RAID status in Conky

I wrote a tiny script to monitor the status of RAID arrays. It is written in awk and is meant to be used with conky. I have this in my conky config file:
RAID: ${execi 60 gawk -f path-to-the-script /proc/mdstat}
#!/bin/gawk -f
# This script checks the status of RAID arrays from /proc/mdstat
/_/ { state = "Warning!"; exit }
/blocks/ { state = $NF }
END { print state }
If everything is working correctly the ouput will be: "RAID: [UU]". It means that both drives are Up and running.
If there is something wrong with the drive it will give an error message: "RAID: [WARNING!]".
Maybe someone will find this usefull.

Thanks!
I have multiple RAIDs so I used the following command to check the status of a specific RAID:
${execi 60 cat /proc/mdstat | grep md126 -A 1 | gawk -f path-to-the-script --}
(replace md126 with the array you want to check)

Similar Messages

  • Has anyone upgraded the Ironport ESA to 8.5.6-074 and had the issues of Raid status showing unknown?

    Has anyone upgraded the Ironport ESA to 8.5.6-074 and had the issues of Raid status showing unknown? After we upgraded our appliances we are having issues with our ESA appliances showing the RAID status as unknown. When we reported the issue to CISCO we were updated there were no issues reported at all. Could anyone please confirm if you have experienced the same issue. 

    You should see OPTIMAL - meaning the drives in the C170 are in good health/status:
    myc680.local> version
    Current Version
    ===============
    UDI: C680 V FCH1611V0B2
    Name: C680
    Product: Cisco IronPort C680 Messaging Gateway(tm) Appliance
    Model: C680
    Version: 8.5.6-074
    Build Date: 2014-07-21
    Install Date: 2014-07-29 11:16:34
    Serial #: xxx-yyy1611Vzzz
    BIOS: C240M3.1.4.5.2.STBU
    RAID: 3.220.75-2196, 5.38.00_4.12.05.00_0x05180000
    RAID Status: Optimal
    RAID Type: 10
    BMC: 1.05
    There are times post-reboot, that you'll see and get notification of RAID sub-optimal --- meaning that the appliance is running through on a health-check of the appliance's RAID.  You should be getting a notification once RAID status has returned to OPTIMAL, or as per the older OS revisions, READY:
    myc170.local> version
    Current Version
    ===============
    UDI: C170 V01 FCH1428V06A
    Name: C170
    Description: Cisco IronPort C170
    Product: Cisco IronPort C170 Messaging Gateway(tm) Appliance
    Model: C170
    Version: 7.6.3-019
    Build Date: 2013-06-09
    Install Date: 2014-09-12 13:52:24
    Serial #: xxxxxxD87B39-yyyyyy8V06A
    BIOS: 9B1C115A
    RAID: 02
    RAID Status: READY
    RAID Type: 1
    BMC: 2.01

  • My Duo 12TB says RAID Status: Cannot Access Data

    When I started up my computer today, My Duo 12TB (Raid 1 Mirrored) came up with a RAID error.  When I ran WD Drive Utilities program, it gives status:  RAID Status Cannot Access Data   Drive 1 Status  OnlineDrive 2 Status  Online I have tried unplugging both the power and the USB connections.  Restarted computer. What needs to be done to fix this without lossing any Data on the HDs.Thanks,

     
    Hi, 
    Welcome to the WD Community.
    As a recommendation, please contact WD Support for direct assistance on this case.
    WD contact info: 
    http://support.wdc.com/country/index.asp?lang=en%22
     

  • WSA RAID Status: Degraded

    Hi,
       I Have the next status on WSA
    RAID Status:
    Degraded
    Any idea how to get Optimal ?

    Hello Oscar,
    Please try rebooting the appliance and leave it for a day for the raid to rebuild. If the raid still does not re-build there might be  a possible disk issue, kindly open a TAC case.
    Regards,
    Puja

  • Disk utility says "RAID STATUS: Disk missing"?

