Procedure has already been executed [PB 11.5]
I have been having a big issue.
I am using SQL Server 2005 and PowerBuilder 11.5
I have added a call to a procedure (lets say proc1) in my PB app which contains a cursor that calls another procedure (lets say proc2). Proc2 is an intense procedure I use often during the everyday operations of the application. It contains Begin Tran sections.
After Proc1 is being executed, the first time I get to write to the database I get a mysterious "Procedure has already been executed".
The first thing that crossed my mind was that a TRAN has been left uncommitted.
But I did DBCC OPENTRAN and SELECT @@TRANCOUNT during several stages of the operation which, to my disappointment, returned 0. So no open TRAN exists.
Have u guys got a clue of what to look? This thing is making me crazy...
Hi!
My declaration inside PB is:
DECLARE C PROCEDURE FOR proc1;
EXECUTE C;
So this is the declaration of the function which calls Proc1 from inside my PB app.
Inside Proc1 there is a Cursor that calls Proc2 as many times as needed for the operation.
After that...chaos
Similar Messages
-
How to solve the "procedure has not been executed or has no result" error
Recently we are getting the "procedure has not been executed or has no result" error while executing Procedures and Dynamic SQL queries in our PowerBuilder 12.5 Application. Can anyone diagnose the cause of such error messages? Better still can someone help us in finding the resolution for this issue?
Thanks in advance!The Database is SQL Server. Here follows the error details:
ERROR Code: -1
ERROR Text: procedure has not been executed or has no result
Row Count: 0
Terminating application-
I am not even sure if the error is from Database or from Powerbuilder itself. The code is a simple call to a procedure:
DECLARE setRequestStatus PROCEDURE FOR sRequestStatus
// parameters here
USING SQLCA;
EXECUTE setRequestStatus; -
Hi all,
I have created one SP for sending mail with formatting the HTML code inside script whenever i am individually declaring it and printing its expected but the problem at time of executing SP its giving error like this
Msg 132, Level 15, State 1, Line 47
The label 'http' has already been declared. Label names must be unique within a query batch or stored procedure.
what is the possibilities to overcome this problem follwing is my stored procedure code
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[USP_DataLoadMailsend_essRules]
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
SET XACT_ABORT ON;
BEGIN TRY
---BEGIN TRANSACTION T1
DECLARE @packagelogid INT
DECLARE @batchlogid INT
DECLARE @packagestatus CHAR(2)
select @batchlogid =19870
--print(@batchlogid)
DECLARE @script VARCHAR(MAX)
DECLARE @tableHTML VARCHAR(MAX)
DECLARE @mailheader VARCHAR(50)
DECLARE @count INT
DECLARE @recipients1 VARCHAR(50)
DECLARE @subject1 VARCHAR(200)
DECLARE @sql VARCHAR(MAX)
Declare @UserId varchar(Max)
Declare @Information varchar(max)
Declare @TableHTML1 varchar(max)
Declare @TableHTML2 varchar(max)
SET @mailheader = ''
SET @mailheader = (select case
WHEN FileUpload = 'F'
THEN 'BussinessRules is Aborted'
WHEN (InRule = 'S')
AND (
SELECT sum(isnull(ErrorRecords, 0)) tot
FROM abc.FileUploadSummary z
WHERE z.BatchId = bts.BatchId
GROUP BY BatchId
) > 0
THEN 'BussinessRules is Processed with Errors'
WHEN InRule = 'F'
THEN 'BussinessRules is Failed'
WHEN (InRule = 'S')
AND (
SELECT sum(isnull(ErrorRecords, 0)) tot
FROM abc.FileUploadSummary z
WHERE z.BatchId = bts.BatchId
GROUP BY BatchId
) = 0
THEN 'BussinessRules is Succeeded'
end
from abc..BatchStatus bts where BatchId=@batchlogid)
/* Selecting Person Mail as Recipient */
SELECT TOP 1 @recipients1 = EmailId FROM abc.PersonEmail
WHERE PersonId = ( SELECT TOP 1 personid FROM abc.FileUploadSummary WHERE BatchId = @batchlogid )AND EmailTypeId = 1
/* Selecting UserId*/
select top 1 @UserId=loginid from abc.FUS where BatchId=@batchlogid
/*Selecting Information about the Status */
Set @Information=
(select case
WHEN FileUpload = 'F'
THEN 'BussinessRules is Aborted'
WHEN (InRule = 'S')
AND (
SELECT sum(isnull(ErrorRecords, 0)) tot
FROM abc.FileUploadSummary z
WHERE z.BatchId = bts.BatchId
GROUP BY BatchId
) > 0
THEN 'BussinessRules is Processed with Errors'
WHEN InRule = 'F'
THEN 'BussinessRules is Failed'
WHEN (InRule = 'S')
AND (
SELECT sum(isnull(ErrorRecords, 0)) tot
FROM abc.FileUploadSummary z
WHERE z.BatchId = bts.BatchId
GROUP BY BatchId
