Condition Type - Values getting changed at billing

Hii All
I have a header condition which is set up as group condition at header level. When an amount is entered at the header level it gets proportionately distributed among the line items. This is fine.
Problem comes when a line item is completely shorted (i.e. delivery quantity becomes 0) then in the billing the header condition value also get reduced.
What setting needs to be done so that the header condition value does not get affected.
Current setting of condition type is as follows:
Condition Class: A
Calculation Type: B
Condition Category: Blank
Copy Control from delivery to billing is marked as 'G'
Pls do let me know if there is a feasible solution for the same.
Many Thanks
Gaurav Manocha

Dear customer,
What you are experiencing with Fixed Amount Header conditions is stand-
ard behaviour. Please see below Notes:
876617 FAQ: Header conditions / Header condition screen
317112 Behavior of conditions w/ calculation rule B changed
485740 Conditions with fixed amount in copy activities
To achieve what you wish (absolute amount), solution is in the below
Notes:
84605 Transfer absolute amount condition to billing doc.
25020 Value changes during over/underdelivery
25144 Freight conditions during milestone billing
But I guess that there are many threads with the same problem.
At first please search for old threads and solutions.
I hope that the information are helpful.
regards
Claudia

Similar Messages

How to change the manual condition type value in change sales order BAPI

Hi All,
My scenario here is, i want to either add/change the manual condition type value during change of SO.
When i'm trying to pass the order_conditions_in and order_conditions_inx tables in 'BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE'.
Condition type is coming at item level but the value is setting to zero. Pls. help if anyone has any idea how to handle this.

Siva,
I guess you posted in Wrong Thread. You need to post in WAS section.
check for any BAPI's available in CRM.
Nagesh Ganisetti.

VPRS condition type not getting computed while retro billing.

Dear All,
I have an issue while generation of Reto billing using the T.Code : VFRB.While running VFRB the values are getting computed correctly and the supplimentary debit / credit note gets created.
But the values for the condition type VPRS is not getting computed and getting transfered to CO-PA.
On pricing analysis agaist VPRS i am getting the message (Condition ignored (requirement 004 not fulfilled)).
The Item category used is TAN and the Determine cost Indicator is marked.Also while doing a sales invoice the VPRS condition type is getting computed and the value is posted in CO - PA.
What would be the reason for the error .Could some one suggest a solution .Kindlye help.
Regards,
K.Vivek

Hello vivek,
this is usually caused by userexit. Please check userexit_pricing_prepare_tkomp userexit_number_range using in rv60afzz.
Best regards,
Ivano.

MM Pricing Condition Type values in Condition Tab updation while CHANGE PO.

Hi,
The process of PO creation and PO change is through inbound IDOC posting.
I created a PO with configured MM pricing procedure.
While creating PO, the PO is created as required with different Condition Type value break-ups [PBXX, Discount, Surcharge etc] in the PO as required via Inbound IDOC processing.
While CHANGING the same PO, the Condition Type break-ups [i.e. pricing related values] in the PO are NOT changing in the PO via Inbound IDOC processing.
What needs to be done to update the Condition Type break-ups in the PO while changing PO through IDOC processing process?
This problem is not occured while manual / on-line changing of PO valueS and saving the PO & exists through IDOC processing method ONLY.
Thanks in Adv,
RK

Hi
Try this function module
FM RV_CHECK_CONDITION_VALUE
Regards
Hareesh Menon

Pricing : Condition type value need tog get from the lowest of 4 other cond

Hi,
I have one requirement in one pricing procedure.
I need to calculate condition value of one condition type from the lowest value of other 4 condition tyeps. These condition types values are not defined as a subtotal.
So if I decide to write a formula on condition values, is there
any way to select these values and choose the lowest of them?
Please also advice if there is any other way such as condition exclusion
or so?
Thanks and regards,
Anand

