RAW + JPG Stack

I'm new to all things Bridge.  I shoot RAW + JPG and have been using my camera manufacturer's proprietary application to manage files.  This application allows me to work with the RAW + JPG file pair as one file, all sorts, deletions, copies, pastes, etc effect both the RAW and the JPG file.  As I begin the learning curve in Bridge CS5, I'm wondering if there is a way to duplicate this feature in Bridge.  I've read a couple of threads about using a script (which is also very new and foreign to me) that will stack my RAW and JPG files together.  The two threads appear to be pre-Bridge CS5.  I'm wondering if the CS5 version of Bridge has a feature that will let me work with my RAW and JPG files together.  If not, what would a complete newbie have to do to utilize the script option discussed in some of the privious threads?
Thanks

Any of the scripts will work in CS5.
To install a script in Bridge:-
Edit - Preferences - Startup Scripts, click the "Reveal My Startup Scripts" button. this will open the folder where the script is to be placed.
A script is a plain text file with a .jsx extension
Extendscript Toolkit is the editor/IDE that is installed with Photoshop for scripts.
Once a script is placed into the folder close and restart Bridge so that is can pick up the new script.
Here is some code that should do the job....
#target bridge  
   if( BridgeTalk.appName == "bridge" ) { 
AutoStack = MenuElement.create("command", "Auto Stack", "at the beginning of submenu/Stack", "zx1");
AutoStack.onSelect = function () {
   stackEm();
function stackEm(){
app.document.sorts = [{ name:"name",type:"string", reverse:false}];
var jpgs = Folder(app.document.presentationPath).getFiles ("*.jpg");
app.document.deselectAll();
for(var a in jpgs){
var Name = decodeURI(jpgs[a].name).replace(/\.[^\.]+$/, '');
var stacks = Folder(app.document.presentationPath).getFiles(Name+".*");
if(stacks.length < 2) continue;
for(var z in stacks){ app.document.select(new Thumbnail(stacks[z]));}
StackFiles();
app.document.deselectAll();
function StackFiles(){
app.document.chooseMenuItem('submenu/Stack');
app.document.chooseMenuItem('StackGroup');

Similar Messages

  • PSE wish list - Auto stacking RAW + JPGs

    I'm using PSE V10 and have a 'wish list' item for suggested improvements to the program.
    A feature that would be extremely valuable to many users would be the ability to auto stack photos where there are the RAW + JPG images present in the Catalog. The JPG would end up on top of the stack.
    This can be done manually but is tedious when there are many photos to deal with. Failing an automatic feature a single action shortcut to access the 'Stack | Stack selected photos' command would be useful.
    a forum discussion on this topic is here: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4585792#4585792

    As reported above I THOUGHT I'd found a shortcut suitable for stacking a JPG over a RAW.
    However, the stack command in the main menu, which has the shortcut Ctrl+Alt+S will stack the RAW over the JPG whenever the RAW thumbnail is ahead of the JPG in the Catalog. I want the reverse to happen.
    I found I can get the JPG to stack over a RAW, if the RAW appears before the JPG, by selecting the RAW first then with the Ctrl button down select the JPG. Then using 'Stack | Stack selected photos' in the mouse right click menu. However, this fails when using Ctrl+Alt+S whenever the RAW is listed before the JPG. Am I missing something?

  • Script to automatically make a stack with a RAW+jpg pair of images

    While on my last trip, I accidently setup my camera to take Raw + small jpg. No big deal, that isn't too much memory, so I didn't really worry about it. When I got home, the jpg files were copied to my hard drive along with the raw files. So, I went to delete the jpgs and I realized something. Bridge runs very fast when it's drawing thumbnails and previews of small jpg images. I got to thinking. Wouldn't it be cool to make a script that would take your raw+jpg from the camera and convert each pair into a stack with the jpg on top. This would enable bridge to run much more quickly since it wouldn't need to render all those raw image thumbs and previews.
    Hmmm....now where to start....I looked around at the scripting language for photoshop. since I have written a little bit of javascript, I thought I would start there, but I can't find where the stack property is kept in metadata or the DOM.
    Any ideas of where I might turn from here?

