RAM Hungry

Final Cut Express has been my living **** for the last 2 weeks.
It started with not being able to import any footage (it was bringing the Audio & Video in out of Sync) and now I can't render.
The only way I was able to get the Audio on my System was to use iMovie HD (on a hired Mac) and now that I have spent 26 hours on the edit can't render the entire piece without it failing due to memory errors.
I have discovered that I can do the file one small section at a time, but anything longer than 2 minutes and I get the out of memory error.
I have opened the Activity view and can see Final cut steadily eating all of my RAM until there is nothing left and then the application just locks.
Any advice would be helpful as rendering 2 minutes at a time is proving to be a real headache.

Hmm, where is the hardware test program? I checked under Utilities but could not immediately see it.
And no, I don't have any stills in my production.
I am finding it strange as I rendered the same size project last year with no issue. It did take around an hour to render, but the system just churned through it.
So I am not sure if the RAM is just broken or there is perhaps a bug in the software.

Similar Messages

  • Is Yosemite RAM hungry??

    recently i downloaded, Yosemite on my MacBook Air. i was very happy and tought i should compare how much ram it was using agianst Mavericks. i got shocked!! Yosemite used 3,76 gb of ram of my 4 gb. is it a fail or something? please tell me how to use not so much ram!
    Nick

    If you were very happy until you looked at the numbers that may tell you something about how well Yosemite manages things.

  • Maximum RAM for Mid-2010 iMac 3.2GHz w/ Core i3 Processor?

    I am looking to upgrade the RAM on my iMac. This is the first time I've ever done so and the reason for it is that I'm finally starting to experience some noticeable lag while playing games. I'm not a hardcore gamer by any means but I feel as though the kinds of games I play shouldn't be struggling so much to run. Some examples of games I've played that have had trouble include Amnesia: The Dark Descent and Left 4 Dead. These games came out a few years ago so it's not like I'm pushing the limits of my machine here! I've done quite a bit of research online but I've come across some conflicting reports on the maximum amount of RAM I can install.
    Apple's support files state that the computer can hold up to 16GB of RAM, but then go on to state that this would be equivalent to a 4GB SO-DIMM in each slot. Is that because there are four total slots in my iMac? (See... I told you I'm new at this!)
    At the same time, I've also read that it is possible to install up to 32GB of RAM in this particular model of iMac. Is this actually true?
    Whichever the case may be... can anyone recommend some good, quality, dependable brands of RAM? Because in doing my research I've read a few horror stories about faulty RAM (and no... I'm not planning on shopping on eBay so don't worry!).
    My final question is this: Is upping my RAM actually worth it? As in, will it help my games run smoother and/or better? I ask because I've also wondered if the video card might be the bigger problem (which I hope it's not because I have no idea if it's even possible to replace that).
    Sorry for being so long-winded but I just really want to make sure I do this right and don't waste my money. Thank you in advance for any help! =)

    Your computer has 4 slots. When Apple shipped the computer the largest DIMM shipping was 4GB so Apple advertises 16GB as the max. According to OWC that remains the maximum for your computer, only the i5 and i7 models can be upgrade to 32GB. At this time 16GB should be plenty for most people.
    There are a number of things that have an impact on speed and, of course, one of them is RAM. When your computer first came out the operating system you were using was less RAM hungry. It seems that each new upgrade (or every other OS upgrade) ups the RAM ante. Other things that have an impact are the utilities and programs you run behind the scenes. They can burn up lots of CPU cycles and RAM. Hard drive space is another factor - the operating system and programs need room for temporary files and when this room isn't available the computer slows down. So, are you running anything like anti-malware? Dump it, not needed. Do you have about 25GB of free drive space? If not, free some up.
    Quality RAM - not only what you buy but who you buy it from is important. I go with Crucial or OWC.

  • Will upgrading ram improve speed in Mac and windows (VMware fusion)?

    I Am using VMware fusion for music production and that program requires a lot of workspace. I have a MacBook Pro 4gb ram and when I turn VMware on it goes to 2 gb ram in Mac and 2 gb ram in windows. My Mac speed is normal when VMware fusion is turned off but when I turn it on my Mac is very slow. Will upgrading ram improve speed in mac and also in windows (windows is also very slow)
    Btw my english isn't very good 

    Adding RAM only makes it possible to run more programs concurrently.  It doesn't speed up the computer nor make games run faster.  What it can do is prevent the system from having to use disk-based VM when it runs out of RAM because you are trying to run too many applications concurrently or using applications that are extremely RAM hungry.  It will improve the performance of applications that run mostly in RAM or when loading programs.
    In your case it will most likely help. You should plan on at least 8 GBs or more, depending upon what your model supports.

