Publish values not posted

Hi
Can anyone tell me, what is the usage of "publish values not posted" tick?
regards
SP

closing the thread

Similar Messages

Values not Posting in ARE3 Document

Dear All,
I am taking a print of my ARE3 Document which is created for Deemed Exports,in this document My values for excise,secondary cess and higher secondary cess are not appearing,only the % that is 14%,2% and 1% is appearing.
Since we are capturing the ARE 3 invoice with reference to the excise invoice at the time of excise utilization when I click on Export and Deemed all the basic 3 Taxes that is Excise Duty Seconday Cess and Higher Secondary Cess are becoming zero which is correct.
Hence will this values appear in the ARE3 Document if yes then what are the settings we need to maintain and if no then please confirm the same.
Best Regards
Atul Keshav

Dear Atul,
in Deemed export after doing commercial invoice - capture the excise details in j1iin and click whether you are doing are3 with Licence. the values has to be there it must not be zero. After that you have to capture ARE3 in j1ia301.
if the value is not flowing in j1iin then your customizing has some problem ie in TAX on goods movement the basic setting - determination on excise duty you must have not maintained the default conditions for excise in your TAXINN or TAXINJ procedure,
Try this and let us know
regards,,
Sudhir

WIP values not posted to FI

Dear Gurues,
I am facing problem while calculating WIP.
System is showing the WIP calculated and it get reversed also after TECO and final settlement of production order but there is no impect on FI Side.
Pls suggest
Regards,
Rupesh

Hi
      First step:Please check the configuration of RA Version de-activate(Switch-Off) the radio button to transfer to financial accounting.
      Second step:Then Define posting rules for settling Work-In-Progress and save it.
      Third step: Go to configuration of RA Version and activate(Switch On) the radio button to transfer to financial accounting and also version relevant to settlement and also check the other setting in extended control.
       Transaction KKAX doesn't post anything in G/L accounts. It just calculates WIP. You have to run transaction KO88 (order settlement) to post WIP and deviations.
       Hope the above points might give you some light to your issue.
Regards
Edited by: Dublin on Oct 9, 2009 12:04 PM

Hierarchies - Showing not posted values.

Hi,
I've a query, I'm using InfoObject 0GL_ACCOUNT and a hierarchy for displaying it.
For some accounts, no values have been ever posted, but I wan't this accounts tho show when you expand the hierarchy.
Now when you expand the hierarchy only the accounts that have posted values are showing.
Is this possible ?
I'm using BW 3.5 SP15
Thanks in Advance,
Miguel P.

Hi,
As Jaya mentioned you need a Multiprovider on 0GL_ACCOUNT characterstic and Base Cube.
Take a look on the standard query 0IC_MC01_Q0001 which is bulit on Multi provider 0IC_MC01 in the query designer .Here the important Thing is The column caleed "All Mterias" ,which makes all the materials to be displayed in the report.
Similarly you need to take a KF which is only available in 0GL_ACCOUNT as an attribute. And restrct it with Info provider = 0GL_ACCOUNT. And take Tick mark(by right click on this column) for Constant selection and tick mark for "Display values not posted".
Foe more general info:
Re: "Dead stock" report
Re: Multiprovider(infocube + info object)
Re: How to display Fat/Medium/Slow moving materials in Query
Re: Inventory
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P
Message was edited by:
Anil Kumar Sharma

Altering the net value and not posting to Accounting

Dears SD pricing experts.
how can I make a condition type alters the net value of a sales order and not posting it to Pricing procedure (Without ticking the statistical tick mark in Pricing procedure since it is not updating the net value for the sales order).
best regards
Moahmmed

Dear Mohammed
I am unable to understand your comment "not posting it to Pricing procedure". Probably, it should have been "not posting it to Accounting".
If this is what your requirement is, either you can select "Statistical" as you yourself had indicated, or don't assign any account key in pricing procedure, so that the said condition wont hit any G/L account.
Last but not least, it would have been more appropriate had you briefed your requirement / process clearly instead of posting such a question.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Depreciation value not shown under the tab 'posted value' in AW01N

Dear experts
I have in chart of depreciation US GAAP book(posted to G/L), local GAAP book(not posted), book to post difference of two GAAP(posted to G/L), and local tax book.
In AW01N, the ordinary depreciation value is shown correctly for all books in the first tab 'planned values',
But on the second tab 'posted values', depreciation value only shown for the US GAAP book.
I'm thinking it maybe relavant with posting to G/L or not, that means only book with posting to G/L is shown with deprecation value on the second tab.
But something strange is in another chart of deprecation, deprecation value is shown for US book, local book.
Could someone comment how to control deprecation value shown or not on the second tab by local book?
Best Regards,
Nicole

Hi,
If you would have mentioned it as a "area post in real time" it will show you in the aw01n. If not, it will not show. Because, the tab specifies the posted values which means how much depreciation posted to GL.
As you have put "area doesnot post" for the local book, it will not show the balance.
Thanks,
sravankumar

AFAR test run showing the values but not posting in Real run.

