QoS Setting

Hello There,
I was wondering if anybody could tell me how to set up QoS on WRVS 4400N, because when I try set it up on download and upload bandwidth there are nothing changes in traffic connection in fact my bandwidth become smaller.
Btw my connection from ISP
DL 6 MBps
UL 1,5 MBps.
Thank

Cablak,
Remember that you will only be able to control the traffic while it is on your equipment, once it leaves your network it is up to the ISP's to priorities the traffic how they want. You could police the traffic meaning when you are receiving traffic on the WAN when it is being placed into the buffers it would allow some types of traffic through with little to no buffer and buffer other traffic if needed due to the speed of the LAN, However usually the bandwidth coming in from the ISP in your case 6Mbps is much slower than the LAN at a minimum of 10Mbps usually 100 or 1000Mbps. There should be no reason why traffic is being held up getting onto your network.
The traffic going to the Internet you could QoS and shape the traffic as it leaves your network, for you 100Mbps to 1,5Mbps.  You could give lets say voice traffic 512Kbps guaranty and the rest of the bandwidth to other forms of data, but you will need to do research on your traffic. If you set a protocols priority too low it might cause packet retransmission if it is TCP and cause more bandwidth being taken up vs less. Also if it is UDP traffic it might be dropped completly and stop working.
Make sure you are manually changing your Up and Down to match what you are getting from the ISP. Also remember if you priorities lets say voice over Data then you will see slower speed tests because you told it to.
I don't know your settings, or the type of traffic you have on your network, to know why you are seeing the results you are seeing but I hope this helps,
Cisco Small Business Support Center
Randy Manthey
CCNA, CCNA - Security

Similar Messages

  • ACE module - Qos - set ip tos #

    All,
    Trying to mark traffic to/from L4 rules in the ACE.
    Documentation (like always) says it's really easy.  Mark traffic by using the "set ip tos <value>" command in Policy/Class configuration.  Ok, so I do this, set ip tos 24.
    Enable qos globally on the 6500 host, but don't see the traffic being marked.
    sh mls qos says that packets are being modified by module 5 (ACE)
    But I never see the tos value in any of my captures either via netflow from the host 6500, or at the firewall one hop away.
    sh mls qos:
    QoS is enabled globally
      Policy marking depends on port_trust
      QoS ip packet dscp rewrite enabled globally
      Input mode for GRE Tunnel is Pipe mode
      Input mode for MPLS is Pipe mode
    QoS Trust state is CoS on the following interface:
    Te3/1
    QoS Trust state is DSCP on the following interface:
    Gi2/3
      Vlan or Portchannel(Multi-Earl) policies supported: Yes
      Egress policies supported: Yes
    ----- Module [5] -----
      QoS global counters:
        Total packets: 207147888661
        IP shortcut packets: 0
        Packets dropped by policing: 0
        IP packets with TOS changed by policing: 2663386
        IP packets with COS changed by policing: 4889352
        Non-IP packets with COS changed by policing: 0
        MPLS packets with EXP changed by policing: 0
    Can someone explain to me what I've got wrong here?  Is the ACE simply marking traffic destined for the servers behind it and not the return traffic?  Am I missunderstanding something?

    Well... hopefully someone knows how to classify traffic coming from the ACE.
    I've given up on using the ACE to mark traffic as I'm fairly certain it won't do it.  At least not the way I want.
    However, now I've taken to marking ingress on the rserver switch ports... which has resulted in a partially sucessful solution.  Problem is, "partially" successful.
    You'll have a bunch of little conversations like this with no tos value full of push-acks:
    10:29:53.527526 207.161.222.68.2828 > 205.200.114.228.http: P 2954:3455(501) ack 203152 win 65535 (DF)
    10:29:53.527698 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: . ack 3455 win 32267
    10:29:53.555271 207.161.222.68.2828 > 205.200.114.228.http: P 3455:3686(231) ack 203152 win 65535 (DF)
    10:29:53.562676 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: P 203152:203784(632) ack 3686 win 32768
    10:29:53.674758 207.161.222.68.2828 > 205.200.114.228.http: P 3686:4036(350) ack 203784 win 64903 (DF)
    10:29:53.690853 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: P 203784:205244(1460) ack 4036 win 32768
    10:29:53.690863 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: P 205244:206704(1460) ack 4036 win 32768
    10:29:53.690871 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: P 206704:208164(1460) ack 4036 win 32768
    10:29:53.690879 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: P 208164:209624(1460) ack 4036 win 32768
    10:29:53.690887 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: P 209624:211084(1460) ack 4036 win 32768
    10:29:53.690895 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: P 211084:212544(1460) ack 4036 win 32768
    But then you'll see another conversation pop up with the correct markings
    10:31:53.845287 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: . 32753:34213(1460) ack 1082 win 62808 (DF) [tos 0x48]
    10:31:53.845298 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: . 34213:35673(1460) ack 1082 win 62808 (DF) [tos 0x48]
    10:31:53.845306 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: . 35673:37133(1460) ack 1082 win 62808 (DF) [tos 0x48]
    10:31:53.845313 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: . 37133:38593(1460) ack 1082 win 62808 (DF) [tos 0x48]
    10:31:53.845321 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: . 38593:40053(1460) ack 1082 win 62808 (DF) [tos 0x48]
    10:31:53.845328 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: . 40053:41513(1460) ack 1082 win 62808 (DF) [tos 0x48]
    10:31:53.845335 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: . 41513:42973(1460) ack 1082 win 62808 (DF) [tos 0x48]
    10:31:53.845343 205.200.114.228.http > 207.161.222.68.2828: . 42973:44433(1460) ack 1082 win 62808 (DF) [tos 0x48]
    I think what's happening, is that the conversations full of the P-acks is the load balancer communicating directly with the client (i.e. LB pretending to be the server), whereas the marked traffic is "data only" which the load balancer isn't mangling (like it might/probably is doing with the p-acks) on it's way back to the client.
    I also can't modify the configuration of the "virtual ten gig" interface that the 6500 uses as a connection to the ACE module, so can't mark traffic there either.  And though I still have a couple of things to try, I don't believe I can do egress marking on a trunk from the 6500 either (connection to the firewalls).
    So.... PLEASE... Anyone???  Ideas???

