Production and MRP issues

Issue-1
i have sales BOM for my main item in which components are production item where they have production BOM, i want to create a multiple production orders for my components based on my sales item is it possible to get it with SDK

Hai
Thanks for your kind reply, i am also aware we can make many production orders with the help of MRP, but if i am not using MRP can i do some cahnges with the help of SDK and create multilevel production orders
Thanks and Regards
Boopathi

Similar Messages

CO11n Operation and MRP issue

Dear All
1. I have a query when i am doing confirmation production order CO11N at that time i am doing manually but at the time of goods movement i am unable to see my materials please help for this
2. When i am converting planned order to production order at that time i am unable to get the default Order type its throwing an error enter order type
pavan

Hi,
1. I have a query when i am doing confirmation production order CO11N at that time i am doing manually but at the time of goods movement i am unable to see my materials please help for this
Goods Movement
Maintain in OPK4 as ALL COMPONENTS-this is for automatic goods receipt and automatic goos issue.
now create new production order and while doing confirmation go to goods movement tab-now you will see that raw material and finished material.
2.When i am converting planned order to production order at that time i am unable to get the default Order type its throwing an error enter order type .
Create Production scheduling Profile(OPKP) in spro-Maintain in order type in make to order or make to stock enter respective order type and save.
Assign this Production scheduling Profile in respective material master in work scheduling view.
now it will works.
Regards,
S.Ananth

SAP : ECC 6.0 Module : Production and MM Issue : Monthly and Yearly targets

SAP : ECC 6.0
Module : FICO
Issue : Payment Mode and Type
Domain : Chemicals
How to Trap Bank Receipts / Bank Payments Mode of payment and doc no
Ex : Any bank Receipt We need to enter the Mode of Receipt : Chq/ DD/ Order and Also need to enter the Instrument details
In SAP standard F-28 form shows does not have the details to enter.
What is the best approach to trap this in case of receipts and payments.

Sreekanth
Thanks for the reply
If you want to maintain Cheque no., DD, etc.. You can enter those in assignment field or text field, While Document display you can see it in report.
So this assignment filed can be used for All the DD-Chq details ?
The information can queried on the Assignment field also ?

E-Commerce Product and Shipping Issues

Hi All
I have a customer who has got 12 shipping options.
They want the ability to go against their items and enter values of between 1 - 12 (1 = Free / 12 = 24.95). Can we use one of the weight, height, width, depth fields and enter a single value into there which will then pull through the shipping cost?
If an item which is a band 5 shipping, can the system use the cost of the band 5 shipping only instead of an accumulative cost?
Dependent on the value they enter the system should recognise the the highest shipping value item in the cart and apply that shipping charge automatically.
The current shipping system in catalyst is very poor, and for some small businesses that are not shipping large volumes to charge a flat rate will put customers off especially when you have items to the value of £1.99 and the flat rate is £3.95!
2. Is there a way of implementing a button which will allow the user to collect from store an deduct any shipping charges?
3. Product Attributes
The customer has 2 types of paint pots, a sample pot priced at 5.95 and a 1 litre pot at £18.95
At the moment we have two products setup with the same information, sample and main item and this will result in us having duplicated content which is no good for SEO.
Is there a way to setup a product which has two attributes and the first attribute is automatically selected (£18.95) and the user can then select a smaller size if they require.
Thanks for your help guys.
Kind Regards
Asad

This doesn't seem to address the fact that downloadable items should have no shipping cost. If you use total shopping cart value to determine shipping cost, this is what happens:
* You have a shipping fee of $5 for all orders between $0-50 and a shipping fee of $10 for all orders between $50.01-100
* You add $45 worth of socks and a $10 ePaper download to your cart
* BC charges you $10 for shipping, even though you're not shipping the ePaper
This is a very common scenario for our clients. We really need a "Shipping Never Applies" setting for products, just like we have a "Tax Never Applies" setting.

