RE: SMTP message transfer with Forte'

Hey,
You would have to use POP or POP3 client (not a lot of work) to retrieve
messages from mail server or write you own mail server (much, much more
work).
See SMTP/POP3 documentation on requirements - implementation, there is
plenty of information on the internet.
Hope this helps.
Dariusz Rakowicz
Consultant
BORN Information Services (http://www.born.com)
8101 E. Prentice Ave, Suite 310
Englewood, CO 80111
303-846-8273
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Salmon [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 1998 4:12 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: SMTP message transfer with Forte'
Hi,
We are exploring a number of ways to transfer data from a business partner
through a secure extent circuit. Since I have been reading a few messages
regarding SMTP file transfer (send), I was wondering if anyone has any
experience in writing a Forte' service object to receive an SMTP message
and then parse it and insert the data into a database.
Paul Salmon
[email protected]
(714) 536-9778 voice
(714) 536-9778 fax
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>-
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Hello Sergiy,
Many thanks. I am in touch with our technical colleagues for the same and will revert back with results.
Thanks
Srinivas

Similar Messages

SMTP message transfer with Forte'

Hi,
We are exploring a number of ways to transfer data from a business partner
through a secure extent circuit. Since I have been reading a few messages
regarding SMTP file transfer (send), I was wondering if anyone has any
experience in writing a Forte' service object to receive an SMTP message
and then parse it and insert the data into a database.
Paul Salmon
[email protected]
(714) 536-9778 voice
(714) 536-9778 fax
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Hi wermain.
Go to Apple Menu > System Preferences > Network, choose Network Port Configurations from the Show popup menu, and make sure that the configuration used to connect to Internet appears at the top of the list. Try also turning OFF all the network port configurations except the one needed to connect to Internet and see whether that helps — if it doesn’t, turn ON again the ones you want enabled.
Mail keeps information about outgoing (SMTP) servers in a separate list independently of the mail accounts themselves. The account settings just associate one of the available outgoing servers with each account. Orphaned or dangling outgoing server entries (i.e. not associated with any account) sometimes cause weird sending problems. Go to Preferences > Accounts > Account Information > Outgoing Mail Server (SMTP), choose Edit Server List from the popup menu, and delete any servers that shouldn’t be there. The Edit Server List panel shows the account each outgoing server is associated with.
BTW, in case you weren’t aware of it, you can make your life easier in these forums by going to System Preferences > International > Language and moving English to the top of the list. The next time you launch Mail, it'll be all in English. You can then go back to the preferences panel and move your preferred language to the top again so that everything else is in that language.

RE: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'

