[Q]IPinIP setup between Solaris 8 Systems

I'd like to communicate between the two systems by applying IPinIP.
For applying IPinIP, I have configured tunnel on two systems using ifconfig command as follows:
In System A,
#ifconfig ip.tun0 plumb
#ifconfig ip.tun0 211.217.97.67 211.217.97.132 tsrc 211.217.97.67 tdst 211.217.97.75 up
#ifconfig -a
ip.tun0: flags=10028d1<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST,UNNUMBERED,IPv4> mtu 1480 index 3
inet tunnel src 211.217.97.67 tunnel dst 211.217.97.75
inet 211.217.97.67 --> 211.217.97.132 netmask ffffff00
In system B,
#ifconfig ip.tun0 plumb
#ifconfig ip.tun0 211.217.97.75 211.217.97.132 tsrc 211.217.97.75 tdst 211.217.97.67 up
#ifconfig -a
ip.tun0: flags=10028d1<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST,UNNUMBERED,IPv4> m
tu 1480 index 3
inet tunnel src 211.217.97.75 tunnel dst 211.217.97.67
inet 211.217.97.75 --> 211.217.97.132 netmask ffffff00
Original packet that I have been testing is the ping(echo request) message.
That is packet sent from the system 211.217.97.43 to 211.217.97.132.
The result of that is described as follows:
=======
211.217.97.67 system received packet which 211.217.97.43 sent 211.217.97.132.
After appling IPinIP , 211.217.97.67 system sent that 211.217.97.75.
========
B system received packet applied IPinIP from 211.217.97.67 system.
But, 211.217.97.75 system did not forward packet to 211.217.97.132.
I could not confirmed that how 211.217.97.75 system does process that after receiving packet. What I did wrong?
I would like to know how 211.217.97.75 system does process received packet applied IPinIP.
I might expect that 211.217.97.75 system which configured tunnel forwards original packet to original destination address after IPinIP processing (decapsulation).
If you got some solutions for this problem of our system, let us know that.
And, ifconfig setting method for IPinIP setup between Solaris 8 Sytems?

agquint wrote:
What I mean was the post below your first one. But you correctly interpreted it in your next post. So "Solaris 8 containers" only works for SPARC. I don't get why Sun would only have containers support for SPARC systems. That is in total contradiction to why I would think they would develop containers in the first place: backwards compatibility to support programs that aren't yet migrated to the current version of Solaris regardless of whether they are x86 or SPARC. They have a solution but it only works at %50? hmph.There is probably just very little demand for it. During the Solaris8/Solaris9 days, Sun was killing off the x86 line. There is very little installed base of Solaris 8 x86 compared to Solaris 8 SPARC. (It wouldn't help you out, it appears, since you have SPARC binaries).
Darren

Similar Messages

Ecc 6.0 file system setup in solaries

Hi,
I want to install ecc 6.0 on solaries system.
Can any one provide file system setup before starting the installation. Like /usr/sap this kind of file setup.
It will help ful to our installation.
Regards,
Venkat

Hi,
I think you are not clear, you have not reade upgrade guide. Please reade upgrade guide so many other thing to be require in installation. All are depend on the your company requirement and how much data will grow per month etc.
Regards,
Anil

SSH Differences between Solaris 9 and Solaris 10

I use public key authentication when connecting via SSH but have noticed a difference between Solaris 9 and Solaris 10 and wondered if it's an environment setup issue. I keep my keys in $HOME/.ssh
When connecting from Solaris 9 I can provide an identity file without a path regardless of the directory that I'm in e.g.
ssh -i my_identity_file user@hostnameThe above works even if I'm not in the $HOME/.ssh directory. But when using the same from Solaris 10 I get the following error:
Warning: Identity file my_identity_file does not exist.If I run the command from $HOME/.ssh on Solaris 10 it connects fine, and if I pass in the path like so it works fine:
ssh -i $HOME/.ssh/my_identity_file user@hostnameIs there a setting specific to SSH somewhere as I can't see anything in my environment that's different between the two systems. There's certainly no entry in $PATH that points to $HOME/.ssh. How could I get SSH to work on Solaris 10 by just providing the identity file name and not the full path
Regards
Rich

It's not explicitly defined in /etc/ssh/ssh_config, so I'm assuming it would be using the default which is ~/.ssh/id_dsa.
But surely that's irrelevant if I'm using the -i switch to provide the identity file?
Remember the problem here is that I have to provide a full path to the identity file, whereas before just the filename would do.
Rich

OK to use fdisk/100% "SOLARIS System" partition for RAID6 Virtual Drive?

