Quality issues already with an hour old X220

The bezel isn't fastened to the bottom of the screen which results in a decently large gap. Missing double-sided tape?
There's light bleed at 4-5 spots at the bottom of the screen, medium size length on the right and upper edges and at the bottom left corner.
The keyboard is very defective. Right clicks when you left click, double-clicks when you click ones, cursor jumping/wandering without input, cursor moving when one of the buttons is depressed.
One keyboard screw missing.
The fan does run constantly. I don't find it as annoying as others, but hopefully this can be fixed in a future bios update.
I'm sending it in tomorrow. The support staff in Atlanta were helpful as always and said the parts are in stock, so hopefully I can get it back soon and get on with smooth ownership after these initial issues are resolved. The machine is built extremely well- better than the T400 and X200T I've had- and the screen is very good as well.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Happy resolution to this is that Lenovo is taking back the defective machine and even paying for return shipping. The nice coincidence that worked this out was that I ended up having two identical machines delivered the same day because the original cancellation request on the first didn't go through. Second unit is working quite nicely.

Similar Messages

  • Quality issues with VGA port on Type 2504 docking station

    Hi,
    I see quality issues on the VGA output of the Type 2504 docking station with a T61. The monitor image is blurred, not much, but enough to be irritating. When I compare the DVI output with the VGA output on two equal NEC MultiSync LCD 2170NX monitors it is a clear difference. If I connect the LCD monitor to the VGA output of the T61 itself, the picture is clean. I have tried both monitors with different cables in different configurations and also adjusted monitors manually, and my conclusion is that it must be the VGA output of the 2504 that generates the un-sharpness. I have got several 2504 docking stations from the IT department to test and all attempts show the same unsharp picture on the LCD connected to the VGA port of any 2504. Recently a colleague got a new laptop and docking station. He also used DVI and VGA on the old setup and had no visible difference between the two monitors. His new setup is a different T but his new dock is also a 2504. Now he has clear difference between his monitors. He also tried several 2540 docks and cables but the difference is still present.
    The unsharpness is not immediately present when just looking at a dual head setup. But after a while it becomes tiresome to look at text, specially black on white, on the monitor connected to the VGA port. There is a slight shadow on the right side of all letters. When looking at non-aliased fonts, they look as if aliased on the VGA connected monitor. Already aliased fonts tend to "smear" and I have the unpleasant feeling that my eyes are not focusing correctly.
    My question is: Is there a different VGA DAC on the docking station, or are the analog signals just wired through from the laptop VGA DAC? Older IBM docks do not have this problem, we have a lot of them at work in dual head configuration with DVI + VGA to compare, and we only see this problem with the 2504.

    VGA is an analogue signal... so it can be affected by the quality of DAC chip used by the GPU associated electronics, the quality of connectors on the vga out and dock (that is why good analgoue audio equipment use gold plated stuffs) and the quality of copper wire and shiedling used in the cable (i.e. Low Oxygen Content Copper wire).
    The above is general description for all people to use <---- so please don't feel offended if i repeat something that is already said. 
    There is NO conversion electronics on the dock per se, they are just passthrough, so no conversion.
    I guess the problem lies with improper shielding somewhere. I have the same problem with my T61/60 and dock and my T40,41,42,43 on five different docks. 
    So i have ended up using lenovo usb2dvi converter on T61 and have two dvi output and bypassed the vga altogether. 
    Regards,
    Jin Li
    May this year, be the year of 'DO'!
    I am a volunteer, and not a paid staff of Lenovo or Microsoft

  • Quality issues with slideshows

    Hi,
    I'm a long term user of PE v9 (basic editing & burning of home vids & slideshows), but I've just bought a new computer & upgraded to Photoshop & PE v11.
    The first slideshow I created (created in Photoshop & exported to PE for adding music, titles etc) had a lot of issues:
    Some of the photos were rotated 90 degrees & stretched (which I noticed & cut out prior to burning), but more importantly,
    The end product once burned to DVD is of terrible quality.
    I seem to recall that when I first set up PE 9 I set a project quality standard that all future projects would follow unless I changed it.  I've looked everywhere in PE 11 & I can't find where this is set.  I'm not overly technical and I'm out of ideas re: where to look to fix these quality issues.
    Can anyone help?
    Thanks,
    Cozzie.

