Reason for Table Partially Active

HI experts,
I am working with table FKKVK  with APPEND structures.This table become partially active after sometime.
I dont know the resons that why this table become partially active.
I have checked that :-
1) All the append structures are also active.
2) all check tables are also ACTIVE.
3) all the domains all also ACTIVE.
Please suggest the reason that why FKKVK table become PARTIALLY ACTIVE.
Thanks,
Sampat Tandon

Hi,
   Tough you have activated all the objects separately, your table is changed now by a append structure which means that you will have to adjust the table accordingly to activate it. So to activate your table follow the below process,
Goto your table -? Utilities -> database utility -> Adjust & activate. this will make sure that your table is completely active and all the changes are in effect.
Please let me know if you need further details.
Thanks!
Praveenkumar T.

Similar Messages

  • I want to know Reason for delay in activation of ODS

    Hi,
    I am using 3.x ver. normally ODS activation took 21 - 30 mins to activate but sometimes it took 6-8 hrs to activate.
    for eg.
    Yesterday it took 21 mins to activate 9,24,033 records and it added records were u201C1847245u201D but to day it took 8 hrs 13 sec to activate 877,560 records and it added  u201C3507974u201D.
    I checked the server also at that time server had not too much load.
    This job started at 07:13 and finished at 15:26.I checked job log also.
    07:13   SQL-END:22:08:2009 07:13:40:00:00:27
    15:26   Activation start at 07:13:40
    15:26  Activation finished at 15:26
    15:26 Request.......
    15:26 Request.....
    15:26 Data pkgs.......
    could you please help me to findout the reason for delay in activation of ODS. I am not able to findout what happened in first two lines in above job log.
    Thanks,
    Manish

    Hi Manish,
    When you want the resolution, you should have answered the quetion made by Markus Doehr, He such a qualified consultant you did care to follow up your issue.
    Thank you,
    Prasaad

  • Ekpo table partially active

    Hi Experts,
    I have created include structure CI_EKPODB in ekpo table by double click and added some fields in this structure.Then I deleted these fields from the structure.Now the table ekpo showing partially active.whenever i try to activate the table showing error that some fields are deleted from the table.
    Can you please advice how to activate ekpo table.

    Hi Shahid,
    You have to save and activate the database.
    GotoSe11->Table name>Utilitiies>Database Object>Database Utility> Save and activate database.
    It will activate and adjust the datase.
    Hope it helps you.
    Thanks
    Arbind
    Edited by: Arbind Prasad on Feb 26, 2011 8:56 PM

  • How to remove fields from view V_QCMBSEG for table BSEG

    Hi
    By mistake have appended 5 fields in standard table BSEG,  after that i have deleted that appended structure from table, while deleting from different views network got disconnected i lost connection from server.
    So process get terminated and those fields left in view V_QCMBSEG.
    Because of this table partially activated.... is there any way to delete it
    Thanks

    its not activating ...its displaying error
    Field BSEG-ZZCHANNEL is still being used as a view field in view V_QCMBSEG
    Field BSEG-ZZPROD is still being used as a view field in view V_QCMBSEG
    Field BSEG-ZZPROJ is still being used as a view field in view V_QCMBSEG
    Field BSEG-ZZRECODE is still being used as a view field in view V_QCMBSEG
    Field BSEG-ZZSTATE1 is still being used as a view field in view V_QCMBSEG

  • Performance ME51 table EBKN partially active

    Hello group,
    we suddenly had a performance issue, and we found that suddenly table EBKN appeared as "patially active" in the database. After activating the performance problems were gone. But we have no clue as to how the table got the status "partially active" and what this means. We got no errors or warnings when activating.
    Doe sanyone have a clue as to what the cause is for the status "partially active"?
    Regards, Léon Hoeneveld

    Hi,
    > I've checked with SE01 Transport organizer if any transport contained table EBKN.
    it's not necessarily the table but could be one of the includes ....  .
    Partially active means that a part of the table (e.g. an include) was not active while the table (the part without the include) was active. You can try to find that part and search that in transports.
    In the cases i had i was like this.
    Regaring your performance problems: I wonder if they have to do with a partially activated table. Honestly i doubt it.
    Programs working on partially activated tables should either work or dump but i never heard of performance problems
    related to partially activated tables....
    Kind regards,
    Hermann

  • Table name for reason for action

    Hi Experts
    Can anyone tell me the table name which stores the reason for action codes?
    Ineed to change them
    SM30
    T530
    Edited by: Sikindar on Mar 9, 2010 11:46 AM

    Table - T530, execute via se16
    View - V_T530, execute via sm35

  • Reason for dim fact tables ratio

    Friends.
    What is the exact reason for Dim tables not be greater than 20 % of Fact tables.
    How does that really impact performance?