) = 0
THEN 'BussinessRules is Succeeded'
end + N' <br> <B>BatchId= '+ convert(varchar(250),(select @batchlogid)) +'</B>'
from abc..BatchStatus bts where BatchId=@batchlogid )
/*Selecting the Error Reason*/
if exists (select 1 from BatchStatus where BatchId=@batchlogid and ( InRule='f'))
begin
set @TableHTML1 = '<table border=1><tr><th>Sr.No.</th><th><P>Error Reason :</th></tr>'+
cast((select td= ROW_NUMBER()over (order by (select 1)),'',
td=isnull(e.ErrorDescription, '')
from abc.x.tbPackageErrorLog e --50594
join abc.x.tbPackageLog p -- 10223
on p.PackageLogID=e.PackageLogID
where p.BatchLogID= @batchlogid FOR XML PATH('tr'), TYPE )
as NVarchar(max)) +'</table>'
-- print @tableHTML
if not exists (select 1 from BatchStatus where BatchId=@batchlogid and ( InRule='f'))
set @TableHTML2 = 'Error Reason :N/A'
end
-- insert into #tmp values ( @TableHTML1)
--select * from #tmp
Set @tableHTML= 'Hello '+@UserId+', <br>Information:'+isnull(@Information,'') +
'<Table Border=1><Tr><th>Sr No</th><th>Uploaded files </th>:'+
CAST ((select td= ROW_NUMBER()over(order by f.FileUploadId), '',
td = f.TableName , ''
from abc.FileUploadSummary F where BatchId=@batchlogid
FOR XML PATH('tr'), TYPE ) AS NVARCHAR(max) )
+'</table>'+
'Error Reason :'+isnull(isnull(@TableHTML1,'')+ isnull(@TableHTML2,''),'N/A')+ --concat (isnull(@TableHTML1,''),isnull(@TableHTML2,'')
'<br> Please login to Your Account for further Details..!'
+'<br>@Note: This is system generated message, Do not reply to this mail. <br>Regards,<br>'+
'Admin'
print @tableHTML
SET @sql = ' EXEC msdb.dbo.sp_send_dbmail @profile_name = ''DBA_mail_test''
,@recipients = ''' + isnull(@recipients1,'''') + ''',@subject = ''' + isnull(@mailheader,'''') + ''',
@body = ''' +isnull(@tableHTML,'''')+ ''',
@body_format = ''HTML'''
Exec(@sql)
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
PRINT error_message()
-- Test whether the transaction is uncommittable.
-- IF (XACT_STATE()) = - 1
-- ROLLBACK TRANSACTION --Comment it if SP contains only select statement
DECLARE @ErrorFromProc VARCHAR(500)
DECLARE @ErrorMessage VARCHAR(1000)
DECLARE @SeverityLevel INT
SELECT @ErrorFromProc = ERROR_PROCEDURE()
,@ErrorMessage = ERROR_MESSAGE()
,@SeverityLevel = ERROR_SEVERITY()
--INSERT INTO dbo.ErrorLogForUSP (
-- ErrorFromProc
-- ,ErrorMessage
-- ,SeverityLevel
-- ,DateTimeStamp
--VALUES (
-- @ErrorFromProc
-- ,@ErrorMessage
-- ,@SeverityLevel
-- ,GETDATE()
END CATCH
END
please help me to solve this problem
Niraj SevalkarThis is no string http in your procedure. Then again the error message points to a line 47 outside a stored procedure. I can't tell it is outside, since there is no procedure name.
But I see that you have this piece of dynamic SQL:
SET @sql = ' EXEC msdb.dbo.sp_send_dbmail @profile_name = ''DBA_mail_test''
,@recipients = ''' + isnull(@recipients1,'''') + ''',@subject = ''' + isnull(@mailheader,'''') + ''',
@body = ''' +isnull(@tableHTML,'''')+ ''',
@body_format = ''HTML'''
Exec(@sql)
Why is this dynamic SQL at all? Why not just make plain call to sp_send_dbmail?
EXEC msdb.dbo.sp_send_dbmail @profile_name = 'DBA_mail_test'
,@recipients = @recipients1, @subject = @mailheader, @body = @tableHTML
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected] -
Upgrade 4.5B to 4.7 -- ERROR: "VBAK has already been declared".
Dear Friends,
After upgrade 4.5B to 4.7, there is the same ERROR when executing most of SD transaction and creating/displaying/modifying PO and GR.
This error is related to SD pricing procedure. In the ABAP error dump said that: VBAK has already been declared. I have tried to look for SAP Notes but cannot find one.
I think this problem is a common problem in upgrading from 4.X to 4.7. Need help from you guys who ever have upgrading experience.. : )
Does anyone know on how to FIX this problem?
Cheers,
Will
THE ABAP DUMP is as below:
===============================================
Syntax error in program "SAPLV61A ".
What happened?
The following syntax error occurred in the program SAPLV61A :
""VBAK" has already been declared."
Error in ABAP application program.
The current ABAP program "SAPLMEPO" had to be terminated because one of the
statements could not be executed.
This is probably due to an error in the ABAP program.
What can you do?
Please eliminate the error by performing a syntax check
(or an extended program check) on the program "SAPLV61A ".
You can also perform the syntax check from the ABAP/4 Editor.
