Purchase Order Integration Model Activation Error "Source Invalid"

Hi Experts,
When I try to activate Purchase Order CIF integration model for a specific plant, I am getting an error
"SOURCE_INVALID" r                                    XC           014
When I checked failed LUW, found one product which is Subcontracted.
These a Subcon PO exist at this plant and Vendor is Subcon Vendor.
Before IM activation, I have CIFed Subcon vendor and T-lane between Vendor to plant exists in APO.
Any idea how can I resolve this issue?
Thanks,
Vipul

Hi Vipul,
I hope you have created subcontracting purchasing info record and connected with the productuon version.
Secondly whether it is valid.
A purchasing info record of the category subcontracting which documents the subcontractor as the source of supply of the end product.
Regards
Datta

Similar Messages

  • CIF sales orders integration models

    Hi,
    The activation of the sales orders integration model is taken tvery long time, although there is just one plant.
    What would be a good recommendation to divide the integration models; would it work better filtering it
    by group of products? How many products aprox. would be a good number by integration model?
    Thanks a lot

    Hi ,
    Try using
    Parallelized Selection in SAP R/3 and Parallelized Processing of Several Queues in APO while activating the integartion model.
    Also check the settings defined in CFC3 for sales order.
    Thanks,
    nandha

  • Purchase order discount per row error

    Dear all,
    I have a client who gets the following error when trying to post an Purchase order:
    "[Discount % per row] [Line 3], You are not permitted to perform this action"
    The purchase order is a service order and no accounts have been selected. Also the discount field is not visible or active on the purchase order. The user is not authorized to add discounts but he has not done so in the first place. What could the problem be?
    Regards,
    Anthony Njagi

    Hai!
    Even if Discount field is not active in Row Level, for service Type Documents when i change Total value more than once that is calculating the difference to Discount.
    Example:
    First i entered Total as INR1000
    I found that is wrong and changed to INR1200
    The Difference between INR1000 and INR1200 will go to Discount.
    To avoid this, ask user to type the amount in Unit Price Column instead of Total Column.
    Regards,
    Thanga Raj.K

  • Integration model activation issue - After Prod to Quality refresh of R/3

    Hi Guys,
    Our R/3 quality system refreshed from production. Hence all the integration models Logical system pointing APO production system. Mistakenly I deactivated all the integration model in R/3 Q system which having APO Production logical system.
    All the IM in R/3 quality system are inactive. When try send material getting error message "relavent location doesn't exist".
    For that try to move the Location getting error message "Location already exist in APO Quality" system.
    Now I want to active the all the Plant, material.etc integration models. Please let me know if any more information and help to overcome the issue.
    Thanks,
    Saravanan V

    Saravanan
    Make a table level change and set the integration model flag as active in the table CIF_IMOD. This will help you solve the issue .
    Go to transaction SE16 . Give table name as CIF_IMOD. Give the name of you integration model and execute . Now all versions of that integration model will be displayed ( this will happen if you have many inactive versions and do not have the RIMODDEL program to delete inactive IM's) . Choose the latest version and go to change mode  and set the value of "Entry is active"  (technical name ACTIVE) field to  I.
    You can take help from development team if you do not have authorization to SE16
    Thanks
    Saradha

  • PPM Integration Model Activation did not send delta change data

    Hi all,
    I have an integration model of PPM's. I activated the PPM for the initial transfer.
    When I create a new prod. version, I created a new version of the model for PPM, above the previous active one.
    When I activated the new version of model, the system tried to send all data.
    I supposed that the system would only send the changed data, because the previous model is active.
    but the system sent all PPM's
    and it takes too long.
    Would you please answer why does the system react like that and what must we do?
    Mehmet

