Purchase Order values are not reflecting in MIGO

Dear Experts,
I have changed standared Pricing Procedure from TAXINN to TAXINT because excise calculation was wrong. Now I have assinged new pricing procedure & reflecting in Purchase order & working as per requirement also.But when we are doing MIGO, excise values are not automatically coming in MIGO. So Is there any configuration or missing copy control because i have changed pricing procedure?
Also I want to put a check, if purchase order value is not matching with vendor invoice value then stores person can't do the MIGO.
Could any body guide me?
Thanks
Trupti

Hi,                                                                               
It is not like that you have to mandatory use the TAXINN rather it is recommended by SAP to use but if some business requirement doesnu2019t meet up with what is recommended that its business call to go TAXINJ from TAXINN, but right now we don't know at what circumstances they moved to TAXINJ but question is what are the settings missing while moving from TAXINN to TAXINJ and because of that system is not picking the Tax Values at the time of MIGO in excise capture & posting.
So I have several questions in mind in order to understand your system behaviour.
1) Are you using the correct Tax code at PO level?
2) If using the correct Tax code then is't correct value maintained in FTXP for the Tax code used in PO.
3) If correct Value maintained in Tax code then by clicking on Taxes button mentioned under PO item level details are you able to see the correct value against each applicable condition type in next screen by clicking over Taxes button in PO?
4) if not then first check J1id - Material Chapter Id combination, vendor excise indicator mentioned, correct duties maintained in excise duty so check all master data related to CIN maintained in J1id
So first give answer to above mentioned questions then we procees further but I am sure I can make your system to picked  the correct duties don't worry Just answer my questions hope things become fine in your system.
Best Regards,
Silky
Note: Please assign valuable points in order to encourage contributors to each answer to queries...

Similar Messages

  • Excise values are not flowing  in MIGO

    Dear All,
    I am facing a problem during MIGO.
    THERE IS STOCK TRANSFER BETWEEN 2 PLANTS AND 2 PLANTS ARE UNDER DIFFERENT COMPANY CODES.
    1 I have created a PO.
    2.Delivery through VL10D
    3.Picking-vl02n
    4.Created Bill-VF01
    5.Created Invoice and saved it
    When I am doing MIGO the excise values are not following.in migo SCREEN.I I want to know do i need to post EXCISE INVOICE and how to do the same.
    Pl let me know anything is missed out so that excise invoice is not flowing in MIGO screen.
    Regards
    Manash

    Hi,
    Have you miantained Tax code in STO ? if yes, then have you mainatained Settoff as 100% for that Tax Code in FV11 for which combination you are using
    SETOFF Must Be Maintained:-
    JMX1 --     IN: A/P BED setoff
    JEX1 ---      Ecess Setoff Sta
    HX1     IN: A/P SECess SOTot       
    If it is there please follow the Following steps for STO
    1.     Create Purchase Order(STO)  using ME21N
    2.     Create Outbound Delivery using VL10B
    3.     Create Billing Document using VF01
    4.     Create Excise Invoice using J1IIN
    5.                   GR with respect to Inbound delivery and in Excise Invoice give number of VF01.
    Hope Help U !
    Regards,
    Pardeep Malik

  • Updated (VORowImpl ) values are not reflected in inline POPUP table

    Hi Expert,
    Currently i am getting exception when i try to update my iterator binding,
    Here is my use case,
    I have view object displayed inside the inline popup as a table. When i modify one of the cell i am firing the value change listener and it is called the ViewObjectRowImpl class method. Inside the method i do some computation (i am executing some DB query to get back some value). After the query execution i am updating the other columns data based on the changes.
    First i have PPR the table and check out the update values. Unfortunately the change values are not reflected.
    Then i used the following code
    DCIteratorBinding itrBinding = findIteratorBinding("EmployeeVO1Iterator");
    if (itrBinding != null) {
    itrBinding.executeQuery();
    itrBinding.refresh(DCIteratorBinding.RANGESIZE_UNLIMITED);
    Now i am getting the " JBO-25003: Object EmployeeMgmtAM of type ApplicationModule is not found."
    May i know what went wrong? Am i missing anything. May i know how can i refresh the UI table based on the updated VORowImpl. Looking forward hints.
    Thanks

