Production Planning at Moving Average Price

We do very little manufacting, in fact, I would call it "re-packaging".  All our compnay does is take products from one package size and convert them to another package size, for example, we take bulk gallons and repackage it to 5 gallon pails.  The only materials involved is a 5 gallon pail and the 5 gallons of material that go into that pail.  We want the finished products moving average price (MAP) to be equal to the MAP of the inputs.  I know that finished products should not be carried at MAP, but we manufacture on such a small scale that I don't think we will have huge issues carrying finished goods at MAP.  We are not interested in knowing what the product cost vs. what the product should have cost to produce, all we want to happen is have the finished product=cost of inputs.
  Is there anyone that has done this?  If so, what is the best way to configure our system.
Thanks in advance,
Scott

The basic issue with moving average price for manufactured items is getting all the costs on the production/process orders before the finished items is consumed out of stock.  For example, make 10 items with costs of $100, so moving average price is $10 each.  9 of the finished items are then consumed leaving 1 in stock.  An additional cost is incurred on the production/process order of $50 (i.e. missed goods issue, COGI error, etc.) the single item in stock will now have a moving average price of $60 ($10 + $50).  If the finished item is fully consumed then the $50 goes to a production variance account.
With standard price you consume for the same price (subject to periodic recalcalution) and analyis your production variances.

Similar Messages

  • Product Costing using Moving Average Price of FERT & HALB

    Dear Experts,
    My client wants to use Product Costing functionality by using Moving Average Price instead of Standard Price on Finished Goods & Semi Finished Goods and as per my understanding, SAP recommends to use Standard Price on FERT &  HALB.
    I know if we use moving average price instead of standard price than there will be no concept of variances. Can anyone tell me more about what are the pros and cons of using moving average price instead of standard price in Product Costing?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Zain Bashir

    Hi Zain
    Let's take an example
    You have V for Mat A
    You create 3 Prod orders in a month
    Order 1 - Qty 10 - variance 100
    Same for Order 2 and 3..
    At month end, you sold 20 pieces and 10 is in stock..
    When you settle order 1, system will compare order qty and stock.. It will match I.e. 10 = 10... Hence variance of 100 will be posted on stock
    Same will happen for Order 2 and 3... Ideally, only 100 should have posted on stock... but in this case 300 of variance will be posted on stock...
    This is what the note mentioned by Arturo tells, but not so clearly
    Hope this helps
    Br. Ajay M

  • Product Cost under Moving Average Price

    Hi Sapians,
    Please guide me how to configure Product Costing & the users steps to test the same. Here client wants to work in Moving Average Price.
    Regards,
    Vikas

    Hello Viki,
    This question can not be answered in this forum simply because its not issue based and we can't help you with each step. Yes product costing can be done using moving average price and you can do so in the Valuation and Account Assignment section in materials management. However, moving average is not a recommended approach for internally manufactured goods and it may result in allocation of the previous period's variance on the valuation of the products in the next period. You can find more on this on SAP Library and you can download the SAP's best practices configuration guides from the SAP website for help on configuring.
    Kind Regards // Shaubhik

  • Product Costing with Moving Average Price

    Dear Experts,
    Please guide me solution of my below scenario :
    - FG Material (500013) Process Order Created of 1000 units at 1st August.
    - FG Material (500013) Process Order confirmed and GR posted at 3rd of August.
    - All stock of FG Material  (500013) sold at 25th of August <Stock Out>.
    - Now at month end, when we execute actual activity price calculation, what would be the impact of revaluation of actual activity price where no material existed in stock ?
    Please guide?
    Regards.
    Zain Bashir

    Hi
    Probably I am not getting your question exactly. Based on my understanding of query I would like to state as under. If I missed your concern, kindly revert.
    Based on actual activity prices when you will revalue process order the activity cost on that order will come on actual prices and when you will calculate variance and settle it, the same will be settled to production variance account. Please check and verify in test system.
    Regards
    Rajneesh

  • Difference between Standard Pricing and Moving Average Price

    Hi,
    Would like to seek some advises on the difference between standard price and Moving average price.
    also, how does it affect the account postings differently?
    Thanks

    Standard Price
    Materials whose price control indicator is set to S are valuated in Financial Accounting (FI) at standard price.
    This is recommended for semifinished products and finished products.
    The moving average price is shown as a statistical value in the material master record.
    The standard price is normally calculated using a standard cost estimate for the material. The standard price can also be calculated in a mixed cost estimate.
    Moving Average Price
    When materials whose price control indicator is set to V are received from in-house manufacturing processes, they are initially valuated with a value you defined (such as the standard price). When you settle, the material stock account is debited with the variances. This results in a new moving average price.
    Valuating semifinished products and finished products with the moving average price is not recommended.
    Regards,
    Indranil

  • Moving average price in case of semifinished product.

