Re: SQL structure reorganisation

HI Experts,
i am working on ECC 6.0 using win 2k3 64 bit with sql 2005 server as database.
the problem is, i have deleted to clients from my server to create some space for a new client copy but after deletion of that two client i didnt get the space acquired by those client. one of my colleague suggested that reorganization of sql structure can rectify this problem, but i dont know how to do that.
Please can anyone tell me which query is used for that or how can i recover the space which is still occupied by the client i have deleted.
thanks in advance
Akshit Sharma

Hello,
this statement is not true:
> But data compression is a totally different thing and also it is not recommended because it makes database works slow.
Database compression is one of the key features of SQL Server 2008 and has and will solve more problems than Data reorganization will ever do.
If you want to reorganize all the tables in your database, you can use this script:
dbcc dropcleanbuffers
dbcc freeproccache
go
DECLARE @tablename varchar(900)
DECLARE @schemaname varchar(900)
DECLARE @cmd VARCHAR (999)
DECLARE @i INT
DECLARE @max INT
SELECT @max= count (*) FROM sys.sysobjects
     WHERE type = 'U'
SET @i= 0
DECLARE tnames_cursor CURSOR FOR
     SELECT schema_name (schema_id),[name]
     FROM sys.objects
     WHERE type = 'U'
     ORDER BY schema_id DESC, [name] ASC
OPEN tnames_cursor
FETCH NEXT FROM tnames_cursor INTO @schemaname, @tablename
PRINT 'Starting ...'
PRINT '---------------------------------------------'
WHILE (@@fetch_status = 0)
BEGIN
     SET @i= @i + 1
     IF (@i % 100 = 0)
          PRINT convert (VARCHAR (20), getdate ()) + ' - Currently updating (' + convert (VARCHAR (6), @i) + '/' + convert (VARCHAR (6), @max) + ') : ' + @schemaname + '.' + @tablename
     SELECT      @cmd = 'ALTER INDEX ALL ON [' + @schemaname + '].[' + @tablename + '] REBUILD WITH (MAXDOP = 0, ONLINE = OFF )'
     EXEC (@cmd)
     FETCH NEXT FROM tnames_cursor INTO @schemaname, @tablename
END
PRINT '---------------------------------------------'
PRINT 'All tables have been processed..'
DEALLOCATE tnames_cursor
GO
When you run this script, the SAP System should be down, as it can cause blocking situations, as it uses Tablelocks to reorganize the tables. If you want to use the online option, replace ONLINE = OFF with ONLINE = ON. This will minimize the blocking impact of the script, as the tables then gets reorganized online. See SQL Server Books Online for more details.
Best regards
  Clas

Similar Messages

  • Message Mapping Nested Structure to key node in JDBC XML SQL Structure

    Hello everybody,
    I'm facing the next problem, I have the following nested structure
    <ns0:MT_Irdoc_ArchivoNested xmlns:ns0="http://ref.pemex.com/PI/FI/ArchivoIrdoc">
       <Header id_consecutivo="">
          <Transaction/>
          <Header2/>
          <Header3/>
          <Header4/>
          <Header5/>
          <Detail>
             <Transaction/>
             <Detail2/>
             <Detail3/>
             <Detail4/>
             <Detail5/>
          </Detail>
       </Header>
       <NombreArchivo/>
    </ns0:MT_Irdoc_ArchivoNested>
    as you can see, Detail is a nested Node from Header Node, and Detail is with occurrence 0...unbounded, I need to generate a SELECT XML SQL Structure as follows
       <StatementName>
              <dbTableName action=u201DSELECTu201D>
                  <table>realDbTableName</table>
                  <access>
                     <col1/>
                     <col2/>
                     <col3/>
                  </access>
                  <key1>
                     <col4>val4</col4>
                     <col5>val5</col5>
                     <col6>val6</col6>
                  </key1>
              </dbTableName> 
       </StatementName>
    now my problem is that col4 and col6 are values mapped from Header fields values, and col5 mus be mapped from Detail2 field of Detail Nested Structure, and Detail is 0...unbounded so it can contain any number of values and must included in the key structure, I tried by mapping the Detail Node to the key1 node, so it will generate n numbers of key1 nodes to include in the query, and the Detail number of nodes are not constant so I can't generate key2, key3, keyn...., so what I need is to create n numbers of instances of key1 node, but the problem is that when the mapping try to generate the second instance of key1 node it gives an error in the fields that comes from Header structure, maybe I'm trying to solve my problem wrong, could anyone give some advices or direction?, thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Julio Cesar

    Julio,
    After placing the below logic in the mapping editor
    Details2 > SplitByValue> col5
    Right click on the Details2 node and choose Context. By Default you will see Details, because Details2 is the child of Details node. I want you to choose the Parent of Details node, I believe that would be HeaderID, am I right?
    If you don't want to do that then,
    Details2 ---> Remove Context > SplitByvalue> col5 will do the trick!
    raj.

