Purchase Order Carryforward Does Not Net to Zero

We are working in a year-end test client, copy of Production, in preparation for fiscal year end closing.
For purchase order carryforwards, we find a number of documents which do not net to zero in the sender year. This seems to occur most often for the case where a line item has split account assignments. In these cases, only one account assignment line is carried forward. The other account assignment lines are ignored.
This does not occur for all cases where we have split assignments. We have been unable to determine what is unique about the instances where the carryforward does not work properly.
Our system is R/3, 4.7, support stack 27.
Has anyone else encountered this problem? If so, can you give me any guidance as to how to address it?
Thank you.

Hello all. Since i didn't get any replies, I don't know if there is any interest in this. However, for future reference, in case any else encounters this issue and searches the forum, here is the answer which we found:
FMJ2 and FMJ3 process the carryforwards and reversals in blocks of 2000 lines. At the end of a block, the PO may be split up across blocks, with one or more assignment items processed in the first block, and the remaining items in the next block.
If you have selected "Block Documents" on the initial screen, when the first item is processed, it locks the PO. When the second block attempts to process the remaining items, there is an error that the PO is locked, and these items are not processed.
The developer is working on a correction to the code to handle this. In the meantime, there are two workarounds:
1) Uncheck "Block Documents"
or
2) After processing, use FMJ3 to reverse the carryforwards which received the error. Use FMJ2 to carry them forward again, in smaller groups which are not large enough to fill up a 2000 line block, and which therefore do not encounter the problem.

Similar Messages

  • Purchase Order 4500000 does not exist

    When I am creating Service PO from shipment I am getting the error
    "Purchase order 4500000001  does not exist
    What can be the reason??????????
    Regards.

    Dear All,
    At last the problem has been resolved.
    There was an userexit assigned to the no.range table where the new doc.type was hardcoded to bypass the logic for allotting a PO Number and the problem was resolved.
    Since the problem has been resolved I am closing the thread.
    THANKS EVERYBODY FOR YOUR VALUABLE INPUTS AND SUGGESTION.
    Regards.

  • Purchase Order Carryforward (FMJ2) Does Not Recognize Assignment Changes

    In our year end processing, we ran FMJ2 to do purchase order carryforward. We have about 15 documents which had erroneous carry forward amounts. In each of these documents, there was a change in account assignment in the sender fiscal year. Fields which had assignment changes included Fund, Commitment Item, and/or Funded Program.
    When FMJ2 did the carryforward, it appears to have ignored the assignment change, and ignored any subsequent activity applied to the new assignment.
    It brought forward only activity applied to the original assignment.
    Has anybody else enountered this? Can anybody tell me what may be causing this, and how to fix it?
    Thank you.
    Will assign points for solution.

    Hello Aoife,
    If you need to perform a carryforward with changes in FM Account Assignment, you should define a Derivation Strategy for reassignment on closing operations.
    So, what you could do here is to reverse the Carryforward using FMJ3, and then define this derivation strategy for reassignment and perform FMJ2 again.
    You don't specify which is the release you are working on, but nevertheless, please find more information in the SAP Library / Funds Management for SAP_APPL 470-EA-PS200:
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/f0/ca5716260211d28a430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm">Funds Management</a>
    and choose Chapter "Closing Operations-> Derivation Strategy for Reassignment with Closing Operations".
    I hope this helps.
    Kind regards,
    Mar

  • How to block post price conditions  in purchase order after doing MIGO

    I need to block post price conditions in the purchase order, after doing MIGO.
    The problem is that somtimes buyers people go to the purachse order with ME22N, even if MIGO has already been made for this purachse order. They change The amount of certain price conditions in some or all the posts of the purchase. when people of accounting receive the invoice, there are problems of price differences.
    i need help to do it
    Thank you in advance for your help

    The system will not allow to change the price once goods receipt takes place on that particular order.  It happens only when we reverse the reciepts and make the po open.  In such case the persons can change with ME22N.  Its simple that only authorised user to have this transaction code and other users should not have this transaction code authorization.

  • Purchase Order values are not reflecting in MIGO

    Dear Experts,
    I have changed standared Pricing Procedure from TAXINN to TAXINT because excise calculation was wrong. Now I have assinged new pricing procedure & reflecting in Purchase order & working as per requirement also.But when we are doing MIGO, excise values are not automatically coming in MIGO. So Is there any configuration or missing copy control because i have changed pricing procedure?
    Also I want to put a check, if purchase order value is not matching with vendor invoice value then stores person can't do the MIGO.
    Could any body guide me?
    Thanks
    Trupti