    Hi Apple Miga,
    I've spent literally hours on this trying all sorts of combinations of settings and ways & means of initiating a slideshow.  To my surprise & absolute elation, I finally had a partial win late last night.  I finally got the quality of the slides to be as good as I've been getting for years with PrE v7.  I haven't been able to work out the rotation & stretching of some photos yet, but I'm at least I've got good quality on the photos that didn't rotate (which is the bulk of them).
    Here's what I did, triggered by a comment above by VDOSurfer (thankyou VDOSurfer).  I had actually already tried setting the project settings to DV-PAL (instead of AVCHD-PAL which I'd been using successfully with PrE v7) a couple of times with the same poor results, but I tried it again in a different order as follows:
    Open PrE11.
    Select 'New Project' (ie not existing project)
    Once the new project opens up, select File, New Project (from the file menu at the top of the screen)
    Click on 'Change Settings' at the bottom of the dialog box.  I noticed here that my settings were always defaulting to NTSC/AVCHD 1080p60.  So I changed this to PAL/DV Widescreen 48kHz (I live in Australia, so if you're in the US, I guess you'd select NTSC/DV Widescreen 48kHz).
    Click on the checkbox 'Force selected project settings on this project'.
    Click on Add Media
    I added my slideshow from Photoshop because I'd already prepared it in that product, but you should be able to add it from wherever your photos live.
    Click on Publish+Share, select DVD & Disk, ensure PAL_DOLBY_Widescreen DVD is selected.  (If you're in the US, this would be NTSC).
    Burn as normal.
    This worked very well for me.  Hope it helps.  Please let me know how you go.
    If anyone has any thoughts on how to stop the random rotation & stretching, I'd love to hear.  Note that photos that are rotated & stretched start off in the correct rotation in Photoshop Elements v11 prior to exporting to PrE 11.
    Thanks,
    Cozzie.

  • I am having serious issues trying to alter my old iCloud account with an old non-functioning email to my new apple id with a new email address. The message keeps coming up on all my apple products with my old email (which is not available anymore).

    I am having serious issues trying to alter my old iCloud account with an old non-functioning email to my new apple id with a new email address. The message keeps coming up on all my apple products with my old email (which is not available anymore).

    I have the same problem - it is maddening. I rely on this iPad for work so this is not just an annoyance! The above solutions of changing the appleid on the device or on the website do not work.
    The old email address no longer exists - I haven't used it in a year probably and I no longer have the account.  I logged into the appleid website and there is no trace of the old email address so there is nothing that can be deleted or changed there.  On the iPad there is no trace of the old email address so nothing can be deleted there either. I have updated the iPad software and the same problem comes right back.  Every 2 seconds I am asked to log in using the old non-existent email.  The device is currently useless.
    The only recent change to anything was the addition of an Apple TV device, which was set up using the correct login and password.
    Does anyone have any ideas? The iPad has been backed up to the iCloud so presumably it now won't recognize the current iCloud account? So restoring may notbe an option?

  • Has Apple addressed poor sound quality issues with new 160GB iPod classic?

    I just bought a new 160GB iPod classic, replacing a perfectly good 80GB iPod Video (5.5), thinking that the newer one would be superior to my 3 year old model. I discovered that the sound of the new unit was flat and muddy compared to the older model. I found that the 5th gen iPod video was more "spacial", if that's an appropriate word to use; the bass was more present and more clearly defined, as was the rest of the sonic spectrum. I searched several forums to research this issue and while there were numerous references to this issue, all of the posts I found referred to the original iPod classics (80GB and 160GB) and not the later 120GB classics nor the new 160GB classics like the one I bought. Has Apple done anything to address this issue since the first classics were released or are the new ones still suffering from the same sound quality issues as the original classics?