This is one solution when the two sides want to be somewhat independent of
each other.. To use Forte messaging the environments have to be connected,
identical Forte versions, probably identical versions of all objects
involved (rather than just correct IDL), etc. I've toyed with this as well
for a client with two major Forte application development efforts occurring
in completely different business units.
-Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 1998 1:56 PM
To: Giuseppe Sorce; Lenny Hon
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
If you don't mind me asking, why would you ever want to do this? If
you are
talking between two Forte services, why would you not want to use
the native
protocol which is bound to be more efficient since it was written
specifically for that purpose? The only reason I can think of is if
you
need two Forte services to talk to each other through a firewall and
the
firewall is configured to only allow certain protocols through, such
as
IIOP. Is this what you are trying to do? If not, what is your
reasoning?
Thanks,
Sean Brown
Cornice Consulting Inc.
mailto:[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Giuseppe Sorce <[email protected]>
To: Lenny Hon <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, October 22, 1998 10:05 AM
Subject: RE: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
>
>Lenny, I'm sorry but I think that my problem is more complicated.
>No java clients or java servers are involved: I want to use CORBA
as
>middleware between 2 different Forte' partitions (running on
different
>forte' environments).
>For example imagine you have 2 different Forte' applications (say
>application A and application B) in 2 different forte'
environments.
>Now imagine to define an IIOP-enabled service object (Inbound) in
>application A and, starting from the generated IDL (using corbagen
utility)
>to create a IIOP-enabled service object (Outbound) in application
B.
>Application B will be the Corba Client and application A will be
the Corba
>Server.
>They don't use Forte' middleware for communication (they are in
different
>Forte' envs).
>
>Giuseppe Sorce
>
>
>
>
>
>Lenny Hon <[email protected]> on 22/10/98 15.35.40
>
>Please respond to Lenny Hon <[email protected]>
>
>To: Giuseppe Sorce/CSI/IT, "'[email protected]'"
> <[email protected]>
>cc:
>Subject: RE: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
>
>
>
>
>I have successfully used Forte IIOP-enabled service object to
communicate
>with my client Java program that uses VisiBroker 3.2 for Java ORB.
For the
>information, you can read the Forte Web Enterprise manual and the
following
>tech notes: 10950, 10951, 11145, 11152. I found them from Web
manual.
>
>Lenny Hon
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Giuseppe Sorce [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Thursday, October 22, 1998 5:58 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
>
>
>
>I would like to find a way to use CORBA middleware as an
alternative for
>communications between Forte' partitions (I'm using Forte' rel.
3.0.G plus
>Visibroker 3.1 ORB).
>
>I found a technical note (ID 10520) but it is quite old and it is
related
> to Forte' release 2.0.E.2 (!).
>
>Any experience with Forte' release 3 and Visibroker would be
greatly
> appreciated.
>
>
>
>TIA
>
>Giuseppe Sorce
>
>CSI Piemonte - C.so Unione Sovietica 216 - 10134 Torino - ITALY
>
>tel. +39-011-3168736
>
>fax +39-011-3168212
>
>e-mail [email protected]
>
>url http://www.csi.it
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
>'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
>Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
>'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
>Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
>'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
>Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

This is one solution when the two sides want to be somewhat independent of
each other.. To use Forte messaging the environments have to be connected,
identical Forte versions, probably identical versions of all objects
involved (rather than just correct IDL), etc. I've toyed with this as well
for a client with two major Forte application development efforts occurring
in completely different business units.
-Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 1998 1:56 PM
To: Giuseppe Sorce; Lenny Hon
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
If you don't mind me asking, why would you ever want to do this? If
you are
talking between two Forte services, why would you not want to use
the native
protocol which is bound to be more efficient since it was written
specifically for that purpose? The only reason I can think of is if
you
need two Forte services to talk to each other through a firewall and
the
firewall is configured to only allow certain protocols through, such
as
IIOP. Is this what you are trying to do? If not, what is your
reasoning?
Thanks,
Sean Brown
Cornice Consulting Inc.
mailto:[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Giuseppe Sorce <[email protected]>
To: Lenny Hon <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, October 22, 1998 10:05 AM
Subject: RE: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
>
>Lenny, I'm sorry but I think that my problem is more complicated.
>No java clients or java servers are involved: I want to use CORBA
as
>middleware between 2 different Forte' partitions (running on
different
>forte' environments).
>For example imagine you have 2 different Forte' applications (say
>application A and application B) in 2 different forte'
environments.
>Now imagine to define an IIOP-enabled service object (Inbound) in
>application A and, starting from the generated IDL (using corbagen
utility)
>to create a IIOP-enabled service object (Outbound) in application
B.
>Application B will be the Corba Client and application A will be
the Corba
>Server.
>They don't use Forte' middleware for communication (they are in
different
>Forte' envs).
>
>Giuseppe Sorce
>
>
>
>
>
>Lenny Hon <[email protected]> on 22/10/98 15.35.40
>
>Please respond to Lenny Hon <[email protected]>
>
>To: Giuseppe Sorce/CSI/IT, "'[email protected]'"
> <[email protected]>
>cc:
>Subject: RE: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
>
>
>
>
>I have successfully used Forte IIOP-enabled service object to
communicate
>with my client Java program that uses VisiBroker 3.2 for Java ORB.
For the
>information, you can read the Forte Web Enterprise manual and the
following
>tech notes: 10950, 10951, 11145, 11152. I found them from Web
manual.
>
>Lenny Hon
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Giuseppe Sorce [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Thursday, October 22, 1998 5:58 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
>
>
>
>I would like to find a way to use CORBA middleware as an
alternative for
>communications between Forte' partitions (I'm using Forte' rel.
3.0.G plus
>Visibroker 3.1 ORB).
>
>I found a technical note (ID 10520) but it is quite old and it is
related
> to Forte' release 2.0.E.2 (!).
>
>Any experience with Forte' release 3 and Visibroker would be
greatly
> appreciated.
>
>
>
>TIA
>
>Giuseppe Sorce
>
>CSI Piemonte - C.so Unione Sovietica 216 - 10134 Torino - ITALY
>
>tel. +39-011-3168736
>
>fax +39-011-3168212
>
>e-mail [email protected]
>
>url http://www.csi.it
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
>'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
>Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
>'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
>Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
>'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
>Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Re: Mutliple Inhertance with Forte

