Rating filter moves images on light table into a single pile

Anyone seen this?
I have a bunch of images arranged on the light table with various star ratings. The images are arranged by number of stars into various grouping - all the 5's together etc.
When I use the filter in the browser to see only the 5's for example, the light table will show only the 5's as epxected.
When I then select unrated or better, all the rest of the images end up in a single pile on the light table.
If I filter on 3 or better, and then switch back, just the 2s and 1s end up in the pile, ie whatever is not displayed by the filter gets piled up.
Is this a bug or "feature"? If it's a feature it's very annoying, unless there is some way to "lock" the position of an image on the LT.

OK, so figured out a convoluted bodge-around:
1. Make an album of all your selects. Select all and make a new Light Table(LT) from all.
2. With LT selected, click the lock icon.
3. With LT still selected, hold down apple key, and select your album of selects (step 1). This opens this album in a separate tab, but because lock icon on LT is selected, the LT viewer area is still visible.
4. in you album of selects, type your chosen keyword search. From the resulting set, select and drag the image(s) to the LT viewer. Do this with as many keyword searches as required. When done you can optionally close the selects album tabbed browser.
5. Use LT as you normally would. You can now toggle on/off images by keyword by typing it in search field.
Any other methods I've tried crashes Aperture.
Comments anyone?

Similar Messages

Move data from multiple Tables to a Single Table & Convert the list to ALV.

Hi,
My aim is to get the list of Materials with their descriptions, with MRP Controller, with Unrestriced Qty. & the Reorder Qty. So, I have to fetch the data from different tables. But finally I am not able to copy or move the fetched data from multiple tables into the single final table.
Also tell me how to convert this list into ALV.
Below is the program code.
*& Report Y_REORDER_REPORT
REPORT Y_REORDER_REPORT.
tables : marc,makt, mard.
DATA: Begin of i_final occurs 0,
        matnr type marc-matnr,
        maktx type makt-maktx,
        DISPO type marc-DISPO,
        MINBE type marc-MINBE,
        LABST type mard-LABST,
      end of i_final.
DATA: Begin of i_marc occurs 0,
       matnr type marc-matnr,
       DISPO type marc-DISPO,
       MINBE type marc-MINBE,
      end of i_marc.
DATA: Begin of i_makt occurs 0,
       matnr type makt-matnr,
       maktx type makt-maktx,
      end of i_makt.
DATA: Begin of i_mard occurs 0,
       matnr type mard-matnr,
       LABST type mard-LABST,
       LGORT TYPE MARD-LGORT,
      end of i_mard.
SELECT matnr
        dispo
        minbe from marc
        into corresponding fields of table i_marc
        where dispo EQ 'STR'.
SORT I_MARC by MATNR.
WRITE: /10 'Material',
        75 'MRP',
        80 'Reorder Qty.'.
LOOP at i_marc.
Write: /10 i_marc-matnr,
        75 i_marc-dispo,
        80 i_marc-minbe.
ENDLOOP.
write: /.
SELECT matnr
        MAKTX from makt
        into corresponding fields of table i_makt
        for all entries in i_marc
        where matnr = i_marc-matnr.
LOOP at i_makt.
Write: /10 i_makt-matnr,
        30 i_makt-maktx.
ENDLOOP.
SELECT matnr
        LGORT
        LABST from mard
        into corresponding fields of table i_mard
        for all entries in i_marc
        where matnr = i_marc-matnr.
LOOP at i_mard.
Write: /10 i_mard-matnr,
        30 I_MARD-LGORT,
        40 i_mard-labst.
ENDLOOP.
move i_mard-matnr to i_final-matnr.
move i_marc-dispo to i_final-dispo.
move i_marc-minbe to i_final-minbe.
move i_makt-maktx to i_final-maktx.
move i_mard-labst to i_final-labst.
WRITE: /10 'Material',
        30 'Material Desc.',
        75 'MRP',
        80 'Reorder Qty.',
        105 'Current Stock'.
LOOP at i_final.
Write: /10 i_final-matnr,
        30 i_final-maktx,
        75 i_final-dispo,
        80 i_final-minbe,
        105 i_final-labst.
ENDLOOP.
*LOOP at i_mard.
*Write: /10 i_mard-matnr,
       30 i_makt-maktx,
       75 i_marc-dispo,
       80 i_marc-minbe,
       105 i_mard-labst.
*ENDLOOP.
Regards,
Vishal