Solaris newb, here - I am configuring an x4270 with 16 135 GB drives. Basic approach is
D0, D1: RAID 1 (Boot volume, Solaris, Oracle Software)
D2-D13: RAID 6 (Oracle dB files)
D14, D15: global spares
After configuring the RAID's w/WebBIOS Utility, I am now trying to format/partition the RAID 6 Virtual Drive, which shows up as 1.327 TB 'Optimal' in the MegaRAID Storage Manager. After hunting around the ether for advice on how to do this, I came across http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/821-1459/disksxadd-50.html#disksxadd-54639
"Creating a Solaris fdisk Partition That Spans the Entire Drive"
which is painfully simple: after 'format', just do an 'fdisk' and accept the default 100% "SOLARIS System" partition. After doing this, partition>print and prtvtoc show this:
partition> print
Current partition table (original):
Total disk cylinders available: 59125 + 2 (reserved cylinders)
Part Tag Flag Cylinders Size Blocks
0 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
1 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
2 backup wu 0 - 59124 1.33TB (59125/0/0) 2849529375
3 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
4 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
5 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
6 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
7 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
8 boot wu 0 - 0 23.53MB (1/0/0) 48195
9 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
# prtvtoc /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s2
* /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s2 partition map
* Dimensions:
* 512 bytes/sector
* 189 sectors/track
* 255 tracks/cylinder
* 48195 sectors/cylinder
* 59127 cylinders
* 59125 accessible cylinders
* Flags:
* 1: unmountable
* 10: read-only
* Unallocated space:
* First Sector Last
* Sector Count Sector
* 48195 2849481180 2849529374
* First Sector Last
* Partition Tag Flags Sector Count Sector Mount Directory
2 5 01 0 2849529375 2849529374
8 1 01 0 48195 48194
My question: is there anything inherently wrong with this default partitioning? Database is for OLTP & fairly small (<200 GB), with about 140 GB being LOB images.
Thanks,
Barry

First off, RAID-5 or RAID-6 is fine for database performance unless you have some REALLY strict and REALLY astronomical performance requirements. Requirements that someone with lots of money is willing to pay to meet.
You're running a single small x86 box with only onboard storage.
So no, you're not operating in that type of environment.
Here's what I'd do, based upon a whole lot of experience with Solaris 10 and not so much with Solaris 11, and also assuming this box is going to be around for a good long time as an Oracle DB server:
1. Don't use SVM for your boot drives. Use the onboard RAID controller to make TWO 2-disk RAID-1 mirrors. Use these for TWO ZFS root pools. Why two? Because if you use live upgrade to patch the OS, you want to create a new boot environment in a separate ZFS pool. If you use live upgrade to create new boot environments in the same ZFS pool, you wind up with a ZFS clone/snapshot hell. If you use two separate root pools, each new boot environment is a pool-to-pool actual copy that gets patched, so there are no ZFS snapshot/clone dependencies between the boot environments. Those snapshot/clone dependencies can cause a lot of problems with full disk drives if you wind up with a string of boot environments, and at best they can be a complete pain in the buttocks to clean up - assuming live upgrade doesn't mess up the clones/snapshots so badly you CAN'T clean them up (yeah, it has been known to do just that...). You do your first install with a ZFS rpool, then create rpool2 on the other mirror. Each time you do an lucreate to create a new boot environment from the current boot environment, create the new boot environment in the rpool that ISN'T the one the current boot environment is located in. That makes for ZERO ZFS dependencies between boot environments (at least in Solaris 10. Although with separate rpools, I don't see how that could change....), and there's no software written that can screw up a dependency that doesn't exist.
2. Create a third RAID-1 mirror either with the onboard RAID controller or ZFS, Use those two drives for home directories. You do NOT want home directories located on an rpool within a live upgrade boot environment. If you put home directories inside a live upgrade boot environment, 1) that can be a LOT of data that gets copied, 2) if you have to revert back to an old boot environment because the latest OS patches broke something, you'll also revert every user's home directory back.
3. That leaves you 10 drives for a RAID-6 array for DB data. 8 data and two parity. Perfect. I'd use the onboard RAID controller if it supports RAID-6, otherwise I'd use ZFS and not bother with SVM.
This also assumes you'd be pretty prompt in replacing any failed disks as there are no global spares. If there would be significant time before you'd even know you had a failed disk (days or weeks), let alone getting them replaced, I'd rethink that. In that case, if there were space I'd probably put home directories in the 10-disk RAID-6 drive, using ZFS to limit how big that ZFS file system could get. Then use the two drives freed up for spares.
But if you're prompt in recognizing failed drives and getting them replaced, you probably don't need to do that. Although you might want to just for peace of mind if you do have the space in the RAID-6 pool.
And yes, using four total disks for two OS root ZFS pools seems like overkill. But you'll be happy when four years from now you've had no problems doing OS upgrades when necessary, with minimal downtime needed for patching, and with the ability to revert to a previous OS patch level with a simple "luactivate BENAME; init 6" command.
If you have two or more of these machines set up like that in a cluster with Oracle data on shared storage you could then do OS patching and upgrades with zero database downtime. Use lucreate to make new boot envs on each cluster member, update each new boot env, then do rolling "luactivate BENAME; init 6" reboots on each server, moving on to the next server after the previous one is back and fully operational after its reboot to a new boot environment.