  • Converting pl/sql structure (record) to a string

    I need to convert a structure to a string, does anyone know how to do this?
    e.g.
    TYPE Msg IS RECORD /* record to store message info */
    record_type VARCHAR2(3),
    field1 VARCHAR2(10),
    my_dept_nbr dept.dept_nbr%TYPE);
    My_Msg Msg;
    My_Msg.record_type := 'ABC';
    My_Msg.field1 := 'whatever';
    My_Msg.my_dept_nbr := 13;
    Now I want to assign My_Msg to a string!!!

    Not really.
    I wanr to define a series of structures in a common package spec and use the definitions in other packages that will populated them, some of these messages can be complex and large.
    I then need to pass the messages as a string vis MQ to another applications.
    I would like to perform an assignment such as:
    My_String := My_Msg;
    or My_String := to_char(My_Msg);
    or My_string := fncStructureToString(My_Msg);

  • Question about using objects in SQL query.

    I had posted this question in the SQL/PLSQL forum but I guess nobody took the time to understand exactly what I am asking so I decided to try here hoping to get the answer. So here is the thing:
    I have created generic object type "tree" - the constructor takes as a parameter sql query which returns "node_id" and "parent_node_id" - this is all we need to have a tree. The object has all related to a tree structure member functions and one of them is "oldest_relative" (the tree may not be fully connected - it may be more like a set of many trees, so it's not necessary all nodes to have the same root).
    I also have departments table with the following fields: department_id, parent_department_id, department_name,...
    all records in the table w/out parent_departments (parent_department_id is null) are considered divisions.
    Now if I run the following query:
    SELECT "DEPARTMENT_ID", "PARENT_DEPARTMENT_ID", "DEPARTMENT_NAME", tree('select department_id "node_id", parent_department_id "parent_node_id" from departments').oldest_relative("DEPARTMENT_ID") "DIVISION_ID" FROM departments
    my question is: Is the tree object created for every row or does Oracle somehow caches the object since the object itself is not changing but only the parameter for the oldest_relative member function.
    The table only has a few hunderd records and I can't see much of a difference in the execution time btw the query above and query like this:
    SELECT "DEPARTMENT_ID", "PARENT_DEPARTMENT_ID", "DEPARTMENT_NAME", b.t.oldest_relative("DEPARTMENT_ID") "DIVISION_ID"
    FROM departments left join (select tree('select department_id "node_id", parent_department_id "parent_node_id" from departments') t from dual) b on 1 = 1
    where the object is clearly created just ones. (there is probably a better way to do it instead of this join)
    Pls elaborate
    George

    Not exactly sure what the question is...
    As I understand, you are comparing the following two constructor calls:
    +select..  tree('select department_id "node_id", parent_department_id "parent_node_id" from departments').oldest_relative("DEPARTMENT_ID") ... FROM ...+
    +select tree('select department_id "node_id", parent_department_id "parent_node_id" from departments') ... FROM dual+
    These calls are the same (besides the 1st one doing an immediate implicit call to a method of the object being constructed). The number of times these are being called depends on the number of times this SQL projection is applied - and that is determined by the number of rows being projected by the SELECT.
    The latter one is against DUAL which only has a single row. So that constructor is only called once. The former can be against multiple rows. Obviously a single pass through a data set is desirable - which means that the sub-select (use by the constructor) should ideally only be executed once and makes the 2nd method more desirable.
    However, I'm having a hard time understanding why the class and constructor are at all needed. Why pull data from a SQL table into PL memory? As that is where the class will need to cache and store the results of that construction parameter SQL SELECT. And once in PL memory, how does the object effectively access, search and use this cached data?
    PL memory is expensive. It is not sharable.
    PL data structures are primitive - these cannot be compared to SQL structures in the form of tables and columns that can be stored in a number of physical ways (index tables, hash tables, partitioned tables, clustered tables, etc). Cannot be indexed like SQL structures using B+tree, bitmap, function and other indexing methods. Cannot be sorted, grouped, analysed, filtered, etc like SQL structured data.
    It makes very little sense to read SQL data into a class and then deal with that data, cached in expensive PL memory, using primitive PL structures.
    And the same would be true if Java or C# was used. The best place for data is inside the SQL engine. That is the most superior environment for data. It can processes more data, scale better, perform better and offer more flexibility, than pulling data from it and then crunch that data using PL or Java or C#.

