenever my ATT Yahoo Webmail receives emails, it displays it as opened automatically. I turned off the Email Reconcilication for the Wireless Reconcile, and thought that would solve the problem but it still would display as opened on the ATT Yahoo Webmail. But when I changed the password on the Webmail, it no longered displayed it as opened when it is received until I re-fixed the connection with my Blackberry Tour by changing it to the modified password. Also this problem did not come up when I was using Yahoo Webmail but only when I moved from Yahoo Webmail to ATT Yahoo Webmail only. I have posted the problem to ATT Yahoo Webmail already but I am posting one here, just in case if it is a problem with blackberry Tour.
Thank You

Why can't emails be sent? Is there an error?
Might also have better luck, if you truly believe the "server" needs to be changed, asking AOL what it should be set to.

Mail problems with Panther

I'm having difficulties downloading email into my client mail on my IMac. (I use Macmail, through BTinternet, an outside ISP. (Not Mac) The problem arose when I recently sent out a round robin email to a large number of hotels in Italy enquiring about accommodation - it's clear from my webmail account that dozens of them replied with quite large emails, brochuires etc etc etc. When I try to download these into my inbox, the spinning icon continues to spin round before telling me that Port 110 or something cannot accept or send emails or that my mail account has timed out. Any thoughts would be much appreciated. There is no problem with the interent connection, only mail

I just read what you wrote. So you are talking about Mail. All right. Can you see how big the inbox is in Mail - that is reported at the top of its window. I am asking this to see if you have an overfull inbox, which can cause problems.

There is a problem with the security certificate of the proxy server. Error code 18 and 38.

Hi All,
After several hours and a short night of sleep I'm out of ideas and hopefully someone here can help me trying to solve this one. First of all the situation:
Exchange 2013 on a remote location with a CA-certificate.
Outlook 2010 and 2013 on different locations, locally installed and on RDS.
When I open Outlook on my laptop all is fine, no errors, good sync, no problem. But when I open Outlook on our Remote Desktop Servers with Outlook 2013 I'm getting errors like "There is a problem with the security certificate of the proxy server. The
name on the security certificate is invalid or does not match the name of the site. Outlook is unable to connect to this server. (Error code 18)". Opening Outlook 2010 the message is the same, but the error code now is 38.
After this Outlook opens and is working, there's one more error though. After a while an security warning pops up with the message: "Information you exchange with this site cannot be viewed or changed by others. However, there is a problem with the
site's security certificate. * The security certificate was issued by a company you have not chosen to trust. View the certificate to determine whether you want to trust the certifying authority. * The security certificate is valid. * The name on the security
certificate is invalid or does not match the name of the site."
Strangest thing is, it is the certificate of my RDS! It isn't my valid en officially bought certificate from my mailserver. What's going on? I'm out of options, what I've tried so far (in random order):
- restarting mailserver and AD;
- restarting switches;
- restarting routers;
- restarting RDS, AD and all other servers;
- bypassed proxyserver for RDS;
- created a new profile;
- checked recently installed updates;
- checked certificate on mailserver;
- checked RDS on a different location, working fine.
Nothing helped, what can I do next? Please advice.
Regards.

Found a thread that solves half my problem (https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/70d18244-889a-4d95-ac3f-e234672a82b2/there-is-a-problem-with-the-proxy-servers-security-certificate-error-when-starting-outlook?forum=exchangesvrclients).
The first message can be suppressed by adding this to the Exchange config:
set-outlookprovider -Identity EXCH -CertprincipalName msstd:webmail.domain.tld
set-outlookprovider -Identity EXPR -CertprincipalName msstd:webmail.domain.tld
Giving the command get-outlookprovider, gives me empty information regarding the certprinipalname. Filled
this and after recreating the profile or deleting the ost-file I still have the second alert with the local certificate of my RDS.
Not completely where I want to be, any help regarding the second alert is greatly appreciated!

Can't get into talk talk email account in Mozilla, you have undefined new mails in your inbox message. No problem with Internet Explorer though

I've been using the Firefox browser for nearly a year now but for the past three days I can't open my tiscali email account via Firefox. The message "you have undefined new mails in your inbox" comes up. Talk Talk technical help says there is a problem with Firefox and advised me to use Internet Explorer. I can get into my account through Explorer but would much prefer to use Firefox so please help me out.

