RDS 2012 re-connection after live migration.

Is there a way to speed up the re-connection after a live migration?
So if i am in a vm that live migrates it feels like it hangs for about 10 seconds the reconnects and is fine..... While this is OK its not ideal. Is there a way to improve this?

Actually 10 seconds sounds like a very long time to me. In my experience using Shared Nothing Live Migration I've seen the switch being almost instantaneous, with a continual ping possibly dropping one or two packets, and certainly quick enough that it's
unlikely any users would notice the change. So in terms of whether it can be improved I'd say yes.
As you can see from the technical overview here
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831435.aspx the final step is for a signal to be sent to the switch informing it of the new MAC address of the servers new destination, so I wonder if the slow switch over might be connected to that, or perhaps
some other network issue.
Is the network connection poor between the servers which might cause a delay during the final sync of changes between the server copies? Are you moving between subnets?

Similar Messages

Failover Cluster 2008 R2 - VM lose connectivity after live migration

Hello,
I have a Failover Cluster with 3 server nodes running. I have 2 VMs running in one the the host without problems, but when I do a live migration of the VM to another host the VM lose network connectivity, for example if I leave a ping running, the ping command
has 2 response, and 3 packets lost, then 1 response again, then 4 packets lost again, and so on... If I live migrate the VM to the original host, everything goes OK again.
The same bihavior is for the 2 VMs, but I do a test with a new VM and with that new VM everything Works fine, I can live migrate it to every host.
Any advice?
Cristian L Ruiz

Hi Cristian Ruiz,
What your current host nic settings now, from you description it seems you are using the incorrect network nic design. If you are using iSCSI storage it need use the dedicate
network in cluster.
If your NIC teaming is iconfigured in switch independent + dynamic, please try to disable VMQ on VM Setting for narrow down the issue area.
More information:
VMQ Deep Dive, 1 of 3
http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2013/09/10/vmq-deep-dive-1-of-3.aspx
I’m glad to be of help to you!
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Hi!
thank you for your reply!
Yes, We are using iSCSI storage, but it has its own NICs for that (2 independant NIcs just to connect the server with the storage) and they are configured to not use those NICs to cluster communication. The team configuration is just for the LAN connectivity.
The NIC teaming is configured using BACS4 software from a DELL server and in Smart Load Balancing and Failover (as you can see here
http://www.micronova.com.ar/cap01.jpg). The link you passed is for Windows Server 2012 and we are running Windows Server 2008 R2, BUT as you can see in the following capture the NICs has that feature disabled
( http://www.micronova.com.ar/cap02.jpg ).
One test that I'm thinking to do is to remove teaming configuration and test just with one independant NIC for LAN connection. But, I do not know if you think another choice.
Thanks in advance.
Cristian L Ruiz
Sorry, another choice I'm thinking too is to update the driver versión. But the server is in production and I need to take a downtime window for test that.
Cristian L Ruiz

VM windows 2008 Cluster on Hyperv 2012 Server FC Disk error after Live Migration of the active VM Cluster Node

Deployed a 2 nodes Windows 2008 R2 SP1 Failover Cluster on a HyperV 2012 Server cluster deployed on IBM HS23 blade.
Disk susbsystem is IBM Storwize V7000. MPIO driver installed plus IBM DDSM.
Lun presented to the VM are connected with Virtual FC Adapter and everything works fine in the cluster until we start a live migration of the VM which hold the cluster disks online.
After migration complete positively, at the moment the MPIO of the migrated VM goes crazy with a lot of errors (source: mpio eventID 16 ) and warnings (source: mpio EventID: 17) in the system event log. After that the disks becomes unavailable.
Consequently everything hangs until power off the migrated vm, so the services on the cluster switchs on the second node.
I try to set the registry key HKLM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Disk\TimeOutValue to 190 as i found on various articles but nothing seems to change....
Any idea?
vannig

