Query regarding condition type value calculation in VA05

Dear Gurus,
We had maintained one condition type Z*** where we had declared the condition type as follows:
Condition class - Prices
Calculation type - Quantity
Plus/Minus - A (positive).
We had maintained the condition table as :
Price = 200 USD per 10 EA
Lower limit = uppler limit = 0.
When we are calculating the price in the sales document, the system is taking the price of 10 units as 200 USD correctly.
But in VA05 screen, the confirmed net value for 10 units is shown as 10*200 = 2000 USD which is wrong.
Can anybody throw a light on how the confirmed net value for VA05 screen is calculated.
regards,
Krishna

If it is representing the value of the condition type, then it is a new field customised by your technical team. Standard VA05 doesnot represent the value of any condition type. So please check with your developer, may be there is a problem in their program.

Similar Messages

  • Manual Excise condition type with calculation type as FIXED AMOUNT

    Dear Gurus,
    I have used a manual excise condition (JMAN) in my pricing procedure the difference is that I've changed its calcultaion type to FIXED AMOUNT.
    And in the same pricing procedure I have also got a percentage based Excise condition (ZEXC).
    And in any transaction either of the one that is JMAN or ZEXC will be used.
    The Manual Excise condition is used basically when the raw material sale takes place. The requirement is as such that they should be able to enter the duty value in INR and not in percentage. Please go through the example below
    *(For Example I am procuring raw material of 100 kg worth 10000 at 8% of excise duty. Excise duty will be 800 for 10000rs. So it will be 8 rs per KG.
    And now suppose I am utilizing 80 kg for production and want to sell remaining 20 kg. the Excise duty charged should be 160 rs. considering the rate per unit is 8rs.)*
    In this case user wants to enter the value in INR and not in percentage.
    And normally for the finished goods the percentage based condition is used.
    Now what my issue is that how will I copy the value from JMAN to ZEXC at the raw material sale. otherwise my finished good sales is happening without any problem.
    For this should I use any routine to copy the values from ZMAN to ZEXC??
    Or rather is it possible that I could copy values from a condition type whose calculation type is FIXED AMOUNT to other condition whose calculation type is percentage.
    How should I go ahead with this??
    Please guide me.
    Any answers??
    Cant Do it this way??
    Thanks & Regards
    Anand.k
    Edited by: anand k on Jul 8, 2009 6:38 AM
    Edited by: anand k on Jul 8, 2009 1:04 PM

    Check the condtion value in condition type UTXJ . If the JMOD value is 10% of UTXJ then assessable value should have been maintained for the Material and Plant combination in J1ID. This is due to Routine 351 maintined in pricing procedure for the condition type UTXJ
    check and confirm
    Senthils

  • How to stop non statistical condition type value from updating total amount

    Gurus,
    Can any body explain me how to do following setting,
    How to Stop non statistical condition type value from updating Total Amount
    Regards,
    Sai

    Dear Sai,
    You need to make that condition type as Statistical one
    Go to SPRO - Sales and Distr. - Basic Functions - Pricing - Define and Assign Pricing Proc - Maintain Pricing Proc - Control Date
    Select the proc. - select the condition type and activate the  check box Statistical
    This will show the amount of the condition but will not consider for the net value calculation
    Hope this will help you
    regards,
    Sagar

  • JMOD condition type value should be always rounded up instead of commercial

    Hi Helpers,
    I need one clarification from you all based on your expertise,
    1. JMOD condition type value should be always rounded up instead of commercial.
    2. i have been already made rounding up in the condition type JMOD in the transaction V/06. but unfortunatly not working.
    3. after that we found that there is configuration change in spro (company code setting in the indai taxation-CIN) in the Logistic general> tax on goods movement>india> basic setting> company code setting for the commercialrounding, but the same is  already ennabled with SD rounding IND.
    Need your expertise on this.How shall we make it round up always for JMOD condition value. below is an example for your further analysis.
    Example: if values UTXJ is : 8,913.40 and JMOD will be calculated based on UTXJ as 10% thats is 891.34.
    Actually this should be 892 as per the requiremen.t

    I just recently rolled off a project in Europe that had an issue similar to this.  We were having rounding issues as a result of %  discounts. 
    However, we did come up with a solution that is provided by SAP. 
    Please review OSS note 80183 on SAP rounding and the solutions provided within the note.
    I hope this helps.
    Kind Regards,
    Jason

  • MM Pricing Condition Type values in Condition Tab updation while CHANGE PO.

