Re: Issue while doing Order Settlement

Hi Experts,
I have completed the goods reciept step for a process order.
Now I am trying to do the following steps for the order settlement.
1.Calculate Overheads using Tcode : KGI2 - Individual Processing
CO43 - Collective Processing
2.Calculate WIP using Tcode : KKAX - Individual Processing
KKAO - Collective Processing
3.Calculate Variance by using Tcode : KKS2 - Individual Processing
KKS1 - Collective Processing
4.Finally do the settlement of Order in Tcode : KO88 - Individual Processing
CO88 - Collective Processing
I am not able to do these steps.
KGI2: the screen is appearing  without any details,but there is no error message.
KKS2: Here all the cost are coming zero.
KO88: I am getting this message: There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible.
Please advice.
Regards,
Vivek

Dear,
Message no KD256??
You will just check for customization settings for accrual calculation ie cheak for settelement to fiin the result analysis version and check posting rules
Maintain the config in OKG8 for RA category "RUCR".
Check this OSS note 179533
Also check order previously settled?
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Similar Messages

  • Error Message while doing Order CLSD

    Hi,
    I am getting error message while doing Order CLSD...
    Error Msg: Invalid cost element(XXXX) for reservation item 010.
    please suggest me...how to solve this issue.
    regards,
    Venkatesan Anandan

    Hi Venkatesan,
    I had replied and asked for one clarrification and to check same at your end.
    Is your Cost Element mapping done with cost cost center used in order settlement rule.
    Also check for Material Master Change document for Valuation Class change and revert back in this thread.

  • Issue while doing material posting through Usage Decision

    Hi all,
    I have an issue while doing material posting through Usage Decision. Please find below the details.
    Inspection Lot  10000604689
    Material        1730PCPBS.0031
    Batch           QP611097      GQ02
    Out of total qty of 2100 we need to post the following
    To unrestricted use                     2,098
    To sample usage                         2
    Following error appears,
    Deficit of SL Stck.in qual.insp 1,638 NO : 1730PCPBS.0031 62GQ GQ02 QP611097
    Message no. M7021
    Diagnosis
    Shortfall below the specified stock level or quantity amounting to 1,638 NO.
    System Response
    If the message is an error message (E), the above is not allowed.
    If the message is a warning message (W), the system will allow your input, but the warning is intended to prevent you entering a wrong quantity.
    Procedure
    In the case of a warning message, check the quantity entered.
    In the case of an error message, change the quantity or terminate processing.
    I have checked that quantity 2100 of material 1730PCPBS.0031 is in QI stock. Kindly advice what is the issue and why we are getting the error?
    Regards,
    Brijesh

    Hi Brijesh,
    What is the status of inspection lot?
    One of the possibilities I think could be inconsistencies between MM and QM.
    Have a look on SAP note 48815- Checking possible inconsistencies between MM and QM.
    Regards,
    Anand Rao

  • Issue while doing Segmentation using Relationship Category

    Hello Experts
    We are implementing SAP CRM Lean Marketing using CRM 7.0. We are implementing segmentation, mail forms and using "Follow-up Processing of Target Group" functionality to send e-mail/fax to the BPs in target group. We are not using Campaigns. The "Follow-up Processing of Target Group" functionality provides facility to send bulk mail by using the available "Export to Channel" function from the opened target group itself.
    Our business requirement is to do segmentation based on Company attributes and Relationship Category. The output of the target group should enlist the persons related to the Company based on the relationship category selected while doing the segmentation. e.g. While doing segmentation if I have selected company attributes Industry Sector of companies as Agriculture, company type as Partnerships and selected relationship category Has Supplier, then for the Companies matching the segmentation criterion, the target group should enlist all the persons related with the company with relationship category Has Supplier. As a further step the e-mail/fax will be sent to all these persons
    As per my understanding using standard InfoSet   CRM_MKTTG_BP_ORG_CDE and while creating data source selecting BUT000_PER-PARTNER_GUID in the field business partner, I am able to get the list of persons matching the segmentation query as documented in the example above. But the issue is , the output of the target group only enlists matching Persons, it does not enlist the matching company ID /name in the output of the target group. So business is unable to understand the Person enlisted belongs to which Company.
    We tried enhancing the output of the target group in order to add Company ID/ Name , but the issue is the BADI gets Input as persons BP id, nothing else, due to this if a person is having relationships with multiple companies, the BADI is unable to identify which company to choose as Relationship Category is not available to the BADI. And further issue is if a Person is having same relationship category with 2 companies e.g. Supplier for company A and for Company B too , in this case too the BADI is unable identify correct Company to return to the target group output.
    Highly appreciate your early response in order to resolve this critical issue.  
    Thanks
    Ambar