Anand,
As you have mentioned you can use condition exclusion for such a requirement.
here is a detailed description of how you can achieve this: use the menu path IMG> Sales & Distribution> Basic Functions> Pricing> Condition Exclusion> Condition exclusion for group of conditions.
When you execute this IMG acitivity you get a window with three options
1.Define Condition Exclusion Groups
2.Assign condition types to the exclusion groups
3.Maintain condition exclusion for pricing procedures
We will use these three options one by one, we start with the first
1. Define an exclusion group, lets say EX01 and give a description
2 Assign the four condition types that you want to compare to this exclusion group under this option
   lets say EX01 ZK01
               EX01 ZK02
               EX01 ZK03
               EX01 Zk04
3. under this third step, select the pricing procedure that you are working on and from the left margin click on 'Exclusion'. click on 'New Entries' and make the following entries (example)
         Sno.   Cpr         ExGr1
          10      A            EX01                leave ExGr2 blank, Save your entries
Check if your purpose has been met or not. Do give your feedback
Regards,
PATHIK

Statistical condition types not getting displayed in invoice

We have configured the tax collected at source (TCS) condition types and make them as statistical in the pricing procedure. Now, the issue is when we are using them the values for these condition types are getting calculated correctly as the total value is correct but in the invoice their individual values are not getting displayed.
In the analysis also we can see that the condition records are found but being statistical condition they should get displayed in the invoice as only the correct total value will not serve the purpose, please help
Thanks & regards
Puneet Agrawal

Hi
Keep a break-point (hard) in these program lines and debug and see that whether the condition type(KSCHL) related to Taxes is appearing here or not.
If the condition type for taxes is coming then you can print the taxes.
First check the related condition type for Taxes in T685 table and see here in the code.
<b>Reward points for useful Answers</b>
Regards
Anji

VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order

Hi All,
I have a case where VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order that has been created with respect to the billing document.
When the pricing conditions are being copied from invoice it is getting copied but later it is getting deleted in the include LV61AA42.
Note:VA00 condition type is getting deleted from the internal table tkomv[].
If any one came across this scenario can you please help me.
Request your valuable inputs

Hi,
Please check the copy control setting in VTAA.
Maintain the pricing type as "D" at item category level for the respective document type .
Hope this will resolve your issue.
Regards,
Krishna O

Condition type 'Value' check mark

Hi All,
In Condition type definition, you have a check mark option for 'Value' (in the scetion 'Changes which can be made'). What is that for?
The F1 help text says " Specifies whether the value of the condition type can be changed during document processing"
But either way (check or no check), i can still change the value for the cond type in Sales Order. Then what is that for?
Thanks
AriBis

Hi AriBis,
There are Amount, Condition base value and CONDITION VALUE field in the item condition tab.
If you set option for "Value", the CONDITION VALUE field will be changeable.
It's not Amount field.
In simple case, if you need to set total price per item manually regardless its price and qty, then you may change the value in CONDITION VALUE field.
Regards,
Gumanti

MM Condition Types values flow COPA

Dear Gurus,
My client requirement is MM Condition Types Values Should flow to COPA like SD to COPA. I had seen a screen that KE4IM is there we can map our COPA Value Field and MM Condition Types. But I am not sure that values flow to COPA, Because No document will be generated in FI or other while doing PO.
Pl suggest me how can I fullfill this requirement.
Regards,
Balaji Bhonsle.

Hi,
If you read config doco for KE4IM you will find a statement:
"It is also possible to transfer conditions from MM to update billing data in pooled payment in the IS Retail system. These are transferred according to the same rules as SD conditions."
So KE4IM is only used in IS Retail. Are you IS Retail?
If not you probably want to bring conditions from purchase orders to CO-PA.
I agree with Ajay except for point 1.
You can actualy trigger CO-PA posting during goods receipt (and invoice receipt) for PO.
In order to achive it you need to activate "Purchase Accounting" in MM.
SPRO -> Marterials Management -> Valuation and Account Assignment -> Account Determination -> Account Determination without Wizard -> Purchase Account Management
Please read doco for Purchasing Account. In a nutshell when you activate it system will post addtional line item for GR and IR:
Purchasing account and Purchasing Offseting account for value of purchased nmaterial and also for delivery costs.
In table T030: Purchase account(EIN), purchase offsetting account (EKG), freight purchase account (FRE).
Define EIN and FRE as cost elements and map to profitability segment in OKB9. Leave EKG as P&L account (no cost element).
Then map cost elements to value fields in COPA.
Done.
Cheers,
Szymon