  • Importing into a new schema with new logical structures

    Hi,
    I need to export an existing schema from a 9.2.0.3 database into a new schema ( all the objects into a different tablespace - tables & indexes ; from the original config ) within the same DB.
    I am thinking of the following approach :
    1. Export the original schema.
    2. Create new tablespaces for the "new schema" tables and indexes.
    3. Create an indexfile ; renaming the older tablespaces / usernames.
    4. Create the new user and grant appropriate privileges.
    5. Login as the new user and run the indexfile
    Am I missing out any vital points ? Would the pl/sql structures associated with the schema be imported in ok ? Any associated complications that I should be prepared for ?
    Unfortunately there isnt a test server in place to test it out before hand.
    Please advice.

    You missed a step. After you created the indexfile.sql and changed the tablespace names. You are supposed to run the indexfile.sql. That will pre-create the objects. You also have to remove at the comment block indicators: "REM", else it just tries to create indexes. You will also have to ad the "ignore=y" to your imp command, else it will try the create the objects and fail.
    Unlimited tablespace shouldn't be an issue.

  • Running  sql scripts from different directory

    Hi
    I have sql scripts in different directories as follows:
    D:\myapp\sql
    - load.sql
    - init.sql
    D:\myapp\sql\schema
    -users.sql
    -structure.sql
    D:\myapp\sql\populate\
    - data1.sql
    - data2/sql
    load.sql call all the other scripts as below:
    @init.sql
    @schema\users.sql
    @schema\structure.sql
    @populate\data1.sql
    @populate\data2.sql
    All my scripts run correctly when I run load.sql from D:\myapp\sql on comand prompt.
    I need a way to run this script from a different directory say D:\ or C:\
    I am writing a installer which will execute from a different directory.
    Right now I get a file not found error for scripts within schema an populate folder.
    Please let me know how can I make this work from a different directory.
    Thanks
    kelvin

    Hi peter. i think you cannot run files spread across different locations.
    --the method which u specified always looks to the defined path                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • SQL from PLSQL Table

    Hi,
    I have a PLSQL Table with two columns.
    Is there a way where i can read the PLSQL Table data into SQL.
    Below is the sample code.
    Is there a way to get distinct records of contact_person and party_id
    IF x_msg_tbl.COUNT > 0
    THEN
    FOR i IN x_msg_tbl.FIRST .. x_msg_tbl.LAST
    LOOP
    IF x_msg_tbl.EXISTS (i)
    THEN
    LOG(x_msg_tbl(i).contact_person);
    LOG(x_msg_tbl(i).party_id);
    LOG(i);
    END IF;
    END LOOP;
    END IF;
    Thanks,
    Srikanth

    > Is there a way where i can read the PLSQL Table data into SQL.
    Pet peeve of mine - calling an array or collection a PL/SQL "table". There is no such thing as a PL/SQL table. The term "table", especially in the RDBMS context we're using PL/SQL, has a very specific meaning.
    And an array or collection in PL/SQL is nothing at all like a table.
    But because of this term, developers are under the very misguided impression that arrays/collections in PL/SQL can be treated as tables. To the point where they want to use SQL against them.. because they are mistakenly and very incorrectly called "tables".
    SQL against a PL/SQL structure is expensive. Why? Because the SQL engine cannot run against data structures in the PL/SQL engine. That data structure needs to be 'shipped' from PL/SQL to SQL, cast into a SQL structure, in order for the SQL engine to run SQLs against it.
    Which begs the question then - why is that data not in the SQL engine in the first place? Something like a temp session table will be a lot more flexible, scalable and a lot faster.
    The best place for data is in Oracle tables. Not in PL/SQL collections are arrays.
    Why then PL/SQL collections and arrays? For the same reason these primitive data structures exist in most other 3GL languages. Dealing with local programming data in a structure way. And in PL/SQL specifically, to create a larger buffer for shipping data between PL/SQL and SQL (bulk processing) in order to reduce context switching. It is not intended as an alternative to a database table.
    And as soon as you want to use SQL against it, you are saying you want it to be like a database table. In which case why are you not using a database table?