  • ~500 MB "active or wired" RAM in 10.5 - can I reduce this?

    Hello!
    I have a 15" Powerbook G4, with 1 GB of RAM, running 10.5.1. Previously, I had it running 10.4.11. Leopard is very nice, but it's suffering far more instability than Tiger - simply because I keep running out of RAM.
    Under Tiger, a general rule of thumb was that just after startup, and without any open applications (except activity monitor), there would br ~60 MB of "Wired" RAM, and about 100 MB of "Active" RAM. These values are those given by Activity monitor. The "kernel_task" process rarely took up more than ~80 MB, even with a dozen applications running.
    Under Leopard, just after startup and with only activity monitor open, I have roughly 150 MB "wired" and roughly 350 MB "active". "kernel_task" usually eats 100-150 MB, even without any running apps. I never have more than about 600 MB free - and usually run between 100-200 MB free with only iTunes and Safari open. While running backups (with .Mac Backup 3.1.2), I've had OS X report more than 3 MILLION page outs! That's a 4 GB swap file! This is proving to be a tremendous slowdown, negating all of Leopard's speed increases. In addition, many applications crash as they run out of RAM - I'll have an application crash every few hours or so under Leopard, while I'd go weeks without a crash under Tiger. Unlike in Tiger, this isn't isolated to ram-hungry applications either - just about anything and everything has crashed when RAM is tight.
    Is there anything that I can do that will reduce the amount of RAM used by the system? Are there applications/processes/plugins/etc that OS X loads that are not required, that I can stop? I'd really rather not downgrade to Tiger, but it may prove necessary.
    I'd like to drop a 1 GB RAM card into the PB - to get 1.5 GB of total RAM, but I don't have the ~$120 or so to spend on a RAM card in the near future. Anything I can do to reduce RAM usage and speed up the Powerbook would be very helpful.
    Thanks,
    -Dan

    I wonder where you get your RAM prices. I found this at Datamem.com - 1 GB DIMM for $69 w/lifetime warranty.
    Face it if you plan to use Leopard your memory needs will at least double. That's partly why Apple specifies 512 MBs as the minimum for Leopard versus the 256 MB minimum for Tiger.
    If you're suffering from instability then it's possible you haven't sufficient free space on your hard drive. You should plan to leave not less than 15 percent of the drive's capacity free at all times. Add 8 GBs to that if you regularly burn DVDs.
    Be sure your system isn't corrupt. Repair the hard drive and permissions. Use third-party utilities to clear the system, user, and font caches. Be sure the Unix maintenance scripts are being run on schedule.
    Kappy's Personal Suggestions for OS X Maintenance
    For disk repairs use Disk Utility. For situations DU cannot handle the best third-party utilities are: Disk Warrior; DW only fixes problems with the disk directory, but most disk problems are caused by directory corruption; Disk Warrior 4.0 is now Intel Mac compatible. TechTool Pro provides additional repair options including file repair and recovery, system diagnostics, and disk defragmentation. TechTool Pro 4.5.2 is Intel Mac compatible; Drive Genius is similar to TechTool Pro in terms of the various repair services provided. The current version, 1.5.1, is Intel Mac compatible.
    OS X performs certain maintenance functions that are scheduled to occur on a daily, weekly, or monthly period. The maintenance scripts run in the early AM only if the computer is turned on 24/7 (no sleep.) If this isn't the case, then an excellent solution is to download and install a shareware utility such as Macaroni, JAW PseudoAnacron, or Anacron that will automate the maintenance activity regardless of whether the computer is turned off or asleep.
    OS X automatically defrags files less than 20 MBs in size, so unless you have a disk full of very large files there's little need for defragmenting the hard drive. As for virus protection there are few if any such animals affecting OS X. You can protect the computer easily using the freeware Open Source virus protection software ClamXAV. Personally I would avoid most commercial anti-virus software because of their potential for causing problems.
    I would also recommend downloading the shareware utility TinkerTool System that you can use for periodic maintenance such as removing old logfiles and archives, clearing caches, etc.
    For emergency repairs install the freeware utility Applejack. If you cannot start up in OS X, you may be able to start in single-user mode from which you can run Applejack to do a whole set of repair and maintenance routines from the commandline.
    When you install any new system software or updates be sure to repair the hard drive and permissions beforehand. I also recommend booting into safe mode before doing system software updates.
    Get an external Firewire drive at least equal in size to the internal hard drive and make (and maintain) a bootable clone/backup. You can make a bootable clone using the Restore option of Disk Utility. You can also make and maintain clones with good backup software. My personal recommendations are (order is not significant):
    1. Retrospect Desktop (Commercial - not yet universal binary)
    2. Synchronize! Pro X (Commercial)
    3. Synk (Backup, Standard, or Pro)
    4. Deja Vu (Shareware)
    5. PsynchX 2.1.1 and RsyncX 2.1 (Freeware)
    6. Carbon Copy Cloner (Freeware - 3.0 is a Universal Binary)
    7. SuperDuper! (Commercial)
    The following utilities can also be used for backup, but cannot create bootable clones:
    1. Backup (requires a .Mac account with Apple both to get the software and to use it.)
    2. Toast
    3. Impression
    4. arRSync
    Apple's Backup is a full backup tool capable of also backing up across multiple media such as CD/DVD. However, it cannot create bootable backups. It is primarily an "archiving" utility as are the other two.
    Impression and Toast are disk image based backups, only. Particularly useful if you need to backup to CD/DVD across multiple media.
    Visit The XLab FAQs and read the FAQs on maintenance, optimization, virus protection, and backup and restore.
    Additional suggestions will be found in Mac Maintenance Quick Assist.
    Referenced software can be found at www.versiontracker.com and www.macupdate.com.