    Version with some changes.<br />Try fix some bug.<br />Try increase speed.<br /><br />If you found some bug or make changes or fix, please post it to this forum.<br /><br />-== [start of script] ==--<br /><br />///////////////////<br />/// Name: Auto stacking files<br />/// Description: This script enable auto stacking files by name<br />/// Author: Tyzhnenko Dmitry<br />/// E-mail: [email protected]<br />/// Version: 0.32<br />///////////////////<br /><br />/*<br />@@@START_XML@@@<br /><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><br /><ScriptInfo xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en_US"><br />     <dc:title>Auto stacking files</dc:title><br />     <dc:description>This script enable auto stacing files by name function</dc:description><br /></ScriptInfo><br />@@@END_XML@@@<br />*/<br /><br />function AutomaticStackingFiles()<br />{<br />     /**<br />      The context in which this snippet can run; Bridge must be running.<br />      @type String<br />     */<br />     this.requiredContext = "\tAdobe Bridge CS3 must be running.\n\tExecute against Bridge CS3 as the Target.\n";<br />     $.level = 1; // Debugging level<br />     <br />     this.version = "0.32";<br />     this.author = "Tyzhenenko Dmitry";<br />     <br />     /**<br />      The unique identifier for the new menu item command<br />      @type String<br />     */<br />     //this.menuID = "AutoStackFiles";     <br />     this.menuCommandID = "GoAutoStackingFiles";<br /><br />}<br /><br />function RunAutoStacking()<br />{<br />     var doc = app.document;<br />     var thumb = doc.thumbnail;<br />     var vthumb = doc.visibleThumbnails;<br />     var currSort = doc.sorts;<br />     <br /><br />     function StackPhoto()<br />     {<br />          doc.chooseMenuItem('submenu/Stack');<br />          doc.chooseMenuItem('StackGroup');<br />     }<br /><br />     function CollapseStacks()<br />     {<br />          doc.chooseMenuItem('submenu/Stack');<br />          doc.chooseMenuItem('CollapseAllStacks');<br />     }<br /><br />     function getFileExt( t)<br />     {<br />          var dot = t.name.lastIndexOf ('.');<br />          return t.name.substr(dot,t.name.length);<br />     }<br /><br />     function getFileName( t)<br />     {<br />          var dot = t.name.lastIndexOf ('.');<br />          return t.name.substr(0, dot);<br />     }<br /><br />     CollapseStacks();<br />     <br />     var SortObj = {}; <br />     SortObj.name = "name";<br />     SortObj.type = "string";<br />     SortObj.reverse = false;<br />     var SortsArray = [];<br />     SortsArray.push(SortObj);<br />     doc.sorts = SortsArray;<br /><br />     for (var len = 0; len <  vthumb.length; len++ )<br />     {<br />          doc.deselectAll();<br />          doc.select(vthumb[len]);<br />          doc.reveal(vthumb[len]);<br />          for ( var k = len+1; k < vthumb.length; k++ )<br />          {<br />               //alert(k);<br />               if ( getFileName( vthumb[len] ) == getFileName( vthumb[k]) ) <br />                    doc.select(vthumb[k]);<br />               else <br />               {<br />                    if (doc.selectionLength > 1) <br />                         StackPhoto();<br />                    break;<br />               }<br />               if (k == vthumb.length-1)<br />               {<br />                    if (doc.selectionLength > 1)<br />                         StackPhoto();<br />               }<br />                    <br />               //if (doc.selectionLength > 1) <br />               //     StackPhoto();<br />          }<br />          //delete vthumb;<br />          //var <br />          //vthumb = @doc.visibleThumbnails;<br />     }<br /><br />     doc.sorts = currSort;<br />     doc.reveal(doc.visibleThumbnails[0]);<br /><br />     delete currSort;<br />     delete vthumb;<br />     delete thumb;<br />     delete doc;<br />     <br />}<br /><br />AutomaticStackingFiles.prototype.run = function()<br />{<br />     var retval = true;<br />     if(!this.canRun()) {<br />          retval = false;     <br />          return retval;<br />     }<br />     //app.document.chooseMenuItem('submenu/Stack');<br />     var AutoStackCommand = new MenuElement("command", "Auto stacking", "at the beginning of submenu/Stack", );<br />     AutoStackCommand.onSelect = function(m)<br />     {<br />           //alert('start');<br />           RunAutoStacking();     <br />           //alert('stop');<br />     }<br />}<br /><br />AutomaticStackingFiles.prototype.canRun = function()<br />{     <br />     // Must run in Bridge <br />     if(BridgeTalk.appName == "bridge") <br />     {<br />          // Stop the menu element from being added again if the snippet has already run<br />          if(MenuElement.find(this.menuCommandID))<br />          {<br />               $.writeln("ERROR:: Menu element from AutoStackFiles already exists!\nRestart Bridge to run this snippet again.");<br />               return false;<br />          }<br />          return true;<br />     }<br />     // Fail if these preconditions are not met.  <br />     // Bridge must be running,<br />     // The menu must not already exist.<br />     $.writeln("ERROR:: Cannot run AutomaticStackingFiles");<br />     $.writeln(this.requiredContext);<br />     return false;<br />}<br /><br />if(typeof(AutomaticStackingFiles_unitTest) == "undefined") {<br />    new AutomaticStackingFiles().run();<br />}<br /><br />-== [end of script] ==--

