Publish HTML to xMII 12.0 and system performance is poor

Hi all,
I'm having an issue since we upgraded to 12.0.   When I publish my page to MII, the whole system slows down.  This lasts forever.  ( 2 - 3 minutes)  And then the HTML pages return to normal processing speed.
As I develop, I publish many times in one day or even an hour.   Has anyone else experienced this?  Is there a way to "fix" it?  Any settings/changes?
Thank you,
Michelle

Well - maybe publishing a lot not the right thing to do.
It's my development system.   The way I program is by pieces.   I do the first change.  Publish.   Test to see if there are any errors.  If there are errors, I correct and then publish again.
Next - I add the next part of requirements and then publish again.
I will publish a lot if I'm having trouble with a piece of code.
I don't know of anyway to test my HTML page prior to publishing.
Michelle

Similar Messages

  • How do I block an ad that opens up a new Firefox window and keeps telling me my system performance is poor? I can't even capture the link.

    This particular ad, supposedly from a Windows Certified Partner, opens in a second Firefox window and keeps flashing the message that my System Performance is Poor, wanting me to click on their ad and let them do whatever nasty things they want to my system. I have not been able to capture the path but next time it comes up, I will write down all that I can see.
    If I have closed my main Firefox screen first, and then close out this ad, the next time I open Firefox, the ad opens and all my standard tabs are gone, requiring me to reopen each one seperately (Facebook, Google, etc).

    Just to address the last point: check your History menu to see whether you have the Restore Previous Session option and use that if you can. If that is grayed out or doesn't restore everything, check the Recently Closed Windows and Recently Closed Tabs lists for other pages.
    The unwanted window may be generated by an add-on. Try disabling ALL nonessential or unrecognized extensions on the Add-ons page. Either:
    * Ctrl+Shift+a
    * "3-bar" menu button (or Tools menu) > Add-ons
    In the left column, click Extensions. Then, if in doubt, disable.
    Usually a link will appear above at least one disabled extension to restart Firefox. You can complete your work on the tab and click one of the links as the last step.
    Any improvement?
    Here are some other things to check:
    (1) user.js file that changes Firefox startup behavior and overrides your preferences. This article describes how to track that down and delete it if you have one: [[How to fix preferences that won't save]].
    (2) Possible hijacked shortcut. Check the "target" of the desktop icon you use to start Firefox to see whether it lists the unwanted page. To do that:
    right-click the icon > Properties > Shortcut tab
    For 64-bit Windows 7, the Target should be no more and no less than this:
    "C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe"
    (3) Possible undisclosed bundle items. If you have installed any free software recently, check your Windows Control Panel, Uninstall a program for surprises. If you click the "Installed on" column head to group by date, it is easier to spot bundled junk. Remove everything suspicious or unrecognized.
    (4) Supplemental clean up scans. Our support article lists tools other Firefox users have found helpful: [[Troubleshoot Firefox issues caused by malware]].
    Hopefully that cures it.

  • HD and System Performance Question

    Hello,
    I've a standard 160 Go 8 Mo cache HD (from origin) in bay 1 with the OS X System, and 2 other 300 Go 16 Mo Maxtor HD in bay 2 and bay 3.
    First, I'd kike to know if it makes a real difference if using a 16 Mo cache HD instead of a 8 Mo for the OS X performance.
    Then, if I decide to migrate the OS X in the HD in bay 2 or 3, is there any influence on performances or does OS X have to be installed in HD in bay 1 only ?
    Thanks for your help and support.
    Lionel.

    I use to think that a 16MB cache made a lot of difference. However, based on testing I found that the difference is usually minor. As an example see how little difference the Seagate 16MB provides in this AMUG review:
    http://www.amug.org/amug-web/html/amug/reviews/articles/seagate16/
    The real performance factor is how fast the hard drive is not how big the cache is. A medium speed drive will not become fast by slapping a 16MB cache on it. The Maxtor Maxline III's all have 16MB and they perform very well. However, placing a 16MB cache on a Seagate 7200.8 or 7200.9 does not increase the speed of the hard drive significantly.
    Talk to any sales person and they will always tell you that you will notice a difference in performance between the same drive with a 8MB vs 16MB cache. I found this generic response not to be true.
    While a fast hard drive usually has a 16MB cache. The 16MB cache in and of its self did not make the hard drive fast.