Hello,
I've just been through the IBM interoperability matrix and came across this statement:
Hyper-V on x64 based systems is supported with the following guest OS: Windows 2003 32bit, Windows 2003 64bit, Windows 2008 32bit, Windows 2008 64bit.
Clustering of guest OS is not supported at this time. When using Emulex HBAs with Hyper-V please select the settings mentioned in the Host Attachment section of SVC Info Center
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/svc/ic/index.jsp
Thanks

VM stays in Status Stopping after live migration failed/was canceled

I have a hyper-v Cluster running on Windows 2012 r2. I tried a live Migration from one node of Cluster to another node of the same Cluster. It got stuck by around 65% (if remembered correctly). After 45 minutes nothing has changed so I canceled the Job in
the Failover Cluster Manager. The VM went into a Status of "Stopping". After 5 hours it is still in Status "stopping". I haven't found any Information on why it got stuck on the 65% and have just found the error message that the Job got
canceled using Failover Cluster Manager events. But nothing saying why it stays in "Stopping" Status. Searched the Internet but I have Trouble finding anything related to the issue I see.
Any ideas?

Hi Saren90,
Please try to disable the process "vmwp.exe " corresponding to the VM in host's task manager.
Best Regards
Elton Ji
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Users must reboot after live migration

Has anyone had trouble with users needing to reboot after a server is live migrated? I migrate a virtual server from one node to the other the users cannot connect until they reboot. This does not seem right to me. Any help?
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

I'm creating a visual basic application and I am getting super confused by this bit of code.It keeps returning a 404 error at "Dim reader = client.DownloadString("http://themeq.xyz/other-domain/poro/api/communicator.php?i=c&p="; & todo)", but I know the website works and exists. Can anyone see what I am doing wrong, it doesn't work with or without a proxy.VB.netx = "http://www.google.co.uk"VB.netTry proxy = client.Proxy Dim proxyuri = proxy.GetProxy(New Uri("http://www.google.co.uk")).ToString client.UseDefaultCredentials = True client.Proxy = New WebProxy(proxyuri, False) client.Proxy.Credentials = System.Net.CredentialCache.DefaultCredentials Dim nbyt As Byte() = Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(x) Dim todo = Convert.ToBase64String(nbyt) Dim reader = client.DownloadString("http://themeq.xyz/other-domain/poro/api/communicator.php?i=c&p=" & todo...

Server 2012 cluster - virtual machine live migration does not work

Hi,
We have a hyper-v cluster with two nodes running Windows Server 2012. All the configurations are identical.
When I try to make a Live migration from one node to the other I get an error message saying:
Live migration of 'Virtual Machine XXXXXX' failed.
I get no other error messages, not even in event viewer. This same happens with all of our virtual machines.
A normal Quick migration works just fine for all of the virtual machines, so network configuration should not be an issue.
The above error message does not provide much information.

Hi,
Please check whether your configuration meet live migration requirement:
Two (or more) servers running Hyper-V that:
Support hardware virtualization.
Yes they support virtualization.
Are using processors from the same manufacturer (for example, all AMD or all Intel).
Both Servers are identical and brand new Fujitsu-Siemens RX300S7 with the same kind of processor (Xeon E5-2620).
Belong to either the same Active Directory domain, or to domains that trust each other.
Both nodes are in the same domain.
Virtual machines must be configured to use virtual hard disks or virtual Fibre Channel disks (no physical disks).
All of the vitual machines have virtual hard disks.
Use of a private network is recommended for live migration network traffic.
Have tried this, but does not help.
Requirements for live migration in a cluster:
Windows Failover Clustering is enabled and configured.
Yes
Cluster Shared Volume (CSV) storage in the cluster is enabled.
Yes
Requirements for live migration using shared storage:
All files that comprise a virtual machine (for example, virtual hard disks, snapshots, and configuration) are stored on an SMB share. They are all on the same CSV
Permissions on the SMB share have been configured to grant access to the computer accounts of all servers running Hyper-V.
Requirements for live migration with no shared infrastructure:
No extra requirements exist.
Also please refer to this article to check whether you have finished all preparation works for live migration:
Virtual Machine Live Migration Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831435.aspx
Hyper-V: Using Live Migration with Cluster Shared Volumes in Windows Server 2008 R2
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd446679(v=WS.10).aspx
Configure and Use Live Migration on Non-clustered Virtual Machines
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj134199.aspx
Hope this helps!
TechNet Subscriber Support
If you are
TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback
here.
Lawrence
TechNet Community Support
I have also read all of the technet articles but can't find anything that could help.