  • Using RAW+JPEG stacking script, but can't get JPEG as default thumbnail for stack. Help!

    I am currently using this script I found elsewhere on Adobe forums. However, doing this function only will stack everything with the raw files on top. I am using a 5D MKIII now and Bridge CS4 can't generate the CR2 previews, so I need JPEGs to see what a file is for general editing. How do I get this stack script to put the JPEGS on top instead of the raw files?
    (script originally posted by Paul Riggot in another forum)
    #target bridge  
       if( BridgeTalk.appName == "bridge" ) { 
    AutoStack = MenuElement.create("command", "Auto Stack", "at the beginning of submenu/Stack", "zx1");
    AutoStack.onSelect = function () {
       stackEm();
    function stackEm(){
    app.document.sorts = [{ name:"name",type:"string", reverse:false}];
    var jpgs = Folder(app.document.presentationPath).getFiles ("*.jpg");
    app.document.deselectAll();
    for(var a in jpgs){
    var Name = decodeURI(jpgs[a].name).replace(/\.[^\.]+$/, '');
    var stacks = Folder(app.document.presentationPath).getFiles(Name+".*");
    if(stacks.length < 2) continue;
    for(var z in stacks){ app.document.select(new Thumbnail(stacks[z]));}
    StackFiles();
    app.document.deselectAll();
    function StackFiles(){
    app.document.chooseMenuItem('submenu/Stack');
    app.document.chooseMenuItem('StackGroup');

    I wonder if you have time if you could test this script for me please?
    What it does (tries to do) is to create JPGs from the raw files in the same folder as the CR2 (raw) files.
    N.B. IT WILL OVERWRITE ANY JPGS IN THE SAME FOLDER IF THE NAMES MATCH!
    So please try it on a folder with raw files only.
    The idea being it might be quicker to generate jpegs from the embedded thumbnail rather than shoot both raw/jpg?
    T.I.A.
    #target bridge  
    if( BridgeTalk.appName == "bridge" ) { 
    AutoStackJpgs = MenuElement.create("command", "Create Stack JPGs", "at the beginning of submenu/Stack", "sj1");
    AutoStackJpgs .onSelect = function () {
    app.document.deselectAll();
    var items = app.document.getSelection("crw,cr2,tiff,raw,rw2,dng,nef,orf,erf,mos,dcr,raf,srf,pef,x3f");
    for (var a =0; a<items.length;a++){
    var JPEG = new File(items[a].path.substr(0,items[a].path.lastIndexOf ('.'))+".jpg");
    tempFile=new File(items[a].path);
    var fileString='';
    tempFile.open('r');
    tempFile.encoding = 'BINARY';
    fileString=tempFile.read();
    tempFile.close();
    for(var w =0;w<6;w++){
    var startJpg=fileString.search(/\xFF\xD8\xFF/);
    if(startJpg != -1){
    if(testJPG()){
    var endJpg = fileString.search(/\xFF\xD9/);
    fileString = fileString.substr(0,endJpg+2);
    JPEG.open('w');
    JPEG.encoding = 'BINARY';
    JPEG.write(fileString);
    JPEG.close();
    var newThumb = new Thumbnail(JPEG);
    newThumb.rotation = items[a].rotation;
    break;
    }else{
    fileString = fileString.substr(20);
    continue;
    function testJPG(){
    var result=false;
    fileString = fileString.substr(startJpg);
    var endTest = fileString.search(/\xFF\xD9/);
    if(endTest > 204800 ? result= true : result= false);
    return result;

  • How to handle RAW+JPG?

