Production Order with Standard Costing

Hai
How to activate check point
If standard cost (Price control -"S") is less then 0 in material master then production Order can not creae.
Dharmesh Soni

Hi Soni
As AMIT said this can only be solved only by User exit.
This user exit will pop up error message during plan order to prod order conversion while saving or during saving prod order when it is manually created.
This user exit will look whether the standard cost estimate has been run for the header material of prod order and will not allow you to save the prod order.
Regards
J . Saravan

Similar Messages

Re:No release of production order without standard cost estimate

Hello Experts
I do not want to release any production order without standard cost estimate
I have come acroos the same problem raised by some other users and can you please suggest how to achieve this?
Is there any way to achieve this without user exit?
Thanks and Regards
Subbu

Hello Subbu,
In this case, you need to put the status as "B4" Blocked in costing 1 view of material master, when you create the costing view and change it to "03" status when you released the cost estimate.
Please note that this field can be overwritten in MRP view also. Hence please get the good control of material master and good coordination with PP team to achive this.
Please let me know if you require any clarifications.
Thank you,
Regards,
Santosh
Please reward points if helpful.

No release of production order without standard cost estimate

Hi All,
I have an requirement, that is production order for a material should not be released or saved if standard cost estimate for that period is not released. Basically it should not allow to release or save the production for that material, is SCE is not run for that period. I tried various options, i also overheard its possible through user exit and many people have succeed in that.
Has anybody overcome this problem, please do let me know. And which user exit??
Thanks in advance
With Best Regards
GJ.

Hi...
I have faced the same problem in my previous project. What i have instructed to my client is to take control of Master data and put the status as "03" Blocked for movement till the statndard cost is released for this material.
You can relase the status to "E2" in Cross Plant Status Field in Costing one view once the cost estimate is released for the material.
I hope this works for you.
Please let me know if you require any fruther information.
Thank you,
Regards,
Santosh
Rewards points if helpful.

Blocking creation of production order if standard cost estimate is not done

Hi PP gurus,
Can anyone help me in blocking the creation of production order if the standard cost estimate is not done for the particular posting period.

Hi,
I do not think there exist a standart check. You can use exit EXIT_SAPLCOZF_003 to block creation of production order by sending error messages based on any condition.
Regards.

Report for production order with actual and target cost for each

Hi
Is there any report that gives me the list of all production orders in a month with its respective actual and target costs?
I can use COOIS to get a list of production orders, then double click on the prod order, then click on goto and then to cost analyis.. but can i avoid going through all this and get a report with the details i need?
thanks in advance

Thanks a lot for that.
I'm a little confused with the columns in the report.
Which columns should I keep for my requirement? -
Production Order
Total Target Cost
Total Actual Cost
Total Actual Qty
Total Target Qty
Thanks

Report for Production orders with name of Customers

Dear Expert,
Kindly suggest to view the production orders with customer numbers for which the sales orders is created.
I tried in MB51 with layout settings but the customer number comes out be blank despite the sales order number is populated for an production order.
Kindly suggst a way or any report in the system to get the corresponding information of production order number and corresponding customer name mentioned in the sales order .
Thanks in advance for your help and inputs..
Best regards,
Nitish jain

Nitish,
MB51 is a Material Document list. Many production orders exist that have no entries in this report, so it would be an unlikely candidate to be a solution for your requirement..
The standard production order reporting tool is COOIS. The output for MTO orders can be configured to display Sales order and Item and Soldto.
Obviously, displaying even the customer order number in COOIS is impossible in a MTS scenario.
In addition, a user experienced in using SAP Query (SQVI or SQ01/SQ02/SQ03) could also create a production order report without having to know ABAP, by properly linking tables AFKO, AUFK, AFPO (production order data) with VBAK (sales order header data) to get customer number, and KNA1 to get customer name..
If you are not expert in SAP Query, I suggest you discuss this requirement with a local ABAPer.
If you are feeling like educating yourself in the wonders of SAP query, try this doc. Although old, SAP query hasn't changed very much since this document was written.
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCSRVQUE/BCSRVQUE.pdf
Rgds,
DB49
Edited by: Dogboy49 on Apr 20, 2010 10:47 PM

Error message while creating production order with KMAT material strategy25

Hi PP Gurus I am running variant configuration cycle...Strategy 25, Custermer Req KEK (KMAT Matrl)
Sales order & MRP Picked the components correctly as per the dependencies
written. So Planned order generated against sale order.
When I tried to convert planned order to Production order...I am getting the
below error message..
Error Message:
You cannot make an assignment to make-to-order stock Message no. CO684
Diagnosis The component cannot be allocated to an individual stock because
make-to-order production and engineer-to-order production cannot be executed
with this order.
A possible cause is that you are trying to create an order with reference to a
sales-order/project, where an account assignment to a sales order/project is not
allowed in the settlement profile that is assigned to the chosen order type.
This is inconsistant.
System response The following responses are possible:
Order processing is cancelled.
The system resets the special stock indicator back to the original value.
Procedure Choose another order type.
I used order type with SD1 as settelement profile.
OVZG: default 046, settlement profile = SD1
OPJH: Settlement profile = SD1
Plz through some light on this if u have worked on Variant Configuration/MTO
settlements.
Question:
1) Is creation of production order with KMAT material supported by SAP?
2) If yes, why the above error occurs?
Waiting for Ur reply
With Best Regards