If the problem persists, proceed as follows:
Print out the error message (using the "Print" function)
and make a note of the actions and input that caused the
error.
To resolve the problem, contact your SAP system administrator.
You can use transaction ST22 (ABAP Dump Analysis) to view and administer
termination messages, especially those beyond their normal deletion
date.
Error analysis
The following syntax error was found in the program SAPLV61A :
""VBAK" has already been declared."
How to correct the error
Probably the only way to eliminate the error is to correct the program.
If you cannot solve the problem yourself, please send the
following documents to SAP:
1. A hard copy print describing the problem.
To obtain this, select the "Print" function on the current screen.
2. A suitable hardcopy prinout of the system log.
To obtain this, call the system log with Transaction SM21
and select the "Print" function to print out the relevant
part.
3. If the programs are your own programs or modified SAP programs,
supply the source code.
To do this, you can either use the "PRINT" command in the editor or
print the programs using the report RSINCL00.
4. Details regarding the conditions under which the error occurred
or which actions and input led to the error.
Information on where terminated
The termination occurred in the ABAP program "SAPLMEPO" in "REFRESH_TABLES".
The main program was "RM_MEPO_GUI ".
The termination occurred in line 35 of the source code of the (Include)
program "MM06EF0R_REFRESH_TABLES"
of the source code of program "MM06EF0R_REFRESH_TABLES" (when calling the
editor 350).
===============================================Check OSS Note 133433 is exactly axplain your problems
will resolve your problems -
8Z 775 Error Asset ... has already been revaluated; no futher postings can
Hi gurus,
I wrote because I have a problem with transaction J1AI.
I'm from Chile and I'm working with 8.928 assets in SAP R/3 6.0.
My problem is when I run J1AI transaction just 7.600 assets are
revaluated, but 1.328 have the following message:
Asset xxxxx has already been revaluated; no futher postings can be made
Message no. 8Z775
Diagnosis
+You have already revaluated asset xxxx (subnumber xxx). You cannot make
a difference posting in the period you have chosen, either because the
asset has already reached the end of its useful life or you have changed
the useful life in the asset master.+
Procedure
+The values that you are trying to post would lead to inconsistencies in
the system. It is possible that you may have recently changed the
Customizing data or asset master data. However, if you still wish to
proceed with the posting, reverse the accounting documents for the period
in question and execute the Asset Revaluation program again.+
The problem is that I've not made changes in the Customizing or in the
asset master data.
I've been looking a SAP Note but I didn't find anything. Somebody of you can give me a hand?
Greetings MarcoDear Marco,
Please check few things as under:
1. Normally the document which get posted appears in Asset Exploer AW01N.
2. Transaction J1AI has a optioon to post directly or through batch input, in case of batch input it creates a batch input session which one has to execute in transaction SM35. If you no one has executed SM35 session would essentially mean, no entry got posted.
3. If someone has posted directly without batch input then you can check the postings througn table ANEK by inputing Company Code and user who has posted it.
4. Also similarly you can check BKPF table for FI postings.
5. You can also check SM35 about the sessions as it is available even after the transaction got posted thourgh sessions execution.
Not withstanding the above, it appears that no documnets have been posted yet otherwise it would have appear in the asset.
If the above does not resolve your issue then perheps one need system access to check the possibility, advise you to raise with SAP through OSS message.
Thanks!!!
Murlidhar Khatri -
Send a request to a conversation that has already been finished
This error continually occurs. Any idea why?
An attempt was made to send a request to conversation id []:169.254.17.244-b61346.100533c48f4.-7fea-gend.
This is not a valid conversation id. The most common cause of this exception is an attempt to send a request to a conversation that has already been finished.
Work around is to restart WLS and maybe this time it will not happen. WLS 8.1SP3.
From: [email protected] ([email protected])
Subject: Weblogic Tutorial Question - Need help
This is the only article in this thread
View: Original Format
Newsgroups: weblogic.developer.interest.jms
Date: 2004-09-17 09:12:33 PST
Hi guys,
I'm a Weblogic newbie. I have started working with Weblogic Workshop's
Tutorial. I find them interesting and easy to follow. All was going
well until I reached the Step 4 (Add a JMS Control). The url to this
page is:
http://edocs.bea.com/workshop/docs81/doc/en/workshop/reference/navResources.html
After completing this tutorial to the end I get all the results
mentioned, but I get additional error messages like these in my
InvestigateTest.jws Web Service client:
1095373714829
investigate:creditScoreJMS:listener.onMessage
External Service Callback investigate:creditScoreJMS:listener.onMessage
Submitted at Friday, September 17, 2004 10:25:52 AM EDT
Executable Request:Callback.onMessage
ConversationNotFound Exception
Submitted at Friday, September 17, 2004 10:25:52 AM EDT
An attempt was made to send a request to conversation id 1095373714829.
This is not a valid conversation id. The most common cause of this
exception is an attempt to send a request to a conversation that has
already been finished.