    Hello Experts,
    Elaborating the issue further
    Using standard InfoSet CRM_MKTTG_BP_ORG_CDE and while creating data source selecting BUT000_PER-PARTNER_GUID in the field business partner, I am able to get the list of persons matching the segmentation query as documented in the example above. But the issue is , the output of the target group (shown as an ALV grid , when the target group is opened) only enlists matching Persons, it does not enlist the matching company ID /name in the output of the target group. So business is unable to understand the Person enlisted belongs to which Company. Can we enhance this ALV grid output of the target group ? if yes , how can it be achieved ?
    As an alternative we tried implementing the BADI CRM_MKTTG_SEG_MEM_EX , that is used to define data export from the target group. But the BADI gets Input as persons BP id, nothing else, due to this if a person is having relationships with multiple companies, the BADI is unable to identify which company to choose as Relationship Category is not available to the BADI. And further issue is if a Person is having same relationship category with 2 companies e.g. Supplier for company A and for Company B too , in this case too the BADI is unable identify correct Company to return to the target group output.
    Any suggestion solution to resolve this issue. Appreciate your early response.
    Thanks
    Ambar
    Edited by: AMBAR ADHAV on Sep 10, 2011 11:00 AM

  • Issue while doing GR (MIGO).

    Hi All,
    In my case, I need an automatically created inspection lot via GR in order to record the result. So the procedure in this case is first to create a PO, then GR and then tranfer order (LT01), this will create an auto inspection lot. So I created a purchase order (ME21n) for a material XXX in which QM and WM activated. Then while doing GR (MIGO), I am getting an error message " Change the inspection stock of material XXX in QM only" and system is not allowing to do GR. Can you please help me in this issue?.
    Thankx.
    SuryaD.

    Hi,
            Error message you are getting is because , Inpsection lot has been created for this PO
    Please verify the inspection set up for this material. Unless you clear the inspection lot ( UD) , you can not do the GR & Find out which  type of inspection lot generated ( 01, 08 , etc).
    Thanks,
    Rajanikanth

  • Exchange rate issue while doing incomin  invoice

    Hello All,
            The user has posted PO with frame work order for that while doiing Incomin invoice he is getting the following error. Pls anyone help me regarding this issue.
      Error:
    EXCHANGE  RATE OF CHF FIXED FOR TRANSLATION FROM CHF TO 1.0000
    DIAGNOSIS
    An exchange rate type is used for exchange rate CHF/CHF which is defined as a fixed exchange rate . However the exchange rate with which the system should continue to calculate is different from this fixed exchange rate.
    In OB22 exchange rate type is specified M
    In dev environment fixed  check box has not selected for exchange rate type M.Company code currency is CHF.
    In invoice under DETAILS  tab in currency field - CHF is there and  in exchange rate field - 1.00000 is there.
    Why this error is coming am not understanding pls anyone can provide me solution .
    thanks in advance
    regds
    ramachandra