    Hi,
    The process of PO creation and PO change is through inbound IDOC posting.
    I created a PO with configured MM pricing procedure.
    While creating PO, the PO is created as required with different Condition Type value break-ups [PBXX, Discount, Surcharge etc] in the PO as required via Inbound IDOC processing.
    While CHANGING the same PO, the Condition Type break-ups [i.e. pricing related values] in the PO are NOT changing in the PO via Inbound IDOC processing.
    What needs to be done to update the Condition Type break-ups in the PO while changing PO through IDOC processing process?
    This problem is not occured while manual / on-line changing of PO valueS and saving the PO & exists through IDOC processing method ONLY.
    Thanks in Adv,
    RK

    Hi
    Try this function module
    FM RV_CHECK_CONDITION_VALUE
    Regards
    Hareesh Menon

  • Pricing : Condition type value need tog get from the lowest of 4 other cond

    Hi,
    I have one requirement in one pricing procedure.
    I need to calculate condition value of one condition type from the lowest value of other 4 condition tyeps. These condition types values are not defined as a subtotal.
    So if I decide to write a formula on condition values, is there
    any way to select these values and choose the lowest of them?
    Please also advice if there is any other way such as condition exclusion
    or so?
    Thanks and regards,
    Anand

    Anand,
    As you have mentioned you can use condition exclusion for such a requirement.
    here is a detailed description of how you can achieve this: use the menu path IMG> Sales & Distribution> Basic Functions> Pricing> Condition Exclusion> Condition exclusion for group of conditions.
    When you execute this IMG acitivity you get a window with three options
    1.Define Condition Exclusion Groups
    2.Assign condition types to the exclusion groups
    3.Maintain condition exclusion for pricing procedures
    We will use these three options one by one, we start with the first
    1. Define an exclusion group, lets say EX01 and give a description
    2 Assign the four condition types that you want to compare to this exclusion group under this option
       lets say EX01 ZK01
                   EX01 ZK02
                   EX01 ZK03
                   EX01 Zk04
    3. under this third step, select the pricing procedure that you are working on and from the left margin click on 'Exclusion'. click on 'New Entries' and make the following entries (example)
             Sno.   Cpr         ExGr1
              10      A            EX01                leave ExGr2 blank, Save your entries
    Check if your purpose has been met or not. Do give your feedback
    Regards,
    PATHIK

  • Condition type value not update in sales order

    Hello Guru's
    As per the  sales order in VA01 the condition type value i.e surcharge value is not updating in sales order.
    But I have maintain the condition record(Surcharge)also and in Condition technique I have checked every thing is correct .
    please find below I have attached the Screen short .
    Please give me solution Asap.

    Hi Sukdev,
    Have you checked the respective pricing procedure for From and To reference step maintained against the condition type ZSUR?
    Regards,
    T.R.S.Praveen

  • MM Condition Types values flow COPA

    Dear Gurus,
           My client requirement is MM Condition Types Values Should flow to COPA like SD to COPA. I had seen a screen that KE4IM is there we can map our COPA Value Field and MM Condition Types. But I am not sure that values flow to COPA, Because No document will be generated in FI or other while doing PO.
    Pl suggest me how can I fullfill this requirement.
    Regards,
    Balaji Bhonsle.