    Dear All,
    Our client wants to go for moving average price in case of semifinished material, which is supposed to be normally standard price against our advice. The problem is that MAP is not getting updated after the GR against the production order. What settings I need to check in cusomization from PP point of view to solve this problem. Ideally the summation of cost of raw materials has to be the cost of semifinished material.
    I did the settlement and the MAP got updated. There are few questions I want to ask u are?
    1. What MAP should I keep when I create the semifinished material for the first time?
    2. What the base to calculate the target cost in production order? Currently the target cost is zero for that the varience is huge which will be going to affect the MAP in a big manner after setllement? What should I do in that case?
    Ur valuable inputs are awaited at the earliest. It's very very urgent.

    Hi
    There will not any big problem if your client insists upon MAP for the material instead of your suggestio for having S as per std. SAP suggestions. There will not be any change in material price during confirmation if you have V indicator but if you have S as indicator there will be change in price due to costing and settlement. It is not that system will not do anything for the materials having V indicator, check the field value for Standard price , it gets updated. Your costing calculation completely depends uopn the settings that has been customised in OPN2 i.e the settings available for valuation. You cancompletely control all these.
    Pirce for your semifinished  should include the inputs to it and any other parameters which you would like to add. You can always change the price manually with MR21 if you have Zero stock.
    Best Regards

  • Moving average price for semi finished products

    Hi
    Could anyone light on this issue,
    Our client maintain moving average price for the semi finished material, need clarification on below points
    1)  What is the advantages and disadvantages due moving average price,
    2) Which price in the material master after the production order settlement,
    3) Is there any impact of this on WIP calcaultions
    Thanks in advance
    Mohan M

    Hi
    there are no advantages of it, ONLY Dis Advantages!!!
    That will ruin your inventory valuation forever.. Consider the eg below if your price control is V
    1. Your moving price in mat master is 100 USD
    2. You Mfr on Jan 1 @ Actual cost = 110 in Prod order and Qty = 1.
    Upon GR, GR will happen @ 100 and at period end if Qty is lying in stock, 10 variance will also be inventorized
    BUT, now consider this
    1. 1. Your moving price in mat master is 100 USD
    2. You Mfr on Jan 1 @ Actual cost = 110 in Prod order and Qty = 1.
    Upon GR, GR will happen @ 100 and variance lying is 10 in prod order
    3. You Mfr on Jan 10 @ Actual cost = 110 in Prod order and Qty = 1.
    Upon GR, GR will happen @ 100 and variance lying is 10 in prod order
    4. On jan 15, you consume Qty 1 and qty lying in stock is 1
    5. In period end, when you do settlement, following will happen
    a. For prod order 1: Qty Mfd 1 and Qty lying in stock 1 - Result: variance 10 will be inventorized.
    Mvg Avg price will shoot upto 110
    b. For prod order 2: Qty Mfd 1 and Qty lying in stock 1 - Result: variance 10 will be inventorized.
    Mvg Avg price (MAP) will shoot upto 120
    System wont check whether the qty lying in stock pertains to prod order 1 or 2... It will simply check if the Qty of prod order matches with qty lying in stock. hence, it will keep on inventorizing variance in this case.... and your MAP will touch the sky
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Moving average price of subcontracted material not picked for Cost estimation

    Hi Experts
    I have the below scenario:
    Finshed Product A has components B, C.
    C is a subcontacted material and it has its own BOM with components D & E.
    We are maintaining moving average price for the subcontracted material C, (because the subcontracter is adding X & Y in addtion to the components D and E, which are sent from us).
    In the mateial maste of C, Procurement type is F and Spl. procurement type 30 are maintained.
    When i do costing for the Finished product A, moving average price of C is not picked up (where as system calculates the std cost for C by adding the values of D & E and purchase info record price).
    Is there any way to Calculate Price of A by using the mvg avg price of C.
    I maintained the below valuation variant settings.
    If i remove the spl. procurement type 30 in the material master of C, it picks up the mvg. avg price. but it affects the MRP planning of  items D & E.
    Please advice.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Bala

    Hi Big choi
    Thanks for your response.
    I understand.
    1. if we maintain spl. procureent key 30, system calculates standard cost based on raw material and service charges.
    2. If we don't maintain spl. proc key, it considers the material as purchased and picks the mvg avg price from material.
    But, is there any way to pick the moving avg price from material master eventhough i maintained the spl. procurement type 30?
    Thanks
    Bala

