Query, subquery problem??.. SOS...

I've some trouble with this:
I've got 4 tables
LIVE
id
name
street
city
WORK
id
comp_id
sal
LOCATED_IN
com_id
name
city
financial_group
SUPERVISE
id
supervisor_id
now, the problem:
Lets say an XYZ financial group has companies located in different cities. I need to get all the companies from all others financial groups that have companies on all the cities where XYZ is present, For example if XYZ is present in LA, NY and SF, I need to get all the financial groups that have companies on all these cities as well even if they had companies in others citites besides these 3.
i've tried many ways but couldnt get to it yet. Appreciate any help. THANKS!!!!!

yeah matching up the column names... so it would be
LIVE
id (pk)
name
street
city (fk)
WORK
id (pk)(fk)
comp_id (fk)
sal
LOCATED_IN
comp_id (pk)(fk)
name
city (fk)
financial_group
SUPERVISE
id (pk)(fk)
supervisor_id

Similar Messages

About query related problem

hi ,
we are generate query in 2005b,and procced for execuite query.following problem occure'<b>odbc sql server driver'[sql server] syntax error the converting the nvarchar value' 70302/20307' to column of data type int received alert OAIB</b>
QUERY SHOWN BE AS FOLLOW.
SELECT T5.DocNum as'Po. No. ', T5.DocDate as 'Po Date',T0.CreateDate,T5.NumAtCard as 'Man.PO. No/ Dt.', T0.DocNum as'AP No. ', T0.DocDate as 'AP Date',T0.NumAtCard as 'Vendor Ref. No.', T0.U_vbdt as 'Vendor Ref. Date', T0.CardName as 'Vendor', T1.Dscription as 'Item', T1.Quantity AS 'QTY' , T1.Price as 'Basic Rate', (T1.Price *T1.Quantity) as 'Value',T0.Comments as 'Po No. & Po.Dt.' FROM OPCH T0 INNER JOIN PCH1 T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry INNER JOIN OCRD T2 ON T0.CardCode = T2.CardCode INNER JOIN OPDN T3 ON T2.CardCode = T3.CardCode INNER JOIN PDN1 T4 ON T3.DocEntry = T4.DocEntry INNER JOIN OPOR T5 ON T2.CardCode = T5.CardCode INNER JOIN POR1 T6 ON T5.DocEntry = T6.DocEntry INNER JOIN OITM T7 ON T1.ItemCode = T7.ItemCode INNER JOIN OITB T8 ON T7.ItmsGrpCod = T8.ItmsGrpCod WHERE ( T1.BaseRef = T3.DocNum ) AND ( T4.BaseRef = T5.DocNum ) AND ( T0.U_vbdt >=[%25]AND T0.U_vbdt <=[%26]) AND ( T4.Dscription =T1.Dscription ) AND ( T4.Dscription = T6.Dscription ) AND (( T1.Dscription=[%0] OR T1.Dscription=[%1] OR T1.Dscription=[%2] OR T1.Dscription=[%3] OR T1.Dscription=[%4] OR T1.Dscription=[%5] OR T1.Dscription=[%6] OR T1.Dscription=[%7] OR T1.Dscription=[%8] ) OR ( T0.CardName=[%10] OR T0.CardName=[%09] OR T0.CardName=[%27] OR T0.CardName=[%28] ) OR (( T8.ItmsGrpNam =[%11] oR T8.ItmsGrpNam =[%12] OR T8.ItmsGrpNam =[%13] OR T8.ItmsGrpNam =[%14] OR T8.ItmsGrpNam =[%15] OR T8.ItmsGrpNam =[%16] OR T8.ItmsGrpNam =[%17] OR T8.ItmsGrpNam =[%18] OR T8.ItmsGrpNam =[%19] ) and ( T7.U_FirmName =[%20] OR T7.U_FirmName =[%21] OR T7.U_FirmName =[%22]
oR T7.U_FirmName =[%23] OR T7.U_FirmName =[%24] )) )

Hi Vishal,
the value '70302/20307' is not an whole number so converting it to an int is not possible.
You should check your data for this value an change your query or data.
Regards
Ad

Query designing problem while applying cell properties

Hello Experts,
I have a problem while designing query. Problem is as follow:
I have a calculated field on key figure column. This key figure calculates variance between 2 columns.
for E.g I have 2 columns Budget and Actual and third column is %Variance which should be
1. ((Actual - Budget)/Budget) *100 or
2. ((Budget -Actual)/Budget)*100, depening on some values on the row i should use any of these 2 formulas but the result should be dispalyed in single column % Variance.
how can i change the formula in key figures depending on these conditions. I can achieve this by applying cells but i dont want to do so as it is very complex way to desing these queries.
also let me know applying cells on query affects its performance or not?
Regards,
Nirav

Hi Nitin,
Your reply may help me.
But my exact requirement is not that. Requirement is as follow:
I have created Char. Structure in row which contains few rows as revenue and few rows as expense.
I created them by creating selections. Now in case of expense the variance should be (Budget-Actual)/Budget *100.
In case of revenue variance should be (Actual-Budget)/Budget *100.
So, here i have to find out revenue & expense char. iresspective of which one is greater.
Regards,
Nirav