Change like this,
SELECT matnr
lgort
labst FROM mard
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_mard
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_marc
WHERE matnr = i_marc-matnr.
LOOP AT i_mard.
   WRITE: /10 i_mard-matnr,
   30 i_mard-lgort,
   40 i_mard-labst.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT i_marc.
   READ TABLE i_mard WITH KEY matnr = i_marc-matnr.
   READ TABLE i_makt WITH KEY matnr = i_marc-matnr.
   MOVE i_mard-matnr TO i_final-matnr.
   MOVE i_marc-dispo TO i_final-dispo.
   MOVE i_marc-minbe TO i_final-minbe.
   MOVE i_makt-maktx TO i_final-maktx.
   MOVE i_mard-labst TO i_final-labst.
   APPEND i_final.
ENDLOOP.
WRITE: /10 'Material',
30 'Material Desc.',
75 'MRP',
80 'Reorder Qty.',
105 'Current Stock'.

Numbers: Copy/Paste from multiple tables into 1 single Table?

I would appreciate some guidance in creating a copy/paste script from multiple numbers tables into a different single table within the same numbers document.
The columns in the source table are in different positions to the destination table.
So for example, i would want to copy…
Sheet 1, Table 1 Cell A3 copy to Sheet 2 Table Z Cell B2
Sheet 1, Table 1 Cell B3 copy to Sheet 2 Table Z Cell C2
Sheet 1, Table 1 Cell C3 copy to Sheet 2 Table Z Cell E2
Sheet 1, Table 1 Cell D3 copy to Sheet 2 Table Z Cell F2
Sheet 1, Table 1 Cell E3 copy to Sheet 2 Table Z Cell G2
Sheet 1, Table 1 Cell G3 copy to Sheet 2 Table Z Cell I2
Sheet 1, Table 1 Cell J3 copy to Sheet 2 Table Z Cell H2
and repeat the copy/paste on subsequent rows of each table until there is an empty row in Sheet 1 Table 1 (or if this is difficult, say set the repeat to a max of 30 rows).
The script would then need to move on to Sheet 1 Table 2, and do the same copying to Sheet 2 Table Z (from where the previous copy/paste finished in Table Z).
Repeat process would finalise with Sheet 1 Table 6.
The Paste part would need to be pasting values, as the cells in the source tables do contain some formulas.
At the moment this is all done manually and does take some to to undertake.
If anyone can help, i would be very grateful.
Thanks,
Colin

Interceptor,
are you trying to aggregate data from severl tables into a single table? If so you whould be able to do this without a script. The function indirect() will allow you to construct the proper formula, which you may fill over (in the same row) to the appropriate cells, then fill down.
Here is a small example:
There are three data tables ("Table 1", "Table 2", and "Table 3"). And a summary "Table Z"
In table Z make the first row a header (as shown):
Use column A to enter the Sheet name and colomn B to enter the table name.
In row 1 (the header), enter the cells you want to get
in cell C2 type (or copy and paste from here) the formula:
=INDIRECT($A2&"::"&$B2&"::"&C$1)
now select cell C2, copy now select cell C2 thru H2, paste
now select the cells C2 thu H2, hover the corsor over the bottom edge of the selection, and drag the yellow cirlc down as needed to fill the formula down.
Update the sheet and table names as needed for each row

Export Multiple tables into a single Excel Sheet

We have a use case where we need to export multiple tables into an excel sheet. The exportCollectionActionListener only allows one table (which is provided in the exportedId attribute) to be exported into Excel. So is there a method provided by adf to export more that one table into excel ?

dvohra,
I need to export multiple tables into a single excel sheet. These links only show how to export a single table to an excel sheet.
I have tried out this : http://iadvise.blogspot.com/2007/04/export-adf-table-to-excel.html. But i am not getting the popup to save the file. So i can't find out where the file got created.