Apparently TalkTalk mail will work with Firefox 4 and Firefox 5 ''if'' you set the browser to ''lie'' to TalkTalk mail by saying that you are still using version 3.6.
You can find the instructions for that in a post on the TalkTalk forums: [http://www.talktalk.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=185113#post2452787 Firefox 4 & TalkTalk webmail - Forums].
Note: when you open about:config the first time, it will display a warning message that you should be careful with the changes you make. That's definitely good to bear in mind.
Does it work?

Is Apple doing anything to fix the problem with displaylink in Mavericks?

I have been doing the Beta track for several years. Apple has been fairly good about ironing out the bugs before a release (as compared to Microsuck and other OS alternatives). But this problem with DisplayLink and Mavericks is about to kill me. I've been running multiple displays for several years and never had problems with prior OSX versions. My work computer (Macbook Pro) is still running Lion and works perfectly with DisplayLink and two 27" Samsung HD monitors. I would really love to get back to using the monitor setup with my Dev environment, however I can't even get a 2013 model Mavericks Macbook Pro to recognize that the DisplayLink device (IBM USB3.0 dock) is connected.
Once or twice I've gotten one monitor to show up after using the computer for a random amount of time. On that occasion, suddenly the main screen blinked and the second monitor came to life. I was reading webmail with Safari at the time and no other apps were running or had been started when it happened. This sort of thing isn't what I would classify as release-ready.
Every seed announcement I keep hoping for a fix, but after 3 since the Mav release, I'm beginning to lose hope. Anyone have info on how this might be made to work?
Thanks
David

DisplayLink also points fingers at Apple, which may be completely valid, but expecting Apple to put much effort into problems that only affect third-party hardware using an unsupported interface seems a bit of wishful thinking.
However, rumor sites indicate a focus on graphics in the next update : http://www.macrumors.com/2014/03/06/apple-seeds-first-os-x-10-9-3-build-to-devel opers/

List of Problems with new Web Mail

List of Problems with NEW Web Mail :
- At first doesn't open full page message list or retain full page as default setting, have to drag down bar
- Only shows 20 message lines after “pulling down” the divider, screen partially empty until I scroll down. It should show at least 26, preferably all available
- After moving bar, bar moves back up after going back to inbox (not delete message) after reading a message, have to move it down again, and again...
- Doesn't go to next message when delete message on screen is selected, no setting option for default to do this.
- There is a drop down to select which folder to move a selected email to. The initial display shows 7 usable choices, with the usual slider and arrow to show more choices. The space on the slider clearly shows more choices are present (actually about 20 or so are there), but any attempt to use the slider or arrow to see more choices causes the drop-down to instantly disappear. I can't move the selected field with arrow keys either. I can select any of the visible 7 choices, and move an email to only one of the 7. NOTE: This one works in both IE and Firefox, but if Verizon Webmail was fully web standard (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_standards) compliant it would also work in my preferred browser, Mozilla Seamonkey, the direct descendant of the original Mozilla browser. Webmail should be FULLY web standard.
- Occasionally a message will move from inbox to trash, without NO indication or command to move them.
- Emails occasionally flash an error message and simply disappear - not to trash or other findable place, just disappear. No time to read the error message either.
- No way to set a whitelist for supposed spam emails, unless the whitelist for “Blocking” is the same. Very unclear.
- How can I switch my service back to the original, basic, email which works ok? I know it’s still there, since some of my other accounts still access it!!!
This seems my only way of getting this info direclty to the programming staff. If it doesn't actually do this, will SOMEONE PLEASE FORWARD THIS MESSAGE TO THEM !?!
Thanks!

vz_ric wrote:
The majority of websites are set up the same way for all browsers. It's the software manufacturers responsibility to make their software compatible with websites, not the other way around. Otherwise everyone who has a website will have to make 10 different sites to work multiple browsers.
Contrarily, it is Verizon's, as well as other companies like Verizon whose customer base uses a wide variety of web browsers, web page designers' responsibility to use only standard W3C-recognized code and not to use non-standard non-W3C-recognized code, e.g., Microsoft's Internet Explorer specific code, when designing their web pages. In my opinion based on my observations, Verizon's web page designers are too often guilty of using IE-specific code.