Query has problem

Below query has problem .
Pls see the queries for Usage Summary with Partition and Without Partition
. I have executed this now so it may be in Buffer …****
DB Query ... SUM from event objects, bin variables
SELECT sum(amount) , sum(quantity), event.poid_type,ebal.resource_id,****
event.service_obj_type, event.service_obj_id0,ebal.
rate_obj_id0, ebal.OFFERING_OBJ_ID0, ebal.IMPACT_CATEGORY ****
FROM event_bal_impacts_t ebal, item_t item, event_tevent*
WHERE event.item_obj_id0 = item.poid_id0****
AND ebal.obj_id0 = event.poid_id0****
--                   and event.Poid_id0 >= 266838277921701888****
--                 and event.Poid_id0 < 267928993456455680****
--               and ebal.obj_id0 >= 266838277921701888****
--             and ebal.obj_id0 < 267928993456455680****
AND item.bill_obj_id0 = 148715294****
AND ebal.product_obj_id0 = 27433706****
AND ebal.account_obj_id0 = 146876519****
AND item.account_obj_id0 = 146876519****
AND event.poid_type like '%session/telco/gsm%'****
AND ebal.impact_category <> 'Free'****
AND resource_id not in (select resource_id from
resource_id_t)****
group by****
event.poid_type, ebal.resource_id,****
event.service_obj_type, event.service_obj_id0,****
ebal.rate_obj_id0, ebal.OFFERING_OBJ_ID0,ebal.
IMPACT_CATEGORY****
order by****
ebal.resource_id desc;****
SELECT sum(amount) , sum(quantity), event.poid_type,ebal.
resource_id,****
event.service_obj_type, event.service_obj_id0,ebal.
rate_obj_id0, ebal.OFFERING_OBJ_ID0, ebal.IMPACT_CATEGORY ****
FROM event_bal_impacts_t ebal, item_t item, event_tevent*
WHERE event.item_obj_id0 = item.poid_id0****
AND ebal.obj_id0 = event.poid_id0****
and event.Poid_id0 >= 264199450015039488****
and event.Poid_id0 < 265237388991660032****
and ebal.obj_id0 >= 264199450015039488****
and ebal.obj_id0 < 265237388991660032****
AND item.bill_obj_id0 = 148715294****
AND ebal.product_obj_id0 = 27433706****
AND ebal.account_obj_id0 = 146876519****
AND item.account_obj_id0 = 146876519****
AND event.poid_type like '%session/telco/gsm%'****
AND ebal.impact_category <> 'Free'****
AND resource_id not in (select resource_id from
resource_id_t)****
group by****
event.poid_type, ebal.resource_id,****
event.service_obj_type, event.service_obj_id0,****
ebal.rate_obj_id0, ebal.OFFERING_OBJ_ID0,ebal.
IMPACT_CATEGORY****
order by****
ebal.resource_id desc;****
--

848478 wrote:
Below query has problem .
Pls see the queries for Usage Summary with Partition and Without Partition
. I have executed this now so it may be in Buffer …****
DB Query ... SUM from event objects, bin variables
SELECT sum(amount) , sum(quantity), event.poid_type,ebal.resource_id,****
event.service_obj_type, event.service_obj_id0,ebal.
rate_obj_id0, ebal.OFFERING_OBJ_ID0, ebal.IMPACT_CATEGORY ****
FROM event_bal_impacts_t ebal, item_t item, event_tevent*
WHERE event.item_obj_id0 = item.poid_id0****
AND ebal.obj_id0 = event.poid_id0****
--                   and event.Poid_id0 >= 266838277921701888****
--                 and event.Poid_id0 < 267928993456455680****
--               and ebal.obj_id0 >= 266838277921701888****
--             and ebal.obj_id0 < 267928993456455680****
AND item.bill_obj_id0 = 148715294****
AND ebal.product_obj_id0 = 27433706****
AND ebal.account_obj_id0 = 146876519****
AND item.account_obj_id0 = 146876519****
AND event.poid_type like '%session/telco/gsm%'****
AND ebal.impact_category <> 'Free'****
AND resource_id not in (select resource_id from
resource_id_t)****
group by****
event.poid_type, ebal.resource_id,****
event.service_obj_type, event.service_obj_id0,****
ebal.rate_obj_id0, ebal.OFFERING_OBJ_ID0,ebal.
IMPACT_CATEGORY****
order by****
ebal.resource_id desc;****
SELECT sum(amount) , sum(quantity), event.poid_type,ebal.
resource_id,****
event.service_obj_type, event.service_obj_id0,ebal.
rate_obj_id0, ebal.OFFERING_OBJ_ID0, ebal.IMPACT_CATEGORY ****
FROM event_bal_impacts_t ebal, item_t item, event_tevent*
WHERE event.item_obj_id0 = item.poid_id0****
AND ebal.obj_id0 = event.poid_id0****
and event.Poid_id0 >= 264199450015039488****
and event.Poid_id0 < 265237388991660032****
and ebal.obj_id0 >= 264199450015039488****
and ebal.obj_id0 < 265237388991660032****
AND item.bill_obj_id0 = 148715294****
AND ebal.product_obj_id0 = 27433706****
AND ebal.account_obj_id0 = 146876519****
AND item.account_obj_id0 = 146876519****
AND event.poid_type like '%session/telco/gsm%'****
AND ebal.impact_category <> 'Free'****
AND resource_id not in (select resource_id from
resource_id_t)****
group by****
event.poid_type, ebal.resource_id,****
event.service_obj_type, event.service_obj_id0,****
ebal.rate_obj_id0, ebal.OFFERING_OBJ_ID0,ebal.
IMPACT_CATEGORY****
order by****
ebal.resource_id desc;****
--Consider getting the asterisk key fixed, since it results in invalid SQL syntax

Failure to search - query window problem

Hello again,
Have anyone of you came across a problem with SAP search mechanism in query window attached to document field? I've created a simple query of "Select acctcode,acctname from OACT where acctcode like '2%' and postable='Y' order by acctcode" and attached it to one of document fields (doesn't matter which one). When I run this query a usual window poped up with a search field on the top, but when I typed "2" in it, selection bar moved right into first 231 account ignoring any of the lesser numbers. There is more - when I changed query to search for '5%' like accounts, I gained the same result - accounts less than 530 were ignored even if I typed "50" or "51". BUT - when I changed query sort order to "desc", all account became "findable".
I got this problem in one database only which is SAP 8.8 PL10 version upgraded recently from 2007A one. I've checked with a newly created 8.8 and such problem hasn't occured.