  • Finished goods and Semifinished goods at moving average price

    Hi,
    Till time, we were running our business process for product costing based on Standard price for FG and SFG. We were taking Raw material and packing material with mvg avg price. Now for one of our new company we are planning to initiate cost of FG, SFG based on moving avg. price as per business requirement.
    Can you please guide me which are the settings in product costing I need to take care for running my price for FG and SFG based on moving average price?
    Thanks,
    Taral Patel

    Hi,
    There won't be any difference settings for Price control V
    Only accounting entry will change.
    If you maintain Standard price then the Prod. variance a/c entry is
    Production variance a/c Dr/Cr
    COGM a/c Cr/Dr
    If you maintain Moving AVG price then the Prod. variance a/c entry is
    Stock Dr/Cr
    COGM Cr/Dr
    Rgds
    Murali. N

  • Finished Goods at  Moving average Price.

    Hi Experts,
    In my company FG maintained at Moving average price, during the Go-live they fed the value manually in material master of FG.
    Now at the time of production conformation system considering BOM for consumption, but for cost of production system just taking the value fed in FG material master.
    Please explain what is the impact if i maintain my FG at moving average, whether we can change that to standard price.
    Please explain me briefly.
    Regards
    Sreenivas.P

    Hi,
    Ideally Raw Material, packing material should be maintained on Mvg Avg Price for your CO-PC (product Costing). Finished Goods / Semifinished goods should be maintained on Standard price only.
    Actually once you maintain the same on Std price, So after your costing run the system will pick Std. price of that FG / SFG based following :
    1. price of RM / PM from material components defined in BOM
    2.Activity prices defined in KP26
    3. Based on routing / master recipe, system will calculate activity defined for your resource / work center
    4. Overheads from costing sheet
    So, in Std. price of your FG / SFG, system will give all these details. While you go for your process Order / Production order, system will book actual cost of FG / SFG on production order. So, at month end when you run variance cycle, system will also give you variance between plan and actual.
    Hope it will help a lot.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Taral Patel

  • Moving Average Price and Total Stock not updated for MTO scenario

    We are using MTO with planning strategy 20, individual collective indicator is 1 (individual requirement only) and price control is V for finished goods. We are facing the following problems after we perform GR of above FG from MFBF (Repetitive -run schedule header):
    1)Total Stock field (LBKUM)in Accounting View 1 remain as blank but the sales order stock is appear in Stock Overview screen.
    2)Moving average price does not updated after periodic settlement is carried out.
    It seem that problem can only be resolved if we change the planing strategy to MTS (ex:40), appreciate that if any of you can provide the solution.
    p/s: on ECC5 system.

    Hi,
    Good morning and greetings,
    The standard SAP says as below
    The Raw Materials should have MAP 'V' and the SFG and FG should have the price control as 'S' basically because the standard costing variant PPC1 uses the sequence of Standard Price as the first update at the time of price update and settlement.
    I presume MFBF is used for Repetitive Manufacturing and not for MTO scenario...Repetitive Manfuacturing is MTS scenario...Goods receipt of production order is normally done through MB31.
    If you still want to use the MAP for FG and SFG then you will have to change the costing variant appropriately to pick the MAP first at the time of goods receipt and settlement.
    Please reward points if found useful.
    Thanking you
    With kindest regards
    Ramesh Padmanabhan

  • MTS variances with moving average price

    Hi expert,
    Is it possible to satisfy this requirement for cost estimate and variances in make to stock scenario ?
    -Actual cost at Moving average price for all article
    -Calculate cost estimate for articles and write it on standard price field with strategy that read also standard price
    -Calculate planning and production variances for all the Make to Stock PP order?but stock must be update with Moving average price.
    My doubt is how can i have variances detailed if i manage article with Moving average price.
    How can I have variances as "statistics" otherwise I would have double costs.
    thanks

    HI
    If you manufacture some thing, its price control should never be V, else it ruins the inventory valuation forever
    Consider the eg below if your price control is V
    1. Your moving price in mat master is 100 USD
    2. You Mfr on Jan 1 @ Actual cost = 110 in Prod order and Qty = 1.
    Upon GR, GR will happen @ 100 and at period end if Qty is lying in stock, 10 variance will also be inventorized
    BUT, now consider this
    1. Your moving price in mat master is 100 USD
    2. You Mfr on Jan 1 @ Actual cost = 110 in Prod order and Qty = 1.
    Upon GR, GR will happen @ 100 and variance lying is 10 in prod order
    3. You Mfr on Jan 10 @ Actual cost = 110 in Prod order and Qty = 1.
    Upon GR, GR will happen @ 100 and variance lying is 10 in prod order
    4. On jan 15, you consume Qty 1 and qty lying in stock is 1
    5. In period end, when you do settlement, following will happen
    a. For prod order 1: Qty Mfd 1 and Qty lying in stock 1 - Result: variance 10 will be inventorized.
    Mvg Avg price will shoot upto 110
    b. For prod order 2: Qty Mfd 1 and Qty lying in stock 1 - Result: variance 10 will be inventorized.
    Mvg Avg price (MAP) will shoot upto 120
    System wont check whether the qty lying in stock pertains to prod order 1 or 2... It will simply check if the Qty of prod order matches with qty lying in stock. hence, it will keep on inventorizing variance in this case.... and your MAP will touch the sky
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Materials Valued at Moving Average Price