  • Why DDL is SQL?

    Even though any of the DDL or DML commands do not query to the database, why are they considered as a part of SQL (Structured Query Language). I tried to find the answer at many a locations, but could not find it. Kindly Help
    Thanks,
    Ram

    Kiran wrote:
    SQL is not only data retreival language.
    This sql is separates into multi parts
    DDL - which requests db create objects /alter/ drop objects...
    DML - which request db to manipulate the data
    DRL - Data retrieval - what you are looking for..
    TCL - transaction control language - request db to save the chagnes
    ... So SQL is language used to request db for different operations in proper way.Surely DRL (never heard of it) and DML are just normal standard SQL as defined
    by the ANSI standard?
    And would not a better definition of TCL be "determines the visibility of different users' data to each
    other in a multi-user system?
    I think for most people "SQL" is what you call DRL and DML?
    Another difference would be that only DBAs use DDL, whereas users (end-users or programmers) use SQL + TCL.
    Obviously though, senior programmers may use DDL and with XE, anyone can use it to test proof of concept stuff
    without messing up a test server for anyone else?
    Interesting question - it's only when you're forced to actually think about these things that they become clearer - IMHO,
    the best way to understand something is to have to teach it to a class.
    Paul...
    Edited by: Paulie on 26-Apr-2012 13:50

  • Subject: Why creation of sql profiles take forever

    I am on Oracle 10.2.0.4 on HP UNIX 11i. I am creating sql profiles using following logic. Sometimes sql profile is generated in 1-2 minutes. Many times , even after an hour, no sql profile is created and I get timeout errors . I increased time limit from 3600 (1 hr) to 7200 (2 hrs), still timeout error, why?
    -- Tuning task created for specific a statement from the AWR.
    DECLARE
    l_sql_tune_task_id VARCHAR2(100);
    BEGIN
    l_sql_tune_task_id := DBMS_SQLTUNE.create_tuning_task ( sql_id => '$SQLSTMTID', scope =
    DBMS_SQLTUNE.scope_comprehensive, time_limit => 3600, task_name => '${SQLSTMTID}_AWR_tuning_task', description => 'Tuning task for statement ${SQLSTMTID} in AWR.');
    --DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('l_sql_tune_task_id: ' || l_sql_tune_task_id);
    END;
    EXEC DBMS_SQLTUNE.execute_tuning_task(task_name => '${SQLSTMTID}_AWR_tuning_task');

    Depending on the complexity of the statement and the underlying objects, the sql tuning advisor will have differing amounts of work to do working through "statistical checks, access path analysis, SQL structure analysis and sql profiling".
    Perhaps see V$ADVISOR_PROGRESS?

  • PHP and SQL

    Is it possible to use php to display records from an SQL (not
    MySQL) database hosted on a separate server? I don't need how-to
    details at this point, just whether or not it is possible.
    Thanks

    BrianArena wrote:
    > So is there a difference between Microsoft SQL and
    (non-Microsoft) SQL. The boss didn't mention "Microsoft" SQL, just
    SQL.
    Microsoft SQL Server is just one of many database systems
    that use SQL
    (Structured Query Language), the standard language for
    communication
    with a relational database. SQL is a common standard used by
    MySQL,
    PostgreSQL, Access, Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, and many
    other
    database systems.
    Unfortunately, although SQL is a standard, each database
    system uses its
    own dialect. The basic commands are the same, but the finer
    details
    differ according to the database system.
    David Powers, Adobe Community Expert
    Author, "The Essential Guide to Dreamweaver CS3" (friends of
    ED)
    Author, "PHP Solutions" (friends of ED)
    http://foundationphp.com/

  • What is SQL Query

    Dear all,
    what is meant by SQL Query?
    I have a report which is directly in production and not in development.its a user created program.
    some one said that it is SQL query.
    What is meant by it ?
    Is there any name for that SQL query?
    If yes,how can I find it?