  • NMH405 and QOS setting on Router to optimize network traffic

    Are there settings to optimize the NMH405 on a Network.  I'm using a Westell DSL Wireless 4 port Modem/Router with QOS options.
    It seems that there is a lot of lag time now when I try to move and read files to or on the NMH405.  If adjusting my router to work well with the NMH405 will help through basic or advanced funtions I'm willing to do that.  This could also help when using the SONY Playstation 3 to access music and photos.
    All the best,
    Thank you 

    Committed Information Rate (%)   Peak Burst Size (ms)   Committed Burst Size (ms)   Max Queue Size:   Can any of these be changed to optimize the NMH405? Thank you? Latency Measurements: Latency Boundary Boundary 1: 0 ms Boundary 2: 10 ms Boundary 3: 20 ms Boundary 4: 40 ms Boundary 5: 100 ms Boundary 6: 1000 ms Boundary 7: 3000 ms  Latency Threshold (ms)   Fragmentation Settings: IP Fragmentation Enable  IP Fragment Size 100 148 244 292 340 388 436 

  • Hyper-V 2012 R2 QoS for a specific set of VMs?

    I'm trying to figure out how to setup SCVMM 2012 R2 with a Logical Switch to support QoS for a specific set up VMs. Specifically, I have a subnet that will have a variety of VMs running, but within that subnet I have a handful of VMs that need a unique
    software QoS setting. Is this possible?
    Blog: www.derekseaman.com, VMware vExpert 2012/2013

    Hi VderekS,
    In addition please refer to the following link  :
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/privatecloud/archive/2013/04/03/configure-nic-teaming-and-qos-with-vmm-2012-sp1-by-kristian-nese.aspx
    Best Regards
    Elton Ji
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Setting up Cisco SLM248GT-NA switch for VoIP

    Hello Everyone,
    We have a Cisco slm248gt-na smart switch in our office that I am trying to configure to support and optimize for VoIP. We have desktops hooked up off the phones in most cases. Are there any config guidelines to optimize the switch so it has proper QOS set and VoIP gets higher priority over data.
    Thanks, Kind Regards
    Shabbir

    Hello Tom,
    Thanks for your reply.
    We have a pretty straight forward setup. We have 15 Cisco SPA303 phones hooked up to switch and the desktop are connoted via the phone. We have a wireless LAN and a corporate server that servers as a file sharing/vpn type setup. Other than that there are no devices hooked up. We had to implement auto voice vlan feature but were still running into issues like occasional poor voice quality and one way audio type issues. However I did notice something in the configuration menu "Telephone OUI", could you please help us on how to implement that. We are trying to implement best practice to avoid voip related issues that we have been having.
    We also see all the ports in trunk mode. Is that the recommended setting or should we change it to access mode?
    Thanks, Kind Regards

  • QoS group policy in UCCE 9.0 getting refreshed

    Hello,
    We upgraded a couple clients onto our HCS environment. Since we have had a couple outages where the A side loses connection with the B side. Normally this is related to some network interruption and it appears that way in the logs. However when I look in the system event viewer on the call server I see the following:
    Log Name:      System
    Source:        Tcpip
    Date:          2/10/2014 6:39:07 PM
    Event ID:      16501
    Task Category: None
    Level:         Information
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      USPHXXXXX
    Description:
    Computer QoS policies successfully refreshed. Policy changes detected.
    AND
    The Advanced QoS Setting for inbound TCP throughput level successfully refreshed.  Setting value is not specified by any QoS policy. Local computer default will be applied.
    I can match these up before every outage. As you guys know after 8.5 Cisco switched from packet scheduler based qos to the group policy. So I'm wondering if anyone else has seen this in 9.0. The first time I thought maybe it was coeincedence but since have seen it on other outages on completely seperate instances. The thing I wonder is if this is just an affect of an outage but I see this before is loses connection to the call server's duplexed partner. So believe it may actually be the cause.