Raising Partial Production and purchase order from MRP.?

Hi Experts,
How to raise partial production order and purchase order from MRP..
Karthik

Karthi,
I believe you should go through both of these topics relating to Production Orders and MRP.
https://websmp105.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_FRAME=CONTAINER&_OBJECT=011000358700000321882005E&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000183&_ADDINC=
https://websmp105.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_FRAME=CONTAINER&_OBJECT=011000358700001061692007E&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000183&_ADDINC=
Best wishes
Suda

Approval Procedure for Issue to Production and Receipt from Production

Hi All,
Is there a way to create an approval procedure for Issue to production and Receipt from production?
Thanks.
Eric

Hi Riyaz,
Yes it is not in Standard SAP Business One. But is there a way to create one for issue to production and receipt from production?
Thanks.
Eric

Problem Posting Receipt From Production and Issue for Production

Hi Everyone,
I am posting Receipt from Production and Issue for Production through DIAPI in SAP Business One 2007A SP00 PL03.
I am using following lines of code
oDocument.Lines.SetCurrentLine(0);
oDocument.Lines.BaseEntry = int.Parse(BaseEntry);
oDocument.Lines.Quantity = double.Parse(Quantity);
lRetCode = oDocument.Add();
The Document adds perfectly but when I open the document in SAP Business One i am not able to see the Order Number at Line level on which this document was Based.
I identified the problem being Order Number Column being binded to BaseRef field hence form is not able to Show the Order Number and we cannot set BaseRef via DIAPI since the property to set that field is not exposed.
I donot want to update the table through a Recordset Update Query. I would appreciate if the property to set that field is exposed by SAP or any other workaround can be put forward by anyone who has faced the same problem.
Thanks
Kapil

Do you need to set
oDocument.Lines.BaseType = 17 (if this is sales order)
and then baseentry = baseentry....etc
If you bind the base entry correctly it should alwasy shows the base document on both database as well as front end. I have never had any problem with this
Sincerely

This is my first Apple product and probably the last - IOS 8.0.2 issues

I got a very bad taste of poor Apple software releases (IOS 8.0.2) in my Ipad, I expected the release to make things better but looks like I am in living **** with this update. Here is a short list of litany of issues
1) Safari crashes "a problem occurred with the webpage so it was reloaded" and crashes. I tried Google Chrome, it just crashes as well. Tried restart, clearing cache etc without any success
2) Multitasking gestures doesn't work, pinch to home screen works sporadically (very unreliable, I need to turn off and turn on this feature to make it work again)
I found so many issues in few minutes of use that I almost want to throw the ipad to the thrash. I didn't expect such a poor quality product and service from Apple.

If you use the Mail App and configure a Yahoo account you can then select up to 5 pictures from the Photo App and mail them as a single e-mail.

Processchain errors in Production and how to solve those issues

Dear All,
Please share some process chain errors in production and how to solve those errors as well,
Please send me if any one have the list of errors and how you are solved those..
I am very new to BW,am also preparing my list of errors and solutions to fix them..Please share me if any one have ?
Thanks

