Project Folder Structure.

Ok, this is a question that possible has more then one correct answer however I would like to know your opinions about this one. On the internet (google, ant documents, maiven, etc) they have different standards on how the folder structure for the project must be. However I have my own ideas on the folder structure for the project itself. I usually divide it as follows.
app
   +-- src
   +--config
   +-- lib
test
   +-- src
   +--config
   +-- lib
bin
docHowever I do understand that the above may not the best soltution. Does anyone have like a prefered way of how create the folder structure?

Ok, this is a question that possible has more then
one correct answer however I would like to know your
opinions about this one. On the internet (google,
ant documents, maiven, etc) they have different
standards on how the folder structure for the project
must be. However I have my own ideas on the folder
structure for the project itself. I usually divide
it as follows.
app
+-- src
+--config
+-- lib
test
+-- src
+--config
+-- lib
bin
docHowever I do understand that the above may not
the best soltution. Does anyone have like a prefered
way of how create the folder structure?I usually have something like this (I very seldom have web applications, but the structure of those might look a bit different)
app
   +-- module1
         +-- src
         +-- classes
         +-- javadoc
         +-- test
               +-- src
   +-- module2
         +-- src
         +-- classes
         +-- javadoc
         +-- test
               +-- src
   +-- config
   +-- libKaj

Similar Messages

  • Web assistant dump-file pre-seeded project folder structure

    We are using headstart which includes the headstart templates and libraries plus some customized libraries etc. as well.
    We haven't installed the web assistant yet I but have read that it has a dump-file that contains a pre-seeded project folder structure.
    Can someone give more details about this project folder structure? Does this structure support only the CDM and PJM deliverables?
    Thanks,
    [email protected]

    Bump.

  • Exporting project- folder structure to other Non-Aperture  applications

    Hello,
    I'm about to lay the foundation for a new Aperture installation. As far as organizational structure goes, this what I have in mind:
    1 Project / year
    1 Album / event
    Example:
    Project 1993
    Derek's Birthday album
    Linda's wedding album
    Project 1994
    Robert Birthday album
    Bob wedding album
    At some point, I will want to export the whole structure or some projects to family and friends who would like to view these images on their PC (not everyone is converted to MAC, yet).
    I understand the Export>Projects command generates a file that can only be understood by Aperture, so useless for sharing with non-aperture users. What I'd like to do is:
    1) Translate the project-album structure to a folder-subfolder structure in order to share images with other PC users.
    2) At the same time export images versions as opposed to masters.
    3) At the same time export all added Metadata.
    I have the feeling Aperture is not ready to do all of the above with one command only. How can I maintain the project structure in order to share with other PC users? I guess only a script will be able to do this...
    Thanks for your feedback.

    fbellay wrote:
    At some point, I will want to export the whole structure or some projects to family and friends who would like to view these images on their PC (not everyone is converted to MAC, yet).
    1) Translate the project-album structure to a folder-subfolder structure in order to share images with other PC users.
    Albums simply don't translate sensibly into Finder folders, in the same way that iTunes playlists don't. Any one Version can exist in any number of Albums, so you'd either end up having to choose one place for the exported file to be and remove it from all the other folders representing Albums, or end up with multiple duplicate copies of the same file.
    Projects, on the other hand, can be mapped directly to Finder folders. So you might be better off using Blue Folders and Projects rather than Projects and Albums.
    2) At the same time export images versions as opposed to masters.
    3) At the same time export all added Metadata.
    Exported Versions will automatically include IPTC & EXIF metadata, assuming you chose an export preset with metadata included.
    I have the feeling Aperture is not ready to do all of the above with one command only.
    There are some AppleScripts that will replicate the structure within Aperture when exporting (or Aperture Assistant* to do it without any scripting knowledge), but as I mentioned already, you will end up with multiple duplicate files.
    Also, you would have to do this again every time that you alter a Version, import files or move Versions around.
    Basically, the virtual nature of both images and organisation in Aperture mean that it won't really work in the way that you wish, and LightRoom wouldn't be much better even though it has closer ties to the folder structure.
    Why not simply export a Projects-worth of images in this way rather than your whole Library?
    Ian
    * http://aperture-assistant.com/docs/how-do-i-copy-apertures-organisational-struct ure-when-exporting
    “I may receive some form of compensation, financial or otherwise, from my recommendation or link.”