2012 R2 Cluster and Live Migration

6 Node Cluster with Server 2012 R2, all VM's are Server 2012 R2
4 Fiber SAN's
Moving and Live Migration worked fine in FailOver Cluster Manager
But this time we were trying do it with SCVMM 2012 R2 and just move one VM (Gen2)
Of course it failed at 99%
Error (12711)
VMM cannot complete the WMI operation on the server (whatever) because of an error: [MSCluster_Resource.Name="SCVMM VMHost"] The cluster resource could not be found.
The cluster resource could not be found (0x138F)
Recommended Action
Resolve the issue and then try the operation again.
How do I fix this? the VM is still running. The two vhdx files it was moving are smaller then orginal's , but it change the configuration file to point to new ones, which are bad.
it says I can Repair it... Redo or Undo....of course neither of those options work.
Wait for the object to be updated automatically by the next periodic Live migrate storage of virtual machine vmhost from whatever to whatever job.
ID: 1708
Cluster has no errors, SAN's have no errors, CSV have no errors. the machine running scvmm is VM running on the cluster

How did you create this VM? if this is created outside of VMM, I recommend doing a manual refresh of the VM first to ensure that VMM can read its attributes. Then retry the operation.
Btw, are the VMs using diff disk? any checkpoints associated with them?
Kristian (Virtualization and some coffee: http://kristiannese.blogspot.com )

Change Tracking has been marked inconsistent after live migration

We run a 3 node Server 2012 R2 cluster and backup using DPM 2012 R2
Everytime a VM is live migrated to another node, when DPM next tries to back it up, the recovery point fails with the "Change Tracking has been marked inconsistent" error and a consistency check needs to be done.
This is fine if one VM is Live Migrated but when we have to put a host in Maintenance mode for some reason and 50 VM's need to be migrated off, it them means 50 consistency checks and our backups go from 2 hours to 8 hours.
Is there a way around this or is this just the way DPM works?
Simon Holman
Expeed Technology
Australian Web Hosting

Hi,
<snip>
please give this on a try: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2848751
>snip<
Please DO NOT add the forcefixup key - that will make EVERY recovery point use consistency check workflow under the covers - so we basically abandon using the dpmfilter to track block level changes.
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. Regards, Mike J. [MSFT]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

Rds 2012 r2 - Connection Broker - Round Robin DNS

I am working on building a 2012 r2 RDS setup with 2 session hosts, a web app, and a CB. We are currently using 2008 r2 in a rds farm setup that is working perfectly, but wanted to get some of the enhancements in 2012 r2.. so that is why i am going
down this path.
It sounds like when doing reading, is that we can no longer just drop the fqdn of the dns rr of the session hosts in the RDP client and it will connect. Instead we need to log onto the web access portal and connect that way? I tried the DNS RR
to point to the session hosts, and that seemed to work, but had issues when disconnecting and reconnecting it would push me to another session host.
Is there a way to get it back to using DNS RR and the session broker work like it did in 2008 r2? I feel like end users are going to struggle when working from home and setting up a RDP client. Or do i just not use the connection broker and use a Load
Balancer like HA PRoxy?
The documentation is very lacking on RDS on the new os...
Thanks in advance for any advice