I can not move "Image Tricks Light" app to trash. How do I delete it.

I need to delete the app Image Tricks Light, because a window keeps popping up (when I try to open certain other files)
saying the file is damaged and I need to delete it and reinstall it, but it will not move to my trash. What can I do?

Check to see if the app has it's own uninstall utility, you will need to check with the developer. If it does not then try AppCleaner and see if that helps.

Combine 2 Queries (from SAME table) into a SINGLE query

I have this two queries (from SAME table), and want to combine into one SINGLE query, how?
How can we use CASE WHEN THEN for such situation?
Query1:
SELECT t_inner.*,
Floor(t_inner.ProductiveTime/ 3600) || 'hr:' || LPAD(Floor(Mod(t_inner.ProductiveTime,3600) / 60),2,0) || 'min:' AS Productive_Time,
Floor(t_inner.OperatorDownTime/ 3600) || 'hr:' || LPAD(Floor(Mod(t_inner.OperatorDownTime,3600) / 60),2,0) || 'min:' AS OperatorDown_Time
FROM
(SELECT SYSTEMTYPE,
sum(TIME_TEST + TIME_STEP) AS ProductiveTime,
sum(TIME_IDLE) AS OperatorDownTime
FROM PFODS.PPL_TESTSYSTEMS_UTILISATION
WHERE (SYSTEMTYPE = '0005-072')
AND (TS_START >= to_date('13/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY'))
AND TS_End <= to_date('17/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY') + 1 + (1/1440) +(59/86400)
AND MONO != '9999999999'
GROUP BY SYSTEMTYPE ) t_inner
Query 2:
SELECT t_inner.*,
Floor(t_inner.MachineDownTime/ 3600) || 'hr ' || LPAD(Floor(Mod(t_inner.MachineDownTime,3600) / 60),2,0) || 'min' AS MachineDown_Time
FROM
(SELECT SYSTEMTYPE,
sum(TIME_IDLE) AS MachineDownTime
FROM PFODS.PPL_TESTSYSTEMS_UTILISATION
WHERE (SYSTEMTYPE = '0005-072')
AND (TS_START >= to_date('13/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY'))
AND TS_End <= to_date('17/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY') + 1 + (1/1440) +(59/86400)
AND MONO = '9999999999'
GROUP BY SYSTEMTYPE) t_inner
see http://postimg.org/image/koq87iyyz/ and
http://postimg.org/image/fv3zxa38n

with the first query,
SELECT t_inner.*,
Floor(t_inner.ProductiveTime/ 3600) || 'hr:' || LPAD(Floor(Mod(t_inner.ProductiveTime,3600) / 60),2,0) || 'min' AS Productive_Time
FROM
(SELECT SYSTEMTYPE,
--sum(TIME_TEST) AS TIME_TEST,
--sum(TIME_SYSTEM) AS TIME_SYSTEM,
--sum(TIME_STEP) AS TIME_STEP,
--sum(TIME_IDLE) AS TIME_IDLE,
sum(TIME_TEST + TIME_STEP) AS ProductiveTime
FROM PFODS.PPL_TESTSYSTEMS_UTILISATION
WHERE (SYSTEMTYPE = '0005-072')
AND (TS_START >= to_date('13/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY'))
AND TS_End <= to_date('17/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY') + 1 + (1/1440) +(59/86400)
AND MONO != '9999999999'
GROUP BY SYSTEMTYPE) t_inner
it gives output as from
http://postimg.org/image/koq87iyyz/
with the second query,
SELECT t_inner.*,
Floor(t_inner.MachineDownTime/ 3600) || 'hr ' || LPAD(Floor(Mod(t_inner.MachineDownTime,3600) / 60),2,0) || 'min' AS MachineDown_Time
FROM
(SELECT SYSTEMTYPE,
sum(TIME_IDLE) AS MachineDownTime
FROM PFODS.PPL_TESTSYSTEMS_UTILISATION
WHERE (SYSTEMTYPE = '0005-072')
AND (TS_START >= to_date('13/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY'))
AND TS_End <= to_date('17/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY') + 1 + (1/1440) +(59/86400)
AND MONO = '9999999999'
GROUP BY SYSTEMTYPE) t_inner
it gives output as from
http://postimg.org/image/fv3zxa38n/
I want to come those 2 queries into a single query, such that it gives both outputs as above. Let me know if you need any other information. thanks.

