Quesiton about Interface Trip Stop

We have a situation where our actual shipping is done by a third party. Consultants wrote two interfaces....one to create a file to be shiped once things are pick released, and another to import a file that will ship comfirm the same lines.
We had a situation where we were backed up for a while.
Essentially, we imported some files that were to ship confirm a lot of picked orders. I believe what happened were that they closed a lot of deliveries, but there were shipping exceptions so that even though they were closed, the corresponding order lines are still in a picked status. I'm guessing what happened was that the ITS wasn't run for these, and that's why they're where they are.
So, a lot of the exceptions were invalid tp dates, so I went ahead and closed all of those. But...I still need the order lines to close.
Can I run ITS blind, and if so will it work for all eligible deliveries, or do I have to run it for each delivery manually?
If I can run it wide open, will it only effect those deliveries that are eligible (i.e., only those that are ship confirmed)?
thanks for any guidance!!
-jerry

Hi Jerry,
I can't see any reason not to run it blind if you have 100s of deliveries for which the order lines need closing. As you surmise, it will just ignore anything ineligible. If you are still getting exceptions though, you might want to hone in more on where any problems lie ... i.e. run in debug mode and up your OM: Debug level to 5 so that you can see something meaningful in the output log for individual deliveries/trip stops.
One small caveat - if you're not supplying a trip stop or delivery in the ITS parameters then depending on your setup (i.e. if you have multiple orgs with their own shipping) you might want to at least populate the shipping warehouse in the organization parameter rather than run truly 'blind'.
It sounds as if your problems have all been in the DSNO part of the interface with tp date exceptions. I'm sure you're already aware that it's also possible to run the 3 parts of the ITS separately if necessary for troubleshooting ... lots of help on MOS for that.
Good luck...!
Jon

Similar Messages

  • Interface Trip Stop Run - Log file showing an Error

    Hi
    When I run Interface Trip Stop Run - SRS, Request completed successfully but it has the following error. " Failed GMI_Shipping_Util.GMI.UPDATE_SHIPMENT_TXN for Delivery Id 38237"
    In Sales Order the Line Status is Closed.
    In Shipping Transactions Form the Status is Showing Shipped.Next Step it Run Interfaces.
    When I checked the Lot Qty in Lot Genealogy the on hand qty of that lot is Zero.
    And the transaction is showing Pending in Item Transaction Inquiry.
    Please tell me how to proceed with this sales order.
    Thanks in Advance
    Prem.

    Its a concurrent program.
    Submit a request with name: Interface Trip Stop - SRS.
    i have tested and this will resolve your query too.

  • Internal Order: Interface trip stop: ERROR: unknown status = ''

    Hello,
    I have completed the setups for Internal orders:(the two orgs are within the same Operating unit, transfer method: direct)
    I am able to
    1. Create internal requisition
    2. Import Order
    3. Book, Pick Release and Submit ship confirm
    Now, the interface trip stop ( the inventory interface part) The status changes to shipped in Shipping transactions.
    The log file does not have an explicit error message. Posting truncated error message below. In more than one place, the following
    vague error messages appear.
    ERROR: unknown status = ''
    X_MASTER_STATUS ==> ERROR
    "Calling program unit WSH_DSNO.SUBMIT_TRIP_STOP
    Entering WSH_DSNO.SUBMIT_TRIP_STOP () (09/27/2006 09:11:09 PM)
    P_TRIP_STOP_ID ==> 4677
    PROCESSING DSNO IN TRIP STOP 4677
    RLM INSTALLED: YES
    Calling program unit RLM_TPA_SV.UPDATECUMKEY
    CHECKING EDI INSTALLATION STATUS
    EDI INSTALLED: YES
    DSNO PROFILE: ENABLED
    No Eligible Delivery for the DSNO
    Terminating program
    INTERFACETRIPSTOP: RESULT OF DSNO SUBMISSION FOR STOP_ID 4677 =
    Entering WSH_SHIP_CONFIRM_ACTIONS.UPDATE_COMPLETION_STATUS (WSHDDSHB.pls 115.310.11510.3) (09/27/2006 09:11:10 PM)
    p_num_stops ==> 1
    p_batch_id ==> is NULL
    X_MASTER_STATUS ==> NORMAL
    P_API_STATUS ==>
    X_NORMAL_COUNT ==> 0
    X_WARNING_COUNT ==> 0
    X_INTERFACED_COUNT ==> 0
    ERROR: unknown status = ''
    X_MASTER_STATUS ==> ERROR
    P_API_STATUS ==>
    X_NORMAL_COUNT ==> 0
    X_WARNING_COUNT ==> 0
    X_INTERFACED_COUNT ==> 0
    Exiting WSH_SHIP_CONFIRM_ACTIONS.UPDATE_COMPLETION_STATUS (09/27/2006 09:11:10 PM, .01 seconds)
    l_api_completion_status ==> INTERFACED
    l_previous_interface ==> TRUE
    Your help is greatly appreciated.
    Thank You,
    Somnath Subramanyam