    When I boot up OS 10.3.9 there is error message "detected volume OS X cannot read - initialize, ignore or eject" - then it dissappears and the system drive behaves normally. But in disk utitlity it says "RAID STATUS: Disk missing".
    The disk is not partitioned and it will not let me repair permissions. Any ideas?

    Disk Utility monitors the status of the disks in a RAID set. If you see a message indicating that a disk is missing or has failed, try these troubleshooting steps:
    If you are using a striped RAID set, delete the damaged RAID set. Your data may be lost. Be sure to back up your RAID sets and other data regularly.
    If you are using a mirrored RAID set, there may have been an error writing data to the disk. Click Rebuild in the RAID pane of Disk Utility.
    If a problem persists, replace the damaged disk and click Rebuild to rebuild the RAID set.
    Use the First Aid pane to repair the RAID disk, then check the RAID set to see if it still reports an error. If the problem is still present, quit and reopen Disk Utility, select the RAID disk, and click RAID. Check the RAID set to see if it still reports an error. You may need to restart your computer.
    iBook G4   Mac OS X (10.3.9)  

  • [SOLVED] RAID status

    Last night I created a raid5 array using mdadm and 5 x 3TB hdd's.  I let the sync happen overnight and on returning home this evening
    watch -d cat /proc/mdstat
    returned:
    Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
    md0 : active raid5 sda1[0] sdc1[2] sde1[5] sdb1[1] sdd1[3]
    11720536064 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/5] [UUUUU]
    bitmap: 2/22 pages [8KB], 65536KB chunk
    unused devices: <none>
    which to me pretty much looks like the array sync is completed.
    I then updated the config file, assembled the array and formatted it using:
    mdadm --detail --scan >> /etc/mdadm.conf
    mdadm --assemble --scan
    mkfs.ext4 -v -L offsitestorage -b 4096 -E stride=128,stripe-width=512 /dev/md0
    Running
    mdadm --detail /dev/md0
    returns:
    /dev/md0:
    Version : 1.2
    Creation Time : Thu Apr 17 01:13:52 2014
    Raid Level : raid5
    Array Size : 11720536064 (11177.57 GiB 12001.83 GB)
    Used Dev Size : 2930134016 (2794.39 GiB 3000.46 GB)
    Raid Devices : 5
    Total Devices : 5
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent
    Intent Bitmap : Internal
    Update Time : Thu Apr 17 18:55:01 2014
    State : active
    Active Devices : 5
    Working Devices : 5
    Failed Devices : 0
    Spare Devices : 0
    Layout : left-symmetric
    Chunk Size : 512K
    Name : audioliboffsite:0 (local to host audioliboffsite)
    UUID : aba348c6:8dc7b4a7:4e282ab5:40431aff
    Events : 11306
    Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
    0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1
    1 8 17 1 active sync /dev/sdb1
    2 8 33 2 active sync /dev/sdc1
    3 8 49 3 active sync /dev/sdd1
    5 8 65 4 active sync /dev/sde1
    So, I'm now left wondering why the state of the array isn't "clean"?  Is it normal for arrays to show a state of "active" instead of clean under Arch?
    Last edited by audiomuze (2014-07-02 20:10:33)