Extract Multiple Rows from a Single Table into a Single Row in a New Table

I have a table in a database that contains contact data like name, address, phone number, etc.
The folks who designed the database and wrote the application wrote it so that all contact records are placed in that table, regardless of contact type. In fact, the contacts table does not even have a column for "type" even though there are many
different types of contacts present in that table.
I am trying to write a mail merge style report in SRSS, that gets sent to a specific type of contact, based on criteria provided that must be obtained from another table, and that data is then used to get back to a specific set of contacts from the contacts
table.
The attached file directly below describes my problem and all related information in an extremely detailed way.
SRSSMailMergeIssue.pdf
Unless there is a way to make a SRSS Tablix point to two different data sets in SRSS, it looks like I have to combine multiple rows from the same table into a new table.
If anyone can review the details in the attached pdf file and possibly point me in the direction I need to run to solve this probelm, I would greatly appreciate it.
I also included a document (below) that shows the tables I reference in the probelm description.
dbtables.pdf

I found a solution.... and posted it below
select
dk.ucm_docketnumber [UCM DocketNumber],
dk.ucm_docketid [UCM DocketID],
vc.FirstName [Victim FirstName],
vc.MiddleName [Victim MiddleName],
vc.LastName [Victim LastName],
vc.Suffix [Victim Suffix],
vc.Address1_Line1 [Victim AddressLine1],
vc.Address1_Line2 [Victim AddressLine2],
vc.Address1_Line3 [Victim AddressLine3],
vc.Address1_City [Victim City],
vc.Address1_StateOrProvince [Victim StateProvince],
vc.Address1_PostalCode [Victim Postalcode],
oc.FirstName [Offender FirstName],
oc.MiddleName [Offender MiddleName],
oc.LastName [Offender LastName],
oc.Suffix [Offender Suffix],
oc.Address1_Line1 [Offender AddressLine1],
oc.Address1_Line2 [Offender AddressLine2],
oc.Address1_Line3 [Offender AddressLine3],
oc.Address1_City [Offender City],
oc.Address1_StateOrProvince [Offender StateProvince],
oc.Address1_PostalCode [Offender Postalcode],
pc.FirstName [Arresting Officer FirstName],
pc.MiddleName [Arresting Officer MiddleName],
pc.LastName [Arresting Officer LastName],
pc.Address1_Line1 [Arresting Officer AddressLine1],
pc.Address1_Line2 [Arresting Officer AddressLine2],
pc.Address1_Line3 [Arresting Officer AddressLine3],
pc.Address1_City [Arresting Officer City],
pc.Address1_StateOrProvince [Arresting Officer StateProvince],
pc.Address1_PostalCode [Arresting Officer Postalcode]
FROM ucm_docket dk
left outer join ucm_victim v on dk.ucm_docketid = v.ucm_docketnumber
left outer join contact vc on vc.contactid = v.ucm_victimlookup
left outer join ucm_offender o on o.ucm_offenderid = dk.ucm_offenderlookup
left outer join contact oc on oc.contactid = o.ucm_individualid
left outer join contact pc on pc.contactid = dk.ucm_ArrestingOfficerLookup
WHERE (dk.ucm_docketnumber = @DocketNUM)