    Hi,
    If you read config doco for KE4IM you will find a statement:
    "It is also possible to transfer conditions from MM to update billing data in pooled payment in the IS Retail system. These are transferred according to the same rules as SD conditions."
    So KE4IM is only used in IS Retail. Are you IS Retail?
    If not you probably want to bring conditions from purchase orders to CO-PA.
    I agree with Ajay except for point 1.
    You can actualy trigger CO-PA posting during goods receipt (and invoice receipt) for PO.
    In order to achive it you need to activate "Purchase Accounting" in MM.
    SPRO -> Marterials Management -> Valuation and Account Assignment -> Account Determination -> Account Determination without Wizard -> Purchase Account Management
    Please read doco for Purchasing Account. In a nutshell when you activate it system will post addtional line item for GR and IR:
    Purchasing account and Purchasing Offseting account for value of purchased nmaterial and also for delivery costs.
    In table T030: Purchase account(EIN), purchase offsetting account (EKG), freight purchase account (FRE).
    Define EIN and FRE as cost elements and map to profitability segment in OKB9. Leave EKG as P&L account (no cost element).
    Then map cost elements to value fields in COPA.
    Done.
    Cheers,
    Szymon

  • How to change the manual condition type value in change sales order BAPI

    Hi All,
    My scenario here is, i want to either add/change the manual condition type value during change of SO.
    When i'm trying to pass the  order_conditions_in and  order_conditions_inx tables in  'BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE'.
    Condition type is coming at item level but the value is setting to zero. Pls. help if anyone has any idea how to handle this.

    Siva,
       I guess you posted in Wrong Thread. You need to post in WAS section.
       check for any BAPI's available in CRM.
    Nagesh Ganisetti.

  • Is it possibale statistical condition type value at FI GL account.

    Dear Expert,
    Hi I have a requirment like:  Add new manual condition types at pricing porcedure level.
    When I am creating SO these condition types value wont calculate in net value but that value needs to flow in to respective G/L account.
    How we can map this requirement at Pricing Procedure level.
    Can you please suggest.

    Hi Ranganayakulu,
    Yes, it is possible. Did you try to search in the forum. The answer is already provided in one of blog of SCN (" DOC-29788" in google).
    Please search and let us know.

  • Condition Type - Values getting changed at billing

    Hii All
    I have a header condition which is set up as group condition at header level. When an amount is entered at the header level it gets proportionately distributed among the line items. This is fine.
    Problem comes when a line item is completely shorted (i.e. delivery quantity becomes 0) then in the billing the header condition value also get reduced.
    What setting needs to be done so that the header condition value does not get affected.
    Current setting of condition type is as follows:
    Condition Class: A
    Calculation Type: B
    Condition Category: Blank
    Copy Control from delivery to billing is marked as 'G'
    Pls do let me know if there is a feasible solution for the same.
    Many Thanks
    Gaurav Manocha

    Dear customer,
    What you are experiencing with Fixed Amount Header conditions is stand-    
    ard behaviour. Please see below Notes:                                     
    876617 FAQ: Header conditions / Header condition screen                    
    317112 Behavior of conditions w/ calculation rule B changed                
    485740 Conditions with fixed amount in copy activities                                                                               
    To achieve what you wish (absolute amount), solution is in the below       
    Notes:                                                                     
    84605 Transfer absolute amount condition to billing doc.                  
    25020 Value changes during over/underdelivery                             
    25144 Freight conditions during milestone billing                         
    But I guess that there are many threads with the same problem.
    At first please search for old threads and solutions.
    I hope that the information are helpful.
    regards
    Claudia

  • Condition type value updation using characteristic value in sales order

    Hi Experts,
    We are implementing SAP for one of our Spain client. In that one of the Legal requirements is, whenever they are selling the finished products to domestic customers who contain OIL as one of the component then, some additional cost needs to be calculated and collected from customer and which needs to be paid back to Spain Government every month on Region basis.
           If OIL is not a component to produce the finished product then, not required to charge the customer additionally.
    The OIL content used to produce every finished product will vary based on product characteristic value. Meaning, for some finished product the OIL used will be 2.2 KG and for some products it will be 3.5, 4.3 KG and etc.
    Since various combinations of products are available for the client, during sales order creation we are planning to update some special characteristic which the data flow from u201CVariant Tableu201D. In the variant table we are going to maintain the OIL Quantity required making finished product.
    But we are not sure how to activate a new condition type with the value fetched in the special characteristic. This new condition type needs to be activated based on this characteristic value and multiplied with total order quantity and price to charge from customer.
    Example, the special characteristic fetched the value of 2.2 KG based on variant table. Total Order quantity is 10 PC and charge is 0.06 EURO per KG. in this case, (2.2 x 10 ) x 0.06 EURO = 1.32 EURO
    I need the expert opinion how to activate the new condition type based on characteristic value and achieve the above requirement.
    Thanks in advance.
    Warm Regards,
    VEL