    Hi,                                                                               
    It is not like that you have to mandatory use the TAXINN rather it is recommended by SAP to use but if some business requirement doesnu2019t meet up with what is recommended that its business call to go TAXINJ from TAXINN, but right now we don't know at what circumstances they moved to TAXINJ but question is what are the settings missing while moving from TAXINN to TAXINJ and because of that system is not picking the Tax Values at the time of MIGO in excise capture & posting.
    So I have several questions in mind in order to understand your system behaviour.
    1) Are you using the correct Tax code at PO level?
    2) If using the correct Tax code then is't correct value maintained in FTXP for the Tax code used in PO.
    3) If correct Value maintained in Tax code then by clicking on Taxes button mentioned under PO item level details are you able to see the correct value against each applicable condition type in next screen by clicking over Taxes button in PO?
    4) if not then first check J1id - Material Chapter Id combination, vendor excise indicator mentioned, correct duties maintained in excise duty so check all master data related to CIN maintained in J1id
    So first give answer to above mentioned questions then we procees further but I am sure I can make your system to picked  the correct duties don't worry Just answer my questions hope things become fine in your system.
    Best Regards,
    Silky
    Note: Please assign valuable points in order to encourage contributors to each answer to queries...

  • Purchase info record does not exists in purchase organization 1000

    Hi experts,
              I have created a new enterprise structure in SAP. when i am creating a PO its picking the correct info record, but when i am doing GR, its giving the error as 'purchase info record does not exists in purchase organization 1000". I have maintained everything perfect. the only thing i have changed is I have moved the open and close period from 11-2002 to 12-2008 in MMPV.
             Please give me some suggestions, where it can go wrong.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Poorna.

    Hi Guys,
              Thanks for all yours responses, Actually what deepak said was right, but in my IDES system i am not able to create new entries in assign plant to std purchase org. I found the database view for that, V_001W_E its for table T001W. So i looked into that table i found that std purchase org was given as 1000. i made direct entries in that table, i thought the reason for this may be due to , that i copied plant from 1000. After making entries , i did not got the error message that was i am previously getting.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ravi.

  • Purchase Order history is not updated with Invoice number

    Hello Experts ,
    Please suggest some inputs/solution for my problem.
    Scenarios is :
    PO --> SO --> Invoice
    I am creating the invoice with the medium EDI , when I click on Save button IDOC is generated with the message " IDoc 'xxxxxxxxxxxxx' was created and forwarded for transmission " and it showing the status as 03 i.e, The IDoc was sent to an R/3 System or an external program via a transactional RFC ...but the problem is if I got to the Purchase Order history Its not updated with the Invoice number.
    What could be the problem , please suggest.

    Hi!
    I'm not sure, in which process you link PO and SO. There are some different ways, which are totally different scenarios - if you need help here, describe more detailed.
    Your invoice is probably only created with reference to SO, so check the invoice itself. In this case also the SO history should include the invoice.
    Regards,
    Christian

  • HT1918 I have 2 Apple ID's, how do I delete the old one as its interferring with my new account and the music I have already purchased through ITunes does not want to play.  Any suggestions?

    I have 2 Apple ID's, how do I delete the old one as its interferring with my new account and the music I have already purchased through ITunes does not want to play.  Any suggestions?

    Why would you create a new account?
    All purchases will be tied to the account from which they were purchased.
    You will have to authorize your computer for all the accounts from which music is purchased.

  • Acct determination for Account-assigned purchase order with keys not define

    Hi,
    I'm trying to post an IDOC of type BBPIV through XI to an R/3 system.
    The posted idoc in R/3 is in status 51 (Application document not posted) with the error message "Acct determination for Account-assigned purchase order with keys not defined in chart of acts WP2P"
    As per my understanding this is something related to FI.
    Long text of the error is "The system cannot generate an automatic posting because there is no account determination defined for Account-assigned purchase order with keys   in chart of accounts WP2P.
    Correct the account determination for Account-assigned purchase order"
    Please help me how to solve this.
    Regards,
    Rashmi

    Hiya,
    This looks like its a MM posting / transaction.
    You need to go to OBYC and maintain the account assignment. If you provide the business scenario (GR into Stock, Subcontracting, etc.) for the process, I may be able to help.
    VKOA is for SD account assignment and I don't believe you can use that here.
    Cheers.

  • While executing TCode F13 and F13E, purchase order number is not appearing.how it should be displayed into tcode f.13, please any one help me

    While executing TCode F13 and F13E, purchase order number is not appearing.how it should be displayed into tcode f.13, what are the requirements need to display into tcode f.13, please any one help me, i am facing this problem in  production server

    Hi Nattu,
    Please check it will show the PO no under Purchasing doc field
    Check which layout you are applied.
    its should be
    SAP&F124
    Without Specification of Crcy
    Regd,
    Khan.