  • What is the best team project / folder structure on TFS?

    I am not sure how accurate is this article below from Microsoft but although most of the structure makes sense as shown in the schema, I dont understand the project structure.
    How To: Structure Your Source Control Folders in Team Foundation Server
    So basically according to that structure, we have Main, Development and Releases.
    Main - is the version to be uploaded on the webserver or published latest version of the app.
    Development- is the version to do small changes and bug fixes.
    Releases- Brunches for big changes, new features etc.
    1- are these correct if anyone implemented it?
    2- why under source there is myapp1 and again source, myapp1web etc.? myApp1 is the solution, i guess? but why would I add ClassLibrary under individual projects if it is shared? does it not make more sense to have another folder called "Libraries"
    and pack them all shared libraries unde this folder?
    "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it."

    Hi emil_tr,
    In the begging of the link, you can see "This content is outdated and is no longer being maintained. It is provided as a courtesy for individuals who are still using these technologies". So you might not refer to this document for source
    control with TFS if you use a newer version thant TFS 2005.
    The folder structure in a team project is depend on the developer, you can have your own structure if it works for you. The source folder in your second question is not the name of the folder, it's a description for the folder's usage(a
    folder contains the sources). You can refer to the links below for more information about TFS branching and merging:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/gg598921.aspx
    http://vsarbranchingguide.codeplex.com/
    Best regards, 
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Best practices for folder structure in SOA Project

    Actually, In my project, I have more than 10 BPEL process and several DBAdapters and some HumanTasks. For each BPEL process, JDeveloper creates .bpel, .componentType, wsdl files. For DBAdapters JDeveloper creates lot of files, and same for HumanTasks as well.
    By default Jdeveloper puts all these files in root directory of the Project. It looks messy having 100's of files in root directory.
    How can I organize all these files?
    What are the best practices for folder structure in SOA Project ?
    Thanks

    Yes Yatan. I did noticed that Polling service WSDL disabled in EM . But I want to try this approach beacause I want to move all database related stuff to one composite. I have another composite with 3 BPEL Processes. One BPEL queries external webservice and save the response in DB. One BPEL just fires the first Process(Query) and respond to caller with an unique id. I have Another BPEL which keeps polling on database for 5 sec(I'm using PICK Activity), if there is any new record in database it will retrun to caller. If no new records in database, returns empty to the caller after 5 sec.
    If I put all these in one composite, having lot of files in root directory, the composite really looks very messy.
    As you said, I want to have 2 composites. First Compoiste will have 3 BPEL processes, and 2nd Composite will have DB Polling and DB Save. I will have another project for MDS to store XSDs.
    So because I can't have Polling service as exposed service, I have to keep Polling service in the same Composite where the BPEL is. Now again it goes back to Big and messy project.
    Is there any way I can separate all DB related including polling in a separate Composite ?
    Thanks
    --Sreeny                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

  • Reorganized Project Window (can not restore my folder structure)

    Using CC2014 on an iMac running Yosemite. Haven't updated anything so not sure what the issue is but here goes.
    I typically organize my project files, then all of a sudden AE changed my folder structure. In the Project window it created a Solids, Nulls & Solids, Compositions and AI & PSD folders. All of my comps are in the compositions folder. All Ai and PSD files are in the AI and PSD folder. However, I would rather have it organized my way. I can open a previous version of the file and my organization structure is how I want it. I tried opening AE and restoring the default preferences and that didn't restore my structure. Is there some auto organize shortcut I accidentally hit? Never ran across this issue in all my years using AE. Any help is greatly appreciated!