Request Cancelled
Submitted at Friday, September 17, 2004 10:25:52 AM EDT
Processing Request
Submitted at Friday, September 17, 2004 10:25:53 AM EDT
Request Complete
Submitted at Friday, September 17, 2004 10:25:53 AM EDT
I cannot figure out why I'm getting these. I'm doing everything as
described in the Tutorial. Can somebody tell me what I'm doing wrong.
I would greatly appreciate.
Thanks.
Adnanhi
We just encountered this problem while load testing using JMeter. While it may not be the same scenario, we have found that we can consistently trigger this error if:
a) multiple threads from the same client are invoking the service (i.e. a JMeter using JavaSamplerClient can do this)
b) the web service is conversational according to the polling design pattern recommended in the WLW doco: i.e.
startQuery()(one-way) conversation phase = start
checkQueryStatus() conversation phase = continue
fetchQueryResponse()conversation phase = finish
c) buffering is enabled for the startQuery() operation.
d) the number of threads > 3 (might occur very infrequently <= 3 - cant remember)
This is reproducable in our WLS/WLW 8.1 SP2/SP3 environment.
With buffering enabled - errors occur
With buffering not enabled - no errors
On reflection, buffering isn't really needed for our usage so we removed it, however the errors might indicate a bug or unsupported use case
Regards
Jim Nicolson -
"URl has already been reserved".
Reporting services for port 80 and 443 works fine both for reports and reportingserver on SQL server 2008 R2. But when I try to upgrade from SQL server 2008 R2 to 2012 this error pops up. How to make sure before upgrading regarding reporting services that
URL reserves and SSL are fine or how to fix reporting services are upgrade like repair install.
ThanksHi yashmitl,
In your case, please running the following command to check the current URL reservations on http.sys.
netsh http show urlacl
Then, please delete the URL reservation by executing the following command try to resolve the issue.
netsh http delete urlacl <url>
There is a similar issue, you can refer to it.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/d5204dd3-e26d-4592-8ef0-a94005fc46a5/the-url-has-already-been-reserved?forum=sqlreportingservices
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Alisa Tang
Alisa Tang
TechNet Community Support -
Document number in company code and fiscal year has already been
Hello,
While doing a PGI of a delivery in VL02N transaction, I am receiving a dump with the above message in the subject.
Short text of error message:
Document number 6200 4900000020 2010 was already assigned
Long text of error message:
Diagnosis
Document number 4900000020 in company code 6200 and fiscal year
2010 has already been assigned.
System Response
Termination of processing.
Procedure
Check document number range 49 in company code 6200 and fiscal year
2010 and correct the number range status if necessary.
I am not sure of the way the number range clearing in SM56. I need to know the object and subobject for the delivery number for the same.
Does anybody knows about it ?What would be the object and subobject for a delivery number entered in VL02N transaction ?
There are many objects present in VL02N transaction but I am not able to figure out the real one which is needed.
Please help me with the same. -
RJVM has already been shutdown error while looking upto Foreign Server
Hi,
I am trying to set up 2 new servers in a clustered environment. In this I have configured a Foreign Server which is looking up to queues in different server.
The structure is like this: 1 Foreign Server with 2 Queues and 1 Connection factory with exactly same name as they present on the host server.
While starting the server, I am getting an exception:
<Nov 5, 2012 7:39:58 PM EET> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-010061> <The Message-Driven EJB: ClonedQueueAnonymousWaiter is unable to connect to the JMS destination: MDB_QUEUE_RESPONSE. The Error was:
javax.naming.CommunicationException [Root exception is java.rmi.UnmarshalException: RJVM has already been shutdown; nested exception is:
java.io.IOException: RJVM has already been shutdown]
at weblogic.jndi.internal.ExceptionTranslator.toNamingException(ExceptionTranslator.java:74)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.WLContextImpl.translateException(WLContextImpl.java:470)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.WLContextImpl.lookup(WLContextImpl.java:426)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.WLContextImpl.lookup(WLContextImpl.java:411)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:392)
at weblogic.deployment.jms.ForeignOpaqueReference.getReferent(ForeignOpaqueReference.java:221)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.WLNamingManager.getObjectInstance(WLNamingManager.java:96)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.ServerNamingNode.resolveObject(ServerNamingNode.java:377)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.resolveObject(BasicNamingNode.java:856)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.lookup(BasicNamingNode.java:209)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.WLEventContextImpl.lookup(WLEventContextImpl.java:254)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.WLContextImpl.lookup(WLContextImpl.java:411)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:392)
at weblogic.jms.common.CDS$2.run(CDS.java:486)
at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
at weblogic.jms.common.CrossDomainSecurityManager.runAs(CrossDomainSecurityManager.java:131)
at weblogic.jms.common.CDS.lookupDestination(CDS.java:480)
at weblogic.jms.common.CDS.lookupDDAndCalloutListener(CDS.java:345)
at weblogic.jms.common.CDS.access$100(CDS.java:41)
at weblogic.jms.common.CDS$DDListenerRegistrationTimerListener.timerExpired(CDS.java:193)
at weblogic.timers.internal.TimerImpl.run(TimerImpl.java:273)
at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:528)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:207)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:176)
Caused by: java.rmi.UnmarshalException: RJVM has already been shutdown; nested exception is:
java.io.IOException: RJVM has already been shutdown
at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableRemoteRef.invoke(ClusterableRemoteRef.java:360)
at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableRemoteRef.invoke(ClusterableRemoteRef.java:259)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.ServerNamingNode_1034_WLStub.lookup(Unknown Source)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.WLContextImpl.lookup(WLContextImpl.java:423)
... 21 more
Caused by: java.io.IOException: RJVM has already been shutdown
at weblogic.rjvm.ResponseImpl.unmarshalReturn(ResponseImpl.java:234)
at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableRemoteRef.invoke(ClusterableRemoteRef.java:348)
... 24 more
Caused by: java.io.IOException: RJVM has already been shutdown
at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.addPendingResponse(RJVMImpl.java:513)
at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.send(RJVMImpl.java:900)
at weblogic.rjvm.MsgAbbrevOutputStream.flushAndSend(MsgAbbrevOutputStream.java:394)
at weblogic.rjvm.MsgAbbrevOutputStream.sendRecv(MsgAbbrevOutputStream.java:404)
at weblogic.rjvm.BasicOutboundRequest.sendReceive(BasicOutboundRequest.java:109)
at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableRemoteRef.invoke(ClusterableRemoteRef.java:345)
... 24 more
>
Weblogic is installed in Solaris machine and welogic's version is 10.3.4.0 with Java version 1.6.0 update 33. I have checked the firewall, /etc/hosts but there are no issues with that.