Networking changes between Solaris 10 x86 10/08 (u6) and previous versions?

Solaris Community:
We have a J2SE CORBA-based application (that uses the default Sun ORB) that has run without problems on Solaris 8, 9, and 10 on both SPARC and, more recently, X86 platforms. Upgrading our client side machine (X4100 M2 Opteron platform) from Solaris 10 x86 5/08 (u5) to Solaris 10 x86 10/08 (u6) has resulted in threading or socket contention issues that we have not experienced previously. Using Live Upgrade, we can quickly go back to the u5 install on the client machine .... and the problems go away .... going back to u6, however, and the problems begin to show almost immediately. Our Java code base is identical as is the version of the JDK (1.5.0_16), so it would appear that there must be an underlying change to socket, networking, or threading behavior between these two versions of Solaris.
Thus far, I've not been unable to find details of changes either in the networking support or the threading model that might explain this .... or course, I don't have great expertise in these areas.
I've tried to use 'ndd /dev/tcp SOME_PARAMETER' for all of the /dev/tcp parameters returned by 'ndd /dev/tcp \?' to try to see if there are underlying changes in the /dev/tcp parameters .... but have not found any differences between Solaris 10 u5 and u6.
Can anyone point me to resources that would discuss changes between Solaris 10 u5 or u6 that might explain the problems that we've encountered? Or, alternatively, other system parameters that I could check that might explain changes in either TCP socket or threading behavior?
Thanks for your input,
John

I have a vague memory of someone reporting something similar which turned out to be due to a solaris feature called tcp_fusion.
To check whether thats your problem or not try the following.
Add following line in the /etc/system file.
set ip:do_tcp_fusion = 0
Once the /etc/system file is updated, it will be necessary to restart the system before the workaround will take effect.

Non-anonymous FTP setup on Solaris 8

I'd like to set up FTP access on my Solaris 8 (Sparc) box. However, I don't want people to use real system accounts on the server to log in. Is it possible?
For example, on Widnows platform, I can install WS_FTP Server from IPSwitch, which maintains its own list of FTP users (thus no users are set up at the OS level). Can the default FTP Server on Solaris 8 do such thing? What about WU FTPD?
Any helps are very much appreciated!

Thanks Jeffrey!
Can you also shed some lights on this:
The default FTP server setup on Solaris seems to allow a system user to go anywhere(if he has permissions to) once he ftps in. For example, once I ftp in as myself, I am in my home directory. I can cd to, say, /etc and do a get on the passwd file and read it on my local machine. Being able to read the passwd file does not do much harm, but just wondering if there is a way to restrict the valid system user to his home directory and its subdirectories once logged in.
Thanks again!