    Hi guys,
    Just downloaded LR4 trial, and there is something I can't quite figure out.
    I have a lot of RAW+JPG pictures (shot as RAW+JPG or previously converted from RAW to JPG with other programs), when importing them to Lightroom, I can choose to treat them as the same picture or as separate pictures.
    At first glance, they should of cause be treated as the same picture (because they are the same picture), and they do indeed appear as "RAW+JPG" in LR, but how do I:
    - View the JPG? (not critical, but it would be nice to be able to compare the JPG with the LR results)
    - Add metadata (tags, title, caption, etc.) to the JPG file and not just the RAW file? (I have enabled "write metadata to file")
    If treated as separate pictures, they behave as one would expect, but it is not that convenient to have two of the same pictures side-by-side.
    - Can I auto-stack RAWs and JPGs?
    - Can I write metadata (tags, title, caption, etc.) to the entire stack in one go?
    And please don't give me the same answer, I keep reading over and over again, when other people ask the same question: "Why would you have RAW and JPG of the same image?" That is not the question, but I will answer it anyway :-)
    1. I need JPG versions of my pictures for e-mail, web, viewing on my TV etc.
    2. I REALLY don't want to be dependent on LR in the future. If I have spend hours and hours fine tuning my pictures, and only have them saved as RAW, I would need LR till the day I die. And it doesn't end there, my kids, my grand kids and so on, would also need LR to view the pictures (at lease in the quality I would like them to be viewed).
    ~Frank

    That was also my feeling, that Lightroom's support for such is pretty little.
    Because it is not LR's concept.
    Frank,
    what you could do in order to further make up your mind to which extent LR might suit you:
    Use an alternative picture viewer (e.g. Irfanview) to compare JPGs.
    Copy your existing JPGs to a folder, but do not import them into LR (that means do not LR have creating pointers to them and records in the catalog-database).
    Import your raws into LR (that means you need to have some safe storage space for the image files themselves), and do your developments there. When you think you are ready, export** them as full-sized JPGs, renamed e.g. by a suffix -LR, into your JPG-folders. Do not add such export to your LR catalog.
    Use the alternative picture viewer to compare how you did, compared to your camera's auto-conversion.
    To further ease your mind regarding dependancy on LR: most of your develop settings can be written back to the raw file's xmp-part (that is a sidecar-file for a proprietary raw format such as Nikon's .NEF or Canon's .CR2, or embedded for a DNG, PSD or TIFF).
    This xmp can be read by many other other programs.
    So you would have your raws enriched.
    Plus you could decide to store your exported JPGs *forever*.
    Pretty independant from Lightroom, no?
    Should you want to ultimately rely on raw-conversion results, I would go for different software, e.g. DxO.
    Cornelia
    **exporting means: LR is making use of its records as rendering instructions and writes a completely new file, in the format you specify for this export, e.g. JPG.
    LR is a database, that contains records ABOUT images. It reads from them, it writes to their xmp-part if tell it to do so (choice is continuously or upon separate command for selected images), it can write other output, e.g. a PDF working as a slide show, a web gallery, a print, a book.

  • Comparing RAW vs. jpg in Aperture When Shooting RAW + jpg

    I just started shooting RAW + jpg with a brand new camera. I imported these photos into Aperture. The photos all have jpg as the master with the associated Badge indicating there is also a RAW version. Changing each Badge, I can toggle between the jpg and the RAW versions.
    However, I would like to compare both versions (side by side). If I don’t like the jpeg version, I’ll post process using the RAW version. How can I do this in Aperture? Ideally, I would like to have these respective RAW and jpg versions of each photo in a single Stack to facilitate comparison.

    Sven Erik wrote:
    Excellent! However, do you know I can create separate masters after I've already imported?
    You can do this either one at a time or in multiple selection:
    1 - Select image(s) you want to see both JPEG and RAW masters for (let's say you have the JPEG set as master by default).
    2 - Photos menu > Set RAW as Master (this switches JPEG master to RAW master)
    3 - With image(s) still selected: 'Photos menu > New version from master'
    4 - You now have two RAW versions of each image (the original master version and a new version)
    5 - Select all original versions and then: 'Photos menu > Set JPEG as Master'
    6 - You should now have a JPEG master and a RAW version of each image (the same as having a JPEG and RAW master side by side). The only difference is that the RAW will have '-version #' after the image name.
    7 - You can run a batch change via 'Metadata menu > Batch change...' and use the Version Name Format drop-down / Edit function to change the name on the new masters (I sometimes use the 'Master File Name' and remove all other items from the format field, which leaves the same master name and the file extension).
    I use the 'Both (JPEG as Master)' in Tony's screenshot and then just create a RAW version if the JPEG does not meet my needs for some reason.