    Based on your observations here, they apparently have not changed the sound quality since the original 160GB classic. I noticed a clear narrowing of the sound stage (ambiance) between the 5.5G 80Gb and my 6G 160GB. You're describing the same characteristic. I don't own the newest 160GB version and came here today to see if it might have improved the sound quality back to the 5.5 spaciousness. Note that the 5.5G has a higher signal to noise ratio than the 6G, making it difficult for me to enjoy it through efficient balanced armature in ear monitors like the Shure SE530s or Ulimate Ears Triple.Fi 10s.

  • Quality issues with IDVD solved

    Hi All
    RE. Best looking IDVD playback.
    May this help all those stuggling with quality issues with perfect looking Qtime files encoded by IDVD coming out looking crap.
    Simply this: instead of exporting your media from your FCP timeline in H.264 - instead select Motion JPEG A. This is found under your setting options in your Qtime movie/settings export window.
    Your files will export much, much faster than Apple's default setting of H.264, you will also get very smooth playback wihtout any jaggies or nasty artifacts. Files are a larger but, hey, it just looks great.
    Let me know if this works for you - it took me ages to figure this out!
    Best regards
    PostGuy40
    Imac 2.16Ghz intel dual core   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   17"

    Good info. I'll keep this in mind next time.

  • Photo Quality Issues with Pixma MG6220

    I am frustrated.  The first photo printed from this printer was of poor quality.  It was very 'grainy' and 'noisey'.  I printed from the printer itself (put camera card into printer).  I then printed from Picasa, same problem, very poor quality.  It was then a couple of months before I attempted printing again.  I printed from PS Elements 11.  The quality was much improved but not what I expected from this printer.  I finally called tech support, after tweaking every setting I could find.  They essentially blamed my computer, wanted to reinstall the drivers and I need to buy new ink cartridges.  It's NOT my computer.  I'm curious as to why they think it's the drivers.  It very well could be bad cartridges.  The printer was purchased in December (six months ago).  I'm wondering why the photo software would make a difference.  I'm irritated that the people I spoke with seemed completely incurious as to what, exactlly, was wrong with the photos.  It would appear that no on else has had this issue.  The reviews for this printer were very good.  I can't imagine reviewing these images and stating that they are "excellent" as I have read from many reviews.  I'll be more than happy to attach scanned images for review (scanner works fine).  Thank you. 

    Hi,
    Check this for scanned images and originals for reference:
    http://flickr.com/gp/skital/Y9615F
    (you can download full-res versions there as well - it's a bit hidden if you don't know flickr)
    This was using Canon Glossy II photo paper and NOT Canon Ink. I was trying different replacement inks over the time and I had similar results.
    I'm a little bit hesitant with spending more money on this printer, esp. that I had never have this kind of quality issues with my previous Canon printer (MP600) when using non canon inks - I had color issues but never grainess.
    Well, I may try original inks again, but it breaks a deal for this printer.

  • TS2681 quality issues with I pad 3, now on my 4th in 3 weeks

    Quality issues with the new Ipad 3 , now on my 4th  in 3 weeks ,  each time marks  / scraches in the metal case are evident,  not what i expect from apple , unable to e mail direct,  

    One of two things is happening.
    1) You have had an unusual run of bad luck. So, return it and try again.
    2) With all respect, you may be so picky, you'll never be satisfied.
    Matt