    Hi,
      SQL Query means select statement u r getting the data from the database table.
    Standard SQL
    SQL (Structured Query Language) is a largely standardized language for accessing relational databases.  It can be divided into three areas:
    ·         Data Manipulation Language (DML)
    Statements for reading and changing data in database tables.
    ·         Data Definition Language (DDL)
    Statements for creating and administering database tables.
    ·         Data Control Language (DCL)
    Statements for authorization and consistency checks.
    Each database has a programming interface that allows you to access the database tables using SQL statements.  The SQL statements in these programming interfaces are not fully standardized. To access a specific database system, you must refer to the documentation of that system for a list of the SQL statements available and their correct syntax.
    The Database Interface
    To make the R/3 System independent of the database system with which you use it despite the differences in the SQL syntax between various databases, each work process on an application server has a database interface. The R/3 System communicates with the database by means of this interface.  The database interface converts all of the database requests from the R/3 System into the correct Standard SQL statements for the database system. To do this, it uses a database-specific component that shields the differences between database systems from the rest of the database interface.  You choose the appropriate layer when you install the R/3 System.
    There are two ways of accessing the database from a program - with Open SQL or Native SQL.
    Open SQL
    Open SQL statements are a subset of Standard SQL that is fully integrated in ABAP. They allow you to access data irrespective of the database system that the R/3 installation is using. Open SQL consists of the Data Manipulation Language (DML) part of Standard SQL; in other words, it allows you to read (SELECT) and change (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE) data.
    Open SQL also goes beyond Standard SQL to provide statements that, in conjunction with other ABAP constructions, can simplify or speed up database access. It also allows you to buffer certain tables on the application server, saving excessive database access. In this case, the database interface is responsible for comparing the buffer with the database. Buffers are partly stored in the working memory of the current work process, and partly in the shared memory for all work processes on an application server. Where an R/3 System is distributed across more than one application server, the data in the various buffers is synchronized at set intervals by the buffer management. When buffering the database, you must remember that data in the buffer is not always up to date. For this reason, you should only use the buffer for data which does not often change. You specify whether a table can be buffered in its definition in the ABAP Dictionary. 
    Native SQL
    Native SQL is only loosely integrated into ABAP, and allows access to all of the functions contained in the programming interface of the respective database system. Unlike Open SQL statements, Native SQL statements are not checked and converted, but instead are sent directly to the database system. When you use Native SQL, the function of the database-dependent layer is minimal. Programs that use Native SQL are specific to the database system for which they were written. When writing R/3 applications, you should avoid using Native SQL wherever possible. It is used, however, in some parts of the R/3 Basis System - for example, for creating or changing table definitions in the ABAP Dictionary.
    The ABAP Dictionary
    The ABAP Dictionary, part of the ABAP Workbench, allows you to create and administer database tables.  Open SQL contains no statements from the DDL part of Standard SQL. Normal application programs should not create or change their own database tables. 
    The ABAP Dictionary uses the DDL part of Open SQL to create and change database tables. It also administers the ABAP Dictionary in the database.  The ABAP Dictionary contains metadescriptions of all database tables in the R/3 System. Only database tables that you create using the ABAP Dictionary appear in the Dictionary. Open SQL statements can only access tables that exist in the ABAP Dictionary.
    Authorization and Consistency Checks
    The DCL part of Standard SQL is not used in R/3 programs. The work processes within the R/3 System are logged onto the database system as users with full rights.  The authorizations of programs or users to read or change database tables is administered within the R/3 System using the R/3 authorization concept.  Equally, transactions must ensure their own data consistency using the R/3 locking concept.  For more information, refer to Authorization Concept and Programming Database Updates.
    Plzz reward points if it helps.
    Edited by: manjari kotta on Dec 18, 2007 7:29 AM

  • SQL data extraction?

    Hi,
    can nay one here tell me what is SQL data extraction?
    in one on my requirements it was written simply SQL data extraction as flat file
    then modelling the data flow for the falt file to the BW.
    is it something related to database?
    explain me
    Thanks,
    Ravi

    Hi,
    it means that your flat file will be generated out of an database by SQL means (SQL = Structured Query Language).
    For instance your flat file will have the data returned by a statement like:
    SELECT FIELD1, FIELD2, FIELD3 FROM TABLE.
    The above is SQL but it can definitively be more complex (several tables, filters, grouping/aggregation...)
    Your flat file will then be loaded in your BW.
    Hope this helps...
    Olivier.