    Hi somnath,
    U have enabled the DSNO (departure Ship notice outbound) in the profile option
    ECE_DSNO_ENABLED = yes. (through your log file)
    You go to e-commerce gateway responsibility --> go to setup --> profile option --> query this profile option and Change to no and then try again.
    Regards,
    Prasad

  • Interface trip stop  -- Completed with Warining in inventory where do you

    Hi Guru's
    While running concurrent program : Interface trip stop --> Completed with Warining
    in inventory where do you check this transaction.
    Please let me know the Navigation
    regds
    MRR

    Hi MRR,
    depending on the nature of the Warning and system setup you might want to look at:
    Inventory>Transaction>Pending Transactions
    or
    Inventory>Transactions>Transaction Open Interface.
    Is it an Internal Order or a regular Sales Order?
    Have you Opened the Invetory Txn periods for the given inventory organization etc.
    You should take a look at Oracle Diagnostics where there are specific report to troubleshoot Interface Trip related issues.
    For 11i the note 179661.1 gives a list of available Tests. Also follow links if you need R12.
    /Niels LM

  • Interface trip stop error

    hi all,
    I got interface trip stop error when I do the ship confirm process in sales order.
    Thanks&regards
    ravi

    Hi there,
    This forum is for Oracle OLAP users - what does your question relate to?
    Thanks
    Stuart

  • Interface trip stop not running on ship confirm

    Version: 11.5.10.2.
    Hi Guys
    While ship confirming the orders, for some of them, interface trip stop is not automatically running which keeps the order status " shipped" and the order does not become eligible for running autoinvoice.
    We have to unassign it from trip and autocreate delivery manually. from actions menu.
    This is not happening for all the orders, this is happening for some of them.
    What can be the root cause ? Please assist.
    Note:
    Defer interfaces is already unchecked.
    Regards
    Nouman Shaikh

    While processing ship confim, the interface trip stop request does not initiate by itself for some of the orders.
    What can cause it ?
    In such situation, we need to manually autocreate trip.
    What can be the reason behind it ? How to avoid it.
    I believe this is an an effective community.
    Regards
    Nouman Shaikh

  • What does 'SRS' mean in request 'Interface Trip Stop - SRS'?

    hi.
    What does 'SRS' mean in request 'Interface Trip Stop - SRS'?
    why it is added? Is there any special meaning?
    thank you
    Peter

    Use in SRS (System Administrator > Concurrent > Program > Define).
    Check this box to indicate that users can submit a request to run this program from a Standard Request Submission window.
    If you check this box, you must register your program parameters, if any, in the Parameters window accessed from the button at the bottom of this window.
    Oracle Applications System Administrator's Documentation Set
    http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B25516_14/current/html/docset.html