  • Article Listing and system performance

    While creating physical inventory document, we experienced running each site for 25 to 30 minutes.   With over 140 sites, it will take approximately 3 days just to create the PID's.  We had consultants looking into our system and suggested that we could delist to improve the PI process and overall system performance.  Through initial testing of delisting (WSP6), it did not help the PI processing time(creating PID's through MI31).  So, I thought that we should archive site data only, but not at Client level, meaning delete all site extensions.  Can somebody tell me (a) if this is the right approach?, (b) what are the things to watch out for? (c) can I list the article again if later we find a need for it?
    Looking forward to some help.  Thanks.

    Re-posting this message.  Can somebody help?
    Thank you.

  • Classification data organization and system performance

    We are planning on setting up classification for the material master. Reviewing discussions on the topic indicate the potential for system performance issues with search response and file sizes. Performance is dependent on several factors such as the number of material numbers, classes and characteristics, use of interval values, depth of hierarchies ect. 
    We have a significant number of material numbers, looking to have at least 15 classes with about 200 total characteristics.  The extent of superior class linkage is undetermined at this time.
    I am looking for a guideline or tool that would help us understand if our design is efficient or will lead to long term performance issues. Is there a resource or documentation that gives some examples of situatinos where classification got our of hand and why?
    Thank you
    Brian

    Hello Brian,
    There is no document or guidlines as such however you should keep the tables upto date . Also we recommend to use CLST for updating statistics regularly. Are you looking to assign 15 classes for material ? It should not affect the performance as much but you should keep characteristics to minimal in that case. Also are you using VC as there are lot of recommendations for VC but in general for classification keeping the stats upto date is most important.
    Thanks
    Amber

  • Possible solution to wireless/bluetooth/and system performance issues.

    I had a TON of issues with Leopard after my Tiger Install, network, bluetooth, video playback, iTunes playback, system performance and freezing just to name a few. I tried everything (reseting PRAM, etc.) to fix the problem and have done a variety if installations half a dozen times. Yesterday I took out my 3rd party memory I had installed (Corsair if anyone cares) and did an erase and install. I've had no problems so far and everything seems to be running great. I'll keep everyone posted on any progress. You may want to try this if you think you may have the same issue.

    Hi
    I may have the solution to slow performance when using multi core processing. I was testing out realflow 2013 and noticed simulations were talking a long time to finish when using maximum threads 32. I set the threads to 8 and the simumlation was twice as fast which did not make any sense to me. The simulation was taking 1min 24 secs to finish using 32 threads and 45sec using 8 threads. I realized their has to be a problem here. So I went into my BIOS and disabled Hyper Threading. So now instead of having 32 threads I only have 16 threads. When i went back to try the same simulation again this time the 16 threads was only taking 24secs to finish. and the 8 threads was taking 35secs to finish. This made a lot more sence to me.
    Anyway so once I realized that turning off Hyper Threading fixed my simulation problem maybe it might be the cause of my slow performance in AE using multi processing. I tried AE and now multi processing is working great very fast now and stable. MP renders start right away now instead of getting stuck on frame 2 or saying initializing background processes and never ever doing anything. Before I had to keep disabling MP and re-enabling it in AE to get it to start working again and still it wasen't very stable
    If anybody is having issues with slow performance from their Multi processor systems try disabling Hyper Threading in the BIOS it might just fix your problem.
    Hope this helps 

  • Hard drive noise and system performance.

    Just like normal, my hard-drive makes noises (normal clicking, etc). When I'm doing something though, like typing, the system slows down for just a split second once a noise it made, stops registering my letters and then types all the letters that weren't regestered. (Keep in mind, this is over a one second period).
    For another example, when I launch dashboard, the widgets will start to appear on screen, stop for a (not even a) second, then the widgets will fall into place like they should. I have run disk utility multiple times, and each time it says that the HD is fine.
    Is this behavior normal? I can live with it, it's just kind of annoying.

    lol, I was going to add "as long as it's not doing that all the time" ...but was hoping for the quick fix. You might want to check your Activity Monitor and see which program or background process is causing the activity ...have you installed anything lately that coincided with this problem? You also might want to try booting into Safe Mode to see if things still persist.

  • Trash and System Performance

    Need to know for company SOP reasons whether or not keeping thousands of files in the trash for weeks affects mac performance in any way. I always remember from OS 7 and up that you wanted to keep the trash relatively clean for best finder performance. I remember also having issues running maintenance on mac's with a large number of trash files that were not yet deleted. Are there any links that you can provide on the this subject. Thanks in advance.
    ~b

    *"Need to know for company SOP reasons whether or not keeping thousands of files in the trash for weeks affects mac performance in any way."*
    Unless the hard drive is almost full, the amount of files stored on it, whether they are in the trash or not, does not affect performance.

  • SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SLOWER THAN EXPECTED

    The system performance is poor. Any tips?  Should I schedule a genius bar appointment?

    The system performance is poor.
    In what way?  Need details.  Please detail ALL you have done so far in the way of troubleshooting?   Need this info to avoid the been there done that scenarios.
    Any tips?
    Not until you provide details.
    Should I schedule a genius bar appointment?
    Not until we find out if it's necessary.
    OS X (10.6)
    Use Software Update or the OS 10.6.8 combo update to update your OS.  Also, update everything SU has to offer for your computer.  When done, repair permissions and restart your computer.

  • I tried to publish my project of 2 html pages, 3 photo pages and one widget page (map) to ipage hosting site. the two html pages published and that's all. Help.

    I tried to publish my project of 2 html pages, 3 photo pages and one widget page (map) to ipage hosting site. the two html pages published and that's all. Help.

    What's the URL of your site so we can examine it first hand?   Also try publishing the site to a folder on your hard drive and use the free FTP client  Cyberduck to upload your site.  It's been known to work when iWeb's ftp client has failed.
    OT

  • To add meta tags, you open your published .html pages with TextEdit or any other text editor and modify as required. You have to do redo it each time you republish. Ihow do I do this? I need step by step instructions

    To add meta tags, you open your published .html pages with TextEdit or any other text editor and modify as required. You have to do redo it each time you republish. I need step by step instructions on how to accomplish this  please .

    Rage Sitemap Automator and iWeb SEO Tool are two different applications.
    Use SEO Tool to add the title tag and meta description. These need to be added to the html file for every page of your website. SEO Tool stores all these so that when you republish you only need to add tags to any new pages and click the re-apply button to refresh the existing ones.
    Once you have added. refreshe the tags with iWeb SEO Tool and uploaded the files with your FTP application, then open the site in Sitemap Automator and create and upload a new sitemap.
    Once you have set up accounts with Google, Yahoo and Bing, verified your site with each and submitted a sitemap, on subsequent publishing Sitemap Automator will resubmit the sitemap with one button click. It will also notify Ask.com whch doesn't require an account since you can add your domain name to this URL to ping them...
    http://submissions.ask.com/ping?sitemap=http%3A//www.domain.com/sitemap.xml

  • Flash's published HTML (+js) won't work in Safari?

    I have created a Flash file that consists of nothing but an FLVPlayback control that loads a .flv file. I then use the default publish settings to publish the .swf. The resulting HTML file opens, displays properly, and plays the movie in IE7, FF3.0, and Chrome 2.0. However, when I open it in Safari 3.0.4, I see nothing; just a blank page. Safari has FP10 installed and has no problems displaying Flash content on any other web sites, e.g. iTunes, Apple. Adobe, or YouTube). I don't have IE8 to test on (I installed it and it hosed my whole system, so it's been eradicated).
    I am loading the file locally from the file system; I want to make sure it works before I publish it. I don't know if that has anything to do with it or not, but I don't see how it could. The AC_RunActiveContent.js script is present and getting loaded (I wish I were right now ).
    Has anyone else experienced this or know what the problem might be? I am including the entirety of the HTML content it generated here for reference (I have changed the tag brackets to braces just so it will post here).
    [!-- saved from url=(0013)about:internet --]
    [html lang="en"]
    [head]
    [meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" /]
    [title]IntroToCOL[/title]
    [script language="javascript"] AC_FL_RunContent = 0; [/script]
    [script language="javascript"] DetectFlashVer = 0; [/script]
    [script src="AC_RunActiveContent.js" language="javascript"][/script]
    [script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript"]
    // Globals
    // Major version of Flash required
    var requiredMajorVersion = 9;
    // Minor version of Flash required
    var requiredMinorVersion = 0;
    // Revision of Flash required
    var requiredRevision = 115;
    [/script]
    [/head]
    [body bgcolor="#ffffff"]
    [!--url's used in the movie--]
    [!--text used in the movie--]
    [script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript"]
    if (AC_FL_RunContent == 0 || DetectFlashVer == 0) {
    alert("This page requires AC_RunActiveContent.js.");
    } else {
    var hasRightVersion = DetectFlashVer(requiredMajorVersion, requiredMinorVersion, requiredRevision);
    if(hasRightVersion) {  // if we've detected an acceptable version
      // embed the flash movie
      AC_FL_RunContent(
       'codebase', 'http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,115,0',
       'width', '550',
       'height', '400',
       'src', 'IntroToCOL',
       'quality', 'best',
       'pluginspage', 'http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer',
       'align', 'middle',
       'play', 'true',
       'loop', 'true',
       'scale', 'showall',
       'wmode', 'window',
       'devicefont', 'false',
       'id', 'IntroToCOL',
       'bgcolor', '#ffffff',
       'name', 'IntroToCOL',
       'menu', 'true',
       'allowScriptAccess','sameDomain',
       'allowFullScreen','false',
       'movie', 'IntroToCOL',
       'salign', ''
       ); //end AC code
    } else {  // flash is too old or we can't detect the plugin
      var alternateContent = 'Alternate HTML content should be placed here.'
       + 'This content requires the Adobe Flash Player.'
       + '[a href=http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflash/]Get Flash[/a]';
      document.write(alternateContent);  // insert non-flash content
    [/script]
    [noscript]
    // Provide alternate content for browsers that do not support scripting
    // or for those that have scripting disabled.
       Alternate HTML content should be placed here. This content requires the Adobe Flash Player.
       [a href="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflash/"]Get Flash[/a]
    [/noscript]
    [/body]
    [/html]