    ^This is what it organized everything as. If I open the AI & PSD folder for instance, all layers of imported AI files are in there. There are no folders within them to reflect the layers of a certain piece of artwork for instance.
    ^This is the hierarchy of the ones I created. All have sub folders and Comps.
    ^This is the scripts panel here.
    Contacted Adobe, did a screen share with them. They couldn't figure it out either and have said they never seen the issue before. Not sure if it is a bug or what happened. They said they didn't have a shortcut for organizing the project window like that.

  • Using Metadata to generate view as conventional folder structure

    Can Metadata be used to generate a view as the conventional folder drill-down?
    I have a list with metadata for different projects, releases, content type etc and I would like to view them in folder structure with different hierarchies, i.e. using projects--> releases--> content-type as well as release --> projects --> content-type.
    I have asked the same question at : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22693036/using-metadata-to-view-as-conventional-folder-structure

    Hi,
    If your metadata is based on a hierarchical term set you could use ‘Metadata Navigation’.
    You may have to change your information architecture a bit to accommodate this approach. More info on ‘Metadata Navigation’ here:
    http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/sharepoint-server-help/configure-metadata-navigation-for-a-list-or-library-HA101820113.aspx
    Hope this helps
    Cheers
    Matt

  • How to make file folder structure from virtual folders

    lv 2013 sp1
    This is the layout of an example project, (please don't mind the horrible naming)
    When i create a source distribution.. no matter what settings I try, the preview is always like this:
    But I want the folder structure from the build to become as the virtual folder structure. is there any way of doing this without moving them by hand in the file explorer tab?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Unless you use auto-populating folders (which I don't like), the virtual folders are not meant to reflect the location on disk, so it certainly won't be automatic.
    I don't have experience with source distribution, but other build types have the option of configuring destination folders in the Destinations category and then assigning these destinations to items in the projects (including virtual folders, which then takes all the elements inside it) either in the same category or in the one under it, I can't check. I expect that you can do the same in a source distribution.
    Try to take over the world!

  • How to reference a folder/file outside from project folder

    Hi All,
    I have two extensions which wants to share some code(files) placed in a folder outside from source directory.
    for a simple case see the below example.
    created a sample extension HelloWorld whose project structure are as follows
    HelloWorld
         ExtensionContents
              lib/CSInterface-4.0.0.js
              jsx/InDesign.jsx
              HelloWorld.jsx
              index.html.
    I have another folder say "sharedAssets" it contains two images "Orange.gif and pear.gif" which is at same location where HelloWorld and now folder structure becomes
    HelloWorld > ExtensionContents
    sharedAssets > Orange.gif
                             pear.gif
    I have added linked resource folder see the attached screenshot
    I have written following line of codes in index.html
    <body onLoad="onLoaded()">
    <div id="content">
      <ul>
      <li><img src="Orange.gif" width="42" height="42"/></li>
      <li><img src="shared/pear.gif"/></li>
      </ul>
    </div></body>
    but when I opened the extension then it failed to load Orange.gif and pear.gif,
    Please let me know how I could reference an image placed in a folder outside from project folder.
    Regards,
    Alam

    Hi Alam,
    I don't use Eclipse / EB myself so I can be of no help in the way you set an alternate location folder there.
    I've looked in the MXI reference but it seems there's no token equivalent to the "parent folder of all extensions" i.e.
    /Users/Davide/Library/Application\ Support/Adobe/CEPServiceManager4/extensions
    or whatever it will be in the future. This is where Extension Manager puts stuff when the MXI is something like:
    <file   source="HTML/com.example.helloworld.zxp"
            destination=""
            file-type="CSXS"
            products="Photoshop,Photoshop32,Photoshop64"
            minVersion="14.0" />
    that is, destination is blank, file-type is "CSXS".
    I've never tried to put there stuff other than ZXP - you can give it a try.
    An alternative escamotage could be to use an external folder, which path token exists both in MXI land *and* in (CSInterface or ExtendScript).
    That is, a place Extension Manager installs your shared content; which path can be reached from the panel or the JSX.
    As an example $userdatafolder/alam/shared in MXI, and Folder.userData/alam/shared in JSX, or SystemPath.USER_DATA/alam/shared in JS.
    There are other product specific tokens (Photoshop Script folder for instance) where you can put things into.
    Regards
    Davide Barranca
    www.davidebarranca.com
    www.cs-extensions.com