  • Interface Trip Stop Completed with Warning

    Hi All,
    For a sales order the line has been shipped where as the line status is showning as Picked and the delivery status is closed with the next step is showing as "Run Interface". While I have submitted the Interface Trip Stop, it completed with warning. The log file says:
    Shipping Execution: Version : 12.0.0
    Copyright (c) 1979, 1999, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
    WSHINTERFACES module: Interface Trip Stop - SRS
    Current system time is 20-APR-2009 07:31:03
    **Starts**20-APR-2009 07:31:03
    **Ends**20-APR-2009 07:31:03
    Interface trip stop is completed with warning
    Start of log messages from FND_FILE
    Starting WSH Debugger ==> 04/20/2009 07:31:03 AM,Session ID=2850630
    The following are the current Shipping related debug settings:
    OM: Debug Level ==> 0
    INV: Debug Level ==>
    WSH: Debug Enabled ==> Yes
    WSH: Debug File Prefix ==>
    WSH: Debug Level ==> Statement
    WSH: Debug Log Directory ==> /dtmp
    WSH: Debug Module ==> %
    Entering WSH_SHIP_CONFIRM_ACTIONS.INTERFACE_ALL_WRP (WSHDDSHB.pls 120.19.12010000.3) (04/20/2009 07:31:03 AM)
    P_MODE ==> ALL
    P_STOP_ID ==> is NULL
    P_DELIVERY_ID ==> 2888
    P_LOG_LEVEL ==> 1
    p_organization_id ==> 381
    p_num_requests ==> 1
    p_stops_per_batch ==> 1
    l_req_data ==>
    Entering WSH_SHIP_CONFIRM_ACTIONS.INTERFACE_ALL (WSHDDSHB.pls 120.19.12010000.3) (04/20/2009 07:31:03 AM)
    P_MODE ==> ALL
    P_STOP_ID ==> is NULL
    P_DELIVERY_ID ==> 2888
    P_LOG_LEVEL ==> 1
    p_organization_id ==> 381
    p_stops_per_batch ==> 1
    INTERFACETRIPSTOP: FINDING STOP FOR DELIVERY_ID 2888
    l_stop_id ==> 3031
    InterfaceTripStop: processing stop_id 3031 for INV OM DSNO
    l_inv_interface ==> 1
    l_om_interface ==> 1
    l_dsno_interface ==> 1
    l_interface_mode ==> INV OM DSNO
    l_stop_id ==> 3031
    l_override_wf ==> N
    Ship to Deliver Workflow is enabled for one or more deliveries related to this Stop ==>
    Ship to Deliver Workflow is enabled for one or more deliveries related to this S
    top
    Interface_All: skipping stop_id 3031
    ========================================================================
    l_stops_count ==> 0
    InterfaceTripStop: no stop is processed because no lines are eligble for interfa
    cing.
    errbuf ==> Interface trip stop is completed with warning
    retcode ==> 1
    l_completion_status ==> WARNING
    Exiting WSH_SHIP_CONFIRM_ACTIONS.INTERFACE_ALL (04/20/2009 07:31:03 AM, .01 seconds)
    Automatic clean up ==>
    l_recs = 0 ==>
    errbuf ==> Interface trip stop is completed with warning
    retcode ==> 1
    l_completion_status ==> NORMAL
    Exiting WSH_SHIP_CONFIRM_ACTIONS.INTERFACE_ALL_WRP (04/20/2009 07:31:03 AM, .03 seconds)
    ************Summary of Shipping API Calls************
    WSH_SHIP_CONFIRM_ACTIONS.INTERFACE_ALL_WRP : 1 calls : .03 seconds
    WSH_SHIP_CONFIRM_ACTIONS.INTERFACE_ALL : 1 calls : .01 seconds
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    Jyoti
    Edited by: Jyoti.Mohanty on Apr 20, 2009 2:46 AM

    Hi,
    This problem is documented in 785934.1 (Metalink doc).
    Summary of the solution is given below. Please make sure you read the above document to confirm that the solution applies to your environment.
    1. Go into the responsibility: System Administrator.
    2. Navigate to Profile > System.
    3. Query the profile option 'WSH: Override Ship to Deliver Workflow' and set this value to 'Yes'
    at the Site Level.
    4. Retest the issue.
    5. Migrate the solution as appropriate to other environments

  • I am having trouble updating iTunes 10.7- it downloads about 70% then stops and says error. What can I do to update??