Combine 2 internal tables into a single internal table

Hi
I need to replace the following join statement by splitting it into 2 select statements and then combine them into a single internal table
SELECT vbak~waerk
vbapvbeln vbapposnr vbapnetwr vbapbrgew
vbap~erdat                         "IM152805
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE l_t_orders
FROM vbak INNER JOIN vbap ON vbakvbeln = vbapvbeln
FOR ALL entries IN t_mchb
WHERE vbap~vbeln = t_mchb-vbeln
AND vbap~posnr = t_mchb-posnr.
Need to replace the above with separate select statements and then combine the result into a single internal table...
could anyone please help me...
thanks in advance

Hi,
Check the code below,
select vbeln waerk
from vbak into table it_vbak for all entries in t_mchb where vbeln = t_mchb-vbeln.
select posnr
     netwr
     brgew
     erdat "IM152805
INTO TABLE it_vbap
for all entries in t_mchb
where vbeln = t_mchb-vbeln
and posnr = t_mchb-posnr.
loop at it_vbap into wa_vbap.
read table it_vbak into wa_vbak where vbeln = wa_vbap-vbeln.
if sy-subrc = 0.
l_t_orders-waerk = wa_vbak-waerk.
l_t_orders-vbeln = wa_vbap-vbeln.
l_t_orders-posnr = wa_vbap-posnr
l_t_orders-netwr   = wa_vbap-netwr.
l_t_orders-brgew   = wa_vbap-brgew.
l_t_orders-erdat   = wa_vbap-erdat.
append l_t_orders.
endif.
endloop.
Reward if it is helpful.
Regards,
Bhanu

Need help with query joining several tables into a single return line

what i have:
tableA:
puid, task
id0, task0
id1, task1
id2, task2
tableB:
puid, seq, state
id0, 0, foo
id0, 1, bar
id0, 2, me
id1, 0, foo
id2, 0, foo
id2, 1, bar
tableC:
puid, seq, date
id0, 0, 12/21
id0, 1, 12/22
id0, 2, 12/22
id1, 0, 12/23
id2, 0, 12/22
id2, 1, 12/23
what i'd like to return:
id0, task0, 12/21, 12/22, 12/22
id1, task1, 12/23, N/A, N/A
id2, task2, 12/22, 12/23, N/A
N/A doesn't mean return the string "N/A"... it just means there was no value, so we don't need anything in this column (null?)
i can get output like below through several joins, however i was hoping to condense each "id" into a single line...
id0, task0, 12/21
id0, task0, 12/22
id0, task0, 12/23
id1, task1, 12/23
is this possible fairly easily?
Edited by: user9979830 on Mar 29, 2011 10:53 AM
Edited by: user9979830 on Mar 29, 2011 10:58 AM