Hi James,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
From Server 2012\R2 we normally have initial connections going to the broker and not to our RDSH server directly as previously for server 2008 R2. Yeah we can use DNS RR for your RDS environment but with DNS RR is that it is unaware if the server is online
or offline while my load balancer is service aware. So in case of a problem with a connection broker the request will be redirected to the active connection broker thanks to my load balancer. DNS RR does not have this feature. So it’s good idea if you can
use NLB or any 3rd party Load balancer for web and gateway services. You can refer
this thread for information.
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
TechNet Community Support

Physical disk for OS and read only filesystem after live migration

I am running OVM 3.1.1 connected to an EMC storage array. I have a situation where physical disks are being used for OS and binary filesystems (i.e. /u01, etc..) rather than virtual disks inside a repository. When a VM is migrated from one host to another, I sometimes get a message stating the size of the disk changed and shortly afterwards the filesystem is changed to read only and I have to reboot to fix the problem. Is this an unsupported configuration or do I have potential problems with my LUN mapping? Has anyone seen this problem before?

I am running OVM 3.1.1 connected to an EMC storage array. I have a situation where physical disks are being used for OS and binary filesystems (i.e. /u01, etc..) rather than virtual disks inside a repository. When a VM is migrated from one host to another, I sometimes get a message stating the size of the disk changed and shortly afterwards the filesystem is changed to read only and I have to reboot to fix the problem. Is this an unsupported configuration or do I have potential problems with my LUN mapping? Has anyone seen this problem before?

RDS 2012 R2 Connection broker in HA mode SQL mirroring issue

Hi,
I have an issue where our two brokers will not connect to the failover database when the database fails over.
Our setup:
Database - 2 x SQL 2012 Standard with the RDCB database mirrored in high safety with automatic failover mode.
Brokers/Web gateways - 2 x server duel role servers in different subnets. They're configured in HA mode
I won't include the session hosts as it's out of scope for this issue.
So the RD database connection string has been set to:
DatabaseConnectionString : DRIVER=SQL Server Native Client 11.0;SERVER=server2\instance2,5555;Failover_Partner=server1\instance1,5555;Trusted_Connection=Yes;APP=Remote Desktop Services Connection Broker;Database=RDCB
So when this was first set, the DB was failed over and it worked. It was then failed back to the correct principal but now when failed over to the Failover_Partner it will not connect.
I've confirmed the SQL permissions and custom port aren't an issue.
Has anyone else experienced this issue?
Stephen Turner

Hi Stephen,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
Did you receive any specific error\Event ID for your issue?
Apart it seems there is some misconfiguration issue for failover cluster. If connections are empty, that means broker servers are not connecting to the mirror server database, most common problem is database security in mirror server. So check all brokers have
full access to the mirror database and mirror database saved folder.
For more information to recheck the steps you can go through following articles.
Window server 2012 | Remote Desktop Connection Broker high available with SQL Server Mirror
https://asithadesilva.wordpress.com/tag/remote-desktop-connection-broker-high-availability-with-sql-mirror/
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
TechNet Community Support

Server 2012 r2 live migration fails with hardware error

Hello all, we just upgraded one of our hyper v hosts from server 2012 to server 2012 r2; previously we had live replication setup between it and another box on the network which was also running server 2012. After installing server 2012 r2 when a live migration
is attempted we get the message:
"The virtual machine cannot be moved to the destination computer. The hardware on the destination computer is not compatible with the hardware requirements of this virtual machine. Virtual machine migration failed at migration source."
The servers in question are both dell, currently we have a poweredge r910 running server 2012 and a poweredge r900 running server 2012 r2. The section under processor for "migrate to a physical computer using a different processor" is already checked
and this same vm was successfully being live replicated before the upgrade to server 2012 r2. What would have changed around hardware requirements?
We are migrating from server 2012 on the poweredge r910 to server 2012 r2 on the poweredge r900. Also When I say this was an upgrade, we did a full re install and wiped out the installation of server 2012 and installed server 2012 r2, this was not an upgrade
installation.