    Thanks Frank, Actually i am accessing the client method as follows,
    DCIteratorBinding itrBinding = findIteratorBinding("EmployeeVO1Iterator");
    if (itrBinding != null) {
    EmployeeVORowImpl employeeVO = (EmployeeVORowImpl)itrBinding.getCurrentRow();
    empoyeeVO.methodName();
    May i know what is the different between accessing the method as shown above and access via the MethodBinding?
    How about access the attribute of the View object using the above approach? i.e empoyeeVO.getName() like ....
    Also i have configure the ADF looger to finest level and found the primary reason to "Applicaiton module not found" was some entity validation. But this not always happened. Same test case works fine and fails sometimes. I am clueless. Could you please throw some light.
    Thanks
    Edited by: user1022639 on Feb 7, 2012 5:24 PM

  • Purchasing requistion dates are not reflecting in R/3

    Hi All,
    material created in R/3,here purchase requistion generated in R/3 & APO.
    Then in APO,after Rescheduling in detailed scheduling planning board new purchase requistion delievery date is not
    reflecting in R/3.
    Kindly revert back ASAP.
    Regards,
    Venkat.
    Edited by: venkat1215 on Jul 23, 2010 11:05 AM
    Edited by: venkat1215 on Jul 23, 2010 11:30 AM

    Venkat,
    You didn't answer my question.
    As a general rule of thumb, APO is much fussier about changing and synchronizing orders that were created in R/3.  If you have a choice, you should always create purchase reqs in APO (although cross-creation is supported, and can be made to work nicely if you are diligent).
    When you change an order in APO, and then publish the change to R/3, it is possible that the settings in R/3 will cause an issue with 'booking' the change.  One way to test this is to manually make the same change, but directly in R/3.  There should be no warnings or errors.
    Another thing to look at are the Application logs on both sides (SLG1) for possible failures that may give a clue.  Restrict to date and time interval where you know the proper update did not take place.
    Rgds,
    DB49

  • In service purchase order, value are different in status tab and when doing service enrty sheet

    please check the value 170360    4080  both are different  why?

    Hi tekhnath,
    Well according to the screen that you posted, the status of a PO can be seen under the status tab in the header of the PO, the value that you see in the service entry sheet is the price of the ordered value, like wise if my net price is 200 and the quantity i am booking is 2 then the value field in the service entry sheet would show 4000. The pending quantity can be seen in the report me2n against the PO number.
    here in your figures 170360 is the remaining order value and 4080 is the value for which you have booked the service entry sheet for.
    Regards,
    Sagnik

  • Expected values are not reflecting in the BW

    Dear Experts,
    My Infocube or Report is not reflecting exact values as in source system. Can any one provide possible reasons.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Raj

    Hi Raj
    Can u expalain which report and cube ur looking for and what data u need to compare.
    if ur using R/3 as a source go to RSA3 and check the data what ur extractor is giving to BIW.
    Regards
    Shashi

  • Modified idoc values are not reflecting in the IDOC display (ie we02)

    Hello Team
    I wrote one inbound interface for posting GR by using the IDOC MBGMCR03. In the inbound FM, i wrote some code for retrieving some data and mapping to its relevant fields of the segments. It is working fine but when i see the idoc values in WE02/WE05, i am not able to see the values which i have added in the FM. so please suggest me how to get the values in the IDOC display.
    Regds
    Raj

    Hello Team
    Thanks for your replies. Let me put my question in this way to you.
    In the inbound FM (ie idoc_input_mbgmcr), i have fetched some values from SAP by using the values which came from PI to that IDOC through mapping. what ever the values i have fetched from SAP in inbound FM, i have mapped them to the relevent segments and finally the complete structure i have passed to BAPI, where it will post GR. All these things are working fine, idoc is also getting successfull.
    But when i go and see the successfull idoc values, it is not showing the values which i have mapped in inbound FM. Now i want those values in that Final idoc.
    So pls check and suggest.
    Regards
    Rj

  • Changes made in BOM are not reflected in Configurator.