Hi,
Welcome to the forum!
user9979830 wrote:
what i have:...Thanks for posting that so clearly!
Whenever you have a question, it's even better if you post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for your sample data, like this:
CREATE TABLE     tablea
(       puid     VARCHAR2 (5)
,     task     VARCHAR2 (5)
INSERT INTO tablea (puid, task) VALUES ('id0', 'task0');
INSERT INTO tablea (puid, task) VALUES ('id1', 'task1');
INSERT INTO tablea (puid, task) VALUES ('id2', 'task2');
CREATE TABLE     tablec
(       puid     VARCHAR2 (5)
,     seq     NUMBER (3)
,     dt     DATE          -- DATE is not a good column name
INSERT INTO tablec (puid, seq, dt) VALUES ('id0', 0, DATE '2010-12-21');
INSERT INTO tablec (puid, seq, dt) VALUES ('id0', 1, DATE '2010-12-22');
INSERT INTO tablec (puid, seq, dt) VALUES ('id0', 2, DATE '2010-12-22');
INSERT INTO tablec (puid, seq, dt) VALUES ('id1', 0, DATE '2010-12-23');
INSERT INTO tablec (puid, seq, dt) VALUES ('id2', 0, DATE '2010-12-22');
INSERT INTO tablec (puid, seq, dt) VALUES ('id2', 1, DATE '2010-12-23');This way, people can re-create the problem and test their ideas.
It doesn't look like tableb plays any role in this problem, so I didn't post it.
Explain how you get the results from that data. For example, why do you want this row in the results:
PUID TASK DT1        DT2        DT3
id0   task0 12/21/2010 12/22/2010 12/22/2010rather than, say
PUID TASK DT1        DT2        DT3
id0   task0 12/22/2010 12/21/2010 12/22/2010? Does 12/21 have to go in the first column because it is the earliest date, or is it because 12/21 is related to the lowest seq value? Or do you even care about the order, just as long as all 3 dates are shown?
Always say what version of Oracle you're uisng. The query below will work in Oracle 9 (and up), but starting in Oracle 11, the SELECT ... PIVOT feature could help you.
i can get output like below through several joins, however i was hoping to condense each "id" into a single line... Condensing the output, so that there's only one line for each puid, sounds like a job for "GROUP BY puid":
WITH     got_r_num     AS
     SELECT     puid
     ,     dt
     ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY puid
                               ORDER BY         seq          -- and/or dt
                       )         AS r_num
     FROM    tablec
--     WHERE     ...     -- If you need any filtering, put it here
SELECT       a.puid
,       a.task
,       MIN (CASE WHEN r.r_num = 1 THEN r.dt END)     AS dt1
,       MIN (CASE WHEN r.r_num = 2 THEN r.dt END)     AS dt2
,       MIN (CASE WHEN r.r_num = 3 THEN r.dt END)     AS dt3
,       MIN (CASE WHEN r.r_num = 4 THEN r.dt END)     AS dt4
FROM       tablea    a
JOIN       got_r_num r ON   a.puid = r.puid
GROUP BY a.puid
,            a.task
ORDER BY a.puid
;I'm guessing that you want the dates arranged by seq; that is, for each puid, the date related to the lowest seq comes first, regardless of whther that date is the earliest date for that puid or not. If that's not what you need, then change the analytic ORDER BY clause.
This does not assume that the seq values are always consecutive integers (0, 1, 2, ...) for each puid. You can skip, or even duplicate values. However, if the values are always consecutive integers, starting from 0, then you could simplify this. You won't need a sub-query at all; just use seq instead of r_num in the main query.
Here's the output I got from the query above:
PUID TASK DT1        DT2        DT3        DT4
id0   task0 12/21/2010 12/22/2010 12/22/2010
id1   task1 12/23/2010
id2   task2 12/22/2010 12/23/2010As posted, the query will display the first 4 dts for each puid.
If there are fewer than 4 dts for a puid, the query will still work. It will leave some columns NULL at the end.
If there are more than 4 dts for a puid, the query will still work. It will display the first 4, and ignore the others.
There's nothing special about the number 4; you could make it 3, or 5, or 35, but whatever number you choose, you have to hard-code that many columns into the query, and always get that many columns of output.
For various ways to deal with a variable number of pivoted coolumns, see the following thread:
PL/SQL
This question actually doesn't have anything to do with SQL*Plus; it's strictly a SQL question, and SQL questions are best posted on the "SQL and PL/SQL" forum:
PL/SQL
If you're not sure whether a question is more of a SQL question or a SQL*Plus question, then post it on the SQL forum. Many more people pay attention to that forum than to this one.