  • Image Quality issue with script

    So I recently wrote a simple script to output an image at a bunch of different resolutions. However, I am running into an image quality issue that I don't run into when I do the same thing manually.
    Here is an example image showcasing the image: http://terminalvelocity.ca/temp/notworking.jpg
    As you can see along the top of the model's forhead there is destinct color fragmentation. Which seems very strange.
    Here is the script, it is pretty simple, it asks for a few simple config options. (the above image was created using default settings). It then figures out the correct ratios and loops through doing each resize, saving the image, then reverting the history so each iteration uses the original image data and not the resized version:
    doc = app.activeDocument;
    openFilePath = Folder.selectDialog ("Where do you want the images to be saved?");
    maxSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the maximum length of the long edge? (Image is never upsized) (pixels)", 2800)); 
    minSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the minimum length of the long edge? (pixels)", 100));
    gap = Number(prompt("How much smaller should each image be? (pixels)", 100)); 
    quality = Number(prompt("What quality would you like the JPG exported as (0-12)", 10)); 
    var size;
    var primary;
    var secondary;
    if(doc.width > doc.height){
              primary = doc.width;
              secondary = doc.height;
    }else{
              primary = doc.height;
              secondary = doc.width;
    var ratio = secondary/primary;
    var size = [];
    for(var i = maxSize;i>minSize;i-=gap){
              var  p = i
              var s = i * ratio;
              size.push([p,s]);
    var w;
    var h;
    var n;
    for(var i in size){
              if(doc.width > doc.height){
                        w = n = size[i][0];
                        h = size[i][1];
              }else{
                        w = size[i][1];
                        n= h = size[i][0];
              if(doc.width >= w && doc.height >= h){
                        doc.resizeImage(w,h,null,ResampleMethod.BICUBICSHARPER);
                        jpgFile = new File(openFilePath+"/"+n+".jpeg" )
                        jpgSaveOptions = new JPEGSaveOptions()
                        jpgSaveOptions.embedColorProfile = false
                        jpgSaveOptions.formatOptions =
                        FormatOptions.STANDARDBASELINE
                        jpgSaveOptions.matte = MatteType.NONE
                        jpgSaveOptions.quality = quality
                        app.activeDocument.saveAs(jpgFile, jpgSaveOptions, true,Extension.LOWERCASE);             
                        doc.activeHistoryState = doc.historyStates[doc.historyStates.length-2];
    In comparison, here is an example of an image of the exact same resolution that does not exhibit this issue at all:
    The steps taken to save this image were as follows: http://photography.terminalvelocity.ca/content/images/2012/avery_konrad_6/horizontal/1500. jpg
    Image > Resize > Bicubic Sharper (1500px);
    Save For Web
         Jpeg
         Quality 75
         Optimzed: true
         Progressive: false
         Blur: 0
         Convert to sRGB: true   
    Anyway, as you can see, The manually exported image does not have any of the quality issues that are present within the scripted image. I am pretty new to photoshop scriping so am assuming it has something to do with me missing some sort of option in the save settings. Any help would be swell.
    Also note, this doesn't occur on all images, I usually don't see an issue when using the script, however, something about the tones of this particular photo make it really obvious.
    I am using the latest version of Photoshop CS6 (creative cloud) on Max OSX
    thanks so much!

    I'm on windows find the bicubicsharper does not work well it the image being resized has been highly sharpened all ready. Because of my Photoshop preferences I had to make minor modification to your script. I'm also a bit colorblind so i don't see many color issues so I include a screen capture if what windows does with your image and script.
    var orig_ruler_units = app.preferences.rulerUnits;
    app.preferences.rulerUnits = Units.PIXELS;          // Set the ruler units to PIXELS
    doc = app.activeDocument;
    openFilePath = Folder.selectDialog ("Where do you want the images to be saved?");
    maxSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the maximum length of the long edge? (Image is never upsized) (pixels)", 2800));
    minSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the minimum length of the long edge? (pixels)", 100));
    gap = Number(prompt("How much smaller should each image be? (pixels)", 100));
    quality = Number(prompt("What quality would you like the JPG exported as (0-12)", 10));
    var size;
    var primary;
    var secondary;
    if(doc.width > doc.height){
              primary = doc.width;
              secondary = doc.height;
    }else{
              primary = doc.height;
              secondary = doc.width;
    var ratio = secondary/primary;
    var size = [];
    for(var i = maxSize;i>minSize;i-=gap){
              var  p = i
              var s = i * ratio;
              size.push([p,s]);
    var w;
    var h;
    var n;
    for(var i in size){
              if(doc.width > doc.height){
                        w = n = size[i][0];
                        h = size[i][1];
              }else{
                        w = size[i][1];
                        n= h = size[i][0];
              if(doc.width.value >= w && doc.height.value >= h){
                        doc.resizeImage(w,h,null,ResampleMethod.BICUBICSHARPER);
                        jpgFile = new File(openFilePath+"/"+n+".jpeg" )
                        jpgSaveOptions = new JPEGSaveOptions()
                        jpgSaveOptions.embedColorProfile = false
                        jpgSaveOptions.formatOptions =
                        FormatOptions.STANDARDBASELINE
                        jpgSaveOptions.matte = MatteType.NONE
                        jpgSaveOptions.quality = quality
                        app.activeDocument.saveAs(jpgFile, jpgSaveOptions, true,Extension.LOWERCASE);            
                        doc.activeHistoryState = doc.historyStates[doc.historyStates.length-2];
    app.preferences.rulerUnits = orig_ruler_units;          // Reset units to original settings