  • Duplicate (sidecar) RAW & JPG files in Organiser

    Hello,
    I usually store both RAW and a small JPG file for each photo I take using a Canon EOS 7D. When these are imported into Lightroom 4.4, Lightroom only shows one image, reporting that the associated JPG is a 'sidecar' image. When imported into Photoshop Elements 11 Organiser both photos are displayed i.e. every single photo is duplicated.
    How do I configure Photoshop Elements 11 Organiser to only show one photo for each RAW/JPG set?
    Thanks in advance,
    David.

    Lightroom and the Organizer have something in common : they do not contain picture files. They only store the information about where the files are physically stored. They are a list of those paths (locations). Raws and jpegs of the same shot are two different picture files. So, you can't speak about duplication from that point of view.
    What Lightroom and the Organizer don't have in common is the way they deal with the 'duos' of raw and jpeg files. At the import stage, the Organizer always considers the files as distinct and imports both of them as described by 99jon. LR recognizes the fact that both files are two variants from a single shot and offers a choice of how to import : ignore the jpeg or consider ist as a kind of 'sidecar' file.
    How to use the organizer so that it shows only one thumbnail once they have been imported ? That's possible if you use the visual similarity search : you can choose to automatically suggest photo stacks just after the import stage. Your files will be stacked and you'll see only one photo in the browsing space. You can collapse stacks or expand them in the browsing space. After stacking, any organizing task such as rating, keywording will be applied to both files much like in real version sets.
    I don't think that you really need to shoot raw + jpeg most of the time.
    It may be useful when you are getting acquainted with raw processing.
    It may be to have an instant way to display the pictures on your card when you have no computer at hand. In that case, deleting the jpegs from catalog just after the import into the catalog is the quickest and simplest solution.
    For viewing the raw pictures on your computer without Elements, it may be useful to have another free software able to show the thumbnails of raw files (faststone, xnview...)
    Also, if shooting raw only, it's easy to export a (temporary) ad hoc jpeg version of your import batch from the Organizer to share with friends. It's best done after culling and rating and doing some quick keywording.

  • RAW+JPG renaming/deleting workflow broken?

    I tried to shoot RAW + JPG.
    LR show only the NEF files [RAW] and uses the JPGs as a "sidecar".
    if I rename teh NEF the JPG gets renamed with the same filename and the proper different extension.
    the problem is when I delete the rejected NEF files - the corresponding/relative JPGs don't get deleted as well
    and I need to do it manually in the finder outside of LR,
    am i doing something wrong? I find this behavior inconsistent and it could be annoying if I need to do that with many files at once.
    I can always download the images from teh camera to TEMP download folder - move the good photos to a different folder and empty the JPGs that have not deleted.
    a bit of a cumbersome workflow...
    stefano
    stefpix dot com
    yesterday's photos
    http://tinyurl.com/27fazg
    or
    http://picasaweb.google.com/stefpix/BedstuyFlatbushMiniHaiti300320072309/photo#s5047923753 755028194