Is Verizon unwilling or unable to fix problem with Account Owner(s)

A forum or Google search reveals several customers unhappy with how Verizon treats the account owners... count me as one. I'm sure there are many more customers who were equally unhappy but just accept Verizon's incompetence and complete the unnecessary gymnastics of un-registering accounts and then re-registering with a new username.
PROBLEM:
There are numerous scenarios that can cause a My Verizon account to have the Account Owner be listed with an incorrect telephone number. In my case, I had an account with AT&T and 3 additional numbers associated. As each account expired, I transferred the numbers to Verizon. The first account transferred was my 14yr old son. I registered a My Verizon account for management (my name & my userid) and eventually added the additional numbers, however, the Account Owner's phone number is listed as my son's cell.
Over the past 2 years (since I migrated to Verizon), I've had small problems with account notifications and other information being text to my son's cell. I've called numerous times and customer service says it's corrected, but eventually the problems return. Recently, I upgraded my phone and started using some new services like Backup Assistant and the fact that the Account Owner is associated with an incorrect number has caused even more trouble.
I simply want to keep my existing username for My Verizon and correct the cell phone number associated as the Account Owner. This should be extremely simple.
VERIZON'S SOLUTION:
"We can't do it". "Our systems don't allow us to make this change".
The Customer Service Department (or Lack of Customer Service Department) tells me that since they can't or are unwilling to do the necessary changes, their only solution is to force their customer to do their work. They will un-register the account and I can register again. There is no concern for the preferences of an existing customer (almost 3 years); there is no concern for the inconvenience caused to an existing customer who spends hundreds of dollars each month and thousands of dollars each year (I currently have 2 separate accounts with Verizon, 4 phones on my problem account and 4 phones on another for a total of 8 phones with data plans... do the math); there is no concern that I will now have to use a completely different username one that is no longer uniform with my other accounts; there is no concern that I will have to change any and all services that reference My Verizon. Quite simply... Verizon Wireless shows their Account Owners that they have no concern for us.
PROPER SOLUTION:
I have almost 25 years of Information Technology experience and over 3 years working with Call Centers (similar to Verizon's Customer Service), which explains in part why I find this so frustrating... the fix for this is SIMPLE!!! The real problem is that Verizon simply doesn't care enough to fix it because we are existing customers and not new customers.
Without going into specifics (nor could I since I don't have access to their systems), data for the My Verizon portal is contained within modifiable databases. These relational databases will be tied to other systems and other databases, but a modification of this type would just require that the portal be allowed to make the update to the appropriate field(s) within the appropriate database(s). If direct access is not attainable because of their design, it is still not too difficult to write an additional process to accommodate this change. These types of things are done everyday.
More importantly, even if Verizon was unable or unwilling to make these programming changes... I have no doubt that if Customer Service has an escalation process to their I.T. Department that a programmer with access to the application(s) and/or database(s) could easily make the change directly and almost immediately.
CONCLUSION:
Until now, my experience with Verizon has been mostly positive even to the point of recommending the carrier to friends and family. I've found their coverage area to meet my needs and the data speeds to be more than satisfactory. However, Verizon needs to remember that cellular service has essentially become a commodity and that customer retention is often based on other things than simply providing dial tone. With a monthly cell phone expense that rivals a car payment, I would think that Verizon would be more than willing to accommodate such a simple request to maintain a satisfied customer.
If you too are one of the many customers having issue with modifying the Account Owner, just resolve yourself that it appears Verizon is unwilling to make the simple correction to the My Verizon portal to satisfy our request.