    Contrasting two RAID5 arrays - the first created in Arch, the second in Ubuntu Server.  Both were created using the same command set (the only differences being number of drives and stride optimised for number of drives).  Why the difference in status out of the starting blocks?  I've not been able to find anything in the documentation or reading mdadm's manpage to explain this.  If there's additional info required in order to assist please let me know and I'll provide same.
    Thx in advance for considering and assistance.
    /dev/md0:
    Version : 1.2
    Creation Time : Thu Apr 17 01:13:52 2014
    Raid Level : raid5
    Array Size : 11720536064 (11177.57 GiB 12001.83 GB)
    Used Dev Size : 2930134016 (2794.39 GiB 3000.46 GB)
    Raid Devices : 5
    Total Devices : 5
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent
    Intent Bitmap : Internal
    Update Time : Mon May 5 05:35:28 2014
    State : active
    Active Devices : 5
    Working Devices : 5
    Failed Devices : 0
    Spare Devices : 0
    Layout : left-symmetric
    Chunk Size : 512K
    Name : audioliboffsite:0
    UUID : aba348c6:8dc7b4a7:4e282ab5:40431aff
    Events : 11307
    Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
    0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1
    1 8 17 1 active sync /dev/sdb1
    2 8 33 2 active sync /dev/sdc1
    3 8 49 3 active sync /dev/sdd1
    5 8 65 4 active sync /dev/sde1
    /dev/md0:
    Version : 1.2
    Creation Time : Sun Feb 2 21:40:15 2014
    Raid Level : raid5
    Array Size : 8790400512 (8383.18 GiB 9001.37 GB)
    Used Dev Size : 2930133504 (2794.39 GiB 3000.46 GB)
    Raid Devices : 4
    Total Devices : 4
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent
    Update Time : Mon May 5 06:45:45 2014
    State : clean
    Active Devices : 4
    Working Devices : 4
    Failed Devices : 0
    Spare Devices : 0
    Layout : left-symmetric
    Chunk Size : 512K
    Name : fileserver:0 (local to host fileserver)
    UUID : 8389cd99:a86f705a:15c33960:9f1d7cbe
    Events : 208
    Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
    0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1
    1 8 17 1 active sync /dev/sdb1
    2 8 33 2 active sync /dev/sdc1
    4 8 49 3 active sync /dev/sdd1

  • TS130 RAID Status

    I am running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Server on a headless TS130. I've got my operating system on a single SSD and my data on a RAID Array consisting of two 2TB drives in a RAID 1 configuration.
    Everything is running perfectly, however I am wondering how I would know if there is a problem with the RAID Array... for instance if one of the drives failed and needed to be swapped out, how do I know? Ubuntu recognizes the drives as a RAID array, but there is not a "driver" or a utiility for checking the status of the hardware RAID Array.
    Thanks in advance for your help!

    I believe upon boot, it will flash a screen looking similar to your BIOS that gives the status of your raid configuration, It only holds for a few seconds but the text is either Green, Yellow, or I assume red based off of the status.

  • Monitoring Raid Status on SRE-910 module in 3945 router

    I'm at my wits end here.  We just recently purchased a 3945 ISR G2 router and have a SRE-910 module (with two hard drives) configured in a Raid 1.  We are running a stand-alone version of ESXi on the service module and I'm trying to figure out how to monitor the status of the Raid on the drives (along with other health issues).  SNMP has revealed nothing so far and even opening a support case for which MIB's to use has proved fruitless.  All the documents I find on monitoring the modules say to use LMS which is now Cisco Prime.  I've downloaded the trial copy, put in the SNMP settings and scanned the router.  I get device results and it shows that I have the SRE-910 module installed, but I get no other configuration / device informaiton from the module itself.
    I tried to create a new Monitoring template using the NAM health as the base template (which I'm assuming this is the correct template).  Unfortunately, when I acutally try to deploy the template against the discovered router, I get an 'Unexpected end of list' error which makes me assume I'm still doing something wrong.  I ANYONE out there monitoring the device health of their service modules in a 3945 router?  What am I missing????

    Oh, and by the way, I tried to monitor this through the ESXi host / vCenter, but even after pulling one of the hard drives from the module, neither software detected that there was an issue.  That is why I'm assuming that this will have to be monitored on the router side somehow.

  • RAID status: degraded or failed? is there help?