    Hi
    In order to check what is occuring, in your ERP system look at Table CIF_PPM_CHANGED, this will tell you the Material, Plant and Prod Vers of your PPM,s. It also has a field CHANGED to tell you if any changes have taken place and a field PROCESS, which should be set to "X" if the change has passed over to APO.
    Check the values in your table to see if this has been set. It should only send the delta records where there is a value in CHANGED and PROCESS=" ".
    Also check to ensure that people are not changing the Bills of Material or Routings etc, as this will also resend the PPM´s.
    Regards
    Ian

  • Purchase Order Crystal Report Layout Error

    The stock Crystal Report Layout for Purchase Orders is giving me the following error:
    A subscript must be between 1 and the size of the array.
    Details: errorKind
    Error in File POR20002 {b89f97ad-bf1f-447b-8bb4-b3d2e5219269}
    {3C375C81-7D37-475D-9BCB-1703CE533B65}.rpt
    Error in formula N_Decimal_Places:
    '// To get the length of decimals
    A subscript must be between 1 and the size of the array.
    Details: errorKind
    I looked in the Crystal Reports Formula fields and could not find N_Decimal_Places.
    Has any one else had the problem with the PO layout that comes with Business One?  If so, how did you fix it?

    Couldn't find how to copy the PO layout over using copy express.
    I did compare the RDOC fields for POR20002 in both databases and they are Identical. 
    In Crystal Reports, I did a formula search for N_Decimal_Places and it found nothing.  Then I did a search for 'length' in all formulas and it finds length in N_Decimal_Places.  When I double click on N_Decimal_Places it clears the screen and never shows the formula. This happens in both layouts for my test database and SBODemoUS.
    Again, SBODemoUS works correctly and AAA_TEST give the error.

  • Purchase Order Print Report Compilation Error

    Hi,
    While compiling the report in Reports Builder Purchase Order Print Report , we get the following error:
    identifier GET_PRECISION must be declared.
    Where as this is a seeded function inbuild in the Program Units.
    Also while compiling on server we get the error.
    Cannot convert rdf to rep.
    Thanks,
    Angelica.

    Couldn't find how to copy the PO layout over using copy express.
    I did compare the RDOC fields for POR20002 in both databases and they are Identical. 
    In Crystal Reports, I did a formula search for N_Decimal_Places and it found nothing.  Then I did a search for 'length' in all formulas and it finds length in N_Decimal_Places.  When I double click on N_Decimal_Places it clears the screen and never shows the formula. This happens in both layouts for my test database and SBODemoUS.
    Again, SBODemoUS works correctly and AAA_TEST give the error.

  • Novated Purchase orders cannot be changed error

    Hi Experts,
        while trying to edit the PO we are getting an error as " Novated Purchase orders cannot be changed" . I am confused that which field is used to differentiate the normal PO to that of novated PO at portal level.  Please let us know why this error occurs and how can we solve the issue ?
       Thanks in Advance.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Aishwarya.M

    Hello Aishwarya ,
    A Novation is agreement of parties usually done in conjunction with an assignment where upon the assignment there is now a new agreement between the original party whose contract was assigned and the party to whom the contract was assigned that in effect extinguishes (cancels) the old agreement and relieves the assigning party of liability under the contract. 
    For example if A and B have a contract and there is an assignment and novation of that contract by B to C, the contract would now be between A and C and B would no longer be liable to A under the contract as the “novation” extinguishes their liability.
    If you wanted to prevent a novation you might include something like the following:
    “This contract shall be binding on the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns. Except in the instance of an assignment or transfer by Buyer of all or any portion of this agreement, the assigning party shall remain liable for the performance of any assigned or transferred obligations hereunder.
    The requirements for a novation may vary by jurisdiction. For example in New York for there to be a novation it must specifically say it is a novation. In assignment consent letters Suppliers may try to create a novation by the words they use where the language in affect would say that Buyer may only look to the new entity going forward. Please check with the PO which supplier is being used and also check is there any third party involvement in that PO.
    Thanks
    Gaurav Gautam