    Hello
    For this error i am giving more details. company code currency is CHF frame work order has posted in CHF. In PO exchange rate it has picked up /1.0000 and fixed exchange rate check box has not selected. While doing MIRO the system has picked after entering PO number curreny CHF and exchange rate /1.00000. i think this is correct.
                 In OB22 first local currency is CHF ,translation taking transaction currency as basis and Group currency is USD , translation taking first local currency as basis, and index based currency is CHF. , translation taking as transaction currency as basis . for all we are using exchange rate type M . i  am getting the error msg type F5 and message number 768.Doc type it is taking KB. for doc type KB no exchange rate type has assigned.
    Edited by: ramachandra rama on Nov 3, 2008 1:35 PM

  • Error while doing AUC Settlement

    Dear All
    While doing settlement of Asset using transaction code AIBU, I am getting the following error:
    Balance in transaction currency
    Message no. F5702
    Diagnosis
    A balance has occurred in transaction currency 'INR' with the following details:
    Exchange rate '00', amount '       200,000.00' and currency key 'INR'.
    The data in the transaction currency were transferred from the calling application.
    System Response
    Your data cannot be processed in FI.
    Procedure
    The error is probably in the calling application
    Please advice.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kanwaljit

    When you have an asset under construction it should be have an depreciation area in company currecy and when the conrolling area have a different currency the you need an extra  depreciation area in the controlling area currency.
    In the set up from the currency you have to see if there is a entry for
    XXX-INR
    INR-XXX

  • Sap error msg no: AW624 while doing the settlement for KO88

    Hi all
    We are having an issue with settling the order from KO88 and we are getting the following error: msg no AW624.We are not able to settle the order  beacause of this issue and the order needs be settled fast as its open form last month.iam not able to settle asset form previous year.please advice on the same.
    First settle the items from the previous year in previous year 2013: 1190056/001
    Message no: AW624
    You have not settled all the items of investment measure in previous year.line items : 1190056/001 is not settled.it was posted in 2013 was not settled in the periodic settlement in the same fiscal year.
    sap fico
    aman

    Dear Aman
    Please refer following thread and follow Mr. Ravi's suggestion, it may help you.
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/1368717
    Regards
    Rajneesh Saxena

  • Error while doing AIAB Settlement

    Hi I am facing the below error while doing AIAB during AUC settlement. Please do the needful.
    Data for determination of capitalization not managed in area 01
    Message no. AW507
    Diagnosis
    You have chosen a depreciation area, which does not carry the depreciation data from table COEPBR.
    Procedure
    Choose a different depreciation area.
    Thanks
    KC

    Hi,
    This message could be helpful:
    Error AW507
    Please check the field T082AVIEWB-AUTHORITY. If it is not on 2 this is the reason.
    In this case, you can change the value in T093-VIEW1 using the coding as per SAP note 29706 which you have already discovered. There will be no risk involved in changing this value.
    regards Bernhard

  • Error while doing AUC Settlement in KO88

    Hi
    I am getting the below error while doing KO88. I have maintained the Allocation structure for FXA and given the cost element group in the Source field & Given FXA in Receiver category and selected By cost element option aginast Receiver category FXA in Settlement Cost Element field. I am getting the below error while settling in KO88.
    Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA
    Message no. KD506
    Diagnosis
    In allocation structure A1 (controlling area BP01), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type FXA.
    Procedure
    Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure A1.
    Please help me
    Thanks
    Kishore

    Please check your allocation structure , it looks that settlement cost element that you have assigned in the allocation strcuture is not having correct cost element category.
    regards
    Ranjan

  • Issue while doing goods issue

    Daear All,
    while doing goods issue getting the error message : Acct. 200510 for trans./event key BSX, postable directly.
    the same in goods receipt also.
    please help me on this.
    Best Regards,
    Venkat.

    In FS00 ,Please TICK 'post automatically only' for the GL 200510.
    Regards
    jabeen

  • Error : complete allocation structure while doing Ko88 settlement.