  • SAP Netweaver Portal - Folder structure and report publishing strategy

    Hi gurus,
    I'm working on a project in which we are publishing BW reports in SAP Netweaver Portal (prior to this, we were using SAP Bex Browser) organizing it by Department (workset, 2nd lvl of navigation), Business Processes (workset, 3rd lvl of navigation) and "iview types" (transactions, queries, dashboards and so on). On 1st level we have a workset simply called "Reports".
    For each PFCG role we have on BW (ABAP Server), we created a portal role and defined which of the higher navigation tiers is visible to users (delta-linking the top level navigation worksets to the portal role and setting visible accordingly) and then we assigned Portal roles to the appropriated Group (PFCG role) so all users that have access to certain PFCG role can have access to the corresponding Portal role.
    For example:
    In BW (ABAP) we have a PFCG Role: Sales PMR Analysis - Administrator, which grants access to Sales Infoproviders, queries and data for PMR analysis. The user that have access to it, should be able to see:
    |Reports|
    |Sales Administration|
    v PMR Analysis
      > Web Queries
      > Transactions
      > Dashboards
      > Workbooks
    In Portal we create a workset that has: "Reports" and under it, all Departments (Sales Administration, Financial, Services, Human Resources and so on) set as "not visible". We create a Portal role called PMR Analysis and add the Report/Departments workset, set Sales Administration as visible and add worksets/folders named PMR Analysis, Web queries, Transactions, etc, and all the corresponding iviews under it.
    If we assign this new Portal role to the Group of the corresponding PFCG role, the user will see exactly as the example from above.
    Pros: The users have a clean view of the reports he/she has access.
    Cons: The users doesn't have a clear view of what is available in BW so he can request access. There might be some useful report lost in on of the hundreds of BW roles that he doesn't know it exist.
    One of the options would be to grant visibility to ALL departments, business processes and iviews in Portal and let PFCG security roles control user access, but that might be confusing to have an overwhelming amount of links, making it hard to find what the user needs, specially during first access. Not to mention possible security breaches.
    So, I'd like to know how other consultants are defining this kind of folder structure and report publishing strategy in Portal. Ideally we would like to be able to have:
    - Visibility of all existant reports even those that the user does not have acess (so he can learn that it exist and request access)
    - Clean view of reports, segmented by department and business processes.
    - Possibility to search for reports, even for those that the user does not have access.
    I'd appreciate if you guys can share your experience on this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Leandro

    Cons: The users doesn't have a clear view of what is available in BW so he can request access. There might be some useful report lost in on of the hundreds of BW roles that he doesn't know it exist
    This is not a refutation: your BW developers/consultants should be able to write reports, which points you in case of insufficent backend rights. EP is not designed to be familiar with ABAP security concept and cant take any influence at it.
    One of the options would be to grant visibility to ALL departments, business processes and iviews in Portal and let PFCG security roles control user access, but that might be confusing to have an overwhelming amount of links, making it hard to find what the user needs, specially during first access. Not to mention possible security breaches.
    Yes, bad idea.
    - Visibility of all existant reports even those that the user does not have acess (so he can learn that it exist and request access)
    As you already wrote on your own, this would be not good
    - Clean view of reports, segmented by department and business processes.
    - Possibility to search for reports, even for those that the user does not have access.
    This is not covered by SAP, if you wanna provide that, develop it on your own.
    cheers

  • BI content with folder structure in portal Content Area

    HI Dear Friends,
    I have  a requirement in my current project where i am integrating the BI reports with SAP EP.Iviews are associated with BI Reports.In the portal on clicking workset it should display folders in the portal content area with Icons instead of in Detail navigation .On click of the displayed folders it should display its sub content with Icons.
    I tried in all ways but later i came to know there there is a SAP BI business package which would come up with predifined iviews associated with BI. By importing this business package we can dispaly the  BI content in the portal in a folder format .
    I am using BI and EP 7.0 versions.
    Ratnakar

