Query on Unit of issue

Hi,
In the material master (warehouse mgmt1 view), we have two unit of measures defined.
One is base unit of measure and the other is Unit of issue.
1. What is unit of issue and what it's used for?
2. Is it applicable only for materials issued from warehouse-managed storage locations?
Let me know.
Thanks,
Mohit

Hi,
When a quantity is assigned for the first time to a processing method, the unit of measure is calculated as follows:
If the quantity is to be cross-docked, the unit of measure at goods receipt is used. If the assigned quantity cannot be converted to this unit of measure, the cross-docking quantity is displayed in base units of measure.
In the case of all other processing methods, the quantity is displayed in the unit of issue of the issuing site. Sometimes the unit of issue cannot be used, for example in the following cases
The quantity cannot be converted to the unit of issue.
The unit of issue of the issuing site is not known.
The unit of issue of the issuing site is the same as the base unit of measure.
In these cases, the planned unit of issue of the relevant issue document item is displayed. If the assigned quantity cannot be converted to this unit of measure, the quantity for the processing method is displayed in base units of measure.
pls let me know if u need more info

Similar Messages

Unit of issue in COGI

Hi Experts,
I have unit of issue (in BOM and Matl Master) which is Alt UOM, different from Base unit of measure. While doing MFBF, I am getting qty of component in Alt UOM but actually system is withdrawing components in Base Unit of measure only. This is resulting in postprocessing records - COGI in base UOM. What should I do so that system will issue component in Alt UOM.
Thanks
Suresh

Dear,
Do not worry about unot of measure...system will issue the material in the unit you have maintained in BOM. More over whatever the unit you have enetered, systme will calculate the alternate unit qty and updates the stock. Usually MMBE shoews the stock in all units...but material is valuated w.r.t base unit of measure. Hence system willcalcuate the al unit and updates FI documents to updating the stock.
Hence system will calculate the unit conversion you maintained in material master
Can we know what problem you are facing in post processing?

Change/ removal of Unit of Issue in Material master Work scheduling view

Hi,
Is there a way to remove Unit of Issue from Work scheduling view? it is giving error message as "this is being used in BOM". Even if we put deletion indicator also it is showing same error message.
Regards,
R. Srinivasan

Do a CS15 for the material in question and make sure you go in the BOM and select the material and click on delete/remove you can then do this.
I have tested it and it works.
Regards
Adeel

Error when changing unit of Issue in material master

Hi,
When i am trying to change Unit of issue in Qualitymanagement view of a material using MM02 transaction, we got error message - "The unit of issue cannot be changed because the material is used in a BOM-------Mesage no. M3214"
Can anyone suggest what is the reason behind this. ?. how to avoid this error.
Thanks in advance.

HI Aditya,
"The unit of issue cannot be changed because the material is used in a BOM-------Mesage no. M3214"
The reason is that material is used as a component in BOMs with the present unit of issue as a unit in the bom line item.Unless you change that bom line item unit to its base unit ,system will not allow you to change the unit of issue in QM.
First check in which BOMs the material you were changing is used as a component.this you can do in transaction CS15.
then change the unit of measure used for the material in bom line item to base unit of measure.if one only one BOM is there change in CS02.if more BOMS are there do mass change in CS20.
Then try to change the unit o fissue.now system will allow you to do the changes.

Report gives stock in unit of issue

Hi,
Mb52 gives stock in basic unit of measure .
Is any other report where i want stock in unit of issue with list of material.
Regards,
Rajendra D. Sawant

hi,
you can see from mmbe for only one material for different units.
best regards,

Unit of Issue not considered in Excise Register Entries in Std SAP

Dear Experts ,
I have a material Base UoM is KG
i procured 100 KG
the Unit of issue for the same is G(grams)
now the consumption of 100 G was booked
Excise registers shows the following entries :
qty rcvd : 100 ( there is no unit )
qty issued :100
balance : 0
whilst the balance shud be 99 KG
Pls give ur inputs
Regards
Anis