    Amazing, so it's actually intentionally 'broken'. At the very very least, mentioning this in the manual would have been nice...(or did I miss it?) I can see where they're coming from as seen from a *particular* workflow perspective, but they are making some pretty big assumptions along the way, all of which can be challenged.
    Assumption (1): RAW and JPG files with the same name are *always* both created in the camera.
    - I'm not sure if I'm the only one, but I have sometimes saved rendered JPGs (from RawShooter) alongside my RAW files. The upcoming(?) RawShooter settings conversion utility will not give the exact same results, so I'd like to keep the JPGs in my library.
    Assumption (2): The JPG is always inferior to the Lightroom-rendered RAW.
    - Not true. Sometimes the camera vendors employ some sophisticated wizardry to their JPGs that can sometimes yield satisfying final results or a good reference for raw editing. I suspect this holds even more for the newer batch of SLRs that supports 'in-camera developing', applying proprietary coloring effects, etc to the rendered JPG.
    Assumption (3): People get horribly confused when they see *choose* to shoot RAW+JPG and actually see two files.
    - Well, I'm probably not the target market, since I'm one of those 'organized' photographers, but ok. If I have chosen to create two files that every other imaging program considers to be different, I have consciously done so, and I do not get confused if I see different files. In fact, I *expect* all my files to show up in Lightroom. Of course having neat options to hide either type of files is a plus.
    As for suggestions to improve this in future versions, I'd say:
    * Make it an option (selected by default) to not import sidecar JPGs and use them only for preview. [mentioned in Podcast]
    * Implement auto-stacking for files with the same name. [mentioned in Podcast]
    * Even better, allow for auto-stacking with similar names (using a suffix, like '-') and images that were shot at the same time. See also http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx/.3bc34b40/1
    * Implement a command to sort the images in all stacks in the current view. This could be used to place all RAWs or JPGs on top.
    * Implement a synchronization feature that synchronizes (selected) keywords and collections across stacks. [deals with mentioned keyword problem]
    * As an alternative to all stack-based options above, simply implement a viewing filter to only show files of a certain type within the currently selected category. This way, people can easily remove all JPGs from view.
    Cheers,
    Simon

  • RAW + JPG

    I just started shooting RAW and imported 152 RAW + JPG today. Only the RAW are showing in Aperture. Any way to make both show up??? I drilled down in the library and the JPGs are there ...
    thanks in advance for any help ...

    From my website www.aperturetricks.com.
    "Ben Long sent me a great script to work with RAW+JPEG imports and I posted that last week. But then several of you sent me emails suggesting additional support for RAW existed and I added that information to my own research and want to share that with you now.
    Like others, I wish the RAW+JPEG workflow were better, but there’s more support than I think most people realize:
    1. Aperture actually DOES import RAW+JPEG. It sees both files and brings them both into the Library. By default it only displays the RAW image. To see the JPEG too, just select any image and press Option-J, (That’s the keyboard shortcut for New Version from Master JPEG.) Now-the RAW AND the JPEG appear together in a stack. If you make the JPEG the “pick” of the stack, then you can collapse the stack and see only the JPEG.
    2. Once you have both the RAW and the JPEG, you will want to be able to tell which is which. Aperture CAN (despite complaints from some reviewers who just don’t know how to properly use the software) display full filenames and file extensions You need to set up the metadata display options correctly.
    - Create a new Metadata set using the Action menu on the metadata inspector.
    - Click the “Other” button at the bottom of the inspector and turn on File Name as the only field to be displayed for this new set.
    - Open View > View Options and set either Set number 1 or Set number 2 in either the Viewer or Browser to display your new metdata set, consisting of File Name.
    Now you can toggle full filenames (With extensions) on or off the images in the Viewer or on thumbnails in the browser.
    You could also just modify any existing metadta set to accomplish this by replacing the “Version Name” field with the “File Name” field."
    Good luck,
    Scott Bourne

  • Just upgraded to 60d and lr 3.5.  Import not showing jpg files in folder and showing as raw+jpg

    the jpg and raw used to show side by side in catalog and in import dialoge now they are "stacked" together, I cannot seem the jpg in the import dialog at all, even though they are there in windows explorer.
    they show as raw+jpg after import.  how do I make them show as separate files???
    I'd like to see the side by side with the new camera

    Edit/Preferences/ Import Options / Treat JPG Files next to raw files as  separate photos  has to be checkmarked.
    Frans

  • How do I transfer RAW+jpg to cloud storage under iOS 8?

    I want to transfer Canon RAW+jpg CR2 files, imported from the camera via the camera connection kit, from my iPad to cloud storage in Dropbox. Prior to iOS 8, I could accomplish this by exporting from the photography workflow app PhotosInfoPro. That functionality is now broken. The app performs correctly when handling pure jpg files, or handling pure RAW files, but fails when handling RAW+jpg. The operation completes without any error messages, but only the jpg data from the RAW+jpg has been uploaded to the cloud. The RAW sensor data isn't there.
    Is there an alternate method to transfer these files from the iPad to cloud storage - either Dropbox or Google Drive? I have tried many different things, none of which were successful. I can get the jpg portion into the cloud, but not the RAW portion. If you know of a method or an app that is performing this successfully under iOS 8, please help. I am at my wits end.