Hi
Table of Contents
1.     Time stamp error     2
2.      PSA error records     4
3.      SID not found for characteristic     7
4.      Error calling number range object     8
5.      Trfc error     10
6.      ALE REMOTE lock     13
7.      Delta fails     14
8.      Deleting setup table     18
9.      How to run statistical setup for different Application components     19
10. How to do selective deletion     22
11. Roll up     24
11. Compression or collapse     25
12. How to do Attribute change run     27
1.Time stamp error
Resolution procedure
Go to RSA1Source system
Run program RS_TRANSTRU_ACTIVATE_ALL
Mention source system and Info source and then execute.
Now the transfer structure will be automatically activated.
Then proceed with the reload, it will get success now.
2. PSA error records
Go to details tab, we will find its packet no. and its record no.
Resolution procedure
Click on PSA icon in monitor and select the error data packet
Double click on error record and edit it to the correct value,
select save.
Now update from PSA to target by selecting the option Start update immediately.
3. SID not found for characteristic
Resolution procedure
a. Remove the failed request from data target by making its QM status into red.
b. Load Master data for characteristic using full update.
c. Then reload the transactional data.
4. Error calling number range object
Resolution procedure
Note down the assigned dimension into the cube for 0VAL_TYPE
copy the dimension name
Go to RSRV transaction
Tests in Transaction RSRV -> All Elementary Tests ->Transactional Data then double click on Comparison of Number Range of a Dimension and Maximum DIMID- then click on the right pane in same->Mention the cube name and dimension name, click on enter.
Then click on correct error. It will correct the error.
5. Trfc error
Resolution procedure
Go to SM58
Go to edit->Execute LUW.
Then do refresh in monitor.
Now it will pick the records and the load will get success.
Some times we found that some packets will not get updated even if the extraction is showing as complete.
Do manual update of each packet
6. ALE REMOTE lock
Resolution procedure
This can happen when user or ALEREMOTE is accessing the same table
a.     Remove failed request from data target by making its QM status into red.
b.     Check into sm12 and delete the lock, usually the BASIS deletes them
c.     Reload the package
7. Delta fails
Resolution procedure
R/3->BW
Data is coming from R/3 then make the request technical status red in monitor and remove the request from manage.
go to info package restart the load, then you will get a pop up saying that repeat of last delta click on request again.
Go back to manage and look for the delta type, it will show as Repeat of last delta.
BW->BW(Data mart)
Delta load failed from ODS to cube/any data mart.
Make its technical status as red
Go to manage and remove the failed request by making its QM status as red.
It is updating from ODS, so we have to remove the data mart status in ODS manage, before restarting delta
If you click on data mart status it will pop up a window
Click on delete icon, select YES and then ok.
Now refresh manage the data mart status will get deleted.
If you load now the failed delta will get success.

Can PIR created at wbs element and MRP area of storage location level

Hi,
I tried to create an planned independent requirement at MRP area and WBS element level, but failed. The MRP area is not plant level, but storage location level.
*When trying to create account assignment category Q for it, then there is an error message saying:*
**only stock requirements are allowed when planning at MRP area level.**
Does it mean it is not possible to create planned independent requirement for this case?
Thanks!

Select the "Issue storage location" as '2' here:
spro -> production -> material requirement planning -> mrp groups -> overall maintenance of mrp groups -> overview -> mrp control parameters at material level -> (field) Issue storage location selection
& make sure:
1. In the BOM issue storage location is blank for the components
2. For the FG products , in mrp area prod.storage loc is maintained
3. Components are extended to the mrp area.
Pl. revert with the results

Delivery type "LB" and MRP

Hi All
I work on the APO side and iam not thorough with MM . I have a question about the subcontracting scenario .
We provide components to the subcontractor who then makes the finished products and ships them to our plant. Let us assume we have a subcontracting requirement for 100 CS. We now create a delivery (ME2o) to the subcontractor for 100 CS ( delivery type LB) . When we look at MD04 the delivery created for 100 CS is not offsetting the subcontracting requirement of 100 CS. So we now have a demand of 100 + 100 = 200 CS which is actually not the case. Is this a standard SAP behaviour ?
I believe whenever we issue goods to the vendor the stock at subcontractor location (MatSub) increases and the dependent demand gets offset by stock at subcontractor location . But why doesnt a delivery to the vendor offset the dependent demand ? Please help
Thanks
Saradha

Hi ,
I think planning strategy group plays a role in consuming the requirements along with MRP type (defined at material level)
check out MRP3 view -> Planning , Strategy group.
Thanks,
sudhakar