The only cause I’ve seen so far is virtual switches being named differently. I do remember that one of our VMs didn’t move, but we simply bypassed this problem, using one-time backup (VeeamZIP, more specifically).
If it’s one-time operation you can use the same procedure for the VMs in question -> backup and restore them at new server.
Kind regards, Leonardo.

Installed the RDS 2012 Server License per user CAL (5pcs) after not allow over two users remote desktop connection problem

I have successfully to installed the RDS 2012 Server R2 per user CAL (5pcs) Open License after is found not allow over two users to remote desktop connection on this Server problem, I try to uninstall the license and then (internet on-line & telephone
call Microsoft Activate Center get the activate key) to reinstall is still same of the result on below problem.
Select a user disconnect so that you can sign in.
There are too many users signed in
User1 Active
User2 Active
() Force disconnect of the user

Hi,
In addition you can also refer following article for RDL configuration.
RD Licensing Configuration on Windows Server 2012
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2013/09/20/rd-licensing-configuration-on-windows-server-2012.aspx
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Hyper-V guest SQL 2012 cluster live migration failure

I have two IBM HX5 nodes connected to IBM DS5300. Hyper-V 2012 cluster was built on blades. In HV cluster was made six virtual machines, connected to DS5300 via HV Virtual SAN. These VMs was formed a guest SQL Cluster. Databases' files are placed on
DS5300 storage and available through VM FibreChannel Adapters. IBM MPIO Module is installed on all hosts and VMs.
SQL Server instances work without problem. But! When I try to live migrate SQL VM to another HV node an SQL Instance fails. In SQL error log I see:
2013-06-19 10:39:44.07 spid1s      Error: 17053, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.07 spid1s      SQLServerLogMgr::LogWriter: Operating system error 170(The requested resource is in use.) encountered.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.07 spid1s      Write error during log flush.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.07 spid55      Error: 9001, Severity: 21, State: 4.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.07 spid55      The log for database 'Admin' is not available. Check the event log for related error messages. Resolve any errors and restart the database.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.07 spid55      Database Admin was shutdown due to error 9001 in routine 'XdesRMFull::CommitInternal'. Restart for non-snapshot databases will be attempted after all connections to the database are aborted.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.31 spid36s     Error: 17053, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.31 spid36s     fcb::close-flush: Operating system error (null) encountered.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.31 spid36s     Error: 17053, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.31 spid36s     fcb::close-flush: Operating system error (null) encountered.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.32 spid36s     Error: 17053, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.32 spid36s     fcb::close-flush: Operating system error (null) encountered.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.32 spid36s     Error: 17053, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.32 spid36s     fcb::close-flush: Operating system error (null) encountered.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.33 spid36s     Starting up database 'Admin'.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s     349 transactions rolled forward in database 'Admin' (6:0). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s     SQLServerLogMgr::FixupLogTail (failure): alignBuf 0x000000001A75D000, writeSize 0x400, filePos 0x156adc00
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s     blankSize 0x3c0000, blkOffset 0x1056e, fileSeqNo 1313, totBytesWritten 0x0
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s     fcb status 0x42, handle 0x0000000000000BC0, size 262144 pages
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s     Error: 17053, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s     SQLServerLogMgr::FixupLogTail: Operating system error 170(The requested resource is in use.) encountered.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s     Error: 5159, Severity: 24, State: 13.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s     Operating system error 170(The requested resource is in use.) on file "v:\MSSQL\log\Admin\Log.ldf" during FixupLogTail.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s     Error: 3414, Severity: 21, State: 1.
2013-06-19 10:39:44.58 spid36s     An error occurred during recovery, preventing the database 'Admin' (6:0) from restarting. Diagnose the recovery errors and fix them, or restore from a known good backup. If errors are not corrected or expected,
contact Technical Support.
In windows system log I see a lot of warnings like this:
- <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
- <System>
<Provider
Name="Microsoft-Windows-Ntfs" Guid="{3FF37A1C-A68D-4D6E-8C9B-F79E8B16C482}" />
<EventID>140</EventID>
<Version>0</Version>
<Level>3</Level>
<Task>0</Task>
<Opcode>0</Opcode>
<Keywords>0x8000000000000008</Keywords>
<TimeCreated
SystemTime="2013-06-19T06:39:44.314400200Z" />
<EventRecordID>25239</EventRecordID>
<Correlation
/>
<Execution
ProcessID="4620" ThreadID="4284" />
<Channel>System</Channel>
<Computer>sql-node-5.local.net</Computer>
<Security
UserID="S-1-5-21-796845957-515967899-725345543-17066" />
</System>
- <EventData>
<Data Name="VolumeId">\\?\Volume{752f0849-6201-48e9-8821-7db897a10305}</Data>
<Data Name="DeviceName">\Device\HarddiskVolume70</Data>
<Data Name="Error">0x80000011</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
The system failed to flush data to the transaction log. Corruption may occur in VolumeId: \\?\Volume{752f0849-6201-48e9-8821-7db897a10305}, DeviceName: \Device\HarddiskVolume70.
({Device Busy}
The device is currently busy.)
There aren't any error or warning in HV hosts.

