Proper default permissions/ ownership for OS X  2ndary drive?

I recently bought I new primary sata drive for a MacPro and loaded Leopard on it while keeping a 2ndary internal sata drive ... which included data ... intact.
Now under Leopard, under permissions for the 2ndary internal sata drive, it sees an "unknown" account (which is the previous Tiger owner) and
it doesn't allow any writing/ deleting on the 2ndary drive.
I know how to change the permissions and ownership but don't know exactly
what Leopard default ownership and permissions I should assign to the 2ndary drive.
The new Home acct name, System, Admin, Everyone etc.
Usually there is a cascading list of 2 or 3 but I can't remember what
they should be.
Can anyone tell me?
db

Apparently the permissions existing on this drive came from a previous user account. Since you seem not to be the user or the account bore a different username than you are now using, the files on that drive are protected from access unless you can log into the old user account.
Changing the drive's defaults may not help, but they would be exactly the same as you find on your existing startup volume: owner is system, group is admin, both read/write. If maintaining permissions isn't needed then you can CTRL- or RIGHT-click on the drive's icon and in the Ownership section of Get Info check the box to Ignore permissions. If you need to change all the permissions to conform to you as the current user then this won't accomplish the goal.

Similar Messages

  • Default permissions?

    Is there a way to modify my system's default permissions? For example, when I create a new file/directory it will automatically have my preferred permissions. I've tinkered with umask, but haven't found it to work for me... am I missing something?

    Did you try setting your umask in th specific users .bashrc file. any changes you make here will be saved. Just entering the Umask command from the bash shell will change the permissions just for that session it will go back to default after you log out.  All you should have to use is a text editor and be in the users home that you wanna change and type nano  .bashrc (i use nano) or vi .bashrc etc...... then all you should have to type is the umask value. Im pretty sure that the umask is subtracted from the the current directory permissons a umask of 022 give us the 755 that is the default. so you would type "umask  022" then save and exit . Then test it
    hope this helps
    Last edited by Ronin15 (2010-06-12 04:35:54)

  • Code for restoring default permissions to etc/hosts?

    Could someone help me with the proper code for setting the permissions on etc/hosts to their proper default setting?

    sudo chmod 644 /etc/hosts
    sudo chown root:wheel /etc/hosts
    Those are the settings on my iMac.
    If you use an editor such as
    sudo nano /etc/hosts
    you will most likely not have these problems.
    If you are a more experienced Unix user, then vim or emacs are good choices as well, but both of those editors have steep learning curves.
    Message was edited by: BobHarris

  • Set default permissions for new files?

    We have a small LAN where different users often need to open and resave each others' files. No server, just a bunch of client computers on ethernet sharing an internet router.
    Each time a user creates a file, that file's permissions default to read only for anyone but that user. How can I set up the default permissions so that any newly-created files default to Read & Write for "groups" and "others".
    I anticipate I will have to make this change for each user on each workstation.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks

    If you want users to share files then have them place the file in the /Users/Shared/ folder. Files placed in that folder can be accessed by any user.
    Why reward points?(Quoted from Discussions Terms of Use.)
    The reward system helps to increase community participation. When a community member gives you (or another member) a reward for providing helpful advice or a solution to their question, your accumulated points will increase your status level within the community.
    Members may reward you with 5 points if they deem that your reply is helpful and 10 points if you post a solution to their issue. Likewise, when you mark a reply as Helpful or Solved in your own created topic, you will be awarding the respondent with the same point values.

  • What is factory default "Sharing & Permissions" setting for User folders?

    System:
    Mac OS X Lion 10.7.2
    MacBook Air (Mid 2011)
    Single User – Administrative Account
    Question:
    What is factory default “Sharing & Permissions” setting for User folders (Desktop, Downloads, Library, Movies, Music, Pictures, Public), subfolders, and documents and other contents?
    I’m thinking the factory default “Sharing & Permissions” for all of the above (except Drop Box in the Public folder) is as follows, but not certain.
    Name                          Privilege
    myusername (Me)    Read & Write
    staff                            Read only
    everyone                   Read only

    Are these also the settings on your Documents folder and the various files in the Documents folder?  Same question for your Library folder?
    Name                          Privilege
    myusername (Me)    Read & Write
    everyone                   No Access

  • What are the default permissions for "self-signed" applets?