CO-Product, price difference issue

Dear Experts,
we are getting a probleum in CO-product, price difference do not split correctly.
Suppose there are three product A is the main product and B, C are Co-product, maintain equal valance number in material master MRP-2 view,
Planned qty in BOM is A-40, B-30,C-30
Actual GR QTY from PO. A-50,B-20,C-30
Price difference after settlement is 50,000/-, that fifty thousad should be distributed in actual quantity receive from from PO but system distributed on planned quantity, Material Ladger is active.
Please help to solve the issue
Thank you,

Hi Tanmay
Pls check if the settlement rule in production order is updated according to rules from material master.
Remember that first you have to update the rules in material master and after create the PO, so it gets the rules from material master.
I believe you can also change the rules for co-product in KOB5.
Regards

Sales forecasting scenario for production and procurement

Hello Gurus
We have currently one scenario need your inputs and expertise
We have a requirement for the Sales forecast for the production and procurement planning. More over its like demand planning but sales needs to have a 6 months or yearly sales forecast in the system.
Is there any option or functionality available for the same.in SAP-SD
Thanks inadvance
Regards
Venkat

Hi KV chalapathi
check this link
How to maintain Sales forecast or projection in SAP
hope clear your issue
Regards,
Krishna

T code for material production and production

Hi,
Could any one please tell me the *t-code* to find out monthly/ daily material wise production and consumption report in value and qty as well
Regards / Ashok verma

Dear Ashok Kumar,
Check the reports,
MCP3,MCPM - for the actual production happened for a period,you can get it daywise for any product.
MCRP,MCP6,MCRE - Actual consumption of materials during a period for production.
MB51 - you can get the list of 201 movement(In case if any material is issued against cost center).
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