    Yes, that would be helpful, I know. However, the file isn't being hosted anywhere. It will be e-mailed, I guess, as an e-vite. I just created the Flash file and published swf & html plus a jpeg as a still. Then I sent that to the marketing person...who knows less about this than I do. But for some reason, when she opens the file up in her IE browser, she is getting an older revision of the e-vite that isn't playing correctly. I suspected that she possibly only referenced the new html file and it sourced the old swf file. So when she played it in the browser, she saw the old swf file play. I've asked her to make sure she deletes any old copies and just uses the new html and swf files. Does that sound like a possible solution? I haven't heard back from her yet to see if that solved the issue.

  • PDF or HTML for mobile Technical Documentation and Newsletters

    Hi,
    I've been reviewing the pros and cons for PDF and HTML for mobile technical documentation and newsletters and wanted to get your honest thoughts on this.
    Here's the scenario:
    I need to create  mobile technical documenation and newsletters that are interactive, i.e. video, commenting/annotating, links, forms, etc.
    Given how the mobile publishing market is rapidly evolving, what is the most practical format, (with minimum format issues) to use for both short term and long term?  PDF or HTML?  Why?
    Based on your choice, which format would you use for non-interactive documents that offers the most creative options and usability?  Why?
    Paul

    Hyper Text Markup Language ( HTML ) is going to work better.  Mainly because the way mobile is setup, the interface has to conform to the device and with the other elements coded into the interface, HTML is far better.  You keep referring to usability, so even in non-interactive scenarios in mobile documentation, you're better off using HTML.

  • I have an iMac running Lion and W7 with boot camp . It has been operating flawlessly until I went to reboot into Mac tonight. Screen went black, and system is unresponsive. I've tried force quitting and turning power off. Hard drive starts but that's it..

    I have a 5 month old  iMac running Lion and W7 with the latest version of boot camp . It has been operating flawlessly until I went to reboot into Mac tonight. Screen went black, and system is unresponsive. I've tried force quitting and turning power off. Hard drive starts, there's a small amount of drive activity and that's it. 

    Hi Jane, your info may still be there, look in the Users folder at root of the drive, how many users are there there?
    It sounds like this may have happened...
    Return to default desktop, apparent "loss" of home directory, (it can happen spontaneously too)...
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=107854

  • IView and system admin objects appear changed or not registered when transported

    Hi,
    Recently we moved a few objects - iViews, pages and roles as epa and system admin objects as config archive and imported them manually to Test system. But when checked in the next landscape, the iView properties appear different. Eg. In Development system, the iView was unchecked for visibility option i.e. iView should not be visible. But when transported to test system, the property was checked and gave error. On reimporting, the same thing happened and we had to manually correct the property. This is not an expected behaviour and manual changes are not to happen after development changes.
    Similarly, though config archive import showed the 2 new system objects in the respective location of Test system, the expected functionality was not working. I checked this by deleting one of them and manually creating the same entry and it worked fine. So I also had to delete the 2nd one and create a manual entry. The system admin objects we used pertained to System Configuration  --> Content Mgmt--> Form Based Publishing --> Forms Availablity --> Folder Settings
    We also moved kmcs and they are reflecting properly with correct folder permissions.
    We don't understand why this is so occurring (iView and system admin entry appearing different or not getting registered )and never experienced such a case in previous projects. We don't want to face the issue going forward when transporting changes to staging and Prod systems.
    Please assist as to what went wrong or any probable cause and solution for same.
    Thanks,
    Janani

    Hi,
    Has anyone faced such a situation before and know the reason for same ?
    Regards,
    Janani

Maybe you are looking for