  • Purchase order IDoc PORDCH generation error

    Hi all,
    I have made all the settings in the partner profiles to trigger PORDCH IDoc when I create or change purchase order through output message type.
    But the error it gives in WE05 is the following:
    The segment E1EDK01 does not occur at the current level of the basic type PORDCR01 (extension ).
    This error can have several reasons:
    The segment E1EDK01 is assigned to a group whose header segment does not occur.
    The segment E1EDK01 does not exist in the syntax description of the basic type PORDCR01 (extension ).
    The sequence of segments in the group in which the segment appears is incorrect.
    Previous errors ('mandatory' segment or group missing) may be due to this error.
    Since the generated IDoc is of ORDERS05 structure this is giving an error.
    Can anybody help me out with this.

    Jwalith
    It seems, you are using wrong Process Code/Inbound Function Module .... Create new process code or modify your Z-Process Code to link it to function module IDOC_INPUT_PORDCH, which is valid for Message Type PORDCH.
    This should solve the problem.
    Thanks
    Amol Lohade

  • Purchase order creation : internal pricing error

    Hi,
    While creating a purchase order, i am getting an error 'internal pricing error'. Message type : V1806
    This is basically for creating an Invoicing plan !
    Let me know in case of any clue.
    -Sachin D

    Hi
    is it this error
    Internal pricing error
    Message no. V1 806
    Diagnosis
    The program link between tables KOMT1 and XKOMV using the XKOMV-IX_KOMT1 field no longer works in the pricing program SAPLV61A. This could be because the PRICING_REFRESH function module has been called up from another function module, even though you did not require it.
    Procedure
    Inform SAP.

  • Prevention of assignment of Purchase Order to External activity from ME21N

    Hi,
    I would like to know if it is possible to prevent account-assigning a purchase order or requisition  to an external activity outside of PS, (CJ20N or CN22). The external activity will generate a purchase requisition when released from CJ20n or CN22.
    If someone goes outside of PS in ME51N or ME21N, they can also create a purcahse requisition or P.O. and assign it to that same network activity.
    Is there a way to prevent this from happening?

    In MM Customizing go to Purchasing=> Account Assignment Categories
    For Acc Assignment Assignment Category 'N' make the field 'Order' as display only.
    with regards,
    Ravi Shrivastav

  • Integration model activation

    Hi All
    Goal : To activate the Integration model
    Right now, we are working on quality systems (both ECC and APO). There is a Int.Model for masterdata from ECC to APO. The Integration model is not getting activated.
    Reason: In APO under /sapapo/cq we have these line items "Base unit of measure for product X cannot be changed' (several hundreds of materials).
    Looks like there is a mismatch of Units of measurement for the same product in ECC and APO. For now I am matching the Units of Measurements in both the systems, but its kind of cumbersome because there are several hundreds of materials in the queues.
    Also, suprisingly there are some products whose Units of measurements *match* and are still in the line items (queues)
    Is there any better way to address this and activate the Integration model?
    Thanks
    Pooja
    Edited by: Pooja Challa on Sep 29, 2009 9:03 PM

    Hi Pooja,
    It is not advisable to change the base unit of measure in R/3 for the materials which have been transferred to APO. But it may be necessary to change it in R/3. During that time SAP is kind enough to give the warning.
    I am not sure how many materials are there in R/3 whose unit of measure has changed. If it is possible to find out using some kind of change document report then it will be good input to next step.
    Next step would be to maintain new base unit of measure of the material in the R/3 system is created as an alternative unit of measure of the product in APO (transaction /SAPAPO/MAT1, 'Units of Measure' tab) so that the units can be converted in APO if necessary.
    Since you only change the base unit of measure in an R/3 system in exceptional cases, it is assumed that you will subsequently change the change material manually in APO.
    Thanks and Best Regards, Manoj
    PS: I would encourage you to have look at following notes:
    Note 832595 - Product: Base unit of measure cannot be changed using CIF
    Note 809596 - Product: Base unit of measure must not be changed