Installation of iCS 2.x on a Solaris system in which X or Open Windows software in not installed

When I try to run the install wizard for iPlanet Calendar Server 2.x on a
Solaris system that does not have X-Windows or Open Windows graphical user
interface, I get the following error:<BR>
<P>
Starting install wizard in graphical mode
ld.so.1: instsupp/bin/java: fatal: libX11.so.4: open failed: No such file or
directory
Killed
setup: The installation failed with errors.
<P>
To work around this problem, place a copy of libX11.so.4
into the /usr/lib
directory. This will allow
you to run the Calendar Server 2.x installer in the -nodisplay
mode. You can find the
libjava.so in the
instsupp/lib/sparc/native_threads
directory under the installation
program tree.

I thought that might be the case, so I preemptively expanded the mac partition to fill the entire disk, and retried -- it did not work. I think, at this point, my best bet might be to reinstall OSX from scratch, enable file-vault, and then repartition and install the other OS's.

Confirm Relation between Solaris 9 and SunOS 5.9

Hello,
I want to install ECC 6.0 on Oracle/Solaris.
For ECC 6.0 installation ,service.sap.com/pam mentions solaris version should be SOLARIS/SPARC 9 or SOLARIS/SPARC 10 .
On my Solaris Server, when I execute "uname -a" i get,
" SunOS 5.9 Sun4u Spac .. ".
I found following information about relation between Solaris and SunOs release,
Solaris 10 --> SunOS 5.10
Solaris 9 --> SunOS 5.9
Solaris 8 --> SunOS 5.8
Solaris 7 --> SunOS 5.7
Conclusion : So, as per above data, My OS version SunOS 5.9 corresponds to Solaris 9 which can support ECC 6.0 as per PAM.So installation is supported.
I would like to confirm above conclusion.
Please share your views.
- Nirav.

> On my Solaris Server, when I execute "uname -a" i get,
>
> " SunOS 5.9 Sun4u Spac .. ".
>
> Conclusion : So, as per above data, My OS version SunOS 5.9 corresponds to Solaris 9 which can support ECC 6.0 as per PAM.So installation is supported.
Yes.
SunOS is the "old term" for the operating system.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaris_(operating_system)
<...>
On September 4, 1991, Sun announced that it would replace its existing BSD-derived Unix, SunOS 4, with one based on SVR4. This was identified internally as SunOS 5, but a new marketing name was introduced at the same time: Solaris 2.[4] While SunOS 4.1.x micro releases were retroactively named Solaris 1 by Sun, the Solaris name is almost exclusively used to refer to the SVR4-derived SunOS 5.0 and later
<...>
Markus

Creation of trusted RFCs between two systems

Hai,
Can anyone help me to create TRUSTED RFC between two systems ie Solution Manager and the Production. To carry out Service desk facility.

Dear Mohan,
You can create RFC's in the Solution manager system using T-Code SMSY. there you find all your installed systems select the system from the left hand side under Landscape Components click on Application Server ABAP on the right hand side you will find a tab client in this screen select the client for which you want to create TRFC. Go to change mode and click on the button Generate RFC with Assistance. Carry out the wizard for creating the RFC's...

What is the difference between Business System and Business Service?

Hi
Please tell me what is the difference between Business System and Business Service...? In real time at what situation we will use Business System and in what situations we will use Business Service..? Please help me
Best Regards
Ravi Shankar B

HI,
Business system:
If you want to address a particular business system as the sender or receiver of messages, choose this service type.
A business system is an actual application system in a system landscape. A business system (service) comprises information about the inbound and outbound interfaces and the software component versions of the business system.
You usually use business system services when configuring internal company processes.
Business Service:
If you want to address an abstract business entity as the sender or receiver of messages, choose this service type.
Using a business service, you can define the technical or business subunits of the companies involved and then assign them the relevant interfaces.
You usually use business services when configuring cross-company processes. In this case, you only make your interfaces known to the business partners involved and either do not make any details about your own system landscape available, or only specific details.
For example, you can define RosettaNet Partner Interface Processes (PIPs) as business services.
Regards,
Sudheer.

Difference between Business system and Business service.