Hi Friends,
i have an issue with AFAR recalculating the depreclation. The details are as below;
1. Asset value date is 15.07.2010. but ordinary dep. start date was set as 01.01.2010 manually by the user.
2. The Period control method 11, the dep. is calculated for entire year for acquisition.
3. we have already calculated depreciation from period 12 2010 to period 04, 2011.
4. Now, we have changed ordinary depreciation start date for 5 asset records from 01.01.2010 to 15.07.2010.
5. Therefore, we recalculated AFAR for these assets for 2010 and test run is showing the values for these 5 asset. The same was expected by the business.
6. When we execute the real run, it is not posting and no change in asset explorer for period 12, 2010 or in current period. No error message is available in spool / job log.
We have opened FI periods as well.
My question is that why the system calculating the values in test run and if it is calculated in test run, why it is not posting in update run?
As per the period control method, the depreciation should not recalculated for half year even we change the ordinary dep,start date from 1st Jan to 15th July.
I request you to clarify my doubt and help me to understand the error which is stoping the values in update run of AFAR.
Best Regards,
Padmaja

Hi,
Sorry...it is not worked out. Alternatively, i tried the shift factor with variable depreciation and i achieved the values which appeared in AFAR test run.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Padmaja
Edited by: PadmajaCH on May 19, 2011 3:26 PM

Tax condition value not getting posted with retroactive billing

Hi All
Due to price reduction from previous date, I am processing retro billing for billing documents. For target credit memo to be created, i have maintained the pricing procedure with condition type PDIF. Now when i create the credit memo with tcode VFRB, it only considers pr00 condition value for posting the difference with PDIF. Tax condition value is not being considered here.
Are there any other changes required to make in pricing procedure?
Please let me know the method to fix the same.
Thanks
Deepak Mehmi

Hello
For this I can think of one solution, where
1. you have to create a new pricing pricing for retroactive billing.
2. in that pricing procedure don't assign any account key to base price condition type, where as maintain a revenue account key for PDIF condition type.
3. calculated tax condition types based on PDIF instead of base price condition type, do have relevant account keys for account determination of those tax condition types.
I hope this can assist you.
Thanks & Regards
JP

GR value not 0 though the GR quantity is 0 in PO history

Hi,
We have an issue with a PO in which, the finance team has wrongly created invoice. After creation of IR, GR was done. But the person who has done GR didn't know that the IR value was wrong, by the time FI team told that IR value is wrong, GR has already been done. Later we had reversed the GR, by doing which GR quantity was 0 but GR value still exists in PO history.
Please help how to make this value 0.
Thanks and Regards,
D. Krishna Bharadwaj.

Moderator message:
please do not ask for sending OSS notes. There is a particular reason that you can only get it with a registered user. Hence publishing them is copyright infringement. so do not ask others to break the rules.
Ask your basis team to grand you access, or have them or any other colleague download the note for you
Do not post your email address in public forums in general, robot programs are looking for such info and use it to distribute spam mails. It is for your own safety, if you want your email address be visible, then make the settings in your user profile.
regards
Jürgen L
Moderator

Open order value not cleared Message: ORB 015

Hi All,
I have checked and searched for solution before poting this discussion, but not found anything relelvant to my problem.
While closing Project in CJ20N, I am getting an error message as -
Open order value not cleared
Message: ORB 015
It seems issue with incoming orders (sales orders), so I have run CJA1, and in output it is showing Processed object count as 1 but no detail log available for this.
Also in Settlement nothing is appearing to settle.
One thing I observed that one of the sales order linked with Project is rejected.
Can somebody assist me in resolving this issue?
Thank You,
Swapnil Kharul

Hi Swapnil,
There are 2 things you can check here..
1) Is this the first time you are trying to settle incoming orders for the said Project/WBS? I mean did you ever run CJA1/CJA2 and CJ88 post that for this project? You can check this in KE24 report. Check if you find any entries for record type I. If there are any it means settlement of incoming orders is being done.
2) For the said WBS hit Ctrl+F3 and check if there is a settlement rule maintained for Incoming Orders. On the settlement rule screen you will see a button "Incoming Orders". Click on that see if a rule is maintained.
Regards,
Gokul

Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)

Dear Expert,
I find the Maintenance Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)?Also, the settlement cost element is primary element define in GL chart of account.
When an maintenance order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the work order value posted cost center and the value is display in cost center report but not post to GL module in FI.As I notice only good issue or receive to/from work order is posted in GL but not the settlement of work order.Why?
Between, Kindly advise what are the report or T-code to view the maintenance order is done the settlement and what are the value is settle for maintenance work order?
Kindly advice under what circumstance when maintenance work order to cost center settlement is posted to GL(FI module)?
Please advice.
Thank you.
KH

Hi Kiran,
The error message clearly says that "Cost Center validity starts from 01.10.2014" i.e. in the future period.
Change the cost center from period in the past date and try.
BR, Srinivas Salpala

Stock Value on Posting Date

Hi SAPians,
I can get Stock Quantity on Posting Date from report MB5B.
Is there any Report which can give me Stock Value on Posting Date?
I have searched a lot but yet not found it.
Please help in this regard.
regards,
Jignesh

Thanks a lot friends for your answers.
i have execute report and analyzed it but i have one query.
If i am executing report for 31.03.2008.
The shown material Stock Value on 31.03.2008 is on the basis of MAP at 31.03.2008 or on the basis of MAP at Current Date.?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jignesh

MIRO gets posted and Part II is not posted

Dear Friends,
MIRO gets posted even if PART is not posted for excise material which create problem.
How to stop this.
Regards,
Pravin Joshi

hai,
Std SAP will copy values from PO history to MIRO screen.if you want change you can change as per your GR value.otherwise post it and do subsquent debit /credit .

Excise duty for some line item of material document is not posted

Dear CIN Exerts,
In my Scenario user is Posting Excise invoice for every GR (105) by J1IEX to generate Excise invoice.
In some Past cases, if there are more then one line item in a GR then Excise value for some material is not showing (May be that time user not Did J1ID (Excise rate maintenance ).
Now the problem is that we wants to post excise Duty for those material WRT material document for whom it was not posted.
Please let me know that how can we do so (excise posting against Material document) so that it get reflected (for those line items for which Excise deuty is not posted) in MIGO > Document Display> Excise items tab .
Regards,
Ashutosh

Excise posting is not recommended by sap for movements 103 or 105.
Refer or search for SAP notes with subject CIN Limited functionalities.

Fixed asset Write up Error. ABZU(Parallel depreciation area 32 is not poste

Hi Sap Gurus,
      I am running into an error when trying to post a write up via "ABZU". Here is the error message "Parallel depreciation area 32 is not posted". Message no. AA565.
Diagnosis
The asset to be posted does not manage parallel depreciation area 32, or transaction type that you are using is limited to certain depreciation areas, and does not contain depreciation area 32. This is incorrect.
System Response
Posting is rejected.
Procedure
Check the asset and the transaction type.
I tried "Limit Transaction Types to Depreciation Areas" in t-code:OAXE for derpeciation area 01 and 32 but still i am getting the same error. I am using ttype:700. When i look into derpeciation tab in asset master record i have depreciation area 32 is there. Is there any configuration piece i am missing. We are using area 32 as IFRS in group which is copy of 01.
Any help will be appreciate.
Thanks and Regards,
Babu

Hi,
There are the following reasons:
1) The wrong transaction type is being used. Please verify that you are using transaction type in the 700 series for your write-up.
2) The transaction type is restricted to certain depreciation areas.   In transaction OAXE the transaction type can be restricted to post only to certain areas. If the asset manages a parallel area you have to extend the posting to include the parallel area.
3) The asset was created before you introduced parallel currencies and does not manage the parallel area. In this case, the parallel area must be created on the asset or the values need to be transferred to a new asset that manages the parallel area.
4) Transacion types 600 and 601 can only be used for assets that have a calculation key in their depreciation area that allows no automatic calculation (for example depr key MANU). The unplanned transaction types however can be used with assets that allow automatic calculation.
You also need to verify that there are entries in Table ANLB for the asset in question for the depreciation area.
5) Your company code uses parallel currencies (currency types 10-co.code currency, 50-Index based currency, 30-Group currency...for example). The assets created in this company code must have the depreciation areas for parallel currencies active. You can only do this in activating the depreciation areas with parallel currencies for all the asset classes used in this company code.
Check transaction OAYZ to make sure the areas are activated for all asset classes in the co.code. If not, you will need to       activate these areas and ensure the asset has all areas assigned.
regards Bernhard

Publish values not posted

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for