Hi Gunjan,
No. It is not possible.
What is possible is :
Create interface a with implementation class A,
interface b with implementation class B.
Create a class C1 (who could optionaly inherit from
class C0) and declare (in the proprety menu of
the class) that this class implement interface a and b.
Then, put in the class attribute AttA of type A
and attribute AttB of type B and then use this attributes
to implement the interface définition :
Here is a more concret example for one interface :
Say interface a declare a methode print()
So the class A implementing interface a will
have a Print() method who will done the REAL job.
Say a class C implementing interface a.
C class will have an PrintMgr atribut like this PrintMgr : A
C class will have a Print() method code like this :
Method Print() {
// Don't forget to test that PrintMgr
// attribut is instanciate BEFORE !!!
Self.PrintMgr.Print();
By this way you can obtain multiple inheritance.
Hope this help !
to use interface and implementation classe
coresponding to the interface, and than ins
At 09:24 22/06/98 -0400, Gunjan Vijayvergia wrote:
Can we derive a single class from two classes using tool ?
Gunjan
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD,
[email protected]
SEMA GROUP
France
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

If you mean Multiple Inheritance in C++, Please look at Forte R3 - Interface
Classes.
Venkat Kodumudi
Price Waterhouse LLP
Internet: [email protected]
Internet2: [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 11:49 AM
To: Venkat Kodumudi
Subject: Mutliple Inhertance with Forte
To: [email protected] @ Internet
cc:
From: [email protected] @ Internet
Date: 06/22/98 09:24:06 AM
Subject: Mutliple Inhertance with Forte
Can we derive a single class from two classes using tool ?
Gunjan
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>-
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

RMI Performance Comp. with Forte

Hi All,
I know that this topic has been discussed on the list
already, but I would like to find out whether the
current state of Sun's RMI implementation is like
I imagine it, and I want to compare with our Forte
Service objects too. Basically, these seem to be
issues that negatively affect performance,
1. A thread is created on the server per request, and
there is no way to change this easily (i.e. reuse
threads from a pool)
2. Each call opens a new socket.
In particular, does it make sense to replace RMI with
CORBA for increased performance and scalability? Can a
PC-based server handle loads of about 1000 remote
calls per second (considering the overhead imposed by
RMI/other communication methods only)? or Shall we
compare Forte against RMI.
Thankx,
Babu