I donot have any problem with reciepts
My problem is with issue .
i have been suggested to use the user exit   J_1I7_USEREXIT_J1I5_VALIDATE
for which the coding needs to be done .
The same was done as under :
FUNCTION J_1I7_USEREXIT_J1I5_VALIDATE.
""Local Interface:
*" IMPORTING
*"     VALUE(RCPTISSRSN) TYPE J_1IPART1-RCPTISSRSN OPTIONAL
*" TABLES
*"      T_MSEG STRUCTURE MSEG OPTIONAL
TABLES
     T_MSEG STRUCTURE MSEG OPTIONAL
tables:j_1ipart1.
data:it_mseg like t_mseg occurs 0 with header line.
if sy-tcode = 'J1I5'.
move-corresponding t_mseg to j_1ipart1.
j_1ipart1-menge = t_mseg-menge.
j_1ipart1-meins = t_mseg-meins.
modify j_1ipart1 ."where mblnr = t_mseg-mblnr and zeile = t_mseg-zeile.
endif.
ENDFUNCTION.
The logic is to put an entry for J_1IPART1-MENGE & J_1IPART1-MEINS from
MSEG-MEINS & MSEG-MEINS instead of the default used in the system ( MSEG-ERFMG & MSEG-ERFME)
But the above doesnt work.
Pls do help.
Regards
Anis

Unit of Issue vs UoM

Hi Gurus
We have a scenario, where in we are maintaining , diff UoM for the Base unit & unit of issue in the material master.
Our legacy team finds it easy to maintain the stock in unit of issue. how will it impact initial stock loading ?
Muthu

Hi
Initial stock is always maintained in the Stock keeping unit that is base UOM.
Unit of issue will be taken only when issue related movements are performed
If you are thisnking to change the UOM now after uplaoding the stock, it may not be possible. You need to remove the stock & then reload it with Unt of issue.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

To change Unit of issue using BAPI

Hi all
CAN ANYONE TELL ME HOW TO CHANGE THE UNIT OF ISSUE OF MATERIAL UNDER General plant data/storage view using BAPI.
Can any one tell me what all things i need to pass to BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA
Thanks

Hi,
Try this sample code for updating the field..The issue_unit will be field to be modified..
PARAMETERS: p_matnr TYPE matnr.
PARAMETERS: p_werks TYPE werks_d.
DATA: header LIKE bapimathead.
DATA: plant LIKE bapi_marc.
DATA: plantx LIKE bapi_marcx.
DATA: return TYPE bapiret2.
header-material = p_matnr.
header-storage_view = 'X'.
plant-plant = p_werks.
<b>plant-issue_unit = 'LB'.</b>
plantx-plant = p_werks.
plantx-issue_unit = 'X'.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA'
     EXPORTING
          headdata   = header
          plantdata = plant
          plantdatax = plantx
     IMPORTING
          return     = return.
IF return-type = 'E'.
WRITE: / 'Error'.
ELSE.
COMMIT WORK.
ENDIF.
Thanks,
Naren

The unit of issue cannot be changed because the material is used in BOM.

Hi Pals
Please could you help with the following:
I have a request to change value in unit of issue field (Work Scheduling tab), current value if ZPC and i need to remove it and leave field blank.
When i delete this value and press enter error message occurs: "The unit of issue cannot be changed because the material is used in a BOM" (Message no. M3214).
I've removed this material from all BOMs at concerns plant level, but this doesn't help.
Under cs15 tcode, SAP still sees deleted BOM history and probably this stops SAP to allow to change unit of issue.
Do you know how to remove BOMs without history. And mainly, how to solve this problem.
Thank you in advance
Regards
Andrey

Hi R.Brahmankar
thank you for support!
you wrote:
Dear,
Please refer OSS note 215970 It will resolve this issue.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar
I searched in note you gave: and there are 3 reports mentioned:
1. ZZITMTC4 - selection report without update option
2. ZZITMTD4 - selection report with update option
3. ZZITMTD5 - selection report per each material with update option
4. ZZITMTDOC - selection report with document entry and update option
To be honest, i don't know how to use those reports...
I searched in GRR3 tcode for such, but no such reports exist.
Please could you advise how to use those reports.
Thank you
Best Regards
Andrey

Unit of Issue to be as of BUoM

Hi Gurus,
I have an issue with regards to unit of issue.
We have the paint with UoM 'L' in leter where as the consumption is in 'ML'. The stores need to issue the material to WIP store with respect to Reservation in L only where as the consumption has to happen in ML.
My user do not want to change the Unit of issue from ML to L manually and want it to be issued in L only. But as the issue unit is already maintained in ML in Material master and in BoM, it is defaulting to ML while transfering to WIP store.
Pls provide a solution where in store issues material in L and consumption happens in ML without any manual changes during goods postings.
We also tried by not maintaining isue unit as ML and mainataing it in BoM only but the error while confirming the order (Consuption) says UoM does not exists. In that case my problem of issuing in L only will be solved.
Rewards follows...
Regards
Shash

Hi,
Go to material master in Site data/ stor.1 view
In general data, we are having base unit of measure and unit of issue, there you can maintain two units.
Maintain, Base unit of measure as ML and unit of issue as L .
Just check it out, it works or not, there you can issue in L and consumption gets booked in ML.
Regards.