The JNDI Connection URL is configure like: t3://xx.xxx.x.xx,xx.xxx.x.xx:7001/
I have tried giving like this also: t3://xx.xxx.x.xx:7001,xx.xxx.x.xx:7001/ or t3://hostname1,hostname2:7001/ or t3://hostname1:7001,hostname2:7001/
but nothing worked.
The foreign servers are accessible from my Application Server when I do the telnet on the port. There is no cross domain security required. Funny thing is I have a same set-up in two other application server (in cluster again) and there on configuring the Foreign server to same IPs, I am not facing any issues at all.
Can anyone please help me with this. Searched all over the place but have no clue regarding this. Many forums mentioned about firewall and etc/hosts but that is also not case it seems.
Regards,
Priyam809364 wrote:
You can apply the below debug flags to check t he RJVM Communication in detail and figure out what's going wrong and do apply it at both the side
-Dweblogic.kernel.debug=true
-Dweblogic.debug.DebugConnection=true
-Dweblogic.StdoutDebugEnabled=true
-Dweblogic.log.LogSeverity=Debug
-Dweblogic.log.LoggerSeverity=DebugI added the debug as you mentioned and I get the below information there:
<Nov 6, 2012 11:41:16 AM EET> <Debug> <RJVM> <BEA-000500> <RJVMFinder trying to find rjvm for t3://moon1,moon2:7001->moon1,moon2:[7001, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1]->[]
Active RJVMs:
{-8968250770921317063S:10.160.1.115:[7001,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:fcdb_domain:AdminServer on [10.160.1.115:7001]=weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl@4320d68d - id: '-8968250770921317063S:10.160.1.115:[7001,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:fcdb_domain:AdminServer' connect time: 'Tue Nov 06 11:40:26 EET 2012'}
Synonyms:
{}>
<Nov 6, 2012 11:41:17 AM EET> <Debug> <RJVM> <BEA-000500> <Bootstrapping connection to: 'moon1/10.160.1.40:7001' using: 't3'>
<Nov 6, 2012 11:41:17 AM EET> <Debug> <RJVM> <BEA-000500> <Looking for a new connection for channel Default[t3]:t3(t3):venus1:7001:null:-1 to remote server 0B:10.160.1.40:[7001,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1] active connections: {}>
<Nov 6, 2012 11:41:17 AM EET> <Debug> <RJVM> <BEA-000500> <New connection for protocol t3, remote address moon1/10.160.1.40, remote port 7001, over channel Default[t3]>
<Nov 6, 2012 11:41:17 AM EET> <Debug> <RJVM> <BEA-000500> <Added: 'Default[t3]:t3(t3):venus1:7001:null:-1' connection: 'weblogic.rjvm.t3.MuxableSocketT3$T3MsgAbbrevJVMConnection@7582aacf'. Connections list size 1>
<Nov 6, 2012 11:41:17 AM EET> <Debug> <RJVM> <BEA-000500> <Bootstrapping using a: 't3', connection to: 'moon1/10.160.1.40' on port: '7001'>
<Nov 6, 2012 11:41:17 AM EET> <Debug> <RJVM> <BEA-000500> <Created RJVM for: '-3712802650201056847S:10.160.1.40:[7001,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:fcj_domain:ManagedServer1 on [10.160.1.40:7001]', Active RJVMs:
{-8968250770921317063S:10.160.1.115:[7001,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:fcdb_domain:AdminServer on [10.160.1.115:7001]=weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl@4320d68d - id: '-8968250770921317063S:10.160.1.115:[7001,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:fcdb_domain:AdminServer' connect time: 'Tue Nov 06 11:40:26 EET 2012', -3712802650201056847S:10.160.1.40:[7001,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:fcj_domain:ManagedServer1 on [10.160.1.40:7001]=weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl@7bb8a8c6 - id: '-3712802650201056847S:10.160.1.40:[7001,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:fcj_domain:ManagedServer1' connect time: 'Tue Nov 06 11:41:17 EET 2012'}
Synonyms:
{}>
<Nov 6, 2012 11:41:17 AM EET> <Debug> <RJVM> <BEA-000500> <Remote heartbeat: '60000', local heartbeat: '60000'>
<Nov 6, 2012 11:41:17 AM EET> <Debug> <RJVM> <BEA-000500> <Setting heartbeat for RJVM: '-3712802650201056847S:10.160.1.40:[7001,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:fcj_domain:ManagedServer1' to: '60000' milliseconds>
<Nov 6, 2012 11:41:17 AM EET> <Debug> <RJVM> <BEA-000500> <Added: 'Default[t3]:t3(t3):venus1:7001:null:-1' connection: 'weblogic.rjvm.t3.MuxableSocketT3$T3MsgAbbrevJVMConnection@7582aacf'. Connections list size 1>
<Nov 6, 2012 11:41:17 AM EET> <Debug> <RJVM> <BEA-000517> <Error on connection: 'weblogic.rjvm.t3.MuxableSocketT3$T3MsgAbbrevJVMConnection@7582aacf'
java.io.EOFException
java.io.EOFException
at weblogic.rjvm.t3.MuxableSocketT3.endOfStream(MuxableSocketT3.java:345)
at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.deliverExceptionAndCleanup(SocketMuxer.java:826)
at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.deliverEndOfStream(SocketMuxer.java:760)
at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.readReadySocketOnce(SocketMuxer.java:941)
at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.readReadySocket(SocketMuxer.java:898)