Okay,
A method invocation (or function call or procedure call or whatever) is
always a synchronous call. This means, you ask the service to do something
and wait for the function to complete, optionally with return values. It is
possible, that within the method, a separate thread is started, that
continues after the method is completed, but that doesn't change the
mechanism that a method invocation is a synchronous call.
In Forte, it is possible to start a method as an asynchronous call, with the
"start task" command. In that case, the caller does not wait for the method
to complete and return values are not handled. If this method invocation
happens across a network (making it a Remote Method Invocation) then a
socket will be opened when the call is made and closed immediately after. It
does solve the one-socket-per-caller problem, but not the
one-thread-per-caller problem. Also, it does remove the possibility of
receiving return values.
If you want to keep using method invocations as synchronous calls with
return values, but you also want to share resources like sockets and
threads, then you have to use TP-monitoring concepts. You must have a two
way, asynchronous call with an additional parameter. This means, the client
does a single, brief call that re-uses an existing thread and immediately
frees the socket it used. The client passes all required parameters and one
additional parameter to identify itself. In Forte, this would be a reference
to an anchored object on the client-partition. Then the client waits
(possibly blocks). The server completes the request and locates the client
that sent the request. The server invokes a method on the client, informing
that the request was handled. The server now also passes all return values.
The client exits its wait-state and continues.
In Forte (even if you use other mechanisms to hook into Forte), every call
still is a separete thread. If you wish to re-use existing threads, this
must be done using events. So, a client invokes a method asynchronously
(using "start task") and waits. The server start a new thread and posts an
event. Each existing thread is either idle in an event loop or busy handling
a previous event. The new event is added to the queue of all event loops and
the original thread is terminated (the socket was already freed). One event
loop of the thread-pool will be the first one to respond to the event, mark
this somewhere (maybe using mutex) and start handling it. All the others
will eventually respond to the event as well, but will be able to see that
the event is already being handled and ignore it.
This does introduce overhead and it makes your application more complex, but
it also prevents you running out of resources.
Now, the real issue is not the amount of calls per second, but a combination
of calls per second and seconds to complete the call. Using these two
numbers, you can calculate the amount of tasks the server has to be handling
simultaneously at any given time (average). Using the above described
technique you can handle intermittent, large loads, because if there are
more requests than available resources (threads) at any given time, the
requests will simply be put in a queue and handled later. However, if the
over-load continues for a prolonged period of time, the queue will simply
grow and grow and grow until the partition crashes and all queued items will
be lost.
Then it is time for load-balancing. You install several additional servers
and run a serverprocess on each of these machines. And you use a router that
distributes calls across the different serverprocesses. Forte has built-in
mechanisms for that, that work reasonably well. However, if the amount of
calls per second is so high, that even the short time it takes the router to
relay the request still is too long, so that the router runs out of
resources, then you have to use more complex models, for which Forte doesn't
have any ready-to-use solutions. But neither does CORBA or Java I believe.
One more thing. If you combine the above described mechanism to free sockets
as quickly as possible and use Forte loadbalancing, you might solve all your
problems. Just install 6 overloaded server processes. This results in 6
processes times 256 threads per process equals 1536 simultaneous tasks. If
each task is an asynchronous method invocation that immediately frees its
socket, then you never block you're whole server by using all sockets and
you're still able to do handle 1536 requests simultaneously.
Remember, if you have such a large load of calls per second, that all pass
through the same machine (router) then you'll run into hardware limitations
and no software solution can fix that. You have to find a mechanism to
distribute calls across different nodes without using a single router. For
example, cluster clients and have a single server node per cluster.
Pascal.
-----Original Message-----
From: Babu Raj [SMTP:ibcsmartboyyahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 3:42 PM
To: Rottier, Pascal
Cc: kamranaminyahoo.com
Subject: RE: (forte-users) RMI Performance Comp. with Forte
Hi,
I believe in CORBA, ORB maintains the same
connection ( Same Socket) for multiple calls, on the
same Servant object, unless otherwise its ONEWAY call.
But RMI uses the same strategy as Forte, I'm not sure
either on this. Thats the reason, i asked the previous
question.
Thankx,
Babu
--- "Rottier, Pascal" <Rottier.Pascalpmintl.ch>
wrote:
How are CORBA and RMI different then Forte (one
socket and one thread per
call)?
-----Original Message-----
From: Babu Raj [SMTP:ibcsmartboyyahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 3:18 PM
To: kamranaminyahoo.com
Subject: (forte-users) RMI Performance Comp. withForte
Hi All,
I know that this topic has been discussed on thelist
already, but I would like to find out whether the
current state of Sun's RMI implementation is like
I imagine it, and I want to compare with our Forte
Service objects too. Basically, these seem to be
issues that negatively affect performance,
1. A thread is created on the server per request,and
there is no way to change this easily (i.e. reuse
threads from a pool)
2. Each call opens a new socket.
In particular, does it make sense to replace RMIwith
CORBA for increased performance and scalability?Can a
PC-based server handle loads of about 1000 remote
calls per second (considering the overhead imposedby
RMI/other communication methods only)? or Shall we
compare Forte against RMI.
Thankx,
Babu
For the archives, go to:
http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. Tounsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
For the archives, go to:
http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To
unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:
forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