    Hi all,
    When i update minimum and maximum quantities in BOM, the new values are not reflected in the configurator.
    I have found a patch (patch# 4410573) for this issue in metalink and applying that patch did not resolve the issue.
    I have logged an SR with Oracle for this and Oracle support have asked me to run "Refresh Single Configuration Model" concurrent program and see if the changes are reflected.
    This program has 2 parameters one for folder and the other for Configuration Model Id.
    When i try to run the program, for any of the folders, the value set for the parameter Configuration Model Id does not show any values and hence i am unable to run the program.
    We don't have a separate instance for COnfigurator.
    Do i need to do any set up so that my Configuration model is reflected in the LOV?
    Can anyone please help me on this?
    Oracle Apps version: 11.5.10.2
    Configuration software build: 11.5.10.25.43A
    Regards,
    Sreekanth

    Hi Jason,
    Please see my comments below
    Jason said*
    Support is correct. If you haven't run the Refresh a Single Configuration Model concurrent program for your model, then the new BOM attributes will not be visible in your model. Changes to items/BOMs are not directly reflected in the configuration model. You must "refresh" the model to see the changes.*
    Even without running the "Refresh a Single Configuration Model" concurrent program, in some scenarios, changes are being reflected in Configurator.
    Ex:
    When i change only minimum and maximum quantities, the changes i.e. new minimum and maximum values are not reflected in Configurator.
    But, when i also change any of the following fields along with minimum and maximum quantities, new values are being updated in Configurator with out running the refresh program.
    effectivity_date, disable_date, component_quantity, planning_factor, component_yield_factor and optional class
    Can you please explain this?
    Also, i have already tried executing the query by commenting the enclosing_folder check. But still, the query is not retrieving any records.
    Basically, the sub-query that fetches devl_project_id itself is not retrieving any records.
    Jason said:+
    Based on the SQL above, the only criteria for importing a model is that the item under the folder must be:+
    a. A Model (PRJ = Project)+
    b. The Model cannot be deleted (Deleted_flag must be '0')+
    c. And the model must have been imported from Oracle apps, e.g. it cannot be a non-BOM model (orig_sys_ref is not null)+
    Can you please tell how can i check whether model is imported into configurator or not and if it is imported from where is it imported?
    Regards,
    Sreekanth
    Edited by: Sreekanth Munagala on May 12, 2011 8:52 AM

  • Station Globals modified externally are not reflected

    Hi,
    I am having an UI developed in CVI(EXE1) which runs a teststand sequence. The flow of sequence is controlled by Station Globals.
    The Station Globals i am trying to control from another user interface so that the flow in EXE1 will be exrcised. But some reason the updated station globals are not reflected in EXE1.
    In the sequence i have used Engine.ReloadGloabls() but some reason the values are not reflected.
    Anyone can help me out on this.

    Hey ramjeev,
    Are you certain that the globals are being saved from the location you edited them before you call the Engine.ReloadGlobals()? Also, as mentioned in the function help here, you should clear or destroy your existing references to the globals before calling the ReloadGlobals() method. This is because any existing references will retain their values rather than being updated with the method call.
    However, I'm not sure if this is the best approach for your application. Typically, Station Globals are used for configuration settings, particularly those that need to persist between executions. Since you're wanting to control this test sequence from another user interface, I wonder if UIMessages or a synchronization object such as a queue or notifier would be better for this purpose. Have you explored any of these options?
    Daniel E.
    TestStand Product Support Engineer
    National Instruments

  • Return Purchase Orders- CESS ACCOUNT NOT GET Debited in MIGO

    Dear Expert,
    We are implementing Return PO procedure for Materials.
    Business scenario :
    Goods received from vendor during Material receipt Stock Account debited and GR/IR Clearing account Credited and Cess account Credited further during Invoice Posting Material Vendor is Credited with debiting GR/IR Clearing account and Cess Vendor is get Credited by debiting CESS account
    In Case of Return Purchase Order we are sending Materials back to Vendor during Goods Issue to Vendor Stock Account Credited and GR/IR Clearing account debited but Cess account get Credited insted of debited,
    Please advice what setting can be done to debit CESS Account during goods return
    Regards,