    We are using mac os sever 10.4.3. When we recently restarted the servers we noticed that 2 drives on each of the servers has yellow warning lights showing on the moitor software but not on the actual drives themselves. We have 2 servers one a G4 and the other a G5. The G4 has 2 drives and both are registering yellow, the G5 has 4 drivers with 2 registering yellow. The monitor says the drives are "degraded" but everything seems to be transferring and backing up fine. Should we do a backup and use Disk Utility to repair the degraded/damaged drives?
    Mac OS Server   Mac OS X (10.4.3)   Processor 2 GHz G5 Memory 2 GB

    You must have RAID 1 mirrored drives setup then and are running from the working disk of the mirrored pair.
    Ofcourse you should fix these types of problems/failing disks.
    Having recent backups is always a good thing. A RAID doesn't save you from human errors but it should prevent "downed" servers.
    Your supposed to be able to repair a degraded mirror from within Disk Utility but I have only done it from the CLI (Terminal) diskutil.
    If you do a : sudo diskutil checkraid
    What do you get?
    If the servers are updated from 10.3.x you can (if not done already) also update the RAID version from the older ver. 1 to ver. 2 available from 10.4.0-> using the command:
    sudo diskutil convertraid

  • Status of RAID

    I have a MAC PRO 8 Core with MAC OS Server, and I have configured two raid, but I need to know if RAID status is OK, now I use a command line, I have executed diskutil checkraid, but I need an automatic system that when any error acourrs send an email, message, because I can't execute every day manually this command, I need an automatic system
    What can I do? It is possible to send for mail every day with the result of this command? Exist any other option?
    Thanks

    I guess it is time to let the cat out of the bag. For the past few months I have been running a homemade script on my Tiger server to do precisely what it sounds like you are asking for. I have verified that this works also with Leopard Server. If you would like, you could head over to my site and read up on and if desired, use checkraid. It is completely free for use. Hope this helps!
    Peter Scordamaglia

  • Disk Utility RAID Issue

    I'm trying to determine if the problems that I'm encountering are a software issue or a hardware issue.
    I'm setting up a Mac Pro with Leopard and have four Maxtor 6G160E0 160GB hard drives that I'm trying to set up as two Mirrored drive sets. Everything seemed to go fine, created the two mirror sets, installed Leopard, configured and tested two user accounts and Office 2004, then updated everything to the latest version. When done I shut it down planning on moving it to it's final home tonight.
    But, when I turned it on both mirror sets were degraded - all four drives were still recognized as RAID slices but came up as failed in the RAID tab. I saw no errors reported in the log so I assumed that those two drives were faulty. I shut down, moved the good drives to bays 1 & 2 and rebooted.
    First reboot gave me a prohibition symbol instead of the usual Apple. Powered down and on and it booted fine but the second drive came up as a failed RAID slice. Rebooted again and both were fine.
    I reinstalled the two "failed" drives and reformatted them - both reformatted fine and mounted without problems. I unmounted the new partition just in case, but, when I tried to rebuild the RAIDs I get the following in the error log:
    11/1/07 7:26:00 PM Disk Utility[141] Preparing to erase : “Untitled”
    11/1/07 7:26:00 PM Disk Utility[141] Partition Scheme: GUID Partition Table
    11/1/07 7:26:00 PM Disk Utility[141] 1 volume will be created
    11/1/07 7:26:00 PM Disk Utility[141] Name : “Untitled”
    11/1/07 7:26:00 PM Disk Utility[141] Size : 149.1 GB
    11/1/07 7:26:00 PM Disk Utility[141] Filesystem : Mac OS Extended (Journaled)
    11/1/07 7:26:00 PM Disk Utility[141] Creating partition map.
    11/1/07 7:26:03 PM Disk Utility[141] Formatting disk1s2 as Mac OS Extended (Journaled) with name Untitled.
    11/1/07 7:26:06 PM Disk Utility[141] Erase complete.
    11/1/07 7:26:12 PM Disk Utility[141] Unmount of “Untitled” succeeded
    11/1/07 7:26:31 PM Disk Utility[141] Rebuilding RAID
    11/1/07 7:26:31 PM Disk Utility[141] Filesystem: Mac OS Extended (Journaled)
    11/1/07 7:26:31 PM Disk Utility[141] RAID type: Mirrored RAID Set
    11/1/07 7:26:31 PM Disk Utility[141] RAID set name: “Yorktown”
    11/1/07 7:26:31 PM Disk Utility[141] RAID set status before rebuild: “”
    11/1/07 7:26:31 PM Disk Utility[141] RAID chunk size: 32K (default)
    11/1/07 7:26:31 PM Disk Utility[141] Mirror Auto Rebuild: Disabled (default)
    11/1/07 7:26:31 PM Disk Utility[141] 2 members
    11/1/07 7:26:31 PM Disk Utility[141] RAID Slice (disk0s2) - Online
    11/1/07 7:26:31 PM Disk Utility[141] Maxtor 6G160E0 Media (disk1) - New
    11/1/07 7:26:32 PM Disk Utility[141] Error rebuilding RAID: Unrecognized Filesystem.
    11/1/07 7:26:33 PM Disk Utility[141] RAID failed: Unrecognized Filesystem.
    I'm at a loss at the moment. I am leaning towards bad drives, but FOUR bad drives all at once is suspicious.
    I've searched for similar issues and found none so I thought I'd check here and see if anyone had any ideas.