    I am having trouble updating iTunes 10.7- it downloads about 70% then stops and says error. What can I do to update??

    I'd first try downloading an installer from the Apple website using a different web browser:
    http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/
    If you use Firefox instead of IE for the download (or vice versa), do you get a working installer?

  • About interface mapping

    what are there case about interface mapping?
    i knew that the following:
    outbound to inbound
    abstract to abstract.
    what else the case?

    Hi joy zheng  ,
    These r the details about interface mapping :
    Interface Mappings
    You can define mappings for an interface pair (source and target interface) by using message interfaces and message types in the Integration Repository.You can also define the corresponding mappings when the source or target interface is an IDoc, an RFC, or another interface connected by an adapter.
    When defining mapping programs for request, response, or fault messages, the definition is first separated from the interfaces that reference the corresponding message types. Furthermore, you can reuse a message type for multiple interfaces. This means that the simple definition of a mapping program is not sufficient to establish a connection (that is based on the assignment of outbound and inbound interfaces).
    This role is undertaken by the interface mapping:
    ●     An interface mapping specifies the corresponding mapping programs for request, response, or fault messages for a selected interface pair. You use an interface mapping to register mappings for an interface pair.
    ●     You can also specify multiple mapping programs to be executed one after the other in the case of requests and responses for an interface mapping.
    You can also define multiple interface mappings for the same interface pair, to provide multiple variants in the Integration Repository. At configuration time, the customer can select the appropriate mapping in an interface determination and save it in the Integration Directory
    Use :
    Interface mappings register your mapping program for an interface pair in the Integration Repository. If you require a mapping at runtime, it is sufficient to select the interface mapping for the interface pair at configuration time . The Integration Server uses the interface mapping to identify associated mapping programs for request messages, response messages, fault messages, or all three.
    Features
    Executing Multiple Mapping Programs for One Direction
    By using an interface mapping you can execute multiple mapping programs consecutively for the transformation of a request or response message. In such cases, an interface mapping comprises multiple steps for which the following applies:
    ●     The steps are executed in the sequence specified (from top to bottom). The result of the mapping program from the previous step is forwarded to the mapping program of the subsequent step.
    ●     Each step can reference a mapping program that executes a 1:1, 1:n, n:1, or an m:n transformation. In the case of multi-mappings (1:n, n:1, or m:n), the previous step must create the same number of messages that the subsequent step expects.
    ●     Multi-mappings use one envelope to put all messages in one structure. If one of the steps references a multi-mapping program, all subsequent steps must use the same envelope.
    The mapping for a request message comprises two message mapping programs: one 1:1 transformation and one 1:n transformation. Since the latter message mapping uses the multi-mapping envelope for both the target message and the source message, the message mapping for the 1:1 transformation must also create a transformation result with a multi-mapping envelope.
    You do not strictly need to divide up one direction of the whole mapping into different steps. However, this enables all the message formats in one system landscape to be mapped to a central message format, for example. This results in less mapping programs being required because you no longer need to be able to map all the different message formats to each other.
    Activities
           1.      Create your interface mapping on the design maintenance screen of the Integration Builder (see also: Creating an Object).
    You can also create multiple interface mappings for the same interface pair.
           2.      Enter the source and target interfaces that require a mapping of the request message, the response message, the fault message, or all three, in the table of the same name. The following restrictions apply:
    ○     If you want to use the interface mapping in a transformation step in an integration process, you must only specify abstract message interfaces. Furthermore, all objects (integration process, interface mapping, and all objects referenced by the interface mapping) must be in the same software component version. If you want to reference objects from underlying software component versions, you must access the objects from the Basis Objects branch (in the navigation tree or using an input help) (see also: Underlying Software Component Versions).
    ○     If you want to map multiple messages to each other by using a multi-mapping, you can only specify asynchronous interfaces (for further restrictions, see: Multi-Mappings). If any message interfaces are missing, you can also create them by using the functionCreate New Object ().
    If the interface cannot be imported or cannot be created in the Integration Repository (in the case of an external adapter, for example), you must enter the interface names manually. However, it is not possible to check the technical name in this case.
           3.      To import the properties of the interfaces, choose Read Interfaces. The table in the lower area displays tab pages for the request message, response message, and if available, for the fault message, for each mode of the interfaces (either synchronous or asynchronous).
           4.      To develop an external mapping program, export the XSD schema of the respective request or response message as a zip file after you have imported the interfaces. The zip file can contain multiple schema files that reference each other, for example in a multi-mapping. In this case, the schema with the global message element has the name MainSchema.
           5.      To reference a mapping program for the respective message, you have the following options:
    ○     Select an existing mapping program from the Integration Repository by using the input help (). If this is a message mapping, the default setting of the input help only displays those message mappings that are found using the source and target message in the Integration Repository (in multi-mappings, the first source and target messages are used as the search criteria). However, you can also display any number of message mappings, for example, because you are constructing a mapping from several mapping programs with intermediate instances which have no message types.
    ○     You can create message mappings directly from the interface mapping. To do this, select the mapping type Message Mapping in the Type column. Position the cursor in the Name column and choose the function Create New Message Mapping () in the Mapping Program frame. The Integration Builder copies the specifications of the messages and their occurrence directly from the interface mapping.
    An interface mapping can only reference mapping programs that belong to the same or an underlying software component version of the interface mapping. This ensures that the mapping program can be shipped together with the interface mapping (see: Software Logistics).
           6.      If you are not using a mapping for a fault message, you can execute multiple mapping programs in succession for request and response messages:
    ○     To insert an additional line for a mapping program, choose .
    ○     To delete the registration for a mapping program, choose .
    At runtime, the mapping programs are executed from top to bottom.
           7.      Save the interface mapping.
    The following web-site gives complete details about interface mapping :
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/12/05731a10264057badc32d3d3957015/content.htm
    **********Please reward points if u find this useful
    cheers,
    gyanaraj