My experience in Toshibas product and customer services

Just a warning to people who may be considering purchasing a Qosmio based on my own experiences and the research I have done in the last week.
Toshibas customer service is simply not what it once was and there are 100s of reports of Qosmios of all generations suffering extreme issues just outside of warranty periods.
Ref: Toshiba Qosmio X500-149, Support call reference ********
I am writing to express my frustration, anger and disappointment in Toshibas product and customer services.
I am a Freelance Community Manager, Video Game and hardware reviewer in the video games industry presently looking after 2 communities for 2 employers totalling over 2.5m users, I travel to a lot of trade shows, expos and community meet and greets where I require a laptop suitable of showing the employers products which are usually AAA video games or editing video on the fly for publication to social networking sites.
In January of 2011 my 4 year old Alienware hit that point where it really needed replaced, I opted for a Toshiba Qosmio over the Asus G73 as there was a 300 price difference for near identical spec.
I managed to source a X500-149 at PCWorld the companies flagship model here in the UK paying 1499 for it on January 26th 2011 reduced from 1799.
For the 1st 13 month this laptop performed admirably aside a design issue of the fan guards that I raised on the 16th May 2011 with PCWorld where the heat expelled causes the rear guard plastics to become exceptionally brittle and crack. I evangelised the product to anyone who asked me what laptop and model it was that was running these AAA games in such great detail, something I certainly won't be doing in future.
In early March 2012 it then began randomly locking up requiring a hard reboot this would then suffer issues restarting, reporting Operating system could not be found this would usually point to a fault on the primary HD, disk checking software however reported no errors but this continued to happen which would lead me to suspect the motherboard.
Within a month of this problem starting the left laptop fan began making a horrible screeching noise and had a distinct wobble whenever high RPM's were required and the machine began to often go into thermal shut-down whilst performing my work duties and utilising graphics and higher than idle CPU.
I decided on the 23rd April 2012 that enough was enough and I was going to speak to Toshiba as for this to happen to a flagship laptop that was only just out of warranty was simply unacceptable.
23rd April called to report the issue and was basically told tough luck its out of warranty at this point I also updated my tel numbers with Toshiba as the info was outdated, after expressing my anger at this Toshiba agreed to offer me a extended warranty at a cost of 166.
I was fuming to say the least Toshibas flagship laptop breaks at 14 month old and I am expected to stump up more money. If I was not desperate as the machine is critical to my work I would have returned the machine to PCWorld under the sales of goods act and it not being fit for purpose.
As that course of action would likely lead to legal proceedings, engineer reports and even more delay than just dealing with Toshiba for a repair, against my better judgement I called back at 11am on 24th April paid the 166 and took Toshiba up on the warranty extension, order number ********** again having to provide correct tel numbers as where once again incorrect, immediately after I reported the faults.
Toshiba Support centre on fault reporting where great noting each issue in detail and raised a collection with UPS for the following day.
The evening of the 24th April whilst I was retrieving data from the laptop in preparation for factory resetting it the machine went into thermal shut-down with a very distinct smell of burning chemical/plastic coming from the rear vents.
It took me over 90 minutes to get the machine cool enough to actually reboot and get my data after this I shut it back down and boxed it up not be used again.
I thought the best course of action would be to report this as it was a fair step up from the previous overheating. Wednesday 25th April at around 9am I called Toshiba to report this and was advised this would have to be dealt with by a head office case manager, as the item had become hazardous thus the collection that would take the laptop to the service centre was cancelled.
At this stage the advisor took my contact numbers again and escalated the case to head office advising at that time that I would be called by HO within 24 hrs.
Thursday 26th April 15:31 Well past the 24 hr mark and no sign of a call so I called support again and spoke to a advisor called Jacob. Jacob advise that HO had indeed tried calling on 01670 ******* this number was my old number, this number was the number I had advised twice already was incorrect and had provided both a correct land-line and mobile number 3 times previously. To say I was annoyed was a understatement.
Jacob attempted to contact Chloe Sontag who was looking after my case but the line just rang out so Jacob advised that he had sent an email asking for Chloe to contact myself.
Friday came and still no contact by 15:00 so I called support who once again tried to patch me to Chloe who's number once again just rang out and again an email was sent asking to call me.
No call by 17:30 so I called tech support again and spoke to Ian asking for head offices number so I could call them direct, Ian provided the number yet advised that HO are now closed.
After expressing my frustration with this whole process and just how critical this machine is to my daily working life Ian promised to look into the case on Monday AM and try and expedite actually getting a phone call to at least start the process of having this laptop repaired.
To say I'm annoyed is really a understatement not only has this failure to receive a simple phone call at least delayed the repair by almost a week but it is costing me more and money daily when I spent a large amount on what I imagined would be a great laptop for 3-4 years and believed Toshiba actually had good customer service in the event something did happen.
My best guess is that Chloe is on holiday or is part time or such like as her phone just rings out and if that is the case then I would question why assign a case to her, if she isn't then I would want to know why after 2 additional mails advising that the customer is not happy and to contact them has there been no contact or are your case workers just so overworked with faulty products that they can't manage the workload ??
So far Toshibas inability to produce a product that last as long as you expect it would has cost me 2 days off work that I am having to make up this weekend thus cancelling prior commitments, 166 extended warranty 600 for a HP laptop that I had to go and purchase yesterday 27th April 2012 to actually perform my work on and who knows how much in phone calls by the time this matter will finally be resolved.
I was happy with Toshiba as a manufacturer and of course laptops can have issues however having now researched these issues far to many Qosmio X500 users report severe overheating just after the 12 month period or within it and many state that repair after repair has taken place but still to no avail, this on top of the cracking of the rear heat-sink guards has to be a design fault.
This letter will not arrive with you before I have hopefully had a phone call and my laptop has at least been collected for repair, If I have not had that phone call then I would expect another letter very shortly.
Why have I wrote this letter ? To express my disappointment with just how poor the durability of your flagship laptop is and also at just how poor your customer service are, 1500 is a lot of money in the PC purchasing scheme of things and to expect this quality of hardware and customer service is simply unacceptable.
I expect the repair to be expedited and if like some of the horror storys I have read online parts required will take 4 weeks + then I would expect a replacement laptop, not everyone uses these things for entertainment and whilst the HP I had to rush out and buy with money I didn't really have available can allow me to perform my core duties to the minimum it cannot allow me to perform my duties to my standards, my employers standards or my expectant communities standards.
This has been a really unfortunate series of events as I had been considering the X870 Ivy Bridge based on the Nvidia 670m Qosmio which would release soon and passing this X500 onto my partner but after these events and the fact that the HP laptop had to come out of the money saved for it then I can categorically state that will not be the case and I will instead opt for the Asus G55 or G75.
If this issue cannot be resolved to a satisfactory manner then I will have no option but to seek an independent engineers report as well as printing the myriad of similar reports of these issues on the internet and return the item to PCWorld.
In line with the sale of goods act 1979 a large electrical item has to be of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose for a period of 6 years whilst I wouldn't expect the full 6 years from a laptop I would expect at least 3-4 year especially considering that this is a near 2000 flagship model not a 200 budget model.
This is a action I really do not want to take as it will likely end in small claims court against PCWorld a company that on this occasion has done nothing wrong, I do not believe in punishing those who are not at fault so its a action I really wouldn't be happy with and I'm sure PCWorld one of if not the largest vendor of Toshiba products when you incorporate the rest of the DSG group wouldn't be too pleased with it either.
Frustratingly