    Hello!
    I have a self-signed applet (=signed with a self made certificate) and under most plugin-enviroments java asks the user if it accepts this certificate as trustworth.
    On my linux-box I do not have any problems to write files to the local filesystem after I accepted this self-signed applet.
    However I've often read that users must grant some permissions even for signed applets, so is there a list of permissions that are denied by default?
    Are there differences between java releases starting with 1.2.2?
    Thanks in advance, lg Clemens

    Default settings are like you said, jre asks the user and everything will work.
    Unless.your applet uses classes that are not signed like with calls from javascript to your applet the plugin.jar is used and you'll get an exception when writing to files.
    When writing to files the OS might not allowe the user to write to a certain file or folder.
    Don't know what type of exception will be thrown if the OS doesn't allowe it but it has
    nothing to do with applet permissions.
    To change the default setting you can add the following line in the grant { bit of the
    java.policy
    permission java.lang.RuntimePermission "usePolicy";
    When this line is there all signatures will be ignored and an applet can only do extra
    things (like access to local files) if a policy is set up for this applet.
    To find out what's wrong at your clients site you should ask them to send a full trace
    and check that. I hope you did a .printStacktrace() on the exception in your code so
    you can see if any other classes are involved when the exception is thrown.
    To turn the full trace on (windows) you can start the java console, to be found here:
    C:\Program Files\Java\j2re1.4...\bin\jpicpl32.exe
    In the advanced tab you can fill in something for runtime parameters fill in this:
    -Djavaplugin.trace=true -Djavaplugin.trace.option=basic|net|security|ext|liveconnect
    if you cannot start the java console check here:
    C:\Documents and Settings\userName\Application Data\Sun\Java\Deployment\deployment.properties
    I think for linux this is somewhere in youruserdir/java (hidden directory)
    add or change the following line:
    javaplugin.jre.params=-Djavaplugin.trace\=true -Djavaplugin.trace.option\=basic|net|security|ext|liveconnect
    for 1.5:
    deployment.javapi.jre.1.5.0.args=-Djavaplugin.trace\=true -Djavaplugin.trace.option\=basic|net|security|ext|liveconnect
    The trace is here:
    C:\Documents and Settings\your user\Application Data\Sun\Java\Deployment\log\plugin...log
    I think for linux this is somewhere in youruserdir/java (hidden directory)

  • Issues with setting appropriate ownership for file system

    Hi All,
    We are using ACFS File system. For some of the mount point we have set to change ownership according to requirement in rc.local file So that all permissions remain intact when the server restarts. But the permissions are not taking into account. Only after the rc.local is executed ASM disks are mounted I guess. Is there any where else can we write scripts to change ownership of mount points for ACFS so that when the disks are mounted proper Unix permissions are setup.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Vikas Krishna

    To configure raw devices if you are using Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.0:
    To confirm that raw devices are enabled, enter the following command:
    # chkconfig --list
    Scan the output for raw devices. If you do not find raw devices, then use the following command to enable the raw device service:
    # chkconfig --level 345 rawdevices on
    After you confirm that the raw devices service is running, you should change the default ownership of raw devices. When you restart a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.0 system, ownership and permissions on raw devices revert by default to the root user. If you are using raw devices with this operating system for your Oracle Clusterware files, then you need to override this default.
    To ensure correct ownership of these devices when the operating system is restarted, create a new file in the /etc/udev/permissions.d directory, called oracle.permissions, and enter the raw device permissions information. Using the example device names discussed in step 5 of the previous section, the following is an example of the contents of /etc/udev/permissions.d/oracle.permissions:
    # OCR
    raw/raw[12]:root:oinstall:0640
    # Voting Disks
    raw/raw[3-5]:oracle:oinstall:0640
    # ASM
    raw/raw[67]:oracle:dba:0660
    After creating the oracle.permissions file, the permissions on the raw devices are set automatically the next time the system is restarted. To set permissions to take effect immediately, without restarting the system, use the chown and chmod commands:
    chown root:oinstall /dev/raw/raw[12]
    chmod 640 /dev/raw/raw[12]
    chown oracle:oinstall /dev/raw/raw[3-5]
    chmod 640 /dev/raw/raw[3-5]
    chown oracle:dba /dev/raw/raw[67]
    chmod 660 /dev/raw/raw[67]
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/rac.102/b28759/preparing.htm#CHDGEEDC
    Edited by: Babu Baskar on Apr 18, 2010 1:33 PM