    Ratnakar,
       Let me understand your requirements, correct me if I understood it wrong. You need to display BI reports in Folder structure that is similar when you log on through BEx analyzer or WAD. If this is correct, then you need to upload the BI Role which contain all the required Folder structures and it BI Queries or BI Queries url assigned to that role.Once you upload this role on to portal , you will see folder structure on PCA.
    Example
    BI Reports  - Folder 1
      I--> FI reports  -- Subfolder 1
      I            I--> AP reports 1
      I--> CO reports  -- Subfolder 2
                   I--> Cost Report 1         
    Hope it helps,
    Cheers,
    Balaji

  • Link to another Project folder

    I need to link to a module in another project folder. I used
    the click box and in the On Success chose Open other project and
    picked the swf file using the elipsis. However, when I ran it, it
    was looking for the file in the same folder as my current course
    not in the other project folder. Can I not link to another project
    folder using Captivate. We want to reuse components from one
    project to another without having multiple copies in every folder.
    Thanks for all your help.

    With JavaScript, you're limited primarily by your
    imagination, so the example I offered was intentionally generic.
    In practical use, you would probably want Captivate to pass
    only the destination folder & filename and let the JavaScript
    function create the full path. Assuming the relative folder
    structure is the same on each server, you'd only need a single
    generic function.
    For example, if you wanted to launch a file named
    "introduction.htm" in an adjacent folder named "course02", you
    could add the following to Captivate:
    javascript: goToMovie('course02','introduction.htm');
    and add the following to your standard.js file (so it gets
    automatically propagated to each published course):
    function goToMovie(strFolder, strFile)
    var arrPath = window.location.href.split('/');
    arrPath[arrPath.length-2] = strFolder;
    arrPath[arrPath.length-1] = strFile;
    window.location.href = arrPath.join('/');
    The Captivate function passes the folder and file name as
    quoted string variables and the JavaScript function then uses those
    variables to create a new URL. You can get as fancy as you like,
    such as adding logic to go up more than one folder level, but
    hopefully you get the general idea.

  • How can I make a folder structure for both PSE and Premiere Elements?

    I have recently bought bundled PSE 10 and Prem Elements 10 ... (but have been using PSE6 for years)
    I have lots of jpeg photos on an external drive in folders with a heirarchical structure eg. Pictures ... Friends ... 2011 ... 2011_12_02_Margate_seagulls.jpg  I also have loads of photos that are simply there waiting to be sorted and are in their native format e.g PIC_6120.jpg     Additionally I have .MOV files dumped from my JVC standard def camera some of which are custom named, others are left as is.  I now own a hi-def lumix which takes great jpgs and also video MTS files. After lots of searching on the net for the best way to get all this organised I am at a standstill. I feel that I need an external folder system (ie one that does not rely 100% on adobe and its categotries and tags) because I have had catastropic losses when using earlier photoshop progs. I also see the benefit of using tags. So...
    Is there a simple (and best) way to order my photos and hi-def video while taking into account content I already have shot/videod?  I am happy to hear reasons and see examples why I should trust PSE/Prem E - but I would also like to see if it makes sense to use folders. Ideally i would love a practical folder structuring method that incorporates both video and still content. I have posted here because it is important I organise my video better and have a flexible system that allows for drafts and reworking my Hi-def content.
    I have tried to find the info but it is so piecemeal and I have faith in the people on here ... Any links and advice would be much appreciated