So I received my laptop back today after having fans replaced and a good clean as well as the top cover replaced.
Opened the box and took the laptop out 1st thing I noticed was a screw rattling around inside, SIGH!!!!
Plugged the laptop in and attempted to boot it at this point it just cycle through finalisation of windows install and shutdown.
How could a laptop have been tested if it didn't even have windows installed ?
An hour later and I gave up unplugged it and lo and behold it actually booted when on battery only.
I then noticed that the SSD was full, oh wait no it wasn't the head office engineer in his infinite wisdom decided that partitioning a 64GB SSD to 2 drives barely even leaving enough for Windows on the C: and wait for it putting the HDD recovery on the second partition was a good course of action.
So a completely borked install and a screw floating around inside remind me how this particular engineer has a job ??
I spent the next 15 minutes just moving data around and creating and deleting partiitions to fix this mess up.
Grabbed HWMonitor to check temps and at an idle 50c on CPU and 36c on GPU they didn't look too bad,
Installed the Toshiba recommended Nvidia driver a driver I hasten to add that was released in 2010 as Toshiba have not updated the drivers for their flagship series laptop since then, They are happy to take your 1643 that the unit cost but then don't expect support for it.
Anyway that aside I then installed 1 of the games I work on and began to run the machine through our benchmark software wooooosh the temps shot up to 90c+ on both CPU and GPU and remained at this temp for the duration of the benchmark never quite triggering thermal shutdown, I then loaded into a warzone for further testing and sure enough half way through it the machine shut down due to thermal shutdown.
I then uninstalled the toshiba driver and tried a NVidia one sure enough as others have advised actual Nvidia drivers seem worse and thermal shutdown came so much earlier.
I have been to PCWorld today to begin proceedings of returning outside of warranty due to not being fit for purpose or of suitable quality. This is costing me a further 60 and at least 2 weeks more without a proper machine and will likely result in me getting about 1300 back from PCWorld.
So lets do the math on just what this will have cost me by the time its finished.
1634 Original purchase
166 Extended Warranty
600 Backup Laptop whilst this was away for a month
60 outside of warranty assessment
50 phone calls
I will probably receive 1300 back but then 1300 doenst buy me the spec I need for work so I will have to pull out another 300-400 for the required spec so lets add that to the original figures.
A Toshiba Qosmio, Toshibas flagship laptop will have cost me in total 2910 almost double its actual retail price.
I will NEVER buy a Toshiba product again and it will become my lifes mission to let everyone know just how terrible they are.

Production and MRP issues

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for