JMOD condition type value should be always rounded up instead of commercial

Hi Helpers,
I need one clarification from you all based on your expertise,
1. JMOD condition type value should be always rounded up instead of commercial.
2. i have been already made rounding up in the condition type JMOD in the transaction V/06. but unfortunatly not working.
3. after that we found that there is configuration change in spro (company code setting in the indai taxation-CIN) in the Logistic general> tax on goods movement>india> basic setting> company code setting for the commercialrounding, but the same is already ennabled with SD rounding IND.
Need your expertise on this.How shall we make it round up always for JMOD condition value. below is an example for your further analysis.
Example: if values UTXJ is : 8,913.40 and JMOD will be calculated based on UTXJ as 10% thats is 891.34.
Actually this should be 892 as per the requiremen.t

I just recently rolled off a project in Europe that had an issue similar to this. We were having rounding issues as a result of % discounts.
However, we did come up with a solution that is provided by SAP.
Please review OSS note 80183 on SAP rounding and the solutions provided within the note.
I hope this helps.
Kind Regards,
Jason

How to Avoid Duplicate Pricing Condition Types In Sales Order and Billing

Hi SAP Gurus
I have a requirement in Pricing (Sales and Distribution). We have issue duplicated condition types in Sales order and it causes wrong posting in to accounts.
I want make them inactive duplicated Condition type in Sales order and Billing Documents.
Please advice me how to make inactive status to duplicated Condition types
Thanks in Advance.
Ravikanth

Hi
You can use Exclusion Group
You can define 2 Groups and include 1 condition type in each
and define exlusion procedure
A   Best condition between condition types
B   Best condition within the condition type
C   Best condition between the two exclusion groups
D   Exclusive
E   Least favorable within the condition type
F   Least favorable betweent the two exclusion groups
you can use Exclusive to set your condition type or as per your requirement
Regards
Jitesh

Condition type value not update in sales order

Hello Guru's
As per the sales order in VA01 the condition type value i.e surcharge value is not updating in sales order.
But I have maintain the condition record(Surcharge)also and in Condition technique I have checked every thing is correct .
please find below I have attached the Screen short .
Please give me solution Asap.

Hi Sukdev,
Have you checked the respective pricing procedure for From and To reference step maintained against the condition type ZSUR?
Regards,
T.R.S.Praveen

How to stop non statistical condition type value from updating total amount

Gurus,
Can any body explain me how to do following setting,
How to Stop non statistical condition type value from updating Total Amount
Regards,
Sai

Dear Sai,
You need to make that condition type as Statistical one
Go to SPRO - Sales and Distr. - Basic Functions - Pricing - Define and Assign Pricing Proc - Maintain Pricing Proc - Control Date
Select the proc. - select the condition type and activate the check box Statistical
This will show the amount of the condition but will not consider for the net value calculation
Hope this will help you
regards,
Sagar

Is it possibale statistical condition type value at FI GL account.

Dear Expert,
Hi I have a requirment like: Add new manual condition types at pricing porcedure level.
When I am creating SO these condition types value wont calculate in net value but that value needs to flow in to respective G/L account.
How we can map this requirement at Pricing Procedure level.
Can you please suggest.

Hi Ranganayakulu,
Yes, it is possible. Did you try to search in the forum. The answer is already provided in one of blog of SCN (" DOC-29788" in google).
Please search and let us know.

Changing condition type values in Billing Doc Line Items

Hi All,
I want to change the value of condition types JLST and JCST to zero in the line items of proforma invoices. How can I do this?
Any function module or BAPI? Should I go for BDC?? I tried to find user exits. What can be the optimal way to do this?
Please help.
Thanks in Advance
- Neha.

Hi Neha,
You pass 0 (zero) to the field COND_VALUE in CONDITIONSIN table alongwith other relevant data.
And pass 'X' to the field COND_VALUE in CONDITIONSINX.
hope it helps.
saroj

Condition Type - Values getting changed at billing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for