  • Easiest speedup--more RAM, or faster HD?

    I recently got a stock 2GHz C2D Macbook--80 GB 5400 RPM HD and 1 GB memory. If you could only upgrade one, which would see a better speed boost: up the memory (to 1.5 GB using unmatched RAM), or install a 7200 RPM HD (remain at 80 GB)?
    95% of the time, the speed is great, but after awhile switching between apps (especially heftier apps, like iPhoto and iTunes and very especially bringing these apps up via FrontRow), causes very noticeable delays. The login screen to get out of screensaver then takes awhile to come up as well.
    Not too surprised to see pageouts (via MenuMeters) numbering in the hundreds of thousands, but my old dual-533 MHz PowerMac G4, with only 768 MB of RAM, didn't seem to choke as bad between iPhoto, etc. I don't regularly run PPC apps on my MB, though I do expect a speed/response penalty after starting one up.
    So is my amount of RAM "okay" if I just up the speed of the HD?
    One other difference: I always shut down my G4 when done so it starts fresh next time; my MB I just sleep/wake, so RAM isn't allowed to clear and virtual memory isn't flushed.
    Comments and experience welcome, thanks!
    Macbook 2 GHz C2D   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   1 GB RAM

    If you are getting lots of pageouts, the correct solution is more RAM, or running fewer RAM-hungry programs at the same time.
    Your ratio of pageouts to pageins should be less than 10%. If it is greater than that, you are working the virtual memory system too hard.
    You probably should have 2 Gig RAM, but going to unmatched 1.5 will be a start. Eventually match up another 1 Gig DIMM.
    When you run Acitivity Monitor, look to see what PPC stuff is running. If you can replace all the legacy PPC stuff with Intel or Universal apps, your memory will go farther, because you won't have the additional overhead of the Rosetta emulation layer running.
    Widgets are often RAM hungry, too. Watch out there.
    Since you are currently working your Virtual Memory system too hard, I'd recommend rebooting more often, to clear stuff out. (Once Rosetta is started by running a PPC app, it will stay in memory until reboot.)
    Over-working the VM system will lead to premature Hard Disk failure, in addition to bad performance and lousy battery life.