Input Ready Query without unit / currency

HI ,
In my input ready query, it is enabling along with the unit / currency. How to show the input ready query without unit / currency
if I use NODIM() function, it is not possible to creating input ready field.
Please suggest me is there any way to create input ready field without unit / currency.
Thanks and regards
Rajesh

HI Hyma,
1.use the currency / unit field in the filter or drilldown
In this case if the query may have more than 2 fileds which are input ready having differnt unit/ currency, for Ex: Amount = Quantity * Rate
Currency for amount and Rate is INR and for Quantity is Tonnes. if I restrict both INR & TO in filter, in the system it will store both currency and unit for amount, rate and quantity.
HI Andrey,
2. 0CURRENCY or any currency IO that you use in ROWS of query
In this case also, if I use only one type of currency/unit as input ready then it is fine,, but in my query I want to use more then one currency/unit at a time.(As above Example)
Please suggest me how to solve this...
Regards
Rajesh

Unit display issue for MDX

Hi,
Following is the issue what I face.
I issue a MDX query against an infocube. There is a calculated measure in the MDX query whose calculation is in the MDX statement itself(e.g. sales value/sales quantity). The result shows the unit of the calculated measure as "EUR KG" rather than "EUR/KG".
If I issue the MDX query against the query built on the same cube(the calculation of the keyfigure is in the bex query this time and not in the MDX statement) I get the proper unit as EUR/KG.
Can anybody suggest how the units can properly be displayed when queried directly against the cube?
Thanks,
Anurag.

Resolved

Multi Select Choice on af:query has severe performance issue

Multi-select choice used with af:query through a view criteria is causing severe performance issue on deselection of "All" checkbox, if the data in the list is around 550 rows. The same component works absolutely fine when used in a form layout.
I can provide you a re-producible test case, if anyone needs it!
***: This is a customer environment issue, and customer is eager to have multi-select in this case. Appreciate any help!

Glimpse of repetitive lines from console for the above scenario:
<DCUtil> <findSpelObject> [2208] DCUtil, returning:oracle.jbo.uicli.binding.JUApplication, for TestSelectChoiceDefaultAMDataControl
<ADFLogger> <begin> Attaching an iterator binding to a datasource
<DCIteratorBinding> <getViewObject> [2209] Resolving VO:TestSelectChoiceDefaultAM._SESSION_SHARED_APPMODULE_NAME_.SessionAM.DeptReadOnly1 for iterator binding:noCtrl_oracle_adfinternal_view_faces_model_binding_FacesCtrlListBinding_59List_60
<DCUtil> <findSpelObject> [2210] DCUtil, RETURNING: <null> for TestSelectChoiceDefaultAM._SESSION_SHARED_APPMODULE_NAME_.SessionAM.DeptReadOnly1
<ADFLogger> <addContextData> Attaching an iterator binding to a datasource
<ADFLogger> <addContextData> Get LOV list
<ADFLogger> <begin> Get LOV list
<DCUtil> <findSpelObject> [2211] DCUtil, returning:oracle.jbo.uicli.binding.JUApplication, for TestSelectChoiceDefaultAMDataControl
<ADFLogger> <begin> Attaching an iterator binding to a datasource
<DCIteratorBinding> <getViewObject> [2212] Resolving VO:TestSelectChoiceDefaultAM._SESSION_SHARED_APPMODULE_NAME_.SessionAM.DeptReadOnly1 for iterator binding:noCtrl_oracle_adfinternal_view_faces_model_binding_FacesCtrlListBinding_123List_124
<DCUtil> <findSpelObject> [2213] DCUtil, RETURNING: <null> for TestSelectChoiceDefaultAM._SESSION_SHARED_APPMODULE_NAME_.SessionAM.DeptReadOnly1
<ADFLogger> <addContextData> Attaching an iterator binding to a datasource
<ADFLogger> <addContextData> Get LOV list
.....many times followed by
<ADFLogger> <addContextData> Attaching an iterator binding to a datasource
<ADFLogger> <addContextData> Get LOV list
<ADFLogger> <begin> Get LOV list
<ADFLogger> <addContextData> Get LOV list
<ADFLogger> <begin> Get LOV list
<ADFLogger> <addContextData> Get LOV list
<ADFLogger> <begin> Get LOV list
<ADFLogger> <addContextData> Get LOV list
<ADFLogger> <begin> Get LOV list
...many times