Hello Thomasz,
I might be off base here, what happens when you use this???
Do you get the same types of query window problem???
Select
acctcode,
acctname,
segment_0
from OACT
where Segment_0 like '2%'
order by acctcode
for browse
Regards,
Zal

Complex query/subquery/join problem

Hi,
i need to retrieve information from our database in one single dataset but i can't get it all together...
Here's the situation:
We have several linked tables:
Workorder (wo_operation)
-woo_key
Workorder_task (wo_task)
-wot_key -> PK
-woo_key -> FK_woo
Workorder_task_labor (wo_task_labor)
-wtl_key -> PK
-wot_key -> FK_wot
-start_time -> essential field
I'm running a query which retrieves records from the Workorder (wo_operation) table like this (this one works nicely, don't mind the other joins):
SELECT
rownum num,
woo.woo_auto_key,
woo.si_number,
apc.application_code,
cmp.company_name,
woo.company_ref_number,
view_wo.serial_number,
view_wo.part_number,
view_wo.description part_description,
wos.description status_description
FROM (((((wo_operation woo INNER JOIN view_spb_wo_maincomponent view_wo ON woo.woo_auto_key = view_wo.woo_auto_key)
LEFT JOIN wo_status wos ON woo.wos_auto_key = wos.wos_auto_key)
INNER JOIN parts_master pnm ON woo.pnm_auto_key = pnm.pnm_auto_key)
INNER JOIN application_codes apc ON pnm.apc_auto_key = apc.apc_auto_key)
INNER JOIN companies cmp ON woo.cmp_auto_key = cmp.cmp_auto_key)
WHERE woo.wos_auto_key IS NULL OR woo.wos_auto_key not IN (2, 10)
Now here's the problem. I need to add one more column which shows the last task (max(wo_task_labor.start_time)) that people have been working on (wo_task.description).
Wo_task is linked to wo_operation on WOO_KEY (many TO one)
Wo_task_labor is linked to Wo_task on WOT_KEY (zero or many TO one)
So I need to find the MAX wo_task_labor.START_TIME and then Select the wo_task.description with that start_time. BUT since the relation is ZERO OR MORE to ONE it could be that there isn't even a START_TIME available for Max() function.......
Is there anybody who could send me in the right direction???

Hmmz ok, I just finished a more readable problem description.. Were you absolutely certain that my problem needs another approach?
here's the problem again:
Situation:
wo_operation
| Woo_auto_key | Si_number |
| 1            | w100      |
| 2            | w105      |
| 3            | w200      |
wo_task
| Wot_auto_key | Woo_auto_key | Description |
| 1            | 1            | OPENING     |
| 2            | 1            | INSPECT     |
| 3            | 2            | OPENING     |
| 4            | 2            | REJECT      |
| 5            | 3            | OPENING     |
Wo_task_labor
| Wtl_auto_key | Wot_auto_key | Start_time | Stop_time |
| 1            | 1            | 7:00       | 7:05      |
| 2            | 1            | 11:45      | 12:00     |
| 3            | 2            | 10:00      | 10:15     |
| 4            | 2            | 11:00      | 11:20     |
| 5            | 2            | 11:35      | 11:40     |
| 6            | 3            | 9:00       | 9:15      |
| 7            | 3            | 9:30       | 9:40      |
| 7            | 3            | 9:45       | 9:50      |
| 8            | 4            | 9:00       | 10:00     |
| 9            | 4            | 10:15      | 10:30     |
Query:
SELECT
     woo.si_number
FROM
     wo_operation woo
Result:
| SI_NUMBER |
| w100      |
| w105      |
| w200      |
My needed result:
| SI_NUMBER | DESCRIPTION      |
| w100      | OPENING          | -> last labor is wtl_auto_key 2 from 11:45 to 12:00
| w105      | REJECT           | -> last labor is wtl_auto_key 9 from 10:15 to 10:30
| w200      | (null) or 'none' | -> last labor is not available since there is no labor record
How can this be done querywise?
Message was edited by:
user574699