  • Solution Manager systems RAM requirements - problems with the Java Engine

    Hello,
    I am about to install SAP Solution Manager 7 on a WIndows 2003 Server x64 but I need to know what the RAM requirements are? I have been having problems with the Java Engine starting and it seems to time out, I have heard that this is a very RAM hungry process and it might be why?
    Many thanks for your help in advance,
    Omar

    Hello Omar,
    To size SAP Solution Manager 7.0 EHP1 we recommend to use the SAP Solution Manager Quicksizer Tool at:
    http://service.sap.com/sizing-solman
    Here you find information on how to use the tool, how to collect input data for E2E Scenario Sizing, on SAP E2E RCA Sizing, Introscope Tuning, Wily Enterprise Manager Cluster Setup for E2E RCA Scenario and BI Aggregation Strategy in E2E Scenario.
    Please find more information about installing Solution Manager in:
    http://service.sap.com/instguides -> SAP Solution Manager
    I hope this information helps.
    Thanks,
    Mark

  • CS6 64bit isso slow it blinks in response to every new stroke, yet still utilizes less than 2GB RAM

    Illustrator CS6 64bit is so overloaded that each time I draw a new brush stroke it responds only after a second of delay, while the area of the document where I added the brush stroke will sort of change it`s content for this duration and show some older state of the document or other gibberish, until AI has finished `processing` the new brush stroke, and then it would blink back to normal and I would be able to continue working. Despite the delay, for some reason, AI 64bit chooses to utilize no more than 2 GB of RAM.
    I do have a huge number of vector shapes in the document. My document is 1000px x 1000px and it weighs around 40MB. My machine  is a core i7 2.8 ghz with 18GB RAM 1066 running windows 7 64bit. C drive is an SSD and for Cache I have another SSD with read/write speed around 500 Mb\second out of which 20GB is reserved for windows pagefile and the other 100GB is free . Same SSD is designated as scratch disk for AI, and the AI files which I`m editing are located on this very same SSD.
    When running photoshop 64bit it will use up the available 18GB RAM according to it`s need.
    I hoped that AI 64bit would use up my RAM, too, so as to allow it to respond quicker. Why doesn`t it do so?

    Ultimately the differences between system will appear with usage and will obviously be more noticeable (or not) with not only the applications but how they are utilised.
    For many "average" users the perfomance difference between the GMA950 and the ATi X1900 XT in the Mac Pro is not even noticed. If you are however into video editing or advanced photo editing/management then then you'll find benefits with the MBP. While you are using iLife today that may not always be the case. As time progresses even iLife may make more use of the performance of the GPU.
    As for RAM, again, it comes down to usage. Even with more RAM hungry applications 2GB can be just fine as long as you don't expect to be able to run multiples of these at once. For instance, 2GB is fine to run Parallels, 2GB is more than fine to run Photoshop… but don't be thinking that it's fine to be run these concurrently. Unless you're using applications that clearly require a bucket load of RAM then the practicalities of 2GB comes simply down to your workflow. There are some users that like to have every application they have constantly up and running which makes then need a lot more RAM than otherwise.
    Be aware that speed and long term value for money is not only dependent on the obvious hardware specs. Never underestimate the value of having a clean, simple and fast software setup along with a good fast drive with a low (sub-50%) usage.
    Looking forward though, you definitely will get a longer lifespan out of a MBP. How much longer will depend on many things outside of our control, one major one being you. Think carefully as to what you're wanting to do, how you want to do it and what is important to you. Your choice might become very obvious where your needs rule out one or the other.
    Generally speaking, buy as much computing power as you can afford. This advice though does not always result in the best value for money.

  • Games/RAM on MacBook Pro 15"

    I have recently purchased a MBP 15" with the base graphics and specs. When I go to play a game, sometimes it really lags, almost to the point of unplayability. The game I'm playing when this happens is Minecraft. I don't know if Minecraft is a RAM hog or if something else is the problem. Another thing is that after I quit the game and my MBP is cooling down it seems to run extremely slow. I don't know why this is happening; if someone could enlighten me, that would be great. One last question, even though I just bought my Mac, I think I already need more RAM. The computer will slow down for no reason, and when I took a look at my page outs it was up over a gig, and for swap I have 3.99 GB. Is there something wrong with my comptuer or do I just need more RAM? Any help is appreciated.

    Bimmer and I both have 16GB of RAM in our MBPs and I can tell you that my page outs and swap are always at 0 bytes. I just restarted and am only actually 'using' 7.56GB of my built-in 16GB but that number can grow to almost 14GB used (with still 0 bytes of page outs and swap) when I'm really cranking up the machine.
    Like Bimmer, I suggest that you install as much RAM as your computer will hold. Games are particularly RAM hungry and I really think that you would see a dramatic difference in performance if you upgrade.
    When did you buy your MBP? Which model do you have?
    Clinton

  • Upgrading my MBP to 16 gigs of RAM - 1.35 volt vs. 1.5 volt?