at weblogic.socket.DevPollSocketMuxer.processSockets(DevPollSocketMuxer.java:126)
at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.run(SocketReaderRequest.java:29)
at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:42)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:145)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:117)
>
<Nov 6, 2012 11:41:17 AM EET> <Debug> <RJVM> <BEA-000500> <Signaling peer: '-3712802650201056847S:10.160.1.40:[7001,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:fcj_domain:ManagedServer1' gone - weblogic.rjvm.PeerGoneException: ; nested exception is:
java.io.EOFException>
<Nov 6, 2012 11:41:17 AM EET> <Debug> <RJVM> <BEA-000500> <Closed and removed: 't3' connection to: '-3712802650201056847S:10.160.1.40:[7001,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:fcj_domain:ManagedServer1'. Connections list size 0>
<Nov 6, 2012 11:41:17 AM EET> <Debug> <RJVM> <BEA-000500> <Closing: '-3712802650201056847S:10.160.1.40:[7001,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:fcj_domain:ManagedServer1'>
<Nov 6, 2012 11:41:17 AM EET> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-010061> <The Message-Driven EJB: ClonedQueueAnonymousWaiter is unable to connect to the JMS destination: MDB_QUEUE_RESPONSE. The Error was:
javax.naming.CommunicationException [Root exception is weblogic.rjvm.PeerGoneException: ; nested exception is:
java.io.EOFException]
at weblogic.jndi.internal.ExceptionTranslator.toNamingException(ExceptionTranslator.java:74)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.WLContextImpl.translateException(WLContextImpl.java:470)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.WLContextImpl.lookup(WLContextImpl.java:426)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.WLContextImpl.lookup(WLContextImpl.java:411)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:392)
at weblogic.deployment.jms.ForeignOpaqueReference.getReferent(ForeignOpaqueReference.java:221)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.WLNamingManager.getObjectInstance(WLNamingManager.java:96)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.ServerNamingNode.resolveObject(ServerNamingNode.java:377)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.resolveObject(BasicNamingNode.java:856)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.BasicNamingNode.lookup(BasicNamingNode.java:209)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.WLEventContextImpl.lookup(WLEventContextImpl.java:254)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.WLContextImpl.lookup(WLContextImpl.java:411)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:392)
at weblogic.jms.common.CDS$2.run(CDS.java:486)
at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
at weblogic.jms.common.CrossDomainSecurityManager.runAs(CrossDomainSecurityManager.java:131)
at weblogic.jms.common.CDS.lookupDestination(CDS.java:480)
at weblogic.jms.common.CDS.lookupDDAndCalloutListener(CDS.java:345)
at weblogic.jms.common.CDS.access$100(CDS.java:41)
at weblogic.jms.common.CDS$DDListenerRegistrationTimerListener.timerExpired(CDS.java:193)
at weblogic.timers.internal.TimerImpl.run(TimerImpl.java:273)
at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:528)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:207)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:176)
Caused by: weblogic.rjvm.PeerGoneException: ; nested exception is:
java.io.EOFException
at weblogic.rjvm.ResponseImpl.unmarshalReturn(ResponseImpl.java:234)
at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableRemoteRef.invoke(ClusterableRemoteRef.java:348)
at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableRemoteRef.invoke(ClusterableRemoteRef.java:259)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.ServerNamingNode_1034_WLStub.lookup(Unknown Source)
at weblogic.jndi.internal.WLContextImpl.lookup(WLContextImpl.java:423)
... 21 more
Caused by: java.io.EOFException
at weblogic.rjvm.t3.MuxableSocketT3.endOfStream(MuxableSocketT3.java:345)
at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.deliverExceptionAndCleanup(SocketMuxer.java:826)
at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.deliverEndOfStream(SocketMuxer.java:760)
at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.readReadySocketOnce(SocketMuxer.java:941)
at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.readReadySocket(SocketMuxer.java:898)
at weblogic.socket.DevPollSocketMuxer.processSockets(DevPollSocketMuxer.java:126)
at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.run(SocketReaderRequest.java:29)
at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:42)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:145)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:117)
>
Seems like Peer gone exception is the root cause of this. Any idea for this ?