    Hello,
    I have replicated the whole requirememt in IDES and getting the price calculation as needed but the only issue with the Conversion factor for the condition type. Either you need to maintian the conv factor in material master or need to enter manually for the condition type in SO. Some how you have to maintain the conversion factor to calculate the price for the condition type in different unit.
    For easy of understanding Lets make the whole requirement in 2 parts
    Part - 1
    Oil qty calculation. For convenience sake I have taken oil qty also in TO
    1) Created a num char OIL_QTY1 with length 9 and decimal places 5 and UOM as TO
    2) Created Variant table to infer the OIL qty in TO per piece of finished prod ( This oil qty data may be depends on various factors). For certain Finished products the oil qty may be 0 or blank
    3) Created a REF char SO_QTY  to pull the SO qty to configuration and add this char in class 300(Table:VBAP,Field :KWMENG)
    4) Created another char SO_OIL_QTY  (Num with length 9 and decimal places 5 and UOM as TO)
    5) Created a PROCEDURE say PROC_SO_OIL_QTY with code
    *$self.SO_OIL_QTY = $self.OIL_QTY1 * $self.SO_QTY*
    6) Create another PROCEDURE as mentioned earlier with modified code
    $SELF.A_VARCOND = 'TEST_001' if OIL_QTY1 specified,
    $SET_PRICING_FACTOR ($SELF,A_VARCOND,'TEST_001', SO_OIL_QTY)
    Note: Maintain proper seq of the procedures in profile. The Qty cal proc should be before the price related procedures.
    PART-2
    1) For the condition type maintained 60 EUR per TO (0.06 EUR per KG)
    Now if you create SO for the Finished product of 10 PC
    the Char values will be
    OIL_QTY1  = 0.00022 TO (inferred from Variant table th proc)
    SO_QTY    = 10
    SO_OIL_QTY = 0.0022 TO
    Get into conditions tab
    Here Condition type ZSIG will be displayed as error with Amount 60 EUR per TO and condition value will be blank. Just enter value 1 in the col NumC and CCon fields.
    Now the Condition value will appear as 1.32 EUR.
    Hope this gives some more clarity
    Regards
    Brahmaji D

  • Creation of a new Formula Routine for condition base value calculation

    hello people,
    i am stuck up in a situation where SAP has itself said that nothing can be done.
    but i know you all can guide me to some way or the other
    see, the scenario is like this
    1. i have to calculate the base value for a pricing condition.
    which will follow the formula
    net value + excise duty + freight
    2. in standard routines two things are normally bieng used
    xkwert for the value that has to be finally calculated(taking reference of routine 004)
    komp-netwr for the net value
    3. i have to calculate the excise duty by adding up all the base values of existing pricing conditions like JMOP, JEC1 etc that i have which i saw in internal table
    XKOMV on debugging
    4. now freight is to be calculated from all the values of condition types that are in KOMP which is a structure and no internal table is defined in standard main program
    now ppl
    can you guide me by looking at the standard program
    what is this xkwert field and where it is assigning the value.
    how to get field from other structure and table.
    please guide as to how to approach the problem.
    thanks and regards
    Nitin