    Hey all,
    There does not seem to be a diffinitive answer to this question.  The picture below is of the existing ram in my Apple MacBook Pro 2.2GHz Intel Core i7 (15-inch DDR3) Early-2011.  When I look this RAM up to find out the voltage, it appears to be 1.5v but I have not been able to verfiy that from a reliable source.  Any ideas?  Will it be labeled somewhere on the chip?
    Crucial suggests a 1.35v chip
    http://www.crucial.com/store/mpartspecs.aspx?mtbpoid=0EA3E8DAA5CA7304
    OWC suggests a 1.5v chip
    http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/1333DDR3S16P/
    A suggestion was made to me by apple (who could not confirm the voltage of the factory installed RAM) to match the voltage of the existing RAM.
    Long story short...how can I verfiy the voltage of the chip below, and, does anyone have any other guidance on why I should use 1.35v (less power, extends the battery life?) or the 1.5v?

    Yes any App that is RAM hungry will benefit from having more RAM, up to a point. Once you have enough installed that the normal apps you run do not use all of it then the extra is just left doing nothing. If those memory hungry apps aren't running all the memory is just sitting there doing nothing.
    More RAM is much better then not enough RAM. But as I stated above "Adding more RAM will not make your system run any faster". It will just be able to run at its normal speed when you have a lot of Apps open at once or are using RAM hungry apps.
    cjwohlre wrote:
    Shootist007
    I do a decent amount of video editing on imovie, and only had 4mb of RAM installed.  I was told imovie would run much faster with the extra RAM installed?  not the case?

  • Minimum ram and hdd space need for windows 7

    What is the minimum of ram and hdd space memory to use with windows 7. Is the windows 7 faster than vista on the same machine ? thansk
    Nothing is impossible

    BillWindows said: (...) I bought 4g ddr2 for (...) I think most people should be able to afford an upgrade.
    Sorry, but I disagree fundamentally here. While it is true that RAM prices have come down since XP was released, there are many machines out there for which you can't just buy regular RAM around the corner. Either because the systems were designed so that only a certain amount of RAM can be used (e.g., 128 MB on one of my VAIOs) or because they use a special socket or because you are not allowed to open the case or for whatever other reason you can think of.
    I am not necessarily complaining. But I frequently hear that Microsoft wants to sell Windows 7 upgrades to XP owners. So if Microsoft wants to upgrade XP owners to Windows 7, they should better make sure that technical requirements are less or equal to those of XP.
    And no, it's not given by nature that newer OSes always need to become fatter, slower, and more RAM hungry: have a look at Mac OS X which actually improved performance over the past releases, even on older machines. 
    Also, before you flame me, I'm not just caring about "museum age" computers. I bought a netbook just months ago and it came with 1 GB of RAM. Warranty is void if I open the case. So I can't "just" upgrade to more than 1 GB RAM.

  • Mac Pro 3rd party Ram

    I recently got a new mac Pro 8-core.
    It came with 4gigs of RAM from Apple. I wanted to add more to this, since I do some very RAM-intensive audio work, running multiple programs at once.
    The installed RAM is 4 1Gig chips. Looking at the chips the manufacturer seems to be "hynix".
    Can anyone advise on how best to upgrade this machine to say 8gigs - whether I should go with another 4 1Gig chips, or 2 2Gig chips (which will allow for future expansion)?
    I heard that it can slow the computer slightly if you mix up ram chip sizes etc.
    Any RAM advice would be most welcomed!
    cheers

    I also ordered my MP with four gigs of RAM (4X1G). I added another 4X1G from Techworks, filling all of the slots with 1G sticks. True, it does not allow for adding more RAM without pulling some sticks but at this point, I can't see any need for more RAM unless one was running HUGE RAM hungry processes. I run a lot of pretty "heavy" apps (PhotoShop, Fireworks, Illustrator, InDesign, etc.) simultanesouly and most of the time with a large number of documents open in each and I have yet to see a beach ball (except when using Safari which, for some reason, seems to hang a lot).