RE: Ole Automation with forte.

Tran,
Here is a piece of code(using Forte Version 3OF2 & Word 97) that we've
used to determine if there is already an instance of Word running:
// Create an instance of a Word Application and activate it.
// If an a Word application exists, just activate it.
if ( aTasks <> NIL and aTasks.Exists(aWordApplication.Name) )
then
aWordApplication.visible = TRUE;
aWordApplication.Activate();
else
aWordApplication = new();
aTasks = new();
aWordApplication.CreateUsingProgID( 'word.application'
aWordApplication.visible = TRUE;
aWordApplication.Activate();
aTasks is an attribute of type Tasks on our window & aWordApplication is
an attribute of type _Application on our window. This code will work if
there already is an instance of Word that was started from a Forte
applicaiton. It doesn't recognize a instance of Word that was started
outside of a Forte app. Hope this helps!!
From: Quy Tran[SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 1998 11:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Ole Automation with forte.
Good Day forte users,
I'm trying to invoke MSWord from a forte application.
I set the objectreference using CreateUsingProgId(This is the only way
that I could get it to work).
The problem is when using CreateUsingProgId, forte will create another
instance of Word. Is there a way to know if the instance already
exists
and retrieve the objectreference of that instance?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Quy Tran
Lumley Technology
Analyst/Programmer
[email protected]
Ph : 612 93186722
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the Sender.
Non-business opinions may not reflect opinions of Piper Jaffray

Hi Aurang
You can call almost all methods using OLE. What is required is to know how to interpret a script to ABAP OLE call. This is explained in the tutorial<a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c1d54348-0601-0010-3e98-bd2a2dcd9e6c">"An Easy Reference For OLE Automation"</a>
Regards
*--Serdar <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com:443http://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.sdn.businesscard.sdnbusinesscard?u=qbk%2bsag%2bjiw%3d">[ BC ]</a>

SMTP: message submitted to categorizer

Hi
A few e-mails are recieved by the Exchange 2003 server but not delieverd to the recipent. When I track e-mails with Message tracking center Tool there are 3 lines in the dialog-box. These are:
SMTP: Message Submitted to Advanced Cueuing
SMTP: Started Message Submission to Advanced Queue
SMTP:Message Submitted to Catagorizer
These e-mails are 1 and 2 days old and of course important for the recipent. I've tried to reboot the server but this did not solve the problem.
We're using Microsoft Small Business Server 2003 Premium edition
Thanks for help

I've had the same problems.
Try disabling Antigen.
1. Stop the following services:
- Microsoft Exchange System Attendant
- Microsoft Exchange Information Store
- Microsoft Exchange MTA Stacks
- Microsoft Exchange Routing Engine
- Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP)
- IIS Admin Service
- Windows Management Instrumentation
2. In a command promtp disable Antigen
- C:\Program Files\Sybari Software\Antigen for Exchange
- antutil /disable
3. Start the stopped services of step 1.
Hope this is usefull!