  • Distinct in PL/SQL TABLE

    Hi All,
    I am getting PL/SQL Table as an input to my program. Now before starting up on any logic in the program I want to find the distinct values in one of the column of PL/SQL Table. How can I do that.
    Suppose PL/SQL Table is like this
    +++++++++++++++
    TYPE XXDUMMYRec IS RECORD
    (Authorization_Number Varchar2)
    XXDUMMYTbl IS TABLE OF XXDUMMYRec
    INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
    Now say this type is input to my procedure and it's having 10 Records.
    I want to fist know the distinct values in this PL/Sql Table.
    +++++++++++++++
    Please suggest.
    Thanks
    Sachin

    > I guess what you can do is use TABLE pseudo function. It will convert the Pl/Sql table
    into the table which u can query.
    Horrible approach - as that is saying "This PL/SQL array/table structure sucks! I want to run SQL on it to make it usable!!"
    And then you proceed to copy and cast the the PL/SQL data structure into a SQL structure that the SQL engine can access and understand.
    A great way to make code slower - pushing and pulling to/fro PL/SQL and SQL because of your poor lack of choice of using the correct structure in the first place.
    A PL/SQL "table" is a huge misnomer.. as it is absolutely NOTHING at all like a table within the Oracle context. We know tables as very effective and fast and flexible structures that can be processed in all kinds of funky and froody ways using SQL.
    A PL/SQL "table" is just a plain and primitive array/collection. And is nothing at all like a table. When you want to use SQL on that primitive structure, you need to ask yourself 'Why?". And you need to make sure that your reasons are technically sound. Else your code will be slow, will not scale, and can do some serious damage to PGA memory.

  • Who know how to handle pl/sql table return from stored procedure calling from jsp

    I have some stored procedure which return pl/sql table (index by table), It is look like an array. how jdbc handle this?
    CallableStatement cs = con.prepareCall("EXECUTE bill.getcountry(?,?)");
    cs.setInt(1, cid);
    cs.registerOutParameter(2, java.sql.Types.VARCHAR);// ARRAY?
    ResultSet rs = cs.executeQuery();
    Array array = (Array) rs.getObject (1);
    ResultSet array_rset = array.getResultSet ();

    Not that familiar with the OCI (Oracle Call Interface), but I think this call will be problematic - the OCI deals with SQL data types and not with PL/SQL structures.
    The OCI has since Oracle 8i sported an object call interface (see OCI Runtime Environment for Objects for details).
    This allows you to use the CREATE TYPE command to create advance user data types - and these are supported by the SQL engine, PL/SQL engine and external languages via the OCI.
    So you need to have a look at the Perl-DBI documentation to see how it supports Oracle object types and consider using these. As for internal PL/SQL data structures. These are not supported by the SQL engine and I would expect limited or no support in the OCI for these. Anyway, using SQL data types makes a lot more sense ito flexibility and transparency across languages and environments.

  • Connecting to a sql server database using netbeans 5.5

    hi all
    if you please could any body tell me detailed steps for establishing a connection to a sql server database using netbeans 5.5
    i need to know what driver to use and the format of the url i use in making a new connection
    thanks

    Uhm SQL (Structured Query Language) is like the base
    of all other type like MySQL and Oracle. Um, given the context I think the person was referring to "Microsoft SQL Server". Sometimes people will cut to the chase and refer to the product as "SQL". At those times it's understood by all parties that we're not talking about the query language, rather the Microsoft product.
    I think this is one of those times.
    See
    something i found in two seconds with the wonder of
    google http://sqlzoo.net/ & http://sqlzoo.net/w.htm
    It's commendable that you're using Google. I'd argue that the OP should be making better use of it, too. But I don't think your response is applicable to this context. JMO, of course.
    %

Maybe you are looking for

  • The difference between Cisco SFP Module GLC-SX-MMD and GLC-SX-MMD ?

    The two modules seem to be similar, What's the difference between GLC-SX-MM and GLC-SX-MMD?

  • Placing a PDF with ICC profile embedded

    If I place a PDF with a ICC profile embedded, InDesign doesn't take in consideration it. In the case that the Indd colour workspace is different from the ICC embedded in the PDF, when I export to PDF the color conversion is wrong. For example the PDF

  • How to recreate capture for oracle 10gR2 in window

    Hi Experts, After I got the archived issues, I restarted capture process in vmsdbhq by strmadmin account and then I saw the messages as: WAITING FOR REDO: LAST SCN MINED 6134217037123. SQL> DECLARE 2 -- Declare variable to hold instantiation SCN 3 is

  • IWeb '08 Hyperlink inspector useless and shadowed - Why?

    I just upgraded to iWeb '08 and have a new website that my navigation menu items do not work correctly when published to the web. They are directed toward my .mac website instead of a page of my choice that is published in another folder and uploaded

  • LSO Test Player

    Hi, Is it possible to change the text of a button which is in the LSO Test Player application? We would like to amend the text for the finish test cmd button. If this is not the best forum for this, please can you suggest where would be more appropri