    Hi,
    In an extended star schema, dimension tables stores the DIM IDs and SID IDs to access the data from the actual characteristics. These dimension tables are attached with fact table with DIM IDs. Now if the size of the DIM table is as large as the size of fact table, then the cause of DIM table will not be used at all. It is as good as referring the master data for each record from fact table itself.
    That's why it is ideally suggested that the ratio size of DIM table to that of fact table is 1:10.
    Hope this info helps you.
    Regards,
    Yogesh.

  • I am passing range table from the method of ODATA Service to FM but In FM range table is becoming initial.What would be the reason for the same?

    I am passing range table from the method of ODATA Service to FM but In FM range table is becoming initial.What would be the reason for the same?

    Vinod, Can you share detail on how are you sending and how are you reading.

  • Key Board Shortcut for toggling between Activity table and Activity Detail

    Is there any keyboard shortcut for toggling between Activity table and activity detail windows. It if frustrating to use mouse while tweaking relationships of activities.

    Unfortunately, there are no shortcuts for this. Prior to the Oracle acquisition, Primavera had it as a goal for R7 to allow the operator to keep their hands on the keyboard most of the time, but this feature didn't make it into the final code. I feel your pain!

  • No database table exists for table ZTAB1 after ORA-01438

    Dear friends,
    We have a problem in our test system.
    One developer performed a transport which tried to change column from length 11 to 10 and after the transport, table is missing from database. We observed ABAP dumps DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR with ORA-01438 which suggested us that there was some problem with field lenght change. After discussin, we have find out the culprate filed.
    But, with me now problem is Partially active table which Does not exist in the database.
    So now, what i should do to fix this problem.. Shuld i again increase filed length manually in test system and then try to perform SE14>Continue adjustment or what ?
    In SE14 : Analyze Adjustment provide this information :
    Seq of steps
       1 Initialization
       2 Dropping of indexes, renaming of original table
       3 No action
       4 Activation of transparent table
       5 Conversion of data to new table, deletion of renamed table
       6 Creation of sec. indexes
        Adjustment terminated in step 5
    Initial table                         Table type                 Status
    ZTAB1 Transparent                Renamed
    Renamed original table
    QCMZTAB1                        transparent                Existent
    Tgt.table
    ZTAB1 Transparent                Renamed
    thanks
    ashish

    I had tried to reactivate table.. but it will not work as I had Terminated conversion : Adjustment terminated in step 5.
    database object itself was not existent.. so consistency check is not helpful.
    We recognized the problem.. at present, we have DDIC object for table with a field length 10(new lenght), a QCMtable which contains original data with filed lenght 11(Old value) and a conversion table QCM8table which has filed lenght 10(new value).
    Now, in my case, original table had some Rows for that column lenght 11 and it was unable to transfer them to QCM8table.
    I had raised an OSS to SAP.
    thanks
    ashish

  • DVMC Saving Potential for table COEP

    Hello All,
    i am curious to know the answer for the below interesting topic.
    We have implemented the Solution Manager DVMC tool for few production systems. After we setup the query and BPM to analyze the saving potential calculation for the few of the table as per the DVM Sizes growth below question applies.
    The Saving potential for table COEP, MSEG (for system like 4.7 systems) says to do the deletion potential. For example, the table last analysis 146.149,000 and out of that the deletion potential = 146.093,987
    So based on the saving potential, we want to make a strategy looking at the deletion potential operational possibilities. However, looking at the SAP standard best practice documentation, we see the table like MSEG and COES u201Cdeletion cannot be usedu201D which is quite contradictory towards the report result in the DVMC report for saving potential.
    I believe, there should be some reason, the Table analysis says about the deletion potential for these tables. I must curious to know the reason for the same.
    Can anybody also explain how we can use the DVMC report either for Saving Potential or archiving potential in the operational activity? Like after we find the result, according to deletion potential, which records to be deleted etc.
    Regards,
    Shashi
    Edited by: Shashi Samal on Feb 29, 2012 5:45 PM
    Edited by: Shashi Samal on Feb 29, 2012 5:45 PM

    Hello Shashi,
    I wouldn't delete any table even if DVMC  recommends so. I don't know your DB vendor but most of them (like DB2) offers table compression for saving spaces.
    regards, Javier

  • Cannot activate modifications for table structure in SPDD during upgrade

    Hi, all.
    I am now trying to upgrade ECC5.0 to ERP6.0.
    In SPDD screen, some modifications which will be lost are found with yellow traffic signal.
    I have already tried to "adopt modifications", but the results can be categorized to 2 types.
    Type1: Table XXXX was activated with warning. (Some fields were inserted by us.)
      [Warning messages]
      ! Enhancement category for table missing.
      ! Enhancement category for include or subtype missing.
      ! Field ZXXXX does not lie within customer namespace.
      Table ZXXXX was activated with warning.
      Appended table XXXX is temporarily partially active.
    After clicking "back" button on Log display screen, " Adjustment of table XXXX can be completed".
    I clicked "back" and selected "No" in pop-up screen of "Reset to original", the row of the table became green check mark.
    However, when I checked "Versions" to compare "modif" and "active", the row of "modif" did not appear in "Versions of Object XXXX of Type Table Definition" screen, and seems that the modifications will be lost from "delta display" screen.
    Can you provide me the solution of this situation ?
    I guess these Tables in Type1 will be activated and the row of "modif" appear in "Versions" screen, if I could solve the warning, but I do not know how to do it.
    Type2: Modifications cannot be adopted to Table XXXX
      The table which will be changed in "General Attributes"
        -from "Not classified" to "Can be enhanced(character-type)"
        -from "Can be enhanced(character-type)" to "Can be enhanced(character-type or numeric)".
      I have chosen "Adopt modifications", then Phase2 with message "Proposal corresponds to current version" appeared.
    When I click "Back" and in pop-up screen which propose " Reset to original" I clicked "No", then the traffic signal was still yellow.
    How can I adopt modifications for this type ?
    Sorry for long question.
    Appreciate if you could answer above at least one of them soon.
    Best regards,
    Shin