Concatenating rows of a table into a single string

Hi,
My report gets an internal table LINES from READ_TEXT function module. This internal table LINES has 6 rows. My requirement is to concatenate all the 6 rows into a single field of string.
This is wht i have done.
data str type string.
loop at lines.
concatenate str lines into str separated by space.
clear lines.
endloop.
this code concatenates first three rows of the internal table LINES into STR, however the next rows are not concatenated into STR.
I have tried using
data : str(4096) type c.
but still it doesnt work.
Please advise.
Many Thanks,
Pritish.

dont worry, the values will never get truncated.
have a look at this code.
REPORT ZSTRINGSTRANGE line-size 1023 .
data : lines type TLINE occurs 0 with header line.
lines-tdformat = '*'.
lines-tdline = 'This is line 1, This is line 2, This is line 3'.
append lines.
lines-tdformat = '*'.
lines-tdline = 'This is line 1, This is line 2, This is line 3'.
append lines.
lines-tdformat = '*'.
lines-tdline = 'This is line 1, This is line 2, This is line 3'.
append lines.
lines-tdformat = '*'.
lines-tdline = 'This is line 1, This is line 2, This is line 3'.
append lines.
lines-tdformat = '*'.
lines-tdline = 'This is line 1, This is line 2, This is line 3'.
append lines.
lines-tdformat = '*'.
lines-tdline = 'This is line 1, This is line 2, This is line 3'.
append lines.
data str type string.
loop at lines.
concatenate str lines into str separated by space.
clear lines.
endloop.
write: / str.

Merge all ISO images of Oracle Linux into a single ISO (single installation media)

Hi all,
I have downloaded Oracle Linux 7 ISO files :
V74844-01.iso (4.1GB)
V74845-01.iso (340 MB)
V74846-01.iso (3.4GB)
V74847-01.iso (2.1GB)
Is it possible to merge all these ISO files into a single bootable ISO file, and write it to a 16GB USB stick to use it as installation media?

f53ff284-8915-4e99-9a17-9a463de00c22 wrote:
Other than V74844-01.iso, which of the remaining 3 ISO file are important for a fully functional installation?
None of them. Only V74844-01.iso is required for a fully functional installation.
V74845-01 is a boot ISO and is used by network administrators when creating network-based automated boot/install solutions that require the installer to run the UEK instead of the RHCK. The default ISO uses the RHCK.
V74846-01 and V74847-01 contain the source code for all the packages that ship on V74844-01. This is required under the terms of the Open Source licenses under which Oracle Linux is shipped. This is only required if you want to modify and recompile any of the packages provided by Oracle Linux.

Show image item from table into form's item.

Hi Friends,
My problem is:
I have 1 table with 2 cols:
eid number
e_pict blob.
I created a form (block based on this table). I'm able to show any valid image file stored in disk into e_pict (declared as image item) using the built_in READ_IMAGE_FILE. and also able to save it in the table test. But if I want to do the reverse process I mean retrieve the image from table's field to the image item of form, it creates problem. I even cannot compile the post_text_item trigger of eid:
select e_pict into :test.e_pict
from test
where rtrim(eid)=rtrim(:eid);
It is giving error:
bad bind variable 'test.e_pict'
Pls help me.
Regards,
Pragati.

If I declare the image field as long raw instead of blob then also the same problem.
I can save the image from file to database through a form but cannot retrieve an image from database to form.
Pls help.
Thanks in advance,
Pragati.

Moving the data from multiple internal tables into a single one

Hello everyone,
I am creating a classical report which uses the following tables.
tables : ekko, ekpo, mara, makt,lfa1.
my input parameter is
Select-options Purchase Order number
Following fields are getting used.
Doc no                  EKKO-EBELN
Material              EKPO-MATNR
Item number          EKPO-EBELP
Quantity             EKPO-MENGE
Material Group          MARA-MATKL
Vendor                  EKKO-LIFNR
Old Material code   MARA-BISMT
Material Desc.           MAKT-MAKTX
Vendor name         LFA1-NAME1
Now i need to do the following task.
1 Select record from EKKO Using document number.
2 Select record from EKPO using EKKO record using Document no as key.
3 Find out Old Material code of each and every material from Material master.
4 Find out Material description for each and every material from MAKT.
5 Sort record on Vendor, Purchase Order number and Material.
I have defined seperate internal tables for these operation.
Once i have fetched records into these individual internal tables from the corresponding DB tables i need to move these values into a new internal tables which has all the above fields mentioned
I need to move these values into a new internal table because to display the values on the report.
Any idea for the above ? Plz help with a sample example or some relevant.
Regards,
Ranjith Nambiar