  • Need to create a sales order that does not create demand

    Hi,
    We need to create a no cost sales order - that does not create demand
    In our current set-up when we try to create a no cost sales order with a material ( It Cat = Norm) we see demand being created in MD04
    What configuration settings will allow us a deliverable order - that does not create demand (no MRP run?)
    Thanks,
    SM

    Hello,
    For this set of requirement i think the best option would be to configure a New Sales Order Type and a new Schedule Line Category. In VOV6, While you are defining a new Schedule line category in the transaction flow make sure to switch off the three check box.
    Transfer of requirements / Begin assembly order from SD
    Availability check for sales
    Product allocation active
    Then when we are assigning this newly defined Schedule line Category to Item category, make sure to leave the field of MRP Type as blank in VOV5.
    Regards,
    Sarthak

  • Unsuccessful Login Notification Does Not Reset To Zero

    Dear all,
    os: OUL5x64
    ebs R12 12.0.6
    db 10.2.0.4
    when users connect to the application and login with the wrong password
    On 12.0.6 in Production:
    When attempting to login the applications Find that Unsuccessful login notification always
    displays a cumulative count of unsuccessful logins every time. It does not reset to zero
    after you successfully login.
    Please advise how to fix this notification.
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    Please see (Note: 848921.1 - Unsuccessful Login Notification Does Not Reset To Zero).
    Regards,
    Hussein

  • Shutterfly order page does not open

    In PSE 11 in organizer I select a photo and hit order prints....then hit order shutterfly prints (I have acct) It shows preparing files but the Shutterfly order page does not open....just goes back to the selected photo.

    See if this thread helps:
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/5303973#5303973

  • Sales order stock does not exists

    Dear All:
    I have created a sales order with reference to a quotation. the line item in sales order is also with reference to the quotation. and the stock has been assigned to that quotation. But while creating delivery, it is giving the error that sales order stock does not exist. my query is why sales order stock is required when the article is with reference to a quotation?? should not the stock be with reference to quotation??

    Hi,
    Check the Item Category of the Sales order which your using to create the delivery.In the item category confuguration VOV7 the special stock indicator 'E' may be assigned.So without a sales order stock assignement it will not allow you to create a delivery.
    GO to Mb1b for the Sales order using 412 E create a stock and see whether the delivery is created or not.If it is creating than that means the sales order stock has to be generated through your process.
    If production order confirms then it may generate a sales order stock in MTO scenario.If in your case it has to generated then you have to use MB1B trnasactio code or create your own customized program to create the sales order stock.
    Regards,
    Saju.s

  • Sales order stock does not exist error during PGI

    dear sir,
    we have two plants 1010 and 1020,we are using variant configuration for our finished goods
    we want to make the sales orders in 1010 plant and we manufacture the machine in 1020 plant.
    so we want to dispatch machine from 1020 plant (shipping point),eventhough we make sale order in 1010 plant.
    but while doing PGI ,system shows one error message "Sales order stock does not exist" message 184,area M7.
    if we see in MMBE stock of finished good is available in 1020(made 412 E movement)
    how to resolve this
    thanks and regards
    srinivas pai

    There can be two reasons for these kind of error
    - Your sales doc while creating this order & your item category is marked with special stock indicator as E and after this order is created you have not reserved stocks in your plant against this order. This reservation can be done in tcode MB1B movement type 412 E.
    - Let say, if it is reserved then check the same in tcode MMBE stocks reserved for your sales order.
    Otherwise reservation you may have done properly with correct movement types with special stock indicator E. But while creating the your sales order with item category may not have been marked with special stock indicator E. In this case even though the system has stocks reserved for that order and that order when comes for PGI system doesn't sense.
    In either of the case, you have to again do the process.
    Hope it can assist you.
    Thanks & Regards
    JP

Maybe you are looking for

  • Server 2012 R2 Essentials Role: How to change the port numbers?

    Hi All, I've installed Server 2012 R2 on a Hyper-V guest, and then installed the Essentials Role on it. I've setup the role, and can access the dashboard. However the client I have has only one static IP - and Exchange/IIS running on the Hyper-V host

  • Process for purchase of exciseable raw mateial

    hi MM Expert, For my client there is one scenarioo, 1. they are making po for suppose 1000 rs 1 pcs qty. 2. based on this they do Goods receipt, and capture excise only for 800 rs as actual purchase price is 800. 3. by j1iex we post the excise for ca

  • Issue with geeksquad repair(s)

    I purchased a MacBook Air almost two years ago. Since then, it has been out for repair for 56 days (and counting). First, the hard drive crashed in 10/2013 (took one week to repair). Then, it was intermittantly overheating (03/2014), which GeekSquad

  • I have set up iMessages on my ipad but now I'm not receiving any messages on my iPhone how can I fix this.

    I have set up iMessages on my ipad in error now I'm not receiving any messages on my iphone, can anyone advise how to fix this or just undo everything I have done, don't necessarily need messages on my ipad

  • Select collection then delete several tables

    BEGIN ;WITH MyResult AS SELECT containerID AS barCode, dbo.fn_checkExpiration(containerID) AS containerExpired FROM [Barcode].[dbo].ContainerHistory WHERE dateEntered >= DATEADD(DAY, DATEDIFF(DAY, 0, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP) -1, 0) AND dateEntered < DATEAD