  • Question about Interface

    Hi everyone,
    I have a question about interface :
    an interface can only have abstract methods, right ?
    so how come ResultSet (which is an interface) has methods like next() which can't be abstract otherwise it wouldn't do anything ?
    thanks for answering !

    an interface can only have abstract methods, right ?Yes. All methods in an interface are inherently public and abstract.
    so how come ResultSet (which is an interface) has
    methods like next() which can't be abstract otherwise
    it wouldn't do anything ?It defines the next() method for classes that implement the interface. When you get a ResultSet reference returned from a method call, you're not getting a reference to an interface; you're getting a reference to an object that implements that interface (or null, as the case may be).

  • Doubt about interface & abstract

    Hai everybody,
    I am new java technology. I need clear discribtion about interface & abstract.
    Please give some examples and differentiate it.
    i awaiting for your reply
    by
    azhar

    Even Wikipedia has info about this:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interface_%28Java%29
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_%28computer_science
    %29#Abstract_and_concrete_classeswhenever someone asks this question, they don't really want to read about it, they just want someone to tell them the secret rules about when to use an interface and when to use an abstract class. but we're not telling :-)

  • Docs about Interfaces between CO and BW/BI

    Hi all Gurus,
    I am just looking for documents about Interfaces between FI/CO and BW/BI. Can any body provide me the required documents. It is very urgent....  [email protected]
    Thanks in advance
    SIM
    Edited by: SIM on Feb 22, 2008 12:19 PM

    Hi
    You are right. I meant the interfaces between FI/CO and BW/BI. Namely how do we build the Interfaces such as IDOC and other interfaces between them. I need practice oriented docs with all steps towards building interfaces.
    Thanks
    SIM

  • About Cisco switches, some of their interface are stop working what can i do?