Hi
1 Select record from EKKO Using document number.
2 Select record from EKPO using EKKO record using Document no as key.
Use inner join and retrive data into one internal table.for Ex ITAB1
3 Find out Old Material code of each and every material from Material master.
Use ITAB1 with for allentries in MARA table to get the onl materil number populate in to one table.
4 Find out Material description for each and every material from MAKT.
Get the Material desc with the same manner as above,
5 Sort record on Vendor, Purchase Order number and Material.
now sort the ITAB1 as you req.
now Loop on the ITAB1.
and read above 2 tables for old matnr and matner deac and append into another table as you want.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Hiren Patel

How to combine large number of key-value pair tables into a single table?

I have 250+ key-value pair tables with the following characteristics
1) keys are unique within a table but may or may not be unique across tables
2) each table has about 2 million rows
What is the best way to create a single table with all the unique key-values from all these tables? The following two queries work till about 150+ tables
with
t1 as ( select 1 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
          select 2 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'a2' as val from dual )
, t2 as ( select 2 as key, 'b1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'b2' as val from dual union all
          select 4 as key, 'b3' as val from dual )
, t3 as ( select 1 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
          select 5 as key, 'c2' as val from dual )
select coalesce(t1.key, t2.key, t3.key) as key
,      max(t1.val) as val1
,      max(t2.val) as val2
,      max(t3.val) as val3
from t1
full join t2 on ( t1.key = t2.key )
full join t3 on ( t2.key = t3.key )
group by coalesce(t1.key, t2.key, t3.key)
with
master as ( select rownum as key from dual connect by level <= 5 )
, t1 as ( select 1 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
          select 2 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'a2' as val from dual )
, t2 as ( select 2 as key, 'b1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'b2' as val from dual union all
          select 4 as key, 'b3' as val from dual )
, t3 as ( select 1 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
          select 5 as key, 'c2' as val from dual )
select m.key as key
,      t1.val as val1
,      t2.val as val2
,      t3.val as val3
from master m
left join t1 on ( t1.key = m.key )
left join t2 on ( t2.key = m.key )
left join t3 on ( t3.key = m.key )
/

A couple of questions, then a possible solution.
Why on earth do you have 250+ key-value pair tables?
Why on earth do you want to consolodate them into one table with one row per key?
You could do a pivot of all of the tables, without joining. something like:
with
t1 as ( select 1 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
          select 2 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'a2' as val from dual )
, t2 as ( select 2 as key, 'b1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'b2' as val from dual union all
          select 4 as key, 'b3' as val from dual )
, t3 as ( select 1 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
          select 5 as key, 'c2' as val from dual )
select key, max(t1val), max(t2val), max(t3val)
FROM (select key, val t1val, null t2val, null t3val
      from t1
      union all
      select key, null, val, null
      from t2
      union all
      select key, null, null, val
      from t3)
group by keyIf you can do this in a single query, unioning all 250+ tables, then you do not need to worry about chaining or migration. It might be necessary to do it in a couple of passes, depending on the resources available on your server. If so, I would be inclined to create the table first, with a larger than normal percent free, then do the first set as a straight insert, and the remaining pass or passes as a merge.
Another alternative might be to use the approach above, but limit the range of keys in each pass. So pass one would have a predicate like where key between 1 and 10 in each branch of the union, pass 2 would have key between 11 and 20 etc. That way everything would be straight inserts.
Having said all that, I go back to my second question above, why on earth do you want/need to do this? What is the business requirement you are trying to solve. There might be a much better way to meet the requirement.
John

Integration of one or more tables into a single database alias name

Hi Experts,
Hi Experts,
I got some problem while working with the crystal reports in VB.NET. How to combine one or more table fields
with in the single database alias name?
--roseline

Please provide more info.

Rating filter moves images on light table into a single pile

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for