DDE with Forte/Express

Subject: DDE with Forte/Express 7/28/97 1:01 PM
Has anyone tried feeding data into Forte via an external system? The manual has a few pages containing command etc but I would like to find some actual code/examples. We are looking into feeding data from perhaps Reuter into Forte. At this point I am not familiar with DDE nor Reuter. Is there somebody who have experience in this? How much work is involved and can you send me any examples or documentations?
Internet: [email protected]

I had a problem similar to this trying to install Express 1.0.c. with Forte
2.f installed. I had to reinstall E2 and then install Express and then
reinstall 2F
It appears to be working now.
Chris Capadouca,
Forte First Strike Team
SHL Systemhouse Inc
[email protected]
From: Garry Fong[SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 1997 11:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Forte express installation
RE: Forte express v. 1.0.c.2
Does anyone would give a hand regarding Forte express installation?
I encount a problem where the setup.exe always returns a message
--"...Unable to find forte directory, installation is unable to
continue..",
despite the fact that I have had a up-and-running versin of Forte.
In the warming message, it also mentions that they need version of
2.0.E.2. I only have Forte system software v2.0.F.2. Does it matter? Is it
because I have a latter version of the software which makes Forte
express unable to detect?
Many thks!
Garry
[email protected]

When I try to sign in to my account on iTunes, I get the above error message, along with "Please review your account information". When I then click on "Review"

When I try to sign in to my account on iTunes, I get the above error message, along with"Please review your account information".
When I then click on "Review", it comesup with the page "Create an Apple Account for the iTunes Store"and presents me with the Terms Of Service.
When I click "Agree", It is disabled.
Can anyone tell me why this has happened and how to resolve it?
Please, please, please help.

Count me in as having the same problem. I have been leaving messages in the iTunes for Mac forum where others in there also are having problems. I have been unable to access my account since 11/7/2007. E-mails with Apple have not worked and now I haven't heard back from them since Saturday. I have tried both on a Mac and Windows machine and keep receiving the same error message that:
This Apple ID has not yet been used with iTunes.
I last purchased music with this account on 10/30/2007. I even tried resetting my password, changing my account info, trying on a computer with iTunes 7.4, etc. I have money in that account and 150 songs and 5-6 tv shows that I cannot access. I also just purchased a new computer and cannot sync my iPod with this computer since these songs will not transfer.
Apple really needs a phone number for technical support. Having to deal with e-mails back and forth (and waiting a day for each e-mail) is not a good business practice. Hopefully they will have a phone number in the future.
Either way, count me in on getting annoyed that a week later, this issue has not been fixed.

How to interface a windows DLL with Forte application?

Hi,
I want to use crystal report engine for generating reports from Forte
application on NT client, which requires interfacing crpe32.dll(report
engine DLL) with Forte. Can somebody help me out with a sample c project
(Forte project) either for crpe32.dll or any other DLL.
What are the requirement for for interfacing a DLL library with Forte
application .
Thanks in advance
Shashidahr Patil N S
Bangalore

You can make an empty server only with tpsvrinit that starts your client
listeners and a tpsrvdone that stops them. Be carefull with sharing ipcs
between processes, or your clients may get puzzled!!!
Another choice can be builting a custom WSL/WSH but I haven't done
this yet and I don't know exactly the troubles related with making them.
R.G.
Travis Ward wrote:
How would you interface a tuxedo app with another application that
uses tcp/ip socket messaging? I have a vendor product that offers
a tcp/ip message interface, and would like to know how best to
integrate it into a tuxedo application. I could write a C application
that listens and accepts incoming request from the vendors application,
and then make a tuxedo client call to a service. But this doesn't
allow me to control the listen thread through tuxedo. The C application
would have to be started seperately and would not take advantage
of the tuxedo restart facilities etc of a tuxedo service.

"Network out of order" and "Short message transfer rejected"

Guys,
I have a BB 9300 3G Curve and I have trouble sending SMS. This is a peculiar problem since I
#1 am able to send an SMS problem free sometime
#2 get an error message saying "Network out of order"
#3 get an error message saying "Short message transfer rejected"
Plus, this problem is not specific to a particular contact number. I get different messages (1,2,3 above) for the same number at different times. I have tried putting my SIM in a different handset and it works perfectly fine.
Someone please HELP!