    activate by enter the shadow system
    you can unlock the shadow system using sapup -unlockshd

  • Need information for table maintenance genarator?

    HI Sir,
    I have  a tcode for table maintenance generator of Z table, my requirement is to add new field to that Z table.
    Is it required to maintain table maintenance generator again for that table and how to assign the same tcode for that.
    plz  help me to solve this.
    thanks and regards
    syed
    Basic question. Please put some effort from your side before posting here. You have already been warned against breaking the rules of this forum. Continued violations will lead to account deletion.
    Edited by: kishan P on Sep 2, 2010 11:59 AM

    Hi Taj,
    When you add your new field in the table, the table gets partially active first, then you need to Adjust the table using Database Utility (SE14) to get the table activated.
    For Database Utility see online help [Database Utility|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/EN/a4/3790360ee65840e10000009b38f839/frameset.htm]
    Then You need to regenerate the table maintainence Generator.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Abhii
    Edited by: Abhii on Sep 2, 2010 7:06 AM

  • How does the field ABGRU-Reason for Rejection get populated in routines

    Hi All,
    How does the field ABGRU-Reason for Rejection get populated in routines(VOFM)?
    BELNR,KPOSN,etc...fields are populated through KOMK and KOMP structures, similar way what structure is used for ABGRU?
    by the time the control from VA01 comes to routine the values of VBAK and VBAP are cleared, so these structures like KOMP and KOMK are used.
    Thanks in advance.

    You need to add rejection reason field ABGRU as a new field to pricing field catalog (KOMG structure) through APPEND structure KOMPAZ. KOMG inherits new fields from KOMKAZ (for header level fields) or KOMPAZ (for item level fields) structures and it is not directly modified but through KOMKAZ and KOMPAZ structures
    Since VBAP-ABGRU can vary from item to item, add it to item pricing communication structure KOMPAZ in SE11. Once KOMPAZ is added with new ABGRU field and activated it will automatically appear in pricing field catalog (KOMG)
    Afterwards the ABGRU field will then start to appear in the field catalog where you can create condition table (V/03) including the ABGRU as a field. Once done the rest is assigning the condition table to access sequence which is in turn assigned to the relevant condition type that you want to price based on partner function (all under IMG -> SD -> Basic functions -> Pricing -> Pricing control)
    In the pricing user exit userexit_pricing_prepare_tkomp in include MV45AFZZ, you will need a few lines of coding to fetch VBAP-ABGRU for the item and pass it to tkomp-abrug field. This will then be used by system to read the new condition table that you created.
    tkomp-abgru= xvbap-abgru
    So if you populate special pricing based on ABGRU (with possibly other conditions) in the condition table then that condition record will be read for the corresponding condition type.
    You would of course need a developer to modify KOMPAZ structure and code the user exit for moving the rejection reason to tkomp
    That is in short how you can achieve this

  • DVMC Saving Potential for table COEP, MSEG

    Hello Experts,
    I must curious to know the answer for the below interesting question.
    We have implemented the Solution Manager DVMC tool for few production systems. After we setup the query and BPM to analyze the saving potential calculation for the few of the table as per the DVM Sizes growth below question applies.
    The Saving potential for table COEP, MSEG (for system like 4.7 systems) says to do the deletion potential. For example, the table last analysis 146.149,000 and out of that the deletion potential = 146.093,987
    So based on the saving potential, we want to make a strategy looking at the deletion potential operational possibilities. However, looking at the SAP standard best practice documentation, we see the table like MSEG and COES u201Cdeletion cannot be usedu201D which is quite contradictory towards the report result in the DVMC report for saving potential.
    I believe, there should be some reason, the Table analysis says about the deletion potential for these tables. I must curious to know the reason for the same.
    Can anybody also explain how we can use the DVMC report either for Saving Potential or archiving potential in the operational activity? Like after we find the result, according to deletion potential, which records to be deleted etc.
    Regards,
    Shashi

    Hello Shashi,
    I wouldn't delete any table even if DVMC  recommends so. I don't know your DB vendor but most of them (like DB2) offers table compression for saving spaces.
    regards, Javier

Maybe you are looking for