Query Optimization Problem

Hi
I have a optimization problem and wondering if you can help me, The problem is I am getting two diffrent costs for two diffrent users, when I login and run as the object owner the cost is normal but when I login and run the query as a diffrent user I have a dramatic increase in the costs.
For example to retrieve the rows from Work_Order_Coding_Tab as the object owner the cost is 1 while logged in as the other user the cost is 26070 :(.
views such as xxx_work_order_coding, active_work_order has got more than 2 million records.
The query is
SELECT a.wo_no "AOnr", a.customer_no "Kundnr", c.name "Kundnamn",
a.contact "Kontakt", a.reference_no "Referens",
a.err_descr "Kort_beskrivning", replace(a.err_descr_lo, chr(13) ||
chr(10), ' ') "Lång_beskrivning", a.mch_code "Objektnr",
b.mch_name "Objektnamn", replace(a.performed_action_lo, chr(13) ||
chr(10), ' ') "Utfört arbete", sum(b.amount) "Kostnad", sum(
b.sales_price_amount) "Kundpris", a.reg_date "Regdatum",
a.real_f_date "Utf_datum", a.work_master_sign "Arbetsbefäl",
a.work_type_id "Arbetstyp", a.state "Status"
FROM objown.active_work_order a, objown.xxx_work_order_coding b,
objown.cust_ord_customer c
WHERE b.work_order_account_type = 'Kostnad'
AND a.wo_no = b.wo_no
AND a.mch_code = b.mch_code
AND a.customer_no = b.customer_no
AND a.customer_no = c.customer_no
AND b.customer_no = c.customer_no
AND a.mch_code = b.mch_code
AND b.order_no IS NULL
AND a.agreement_id IS NULL
AND (a.work_type_id = 'L'
OR a.work_type_id = 'U'
OR a.work_type_id = 'S'
OR a.work_type_id = 'T'
OR a.work_type_id = 'UF')
AND a.customer_no < '5%'
AND a.customer_no LIKE '10027'
AND a.org_code LIKE '510'
AND a.state LIKE 'Av%'
GROUP BY a.wo_no, a.customer_no, c.name, a.contact, a.err_descr,
a.err_descr_lo, a.mch_code, b.mch_name, a.performed_action_lo,
a.work_master_sign, a.work_type_id, a.reference_no, a.state,
a.reg_date, a.real_f_date
When Running as the object owner I get the following costs, is
Step # Description Est. Cost Est. Rows Returned Est. KBytes Returned
1 This plan step retrieves a single ROWID from the B*-tree index CUST_ORD_CUSTOMER_PK. 1 1 0,007
2 This plan step retrieves one or more ROWIDs in ascending order by scanning the B*-tree index ACTIVE_WORK_ORDER_IX4. 1 1 --
3 This plan step retrieves rows from table ACTIVE_WORK_ORDER_TAB through ROWID(s) returned by an index. 1 1 0,198
4 This plan step loops through the query's IN list predicate, executing its child step for each value found.
5 This plan step joins two sets of rows by iterating over the driving, or outer, row set (the first child of the join) and, for each row, carrying out the steps of the inner row set (the second child). Corresponding pairs of rows are tested against the join condition specified in the query's WHERE clause. 2 1 0,205
6 This plan step retrieves one or more ROWIDs in ascending order by scanning the B*-tree index WORK_ORDER_CODING_PK. 1 1 --
7 This plan step retrieves rows from table WORK_ORDER_CODING_TAB through ROWID(s) returned by an index. 1 1 0,053
8 This plan step joins two sets of rows by iterating over the driving, or outer, row set (the first child of the join) and, for each row, carrying out the steps of the inner row set (the second child). Corresponding pairs of rows are tested against the join condition specified in the query's WHERE clause. 3 1 0,258
9 This plan step retrieves a single ROWID from the B*-tree index ACTIVE_WORK_ORDER_PK. 1 1 --
10 This plan step retrieves rows from table ACTIVE_WORK_ORDER_TAB through ROWID(s) returned by an index. 1 1 0,014
11 This plan step joins two sets of rows by iterating over the driving, or outer, row set (the first child of the join) and, for each row, carrying out the steps of the inner row set (the second child). Corresponding pairs of rows are tested against the join condition specified in the query's WHERE clause. 4 1 0,271
12 This plan step has no supplementary description information.
13 This plan step designates this statement as a SELECT statement. 5 1 0,271
AND Running as end user brings the following costs!
1 This plan step retrieves a single ROWID from the B*-tree index CUST_ORD_CUSTOMER_PK. 1 1 0,007
2 This plan step retrieves one or more ROWIDs in ascending order by scanning the B*-tree index ACTIVE_WORK_ORDER_IX4. 1 360 --
3 This plan step retrieves rows from table ACTIVE_WORK_ORDER_TAB through ROWID(s) returned by an index. 29 10 1,982
4 This plan step loops through the query's IN list predicate, executing its child step for each value found.
5 This plan step represents the execution plan for the subquery defined by the view ACTIVE_WORK_ORDER. 29 1 4,095
6 This plan step joins two sets of rows by iterating over the driving, or outer, row set (the first child of the join) and, for each row, carrying out the steps of the inner row set (the second child). Corresponding pairs of rows are tested against the join condition specified in the query's WHERE clause. 30 1 4,102
7 This plan step retrieves all rows from table WORK_ORDER_CODING_TAB. 26 070 10 0,527
8 This plan step retrieves a single ROWID from the B*-tree index ACTIVE_WORK_ORDER_PK. 1 1 --
9 This plan step retrieves rows from table ACTIVE_WORK_ORDER_TAB through ROWID(s) returned by an index. 1 1 0,014
10 This plan step joins two sets of rows by iterating over the driving, or outer, row set (the first child of the join) and, for each row, carrying out the steps of the inner row set (the second child). Corresponding pairs of rows are tested against the join condition specified in the query's WHERE clause. 26 071 3 0,199
11 This plan step represents the execution plan for the subquery defined by the view XXX_WORK_ORDER_CODING. 26 071 3 17,748
12 This plan step accepts two sets of rows, each from a different table. A hash table is built using the rows returned by the first child. Each row returned by the second child is then used to probe the hash table to find row pairs which satisfy a condition specified in the query's WHERE clause. Note: The Oracle cost-based optimizer will build the hash table using what it thinks is the smaller of the two tables. It uses the statistics to determine which is smaller, so out of date statistics could cause the optimizer to make the wrong choice. 26 102 1 10,018
13 This plan step has no supplementary description information.
14 This plan step designates this statement as a SELECT statement. 26 103 -- --

AND a.customer_no < '5%'
AND a.customer_no LIKE '10027'
AND a.org_code LIKE '510'
Does the query bring back the expected results? There appears to be an issue with your customer_no logic. The only customer_no that will meet your criteria is '10027', the < '5%' appears redundant.
with a as (
select '10027' customer_no from dual union all
select '10027x' customer_no from dual)
select *
from a
where a.customer_no < '5%'
and a.customer_no like '10027';Also, your LIKE operators can be rewritten as '=' if you do not use wildcards, ie '%' or '_'.
If the active_work_order table is larger than the others, you may want to use the smallest table when comparing the customer_no column as it may assist in the execution path.

Query help - problems with ROLLUP

I'm trying to make a query i can use for an alert, it generates sales for the past 7 days.
This query works fine:
SELECT
      CASE WHEN GROUPING(T0.[CardCode]) = 0
            THEN CAST (T0.[CardCode] AS CHAR(8))
            ELSE 'ALL'
      END AS Customer#,
      SUM(T0.[Max1099]) AS "Total Sales",
      SUM(T0.[GrosProfit]) AS "Gross Profit"
FROM OINV T0
WHERE T0.[DocDate] >= DATEADD(dd,DATEDIFF(dd,0,GETDATE())-7,0) AND T0.[Max1099] > 0
GROUP BY T0.[CardCode] WITH ROLLUP
And it gives me this:
#     Customer#*     Total Sales*     Gross Profit*
1     C2235              8,285.87       4,165.77
2     C2236           10,191.39              4,197.95
3     C2253                570.56               311.17
4     C3008           18,756.76       5,720.21
5     ALL                   37,804.58    14,395.10
Which is great. Gives me a total at the end, and substitutes "ALL" for the customer number. Lovely.
Problem #1: I REALLY want it to give the Customer Name NEXT TO the Customer Number. But when I try to add it, i have to add it to the GROUP BY as well. Which changes the query to this:
SELECT
      CASE WHEN GROUPING(T0.[CardCode]) = 0
            THEN CAST (T0.[CardCode] AS CHAR(8))
            ELSE 'ALL'
      END AS Customer#,
      CardName as "Cust Name",
      SUM(T0.[Max1099]) AS "Total Sales",
      SUM(T0.[GrosProfit]) AS "Gross Profit"
FROM OINV T0
WHERE T0.[DocDate] >= DATEADD(dd,DATEDIFF(dd,0,GETDATE())-7,0) AND T0.[Max1099] > 0
GROUP BY T0.[CardCode], T0.[CardName] WITH ROLLUP
And changes my output to THIS:
#     Customer#     Cust Name                             Total Sales     Gross Profit
1     C2235             Acme Products                      8,285.87               4,165.77
2     C2235          (blanks blanks)                        8,285.87               4,165.77
3     C2236             Some Other Products             10,191.39               4,197.95
4     C2236          (blanks blanks blanks)            10,191.39               4,197.95
5     C2253             Third Customer Name             570.56                  311.17
6     C2253          (blanks blanks blanks)                570.56                  311.17
7     C3008             Fourth Customer Name      18,756.76       5,720.21
8     C3008          (blanks blanks blanks)                                               18,756.76       5,720.21
9     ALL                                                                  37,804.58     14,395.10
( I have replaced actual customer names, of course, and replaces actual blanks with the word 'blanks' so it would be more legible.)
I can't figure out a way to simply list the customer name next to the number. Instead , it gives me a summary for the CardCode and a summary for the CardName.
I've tried combining the two into one field, on the fly, but haven't been successful.
Problem #2 - extra credit!
If i really want this done right, i should also have a query that pulls the same data from ORIN (Credit Memos) and do a UNION ALL, but when i do this, is simply rejects me at the word "UNION"
any and all help appreciated, and to test this, you can just cut and past the query into SAP, it will run right there, no mods needed.
oops. I had to change the "Not Equal" symbol to just "greater than" for "Max1099" because it was just dropping the symbol...
Edited by: Dante Amodeo on Jan 18, 2012 6:30 PM