    HI,
    the scenario u r talking abt is condition based value formuls of VOFM transaction.
    here the data is retrieved as 'X' structures and will hold normal tables with respective names. and in this case all the pricing data is in KOMV ie XKOMV
    Final amount including tax
    form frm_kond_basis_004.
      xkwert = komp-netwr + komp-mwsbp.
    endform.
    always calulation is done in xkwert field and final value is stoerd in xkomv.
    *.................. text ............................................. *
    Condition base value formula to get the assessable value of the     *
    saleable material from j_1iassval. If the value is not maintained   *
    then the selling price will be taken as the base                    *
    TABLES: J_1IASSVAL.
    DATA XXKOMV LIKE KOMV .
    XXKOMV = XKOMV.
    SELECT SINGLE * FROM J_1IASSVAL WHERE J_1IWERKS = KOMP-WERKS AND
                                         J_1IMATNR = KOMP-MATNR.
    IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
        IF J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALNDP NE 0.
        XKWERT = J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALNDP * KOMP-MGLME / 1000.
        ENDIF.
        IF J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALASS NE 0.
        XKWERT = J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALASS * KOMP-MGLME / 1000.
        ENDIF.
    ELSE.
       XKWERT = XXKOMV-KAWRT .
    ENDIF .
    XKOMV = XXKOMV .
    ENDFORM.
    and as far as ur  req select allthe condition type data and sum and take the average value and pass it.

  • Condition Type Value

    Hi All,
    We have a manual condition type ZP00, the value(2500) for this condition type is populted through file.
    In the sales order it is taking as 25000.
    i.e multipl of 10 (2500*10=25000).
    What could be the problem?
    We are creating the sales order through BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2.
    with regards
    Azeez Mohd

    Hi,
    If you pricing calculation involves two currencies (Doc currency is different than condition record currency), system does exchange rate calculation.  During that time, it refers TCURF-FFACT.  Please check if it is 10 for you.
    For ex.,
    Extype From currTo curr  Valid from    FFACT     TFACT
    P     COP     EUR     79969069     10     1
    P     COP     MXN     79969069     10     1
    P     COP     USD     79959898     10     1
    P     IDR     ARS     79969069     10     1
    P     IDR     BRL     79969069     10     1
    P     IDR     EUR     79969069     10     1
    P     IDR     MXN     79969069     10     1
    P     IDR     USD     79959898     10     1
    P     VEB     USD     79959898     10     1
    PS     COP     ARS     79969069     10     1
    PS     COP     EUR     79969069     10     1
    PS     COP     MXN     79969069     10     1
    PS     COP     USD     79959898     10     1
    PS     COP     USD     79969069     10     1
    PS     IDR     USD     79959898     10     1
    PS     VEB     ARS     79969069     10     1
    PS     VEB     EUR     79969069     10     1
    PS     VEB     MXN     79969069     10     1
    PS     VEB     USD     79959898     10     1
    PS     VEB     USD     79969069     10     1
    Regards,
    P Gomatheeswaran

  • Condition type and calculation schema

    Hi,
    I would need to set up a condition type and set this into a calculation schema.
    The condition type is a kind of tax. (It must be percentage.)
    The tax amount increases the cost, asset value or stock value so the NET amount must be summed up with this tax amount and posted in the GR.
    Please let me know how to set up this condition type and how to set up the calculation scheme so that NET amount and tax amount could be posted in the MIGO.
    When creating a PO line itme with w material I would like to be able to set the NET amount there.
    When lookint at the Condition tab of the line item in the po I would like to see the
    NET amount
    The tax percentage calculated
    The total of these.
    In the MIGO I need to post the total.
    Thanks in advance,
    Agnes

    Hi,
       The option is available with Transportation Management in standard using Multi-dimensional calculation type. As of my knowledge, the full functionality is not available without TM, as there is no option to assign the scale type in MM.
        If you want to map the same scenario in MM without TM, then you may go for development. You may create a new Z table and maintain the kilometers and rate per km for each vendor and ship to party (customer number for the receiving plant). Create custom routine to pull the price (distance * rate per km) from the z table and calculate the total price based on the calculation.
       If the kilometers / route is changeable for each PO, then you may add the distance field in PO.
    Regards,
    AKPT

Maybe you are looking for