Regards,
Priyam
Edited by: Priyam Srivastava on Nov 6, 2012 2:49 AM -
Get this error: It appears that the feed has already been submitted
I have a podcast named Thorborgs Talkshow.
It was listed in iTunes but Feedburner changed URL's and now I just can't find my show and when i submit my URL:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/thorborgstalkshow
I get the: It appears that the feed has already been submitted
What can I do?
Cheers
MartiniTunes knows your podcast only from the feed, not from anything else. If you try to submit from a new URL then iTunes sees this as a new podcast, and if it has the same name as an existing podcast then it will not permit it. There is a procedure for changing a feed's URL:
http://www.apple.com/itunes/whatson/podcasts/specs.html#changing
but it requires you to have access to the original feed in order to add a tag to it instructing iTunes to move to a new feed.
You have only two alternatives: add this tag to the old feed - which knowing Feedburner is likely to be difficult if not impossible: or submit the new feed URL with a slightly changed Title.
However I do think that Feedburner ought to explain to you what they've been playing at, and it does sound as if you may have legitimate grounds for protesting to them and asking them to sort it out - though I can't predict the likelihood of success in this. -
Simple Entity Bean JWS fails: Connection has already been created in this tx context
I am new to Weblogic Workshop 8.1, and trying to create an EntityBean from a pre-existing
database table.
I get an error that indicates the JWS is using the default cgPool rather then
my new pool for some transaction.
I added my database (DB2) pool and data source, and then created an entity bean
using "New Entity Bean from database table.
I then wrapped this Entity Bean in a control and generated a JWS.
When I run the JWS and execute FindByPrimaryKey, I get the following error:
Submitted at Friday, April 2, 2004 11:07:30 AM CST
<error>
<faultcode>JWSError</faultcode>
<faultstring>Couldn't get connection:
java.sql.SQLException: Connection has already been created in this tx context
for pool named cgPool. Illegal attempt to create connection from another pool:
ATGW_POOL
java.sql.SQLException: Connection has already been created in this tx context
for pool named cgPool. Illegal attempt to create connection from another pool:
ATGW_POOL
at weblogic.jdbc.jts.Driver.getExistingConnection(Driver.java:410)
at weblogic.jdbc.jts.Driver.connect(Driver.java:141)I am new to Weblogic Workshop 8.1, and trying to create an EntityBean from a pre-existing
database table.
I get an error that indicates the JWS is using the default cgPool rather then
my new pool for some transaction.
I added my database (DB2) pool and data source, and then created an entity bean
using "New Entity Bean from database table.
I then wrapped this Entity Bean in a control and generated a JWS.
When I run the JWS and execute FindByPrimaryKey, I get the following error:
Submitted at Friday, April 2, 2004 11:07:30 AM CST
<error>
<faultcode>JWSError</faultcode>
<faultstring>Couldn't get connection:
java.sql.SQLException: Connection has already been created in this tx context
for pool named cgPool. Illegal attempt to create connection from another pool:
ATGW_POOL
java.sql.SQLException: Connection has already been created in this tx context
for pool named cgPool. Illegal attempt to create connection from another pool:
ATGW_POOL
at weblogic.jdbc.jts.Driver.getExistingConnection(Driver.java:410)
at weblogic.jdbc.jts.Driver.connect(Driver.java:141) -
WLS 9.2: Interpreting the error - This RJVM has already been shutdown
Hi,
I have encountered the error message (stacktrace below) in one of the managed servers of my Weblogic 9.2 cluster (containing 4 managed servers). There are ALSB proxies consuming and producing to JMS distributed queues on the cluster.
The server reporting this error (server01_01) is complaining about the Remote JVM of the other servers (server01_02, 02_01, 02_02) being shutdown, but what I have observed is that server01_01 was killed by the Nodemanager(may be due to failure or being unavailable).
I would like to know:
1) When does this error occur usually?
2) How is it different from "weblogic.jms.common.LostServerException: [JMSClientExceptions:055169]Network connection to server was lost."?
3) Why did I get an error complaining about the other healthy servers when actually the problem is with the server reporting the error?
Any hints are appreciated.