    Yes eventually we did after bringing up the firmware, adapter driver, bios. Here is a chart I made for different C-series. Disregard column 2.
    C-Series CIMC
    C210-M2 Broadcom NIC driver version does not match required version for UCS release 1.4.3j
    Interoperability and stability issues
    Confirm with Cisco TAC then update to versions
    Adapter Driver   = 2.2.1l.v50.1
    Adapter Firmware = 6.0.0
    Boot Code / BIOS = 6.4.4
    C-Series CIMC
    C210-M1 Intel Onboard NIC driver version does not match required version for UCS release 1.4.3j
    Interoperability and stability issues
    Confirm with Cisco TAC then update to versions
    Adapter Driver   = 2.1.11.1
    Adapter Firmware = 1.4-3
    Boot Code / BIOS = 1.3.35
    C-Series CIMC
    C240-M3 Intel NIC driver version does not match required version for UCS 1.5.1f
    Interoperability and stability issues
    Confirm with Cisco TAC then update to versions
    Adapter Driver   = 4.0.17
    Adapter Firmware = 1.6-1
    Boot Code / BIOS = v1.3.98
    C-Series CIMC
    C240-M3 Intel NIC driver version does not match required version for UCS 1.5.3
    Interoperability and stability issues
    Confirm with Cisco TAC then update to versions
    Adapter Driver   = 4.2.16.3
    Adapter Firmware = 1.6-3
    Boot Code / BIOS = v1.5.04

  • Making sure Qos is working?

    Hi All,
    This question has probably been asked a million times but I cannot find a solid answer. We had our routers setup by an external company and I'm not sure if they completely finished the Qos settings on the routers. How do I check?
    I am new to QoS so bear with me.
    Our setup can be seen in the diagram attached.
    The user switches are running AutoQos on each port
    interface GigabitEthernet6/0/46
    description ### CISCO VOICE & DATA PORT ###
    switchport access vlan 5
    switchport mode access
    switchport voice vlan 10
    srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20
    queue-set 2 <-- Not sure why this is set on some switches and not on others
    priority-queue out
    mls qos trust device cisco-phone
    mls qos trust cos
    auto qos voip cisco-phone
    spanning-tree portfast
    service-policy input AutoQoS-Police-CiscoPhone
    There is a global QoS config set automatically by AutoQos template.
    The Etherchannel-Trunk ports from the user switches to the Core switches and vice versa have the following commands set
    mls qos trust dscp
    priority-queue out
    Q1: What Qos settings need to be added to the core switch? I have no phones are attached to it.
    Currently we have the following global Qos values set
    mls qos
    mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
    Q2: What Qos settings need to be added to the router subinterface ports and global configs.
    mls qos is not set globally but there are a bunch of policy-maps and class-maps?
    Subinterface ports
    interface GigabitEthernet0/0.10
    description ### VOICE VLAN INTERFACE ###
    encapsulation dot1Q 10
    ip address 192.168.10.254 255.255.255.0
    Interface 0/1 to Private network (class-maps and policy maps)
    class-map match-all AllTraffic
    match any
    class-map match-any JTAPI
    match access-group 110
    class-map match-any voip-sig
    match access-group name voip-signal
    match ip dscp af31
    match ip dscp cs3
    class-map match-any voip-rtp
    match ip rtp 16384 16383
    match ip dscp ef
    policy-map llq-voip
    class voip-rtp
      priority 256
    class voip-sig
      bandwidth 16
    class JTAPI
      set dscp cs3
      bandwidth 20
    class class-default
      fair-queue
      random-detect dscp-based
    policy-map shape-wan
    class AllTraffic
      shape average 50000000
      service-policy llq-voip
    policy-map mark-all
    class voip-rtp
      set dscp ef
    class voip-sig
      set dscp cs3
    class class-default
      set dscp default
    ip access-list extended voip-signal
    permit tcp any any eq 1720
    permit tcp any eq 1720 any
    permit tcp any any eq 2000
    permit tcp any eq 2000 any
    permit tcp any any range 11000 11999
    permit tcp any range 11000 11999 any
    permit tcp any any eq 2748
    permit tcp any eq 2748 any
    permit tcp any any eq 8404
    permit tcp any eq 8404 any
    permit tcp any any eq 42027
    permit tcp any eq 42027 any
    permit tcp any any range 59000 59025
    permit tcp any range 59000 59025 any
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    description ### Private Network ###
    ip address 192.168.255.2 255.255.255.252
    duplex full
    speed 100
    service-policy input mark-all
    service-policy output shape-wan
    Still looking into what all these values mean.
    Regards