    Here in my company there are Cisco small business SF300 series, small business switches and Cisco 2960 Enterprise switches. The problem is after some time their fastEthernet port has stopped working. How can i resolve this issue? I have tried to reset the small business one but i couldn't get any change. please can i get some one from Cisco help to resolve this issue?

    What is the status of the interfaces ? Are they up and connected ?
    Once you hit the problem how do you recover ?  Do you do a shut/no-shut ?
    What to logs in the switches suggest ? Lookout for ports going to err-disabled state or something ?

  • Need information about interfaces and namespaces in actionscript 3.0

    Hi,
    I need information about actionscript interfaces and
    namespaces, I'm preparing for ACE for Flash CS3 and I need to learn
    about this subjects and I can not find resources or simple examples
    that make these subjects understandable.
    Anybody can help me!
    Thanks a lot.

    Interfaces (cont.)
    Perhaps the most useful feature of interfaces is that you not
    only can define the data type but also method signature of the
    class that implements this interface. In other words, interface can
    define and enforce what methods class MUST implement. This is very
    useful when classes are branching in packages and team of
    developers works on a large application among others.
    The general syntax for an Interface with method signatures is
    written the following way:
    package{
    public interface InterfaceName {
    // here we specify the methods that will heave to be
    implemented
    function method1 (var1:dataType,
    var2:datType,…):returnType;
    function method2 (var1:dataType,
    var2:datType,…):returnType;
    To the previous example:
    package{
    public interface IQualified {
    function method1 ():void;
    function method2 ():int;
    Let’s write a class that implements it.
    If I just write:
    package{
    public class ClassOne extends DisplayObject implements
    IQualified {
    public function ClassOne(){}
    I will get a compilation error that states that I did not
    implement required by the interface methods.
    Now let’s implement only one method:
    package{
    public class ClassOne extends DisplayObject implements
    IQualified {
    private function method1():void{
    return;
    public function ClassOne(){}
    I will get the error again because I implemented only one out
    of two required methods.
    Now let’s implement all of them:
    package{
    public class ClassOne extends DisplayObject implements
    IQualified {
    private function method1():void{
    return;
    private function method2():int{
    return 4;
    public function ClassOne(){}
    Now everything works OK.
    Now let’s screw with return datatypes. I attempt to
    return String instead of void in method1 in ClassOne:
    private function method1():String{
    return “blah”;
    I am getting an error again – Interface requires that
    the method1 returns void.
    Now let’s attempt to pass something into the method1:
    private function method1(obj:MovieClip):void{
    return;
    Oops! An error again. Interface specified that the function
    doesn’t accept any parameters.
    Now rewrite the interface:
    package{
    public interface IQualified {
    function method1 (obj:MovieClip):void;
    function method2 ():int;
    Now compiler stops complaining.
    But, if we revert the class back to:
    private function method1():void{
    return;
    compiler starts complaining again because we don’t pass
    any parameters into the function.
    The point is that interface is sort of a set of rules. In a
    simple language, if it is stated:
    public class ClassOne implements IQualified
    it says: “I, class ClassOne, pledge to abide by all the
    rules that IQualified has established and I will not function
    correctly if I fail to do so in any way. (IMPORTANT) I can do more,
    of course, but NOT LESS.”
    Of course the class that implements an interface can have
    more that number of methods the corresponding interface requires
    – but never less.
    MORE means that in addition to any number of functions it can
    implement as many interfaces as it is desired.
    For instance, I have three interfaces:
    package{
    public interface InterfaceOne {
    function method1 ():void;
    function method2 ():int;
    package{
    public interface InterfaceTwo {
    function method3 ():void;
    package{
    public interface InterfaceThree{
    function method4 ():void;
    If our class promises to implement all three interface it
    must have all four classes in it’s signature:
    package{
    public class ClassOne extends DisplayObject implements
    InterfaceOne, InterfaceTwi, InterfaceThree{
    private function method1():void{return;}
    private function method2():int{return 4;}
    private function method3():void{return;}
    private function method4():void{return;}
    public function ClassOne(){}
    Hope it helps.

Maybe you are looking for