Simply try pulling out the battery and leaving it out for a couple minutes. Usually, that is the fix-all to glitches. If not, you should contact your wireless mobile provider and see if they can help you. Usually, they are very easy to get along with and want to help you. But I think the battery pulling out will help you. It's happened to me before and I had to do that.

Exclamation point and short message transfer rejected

I recieved a short message with an exclamation point, which I googled to be "urgent message", when I tried to reply I got "short message transfer rejected".
I know that the person messaging me is trying to keep his number secret, which is why I was surprised that he even texted me, could it be because of any of his settings?

Simply try pulling out the battery and leaving it out for a couple minutes. Usually, that is the fix-all to glitches. If not, you should contact your wireless mobile provider and see if they can help you. Usually, they are very easy to get along with and want to help you. But I think the battery pulling out will help you. It's happened to me before and I had to do that.

Short Message Transfer Rejected

Why does my Blackberry not let me send messages to my dad? I can recieve , messages from him and phone him, but whenever I send a message to him, it comes up with a red 'X' and 'Short message transfer rejected'.
Why is this happening and how can I fix it?

Hi and Welcome to the Community!
If, by "Short Message Transfer", you mean SMS, then please contact your mobile service provider for assistance...SMS is 100% a carrier-provided service, their is nothing in the BB-proprietary services that is involved.
If, on the other hand, you meant some other messaging service, then please be explicit about what exactly that is.
Thanks and let us know!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

How to enhance DEBMDM06 to add custom segments and do mass message transf

Hi Team,
I have a requirement to transfer multiple IDocs(Customers) as a single IDoc to PI (Earlier XI) system. As I know this could be done by doing necessary config in ALE and execute the transaction MDM_CLNT_EXTR(MDMC specific to customer master day) by creating a variant with proper Extraction Object details. This works perfect with only standard idoc type DEBMDM05/06.
1. I have extended the IDoc type DEBMDM06 to ZEUDEBMDM06
2. Created a new message type ZDEBMDM (using WE81)
3. Assigned the message type to IDoc type(using WE82).
4. Created a new extraction object ZCUSTOMER_EXTRCT from CUSTOMER_EXTRACT by executing
program 'MDM_METADATA_MAINTAIN'.
5. Maintained the view 'VMDMMETA' using SM30 to add custom segments and altered the positions according to new IDoc type.
6. Found a user exit to fill custom segments.
7. Executed the transaction MDMC, in the debug managed the hord coded extraction object from 'CUSTOMER_EXTRACT'
to 'ZCUSTOMER_EXTRCT'.
This has generated a single IDOC for 2 customers but ulike one segment for one customer, it has addes somany segments at same level.
Can we enhance the mass message transfer concept so that we can use it for extended IDOC type so that I can have custom segment types added ?
Thanks in advance...
Arun
Edited by: Arunkumar Ponnoju on Sep 8, 2009 11:31 AM

hi Caíque ;
Firstly thanks for your answer.But your badi is at CRM side, I want to fill BDOC with custom fields from ECC to CRM when I changed them in IE02 of ECC.
Do you know there is any badi after BDOC is filled in ECC.
Regards.

How to make message transfer to a topic from a business service synchrouns?

hi,
I am posting a message to a JMS queue using a business service (say A) and then I am fetching that message from that queue and using a proxy service (B) and a business service (C) for transferring that message to a topic, now I want that my business service A gets the same message that it initially posted as a response back from the topic to make the whole message transfer synchronous, but the problem is that as I select topic on my JMS transport configuration page of business service the text box where I need to specify the URI for the topic gets blocked,hence I am unable to get a response from the topic, can anybody help me out with this as I really want to make this synchronous.
Edited by: user12826319 on Jul 21, 2010 4:36 AM

yes u got it correct...v require a synchronous message transfer to happen i believe d alternative can be that i send the message to topic directly using a business service and expect a response from the topic itself in the form of the message i initially posted, that thing I would manage but the real problem is to get a response to the business service when i use topic, because as i select topic on JMS transport configuration page of business service the end point URI textbox gets blocked...

RE: SMTP message transfer with Forte'

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for