    show policy-map interface GigabitEthernet6/0/46 (This is off the Melbourne 3750G-USER01 switch)
    GigabitEthernet6/0/46
      Service-policy input: AUTOQOS-SRND4-CISCOPHONE-POLICY
        Class-map: AUTOQOS_VOIP_DATA_CLASS (match-all)
          0 packets, 0 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: ip dscp ef (46)
        Class-map: AUTOQOS_VOIP_SIGNAL_CLASS (match-all)
          0 packets, 0 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: ip dscp cs3 (24)
        Class-map: AUTOQOS_DEFAULT_CLASS (match-all)
          0 packets, 0 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: access-group name AUTOQOS-ACL-DEFAULT
        Class-map: class-default (match-any)
          0 packets, 0 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: any
            0 packets, 0 bytes
            5 minute rate 0 bps
    show policy-map int GigabitEthernet0/1 (Off the Melbourne 2800 Router )
    GigabitEthernet0/1
      Service-policy input: mark-all
        Class-map: voip-rtp (match-any)
          422882260 packets, 73717373837 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 117000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: ip rtp 16384 16383
            422145770 packets, 73561857794 bytes
            5 minute rate 114000 bps
          Match: ip dscp ef (46)
            736511 packets, 155520147 bytes
            5 minute rate 2000 bps
          QoS Set
            dscp ef
              Packets marked 422882281
        Class-map: voip-sig (match-any)
          400358097 packets, 44842004330 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 31000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: access-group name voip-signal
            396250102 packets, 44527028287 bytes
            5 minute rate 31000 bps
          Match: ip dscp af31 (26)
            2787234 packets, 234418763 bytes
            5 minute rate 0 bps
          Match: ip dscp cs3 (24)
            1320764 packets, 80557256 bytes
            5 minute rate 0 bps
          QoS Set
            dscp cs3
              Packets marked 400358262
        Class-map: class-default (match-any)
          18847301096 packets, 13836330525020 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 16131000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: any
          QoS Set
            dscp default
              Packets marked 18847294088
      Service-policy output: shape-wan
        Class-map: AllTraffic (match-all)
          18031038728 packets, 11420761193505 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 12704000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: any
          Traffic Shaping
               Target/Average   Byte   Sustain   Excess    Interval  Increment
                 Rate           Limit  bits/int  bits/int  (ms)      (bytes)
             50000000/50000000  312500 1250000   1250000   25        156250
            Adapt  Queue     Packets   Bytes     Packets   Bytes     Shaping
            Active Depth                         Delayed   Delayed   Active
            -      0         850797478 4183363168 170360913 3101776193 no
          Service-policy : llq-voip
            Class-map: voip-rtp (match-any)
              341581698 packets, 27282557780 bytes
              5 minute offered rate 56000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
              Match: ip rtp 16384 16383
                341574850 packets, 27281749554 bytes
                5 minute rate 56000 bps
              Match: ip dscp ef (46)
                6851 packets, 808418 bytes
                5 minute rate 0 bps
              Queueing
                Strict Priority
                Output Queue: Conversation 264
                Bandwidth 256 (kbps) Burst 6400 (Bytes)
                (pkts matched/bytes matched) 2940781/225999928
                (total drops/bytes drops) 537/661802
            Class-map: voip-sig (match-any)
              247531259 packets, 23679757170 bytes
              5 minute offered rate 82000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
              Match: access-group name voip-signal
                247480960 packets, 23672100642 bytes
                5 minute rate 82000 bps
              Match: ip dscp af31 (26)
                49905 packets, 7602622 bytes
                5 minute rate 0 bps
              Match: ip dscp cs3 (24)
                401 packets, 54278 bytes
                5 minute rate 0 bps
              Queueing
                Output Queue: Conversation 265
                Bandwidth 16 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
                (pkts matched/bytes matched) 779747/105298466
            (depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/765/0
            Class-map: JTAPI (match-any)
              0 packets, 0 bytes
              5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
              Match: access-group 110
                0 packets, 0 bytes
                5 minute rate 0 bps
              QoS Set
                dscp cs3
                  Packets marked 0
              Queueing
                Output Queue: Conversation 266
                Bandwidth 20 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
                (pkts matched/bytes matched) 0/0
            (depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
            Class-map: class-default (match-any)
              17441925990 packets, 11369798942000 bytes
              5 minute offered rate 12554000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
              Match: any
              Queueing
                Flow Based Fair Queueing
                Maximum Number of Hashed Queues 256
            (total queued/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/380841/0
                 exponential weight: 9
       dscp    Transmitted      Random drop      Tail drop    Minimum Maximum  Mark
               pkts/bytes       pkts/bytes       pkts/bytes    thresh  thresh  prob
       af11       0/0               0/0              0/0           32      40  1/10
       af12       0/0               0/0              0/0           28      40  1/10
       af13       0/0               0/0              0/0           24      40  1/10
       af21       0/0               0/0              0/0           32      40  1/10
       af22       0/0               0/0              0/0           28      40  1/10
       af23       0/0               0/0              0/0           24      40  1/10
       af31       0/0               0/0              0/0           32      40  1/10
       af32       0/0               0/0              0/0           28      40  1/10
       af33       0/0               0/0              0/0           24      40  1/10
       af41       0/0               0/0              0/0           32      40  1/10
       af42       0/0               0/0              0/0           28      40  1/10
       af43       0/0               0/0              0/0           24      40  1/10
        cs1 13779821/19479353285      2/2948           0/0           22      40  1/10
        cs2       0/0               0/0              0/0           24      40  1/10
        cs3       0/0               0/0              0/0           26      40  1/10
        cs4       0/0               0/0              0/0           28      40  1/10
        cs5       0/0               0/0              0/0           30      40  1/10
        cs6 1460106/221012238       0/0              0/0           32      40  1/10
        cs7       0/0               0/0              0/0           34      40  1/10
         ef       0/0               0/0              0/0           36      40  1/10
       rsvp       0/0               0/0              0/0           36      40  1/10
    default 246455719/11349551197230 257261/380315020 123578/179057908   20      40  1/10
        Class-map: class-default (match-any)
          0 packets, 0 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: any
    Hope this helps?
    Do I need any class-maps policy-maps set on the Melbourne 3750X-CORE and 3750X switches.
    * I am looking at basic Qos rules Voip packets take priority ... leave all other data packets untouched.
    Thanks for having a look. Cheers