Try:
SELECT CAST (T0.CardCode AS CHAR(8)) AS Customer#,
MAX(T0.CardName) 'Customer Name',
SUM(T0.Max1099) AS 'Total Sales',
SUM(T0.GrosProfit) AS 'Gross Profit'
FROM OINV T0
WHERE DATEDIFF(dd,T0.DocDate,GETDATE())<=7 AND T0.Max1099 > 0
GROUP BY T0.CardCode
UNION ALL
SELECT 'ALL','',SUM(T0.Max1099),
SUM(T0.GrosProfit)
FROM OINV T0
WHERE DATEDIFF(dd,T0.DocDate,GETDATE())<=7 AND T0.Max1099 > 0

BI 7.0 Infoset query open problem: query_tech_name_Fxx is not a valid char.

Our BASIS transport our BW 3.5 queries to BI 7.0 system. We can open all queries on the BI 7.0 box without problem except Infoset queries. The Infoset is composed of two ODSs and when openning it BI 7.0 query designer, can not see any design element in the panes of Rows, Columns, Free Char. and etc., instead the error msg shows (in between two dashed lines below):
Terminate: query_technical_name_Fxx is not a valid characteristic for InfoProvider [A122(BRAIN)]
Diagnosis
Customer enhancement RSR00002 or the implementation of BAdI RSR_OLAB_BADI delivers query_technical_name_Fxx as the characteristic to be calculated. 1. is, however, not a valid key figure for InfoProvider .
System Response
The information from query_technical_name_Fxx is ignored.
Procedure
Check the exit.
Procedure for System Administration
We've checked the enhancement RSR00002 and it's components and find they are all the same as our BW 3.5 system. query_technical_name_Fxx is Company Code InfoObj. in one ODS and it's one of the key to join these two InfoSets.
Any idea?
Thanks

hi Kevin,
check if helps following oss note
Note 983449 - Termin A122 1COLUMN no valid characteristic of infoprovider
Symptom
Termination A 122 Brain occurs when you test and generate a query. The system does not recognise the characteristic 1COLUMN.
Other terms
Query, condition, COB_PRO
Reason and Prerequisites
This problem is caused by a program error.
Solution
SAP NetWeaver 2004s BI
Import Support Package 10 for SAP NetWeaver 2004s BI (BI Patch 10 or SAPKW70010) into your BI system. The Support Package is available once Note 914304 "SAPBINews BI 7.0 Support Package 10", which describes this Support Package in more detail, has been released for customers.
In urgent cases, you can implement the correction instructions.
You must first implement Notes 932065, 935140, 948389, 964580 and 969846, which provide information about transaction SNOTE. Otherwise, problems and syntax errors may occur when you deimplement some notes.

The problem about integrate Portal and R/3 : vendor query report problem

Hi everyone :
   We want to achieve that our vendor can query R/3 report via our Portal. I had done SSO configuration.
   But we had about 500 vendors, it is impossible that we create 500 R/3 users for our vendors, because the cost is too much .
   And there is another problem, vendor who had the authorization to query report can query the other vendor's data at same time. But we expect that certain vendor can query his data only.
   I think this is a general problem when integrate Portal and R/3, BW .
   Is there somebody had solved this problem or give any advice?
   Any discuss is welcome.
Best Regards,
Jianguo Chen

Hi,
I would say: get in contact with your SAP account manager anc check which options SAP can offer you...
Normally every user using a R/3 system has to have a valid user license in that system. Expecially when you want to access control to data on user (vendor) level you nedd to identifiy the user clearly and uniquely which by standard means you need a user for every vendor.
Hth,
Michael