Query Only form having issue

I have a simmilar situation here.
Am using a form which has 2 non-DB fields on the canvas and two DB fields on null canvas. While fetching the record I want to show derived values in Non-DB fields based on DB records. So i used Post query.
Now every time it ask me 'Do you want to save your records?' when I hit F4.
Also If i made a Form function with function parameter Query_only = 'Y' . When I hit Ctl+F11 it says you cannot updtate this record. and stuck on those two fields.
Am using Set_Record_Query_Status in post_query but still facing the same issue. Do you have any solution here?
Thanks,
Adi

Adi,
Do you have the Non-DB items in the same Data Block as your DB Fields? Ideally, you should place the non-db items in a Control Block. Another alternative would be to make your non-db items "Display" items. Both will prevent Forms from registerting changes when you Post-Query data into the non-Db items.
Hope this helps.
Craig...

Query In SP runs 10x slower than straight query - NOT Parameter Sniffing Issue

Hi Everyone,
I have a real mystery on my hands that appears to be a parameter sniffing issue with my SP but I think is not. I have tried every parameter sniffing workaround trick in the book ( local variables, option recompile, with recompile, optimize for variables,UNKNOWN,
table hints, query hints, MAXDOP, etc.) I have dropped indexes/recreated indexes, updated statistics, etc. I have restored a copy of the DB to 2 different servers ( one with identical HW specs as the box having the issue, one totally different ) and the SP
runs fine on those 2, no workarounds needed. Execution plans are identical on all boxes. When I run a profiler on the 2 different boxes however, I see that on the server having issues, the Reads are around 8087859 while the other server with identical HW,
the reads are 10608. Not quite sure how to interpret those results or where to look for answers. When the sql server service is restarted on the server having issues and the sp is run, it runs fine for a time ( not sure how long ) and then goes back to its
snail pace speed. Here is the profile trace:
Here is the stored procedure. The only modifications I made were the local variables to eliminate the obvious parameter sniffing issues and I added the WITH NOLOCK hints:
/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[EC_EMP_APPR_SIGNATURE_SEL_TEST]    Script Date: 12/03/2014 08:06:01 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[EC_EMP_APPR_SIGNATURE_SEL_TEST]    Script Date: 12/02/2014 22:24:45 ******/
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[EC_EMP_APPR_SIGNATURE_SEL_TEST]
@EMPLOYEE_ID varchar(9) ,
@OVERRIDE_JOB_CODE varchar(8),
@OVERRIDE_LOCATION_CODE varchar(8),
@OVERRIDE_EST_CODE varchar(8),
@OVERRIDE_EMP_GROUP_CODE varchar(8)
AS
set NOCOUNT ON
declare
@EMPLOYEE_ID_LOCAL varchar(9),
@OVERRIDE_JOB_CODE_LOCAL varchar(8),
@OVERRIDE_LOCATION_CODE_LOCAL varchar(8),
@OVERRIDE_EST_CODE_LOCAL varchar(8),
@OVERRIDE_EMP_GROUP_CODE_LOCAL varchar(8)
set @EMPLOYEE_ID_LOCAL = @EMPLOYEE_ID
set @OVERRIDE_JOB_CODE_LOCAL = @OVERRIDE_JOB_CODE
set @OVERRIDE_LOCATION_CODE_LOCAL = @OVERRIDE_LOCATION_CODE
set @OVERRIDE_EST_CODE_LOCAL = @OVERRIDE_EST_CODE
set @OVERRIDE_EMP_GROUP_CODE_LOCAL = @OVERRIDE_EMP_GROUP_CODE
select 3 as SIGNATURE_ID
from EC_EMPLOYEE_POSITIONS p
where p.EMPLOYEE_ID = @EMPLOYEE_ID_LOCAL
and DATEADD(dd, 0, DATEDIFF(dd, 0, GETDATE())) between p.POSITION_START_DATE and ISNULL(p.POSITION_END_DATE, convert(datetime, '47121231', 112))
and (dbo.lpad(isnull(p.job_code,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(p.location_code,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(p.ESTABLISHMENT_CODE,'<N/A>'), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(p.EMP_GROUP_CODE,''), 8, ' '))
in
(select (dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.REPORTING_JOB_CODE,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.REPORTING_LOCATION_CODE,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.REPORTING_ESTABLISHMENT_CODE,'<N/A>'), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.REPORTING_EMP_GROUP_CODE,''),
8, ' '))
  from EC_POSITIONS ep
  where DATEADD(dd, 0, DATEDIFF(dd, 0, GETDATE())) between ep.POSITION_EFFECT_DATE
   and ISNULL(ep.POSITION_TERM_DATE, convert(datetime, '47121231', 112))
   and (dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.job_code,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.location_code,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.ESTABLISHMENT_CODE,'<N/A>'), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.EMP_GROUP_CODE,''), 8, ' '))