Hello,
I am trying to involve someone more familiar with this topic for a further look at this issue. Sometime delay might be expected from the job transferring. Your patience is greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your understanding and support.
Regards,
Fanny Liu
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Fanny Liu
TechNet Community Support

Live Migration Failed After Yum Update on 2.2.2

Hi,
I've live migrated vm's from node2 to node1 (master server). Put node2 into maintenance mode, then reconfigure ntp.conf to sync with our new ntp server. While in maintenance mode, I've also ran yum update which updated the kernel from 2.6.18-128.2.1.4.37.el5xen to 2.6.18-128.2.1.4.44.el5xen. In the process, xen was also updated from 3.4.0-0.1.32.el5 to 3.4.0-0.1.39.el5.
After rebooting, I've put node2 back into active mode. But now I can't live migrate the vm's back into node 2. From node1, ovs_operations.log:
"2012-06-23 11:03:28" INFO=> migrate_vm: vm('/OVS/running_pool/1210_vm05') start...
"2012-06-23 11:03:29" INFO=> xen_migrate_vm: migrate with ssl enabled failed, do failover(no ssl). vm('/var/ovs/mount/54DA5753709A48B3BFAEE65C2EAECCE0/running_pool/1210_vm05') -> tgt_srv('node2')
"2012-06-23 11:03:30" ERROR=> xen_migrate_vm: failed. vm('/var/ovs/mount/54DA5753709A48B3BFAEE65C2EAECCE0/running_pool/1210_vm05') -> tgt_srv('node2') =><Exception: xen_migrate_vm: migrate without ssl failed either.>
From node2 ovs_operations.log:
"2012-06-23 11:03:30" INFO=> ha_join_dlm_domain: =>success
"2012-06-23 11:03:30" ERROR=> ha_set_dlm_lock:failed. lock('6f1cb211-ecef-4ac6-af2b-091fc6fd5966') name('1210_vm05')=> <Exception: create lock('/dlm/ovm/f1cb211ecef4ac6af2b091fc6fd5966') failed. <OSError: [Errno 26] Text file busy: '/dlm/ovm/f1cb211ecef4ac6af2b091fc6fd5966'>
Is this due to the different xen versions after the update? How can I live migrate the vm's back to node2 so that I can take node1 into maintenance mode to reconfigure ntp.conf and run yum update?
Thanks!

The next thing to try is to work though the steps in [[Error loading web sites]]. Though if this is happening on all of your computers it might have something to do with your internet connection. Maybe resetting that will help.

RDS 2012 re-connection after live migration.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for