  • Recurring quality issues with HP Elitebook 6930p

    Good afternoon to all forumers,
    I am trying to find out if anyone besides me have the same recurring quality issues with HP Elitebook 6930p? Although these issues have all been resolved by HP. I find it very inconvenient since this is a business notebook and these issues have cause me a lot of down time and grievances. A list of my Elite book issues.
    Warped LCD panel causing the latch not to work. (1 time)
    Dead pixels on new LCD panel replacement (1 time).
    Deteriorated touch pad rubber left button, which I don't use. (1 time)
    Keyboard not working. (2 times)
    Screw holding the top sdie switch panel came off on one corner. Reason being, the screw holder cracked (1 time).
    Reading lack cover on the LCD panel cracked on its own. I rarely use this. (1 time).
    Notebook overheating. The cooling element not working properly. (1 time).
    Defective power adapter, loose contact at adapter  (1 time). Replaced within warranty period.
    I do not know whether to term this as` unlucky' or to say that today's HP business notebook has not got the `Quality' a business notebook should have. I have used other business notebook from HP, namely 2 models from the nx series but they are not as bad as the Elitebook except for the same high operating temperature issue.
     Is there any course of action that I can take up with HP Malaysia? Any advice is greatly appreciated.
    Thank you.
    -Keith CK Loo

    Hi, Keith:
    I have a 6930p and was leery about getting one, after reading this link below from the business support forum, but I only paid $499 for it brand new. I couldn't pass up a deal like that.
    http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/Notebook-HP-ProBook-Compaq-Slate/6930p-Quality-Issues/m-p/1066713#M1505...
    I heard that many of the issues you and the others that posted were improved/fixed by HP later on in production. My notebook was built in December of 2010, so it was pretty much the last of the line.
    I have not experienced any problems with mine thus far, after 8 months of light use.  I have tested every component at least once. I know the latch issue was fixed on later models.
    Paul

  • Take long to sync contacts and notes calandario 6800 and with Microsoft Outlook  already have 2 hours and not finish the process please help

    take long to sync contacts and notes calandario 6800 and with Microsoft Outlook
    already have 2 hours and not finish the process please help

    Where error messages are you getting?
    Can you not do both? Send and Receive?
    Check but I think yo have the right setting described here:
    iCloud: Mail server information

  • Quality issues with new Mac Mini 09?

    I've been itching to hit the 'buy' button -- but in reading the many postings about the new Mac Mini, I'm seeing lots of issues with the bluetooth ... *wireless signal* ...
    Is there anyone who's not experiencing any problems?
    Sounds like it may be a hardware issue with connections... the last thing I want.
    My other choice is the 2008 Mac Pro which seems trouble free.
    What do you think?
    Thanks.

    There is a general issue/trend with the new Mini. There are plenty of reports in these forums and the news has begun to hit the wider press; I guess this is more important to a company with only 2-3% desktop share than posts to these forums. I went to the Genius Bar on Saturday and they have now lodged an official bug report with Apple. It looks like the Mini cannot pair with more than one HCI device. So if you pair with the mouse first the keyboard won't work and vice-versa. They don't think the Mini hardware is broken but that we will just have to wait for Apple to fix the firmware.
    Where I do agree is that some issues are OS-X 10.5 related and can therefore affect all Macs. The WiFi has issues where it randomly drops, it doesn't seem able to re-connect at all to channels above 13 and only manually to channels below 12. The system resume function is unreliable. All these started when we moved from 10.4 to 10.5 and so far they have not been addressed. One issue is that there does not appear to be a way for users to log bug reports, except when software crashes. However, the bluetooth issues on the Mac do appear real and are either firmware or hardware related.