  • QoS Questions for 3750 Switches

    2x3750 switches are stacked and we are trying to simulate traffic congestion at the UTP ports by using Smartbit 6000C. The objective of the test is to see if the QoS setting works in reality even though we see from Wireshark that the packets are marked with DSCP for voice traffic.
    Setup is as follows :
    Smartbit<->Avaya IP Phone<->3750 switches<->6509 switch.
    Please note that the configuration is set on the 3750 switch port as well as trusted on the Cat 6 switch port. However, when I set to continuous traffic with byte size of 64. Even though its a 100Mbps port, the Avaya IP Phone is already acting weird with hanged symptom. Just side note is that performing "show mls qos inter gi2/0/7 statistic" shows that data and voice traffic are marked on the different priority which seemed correct.
    1) Is this the right way to test? If not, what should be the correct way?
    2) The port that's connected to Smartbit is configured and it seemed that with the continuous traffic, even other IP Phones are hanged even though I have set Smartbit to hit on the IP address of the CAT6 Switch port. This is not normal right as this is supposed to be unicast traffic. Any idea what could be the reason?

    Hello Brandon,
    I understand your concern and how you want to test, but with the VoIP services you need to understand that there are 2 points (telephones if you want) involved. Your local one, where you might have taken all the necessary steps to protect and prioritize your voice traffic, and the oposite end which also need to have the voice packets prioritized.
    Now, from your description, I understand that the packets (voice and data) marked correctly (I believe on C3750), but that's not enough. You need to use CBWFQ together with LLQ to give priority to the Voice traffic over data in case of congestion. Do you have such configuration? Can you show us some excerpt from it?
    Next, during the testing, you said that your phone hang-up...where you in a call?
    To respond to your questions:
    1. The start is ok, but we need more details. You are pushing traffic from Smarbit, this is your local end, but where is the traffic pushed to (remote end), who is receiving the traffic?
    2. In theory, you shouldn't have any impact over voice if links are 100Mbit, only if you have such a power packet generator that could fill 100Mbit. What do you mean by "This is not normal right as this is supposed to be unicast traffic"? VoIP is also unicast traffic...
    I can see that you are determined to solve this issue, and this is OK as it will help you back with gained knowledge, but I have to warn you that troubleshooting QoS / Voice related problems may be more tricky than you think, as it will involve a strong know-how in these areas.
    We will help, but you have to come back with more precise details.
    Good luck!
    Calin