  • T440p RAM 1.35 voltage

    Hello, I'm using Tinkpad T440p 20AN - 003AKR.
    I'm developing a program running on linux. and running two virtual machines, installed cent-os on Windows Hyper-V.
    I wanna add a 8GB memory on my thinkpad, and have searched internet shop, and I found memories that have different voltage.
    There are two different memory types like below:
    1. DDR3 8G PC3-12800 1.5 voltage
    2. DDR3 8G PC3-12800 1.35 voltage
    Can I use a memory number 2 (voltage 1.35)?
    I think they are same, except low-voltage or not. and I expect long battery life if I use 1.35 voltage memory.
    Plz, let me know it is OK or not.

    Yes any App that is RAM hungry will benefit from having more RAM, up to a point. Once you have enough installed that the normal apps you run do not use all of it then the extra is just left doing nothing. If those memory hungry apps aren't running all the memory is just sitting there doing nothing.
    More RAM is much better then not enough RAM. But as I stated above "Adding more RAM will not make your system run any faster". It will just be able to run at its normal speed when you have a lot of Apps open at once or are using RAM hungry apps.
    cjwohlre wrote:
    Shootist007
    I do a decent amount of video editing on imovie, and only had 4mb of RAM installed.  I was told imovie would run much faster with the extra RAM installed?  not the case?

  • RAM upgrade on my Macbook Pro

    I have the following:
    Macbook Pro 15" version 8.2 (early 2011)
    Currently running 2 x 2Gb 1333MHz DDR3 RAM
    2.2 GHz Intel Core i7
    OSX 10.9.1
    I edit photos on this laptop, and my software is very RAM hungry. It's slowing my Mac down very much. I want to upgrade the RAM, but am not sure how much I can increase by. I wanted to ideally increase the RAM to 2 x 8Gb cards. Could someone please tell me what the maximum amount is that i can increase my RAM?
    Thank you in advance.

    You can upgrade to 16GB of RAM.
    Around here, we tend to recommend Crucial or OWC RAM. It's guaranteed to work with Macs whereas some other RAM doesn't meet the stringent specifications for Mac RAM.
    Visit the Crucial website and click on the System Scanner tab. You can download a small app which you can unzip and run. It will report your system specs back to Crucial and you'll be presented with the upgrades available for your machine.
    Good luck,
    Clinton

  • Anyone recommend best iTunes release for user with no iPhone/iPod touch?

    After finally resolving some iPod restore issues - I am going to clean up my Windows install with a fresh install this weekend.
    Just wonder what folks think about always using the latest iTunes if one does not have an iPhone/iTouch etc. As I gathered as much info as I could on the iTunes releases within the last year or so - it seems each release tends to add more overhead. Like more services suddenly appearing like the "mobile device" service being installed on top of the already RAM hungry core components.
    When I first got this iPod for Xmas last year - and installed iTunes for the first time - the thing that struck me the most was watching iTunes guzzle 65MB of RAM just sitting there doing nothing (not even playing a track). After that eye-opener (and no change for the better over the last release which seem to use somewhere around 90MB in my last tests) - I simply reverted back to Winamp 5.35 as my actual player. It uses 4.5MB when minimized to the System Tray and I simply set it to scan the My Music folder - giving me the entire library with almost no overhead - I mean c'mon...90MB to just listen to some music?
    So - if you are in this situation - 5.5g 80GB iPod with no iPhone, no iPod Touch and use iTunes simply to load/manage the iPod - what iTunes release (within the last year) would you recommend for the best balance of features/performance and least amount of background drain? I have read some have stuck with 7.2.3.6...good? Bad?
    Another Q - if I was to go current - can one install the 7.5 package and then uninstall or disable that Mobile Service(or not even install it all at) when installing iTunes?
    Appreciate any comments!
    Cheers!
    VP

    I don't recall there being any choices when it came to installing iTunes. I guess if there is an issue about the resources that iTunes is using, I would only start iTunes when I want to manage the music on the iPod. Otherwise, not start and/or minimize it, especially since you are using another software product to play music. I haven't started iTunes on my laptop today, and the iTunes helper is only using 1.9MB of memory right now. I'm using the latest version. I'll start up iTunes and give you a reply on how much it is using.
    I just started iTunes and it is only using 31MB of RAM.
    Message was edited by: ChrisJ4203
    Added start up RAM usage

Maybe you are looking for