Hi All,
Can any one explain in detail difference between Business system and Business service.
As we commonly say, Business service is for those system which are not in our landscape.
Can any one explain in which particular scenarios we will go for Business Service.
Reg
Bapuraj

Hi Bapuraj,
Business System
Business system is a logical system, and there is an importance on physical existence of the system.Also SLD entry is required.
It is generally used for SAP applications, this is just a general prinicple followed but not mandatory.
Business Component(formerly Service)
You use a Business Component, when you do not have the System details of the the partner system to which you want to communicate. i.e. you have not configured the partner system in SLD.
Business Service is an Absract Unit with Sender and Receiver Interfaces,In this case you need to explicitly add the message interfaces while doing configuration in ID.
It is generally used for NON-SAP applications, this is just a general prinicple followed but not mandatory.
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
<LINKS CAN BE SEARCHED FOR BASIC QUESTIONS>
-santosh.
Edited by: Prateek Raj Srivastava on Jan 12, 2012 10:01 PM

Anyone know when the 'Patch' or 'service pack' will be released for UDS 5? It doesn't work correctly on Solaris systems.

When trying to export code from older versions of forte and import the code into UDS 5, the imports don't work correctly on Sun server, Solaris system. Errors in the Windows. Seems to be a common problem, but haven't heard of any patch yet.

The SP1 for UDS 5 or 5.0.3 will be out in 2-3 weeks. I already have a beta copy of SP1 so I am sure you can request this if you open a case on your problem. I have never ran into the problem you are describing.
ka

Need detail information, steps would be nicer, to upgrade from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010 to setup in test system first then try on production, since not much room for downtime, thanks bekir

Need detail information, steps would be nicer, to upgrade from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010 to setup in test system first then try on production, since not much room for downtime, thanks bekir

Hi,
Overview of the upgrade progress from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010 including the following steps:
Installing Exchange 2010 within your organization on new hardware.
Configuring Exchange 2010 Client Access.
Creating a set of legacy host names and associating those host names with your Exchange 2003 infrastructure.
Obtaining a digital certificate with the names you'll be using during the coexistence period and installing it on your Exchange 2010 Client Access server.
Associating the host name you currently use for your Exchange 2003 infrastructure with your newly installed Exchange 2010 infrastructure.
Moving mailboxes from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010.
Decommissioning your Exchange 2003 infrastructure.
For more details, please refer to this following document.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff805040(v=exchg.141).aspx
Best Regards.

How to Transport G/L Accounts between two systems?

Hi,
I am trying to move the Chart Of Accounts along with Company dependent data from our Dev to QA system. I used transaction OBY9 to transport the chart of accounts however, it is only transporting chart of accounts related data and I had to re-create those accounts in Company Code.
I also tried to use FS15 and FS16 between two systems however, no luck. Could you please provide any guidance based on your experience?
Thanks,
Durgesh.

Hi John,
For activating ALE for a particular message type there are following prerequisites:
1. Set up the RFC Connection (ABAP) between two systems
2. Configure model view in Sender system
3. Distribute Model view from sender system
4. Generate partner profile from sender system (In sender system go to tcode WE20 go to partner type LS and maintain outbound parameter for message type GLMAST)
5. In receiving system go to tcode WE20 go to partner type LS and maintain Inbound parameter --> Message type GLMAST and Process code GLMA.
Save entries and the above should work for you.
Generate IDOC for one GL Account and try to send company code date for one company code first. The message will appear which says "one idoc transferred".
Regards
Kapil

Compiler directives to differetiate between solaris 9 and solaris 10

i have an API which makes certain function calls which are different for solaris 9 and solaris 10. i cannot add my own defines, since that would mean that applications too would have to define them.
does the Sun Workshop compiler provide any default directives to differentiate between solaris 9 and solaris 10? something like #ifdef __SunOS_5.10 or something like that?
thanks.

As explained in the C Users Guide, the compiler predefines several macros, one of which is represents the Solaris version number.
The macro name is derived from the output of the commands
uname -s and uname -r, starting with __, connected by _, and with dots replaced by _.
Running on Solaris 9:
% uname -s
SunOS
% uname -r
5.9
The defined macro name is __SunOS_5_9
On Solaris 10 you get __SunOS_5_10
__SunOS_5_9

[Q]IPinIP setup between Solaris 8 Systems

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for