  • Tiered QOS

    Hi,
    I am trying to mark packets at VAI interfaces and then use this markings to
    classify traffic in different classes when they exit the router downstream
    to carrier. I dont see packet being classified at physical interface yet
    the ip precedence accounting shows correct marking
    this is on 7200 12.2(33)SRE6 SP services and have also tried on 12.4 T but same results.
    Scenario:
    Traffic IN >>> LNS>>> VAI (policy outbound mark traffic) >>> Physical
    interface >>(Shaping + queueing)
    Configuration
    VAI Class-maps and policy-map
    class-map match-all GOLD
    match access-group 101
    class-map match-all SILVER
    match access-group 102
    access-list 101 permit icmp host 111.111.111.111 any
    access-list 102 permit icmp host 222.222.222.222 any
    policy-map STD_POLICY1
    class GOLD
    set dscp af21
    class SILVER
    set dscp af22
    class class-default
    Show commands for VAI
    LNS#show policy-map session
    SSS session identifier 7 -
    Service-policy output: STD_POLICY1
    Class-map: GOLD (match-all)
    4135 packets, 4522926 bytes
    30 second offered rate 9000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps
    Match: access-group 101
    QoS Set
    dscp af21
    Packets marked 4138
    Class-map: SILVER (match-all)
    3649 packets, 3831450 bytes
    30 second offered rate 9000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps
    Match: access-group 102
    QoS Set
    dscp af22
    Packets marked 3653
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
    418 packets, 37270 bytes
    30 second offered rate 0000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps
    Match: any
    LNS# show access-lists
    Extended IP access list 101
    10 permit icmp host 111.111.111.111 any (4171 matches)
    Extended IP access list 102
    10 permit icmp host 222.222.222.222 any (3685 matches)
    ====
    Physical Interface Class-map and policy-map Configuration:
    class-map match-all EF
    match dscp ef
    class-map match-any CS1
    match dscp af11
    match dscp af12
    match dscp af13
    class-map match-any CS2
    match dscp af21
    match dscp af22
    match dscp af23
    match dscp cs2
    class-map match-any CS3
    match dscp af31
    match dscp af32
    match dscp af33
    class-map match-any CS4
    match dscp af41
    match dscp af42
    match dscp af43
    policy-map CHILD_POLICY
    class EF
    priority percent 10
    class CS4
    bandwidth percent 30
    random-detect dscp-based
    fair-queue
    class CS3
    bandwidth percent 20
    random-detect dscp-based
    fair-queue
    class CS2
    bandwidth percent 10
    fair-queue
    random-detect dscp-based
    class CS1
    bandwidth percent 5
    fair-queue
    random-detect dscp-based
    class class-default
    >> Shaping policy
    policy-map PARENT_1M_POLICY
    class class-default
    shape average 1000000
    service-policy CHILD_POLICY
    SHOW COMMANDS FOR PHYSICAL INT
    LNS# show policy-map interface
    FastEthernet0/0
    Service-policy output: PARENT_1M_POLICY
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
    1148 packets, 90689 bytes
    5 minute offered rate 0000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps
    Match: any
    Queueing
    queue limit 64 packets
    (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
    (pkts output/bytes output) 8439/7685662
    shape (average) cir 1000000, bc 4000, be 4000
    target shape rate 1000000
    Service-policy : CHILD_POLICY
    queue stats for all priority classes:
    Queueing
    queue limit 64 packets
    (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
    (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
    Class-map: EF (match-all)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute offered rate 0000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps
    Match: dscp ef (46)
    Priority: 10% (100 kbps), burst bytes 2500, b/w exceed drops: 0
    Class-map: CS4 (match-any)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute offered rate 0000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps
    Match: dscp af41 (34)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute rate 0 bps
    Match: dscp af42 (36)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute rate 0 bps
    Match: dscp af43 (38)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute rate 0 bps
    Queueing
    queue limit 64 packets
    (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops/flowdrops) 0/0/0/0
    (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
    bandwidth 30% (300 kbps)
    Exp-weight-constant: 9 (1/512)
    Mean queue depth: 0 packets
    dscp Transmitted Random drop Tail/Flow drop
    Minimum Maximum Mark
    pkts/bytes pkts/bytes pkts/bytes
    thresh thresh prob
    Fair-queue: per-flow queue limit 16
    Class-map: CS3 (match-any)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute offered rate 0000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps
    Match: dscp af31 (26)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute rate 0 bps
    Match: dscp af32 (28)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute rate 0 bps
    Match: dscp af33 (30)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute rate 0 bps
    Queueing
    queue limit 64 packets
    (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops/flowdrops) 0/0/0/0
    (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
    bandwidth 20% (200 kbps)
    Exp-weight-constant: 9 (1/512)
    Mean queue depth: 0 packets
    dscp Transmitted Random drop Tail/Flow drop
    Minimum Maximum Mark
    pkts/bytes pkts/bytes pkts/bytes
    thresh thresh prob
    Fair-queue: per-flow queue limit 16
    Class-map: CS2 (match-any)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute offered rate 0000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps
    Match: dscp af21 (18)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute rate 0 bps
    Match: dscp af22 (20)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute rate 0 bps
    Match: dscp af23 (22)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute rate 0 bps
    Match: dscp cs2 (16)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute rate 0 bps
    Queueing
    queue limit 64 packets
    (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops/flowdrops) 0/0/0/0
    (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
    bandwidth 10% (100 kbps)
    Fair-queue: per-flow queue limit 16
    Exp-weight-constant: 9 (1/512)
    Mean queue depth: 0 packets
    dscp Transmitted Random drop Tail/Flow drop
    Minimum Maximum Mark
    pkts/bytes pkts/bytes pkts/bytes
    thresh thresh prob
    Class-map: CS1 (match-any)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute offered rate 0000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps
    Match: dscp af11 (10)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute rate 0 bps
    Match: dscp af12 (12)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute rate 0 bps
    Match: dscp af13 (14)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute rate 0 bps
    Queueing
    queue limit 64 packets
    (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops/flowdrops) 0/0/0/0
    (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
    bandwidth 5% (50 kbps)
    Fair-queue: per-flow queue limit 16
    Exp-weight-constant: 9 (1/512)
    Mean queue depth: 0 packets
    dscp Transmitted Random drop Tail/Flow drop
    Minimum Maximum Mark
    pkts/bytes pkts/bytes pkts/bytes
    thresh thresh prob
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
    1148 packets, 90689
    bytes #####PACKETS
    MATCHING HERE INSTEAD OF CLASSES ABOVE
    5 minute offered rate 0000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps
    Match: any
    queue limit 64 packets
    (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
    (pkts output/bytes output) 8439/7685662
    ###PRECEDENCE ACCOUNTING
    LNS# show int fa0/0 precedence
    FastEthernet0/0
    Output
    Precedence 0: 697 packets, 46002 bytes
    Precedence 2: 7062 packets, 7697580 bytes
    Precedence 6: 430 packets, 51888 bytes
    So in short the VAI policy is marking packet correctly, IP precedence
    accounting shows hits but on the main policy it skips its..
    Interestingly if i remove VAI policy and mark the packets from an upstream
    router using extended pings they are identified by the physical interface
    correctly and matches against appropriate classes.
    Any hints will be appreciated.
    Cheers
    Hitesh

    Disclaimer
    The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    Logically, what you're doing makes sense, but only Cisco "knows" how their queuing really works.  I've long suspected their embedded CBWFQ shapers have their own queues, which you may not have direct control over for setting their queue depths.
    Yes, logically, there's a relationship between bandwidth (including shaping) and queue limits, but it depends on multiple factors.  Shaping is also a special case, because although you're trying to emulate a certain link bandwidth, it's not the same.