    Hi
    Thanks for reply, vendor has to pay duty to govt if vendor is not belong to factory location
    during GR for outside vendors pay duty to govt  but naw we want to return materials to vendor at this time we also want to recover duty paid to govt.
    to make this possible we have Created vendor code for Govt creditor and condition is created with feature of delivery cost
    goods are return to vendor by creating Return PO ( as no reference document available ) and goods issue with movment type 161.
    Pls advice

  • Service order values posted to WBS, values are not displaying in CJii3

    Hi,
    We have posted thevalues from service order to wbs.
    values are not displaying in cji3.
    Regards,

    Hi,
    If the data has been successfully loaded into BPC, then it should be visible in BPC report.
    You need to make sure that you are looking at the correct data region. Check in RSA1 and check which data region has the data. Maintain the same region in the report as well.
    Hope this helps.

  • BED,AED,& SED ARE NOT CAPTURING IN MIGO .

    Hello All.
                       During MIGO When i post the doc i get an warning msd that
    -- " BED, AED and SED for the excise item is zero
    Message no. 4F122 ".
    & other warning meg.is " Please check excise base for the item is zero !
    Message no. 4F121
    pl guide how to maintain this .
    thanks in advance
    sap11

    Hello,
    In my opinion you have not maintained the Excise details.
    Maintain
    Chapter ID
    Material & Chater ID Combination
    Assesable Value
    Cenvat Determination
    Vendor Excise Details ( Check the Excise Indicator) as 1
    because of not maintaining these Excise details, values are not caluclated in the Purchase Order.
    Due to this reason while doing Goods receipt, system is not getting the Excise Values.
    Please maintain and let me know.
    Regards,
    Kumar

  • Date Deviates from permissible range [Purchase Order - Value Date]

    hello all,
    i want to add a Purchase Order (Services) Posting date 05/07/2008 and Delivery Date is 09/30/2008, it prompts me the Error "Date Deviates from permissible range [Purchase Order - Value Date]", now this is my question.
    what is the date range for PO posting date and delivery date that the system will allow(date difference)? can i set this one?
    Note: we need to make an advance PO for this since our BP required this time period for them to accomplished.
    Please help.
    Thanks.
    FIDEL

    FIDEL,
    All documents have 3 dates DocDate, DocDueDate, TaxDate.  The date ranges for these dates are taken from the Active Posting period definition.
    Open Administration  > System Initialization  > General Settings > Posting Periods
    Click on the Yellow link arrow next to the current posting period and check the Due Date From and To Range and expand the To date to cover 09/30/2008
    Posting Date From
    Due Date From
    Document Date From
    Suda

  • "cheapest purchase order value"  in SOCO

    Dear helper,
    Where is this field "cheapest purchase order value" read from?. Steps:
    - At SOCO add any item to the workarea
    - Press "propose source of supply"
    - The vendor list has two price fields:
      "current purchase order value"
      "cheapest purchase order value"
    Where are these fields read from?
    Which table should be maintained?
    Thanks in advance for your help!
    Guillermo

    Hi
    I suppose (not sure) these fields are read from the table BBP_PDHGP (check for field TOTAL VALUE).
    Current Purchase order value will be the current SC value to be converted to PO, and the cheapest will be the relative value of the old PO's for that vendor(may be so).
    Regards
    Reddy

  • GR/IR A/c Amount and Amount in local Curreny values are not matching

    Hello Gurus
    When we are doing MIGO for some Scheduling Agreement PO's the Amount and Amount in local currency columns are mismatching with  paise (+/-), eventhough PO belongs to Local Currency (INR). Because of this GR/IR account is not cleared after MIRO through F.13. Both MIGO and MIRO amount are showing as Open items.
    Why it is happening and what is the way to clear GR/IR A/C. (F.13 with Tolerance limit is also not workout).
    Thanks & Regards
    Venkat.P

    Hi sridhar
    Thanks for reply
    Through MR11 also these values are not cleared.
    Regards
    Venkat.P

Maybe you are looking for