I'm not 100% sure that I follow your reasoning, so please correct me if I misstate your opinions. I've numbered them so it will be easier to identify any mistakes I make.
1. Not allowing a user, customer service representative, or any Verizon representative to change the cell phone number associated with the Account Owner to another cell phone number on the same account is a security risk.
I'm not suggesting that I be allowed to change the name, social security number, or any other pertinent details related to establishing the original account. All the information pertaining to who is responsible for the bill remains the same with the single exception that the current associated cell phone number be changed to another number already listed on the account. In what possible manner is this a security risk? Frankly if the ability was enabled and someone either by mistake or incompetence made such a change the impact would simply be what I'm currently experiencing (inconvenience). Since in this hypothetical situation the ability to change this value is enabled, the "inconvenience" would easily be re-mediated by returning the value to its original state.
Furthermore, if there is some "security risk" that I'm over looking then an organization that is concerned about providing quality customer service would create procedures to accommodate customer requests and meet security requirements. Let's use a bank (with an obvious security vulnerability) and debit cards as an example. If I lose my debit card, I cannot go to my computer and print out a temporary debit card (very user friendly, but not secure). Some banks will allow you to go online and cancel the lost debit card while requesting a new one to be mailed to the address you have on file (user friendly and mostly secure). To solve this same problem at other banks might require you to go into the office and sign a form cancelling the lost debit card and confirming the address to mail you a new one (less user friendly, but highly secure). The Verizon equivalent, is me requesting that I add an existing bank account to my online banking and being told "We can't do it". However, because the bank cares so much about keeping me as a customer... they will delete my account, allow me to create another, possibly losing my historical data, have me change my username that I've been using for years, spend time adding all my online bill payments... all for the pleasure of staying their customer and getting to use their services as they should have been designed.
2. Making a software change that would allow users or CSR's to associate a different cell phone number on the account to the current Account Owner would be difficult and require downtime.
You give some time expounding this thought and I'm unaware of your web, application, and/or database experience... but I will try to address your concerns later. However, let's assume that you are correct and these changes will be difficult ("taking weeks to months"). The purpose of my post was whether Verizon was unwilling or unable to accommodate this customer request. You seem to be agreeing that Verizon is unwilling to make these changes, or at the very least, feel that Verizon has decided that the time and expense involved is of more importance than correcting an issue impacting their customers. I personally find the later equally disheartening as this has been an issue for many customers (you yourself mention experiencing the problem) and has been well documented through previous forum and Internet posts. Even by your estimations, if they had taken previous customer complaints seriously... this would have been fixed by now. Once again it seems the obvious answer is that Verizon may not consider customer service as an important factor as I do.
As far as your technology issues, I agree that more than a web page change would be required. I do take issue with comparing the change of a distributed application (operating system) that must be designed to support enumerable hardware components to the work required to makes changes to a web portal with a back-end in-house database. You could write an entire book detailing the differences between these two scenarios as they have very little in common, but I'll try to keep it focused to your points.
Coding
Coding an Operating System that must run on literally a multitude of hardware configurations and support an unending diversity of applications is an incredible endeavor and really never a finished product. Changes to an OS are constantly being made and the developers must consider hardware and software that they are not intimately familiar and occasionally even deal with 3rd parties to facilitate changes.
The change I'm advocating has a web component which would be replicated throughout their web server topology, however, these are items that Verizon's developers deal with routinely (if not daily). There are a very limited number of 3rd party concerns (a few different browsers, IE, Chrome, Mozilla & a disparate platforms such as PC, tablet, phone). A little research in the benefits of web portals (and cloud computing) verses distributed applications will clearly outline the drastic differences. A simple illustrative question (though maybe not a completely fair analogy) is how many people do you know who can code an operating system and how many people get on GoDaddy and create their own web pages. I'm not trying to insinuate that anyone who knows a little HTML can make the web portal changes, however, this isn't a difficult project for an experienced developer.
The bigger issues and ones that I alluded to in my original post are the changes that would be required to Verizon's back-end databases. The changes that would need to be made mostly likely involve multiple databases and assuming they are using a typical relational database design might require changes to key fields, adding new databases/tables, and exhaustive integrity checks. This isn't something that an average user could sit down and accomplish in an hour, however, these are simply the routine day-to-day duties of any professional database developer.
Again I reiterate... this change simply involves allowing someone (either a user, CSR, or other Verizon agent) to readily change an index record or records that correlates Account Owner to cell phone number. In terms of database management this should be simple.
Debugging & Deployment
The debugging/testing of changes made to an Operating System are amazingly complex for all the aforementioned reasons. The deployment of such changes is even more complex in that you've got to develop the mechanism to push these changes out to the entirety of the user community. I'll address deployment (or as you said dispersal) of this change because it's the easiest... quite simply there isn't one. The benefit of having a centralized web portal like My Verizon is that users come to you, not the other way around, and any change made will immediately be accessible by the user community. There is a deployment aspect in that My Verizon doesn't exist on a single web server, but again this is just the typical topology for a portal of this size and not relevant to our discussion. Debugging/Testing is an important aspect of any change and certainly Verizon has this methodology in place, however, I'll reiterate that this change should not be complex and shouldn't require extensive testing. We've also already discussed the fact that any debugging/testing only has to take place on a limited number of platforms.
Downtime
If adding the ability to change the relationship of the Account Owner to an associated cell phone number requires any downtime... the person responsible for Verizon's Development, Beta, and Production environments should be fired. There is simply no way this is even a possible concern. I've dealt with many companies with far less resources than Verizon and I assure you that changes of this nature would never require down time. I'm sure they have staff in place whose sole responsibility is to work on their continuity plan. This is a non issue.
Other Carriers
You can't possibly know how all carriers operate, though you may have some past experience with other companies. I would contend (and maybe I'm too optimistic) that a company with a focus on customer satisfaction when made aware of complaints and/or limitations in their service would seek to rectify the issue. It's quite possible that whatever other company you are referencing has fixed this issue if indeed it was similar... especially since I've hopefully bolstered my opinion that the resolution is not overly complicated.
Would you mind telling me if you deleted your 2 original comments to my post before I had an opportunity to answer? The reason I ask is that last night another user (jimfitzgerald) had posted a comment and I replied. He later posted a 2nd comment and while writing my response... all the posts were removed (his 2 posts, my reply, and your 2 posts). I'm curious if this was just a user withdrawal (though I really wish my response had remained in the thread), if there was some sort of technical issue with these forums last night, or if my response was deleted for cause by Verizon or other admin. Thanks!