  • QOS Trouble and questions

    Hi All,
    I have some trouble regarding the QOS implementation for the VOICE communication.
    I tried to setup the low latency queuing but it showed that it is weighted fair
    queuing.
    I want to apply the strict policy ( reserved the bandwidth) of 128 k for voice.
    After this configuration my voice is still not good ( choppy).
    Attached below is my configuration file.
    Tunnel0 is the outgoing interface and i applied the service policy on ethernet interface. ( e0/0)
    Below is the output of show policy-map interface
    Ethernet0/0
    Service-policy output: LL_QOS
    Class-map: VOICE_CONTROL (match-all)
    34 packets, 3666 bytes
    30 second offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
    Match: access-group name VOICE-CTL_ACL
    Weighted Fair Queueing
    Output Queue: Conversation 265
    Bandwidth 64 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
    (pkts matched/bytes matched) 3/534
    (depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
    QoS Set
    ip precedence 5
    Packets marked 34
    Class-map: VOICE_RTP (match-all)
    1257257 packets, 160414006 bytes
    30 second offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
    Match: access-group name VOICE-RTP_ACL
    Weighted Fair Queueing
    Strict Priority
    Output Queue: Conversation 264
    Bandwidth 128 (kbps) Burst 4800 (Bytes)
    (pkts matched/bytes matched) 773/110734
    (total drops/bytes drops) 0/0
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
    4356827 packets, 3116756548 bytes
    30 second offered rate 63000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
    Match: any
    Weighted Fair Queueing
    Flow Based Fair Queueing
    Maximum Number of Hashed Queues 256
    (total queued/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
    It shows that Queuing strategy is still weighted fair , whereas it should be CBWFQ or LLQ.
    Can some body help me that where i am doing mistake.
    Similar type of configuration is on remote side router.

    Hi all,
    Thanks every body for reply.
    Purpose of GRE tunnel is to avoid the intermediate hops.
    Below are the out put of some voice related commands for codec and payload etc.
    sh call act voi brief
    Telephony call-legs: 1
    SIP call-legs: 0
    H323 call-legs: 1
    Total call-legs: 2
    12CB : 692504155hs.1 +1336 pid:20001 Answer 21002 active
    dur 00:14:26 tx:44010/880200 rx:43301/866020
    IP 172.2.2.6:19080 rtt:216ms pl:785620/40390ms lost:24/1290/1898 delay:210/69/2
    10ms g729r8
    12CB : 692504156hs.1 +1335 pid:10001 Originate 42001 active
    dur 00:14:26 tx:43301/866020 rx:44010/880200
    Tele 1/0/0 (6031): tx:880210/88021/0ms g729r8 noise:0 acom:45 i/0:-11/-59 dBm
    Telephony call-legs: 1
    SIP call-legs: 0
    H323 call-legs: 1
    Total call-legs: 2
    sh voice dsp
    DSP DSP DSPWARE CURR BOOT PAK TX/RX
    TYPE NUM CH CODEC VERSION STATE STATE RST AI VOICEPORT TS ABORT PACK COUNT
    ==== === == ======== ======= ===== ======= === == ========= == ===== ===========
    =
    C5423 001 01 g729r8 3.6.15 busy idle 0 0 1/0/0 NA 0 1949079/191267
    C5428 002 01 g729r8 3.6.15 IDLE idle 0 0 1/0/1 NA 0 1307457/129 438
    Thanks and waiting for help.

  • WRT600N QoS settings do not affect upstream rates

    I have recently purchased a WRT600N router as I have a hard wired wired VoIP phone (Aastra 9112i). I have set the QoS priority for the physical Ethernet port that the phone connects to as high and all of the other ports as normal (I have even tried setting all of the other ports to low).
    The problem I have is that the QoS settings do not affect the upstream rate. I have Shaw Highspeed Extreme service and have run speed tests to Speedtest.net throught the router and can get 20Meg down and ~1 meg up. When I change the QoS settings on the physical Ethernet port my laptop is connected to, the QoS settings do affect the download rate but the QoS settings do not seem to affect the upstream rate.
    Is there any firmware update for the WRT600N where the QoS setting will control/ throttle the upstream rate or is there some other settings I could use on the WRT600N that will provide priority to my VoIP phone.
    Thanks,

    I just checked the Linksys download page and the firmware version posted there 1.01.35 is the same version I have in my router. Please let me know if there are any development plans for the WRT600N QoS controls so the the QoS setting also police the upstream/ upload rates.
    Thanks,

  • QoS Override Per-SSID Bandwith question

    Hi all,
    on a WLAN there is the possibility to override the QoS Bandwidth settings.
    I try to get some more information about these settings, I want to understand this. As well a customer wants to limit user data.
    My question is: This override Per-SSID, are these settings on a AP basis or on the global controller basis?
    The next question resulting out this will then be what if the AP is set to flex-connect with local VLAN traffic, what then?
    Is there a good documentation on this?
    Thanks.