    Message no. KD503
    Diagnosis
    During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
    Cost element S10100 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure A2, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
    Procedure
    Possible solutions are as follows:
    If the posting under cost element S10100 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
    If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
    a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
    If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
    You can update allocation structure A2

    Dear,
    Please refer my reply in this thread,
    Error in Rework order settlement
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Withholding tax issue while doing Down payment Clearing - Help needed

    Hi,
    1. I have posted vendor downpayment  for 5000--> TDS was deducted here
    Bank Credit = 4500
    Vendor Debit =5000
    TDS Credit =500
    2. I have posted vendor invoice for 5000 --> TDS was calculated
    Material Debit = 5000
    Vendor Credit =4500
    TDS Credit =500
    3. Now i have transfer the down payment amount in F-54 (As per the above entry how much do i need to trasfer in this F-54 transaction???)
    Note: How much amount do i need to transfer as per the above scenario in F-54? Kindly advise me
    4. For testing i have transferred 5000 down payment for the invoice 5000. But while doing F-44,system is not allowing me with differance amount. In F-44,system is not showing any withholding tax details. Kindly help me on this..
    Thanks
    KB

    Dear
    TDS should have been deducted either at the time of Invoice posting (MIRO) or at the time of Advance Payment (F-48).  So you need to remove TDS code while doing  invoice or at the time of making advance payment in F-48.  If this is ensured there will not be any problem in clearing.
    When inovoice is posted debit will be to GR/IR Account and not to Material Account. 
    Regards

  • Error Msg KD561 while doing WBS settlement.

    Dear All,
    We are settle the WBS element to and asset and its giving the following error.
    Error Msg. KD 561
    settlement from revenue/debit-side downpayment to reciver FXA  XXXXX not allowed.
    My doubt is if their are any debit side downpayments or revenue items can we settle them to asset directly or do we need to settle them to some object other than downpayment.
    Please give me some idea about it.
    Thanks & Regards
    Krishna Chaitanya

    Hi Chaitanya,
    The logic behind the message KD561 is defined in note 115423. Please  review it.                                                                               
    As mentioned in the long text of the message KD561:                                                                               
    Revenues or customer down payments can only be settled to G/L accounts, profitability segments, sales documents, real estate objects, orders  with revenues, or WBS elements.                                       
    reagrds Bernhard

  • Issue while doing Java Stack Installation on NW 7.0 on oracle 10g

    Hi All,
    I am facing issue during Installation of JAVA Stack on NW7.0 on Oracle 10g
    SecureStoreCreate.log
    java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
            at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
            at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:85)
            at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:58)
            at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:60)
            at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:391)
            at com.sap.engine.offline.OfflineToolStart.main(OfflineToolStart.java:81)
    Caused by: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
            at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:218)
            at javax.crypto.Cipher.a(Unknown Source)
            at javax.crypto.Cipher.getInstance(Unknown Source)
            at iaik.security.provider.IAIK.a(Unknown Source)
            at iaik.security.provider.IAIK.addAsJDK14Provider(Unknown Source)
            at iaik.security.provider.IAIK.addAsJDK14Provider(Unknown Source)
            at com.sap.security.core.server.secstorefs.Crypt.<clinit>(Crypt.java:82)
            at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method)
            at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:196)
            at com.sap.security.core.server.secstorefs.SecStoreFS.setSID(SecStoreFS.java:158)
            at com.sap.security.core.server.secstorefs.SecStoreFS.handleCreate(SecStoreFS.java:804)
            at com.sap.security.core.server.secstorefs.SecStoreFS.main(SecStoreFS.java:1274)
            ... 6 more
    Caused by: java.lang.SecurityException: Cannot set up certs for trusted CAs
            at javax.crypto.b.<clinit>(Unknown Source)
            at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method)
            at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:196)
            ... 17 more
    Caused by: java.lang.SecurityException: Jurisdiction policy files are not signed by trusted signers!
            at javax.crypto.b.a(Unknown Source)
            at javax.crypto.b.a(Unknown Source)
            at javax.crypto.b.access$600(Unknown Source)
            at javax.crypto.b$0.run(Unknown Source)
            at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:246)
    Regards
    Punit

    Hi Punit,
    What version of JDK have you installed, check the JCE policy file you have provided during the installation.
    Cheers,
    Phanindra M

Maybe you are looking for