  • Frustrated with 70 Hour Weeks: Lazy or Legit Issue

    So for a little over a month, I have been working 70 hour work weeks (I am salaried so no extra pay), and I am becoming very frustrated with the work week due to lack of free time and the fact that I am the only one in the office for countless hours. Most of the extra hours are a result of being understaffed and project deadlines being moved up by several months to a whole year. The 70 hour weeks do not show any signs of ending soon, and I have expressed my concerns to my boss. I usually get a reply that these kind of hours are to be expected for people in IT, and that I should just get use to it. I was wondering how other SpiceHeads feel about long weeks and no extra pay. Are my concerns warranted or am I being lazy with my frustrations with 70 hour work weeks.
    This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

    Has anyone used the Unifi Outdoor AC AP's yet. I just got one in today for install at a Marina tomorrow on Lake Ontario and I can't believe how big this thing is. I've every type of indoor unit they sell and a few of the point to point units but never any outdoor AP's. Here is a picture to get some perspective on the size.
    I was thinking it was maybe a little bigger then some of the large point to point units. Was I ever wrong it's the size of a cinder block face. Thankfully I don't need to worry about space where I'm mounting this but I thought I would post this in case anyone else is looking at these and is wonder size. I will come back tomorrow and post how the install went and how the performance. So far I've got it on my cloud controller and was getting strong signal outside with the unit sitting in my basement.

  • HP Officejet Pro L7590 - print quality issue

    We've had a lot of problems with this unit since day one.  It simply wouldn't work with our XP computers.  Thankfully it does work with our new Windows 7 computer.
    The problem I'm having is that I have to clean the printheads at least once, if not twice, before every print job if it hasn't printed anything recently (even an hour or two).
    Although we've had the printer for a while, it has hardly been used because it wouldn't work with our previous computers (and I gave up trading emails with HP support because the situation just got worse each time we tried something, not better).  The myPrintMileage function says we've printed just over 300 pages (and I can pretty much guarantee that at least 250 of those have been diagnostic pages trying to get it working, not actual print jobs). 
    The only advice I can find on the troubleshooting page is to replace the printhead/s.  Is that really the case?  We have already had to replace ink cartridges before we ever got the printer working.  If we now have to replace one or both printheads this machine is proving very costly to run.  I would be very disappointed to find we had had to replace all four ink cartridges and both printheads before we ever got the machine working properly. 
    I'd appreciate any feedback you can offer on this please.

    I've included a link below to help you troubleshoot rpint quality issues...
    http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docname=bpu03037&tmp_task=solveCategory&lc=en&dlc=en&cc=...
    This document provides some system settings that may help fix the issue.
    Dave M.
    Say Thanks by clicking the Kudos Star in the post that helped you.
    Please mark the post that solves your problem as Accepted Solution.
    I am an HP employee.

  • Did Apple fix the video quality issue in iMovie '09?

    I am a casual video editor and iMovie 08 had the perfect user experience / functionality for what I want to do.
    However, the known video quality issue (throwing away interlaced scan lines) made the result unacceptable since I archive our family video on DVDs. I have been forced to use iMovie HD for that reason. I have tried tricks such as converting the original DV files to AIF and deinterlace prior to import into iMovie08 but that did not seem to work either.
    So does anyone know if Apple fixed the video quality issue in iMovie '09.
    MESSAGE TO APPLE IF YOU ARE LISTENING:
    Please fix the video quality in iMovie09 if not already. Yes, the quality is ok for YouTube or Internet video but for those of us who want simple editing to archive our family video we cannot accept poor video quality. Dropping an interlace field effectively halves the vertical resolution. Thank you.

    Please explain this in more detail when you say Adaptive Deinterlacer. Are you talking about another program? If so, what program and what are the specific steps.
    Also, sounds like you are recommending imovie09. By saying to do the above, are you saying imovie09 still causes you too loose significant quality like imovie08? Are you saying you can use imovie08 or imovie09 with these steps to get high quality video or just imovie09? I guess I just need more specifics on how you do what you are describing and how imovie09 fits into this versus imovie08. I joined this whole discussion trying to figure out if upgrading imovie09 made a difference regarding the whole quality issue. I know it has more features, but I am more concerned about he quality of the video right now. Thanks.

Maybe you are looking for