  • NFS Default Permissions

    I was looking into a problem we're having using an NFS shared volume for several users.
    I want to find a way to change the default permissions when we leave files on this mounted volume so that files we leave (or create) on the volume default to having group r/w permission. As it is, the default is for the group to be read-only.
    I found a separate archived thread on this:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=1625782
    There it was suggested that changing the global umask setting would change all default behaviors to read & write for group:
    defaults write -g NSUmask 2
    This does seem to change the new file defaults for all files written on one's hard drive, but that didn't seem to fix everything.
    - If the file is already group "read-only" then it stays that way when copied to the NFS volume
    - If the file is already group "read & write" then it stays that way when copied [good]
    - If you create a new folder
    - If you create a new folder either locally or on the remote volume USING THE FINDER GUI, then it's read-only.
    - If you create a new folder either locally or on the remote volume USING THE COMMAND LINE, then it's "read & write" [good]
    So the question I have, should anyone have any deep insights into permissions are:
    1) Can you change the default folder permissions created through the Finder GUI?
    2) Is there any way to make copied files default to new permissions, or will they always retain their base permissions.
    It's obviously much easier for several people using the same folder to have compatible permissions use than to have to remember to manually change them every time a file/folder is copied/created!

    "1) Can you change the default folder permissions created through the Finder GUI?"
    Hmm, the answer should be "yes", but it also shouldn't be necessary - the "Finder" by default would be expected to use the 'NSUmask' value set in the NSGlobal domain so it is odd that in your case, "If you create a new folder either locally or on the remote volume USING THE FINDER GUI, then it's read-only." But anyway, to independently set the 'umask' for "Finder", try:<pre>defaults write com.apple.finder umask 2</pre>This setting (and it is 'umask', not 'NSUmask' in this case) takes effect after the "Finder" is restarted and does not require a logout.
    "2) Is there any way to make copied files default to new permissions, or will they always retain their base permissions."
    This one, I don't know. I could have swore that in early versions of "Panther" that copied items were considered "new" and the global umask value applied, but the behaviour had changed by later versions to preserve permissions, and it looks like 10.4 behaves the same way.
    I don't know anything about NFS - does it have any sort of "inherit permissions" setting like AFP? AFP shares can be configured so that copied items will inherit the permissions (and or ownership) of the parent folder... actually it seems to follow some strange rules so that in practice, both options often need to be set, but that's beside the point. It might be worth looking into to see if something like that is available...

  • Change File Permissions (Ownership) Recursively

    While running under my User, I restored some files (from Retrospect) for another User on my MacBook.  Using the Finder, I moved them to the other User's folder but they when I look at the directories and files that I moved, I see that I am still the "owner" in the file permissions.
    I need to change file permission ownership recursively down the hierarchy of several folders, e.g., Documents, etc.
    I'm happy to use chown in Terminal if someone will just give me a clue on the proper command.
    Thanks for your help.
      - nello
    MacBook (Early 2006)
    10.6.8

    Well,
    $ man chown
    gives you the chown manual page, which is always a good idea to read if you're not familiar with the command. In this instance, I think the command would be
    $ chown -vR <owner> <file>
    But you might feel more comfortable with a GUI tool like BatChmod.