    G'day Zeekm,
    Thank you for that. I did this and it seems to work. The Disk Utility GUI does not seem to work.
    Hope this helps some one,
    #Checked the RAID status
    root# diskutil checkRAID
    RAID SETS
    ===============================================================================
    Name: Server_HD
    Unique ID: 7E31E20E-F53D-4D76-AD37-139C4E1440AB
    Type: Mirror
    Status: Degraded
    Size: 1000070610944 B
    Device Node: disk2
    Apple RAID Version: 2
    # Device Node UUID Status
    0 disk1s3 BAC72F86-B05F-4B0F-97D3-58A6207E7DFA Failed
    1 disk0s3 2BFB55BB-EFF9-438C-A1F9-A8ED7A93D385 Online
    ===============================================================================
    #Told it to resync
    root# diskutil repairMirror disk2 disk1s3
    Note: Syncing data between mirror partitions can take a very long time.
    Note: The mirror should now be repairing itself. You can check its status using 'diskutil listRAID'.
    temp:~ root# diskutil listRAID
    RAID SETS
    ===============================================================================
    Name: Server_HD
    Unique ID: 7E31E20E-F53D-4D76-AD37-139C4E1440AB
    Type: Mirror
    Status: Degraded
    Size: 1000070610944 B
    Device Node: disk2
    Apple RAID Version: 2
    # Device Node UUID Status
    0 disk1s3 9D955C85-7EC0-4E92-848A-62D9F7C12EED 0% (Rebuilding)
    1 disk0s3 2BFB55BB-EFF9-438C-A1F9-A8ED7A93D385 Online
    ===============================================================================
    Hope this helps,
    Cheers,
    Arthur

  • UCSM 2.1 Local disk configuration policy and raid volumes

    Hi!
    If i use Any configuration as local disk configuration policy and do the raid settings directly to the RAID-cards, am i able to have two raid volumes on C-series under UCSM management?
    What i would like to do with C240M3 with 6 local disks: 2 disk raid1 and 4 disk raid0
    So i would use:
    "Any Configuration—For a server configuration that carries forward the local disk configuration without any changes."
    As UCS servers Raid guide indicates:
    "Maximum of One RAID Volume and One RAID Controller in Integrated Rack-Mount Servers
    A rack-mount server that has been integrated with Cisco UCS Manager can  have a maximum of one RAID volume irrespective of how many hard drives  are present on the server. "
    Is this paragraph limitation of GUI not able to set several volumes or hard fact without "Any configuration" workaround?

    I did some testing about this issue:
    Changed Local Disk Configuration to "Any Configuration"
    Two virtual disks can be created from Raid card's WebBIOS
    These disks are visible to RedHat Installation.
    UCSM shows Any configuration for the Storage Local Disk policy
    Actual Disk Configuration has faulty information - WebBios is the only place to check the RAID status?
    Next step: I'll do the same for the production

  • Mac Mini and WD My Book Duo RAID drives not mounting?