Dear R.Brahmankar,
I have check on the note, but it is not relevant to ecc6. The current system default setting is :
Standrad setting for reqt class 046
Special Stock E
Acct Assgt Cat. M
Valuation M
Settlmt Profile SD1
However if I change the Acct Assgt Cat. from M to E. It resolve the problem. I would like to know is this the right solution?
Config in Acct Assgt M
Consumption Posting = E
Config in Acct Assgt E
Consumption Posting = ' '
In F1 key of Consumption Posting field it shown following:
To flag the sales order item as cost- and revenue-carrying, enter an "E" (settlement via sales order).
If you do not wish to flag the sales order item as cost- and revenue-carrying, do not enter anything.
Dependencies
If you are working with nonvaluated sales order stock, always flag the sales order item as cost- and revenue-carrying.
If you are working with valuated sales order stock:
In the case of complex make-to-order production, flag the sales order item as cost- and revenue-carrying
In the case of sales-order-related mass production, do not flag the sales order item as cost- and revenue-carrying
Should we change to E?
Regards,
Ong

EXTERNAL OPERATION in a production order with different company code plant

Hi,
in my case i am having a production order with 4 operations.
0010 milling
0020 winding
0030 cutting
0040 milling
among this opearion 0030 i want to do it in a plant which is assigned to different company code than mine.
in this case whether i should proceed with PP01 Control key with opearion plant as that plant which is lieing in diffent company code or
i should specify PP02 control key saying that plant as an external vendor for me and do PR and PO for that service .
which should i follow for my case and how cost gets updated .

Hi,
For different company code, u have to specify PP02 in the routing for external vendor. In PP02 control key indicator must be set in external opn.
Before that create purchase info record.
Enter subcontract info record in routing.
after running MRP , convert the PR to PO.
Send the material by MB1B by 541 mvt
Receive the material by MIGO by 101 mvt.
Regards,
Raja sd

Report to view Production order wise atcual cost when PO is assigned to PCC

Hi All,
Can anyone help me to get the report for production order wise actual cost incurred when that Production order is assigned to PCC (Product cost collector).
Is it possible through Summarization hierarchy or Product drilldown?
If yes, can u explain the steps.
Regards,
Durga.

Hi Bhaskar
You are in Alaska and you wanna eat vegetarian food
You cant get values at Prod order level if you have chosen PCC as cost object.... You will only get Qty at Prod order level
To get a bird's eye view of costs incurred in PCC, execute report MCRY with PCC as the input... MCRX shows only Qty info for components
br, Ajay M

Production order with reference to sales order

Hi experts,
I have created one sales order.
I am getting an error as "sales order has no CO object" while creating production order with reference to that sales order. Can anyone help me on this ?
Thanks in advance.
Rgds,
Parul.

Dear singh,
pls check this given by yadav
T. Code: OKKP - Maintaining Controlloing Area
Select your Controlling Area and Click: Activate components/control indicators (left-hand Dialog Structure)
Here, Under Tab: Activate, check Boxes: Sales Order, Cost Objects, etc..
Check whether Strategy Group is maintained in Material Master (MM02) --> View: MRP3.
T. Code: VA02/ VA03 --> Tab: Procurement -> Column: RqTy
There, Check whether requirement type is relevant for MTO.
More information:
Req. type: KE (if, Reqmts class: 040 Mke-to-ord.w/o cons. - possible to create Production order)
Req. type: KEK (If, Reqmts class: 020)
Req. type: KSV (used for Make to stock - Planning with Assembly Planning Strategy 40 is being used in the MRP3 view of the material)
Also, Check other relevant settings in:
SPRO --> IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Functions --> Availability Check and Transfer of Requirements --> Transfer of Requirements
Best Regards,
vraj

Blocking of production order with respect to particular customer

Hai Gurus,
Is there is any provision to stop processing of production order with reference to particular customer.
Regards,
sekar chand

Hi,
This is not possible directly in standard SAP. You need to use user exit in production order to sgtop creating production order for perticular customer.
During production order SAVE user exit or BADI, You can call up for sales order resposnsible for PO and check for SOLD to party in sales order and throw error message if it is not intended customer.
Check and revert,
Regards,
Santosh Sarda