    This section describes BDRL of the 7.3 release. In releases 7.2 and earlier, there is only the ability to limit the downstream throughput across an SSID and per user on the Global interface. With this new feature in the 7.3 release, rate limits can be defined on both upstream and downstream traffic, as well as on a per WLAN basis. These rate limits are individually configured. The rate limits can be configured on WLAN directly instead of QoS profiles, which will override profile values.
    This new feature adds the ability to define throughput limits for users on their wireless networks with a higher granularity. This ability allows setting a priority service to a particular set of clients. A potential use case for this is in hotspot situations (coffee shops, airports, etc) where a company can offer a free low-throughput service to everyone, and charge users for a high-throughput service.
    Note: The enforcement of the rate limits are done on both the controller and AP.
    Rate limiting is supported for APs in Local and FlexConnect mode (both Central and Local switching).
    When the controller is connected and central switching is used the controller will handle the downstream enforcement of per-client rate limit only.
    The AP will always handle the enforcement of the upstream traffic and per-SSID rate limit for downstream traffic.
    For the locally switched environment, both upstream and downstream rate limits will be enforced on the AP. The enforcement on the AP will take place in the dot11 driver. This is where the current classification exists.
    In both directions, per-client rate limit is applied/checked first and per-SSID rate limit is applied/checked second.
    The WLAN rate limiting will always supercede the Global QoS setting for WLAN and user.
    Rate limiting only works for TCP and UDP traffic. Other types of traffic (IPSec, GRE, ICMP, CAPWAP, etc) cannot be limited.
    Only policing is implemented in the 7.3 releases.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/5500-series-wireless-controllers/113682-bdr-limit-guide-00.html

  • Wireless voice and QoS

    I'm pretty sure I know the answer to this but I'm checking here as well.
    With a Cisco WISM2, is it possible to have only voice set up for QoS? I'm not talking about having a dedicated SSID set up for wireless voice with QoS set to Platinum, but a generic SSID that will identify voice traffic and apply the correct QoS settings?
    From what I've seen it's not possible. The reason I ask is we want to install softphones on our tablets and use our existing wireless network to be able to use wireless voice. However, it looks like if we set the QoS on that SSID to Platinum then ALL data on that SSID gets marked as high priority, not just voice traffic.
    Am I correct?

    The QOS settings in the profile on the WLC does not mark packets, it simply allows packets that were marked by the client to keep it's markings up to a set level.
    If you want Wireless Voice to work on your PC's.
    1. Make sure that SSID is set to Platinum (Make sure Platinum is set to a value of 6).
    2. Make sure CUCM is configured to use the desired DSCP values for call control and RTP traffic.
    3. Trust DSCP on the switch port connecting to the on the AP.
    The risk that you take here is that it allows an application on the PC to mark it's packets up to EF and it could chew up your entire priority queue on your network. This is why most people put the wireless phones on it's own SSID.
    I hope this helps.
    Scape

  • VOIP QOS over GRE ISSUE

    Hi All,
    I have this problem with VOIP phone calls been very poor, and need to fix it ASAP.
    I have a stalite link between the Head office and Branch site.
    Head office is cisco 3845 and Branch is cisco 3825.
    And the Phone system is NEC ( with IP Trunk) via the GRE tunnel.
    I have a GRE Tunnel between the sites since the IP address I am using on the LAN are Not supported by the sat Provider.
    Can you please have a look on the attched and advice if I am missing any thing.
    I have configured a QOS setting and applyied it to the tunnel interface per the following Cisco guide
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a008017405e.shtml
    but the QOS polices are not Matching the NEC PBX traffic.
    Thanks for your help
    Nour

    do u know what is the default marking of that traffic i mean the NEC?
    what is the matching crateria u follow to match the NEC PBX traffic ?

  • QOS on GRE mujltipoint

    I use a GRE multipoint tunnel interface for dial backup catcher. What I want to do is apply QOS to the incoming GRE tunnels in catcher. Is there a way to dynamicaly apply QOS to a multipoint tunnel when it is formed?
    I currently want the same QOS setting on each tunnel, but I believe if I apply it to the multipoint tunnel it will apply QOS to the cunulitave traffic rather than the individual streams. Right?
    Applying it on the incomming interface of the remote defeats the purpose.

    A tunnel interface supports many of the same QoS features as a physical interface. The following URl will provide you with more information in configuring QOS in GRe tunnels,
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a008017405e.shtml#qosforgretunn

Maybe you are looking for

  • Gross price for BASB Condition is not picking in Purchase Order invoice tab

    Hi Gurus In taxinj -- conditional base column i added 362 and in pricing procedure for gross price in subtotal column i added 6 but even though when i click invoice tab while creating Purchase Order i am not getting gross price for BASB condition sam

  • My iPhone doesn't charge anymore what should I do?

    I tried 2 of my iphone chargers and my phone just keeps showing the battery but is not showing it charging. I also tried using my mom's radio when you can put your iPod or iPhone on and it won't charge either what should I do?

  • Can anyone help with AirPrint

    Can anyone help with this. I recently purchased an Airport Express unit to connect to my Canon MP 640 via USB. I was advised to download the airport utility app for both my iPad and iPhone, which I did. I also downloaded it on my pc. I have connected

  • IPhoto won't display thumbnails

    I performed a clean install of OS X, and when I copied over the pictures I had backed up iPhoto wouldn't display thumbnails. Old photos have no thumbnails at all, new photos will show thumbnails if I scroll around quickly, but return to blanks if I s

  • For invoice transactions ( Business process ) Automatic A/c determination

    Hi, Its  a data transfer project , using movement type of the material doc's debit/credit indicator i am able to map the corresponding value in Accounting value for  its total reciepts & issues for a particular material. but if it is the case of say