HELP - Query Join Problem

I am trying to write a query to return data from 4 different tables and it is doubling my summed values. I can get the separate queries to work, but not combined and I need them combined so that I can get a balance due and limit the records to only those that had a total billed (fees) less than $200.
Query #1 Gets the total of the fees due for each appeal type and invoice:
Note: There is always at least one fee attached to an invoice.
SELECT APT.APTY_DESCR "APPEAL TYPE",
INV.INVC_ID_SEQ INVOICE,
SUM( ALL FEE.AMT_DUE) "TOTAL BILLED AMOUNT"
FROM WRD_APPEALS AP,
WRD_INVOICES INV,
WRD_FEES_DUE FEE,
WRD_APPEAL_TYPES APT
WHERE AP.APST_CD = 'PEND'
AND AP.INVC_ID_SEQ = INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
AND AP.INVC_ID_SEQ = FEE.INVC_ID_SEQ
AND AP.APTY_CD = APT.APTY_CD
GROUP BY APT.APTY_DESCR, INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
ORDER BY APT.APTY_DESCR, INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
4     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4147     1200
5     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4203     1100
6     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4216     72600
7     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4826     1000
8     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4951     2060
Query #2 Gets the total amount paid for each appeal type and invoice:
Note: An invoice may or may not have a payment, thus the outer join.
SELECT APT.APTY_DESCR "APPEAL TYPE",
INV.INVC_ID_SEQ INVOICE,
SUM(ALL PMT.PAID_AMT) "AMOUNT PAID"
FROM WRD_APPEALS AP,
WRD_INVOICES INV,
WRD_APPEAL_TYPES APT,
WRD_PAYMENTS PMT
WHERE AP.APST_CD = 'PEND'
AND AP.INVC_ID_SEQ = INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
AND AP.APTY_CD = APT.APTY_CD
AND INV.INVC_ID_SEQ = PMT.INVC_ID_SEQ(+)
GROUP BY APT.APTY_DESCR, INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
ORDER BY APT.APTY_DESCR, INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
4     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4147     200
5     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4203     0
6     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4216     72600
7     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4826
8     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4951
Combined Query - Gets all of the above as well as the balance due. Note the doubled values for some records.
SELECT APT.APTY_DESCR "APPEAL TYPE",
INV.INVC_ID_SEQ INVOICE,
SUM( ALL FEE.AMT_DUE) "TOTAL BILLED AMOUNT",
     SUM(ALL PMT.PAID_AMT) "AMOUNT PAID",
     (SUM(ALL FEE.AMT_DUE) -
     NVL2(SUM(ALL PMT.PAID_AMT), SUM(ALL PMT.PAID_AMT), 0)) "BALANCE DUE"
FROM WRD_APPEALS AP,
WRD_INVOICES INV,
WRD_FEES_DUE FEE,
WRD_APPEAL_TYPES APT,
     WRD_PAYMENTS PMT
WHERE AP.APST_CD = 'PEND'
AND AP.INVC_ID_SEQ = INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
     AND INV.INVC_ID_SEQ = PMT.INVC_ID_SEQ(+)
     AND INV.INVC_ID_SEQ = FEE.INVC_ID_SEQ
     AND AP.APTY_CD = APT.APTY_CD
GROUP BY APT.APTY_DESCR, INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
ORDER BY APT.APTY_DESCR, INV.INVC_ID_SEQ,
4     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4147     1200     400     800
5     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4203     2200     0     2200
6     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4216     72600     435600     -363000
7     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4826     1000          1000
8     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4951     2060          2060
HELP PLEASE!
Thank you.

When you have multiple child rows, the parent row gets returned once for each child row found. Therefore, if you have summed the invoice, it gets summed again for each payment. Perhaps this little example will help you understand the problem.
Note that I used a sub query here to obtain the desired results. Analytic functions can do the same I believe, but I am still learning them :-)
D> DROP TABLE DMILL.invoice;
Table dropped.
D>
D> DROP TABLE DMILL.payments;
Table dropped.
D>
D> CREATE TABLE invoice AS
     SELECT 1 id, 10 amount FROM DUAL UNION ALL
     SELECT 2 id, 10 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
     SELECT 2 id, 10 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
     SELECT 3 id, 10 FROM DUAL;
Table created.
D>
D> CREATE TABLE payments AS
     SELECT 1 inv_id, 5 amount FROM DUAL UNION ALL
     SELECT 1 inv_id, 5 amount FROM DUAL UNION ALL
     SELECT 2 inv_id, 5 amount FROM DUAL UNION ALL
     SELECT 2 inv_id, 5 amount FROM DUAL UNION ALL
     SELECT 2 inv_id, 5 amount FROM DUAL;
Table created.
D>
D> select * from invoice;
        ID     AMOUNT
         1         10
         2         10
         2         10
         3         10
D>
D> select * from payments;
    INV_ID     AMOUNT
         1          5
         1          5
         2          5
         2          5
         2          5
D>
D> select id
              ,sum (amount)
      from invoice
     group by id;
        ID SUM(AMOUNT)
         1          10
         2          20
         3          10
D>
D> select inv_id
              ,sum(amount)
      from payments
     group by inv_id;
    INV_ID SUM(AMOUNT)
         1          10
         2          15
D>
D> select inv.id
              ,inv.amount
              ,pay.amount
      from invoice inv
             ,payments pay
     where pay.inv_id = inv.id;
        ID     AMOUNT     AMOUNT
         1         10          5
         1         10          5
         2         10          5
         2         10          5
         2         10          5
         2         10          5
         2         10          5
         2         10          5
8 rows selected.
D>
D> select inv.id
              ,sum(inv.amount)
              ,sum(pay.amount)
      from invoice inv
             ,payments pay
     where pay.inv_id = inv.id
     group by inv.id;
        ID SUM(INV.AMOUNT) SUM(PAY.AMOUNT)
         1              20              10
         2              60              30
D>
D> select inv.id
              ,sum(inv.amount)
              ,(SELECT sum(pay.amount)
                FROM   payments pay
                WHERE pay.inv_id = inv.id)
      from invoice inv
     group by inv.id;
        ID SUM(INV.AMOUNT) (SELECTSUM(PAY.AMOUNT)FROMPAYMENTSPAYWHEREPAY.INV_ID=INV.ID)
         1              10                                                           10
         2              20                                                           15
         3              10Let me know if you need further explanation.

Report query parsing problem

I didn't find any report of this problem...
Using APEX 3.0.1.00.07, I have a report of type "SQL Query (PL/SQL function body returning SQL query)" with the "Use Generic Column Names (parse query at runtime only)" radio button selected.
When the region source contains the string "ORDER BY" in any form that I've tried (even in a comment), attempting to save the region fails with "Your query can't include an "ORDER BY" clause when having column heading sorting enabled."
I do indeed have column sorting enabled on certain columns, but I don't see how that is relevant under these circumstances since the query produced at runtime does not have an ORDER BY clause.
Am I overlooking something or is this a parsing problem?
Rodney

Rodney,
It's just checking for order by being included in your query, and if so and you have column heading sorting enabled, it's raising this error because you can't have both (even if it's commented out).
Regards,
Marc

BEx query change problem

Hi there,
In QA, when I try to open the local view or global view of a query in BEx, I am getting the following error/message
"The following objects were not found when accessing the server.."
-Press Repair to correct the problem(incorrect parts of the query are automatically deleted)
If anyone has faced the issue kindly let me know.
Thank You
Ace

Hi Ace,
Welcome to SDN!
It seems the objects mentioned in the message were not available in the dataprovider on which the query is based, hence the query designer is trying to correct this (which is a default behavior of the query designer).
This can happen if you had those objects in the datatarget initially and both the datatarget/query were transported into QA initially, and subsequently any of those objects may have been removed from the datatarget definition, and when the latest objects are moved to QA, by default query designer detects it and prompts you for the correction.
So, after validating the fact that those missing objects were removed for valid reasons from the corresponding datatarget definition, click on repair and you should be able to continue further.
Hope it helps,
Sree