    I have two of these My Book Duo drives connected via USB to my Mac Mini (late 2012), running OSX 10.9.5.
    The drives are both configured as RAID 1, one has my iTunes and other media, the second one is the Time Machine backup disk. Last night when I restarted my computer neither drive mounted. I got an OSX error "THe disk is not readable" and a WD error "RAID stripe set has failed" box.
    When I open the WD drive utilities I can't run any of the Diagnostics and the RAID Management tab says "RAID Status: Unknown" and suggests that I re-configure the drives.
    I don't want to do that, obviously, as there is a total of over 3TB of data on both drives! It's suspicious that BOTH drives failed to mount at the same time... sounds like some software problem perhaps? I am posting here because it might be an OSX or local software problem?
    I have updated the firmware on both drives and power-cycled them, restarted the computer several times, the usual things, but no luck.  On a whim I tried updating the firmware a second time and got a different error in the firmware updater: "The drive is locked."
    Any thoughts on what I could try?  I've opened a Support Case with WD but oftentimes other users can be even more helpful!  ;-)
    Thanks, David

    Hi, Thank you for the reply but I am definitely exactly one of those more Enterprise customers and my point is that your implementation is flawed and should be fixed because of course one of the reasons I bought the WD My Book Duo is because of encryption, but I want to own my encryption key and be able to decrypt my own data not have it hijacked. So I'm a little bit confused by your answer, is the official WD response that it acknowledges the worrysome problems I outlined but that there will be no plan to fix these issues? I am an IT consultant myself making recommendations for clients especially dealing with security. How can I recommend to "anyone" to use a product that seems to not care about preventing unnecessary data loss. It is not impossible nor even difficult for WD to fix this problem, to allow customers to access their own data off of their hard drives in case their "drive enclosure" develops problems or 'dies'. As I have already outlined, there are at least two ways or more that WD can fix this: 1. Allow enabling or disabling of the Encryption.And/OR2. Allow Exporting/Saving of the Encryption Key which we can then use with software to decrypt our hard drives in case of problems arising with our drive enclosure. Ideally the solution should include method #2 listed above so that we can enjoy the Encryption feature for which we purchased your products with assurance that we will NOT be locked out of our data for no good reason. I hope WD will consider taking a close look at this issue since it may at some point find itself with a lot of very angry customers when their WD My Book duos or other similar encrypted "drive enclosures" fail and people end up with perfectly functioning hard drives with data on them that they won't be able to access. Looking forward to a solution. 

  • RAID 0 Roaming Disk Problem -  Way To Recover?

    I have the problem generally described in this archieved thread [RAID 0|discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2041271&tstart=-3] and will describe it below, the thread is more for point of reference.
    A few days ago the RAID went down (RAID 0)along the same lines described in this thread [RAID Error|http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2141573&tstart=0]
    which in a nutshell, threw this error
    Drive 3:5000cca349e4743d missing - Replace immediately or acknowledge loss of RAID set RS1 and associated volumes.
    I immediatelly pulled out all the hard drives and cloned them in external hardware enclosures. At that point none of the drives had a fail message. During putting the drives back in I noticed that a drive sled looked slightly warped and would not fit back in properly. When the sled was in the drive would not show up, although two of the drives appeared as "roaming."
    Got new sleds, and put the drives in. Could not get it the machine to boot in Safe Mode or properly from an external drive which was hooked up via Firewire (This was the system drive at the time of the freeze. It showed up as bootable when holding down the option key) or the clone of that system when placed in the machine. (I was on the phone for awhile with Apple Tach Support, and by the end it seemed it was a RAID card issue.) So I made an appointment for the Apple Genius Bar. I pulled out the old system drive with data, images and the rest and did a bare bones install of 10.5.1 (which came with the machine) and rebooted before bringing it into the Store, and the computer booted fine.
    The "problem" RAID set was paritioned into two volumes. On my reboot after the install of the OS (and without using the RAID Utility to change anything, the RAID drives were simply in their bays), the two volumes are still there, sort of, as R2V1 and R2V2. Additionally all the drives SMART Status and RAID status are fine. One of the three drives is roaming however,
    was and is being reported as RS1. Additionally, each of the drives in the RAID reports SMART status as fine, and each of the three drives report a RAID status of good. Additionally the RAID 0 had two volumes and both are reported currently as R2V1 and R2V2 and as being "good" and one of the drives has status of roaming. This is the furthest I have gotten trying to save this. I did not want to shut down the machine on the off chance that there is something else I can do right now before bringing the machine into the store.
    The following pictures may make it easier to follow
    !http://www.dvdstepbystep.com/Raid2.jpg!
    !http://www.dvdstepbystep.com/raid.jpg!
    The tower is an Early 2008 tower and I upgraded the firmware on the RAID card with the newest firmware, which required 10.5.8. The base install is back to 10.5.1 on the reboot after reinstall. I am also waiting to hear back from tech support.
    Didn't realize the Apple RAID Card had a bad rep until this happened. Sheesh. Missed that one
    But if there is anything to try right now, it would be great.