+####<Mar 26, 2009 11:44:08 AM EST> <Warning> <RMI> <ifappd111d-v04t> <+server01_01+> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '37' for queue:+
+'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1238028248453> <BEA-080006> <Failed to associate the transaction context with the response while marshalling an exception to the client:+
java.rmi.ConnectException: This RJVM has already been shutdown -3786093667493708317S:ifappd112d-v04t:[8003,8003,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:ifappd111d-v04t:8003,ifappd112d-v04t:8003,ifappd111d-v04t:8005,ifappd112d-v04t:8005:domServiceBus:server02_01.
java.rmi.ConnectException: This RJVM has already been shutdown -3786093667493708317S:ifappd112d-v04t:[8003,8003,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:ifappd111d-v04t:8003,ifappd112d-v04t:8003,ifappd111d-v04t:8005,ifappd112d-v04t:8005:domServiceBus:*server02_01*+
at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.getOutputStream(RJVMImpl.java:336)
at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.getResponseStream(RJVMImpl.java:679)
at weblogic.rjvm.MsgAbbrevInputStream.getMsgAbbrevOutputStream(MsgAbbrevInputStream.java:275)
at weblogic.rjvm.MsgAbbrevInputStream.getOutboundResponse(MsgAbbrevInputStream.java:534)
at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.postInvoke(BasicServerRef.java:599)
at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:453)
at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.access$300(BasicServerRef.java:57)
at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$BasicExecuteRequest.run(BasicServerRef.java:965)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:181)EJB keep traks of Bea CLUSTER using JVMID as an identifier of each manged server's JVM. When this JVMID is no longer valid, you can see "JVM is already been shutdowm" as client exception. This issue happen when, on client side, EJB can't recognize server side JVM shutdown. In WLS 8.1 there was a PATCH to solve this problem. Ask to Bea support if you need a patch also for WLS 9.2.
Regards -
9006Connection has already been closed
I am using WL server 6.1 SP2 with Apache plugin. I am continuously getting the
following message in my app server log
9006Connection has already been closed.
Any ideas what is causing this message?
ThanksHi,
Problem might be that your statement times out or your connection is getting closed when the statement executes.
--Sushant -
Hi
he process could not be created because the maximum number of asynchronous responses (5) has already been reached, and it will be dropped.
Command executed: "C:\WINDOWS\system32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell.exe" -command "&G:\SCOM\SCOMModule\Notification\SMS.ps1 -scomalertid:'{c5a013e7-5408-468a-9b04-febab33cc56d}' -alertname:'Common Primary Database TableSpace
Threshold Alert' -alertdesc:'TableSpace TEMP FreeSizePercent:0.4375\n' -alertstate:'Closed' -alerttime:'7/26/2014 1:55:19 PM' -Priority:'1' -Severity:'2'"
Working Directory: g:\SCOM\SCOMModule\Notification
One or more workflows were affected by this.
Workflow name: Subscription852fbf70_40eb_450c_874d_46b631ca1352
Instance name: Alert Notification Subscription Server
Instance ID: {E07E3FAB-53BC-BC14-1634-5A6E949F9230}
Management group:******
Please help me
ThanksHi,
the RMS is "Root Management Server". When you install first management server it becomes RMS. The RMS is relevant in SCOM 2007x management group. You can identify which server is RMS in administration console under management server view. Look for instance
with "yes" value in "Is RMS" column.
If you have SCOM 2012x version management group create sugested registry entrys on all management servers (MS) which executes command channel.
This will surely solve your
problem.
Regards,
Ivan -
ChaRM: Incorrect message "request has already been released"
Hello experts!
I have a fresh working ChaRM implementation and facing an error that SOMETIMES happens. ChaRM cannot release a transport request, with all tasks released, and an error message is shown in SCMA:
"Transport request DLDK959614 can no longer be changed
Message no. /TMWFLOW/TRANSPORT_N643
Diagnosis
The request DLDK959614 has already been released.
System Response
The system does not allow you to create a transport of copies.
Procedure
It is not usually necessary to create a transport of copies for a request that has already been released. Perhaps you entered an incorrect request, in which case you have to enter a different one."
In fact the transport request IS NOT REALESED. The workaround I am using is to momentarily allow the "manual" release via SE09. And then I follow the normal process until reach the production environment.
I could not find anything wrong with those transport orders. The only fact that made me think a while is that a new task list was created.
Does anyone have a clue?
Thanks!HI Jose,
DO you have solution for this issue, I am getting same error
Dinesh
Maybe you are looking for
-
Help
-
I have the lastest version of quicktime program and plug-in. It was playing videos from other sites (like youtube and all other stuff) normally. But I did something that quicktime does not play anymore. it appears its symbol and a "?" with it. I have
-
Reading and processing high freq data in different processes
I am trying to create a program to receive raw data from UDP - EGD protocol, process the raw data then write data to file. The max transfer rate is 100 Hz and when running at this frequency the program cannot seem to process the data quicly enough to
-
Non existant videos in iTunes/iPad
In iTunes, when my iPad is connected, it says that I have 5 unwatched TV shows. These shows don't exist in iTunes, nor are they actually on my iPad. I have tried mulitpul times to delete these files. They delete, but then show up the next time I syn
-
When I drag photos from my desktop to the new Photos icon, they don't replace the previously imported photos in "Last Import".