Transacciu00F3n MFN1 - Error KA465: Production order with an actual activity up

Hi Exerts,
I am executing transaction MFN1 with "Update of Activity Consumption in the Quantity Structure" = 2 and the following error ocurrs: "KA465 Production order with an actual activity update.".
I changed the customizing "Update of Activity Consumption in the Quantity Structure" to "Activity update not relevant to price determination", after this I exectuted transaction MFN1 again and the error didn't occur.
I need to understand what is the impact of changing this customizing, and if I set the "Update of Activity Consumption..." equal 2, the activity actual values are revaluated in the CKM3N? If the answer is yes, in what point of the CKMLCP this value is revaluated?.
Regards

Hi,
please check CKM9 for the relevant plant how you define the Activity update. Please note KA465 is justified to avoid posting the credits and debits twice if the indicator is '2'.
If you are using activity update '2', the differences between planned and actual activity prices are not distributed to the orders but via multilevel price determination directly to the materials.
The system determines the actual prices by means of the multi-level price determination in the actual calculation.
In the actual calculation, the system also already debits the materials and credits the cost centers or vice versa.
In this case, the revaluation must not be executed because otherwise the system posts the debits and credits twice. In this case, the system ought to display error message KA465.
Note 686588 explains under what circumstances error KA465 may be raised, that is, if you have activated Material Ledger/Actual Costing with Activity Consumption '2'. Please check your Material Ledger settings in relation to note 686588.
If you use activity update '1' then revaluation is done via the orders and no longer via Material Ledger.
regards
Waman

Closing the Production Order with status PCNF

Hi Experts,
May I kindly ask if I can close an order with status Partially confirmed? If not, how can I cancel the confirmation if I had already reversed the goods movement in the confirmation thereby flagging an error of a deficit in the material quantity during cancellation of the confirmation?
I really need your help since I need to close the production orders with this case.
Hoping so much for your replies.
Many thanks in advance.
Sincerely,
Ria

Ria,
I am not so clear about the exact situation.
When you say you have reversed the goods movement with MIGO, is it reversal of the documents posted with confirmation or the individual documents?
You can only cancle the document with MIGO which are independent of the confirmation.
The documents which are with the confirmation can not be reversed in any case with MIGO.
I suggets you go this way,
1. Check why system is giving you error as 'Deficit......'. The one thing I suspect that you must have performed auto GR & moved out the stock of FG from that location.
If it's so then bring back the stock to it's original location & cancel the confirmation.
While cancelling the confirmation where you might have executed goods issue with backflush this error won't arise as the stock will be bring back to storage location form the order.
Don't reverse the cancellation of the of the documents youhave performed with MIGO for independent material posting on the order. Keep it as it is.
This way the cancellation of confirmation & material movement will be done & now cost on the order will be zero.
You can assign the status CLSD as well as DLFL to the order.
2. In case you find the above activities can not be carried out for some reason then give status TECO to the order.
Sttle the order so that the cost on the order will be zero, then give status CLSD.
As far as possible stick to solution no. 1 only.
Go for solution no. 2 when you don't have any other option.
Hope this helps you.
SmanS

Settlement rule auto created in Production Order with Receiver Type as OIT

Hi,
I am creating a production order with material number in CO01. The system is automatically putting OIT in receiver category, in settlement rule.
And its populating the child materials there. I expect the parent material to be populated in the settlement receiver.
In the settlement profile maintained in order type, I have maitained MAT.
Please let me know, why system is autopopulating the role like above.
Regards
SR

Hi,
If you are going to settle the production order to Material, there is no need to enter Allocation structure in Settlement profile unless its used for variance settlement...
Allocation structure has an option to settle to OIT with a settlement cost element or primary cost element...which is why i wanted you to check for that.
Anyways, Follow the thread, this should help you
Change the Settlement Rule
Thx
PG

GR for production order post to cost center and not to the production order

Hi all,
when we post the goods receipt for the finished product against the production order (mov. type 101), the order is not credited with the corresponding stock value. Instead of this, the value accounts to a cost center.
We specified this cost center in OKB9 (Default account assignment), because if not, we get an error when posting the goods receipt cause of lacking accounting object.
I can't see why the system does not credit the production order?
Any ideas?
Thanks for your time
Daniel

Hi Daniel,
This is the first time i am coming across an issue like this.
neverthless from a logical front,
1. Remove Cost center as a valid receiver in Settlement Profile.
2. Your OKB9 setting are pretty much good. No need to worry about it. Becasue, OKB9 only will work if the system doesn't identify any other cost object. In this case Production Order is an automatic cost object which system should have taken.
3. Check the Settlement rule when you have created Production Order. It should have been MAT.
4. I hope you are creating Production Order with Material (using CO01 and not CO07)
5. Make sure in OPL8, the default rule in controlling tab is PP1.
Once all these are fine, i do not see any reason why you will get your probelm.
Please check and revert back to me if the problem still persists.
Best Regards
Surya

Production Order with Standard Costing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for