    In generic terms there are three methods of filing just about anything:
    Structured by event
    Structured by type
    Unstructured
    Event might be occasion or date or a specific project. For this type of structure you would store all your assets related to that event, regardless of whether it is still, image or audio, in one place.
    Type would typically be by the type of asset. All your videos in one place, stills in another, audio in another  etc... In business for example in the eighties (when personal computing became prevalent in the workplace) staff would religiously have all their word processor documents in one place, spreadsheets in another, powerpoints in yet another etc.... Dreadfully inefficient.
    Unstructured would be a case of storing things wherever you liked and accessing them via tags or albums - but you've said you want to avoid this.
    Personally I let the application store things according to the defaults for the different import types but then tag them. Essentially I follow the 'unstructured' style. For anything major I create a project directory and move all the project assets into it (i.e. selective structure by event).
    If you search the Tips & Tricks forum I think Bill Hunt (who does this stuff for a living) describes his structured folder flow in great detail.
    Cheers,
    Neale
    Insanity is hereditary, you get it from your children

  • Rescan Project Folder for New images

    I've got an existing folder structure on my hard drive that I wanted to maintain but try importing into aperture. I imported each folder into aperture as a project. I imported, but left the files in their existing location. Since then i've added addtional files to various folders in Finder. This is where my question comes. Is it possible to have Aperture rescan the folder associated to a project and have it import new files into aperture?

    See my Aperture AppleScripts page at <http://homepage.mac.com/brettgross/Aperture/ApertureAppleScripts/index.html> for the Sync Folder into Project script. I think it will do what you want.
    That is what I use it for, at least...

  • Why is Aperture folder structure ignored in iPhoto?

    I'm not sure about others but I would like to use iPhoto and Aperture together because I find iPhoto to be a lot quicker to open and work than Aperture, so I would like to be able to do most of my work there, and then use Aperture for more heavy editing etc.
    That said, when I first opened up my Aperture Library in iPhoto, I noticed that the folder structure had gone out the window. Projects had become Events, but both albums and folders had disappeared from Aperture, thus throwing my entire Aperture library into disarray. Either Aperture albums or folders should be supported, since albums (that look like folders...) are supported by iPhoto...
    Does anyone know why, if Apple has unified the two, they have not done anything to better map the structure from one to the other? Or if there are any workarounds?
    Thank you in advance.

    That said, when I first opened up my Aperture Library in iPhoto, I noticed that the folder structure had gone out the window. Projects had become Events, but both albums and folders had disappeared from Aperture, thus throwing my entire Aperture library into disarray
    Hmm, I see something different, when I open an Aperture library in iPhoto. Both the nested folders and the albums are there. Can it be, that in your iPhoto view the folders are hidden? There should be a disclosure button to right of the "Events" label in the source list, like this.
    Press "HIDE" or "UNHIDE" to reveal or hide any sections in the Source list. These buttons will only appear, if you hover the mouse right beside any caption in capital letters. (Tested with iPhoto 9.4.2)
    Regards
    Léonie

Maybe you are looking for

  • Adobe Camera Raw 5.3 vs. 4.2

    Just noticed (Adobe website) that there is a new version of Adobe Camera Raw available.  I am using Photoshop Elements 6 which comes with Adobe Camera Raw 4.2.  The latest version is ACR5.3.  Does anyone know if there are any new features or capabili

  • Best export format for viewing on external TV?

    I have a small project that I'd like to show via hooking my laptop up to a TV. What's the best Quicktime format/setting for exporting for doing this? Any suggestions? Thanks, Kristin.

  • REP-0081 error when emailing report output

    I am using RUN_REPORT_OBJECT to execute a report from a form. I have the report set up as a Report object in the form. The report runs fine to screen or to file, but I am getting an error when attempting to email report in batch mode: REP-0081: Error

  • Printing a Report from a ALV Grid

    We just did a kenrel upgrade from 6.20 to 6.40 Now, when we go to run a report using an ALV grid it will not print the subtotals. I can see the information fine on the screen but will only print lines with no data! Any help will be great! thanks... -

  • FRM-99999: Failed to connect to the Server / UNIX

    Upon invoking http://hostname.domainname:1080/web_html/olftest.htm I am getting the following error: FRM-99999: Failed to connect to the Server: hostname.domainname:9000 We are using the following: ========================= Server: Unix : Sun Solaris