  • Changing the default associated view for a related entity

    A question from a peer:
    Hey there
    Do you know how in CRM 2015 to change the default associated view for a related entity?
    Say you are in an Account and from the menu open the opportunities for that account.
    That new pop up window states “Opportunity Associated View” I want to change that to “My Custom View”
    I thought we covered this in class years back but cannot remember

    There are a few ways to get what you want, the easiest being
    Create a document as you want it for a particular site, save it is junk.php or similar and create a new file by saving as this as the proper document name such as index.php
    Use the Dreamweaver template system, i.e. create a template with a .dwt.php extension like template.dwt.php and use that to create new pages.
    There are other ways like creating your own php template system. But you can put that in the too hard basket.

  • HT201342 In Apple Mail, how do I change the default outgoing address for mailboxes that I've set up?

    In Apple Mail (Yosemite on a MacBook Pro), the default address for outgoing messages from mailboxes that I've set up that are *not* tied to separate email accounts has suddenly become my iCloud address (which I almost never use). I've got my default set to use whatever address is the default for the mailbox I'm in. This works fine for mailboxes associated with different mail accounts, and until recently it worked fine for mailboxes that I had set up for convenience, using my default email address (which is an Earthlink address I've had for many years). Somewhere within the last year, perhaps with an upgrade to the OS, I've found that outgoing mail from one of those mailboxes (but not from the general Inbox) defaults to my iCloud address. I have to manually choose a different address each time (which is hard to remember to do). This is new behavior, and very unwelcome. But I can see no way to change the default email address associated with each mailbox.
    How do I undo this unwanted connection?

    Hi everyone
    Sorry however I'm experiencing a similiar issue, in that I have 10 differing email accounts.
    However in the default email accounts, for some bizarre reason, only 4 show, being icloud, one of my older yahoo email accounts, my work email and then "From My PC".
    I run two other businesses of which I have a proper Google Mail Business Accountsfor each, but non of my google email address show in the default list.
    Is there any reason why?
    I actually want one of those to show.
    I have put my google mail to the top of the inbox, however it still doesn't show?
    I've also put the default calendar as my google business account but still the default account doesn't display.
    Any ideas?
    Jonathan

  • What should default permissions be of the Groups folder be?

    While trying to sort out our Group shared folders permissions problems I might have changed the permissions of the Group folder (/Volumes/Server/Groups) in Server Admin.
    Can anyone tell me what the default permissions for that folder should be?

    I had a similar problem:
    <http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5876784#5876784>
    and Gerrit came to the rescue! Wonder if you migrated from Tiger and if so then the above thread might have some answers for you. Seems like the standard Group ID (gid) changed from Tiger to Leopard and has wreaked havoc on file sharing. I was able to remedy my situation (so far - still not thoroughly tested) by changing the gid of all files back to 20...which matches "staff" on the clients. This is still confusing and Apple's documentation is half-baked regarding this as far as I'm concerned.

  • Setting default export quality for PDFs in Pages 5.0

    Hi,
    Anyone know if it is possible to set a default export quality for PDFs in Pages 5.0.  Even if it remembered the last used setting that would be helpful.
    Thanks,
    Nick

    OK,  I have managed to get higher quality images from the PDF renderer. Here is what I have found:
    1) The PDF renderer in Reporting Services 2005 will size all images that it is given at 96 DPI no matter what DPI the image is when you pass it to the renderer. That means that a 300 DPI image or even a 600 DPI image will be sized in the PDF as if it is only 96 DPI. That means your high DPI image will render much larger than you expect.
    So you might expect a 300 DPI image that is 6.5 inches wide to render properly at 1950 pixels. Yet, the PDF renderer will size it as it were 96 DPI which would make the image 20.3 inches long!
    2) There is good news though. Despite sizing the images as if they were 96 DPI, the PDF renderer appears to render higher DPI images at a higher quality than 96 DPI. So despite the sizing being wrong, the image actually is rendering at a higher quality.
    This means that you should size the image to the proper number of inches based on 96 DPI calculations. Then you can use Bitmap.SetResolution to set your images to at least 300 DPI.  That should give you a higher quality image that is the proper number of pixels to fit properly in your report.
    I am able to do all of this sizing dynamically because I am using objects as my data sources, but I am sure there are VB functions you could use in the report itself to accomplish the same task.
    It is late, and I've been at this project all day long, so forgive me if I have explained anything poorly or gotten any concepts long. Yet, at this late hour, I believe this is what the renderer is doing.
    I hope this helps someone else in the future, or at least points them in the right direction.