Problems With a Second imap Account

Hi Everyone,
I've been using an IMAP account with Gmail and Mail for a few years now, and I've been quite happy with it. (Although it doesn't seem to save messages I send online to my Sent file offline.)
But I've set up a second IMAP account and I have a couple of problems with it.
1) There's no Inbox in Mail. Under the Your Name Gmail heading, it shows All Mail, Drafts, Important, Sent Mail, Spam, Starred, Trash, Personal, Recipts, Travel, and Work. But no Inbox. So everything shows up in All Mail, including spam, duplicates, trash, and mail I send. Needless to say, this is ugly and fairly useless as an Inbox. How do I set up a real Inbox?
2) I can't get rid of anything. I made the mistake of signing up on a few places (Twitter, Ancestry.com, Archives.com), all of which send me endless piles of junk. When I highlight them and delete them they just come back in All Mail. Even when I delete them from Trash. How do I fix this?
I'm running OS 10.6.8 and Mail 4.6.
Any suggestions most appreciated.
Cheers,
Giles

Frank:
To illustrate what Ethmoid described here's how I forward my domain names at GoDaddy.com:
Click to view full size
The top part is for the regular domain name forward and the bottom is for masking if you choose that option. Masking will put only your domain name in the URL window of each of your site's pages. The downside to that is visitors can only bookmark the entry page of your site. My tutorial site, toadstutorials.info, is setup that way.
OT

Problems with certain mail attachments after moving them to a different folder in Mail

I am using Mac Mail as my default email client, and every once in a while when I move a message with an attachment from one folder to another (for example from my Inbox to my Personal folder) in Mail, the attachment will no longer show up, but rather an infinite set of characters.
I know it's a problem with my local Mac Mail client, since:
I can see the attachments perfectly in my webmail
I can see the attachments perfectly in my other Mac's Mail client, as well as on my iPhone and iPad.
This is a sample of what it looks like:
--Apple-Mail-6-682963542
Content-Disposition: inline;
    filename="Opcion 1.png"
Content-Type: image/png;
    x-mac-hide-extension=yes;
    x-unix-mode=0777;
    name="Opcion 1.png"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64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 ideas?

Get info on the drive. What format? FAT drives may be behave erratically for heavy-duty use of the kind you are doing. It's okay to leave a flash drive FAT formatted for light use but for heavy-duty file transfer I think you can encounter issues.
iTunes does not look at files directly. It maintains a database (library.itl) of the files in its collection. When you play a track it looks up where that file is located and goes and plays the file in that location. If you manually move a file or folder used by iTunes that database is no longer correct and you get broken links ( ! ). If you want to move files or folders with iTunes you have to let iTunes do it. Since iTunes is organizing your library there isn't much flexibility in what you can do other than move the whole collection to a different folder by changing the media location preference in preferences.
Lion - Disk Utility - https://discussions.apple.com/message/16925522 - repairing your drive using Disk Utility on Lion's recovery partition.

Problem opening webmail mail on touch 1g

I have no problem signing into my school's webmail on my touch 1g using Safari. I can see the mail headers in my inbox and open other folders on the server. I also can compose and send mail. But I am unable to open mail. When I touch a mail header, it is underlined, but that is all. It fails to open. So I am unable to read my mail. I have no problem like this with webmail on my iMac over the same network. Any suggestions?

It's very strange. No, I haven't noticed any issues with other HTTPS sites. Yahoo mail is the only thing I've had a problem with since the upgrade to FF 30, and even that works fine in other browsers. Thanks for the suggestions.

Problems with webmail on godaddy?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for