  • Purchase Order - Release Startegies; Inconsistency error

    Dear all,
    I am changing our release startegy for the purchase orders. Therfore I added two characteristics:
    - Plant (Table EKKO and Field WERKS)
    - Material Number
    The problem is that I get the following error message:
    "Inconsistent characteristic value assignment"
    I only added the plant value so I do not understand why I get an inconsistency?!
    In the next step I also want to integrate the characteristic "materialnumber". Is it possible to define the value somehting like all values without 950*?
    Can anybody help me with this?
    Thank you very much.
    Best regards,
    Markus Sigl

    Dear Sasi,
    I checked the database and all parts of the strategy. There should be no inconsitency (all the codes. I still could not solve this problem, groups and so on should be ok).
    Have you got another idea?
    Thank you very much.
    Best regards,
    Markus
    Hi
    I think this may be because of inconsistency caused with tables. Kindly check all the tables related to release strategy and the entries.tables T16FK, T16FV, T16FS, T16FC and T16FG
    If you change any release strategy with fout following the sequence, the inconsistency in table will be created.
    Follow the sequence below for deletion or changes
    1. Delete the release strategies
    2. Delete the release indicators
    3. Delete the release codes
    4. Delete the release group
    5. Delete the class
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Sasi

  • Transaction Code for Purchase Order with Network, Activity, and Element

    I have been asked for a transaction code that will allow the user to view the Purchase Order, Network, Activity, and Element on the same transaction.  I have been able to use CN41 to get them the Purchase Requisition, Network, Activity, and Element, but cannot seem to find one for the Purchase Order. 
    I feel like this should be easy...
    Any ideas?

    Hi,
    I would recommend you to test BAdI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST.
    Regards,
    Edit

  • Me2dp purchase order downpayment request amount error

    Dear All:
    I use the me2dp to monitoring the downpayment request of the purchase order.
    And  I finded a probelm
    I have create a downpayment request use me2dp, the amount is 200.
    The total of downpayment requests amoun is 200 if I run the me2dp report.
    Then I reverse the downpayment request use fb08.
    I thought the total of downpayment requests amoun should be 0.
    But the system show the total of downpayment requests amoun 400 in the me2dp report.
    Anyone help me?
    Thanks.

    Hello,
    The system adds the Down Payment Request and the Down Payment together in that report. The Down Payment Request does not get cleared until you actually run the Payment Program. That will clear the Request.
    Regards,
    Marc

Maybe you are looking for

  • Musik-player Problem iOS 5.1

    Hello, I have a problem. Since I upgraded to iOS 5.1 my iPod Touch 4th Gen  won´t play the music I have bought on iTunes. Please answer back fast if you know a solution for my problem because it really *****. Joey

  • Case Statement in sub query

    Hi, I have two issues, here is my initial code: select cc.name_id_no ,cc.discover_date ,cc.cla_case_no ,max(rl.year_of_incident)Non_Loss_Past_5 ,rl.timestamp from cla_case cc, rbn_loss rl where cc.name_id_no = rl.customer_no and rl.year_of_incident <

  • Using a string host variable in SQLJ

    Hi all, Im a newbie to SQLJ. I am trying to execute a simple select query in SQLJ in which the where clause takes a string value: So my SQLJ method is as follows: public ResultSet test(Connection connection,String s){ Ctx myConnCtx = new Ctx(connecti

  • Lost calendar events after sync

    after syncing my mac book air with my iphone 4 i lost all my past and future calendar events on my macbook and iphone. I have backups on time capsule: Q: how do i recover my approx 900 calendar events from time capsule into my calendar on macbook wit

  • Can we do oracle 11g software installation in parallel to SAP upgrade

    Hi Basis Expert, I need your inputs for one of this query The query is. Can we do oracle 11g software installation in parallel to SAP upgrade when the system is in Downtime phase. The idea is running SAP upgrade and in parallel running oracle 11g sof