    Hi,
    What is the role of product cost planning in case of materials valued at moving average price.

    Hi,
    When you don't use materials for production planning you can use in MM the moving average price.
    When you are using PP it is better to use standard prices, you make a planning in product costing and from there you update the price in MM. For the sales materials it is a total price from different components used in your PP order and perhaps some stistical components
    Later with sales you upload CO-PA with the sales price and can upload the information from PC. In PC you can have a version by month / year.
    When you use material ledger you can upload the price differences to CO-PA.
    Now you can report from Material ledger and CO-PA the differences between standard pricing and the real costs in combination with sales
    Paul

  • Moving Average Price - RM

    Hi,
    For the client, to perform actual costing we have enabled
    ML.
    Price Control :RM - V & SFG/FG - S,
    We have completed the product cost planning, performed GRR .
    For the mentioned above scenerio, request to answer the
    following queries:
    a) How to avoid the updation of standard price for RM?,
    b) While performing GRR,
    Ex : Last Moving average price : 0.55 Paise / KG,
    PO price : 0.90 paise / kg,
    system passes the following FI entries:
    110001     Inventory -RM     6.600,00
    210002     GRIR     10.800,00-
    410061     Price Diff-RM-PRD     4.200,00
    - can any one explain the same how to rectify the same to get  the complete amount in Inventory than in price difference?
    Rgds
    SMK

    Hi,
    Your scenario is like this:
    RM Price Control  - 'V'
    Price Determination  - '2' (Transaction Based Settlement).
    SFG / FG  - Price Control - 'S'
    Price Determination - '3' (Periodic Price Unit).
    for items with price control 'V' and Price Detrmination '2'  the system would create 2 accounitng documents together with the GR.
    1.  The first accounitng document is what you have written.
    2.  The second accounting doucment will settle the price difference posted in the first document to the mateiral.  Thereby ensureing that material is valued with moving average price.
    The price determination is '2' which means Transaction based settlement so the system identifies the difference, posts it and also settle it to the material simeltenaously.
    You can confirm that the valuatioin is correct by checking transaction CKM3.
    Hope this helps you.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Varadharajan

  • REM wip and moving average price

    Hi,
    I am working in REM scenario. my fert item is having moving average price say Rs 2.Currently zero stock of finished item. I am having a planned orderA quantity 10  from Oct 1st to nov 30th. when i do backflush at nov 30 , i do assembly backflush and post auto GR of 10 quantity. after doing settlement, i got my moving average price as Rs12.
    I have another planned order B for quantity 20, same finished item from oct 15th to dec15th. On nov 30th when i am doing component backflush or activity backflush of second planned order( i am not doing assembly backflush on nov 30 because this order is not yet completed, it will complete on 15th December), system is posting all cost on my existing stock of finished item and increasing the moving average price of finished item from Rs 12 to Rs 17.
    But this is wrong because cost should not exceed for existing stock, cost should be posted for WIP..
    Please tell me how to correct this?
    how to calculate WIP in REM? is it mandatory to go for reporting backflush? i have only one operation in my rate routing i.e labor hours is my only operation  in 0010.
    Regards.

    Hi,
    Thanks for ur help.
    But my doubt is something different!
    If i have a planned order' A'( qty 10)which is completed in Novemeber month and another planned order 'B' ( qty 20) which is still in WIP on November end, and at this stage if I do backflush for planned order A, cost flows properly and finished item is put in stock with some moving average price.But when i book labor hours again for planned order B, it books cost. But this time i do not do assembly backflush because production is not yet finsihed.so stock quantity is still the old one i.e 10 qty.So second cost booking goes to the stock item of 10 qty and increases the moving average price. system dfoesnt understand that second labor hours is booked for second planned order . this is happening because both planned orders are of same finished item.
    please reply.
    please tell me what is the way to do reporting backflush. what settign we need to do? can it solve my issue?? because my target is to book cost in case of second planned order as WIP and do NOT effect the moving average price of existing stock.
    Regards.

Maybe you are looking for