Select query join problem

hey guys,
i've used a select query to get details from KNA1, KNVV, ADRC, KNVP, pa0002. tables by joining. but i'm getting only about 170 records. there are more than 3000 records in the database. for each tables. here is my select query
SELECT KNA1KUNNR KNA1NAME1 KNA1NAME2 ADRCSTR_SUPPL1 ADRCSTR_SUPPL2 ADRCSTR_SUPPL3 ADRCCITY1 KNVVVWERK KNVPPERNR PA0002VORNA PA0002NACHN KNVVVKBUR KNVVKDGRP KNA1STCD1 KNA1~STCEG
    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE IT_FINAL FROM KNA1
    INNER JOIN KNVV ON KNA1KUNNR = KNVVKUNNR
    INNER JOIN ADRC ON KNA1ADRNR = ADRCADDRNUMBER
    INNER JOIN KNVP ON KNA1KUNNR = KNVPKUNNR
    INNER JOIN PA0002 ON KNVPPERNR = PA0002PERNR
    WHERE KNA1KUNNR IN S_KUNNR AND KNVVVWERK in P_VWERK AND PA0002PERNR IN S_PERNR AND KNVVVKBUR IN S_VKBUR AND KNVV~KDGRP IN S_KDGRP.
can anyone tell me the problem in the above query.
thanks.

Hi
you are using tables KNA1, KNVV, ADRC, KNVP, pa0002.
Create internal table for each table mentioned above with all the primary keys and find the links between them
then select data in one table and select data from another table into your internal table for all the entries exists in firs internal table.
go for below links.
http://www.sapdev.co.uk/abap/commands/select_forallentries.htm
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/FORALLENTRIES-Home+page
http://help.sap.com/abapdocu_70/en/ABENWHERE_LOGEXP_ITAB.htm
Thanks
lalit