      How can I transfer the photos to the Cloud to free up some space?
    iCloud does not store photos long term. You can share your photos to your Photo Stream to transfer them, but you need to download them on another device, before you delete them from your iPhone.
    Back them up on a computer, before you delete them from your iPhone.
    For example, by:
    Import photos directly into iPhoto or Aperture on your computer.
    Save photos to your computer using iTunes.
    Regards

  • Raw + JPG not working!

    I usually take photos in two formats: Raw + JPG, however when I try to download to Aperture, only Raw files are downloaded, is this normal? where should be adjusted to extract both formats into Aperture?
    Thanks in advance,
    Ed

    This depends on if you're using Aperture 2 or Aperture 3. In 2, there are some preference settings about imports, but I don't recall the details. In 3, there's a brick of import options called Raw+JPEG. There, you can select 5 options. One of those options will import only the raw files. The one that imports both, but sets the raw as master will look similar, in Aperture, except you'll have the option to switch to the JPEG master for that image, temporarily or otherwise, if you later wish. There's a pair of options that work the same way as those two, but favour JPEGs over raws. And there's an option to import both, setting both as masters - with that, you'll see a version based on each master for every shot you've taken, doubling the apparent number of photos.

  • Raw imports fail if shooting in RAW+JPG

    I've got a canon Xsi and set it to record RAW+JPG for some testing. I installed 10.5.4 which claimed to support RAW for the camera. But I could never get any of the images to import.
    I've now figured out what is going on. I was using the USB cable to plug into the camera which uses the Image Capture framework to copy the images to the computer. There is a bug in the image capture framework that it always uses the size of the JPG file when it copies the file over, even when copying the RAW file. This has the effect of truncating the RAW file, causing the RAW conversion to fail.
    To work around this problem, use a card reader that causes the card to mount as a disk drive. You'll then get the whole RAW file and the image will import properly.
    I've filed a bug.

    Welcome to the Apple Discussions. Also if you just shoot RAW I believe iPhoto will import correctly from the camera. Since iPhoto creates a jpg file for each raw that is imported you will still have both types of files in iPhoto. Since I don't shoot raw I don't know if there's any difference between the jpg created by the camera and the one created by iPhoto when importing RAW only. If you get a chance to test it out and report that would be of interest to others. Thanks for the feedback.
    TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto (iPhoto.Library for iPhoto 5 and earlier) database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
    I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger or later), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 6 and 7 libraries and Tiger and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.
    Note: There now an Automator backup application for iPhoto 5 that will work with Tiger or Leopard.

  • How to import RAW+JPG?

    I recently acquired a Canon 30D and am now able to save my images in RAW+JPG format, which gives me the normal RAW (CR2) file and a JPEG file for each capture. This is handy for using the picture styles where the RAW is the normal full capture of colour while the JPEG is processed according to the selected picture style giving, for example, a monochrome image.
    When I try to import these from the card the preview displays thumbnails only of the JPEG images but only the CR2 files appear to be imported. However, looking at the folder on disk reveals that the JPEG files have also been imported but are simply not displayed within Lightroom itself.
    I could of course work with the JPEG files outside of my Lightroom library but would prefer not to do so. How can I get the JPEG files to become part of the library so that I can work with them in Lightroom?

    A search for RAW + JPEG brings up a page load of pertinent entries for me.
    Don
    Don Ricklin, MacBook 1.83Ghz Duo 2 Core running 10.4.9 & Win XP, Pentax *ist D
    http://donricklin.blogspot.com/

  • Import only jpg files from a camera that shoots RAW+jpg?

    Is there a way to import only jpg files from a camera that shoots both RAW+jpg? I only want the small jpgs copied, not the RAW file. I have the USB adapter and am about to go on vacation and wanted to use my iPad to upload pictures to Facebook on the go so I am going to shoot on my Canon 5D in RAW+jpg. All I want to copy to the iPad are the jpg files. Is there a way to only copy one?

    As a Test:
    Hold down the option (or alt) key and launch iPhoto. From the resulting menu select 'Create Library'
    Import a few pics into this new, blank library. Is the Problem repeated there?
    I would note there is a long-standing issue between Kodaks and some versions of OS X - the workaround for that is to use a USB Card reader.
    Regards
    TD

Maybe you are looking for