  • Default permissions issue

    I recently tried upgrading our server from 10.4 to 10.5 and we're having trouble with default permissions. We have a small mixed AFP/SMB workgroup and we want items created in sharepoints to be readable and writable by other members of the group. In 10.4 the setting under AFP for default permissions for new files and folders didn't seem to work (but I got round it by manually changing a umask setting). After we upgraded and were having probIems with restricted permissions, I looked for that setting in 10.5. The manual, under "Changing AFP Settings for a Share Point", says:
    *If you are using only POSIX permissions, choose a method for assigning default access*
    *privileges for new files and folders in the share point:*
    *To have new items use default POSIX permissions, select “Use standard POSIX*
    behavior.”
    *To have new items adopt the privileges of the enclosing item, select “Inherit*
    *permissions from parent.”*
    However the setting does not seem to be there in Server Admin. I thought maybe it was because ACLs were enabled, so I followed the procedure described in the manual for disabling them, but after restart, they were still enabled, and still no AFP default permissions setting. Again, the manual says
    *You can unnecessarily complicate file access management if you’re not careful. Keep it*
    *simple. If standard POSIX permissions do the job, use those, but if you must use ACLs,*
    *avoid customizing permissions unless you need to.*
    But it seems I am being forced into using ACLs to do something which surely should be straighforward. Or am I missing something?

    Okay, I think I got where I wanted to get to using ACLs, but it would have been nice if the manual hadn't been a little misleading...

  • Mass-Update Default Print Properties for Spool Authorization (S_SPO_ACT)

    Dear Experts
    To protect HR spool requests it is possible to use the print-authorization in combination with the authorization object S_SPO_ACT.
    In case a HR user prints a form the the print-popup will default the user-parameter SAU for print-authorization. When printed like this the value of the SAU-parameter will be added to the spool request.
    In case the HR user prints a ABAP-list the value of the user-parameter SAU is not defaulted in the print popup. Instead seperatly saved defaults print properties (see print popup -> properties) are taken.
    How can I mass-change these default print properties? How can I set these default print properties for other users?
    Thanks in advance

    Please note that with SAP BASIS release later than 620, parameter id 'SAU' is either no longer used or only used in a limit fashion. The default spool authorization is now stored in cluster 'UV' instead of at 'USR05' / parid 'SAU' .
    If your users already have 'SAU' parameter populated with proper spool authorization, SAP has an ABAP util 'RSTRANSPARAMSAU' to store this in the cluster. Once you run this util, default spool authorization will
    be populated properly each time spool files are created.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Service entry sheet posting error

    Dear SAP Gurus, While service entry sheet saving,system floats following error: "Error posting acceptance of entry sheet NO 1123456789 choose: 1)error log 2)Save w/o acceptance 3)exit without saving" what couuld be the reason for above mentioned erro

  • Unable to use System Update

    I have tried using System Update several times, from the date the system was new and was unable to successfully update my system. The program connects and states that several updates are available and then I allow it ot download all the packages. How

  • Help!  Why won't iTunes 7.5 dowload to my pc?

    I have windows xp, 512 ram, and 1.86 ghz processor. I just added more ram (from 256 to 512) hoping that would solve the problem but it hasn't. Any suggestions? I want to download some songs that require itunes 7.2 or greater. Is 7.2 available for dow

  • How can I stop Firefox from 'talking' every time I click a new item on my laptop screen?

    Without my doing anything, all of a sudden my Firefox started talking every time I click something on my laptop screen. Example: I clicked the link that took me to this page. Firefox said "new window... Firefox menu ... Ask a New Question ..." I don'

  • Iphone text app and setting app disappear

    my iphone text app and setting disappear and my phone won't let me reset it