    A A P L wrote:
    Good luck.
    Thanks
    I know that I have been pretty happy, and when I did lose one drive, it did what it was supposed to do.
    I did have it RAID 5 at one point, but set it up for internal RAID 0 for the renders, and it has been fine for a long time. Urgh.
    Early on, there were battery warnings all the time, and the battery did not charge unless the Mac was ON, which was totally stupid.
    Hmmm, sounds alot like mine there.
    I found that out two Christmas vacations ago when we do our two-week shutdown.
    Came back in, and could not use the Mac for two days while it charged.
    They've since changed it, and thankfully, it's been good since.
    Good luck, let us know how the new card works out.
    SB
    Thanks again and will do. Bought a bunch more hard drives and if it comes back, the first thing I do is back up the 2+ Terrabytes plus of renders (all ongoing projects), slap new drives into the tower, make it RAID 5 and to heck with the hit on speed. Have enough externals to reconfigure things, now just keeping fingers crossed

  • Using two external USB drives in RAID 1?

    Is this acceptable? I initially set it up, copied files over only to see one slice degraded. Now I've been trying to rebuild the RAID but it's taking 40 +hours. Seems it would be easier/less time consuming to delete, recreate the RAID and recopy the files.
    But - I wonder if this an acceptable practice or even supported (many posts say IDE or SATA drives).

    Check out the Linksys articles below, if RAID 1 is not running properly then the RAID status would indicate "degraded" and disk health status "failed".
    Checking the Status of Hard Drives
    Creating RAID 1 on the Network Media Hub
    Cheers.

Maybe you are looking for

  • CANT SYNC MY IPOD TOUCH SINCE I JOINED MATCH

    SINCE I SUBSCRIBED TO THE CLOUD I CANT SYNC MY IPOD TOUCH TO MY COMPUTER. I ALSO CANNOT PLAY SONGS IF NOT CONNECTED TO WIFI. HELP!

  • Enter Time Machine?

    i just did my first ever TM backup to an external drive.  When I click on the TM icon at the top right of my screen on of the options is "Enter Time Machine".  What does that mean?  What does that do?

  • Job Prostect for Fresher in ABAP

    Hi All, Please let me know what is the job prospect for freshers in ABAP as I am going through the certification for ABAP from Siemens. I have been going through the forums and is it really hard for a fresher to fetch a job in SAP market. Thanks in A

  • Please suggest some useful links for ABAP APO initial understandings

    Hi Experts, could you please suggest me some links to understand the basis of APO ABAP coding skills and how it is different from normal ABAP coding. Thanks Mamata

  • Recover iDVD 5.0.1

    I have successfully been using iMovieHD and iDVD5.0.1 to make 'movies' out of a sequence of jpegs. Using 720p option. I recently purchased iLife08. Before installing, I saved my old iMovieHD, iDVD5.0.1 and iPhoto in a folder outside of applications.