   = (dbo.lpad(isnull(@OVERRIDE_JOB_CODE_LOCAL,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(@OVERRIDE_LOCATION_CODE_LOCAL,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(@OVERRIDE_EST_CODE_LOCAL,'<N/A>'), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(@OVERRIDE_EMP_GROUP_CODE_LOCAL,''),
8, ' ')))
union
select 4 as SIGNATURE_ID
from EC_EMPLOYEE_POSITIONS p
where p.EMPLOYEE_ID = @EMPLOYEE_ID_LOCAL
and DATEADD(dd, 0, DATEDIFF(dd, 0, GETDATE())) between p.POSITION_START_DATE and ISNULL(p.POSITION_END_DATE, convert(datetime, '47121231', 112))
and (dbo.lpad(isnull(p.job_code,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(p.location_code,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(p.ESTABLISHMENT_CODE,'<N/A>'), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(p.EMP_GROUP_CODE,''), 8, ' '))
in
(select (dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.REPORTING_JOB_CODE,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.REPORTING_LOCATION_CODE,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.REPORTING_ESTABLISHMENT_CODE,'<N/A>'), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.REPORTING_EMP_GROUP_CODE,''),
8, ' '))
  from EC_POSITIONS ep with (NOLOCK)
  where DATEADD(dd, 0, DATEDIFF(dd, 0, GETDATE())) between ep.POSITION_EFFECT_DATE
   and ISNULL(ep.POSITION_TERM_DATE, convert(datetime, '47121231', 112))
   and (dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.job_code,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.location_code,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.ESTABLISHMENT_CODE,'<N/A>'), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.EMP_GROUP_CODE,''), 8, ' '))
   in
(select (dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.REPORTING_JOB_CODE,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.REPORTING_LOCATION_CODE,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.REPORTING_ESTABLISHMENT_CODE,'<N/A>'), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.REPORTING_EMP_GROUP_CODE,''),
8, ' '))
  from EC_POSITIONS ep with (NOLOCK)
  where DATEADD(dd, 0, DATEDIFF(dd, 0, GETDATE())) between ep.POSITION_EFFECT_DATE
   and ISNULL(ep.POSITION_TERM_DATE, convert(datetime, '47121231', 112))
   and (dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.job_code,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.location_code,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.ESTABLISHMENT_CODE,'<N/A>'), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(ep.EMP_GROUP_CODE,''), 8, ' '))
   = (dbo.lpad(isnull(@OVERRIDE_JOB_CODE_LOCAL,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(@OVERRIDE_LOCATION_CODE_LOCAL,''), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(@OVERRIDE_EST_CODE_LOCAL,'<N/A>'), 8, ' ') + dbo.lpad(isnull(@OVERRIDE_EMP_GROUP_CODE_lOCAL,''),
8, ' '))))
order by SIGNATURE_ID
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated by anyone. I have no more tricks left in my toolbox and am starting to think its either the hardware or the database engine itself that is at fault.
Max

fast server:
SQL Server parse and compile time:
   CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
   CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
   CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
   CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
   CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
   CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
Table 'EC_POSITIONS'. Scan count 3, logical reads 10450, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
Table 'EC_EMPLOYEE_POSITIONS'. Scan count 2, logical reads 6, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
SQL Server Execution Times:
   CPU time = 3343 ms, elapsed time = 3460 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
   CPU time = 3343 ms, elapsed time = 3460 ms.
Slow server:
SQL Server parse and compile time:
   CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
   CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
   CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
   CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
   CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
   CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
Table 'EC_POSITIONS'. Scan count 3, logical reads 10450, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
Table 'EC_EMPLOYEE_POSITIONS'. Scan count 2, logical reads 6, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
SQL Server Execution Times:
   CPU time = 37875 ms, elapsed time = 38295 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
   CPU time = 37875 ms, elapsed time = 38295 ms.
Big diff in server execution times....

Query on Unit of issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for