Query designer problem

Dear All,
I am facing the problem in the query designer that when i edit any of the formula in the query it allows me but when i edit it second time , it wont allow me and throws a following exception...
"An unhandled exception has occurred in your application. If you click Continue, the application will ignore this error and attempt to continue. If you click Quit, the application will be shut down immediately.
Object reference not set to an instance of an object."
and in details of the exception the following comes...
See the end of this message for details on invoking
just-in-time (JIT) debugging instead of this dialog box.
                                    Exception Text
System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDbPoolEditSelection.Get()
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDbCommandEditElement.EditFormula(IQDView iSelectedView)
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDbCommandEditElement.ExecuteCommand()
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDbCommandBase.Execute()
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDbCommandManager.CommandExecute(QDbCommandBase iCommand)
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDbCommandManager.InitialCommandExecute(QDbCommandBase iCommand)
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDbCommandManager.DoExecuteCommandInternal()
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDbCommandManager.ItemClickedHandler(Object sender, BarItemClickedEventArgs args)
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDdEventDispatcher.MenuItemClickedHandler(Object iSender, BarItemClickedEventArgs iE)
   at Syncfusion.Windows.Forms.Tools.XPMenus.BarManager.OnItemClicked(BarItemClickedEventArgs args)
   at Syncfusion.Windows.Forms.Tools.XPMenus.BarItem.OnItemClicked(EventArgs args)
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDiBarItem.OnItemClicked(EventArgs args)
   at Syncfusion.Windows.Forms.Tools.XPMenus.BarItem.PerformClick()
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDbCommandManager.ExecuteDoubleclickCommand(ParentBarItem iContextMenu)
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDbCommandManager.NodeDoubleClickHandler(Object sender, EventArgs e)
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDdEventDispatcher.ItemDoubleClickHandler(Object sender, EventArgs e)
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDdEventDispatcher.ItemDoubleClickHandler(Object sender, EventArgs e)
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDuHeaderTree.OnItemDoubleClick(EventArgs iE)
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDuHeaderTree.NodeDoubleClickHandler(Object sender, EventArgs e)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.OnDoubleClick(EventArgs e)
   at Syncfusion.Windows.Forms.Tools.TreeViewAdv.OnDoubleClick(EventArgs e)
   at com.sap.bi.et.QueryDesigner.QDiTree.OnDoubleClick(EventArgs e)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmMouseUp(Message& m, MouseButtons button, Int32 clicks)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
   at Syncfusion.Windows.Forms.ScrollControl.WmMouseUp(Message& msg)
   at Syncfusion.Windows.Forms.ScrollControl.WndProc(Message& msg)
   at Syncfusion.Windows.Forms.Tools.TreeViewAdv.WndProc(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)
                                                 Loaded Assemblies
mscorlib
    Assembly Version: 1.0.5000.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2407
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/microsoft.net/framework/v1.1.4322/mscorlib.dll
BExQueryDesignerStarter
    Assembly Version: 7000.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 7005.5.1401.486
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/BExQueryDesignerStarter.exe
System
    Assembly Version: 1.0.5000.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2407
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system/1.0.5000.0__b77a5c561934e089/system.dll
BExQueryDesigner
    Assembly Version: 7000.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 7005.5.1401.486
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/BExQueryDesigner.DLL
BExCommon
    Assembly Version: 7000.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 7005.5.1401.122
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/BExCommon.DLL
BExControls
    Assembly Version: 7000.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 7005.5.1401.122
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/BExControls.DLL
BExCAControls
    Assembly Version: 7000.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 7005.5.1401.122
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/BExCAControls.DLL
System.Windows.Forms
    Assembly Version: 1.0.5000.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2032
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system.windows.forms/1.0.5000.0__b77a5c561934e089/system.windows.forms.dll
BExCommunication
    Assembly Version: 7000.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 7005.5.1401.122
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/BExCommunication.DLL
Microsoft.VisualBasic
    Assembly Version: 7.0.5000.0
    Win32 Version: 7.10.6001.4
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/microsoft.visualbasic/7.0.5000.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/microsoft.visualbasic.dll
System.Xml
    Assembly Version: 1.0.5000.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2032
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system.xml/1.0.5000.0__b77a5c561934e089/system.xml.dll
8mfr2iet
    Assembly Version: 0.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2407
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system/1.0.5000.0__b77a5c561934e089/system.dll
SAP.Connector
    Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 2.0.0.23
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/sap.connector/2.0.0.0__50436dca5c7f7d23/sap.connector.dll
Interop.SAPLogonCtrl
    Assembly Version: 1.1.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.0.0
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/Interop.SAPLogonCtrl.DLL
SAP.Connector.Rfc
    Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 2.0.0.23
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/sap.connector.rfc/2.0.0.0__50436dca5c7f7d23/sap.connector.rfc.dll
BExGeneratedAll
    Assembly Version: 7000.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 7005.5.1401.123
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/BExGeneratedAll.DLL
System.Web.Services
    Assembly Version: 1.0.5000.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2032
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system.web.services/1.0.5000.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/system.web.services.dll
System.Drawing
    Assembly Version: 1.0.5000.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2032
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system.drawing/1.0.5000.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/system.drawing.dll
System.Web
    Assembly Version: 1.0.5000.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2407
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system.web/1.0.5000.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/system.web.dll
nwibr-hj
    Assembly Version: 0.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2407
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system/1.0.5000.0__b77a5c561934e089/system.dll
orv3kyon
    Assembly Version: 0.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2407
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system/1.0.5000.0__b77a5c561934e089/system.dll
3wroaodz
    Assembly Version: 0.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2407
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system/1.0.5000.0__b77a5c561934e089/system.dll
uzyztof1
    Assembly Version: 0.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2407
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system/1.0.5000.0__b77a5c561934e089/system.dll
bmpxtf3w
    Assembly Version: 0.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2407
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system/1.0.5000.0__b77a5c561934e089/system.dll
BExControls2
    Assembly Version: 7000.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 7005.5.1401.123
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/BExControls2.DLL
BExSharedImageList
    Assembly Version: 7000.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 7005.5.1401.122
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/BExSharedImageList.DLL
System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Soap
    Assembly Version: 1.0.5000.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2032
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system.runtime.serialization.formatters.soap/1.0.5000.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/system.runtime.serialization.formatters.soap.dll
BExSelectorAPI
    Assembly Version: 7000.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 7005.5.1401.202
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/BExSelectorAPI.DLL
System.Data
    Assembly Version: 1.0.5000.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2032
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system.data/1.0.5000.0__b77a5c561934e089/system.data.dll
BExOpenSaveServices
    Assembly Version: 7000.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 7005.5.1401.108
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/BExOpenSaveServices.DLL
Syncfusion.Tools.Windows
    Assembly Version: 4.401.0.51
    Win32 Version: 4.401.0.51
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/Syncfusion.Tools.Windows.DLL
Syncfusion.Shared.Base
    Assembly Version: 4.401.0.51
    Win32 Version: 4.401.0.51
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/Syncfusion.Shared.Base.DLL
Syncfusion.Grid.Windows
    Assembly Version: 4.401.0.51
    Win32 Version: 4.401.0.51
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/Syncfusion.Grid.Windows.DLL
Syncfusion.Core
    Assembly Version: 4.401.0.51
    Win32 Version: 4.401.0.51
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/Syncfusion.Core.DLL
Syncfusion.Grid.Base
    Assembly Version: 4.401.0.51
    Win32 Version: 4.401.0.51
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/Syncfusion.Grid.Base.DLL
Syncfusion.Shared.Windows
    Assembly Version: 4.401.0.51
    Win32 Version: 4.401.0.51
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/Syncfusion.Shared.Windows.DLL
Accessibility
    Assembly Version: 1.0.5000.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.573
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/accessibility/1.0.5000.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/accessibility.dll
AxInterop.SHDocVw
    Assembly Version: 1.1.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.0.0
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/AxInterop.SHDocVw.DLL
Interop.SHDocVw
    Assembly Version: 1.1.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.0.0
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/Interop.SHDocVw.DLL
Syncfusion.Edit.Windows
    Assembly Version: 4.401.0.51
    Win32 Version: 4.401.0.51
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/Syncfusion.Edit.Windows.DLL
ezadp-o7
    Assembly Version: 0.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2407
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system/1.0.5000.0__b77a5c561934e089/system.dll
czxpebds
    Assembly Version: 0.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2407
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system/1.0.5000.0__b77a5c561934e089/system.dll
ws48wlef
    Assembly Version: 0.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2407
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system/1.0.5000.0__b77a5c561934e089/system.dll
nbphnkyi
    Assembly Version: 0.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2407
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system/1.0.5000.0__b77a5c561934e089/system.dll
qmxat26w
    Assembly Version: 0.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2407
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system/1.0.5000.0__b77a5c561934e089/system.dll
BExFormulaParser
    Assembly Version: 7000.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 7005.5.1401.122
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/BExFormulaParser.DLL
RegexAssembly140_0
    Assembly Version: 0.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: n/a
    CodeBase:
System.Design
    Assembly Version: 1.0.5000.0
    Win32 Version: 1.1.4322.2032
    CodeBase: file:///c:/windows/assembly/gac/system.design/1.0.5000.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/system.design.dll
BExQueryDesignerFormulaParser
    Assembly Version: 7000.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 7005.5.1401.2
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files/SAP/FrontEnd/Bw/BExQueryDesignerFormulaParser.DLL
JIT Debugging **************
To enable just in time (JIT) debugging, the config file for this
application or machine (machine.config) must have the
jitDebugging value set in the system.windows.forms section.
The application must also be compiled with debugging
enabled.
For example:
<configuration>
    <system.windows.forms jitDebugging="true" />
</configuration>
When JIT debugging is enabled, any unhandled exception
will be sent to the JIT debugger registered on the machine
rather than being handled by this dialog.
Please anybody help me.
Nitesh

Hi,
This is a typical front end issue where you have to look at your GUI patch and front end patch.I recommend you deinstalling your frontend installation as follows:
- Remove your frontend via 'START' - 'PROGRAMS' - 'SAP FRONTEND' -
   'REMOVE SAP FRONTEND'
- Install the newest frontend and GUI patch and check the installation with sapbexc.xla
Please run the front-end checktool SAPBEXC.XLA as per Note 918394 and ensure there are no errors.
Path for frontend patches
Please goto
-> service.sap.com/patches
->entry by application group
->SAP Frontend Components
->SAP GUI FOR WINDOWS
->SAP GUI FOR WINDOWS 6.40
->SAP GUI FOR WINDOWS 6.40
->Win32
->Apply latest frontend patch
Once the installation is done run the installation check file as per note 918394 and ensure that there are no red flags.
Rgds
Manoj Kumar

Query, subquery problem??.. SOS...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for